How Boeing 787 Has Become So POWERFUL?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 дек 2022
- Boeing is in Huge trouble! The company has been in the news for some crazy reasons. From dropping revenues to innovation problems, it seems to be screwed and needs a savior. With United Airlines as one of its biggest customers, Boeing will need them as their savior from potential disaster. So, why is Boeing in huge trouble? and more importantly, will UNITED be able to save the manufacturing giant?
Want to watch more, please SUBSCRIBE for many more videos like these.
SUBSCRIBE: / @untoldaviation
New Videos EVERY WEEK
#boeing #boeing787 
Авто/Мото
I love KLM's B787-10 business class.... it's truly a dream
787 and 777x has a wing design no known to most pilot and rider flyer,The wing blends aerodynamically with air stream rendering smoothen flying.The blending create less drag for fuel efficiency and flying comfort.
Boeing is one of the few companies that has almost all its Commercial Aircaft engineers supported by a UNION (SPEEA). When the brightest engineers NEED PROTECTION from the company that is dependant on their design & safety innovations, you that Boeing leadership is clueless!
Adding engineers in India is not the answer....
Hawaiian Airlines recently placed some orders for the 787, that will also help. I love flying Hawaiian but I do not like flying on Hawaiian's Airbus products.
Doubt it. Boeing to be around a long time
Boeing's top level executive needs to be replaced with a sustainable talented individuals . . . the B737-MAX debacle showed the world how Boeing's top bosses are running the company in recent years . . . the company itself needs a major restructuring asap . . . Boeing could collaborate with Rolls Royce GB in developing a state-of-the-art cutting edge hybrid aero propulsion solution that will be reliable & fuel efficient by as much as 50% . . . especially in large wide body jets like the B747-8I & B777-300 ER . . . hybrid aero propulsion is only thing that can sustain operating double decker wide body quad jets like the B747-8I & A380-800 . . .
Boeing's current backlog is 4834, far more than the United order.
NOT much good if Boeing are issued a $800 Billion Fine by WTO for Illegal DoD subsidies?
@@trevorhart545 Why not make it $800 trillion? WTO has no enforcement authority.
4834 is the number of POTENTIAL (Future) orders. A much smaller number is actually supported by commitments of delivery by a contracted date! The fact that you stand in line for tickets does not mean that you will actually see the movie!!
If only Boeing knew how much the flying public and cabin crew hates the 737. Please stop stretching this plane. Wish the 757 was still in production. Oh well.
Not true the numbers for the max with 1000 flying now ,are coming back in with a efficiency rating across all sectors of the plane at 99.95% efficiency pilots,crew members, maintenance, workers are saying it's much better than Boeing promised.
@@andrewlarson7895 👍🏽
Yes the 737's need a white sheet airplane
I LOVE the 737. It like the "sports sedan" of aircraft. Its also the safest aircraft in the sky. Including the MAX. As long as its flown by competent pilots, that is. Fly a Max from a third word airline and, well, you're asking for trouble. Avoid Jakarta based "Rion Air" or "Ethiopian Air" (who hires inexperienced 20 year old pilots) and you'll be fine!
Outsourcing engineering to India. American corporations avoiding the issue - inferior product / quality, and trying save short-term costs by outsourcing to other markets, when they should be investing in the best local talent to eventually develop a superior product.
Boeing has been outsourcing work for over 90 years with india this news is far for new, news
Using talent from other countries is not a problem per se for a global company serving a global market. The problem is that they are going to India not even for the cheaper labour costs (they could have that by importing the talent) but the more lax labour rules. This after they failed to keep unionized engineers intent on leaving by offering them - not better working conditions, but stock options. They just don't get it, being anti-labour is like fundamentalist ideology for the management of US corporations now, facts don't matter (even the success of their more labour-friendly and no less wage-intensive foreign competitors, like Airbus for Boeing).
@@Daneelro India is a very merging market. So yeah i dont like it. but they have to keep their stock holders happy. They dont get to roll in free money 💰 like Airbus does.so it also comes down to cost.
@@andrewlarson7895 !? Airbus doesn't roll in free money, either, and is a stock company, too.
@@Daneelro it's like what one popular car RUclipsr says here: the Japanese will always make better cars for many reasons, least of which is that management in Japanese companies aren't constantly at war with their own work force.
400k in stock is a slap across the face. how says the stock price wount go down
A slap in the face. I work for a large corporation and they didn’t offer anything. Has anyone ever offered you 400k?
Completely ignoring the 777-x models....
This is all old info. Boeing will be fine. There’s too much demand for airplanes, especially with the growing global population. Airbus can’t make them all
Boeing needs to get started on the flying saucer, planes are still too dangerous.
Boeing are not finding solutions, rather they are avoiding the problem! First of all, they are relying on United airlines to be purchasing most of their aircraft for the next few years. Who said they will definitely do so? They may back out any time! Secondly, getting cheaper labour done in India only increases the chances for manufacturing faults to occur. Finally, they need to stop developing the 737-max, and focus on bringing the 757/767 series back into the market. Personally, I think a 757 with an increased range would be a massive solution to these problems…
You dont know boeing well at all and your little story here is well, not even close to what Boeing is about. If you're really interested do some studying, you will learn alot.
@@andrewlarson7895 Boeing fanboy? 😂? First of all, my comment was in regards to this video. Secondly, I might not know the most, but I know the basics as I’ve been learning about them for years. Let me know what your opinions are…
@@olleh3715 its what you know but its what i know from working at boeing with the 737 for 42 years now retired
@@andrewlarson7895 If that’s what you claim. No disrespect but your English doesn’t make sense. I would really like to know what it is. IMO and and applying facts, the 737 was only meant for short flights and carrying a small amount of passengers. Boeing are just trying to stretch it out at this point. They used to have such a lovely diverse range of aeroplanes such as the 757, or the 767. But Boeing does not seem to understand what customers actually want, and what they demand is in the market.
@@olleh3715 well time will tell now wont it 😭
Please no more plastic jets or engines
New Aircraft name: the Globe 🌎🌍 Bender!
Boeing needs to quite devoting massive amounts of resources to environmental sustainability, and work on real innovation. They have major problems that need to be fixed and worrying about NetZero should not be a priority.
They need to keep their woke investors happy but you're right! Not only Boeing, but Airbus and other plane manufacturers!
This is foolish and unrealistic for two reasons:
1. Lower fuel consumption = lowers fuel costs (duh)
2. Europe will eventually demand environmental sustainability from the airline industry. If Boeing is to have any future on that continent, they must take those demands into account.
Boeing putting headquarters near Washington and using Indian engineers does not give me a warm fuzzy. The best strategy is to cluster all suppliers, management, and have a center of excellence manufacturing in one location. Boeings problem is they hire MBAs from American universities, who have been trained with BS narratives. Tesla is vertical integrated...take a clue Boeing. But they cannot...brainwashed.
Boeing isn't going away
wont fly Boeing again ever after Max issues.
Then you shouldn't fly airbus as well they been the same situation as the max was a few times.
whn u fly budget airlines, its not your choice but u r forced to travel ,bcz more than1000+ 737 max flying n more 3000 are coming in next 3-4 yrs
It's difficult to say this graciously but you're clueless. The only problem Boeing has right now is a large debt load, which will be paid down in the next few years. Wall Street understands this, which is why the stock has recently rallied. Demand for freighters and twin-aisles will grow significantly in the coming years and Boeing's only hurdle is to get the 777x through flight test and certification. When all these factors converge in 2 or 3 years, the free cash flow situation will be tremendously enticing for investors.
Boeing will be just fine
F the investors. McDonald Douglas took a dirt nap with that attitude. Boeing USED to be innovation and quality driven. Build em better and the business will follow.
Title of the video is misleading ...
Boeing, yet another great company getting suffocated by greed
I think I speak for most people when I say; I could give a rat's ass hearing news about a company's stock value, expenditures or it's investors. I thought this is an aviation channel? Why not just stick to the subject of the aircraft them selves.
You mean to say trump gave boing a spanking 😂😂😂
After your last “new” plane killing more than 300 lives in not even a year, I’d also be very careful to announce something new being labelled “Boeing’s newest flying coffin”
I dont think boeing will call it a coffin, im pretty sure about that.
Under trained pilots....stop the nonsense and get real.
Both Max crashes could have been avoided had the pilots flipped just two switches and deactivated the automation, saving both aircraft. The part that failed was made by Raytheon, not Boeing. In the case of the first Max crash, (Lion Air) the AOA sensor (made by Raytheon) had failed the day before, causing flight control problems, the pilots on that flight, correctly flipped the two switches (as trained) and landed the plane safely. The next day the plane was returned to service unrepaired and the day shift pilots were not warned that the plane was in need of repairs. This inexcusable negligence of returning a damaged aircraft to service falls on the airline, not Boeing, its not Boeing's fault the aircraft was abused and neglected, and the airline KNOWINGLY flew a disabled plane, and didn't even warn the pilots. The second Max crash (Ethiopian Air) both pilots were in their 20s and were HIGHLY inexperienced. When the Raytheon made part (AOA sensor) failed, neither pilot knew what to do, and neither flipped the two switches to deactivate MCAS (as they should have been trained to do, especially in light of the prior MCAS crash) This is pilot error, not Boeings fault, that the two pilots were underpaid, inexperienced "kids" in their 20s. Its simply not Boeings fault that in the case of the first crash, a KNOWN defective plane was allowed to fly with passengers the next day, and in the second case, two young, untrained pilots, did not know how to deactivate MCAS in their own aircraft. NOT BOEINGS FAULT. So sick of LIARS Felix who HATE AMERICA and spread lies and disinformation.
Boing will be gone soon, because of bad management.
This is a pretty fail youtuber. Says stuff like "it takes billions to develope a new airline". You mean airliner? perhaps using less translators would help.