Gao: Nuclear subs deal means Australia will lose ‘privilege of not being targeted’ | China Tonight
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2021
- The announcement made late last week of a new trilateral security partnership between the Australian, American and British governments has ricocheted around the world.
Subscribe: / abcnewsindepth
While China wasn't mentioned by the three leaders, the subtext was clear. So what is it's reaction?
Victor Gao is the Vice President of the Center for China and Globalization and Chair Professor of Soochow University in China. He was also once a translator for the former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping.
He joins Stan Grant for an extended interview on China Tonight.
ABC News In-depth takes you deeper on the big stories, with long-form journalism from Four Corners, Foreign Correspondent, Australian Story, Planet America and more, and explainers from ABC News Video Lab.
Watch more ABC News content ad-free on iview: ab.co/2OB7Mk1
For more from ABC News, click here: ab.co/2kxYCZY
Get breaking news and livestreams from our ABC News channel: / newsonabc
Like ABC News on Facebook: / abcnews.au
Follow ABC News on Instagram: / abcnews_au
Follow ABC News on Twitter: / abcnews
Note: In most cases, our captions are auto-generated.
#ABCNewsIndepth #ABCNewsAustralia
![Kehlani - Next 2 U [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MpI7ekFG8A0/mqdefault.jpg)
![KFF Singapore Badminton Open 2024 | He/Ren (CHN) vs. Alfian/Ardianto (INA) [7] | F](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/an7AykjOaAA/mqdefault.jpg)
Saying "the nuclear submarine have no nuclear misslie" is as stupid as saying " My gun has no bullet" when you pull it out in front of a police. How could people be that stupid
everyone talking about winning a nuclear war but honestly there is no winner in a nuclear war
The PRC is the only one threatening "Nuclear War".
You might be true. But the only way to prevent a nuclear war where one side has them and other doesn't is for the other side acquire them too. Like it or not, paradoxically it is less likely for a nuclear state to attack another nuclear state than a non nuclear state. Unfortunately that's the way the world works. So it's long overdue Australia acquired nukes to protect ourselves. Not necessarily against China but a whole range of countries who already have nukes
@@johnbrowning8785 US Australia are provoking it by their actions.
@@bigB987 Right then they can blow each other up and the rest of the world with them. Ever thought about giving them up altogether? No because the US war machine and war equipment manufactures need to make money and Australia is the silly bunny giving it to them. Has Australia ever said NO to the US? Good on you New Zealand and south Korea more intelligent leadership there no doubt..
@@rosebud4387 In what way? Australia doesn't even have nukes, they're arming their coastline in a defensive strategy, hardly provoking. China are the ones undergoing 40 years of manufacturing a huge military asset capable of global destruction and aggression. That's on them.
“Australia will be a target for nuclear attack? From whom?”
“Mind your business, you don’t need to know who!”
Wooow.
Love the way these westerner play the victim card 😅
What a likable guy.
Ahaha!
Not sure if sarcasm or CCP shill lol
GOLD! lol. Maybe he wants to be governor when they take us over.
@@duncanwallace7760 have you guys got the port of Darwin back yet?
Haha....give the bloke his due, it was only thinly veiled, the message was clear. France wants its money and let's face it, I hate that we always have to do America's bidding and we have ALWAYS been a target for that very reason.
if you are defenceless, you are not a target. mmm hmmm.
yeah, go nuclear! safer. as long as Australia is not trying to interfere in others business.
Well.. that sure depend on, in what sentence u call 'not a target'??
If u ask all those surrounding countries, that continuously are getting bullied by Chinese warship/firefighters ..in their own national sea/coastline area?!!
I'm not sure they'd agree to the truth of that statement!
@@SirAser.F__k.you.Google the US has been running sorties of military flights up and down the chinese coast line for years. Bullying is the mildest to describe.
@@tyh9206 So.. since China don't dare a direct face-off with US, they let their anger and frustration loose on their minor neighbors, bullying the Filippines, Vietnam and Malaysian neighbors instead...??!
That's a really mature and powerful statement...(not)
@@SirAser.F__k.you.Google these days, the surrogate countries get smashed while the big elephants dance around.... US and China shout at each other, and Taiwan get bombed...
He just threatened Australia with nuclear weapons and did so publicly.
There's your warning Australia. Heed it well.
They know the Left in Australia rather bend and pull down there pants for the CCP than Australia have Nucelar Weapons as a deterent.
Delroy, let them snuff out each other.
Buy more nuclear stuffs
@@mitchjames9350 Famous last words Mitch when you get snuffed out in a nuclear war.
@@rosebud4387 Well, apparently to this CCP threat, its either we get snuffed out or we get snuffed out.
The Chinese troll farms must be getting an extra 50 cents an hour, they're working overtime on this thread
$1200 COVID bill makes you satisfied?
@@dexlee7277 what $1200 covid bill?
Yes I think they got a raise after the covid leak , went from 60 cents a post to 70 cents
lots of wumao indeed
He might have been a little too transparent. LOL
Nope, hes speaking the truth. and you anglos cant handle the truth. live in your bubble.
@Che Guevara the world is a little unbalanced now, we all need to realize it and sit together and solve it, can chine be conquered by westerner by force/war? it maight happen. but the westerner could lose their position like nowadays. when you talk about fighting china, dont' forget russia, japan, arabian countries, india or even some western europe countries. it's not a remind, it is real life. Chinese people don't like fight, but we are not sheeps.
First time a chinese policy person is transparent
@Che Guevara China would be destroyed by the USA in a conventional war. China's soldiers have no experience, lesser equipment, and are less patriotic. The US military have been in active conflicts for decades, it would be no contest, and thats why Xi has to send his goons to posture on television. Put your money where your mouth is China, all talk no walk.
@@asdfman7007 less patriotic? Dream on.
i feel terribly sorry for this fellow. Stan forced him to talk about geo-politics when it's obvious that his real passion is interior decorating.
Lmaoooooo
LMAO
He's a commie shrill.
The best comment on this thread...interior decoration with CCP characteristics.
@Che Guevara Good on you champ - thanks for playing.
I'm a European national, but I want to thank Mr Gao for giving Australia a lecture, hopefully Australians are smart enough tp digest the lecture. Fre Julian Assange Australia, your own Julian Assange, don't be cowards.
"To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.” ~ Henry Kissinger
Yeah there are a lot of afghans that would agree with that.
To be enemies to god your are condemned.
To be friends with god you have salvation.
😀
Do not quote .
How to treat Ccp china relationship.
To be friends you are been sucked dry.
To be enemy you are will disappeared from the world.
@@acheeyk Iron ore and coal are Australia's key exports, together worth more than $120 billion - or 30 per cent of what gets sold to foreign countries.
They are followed by education services, which rake in $32.4 billion (or 8 per cent of the nation's exports) from international students.
These happen to be the key goods and services that China buys from Australia.
In 2017-18, China was by far Australia's largest trading partner, contributing $194.6 billion worth of imports and exports. This was more than the combined value of trade with Japan and the United States ($147.8 billion).
Because of morons like you, Australia will lose badly.
@@acheeyk all this education in America and they still can’t speak English correctly.
My ex is Taiwanese…. She said she’d rather die then become part of China mainland. Taiwan is the real China and have held the traditional writing ✍️.
1.4 billion Chinese people disagree. Most of the Taiwanese people have their roots in Mainland.
Looks like her wish may come through soon....
Anyone can claim anything, doesn't mean its yours. I myself claim China as my country and Xi Jinping a fake Winnie Pooh dictator
FOR MAINLAND CHINA, IT IS SIMPLE, AFTER UNITE TAIWAN, WHOEVER WANT TO STAY AS 中国人，THEY CAN STAY; WHOEVER WANT TO LEAVE, THEY ARE FREE TO LEAVE.
THE RULING PARTY OF TAIWAN NOW NOT EVEN RECOGNIZE THEMSELVE AS CHINESE, HOW CAN TAIWAN BE THE "REAL" CHINA?
0:45Beijing said won't use nuclear weapons first
bullshits
Sounds like Oz can survive in non-nuclear ones 😉
Misfired....
China never says anything about the elephant in the room their arch enemy INDIA that has their ICBM missile aimed at china.
Well they don't have too wait for the subs will they they can do it anytime now if they wanted to .
He says to an Australian, "that they don't need to know who will attack them with nuclear weapons".
This a threat. Clear and obvious.
Their language is escalating.
These childish threats make It appear that Xi is seriously alarmed by AUKUS. “Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
@Daniel Taylor True, though I don't think that the QUAD, AUKUS, or the Europeans have designs on carving up China --- merely keeping them polite. However, the Chinese still study Sun Tzu. Here's another: “To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy.”
― Sun Tzu
@Daniel Taylor China was under foreign Manchu rule. The problem was the weak Qing and corrupt Qing dynasty. China is now free from imperial rule and stronger now thanks to the CPC
Funny, an agricultural country 'promised' to get outdated nuclear weapon carrier (without weapon) indeed seriously alarm a country and its 16 nuclear submarines fleet, each with 4-12 ballistic missiles (again, each with 4-6 nuclear headers).
@Daniel Taylor CCP will use any claim and international law as long as it is favorable to them.
@@deezeed2817 under Xi Ji Bai rule now. no difference from imperial rule?
Ok everyone let's play the "Listen to me" Drinking game.
Never a more aggrevating use of the word "listen".
8:40 he chokes up after he realized that he admitted US has better weapons
Good catch 🤣
Funny you say that, because China has live hypersonic missiles that can penetrate the US air defenses atm. do you even read the news you blind fool?
Australia getting schooled like a child 😂😂 must suck to be weak
Australia is so proud to be the Deputy Sheriff of USA. Poking their nose into others business. Better stay away from our region. It is none of your business. We will settle our own problems here ourselves. We do not need you to be a busy body.
Surely Australia getting submarines is Australian business and China should also stay out of that then?
And I bet you live in Sydney, so leave🤣
long story short: Australia wasn't taken seriously until they got nuke subs
If you think America didn't already have some form of nuclear armaments on Australian soil, you're very much mistaken
👏
Now if china stop buying from us, we fire nuke at them! Same with India! No mercy!
Joe still can’t remember scomo
and now they are a laughing stock -- fellas down under
He's bluffing. Australia will always be a potential target with or without a nuke submarine
Can't urge the fact that Ausralian seems to blindly follow US and involved itself in a conflict that it doesn't need to get involve. China and Australia doesn't have any border or maritime boundary conflict. Both countries are separated by Indonesia. Australian medias and politicians are just fear mongering the general public to justifiy for their defend budget spending. Which by the way is a result of political think tank that funded by the US weapon manufacturers like Lockheed Martin... They need to increase their profit margin.. Peaceful world is definitely the last thing they want on planet earth. Go figure!
At the end of the day American will be benefited from all this conflicts .
If China goes down , American will be super power in the coming future as well.
And that's exactly what the American wants
Yes, if China goes down.
Any idea who will go down together?
Australia, maybe?
No, that’s impossible. Australia will soon have a nuclear submarine, right?
this statement and the lack of clarification screams desperation and fragility
You need to understand the logic of geopolitics here. Australia will acquire nuclear subs because it distrusts China. Therefore China can not afford to trust Australia will not own nuclear weapon capability if it manufactures nuclear subs locally. The sheer fact that Australia goes nuclear with its submarines will make Australia a nuclear target. Everything the man said is true.
@@MrThezous Sort of the same thing can be said about any country with nuclear reactors. What is the difference between a nuclear powered submarine and a nuclear power station? Had Australia acquired nuclear weapons, then yes, his comments would be true. Now it is just bullying and lies.
Sanctions time! Do it China.👍
@@nedred703 China is the one with big sticks, the opponent of your block boss USA. AUKUS violates the non-proliferstion convention and it is thteatening Asia stability. You aussy will feel the pains of N. Korea under USA sanctions, the difference here is China is the one that hit you. under the same rules.
@@richardlee9207 how is Australia breaking a treaty about non proliferation of nuclear weapons? That makes no sense at all.
A smaller dog barks the laudest.
is that an ancient chinese proverb by any chance XDXDXD
sponsored by the CCP wu mao army. State sponsored trolls pain 50cents
Better than a bunch of fat guys on the land of convicts😂😂
Rabid dogs need to be put down
@@military0f21stcentury2 So mind washed unmotivated puppets are better ;)
No one attacks a nuclear nation. Just ask North Korea and then ask Ukraine. Those subs can easily be loaded with nuclear missiles at anytime. No doubt, US and UK troops will be stationed in Northern Australia at some point.
The US has had troops stationed in the NT for some time now
Ukraine?
@@izidrew Yeah, Ukraine have no nukes so of course Russia messes with them.
Well, I guess Australia, Japan and India will just have to REMOVE the nuclear "threat."
It will take Australia at least ten years to get it's first Nuke sub, Japan without US help is just a spent force. India, may take 20 years or may not be able to catch up with the might of China . So how to remove China nuke now ? Fat hope.
@@luwaimun6705 not if usa and uk are helping them
@@luwaimun6705 don't think Indian military is that behind of China.... China ranks 3rd and India ranks 4th in military fire power...and Indian military is war ready....
@@sandipk2575 ask India to try another boarder war with China & see what will be the result. If US stay out of this disputes, 1962 history will repeat.
@@luwaimun6705 what about 1967
If these are the official views of the CCP then they are unhinged. I am now convinced we need these assets - and many more - to protect Australia.
sadly even with those you dnt stand a chance lol
@@carlomikhailreid4365 as if we would be doing it on our own. we have deals with japan, india, USA, UK, south korea.
Exactly. Everything China says and does shows how much of an arrogant bully it is. They're housing economy is collapsing. Maybe they should shut up about other countries and deal with that.
You might not like what he's saying, it make sense what he's saying that all nuclear power countries does target each other just like U.S. target China, Russia, India, Pakistan and vice versa.
It will be a long time before these boats hit the water, but we should still get them.
If we must go down? then let us go down fighting.
That is the Australian way.
China is not our friend, we should not pretend it is.
The biggest mistake the West ever made was to do business with these clowns.
No doing business with them wasn't a mistake, we've made a shite load of money of selling them iron ore, coal, wheat,.... etc.
*Letting them be in charge and or dictate the terms of those business agreements was a series of MONSTROUS and IDIOTIC MISTAKES (plural).*
The worst mistake that's happened is the policy of continuous backing down to and appeasement of the CCP.
Yes it was the West thinking that they are the god's chosen people and will always can subdue another whenever they want to, as done in the past, to Japan, Germany, USSR, China and other part of the world.
@who cares" Taiwan is part of china! " Not my words, but Biden's in his recent call to XI. President Biden is no wumao stupid! He is the president of USA.
The same logic to any country that owns nuclear weapons is once you possess that weapons, then you are potential threats to other countries. Then U.S. nuclear weapons def target all countries who owned nuclear weapons regardless of its allies or enemies. Same to China here. I hope Australian people can sort out what it is going to happen.
This Victor Gao is basically threatening the Aussies.
China will win though, logically speaking
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c China vs the world as they are making nothing but enemies. But go ahead and explain your version of logic, Spock.
@@Fallen608 why are you so rude? All I did was left my comment. You called me a Spock. I’m not from China btw. Of course if the world teams up against China that’s a diff story. The question is whether aussie can sustain collateral damage….
Spock
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c Spock was a reference to the Star Trek character because you said "logically". A Trekkie joke notwithstanding, no the question is who "wins" as you stated, so I would like to hear your logic
@@user-kd2ez2mb3c what they're not talking about is all Australia is is a jumping-off point for America when China attacks Singapore. Nuclear subs in Australia are just American saber-rattling. And it's real that's why we evacuated Afghanistan. We are not Tangled Up in any Foreign Wars at the moment complete Focus on China.
China is not even making a veiled threat. Aus should tell them where to go.....
You start the threat first,stupid aus
As a general rule, when the CCP says the Australian people should choose A) we are better off choosing B)
Given you don't even know that there's no such thing as the CCP, you're in no state to be making choices on geopolitics.
@@mortarriding3913 the Communist Chinese Party - yeah its head is Hitler Xi. These tyrants might as well bring on the war now, ours, Taiwans and the worlds freedom always has and always will be worth fighting for
@@mortarriding3913 No such thing as the Chinese Communist Party ? You mean Chairman Mao was just a figment of John Lennon's imagination ?
@@mortarriding3913 no CCP? Ok fine. West Taiwan then.
@@jeffreyhutchins6527 yes. There is no such thing as the Chinese Communist Party. How dense are you exactly?
Mr. Gao is talking like he is ready to detonate the bombs!
Maybe Australia will become a target but China was already a target for that matter.
Trying to scare the Australian population into not defending themselves.
@Tommy Aung - TA What is a reality?
It really is a pathetic line to follow, if nuclear weapons were used on either side life as we know it would be over, that is whether or not Australia happened to be a target the resultant nuclear winter would kill anyone not directly targeted anyway...
@Tommy Aung - TA Can't you read... Nuclear bombs aimed at Australia or not, if ANYONE launches at ANYONE the world will be over, Australia is included in that.
Tommy Aung - TA Dude...there's a huge difference between a navy having a "nuclear arsenal" and a navy having nuclear powered vessels.
You can't morally use nuclear weapons on a country that uses nuclear powered vessels anymore then one that has a civilian nuclear power plant.
@Tommy Aung - TA I don't think you get it, a nuclear war would result in no food for your overpopulated country lol!
@@Agent80s You can definitely declare it is only a nuclear powered vessel with conventional weapons. But why would your opponent trust you on that topic? You obviously will not invite them to inspect, and there are no precedent for any country to have a nuclear powered vessel with only conventional weapons. even the Nuclear attack subs have nuclear torpedos.
By the moment nuclear component enters service of this nation's military forces, your opponent logically cannot consider you a non-nuclear player anymore. That is why Chinese diplomat particularly signaled in their comment and speeches on the subject with this word:"strategic meaning" "strategic target". This directly translate to "significant increase in nuclear strike ranking"
I hope people realise that the 'privileged position' that Australia supposedly held in a potential conflict never actually existed.
You guys lost something you never had. So obnoxious. Who is this Chinese "diplomat"?
That's not correct. It very much did.
@@Szkorbut7 he's not a diplomat. He's an academic.
Make friends not enemies. Do you need to spend on weapons to prevent invasion from USA or UK?
@the ridiculous mash there's no such thing as the CCP.
1. Why is it a problem to have submarines?
It’s not because China never said much when Australia had deals with France.
2. Why can’t we have NUCLEAR submarines?
Obtaining nuclear weaponry/technology still counts as going nuclear. Just because you say they won’t be nuclear armed is like a person obtaining an illegal weapon and saying it’s fine because we won’t arm it.
3. Does that mean China will target Australia?
Historically Australia have been involved in majority of the conflicts that the United States have been in. With that knowledge and accounting the current situation of foreign aggression in the South China Sea… the Australian will get themselves caught in the cross fire especially when they no longer have their no nuclear status protection. Meaning sure you can still help US but don’t go nuclear. (Short answer: it will become a possible outcome when receiving the nuclear technology)
*Fun fact that China has a nuclear no first use policy*
Meaning even if Australia has them they won’t be attacked by nuclear bombs UNLESS the US starts using them.
Basically a self defense mechanism 🤔
4. Why is China mad at Australia?
Many factors and most of them involve foreign influences. One is the trade war, two Australia joined in on the anti China propaganda drive, three joined US in their “war games” 12 miles away from Chinese territorial waters, and other factors. Intervention of Chinese reunification of their sovereign territory. (Aka Taiwan which was annexed into China during the Qing dynasty for over 200 years… then stripped after the Japanese invasion followed by Western invasion during the Boxer rebellion)
5. What propaganda drive? (From Question 4)
Uyghurs genocide/concentration camps/human right allegations (Which hold no concrete evidence besides fabricated testimonies that have been debunked in different sources.)
Covid 19 Origins conspiracy where Australia instigated a request for a second search in Wuhan Labs. This demand was requested after the first search where WHO came for a thorough investigation. Some speculated that this request was due to US pressure/influences.
Ofc take my interpretation as a grain of salt… do some digging into the topics I went over for validation. Make sure to challenge whatever conclusions you come up with and this way you can be sure that your position is more valid then your previous one.
Fun fact who supported Vietnam and ended up fighting against them for 10 years after the Americans. Who supported North Korea with arms and soldiers. China that's who.
China new the French subs would never turn up, that's why.
@@chrisdeason4904 Then why are the French that upset if they were never planning to complete the deal? (P.S Had another message in response to Mr Grant Morris above but the message has been deleted 2x now... got to love freedom of speech huh?
@@mmouser2800 The French sub deal has been compromised from day one, some components built in Europe, some manufacturing to be completed in South Australia, apparently 3 billion spent thus far, nothing in return, endless redesign issues, we'll all be dead and gone by the time one was completed...
Truth is with a vast coastline such as Aus the drone is probably the most economic and fastest way to move forward if national security is the big issue.
@@grantesla Attempt number 3 unless its gets deleted again... Search the key phrase below if you want the true plan of the wars your mentioned. Should be a US government published unclassified documentation of what really happened.
*Draft Memorandum From Secretary of Defense McNamara to President Johnson*
The Britts kicked there arse 150 yrs ago. The chicoms are still the same punks. Free Hong Kong 🇭🇰
I guess those people are still burning in hell for their crimes
Tell China their "concern" about Australia's safety is very nice of them to mention, but that China shouldn't worry too much about any other nation's wellbeing. Gao's language reminds me of the thinly veiled threats extortioners use like "It would be a shame if any accidents were to happen to you". It reminds me of it, because it *IS* it.
You need to understand the logic of geopolitics here. Australia will acquire nuclear subs because it distrusts China. Therefore China can not afford to trust Australia will not own nuclear weapon capability if it manufactures nuclear subs locally. The sheer fact that Australia goes nuclear with its submarines will make Australia a nuclear target. Everything the man said is true.
Then you bring it upon yourselves. You decide you need to act bellicose to protect your trade with China from China so you face the consequences.
@@MrThezous You need to understand the logic that China is ur biggest trading partner, ur single largest export market n foreign direct investment source.
Can you pls explain to me the logic of acquiring Nuclear Subs defending ur single largest customer ? So that they won't ask for refund?
Australia will be the first to go as she has a US base and within weeks
@@comredwong8949 CCP member
I’m sure the Aussies are trembling in their feet after listening to this interview 😄
As an Aussie oo scary oooo shiver me timbers
Australia will shiver definitely...but after seeing that their missiles wiped out more Chinese territory than they planned 😑
Easy to be flippant - Australia is upset with their main trading partner and consequently have taken a major decision of beckoning the US and UK nuclear capability... and having and possibly using nuclear weapons they are indeed in the first line of nuclear fire that, incidently suits the US and UK. What is worse the EU free trade agreement has now fallen through due to the submarine deal fiasco and UK will be forced to postpone their free trade deal with Australia over climate change issues. Australia has a bleak decade ahead of higher taxes and poor public services as a result of loosing their top three trading partners.
Feet and balls too shakin! 😀
Trembling? Yeah, maybe a little nervous. But pissed off more than anything.
When is Australia going to stop selling iron ore, coal and their own land and ports to China. Notice he is stressing Australia's small population, I suppose to compare their 1.3 billion people.
"Australia has no brain cell "😂😂
Who pulled the trigger mate? Looks like Wuhan did...
YES WUHAN did already, They BEST SHUT UP and LISTEN UP themselves.
Crocodile dundie needs a good bloody nose.
Very poor PR and people skills for a man of such prominent position. Come across as arrogant and high handed - threatening, bullying
Aka STANDARD CCP behavior.
...and thats his good side
Well he didn't mince his words did he.
He literaly made a nuclear threat and you guys are still try to be polite?
He stated facts. You obviously don’t like the truth.
The Soviet union had nukes with Australian targets on standby. I see no reason China would treat us any differently no matter what subs we have
Wrong, China is very different to Soviet Union. The latter did formally declare world dominance and wanted to export its political system, where as the China has not done so, she has barely enough to target America. Not least why target country which has no nuclear, now it's different. It's a poor excuse to want nuclear.
@@keepcalmcarryon9097 It has communications networks that the US uses for targeting their nukes. Of course it's a target.
@@zoeherriot those were primarily relevant to the Soviets, not the Chinese.
@@mortarriding3913 I think you'll find they are relevant to any country who is concerned the US may strike them. And if they were to start any armed conflict in the pacific that may involve the US, then yes - they are relevant.
If they were only relevant to an old power that no longer exists - why are they still operational mmm?
The USA has a fleet of SSBN's in the water at the moment and no one knows where they are only naval high command. And the SSBN's have a total nuclear arsenal to destroy the world two times over.
Yes.. Australia was so not Targeted ;) The sooner we stop sending them Iron ore the happier I will be.. learn from the past.
It would collapse their economy, which relies on construction. Maybe, you know, a two month lockdown.
Absolutely RIGHT i would STOP ASAP
Only fool will believe to gao
US supply nuclear sub to Australia today, tomorrow France supply India and then China supply Iran & north Korea. There's currently no country in the world who has nuclear sub but don't develop nuclear weapons. US & UK broke the rules.
Sounds like he is making a threat.
Ya think?
sounds? LOL he is threating 100%...
Just being honest dude!
@@tayhb8961 He's going to honest himself into a radioactive puddle.
HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH
Can Indonesia have nuclear submarines? Why can't Australia's surrounding islands have nuclear submarines, as long as they declare that they don't launch nuclear weapons。
Australia can own nuclear submarines but Indonesia can’t, boz you’re not white man country, America won’t allow you to lost their control.
Why New Zealand jumpped out and said "Ausie's new submarine will not be allowed in New Zealand waters". That little fact was quickly swept under the carpet - not to be mentioned again. Right !!!
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile-hoping it will eat him last.
Winston Churchill
Great quote.
you are right. the US is the big crocodile in the pond
@@tyh9206 And china is small paltipus... CPC logic...
Well, there you go Australia, China has made a perfect case for you to have nuclear weapons, so what are you waiting for???
Exactly mate…..
To occupy Vietnam?
This comment is stupid, US want you to pay for subs NOT for you people to have nukes. Sheesh, Chinese are clever because we see things not with impulse but with logic.
@@maryfong3439 go back to china
@@tonybarsco6573
If you girls want to commit suicide, I'm sure there are better ways!
Even you dont have nuclear Sub you will be target, As a Chinese I know. Aukus is protecting Australia.
China only respects hard power.
@@henrylawson430 As do all animals. Wolves won't go for the chicken coop twice once they've felt the sting of lead.
Anyone who thinks that China isn't a dangerous international threat is delisional.
Internationally, what China has done to make you think that it is dangerous? The only excuse is Taiwan, and it happens Taiwan is part of China. May be Hong Kong, too bad, it is also part of China, and finally, Xinjiang, Oops, also part of China.... Australia has been having a lot of fun talking about these Chinese provinces or cities as if they are INTERNATIONAL.
@@tyh9206 China has built naval bases in international waters in the South China Sea. China claims the Senkaku islands and Okinawa from Japan. China claims the entire Russian Far East which includes Vladivostok. China had debt trapped countless nations and by claiming the asset turns it into a naval base without the nation’s consent. The Chinese news constantly calls for attacking the West. China initiated the border skirmishes with India. Chinese troops occupy parts of Bhutanese, Mongolian and Nepalese territory. China is building hundreds of silos without being a part of any arms treaty.
Is that enough reasons delusional Chinese nationalist?
@@markdirtr4041 Senkaku, also called Diaoyu. Japan, was assigned as the "nanny" (caretaker after WWII), thinks itself as the the biological "mom"... funny?!
@@markdirtr4041 How did Russia obtained the Far East? say Vladivostok?
Ex Prime Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Mahatir, said,”When China naval ships came to Malaysia in 1406 with 2000 ships, Admiral Cheng Ho never conquered Malaysia but did business with locals. But when the Portuguese came to Malacca in 1511, she conquered the city, when British came to Malaysia in 1600s, she conquered Malaysia! So who to be trust Jack's ass?
"You need to use your brain" I like this guy 💪
It simple : we can attack you, because maybe you can attack us
Australia has been a target of Chinese nuclear missiles since they developed them. We were also targets of Russian nuclear missiles.
?????? Makes no sense
which is why putin is keeping his mouth shut. he's very interested in what america is capable of. were not talking about the middle east. they are peanuts compared to the prime rib that china is. we will eat that place up, like it was breakfast. then shit it out for dinner.
True...
All american allies are targets. Even russia and china target each other... So don't be so surprised.
Why did Australia preferred nuclear submarine without carrying nuclear warheads?
It's cheap and they can last in the water without refueling
@@rizjamer1353 Right meaning they can be parked outside foreign territory for offensive purposes now. Wouldn’t have sparked tension if it was the conventional ones with France where it’s mainly used for defense and territorial patrols.
@@mmouser2800 exactly. Imagine Australia’s reaction if China parked it’s submarines just outside Australia’s territorial waters 🙄
"Absolutely, Listen to me, use your brain" … who is this Gao think you are? LMHO
bold of you to assume that gao is acting on his own will, i bet behind the camera winnie and his gang are pointing guns at gao
edit: its a joke btw
It was not insulting enough the first 15 times he said "Listen to me". Had to turn it up a notch. Fun to see this comment section overflowing with 50c army though.
he's smart, and he's being frank.
Is nobody going to mention the reporter's awful fake tan?
Glass Heart Cry Bully : CCP Wolf Warrior Diplomacy
“Listen to me!” LOL this guy cracks me up!
Haha! and "I'm telling you"
Ppl like this only inflame relations for their own purposes, which we may not know. They don’t care about humanity or deserve attention but they got it unfortunately. I see this man as a psychotic nationalist. But at the same time I don’t want aussies to think this way. We need to trust our government can handle psychos like this guy.
thats because your anglo logic needs to start listening instead of blindly following your dumb narrative.
He's definitely a CCP member.
because your arrogant does not listen to anyone, but your closest allies, you all bring other countries into war.
Hate to burst Mr. Gao's buble, but nuclear missiles work fine when launched from diesel powered submarines. He need look no further than the mobile missile launchers on parade in Beijing to know that.
Then why buy nuclear!! Thats his point!
Yea, we know, the PLA Navy once operated them。What has this to do with anything?
@@rosebud4387 Because they stay underwater a long long time and never have to become a noise source by running a diesel engine to recharge batteries.
Australia if your are so proud of your ambition to defend Taiwan alongside USA..then your most welcome.
Australia is just being stupid to take the bait of US. China Australia can compliment each other in term of trade & benefit each other. In fact China never see Australia as threat, not until the Australia PM & it's politicians got some wire short circuited in their brains.
ok wumao
@@luwaimun6705 Yeah, stop watching so much CCP state run propaganda. Do you know that if China has not threatened Australia this never would have happened. Try watching some real news from around the world, not something controlled by your government. What a joke.... if Chyna so strong why haven’t they taken Taiwan back? Right not Taiwan is an independent country, doing what we they want. Why? Too weak, that’s why. Even the CCP isn’t stupid enough to attack.
@@rickjames18 if China is so weak, why is China a threat?
@@user-vv4df8cj2x Because even a pack of Hyenas can hurt a Lion from time to time.
What? That’s a threat. What a hypocrite.
No, it is simple logic.
We better take that threat seriously before we're humiliated by them.
@@samuraijosh1595 The threat is in becoming a nuclear state, that by its very nature necessitates a nuclear response should it become hostile.
MAD has made sure no country is a nuclear target for over 60 years.
China ,US ,EU and Russia know if they ever use Nukes first it game over for the planet.
Its suicide for two 1st world countries to go to war with each other. WW2 days are gone and never coming back, like Disco.
@@Crashed131963 While I agree that MAD is a powerful deterrence, MAD does not protect anyone from bumbling into a nuclear exchange, if one detects a nuclear capable missile fired from a vessel or a cruise missile that is known to have nuclear weapons capability, then prudence requires an appropriate response.
when the war begins america will abandon you australia, like they did in afghanistan
Yes History showed that America will be your Allie during the beginning of the conflict but will abandon you when you needed them the most. ie, Cuba, Vietnam, Iraq, .....recently. Afghanistan.
@@s711475 Cuba? The soviets moved nuclear weapons to an island off the coast of Florida
YOU HOPE COMMIE, 💀💣💥
@@vladtheimpaler9770 President Batista of Cuba was supported by the U.S.Then the U.S. dumped him when things were not going his way. The nuclear weapon from Russia came later when Fidel Castro became the president of Cuba.
Just like that? So the previous 20 years and trillions of dollars spent meant nothing?
Chinese Propaganda...
The logic that Australia needs to face the consequences if it arms with nuclear subs is more sound than the logic that Australia can do that but Indonesia, Malaysia, Russia, China, India and Pakistan should not be worry.
Worry party is for China.. It's already afraid of India now... So it won't even cross the line to attack Australia.. It knows what India will do of it...
This guy got fired up and very defensive. His body language tells a thousand words.
but that guy thinks this guy is naive so he told him do not BS with me.
Very fair.
You are spot on.
In this argument the other day on a BBC video a Chinese hack had an even bigger go claiming how the Chinese Navy (the PLAN) would blow America out of the water. She said America had no real combat experience since WW2 while China had several major sea battles that they had won. The claims she made were ignorant and absurd but also showed just how badly the Chinese people are about history. So I replied back about the real facts and what the actual numbers of aircraft carriers, destroyers, submarines,.... etc. each side actually has.
The Chinese do have nuclear subs but very few compared to America. Most of their subs are conventional power and out in the open ocean where staying submerged is an enormous advantage the Americans have a numerical superiority around 5:1. The Chinese have 2 aircraft carriers to America's 11 (soon to be 12). There was an Indian commentator a few months back who was a bit over the top but he made a valid point. The Chinese military is now made up of spoilt (1 child policy) brats with no combat experience. They are great at parades and bullying smaller nations but not much else.
The other day I saw a long play interview with an American strategist who said after all the failures of nation building exercises in the middle east Biden had set America back towards its real strength which is in the oceans. The Yanks have finally woken up to how much influence peddling the Chinese have done in the Pacific and are responding. AUKUS only pushes that further and its freaking the Chinese out. Because even after the tariffs that China imposed on Australian products Australia has basically said "We don't care and we aren't falling for any more of your BS" as we waved the middle finger.
@@tonywilson4713 Wow, very well said.
@@natelan69420 Thanks if there are people who need to watch what they are saying it *includes* people like Dr. Gao and others who think they can sabre rattle without any consequences.
People like Dr. Gao are just as stupid as the Trump supporters. We need to be careful here in Oz too we have these types as well. Need I mention Graig Kelly or Pauline Hanson or some of their tribe. 🤷♂️🤷♀️
@@tonywilson4713 Exactly, could not have put it better.
A nuclear power with proliferation record does not have the right to lecture another country that has yet to “go nuclear.” Choose another argument!
For those who don’t know. China is on a path to a much slower growth rate. That’s already started. Due to the limits of its previous growth model being reached and huge demographic problem (aging population). Their population is already shrinking and they have at least 90million empty dwellings. All this while they continue to build more and more new dwellings. It’s how they’ve tried to continue growing. I could go on. The bottom line is that they are stalling or at least slowing right down and will for a long Ike to come.
I’m not saying an economic collapse is certain anytime soon but I am saying that as things slow down they their government is having to make the people more and more nationalistic and eager for war. Their government is storing up trouble everywhere to get a reaction and to create a “foreign enemy” to rally the domestic Chinese around the flag and not focus on domestic problems.
All this will lead to an invasion of Taiwan. Whatever it costs the non ass hole countries we must help defend Taiwan.
There’s a window of a few years or decade before India is able to rival China where China will try to invade before their power falls too much relative to the west and India or Japan increasing military spending.
China in many ways is near its peak and is probably at its peak relative to the good guys.
If China was to take Taiwan the’d gain the technology of Taiwan and have open access to the pacific. We need to keep them contained.
They won’t win a conventional war when America is mobilised but they may use limited nuclear attacks in an effort to force a ceasefire on their terms when they start loosing. So it needs to be made clear to the CCP that any first use of nuclear weapons on their side will be met with the total destruction of their Eastern seaboard. If that is believed then we’ll win. If they think it’s another red line then every free society will loose.
loser！
Like a sand castle that got too tall, it will fall over by itself 🥰😂
Cut the crap. Australia was always a target. It's allied with the USA ffs. This is nonsense.
Admission of China's fear.
If Australia responded to China's coal import ban with an iron ore export ban China would literally collapse. You can't conjure steel and the dragon breathes it.
China is terrified
Mr. Gao makes a good argument for Australian Nuclear Proliferation. I'm not sure that that's his intention here. He might want to reconsider his remarks.
PS. Australias proposed nuclear subs are nuclear propelled, not nuclear armed.
IF you think China is so stupid to let OZ get away from their salami slicing games. From Nuclear sub to nuclear armed is just a small step away.
@@tweedy4sg Australia has every right to defend themselves from hostile foreign powers. China has been threatening everyone as of late and nuclear subs are a consequence of chinese aggression. You should back off now.
@@bcanuck has the Chinese finally started drone striking weddings and executing asylum seekers? post them viral clips yo!
such unjustified aggression would certainly feed a global backlash!
@@rabbitsforyang8273 just look at what China is doing to the Uighurs in Xinjiang, such a hot topic. There's videos of the camps and witness testimony and everything it's terrible.
@@tweedy4sg As if Normal Diesel powered subs cant carry nuclear warheads... Nuclear powered subs does not mean nuclear powered warheads. You dont need nuclear powered subs to launch nukes. Stop being dumb.
Mr Gaw is 100% right about Australia
This is What Arrogance and Hubris Looks Like.
And these China-Australia problems all started when Australia listened to Washingtons' orders, baffling that you purposefully agitated your number one customer and when they retaliated buy cutting their orders then you cried foul and ran to the deceiving arms of uncle Sam. In my country we treat our best customer with utmost respect and care, that's how business was done in the east.
"in my country we treat our best customer with utmost respect and care" , Chinas best customer is the USA. does china treat the US with utmost respect and care? Second is Hong Kong. How is the utmost respect and care going in Hong Kong? How about its third biggest trade partner, Japan? IS flying into their airspace with military planes and running military vessels in their waters qualify as utmost respect and care? how about constantly threatening them with war?
Talking out the side of your mouth.
@@Rade8404 When US invaded Iraq and bombed other dozen countries did China say anything? Nope. China knew it was not it's matter to engage, that's called respect. While US keeps digging their nose into China's internal issues. Is that not being disrespectful? Hong Kong is a part of China that was occupied by British forcefully as a lease after China was humiliated and broken by the western powers and Japan. China is just making sure there won't be another '100 years of humiliation'. And historically Japan has done worse to China than what Hitler did in Europe. But Japan have not formally apologised to China for the atrocities and massacre done multiple times. China is like a school kid who was bullied by classmates for a long time but now is building up courage, physical attributes, learning combat sports and becoming confident. Btw how many countries have China invaded in past 50 years? And how many countries have US and it's allies invaded and bombed in the last 50 years? That says who us the aggressor.
@@Rade8404 Google "Boxer rebellion, Nanjing massacre and Unequal treaty."
@@teps168 your whataboutisms wont work here. It does nothing to absolve china of its crimes against humanity.
@@Rade8404 hmm crimes against humanity...who died? as oppose to western countries whose atrocities can fill up a whole library. ;)
No one:
China: You're on the list now!
Did you forget that Australia bought nuclear submarines, majorly escalating tensions? You conveniently left out he most important piece of information.
@@ckn56 I reckon name the sub “Chernobyl 2” that will stir the pot a bit more
The US, UK, and Australia: China may sell nuclear-powered subs to Iran, Cuba, etc.
@@ckn56 Australia reserves the right to choose its defence policy.
@@warnpassion Just because Australia can, does not mean there aren't consequences.
How absurd! Having nuclear submarine makes it a target? Gao is provocative is making such statement.
Having a nuke submarine is against the non nuke proliferation treaty
@@jinliu3719 so.. China already had nuclear submarines ..and now Australia just want the same..?
Why is that such a problem?
Are Australia not allowed to match China in war-equipment???
@@SirAser.F__k.you.Google China is the five permanent members of the UN and has the right to possess nuclear weapons, while Australia is not. If Australia can have nuclear submarines, why can't Iran? The purity of raw materials in the power of nuclear submarines can theoretically be used as nuclear weapons.
@@SirAser.F__k.you.Google well, Iran, N. Korea, Venezuela, Cuba in that case should have if Australia have them, right 😂?
@@hi4806 Maybe China should think about the huge responsibility, that is resting on the shoulder of a permanent member of the UN - towards the rest of the world?! - As a permanent member you are supposed to lead the way and show the way ..to peaceful coexistence!!! ..not the hostile oppression, we see now! ..but by peaceful means?!!
What we have seen so far is not worth following - it is pure oppression and old-fashioned dictatorship.
If China wants us all to start respecting them, they should turn around and change their style completely and not just repeat the idiocy that led to World War II.
In SO MANY WAYS, China look like Hitler's germany before WW2. ...by repeating the same pattern, we all know so well....
You talk about 'the rights to own nuclear power'.. But before Rights, comes duties... Duties to lift the responsibility to keep the peace - not the right to build a dictatorship, by using it!
On the question on why Iran can't manage this responsibility is quite simple - it's clear to everyone, how unstable the country is ..how much grudge and hatred they maintain towards the rest of the free world.
The CCP mouth piece, Victor Gao, tried to confuse people saying that a nuclear-powered submarine is a nuclear weapon. But people are not that stupid as Mr. Gao.
lol you are too gullible and have no critical thinking
Victor Gao is being realistic. Why would Australia wants to step in that direction and jeopardise its own nuclear-free status that it has been advocating to its neighbours for decades? When you see a question “ 1 + 1 = ? “ you don’t need to see the written answer to know it’s “2”.
no he is trying to explain to the stupid people geopolitically countries operate on the assumption other countries with unmonitored HEU have nuclear weapons. This is literally the same concern raised by a whole bunch of SEA countries like Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, etc. Right now if a missile is launched from Australia, countries will not suspect it carries a nuclear warhead. Once Australia possess unmonitored HEU, there would be a chance it carries a nuclear warhead, prompting a nuclear response
@@thlim1460 To face with an crazy China. We need a strong weapon. Remember When Australia announced to have investigation about Coronavirus and China is the one threating us day by day. It is just right time for Australia to wake up to fight with crazy and bully mafia. Every words from the mouth of this D Gao are full of violence and stupidity.
@@cy20998 they are too dumb to understand this very simple logic
This guy has studied his government supplied text books well. A+, son.
Yeah the ignorance and stupidity of this clown is that Australia has been a nuclear target for decades - its called *Pine Gap.*
Its one of America's most important communications installations along with its counterpart in Britain.
The Russians, Chinese and any others might ignore the rest of Australia but Pine Gap is near the top of the first strike list for all of them. There's no if, but, or maybe if you want to blind the Americans and take away their satellite communications Pine Gap is one of those places that must be taken out.
OK. Glad to know the threat comes from China government and not illusion of a scholar
western propaganda vs eastern propaganda
@@gaogaomugaogaomu9297 Yeah Mate, Tony Wilson nailed it. This is well known in Australia. A Russian Government Official in the 1980's told the Australian People directly through an Australian TV interview that we were directly targeted and not just at Pine Gap, but at every strategic population centre including my small home town because it had a deep water port. The Yanks covet Pine Gap like it's their firstborn and took down our elected government in 1975 to protect it. The Chinese Gov, directly threatened us with war last year because we wanted transparency from China on the Covid release. We know all about the squeeze superpowers put on smaller nations. Don't try to piss on us and tell us it's raining.
@@VynetteLisa1 lol, yeah right, and had nothing to do with scomo actively campaigning against Huawei? had nothing to do with the foreign interference law? had nothing to do with kicking Chinese investment out of Australia? don't confuse effect with cause.
In other words he is saying Australia should trust that China and remain a sitting duck for China.
the US won't help you. try to get with your neighbours. It helps.
Despite what your media says, it was Australia who provoked China not the other way round. Why would Australia be target of China? It is an insignificant country.
Australia is not Taiwan
@@JH-jz1sd Scomo is making AU a lesser TaiWan
If they get ahold of Taiwan. Japan and Australia will be their next targets for military strategic reasons to dominate the world
China and Russia: hey Iran how about we offer to sell you nuclear submarines ‘with no intention to support your nuclear capacity wink wink’
Exactly. White supremacy always trying to dictate what other can and can't do. Whilst doing what ever they want. Unfortunately for China, its all on its own. All Asian countries hate one another while all white countries, except maybe Russia, are allies regardless of their past. And most Asian countries also idolize the whites/USA. So China should not play ball so hard. It will not play out well for its country and people and economy. China has made great progress in its development in the last 30 years. It would be a shame if they make a wrong turn and go to war. All the progress with the rest of the world and new silk road would be for nothing.
go ahead lol see what iseral does lmaooo
@@northsidedanglers507 Then turkey and Egypt will follow the pursuit. that’s the point every country go nuclear after escalation of Australia armament deal lol there’ll be no treaty agreement about restricting nuclear proliferation
@@northsidedanglers507 Israel might not want to get involved if Russian or Chinese citizens are involved or Hezbollah might just find some new toys.
he's being so ambiguous, he's not even answering the question, it's like he's reading off a script
Talks cheep china don't want war especially they know they cabt win
@@nedred703 yeah, especially after the ukusas coalition forces won in Afghanistan, hopeless 😂😂!
@@cryptohornbill9658 usa could have won the war in afghanistan in 7 to 10 days and it would have been a total annihilation of the taliban and those who are behind this proxy war (iran) and nobody incuding china would be able stop them because usa is the boss
@@nedred703 they lost, did they waste trillions with an intention of loosing 😂😂😂😂, lol!
@@cryptohornbill9658if trump was in charge believe me iran and its proxy soilders the taliban would have payed dearly for killing those U.S marines but trump did the right thing for withdrawing now the dirtbags can sort themselves out personally I think the world would be a nicer place if america dropped the big one and wiped out 90%-of the middle east
The most stupid thing i heard about this nucsub is that Aussies insisted saying it's a nuc-sub not nuc-missle, so it's not a nuc-weapon. Oh please, if I point an empty gun to your head and I say there's no bullet so the gun is not a weapon, what would you think about that?? Simply say, Aussies really short with the brains and logics.
I love these Beijing spokesmen 😂 😂 😂
Could conflict between China and the West be avoided if the Taiwanese people, for those so inclined, were allowed to migrate on mass to Australia and possibly other countries? After all, Australia needs to grow its population for developmental reasons.
I support the One-China policy and recognise that some Taiwanese are happy to accept mainland rule while others are not. For those that are not, they should have the option of leaving Taiwan for Australia, or somewhere else, especially if that will help prevent conflict between China and the West.
The US will not defend Taiwan because it supports the One China policy which means it recognises the territory of the former as being an indivisible part of China. This means the US believes that China is not committing an act of aggression against an independent or foreign nation by asserting its authority over the island.
So, the question becomes, what chance have the Taiwanese got in a fight against its vastly larger and better armed neighbour? The outcome is obvious and so it is really a matter of saving as many lives as possible that is the real issue here. That can be achieved by allowing those who do not wish to live under the rule of the Communist Party to leave and become citizens of some other democracy, such as Australia.
Upholding Chinese sovereignty does not have to result in a massive loss of life on both sides of the Taiwan Strait in a military conflict that would also result in significant material destruction and environmental damage to both sides, and to any other nations choosing to involve themselves.
A peaceful outcome that is in line with the beliefs of the democracies of this world concerning the sanctity of human life can be achieved in a manner consistent with allowing the democratic aspirations of the Taiwanese to live on, all be it, in another country or countries who are similarly committed to the same way of life.
There does not have to be armed conflict between the West and China. There is another way to resolve the Taiwanese matter.
Its not that easy mate. Its traditional and cultural idea that the han taiwanese and taiwanese in general should at least try to defend their ancestral lands from both their own and foreigners abroad. Its quite complicated to evacuate nor flee and realistic the mainlanders also don't want the to support ccp rule in taiwan as they know it will destroy most of their resources, livelyhoods and families both within china and abroad.
The CCP exiled the Chinese Nationalist government to Taiwan where Chinese culture survived free from the return of feudal control of the Chinese people on the mainland.""? Chinese people consider themselves Chinese wherever they are the real issue is the one CCP policy pretending to be one China policy.
Very logical..
I am confused, is that guy trying to help getting China out of conflict by threading the Aussies. Or he trying to mobilize the world to a path to isolate China?
Communist China is on a warpath, to deny the obvious is stupid.
That is irrelevant.
@@Iloveyounot What china are is one thing. How should the world react to China, is the difficult question.
@@veda9151 👌
China is one of the five nuclear weapons states (NWS) recognized by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which China ratified in 1992. China is the only NWS[38] to give an unqualified security assurance to non-nuclear-weapon states:
"China undertakes not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States or nuclear-weapon-free zones at any time or under any circumstances."[39]
Chinese public policy has always been one of the "no first use rule" while maintaining a deterrent retaliatory force targeted for countervalue targets.[1]
@@Iloveyounot yeah, if the US insist on forging a new enemy for themself, china will stand up to be a capable one
That was a strange interview.
Threatening Australia or belittling us based on our military treaties isn't going to make anyone here opposed to nuclear-powered subs or agree with him.
I would have thought someone in his position would have a better understanding of his audience/target and how to frame his arguments
Just mad with dangerous overconfidence nothing else...they have managed to piss off all the important countries around them who control vital sea lanes. the reason they think they can get away with everything is for their treaty with Russia and the vast oil + mineral reserves of it. same thing happened with ww2 Germany who misjudged their own powers. But on the flip side, they are definitely gonna try to sell those newest Type 093B nuclear attack subs to countries on friendlier terms to spite Aus and US. That in turn may call for more armament from Australia and India. Not sure thins is going to simmer down anytime soon...
Being a party man through and through, he is probably incapable of walking in anyone else's shoes or seeing any other perspectives (Taiwanese, Australian, Japanese, Vietnamese, Filipino, Indian or American.)
It's just all Woof Warrior diplomacy now. There's no logic or smartness behind their answers. Gao is a party member and his views are that of CCP. He's making threat towards Australia but he doesn't have the balls to admit that his threat is also representing China's threat since People's daily already threatening Australia earlier from Australia wanting to investigate China for Coronavirus.
Stan states nuclear powered isn't the same as nuclear weaponry, Gao snickers and implies that there will be nuclear weaponry. So does that mean countries that have nuclear powerplants also violate the non-proliferative treaty? F*cking imbecile. His scare tactics and warmongering may work for domestic audiences, but not for Australians.
@@SwarleySwablu I hope so. That was the most condescening threat I have ever heard from a legitimate government. Guess you guys lose your "privilege" to have any nuclear reactions in your country. Good thing that the entire US Fleet shows up for Tawain. They will show up for you too.
@who cares So true... Japan would own the entire coast of China had it not been for the Allies and Americans dropping the atomic bomb on Japan.
Where's the gratitude, China?
Australia inviting troubles for it self . Peace should prevail
Peace through strength and that’s the only way
South east Asia states never invite troubles but communist threat comes to us.
Trade with you does not means must kowtow .
Who is the aggressor.
Panda Xi n company....
Self reliance plus hardware from USA n UK , technology transfer ,ccp are worried on.
lets be frank here. You don't buy nuclear sub and not ask for nuclear bomb that comes along with it. Australia has the right to defend it self but so do any other country, that being said, China now has their bomb also aiming at the land of Australia and well as any nations that has their bomb aiming at China. The street runs both ways. But how does this get here. Australia was making so much money from trading with China. They are just a few countries that actually has a big trade surplus with China. How does the Australia media and the Morrisson government suddenly make full turn and decide China (my best and biggest customer) is my enemy? How does you kill your golden goose that lays you the golden egg? I can understand why US is not on a good term with China since China is making so much money from US. You really need to put all the piece on the table and think why, how and who benefits from this situation?
Why? Because of covid. China thinks the world doesn't want to know where it came from. The bill always comes due.
"LISTEN TO ME!"
Seriously?
I would have laughed at the goon several times over the course of his speech. Watching him get all fired up when confronted with simple, legitimate questions was priceless.
His bosses must be proud.
He is a good representation of how the CCP is thinking now. They really to want to flash nuke weapons to scare countries so they use these hacks like Gao to pass on the message.
Goa should have given up smoking years ago. His breathlessness sounded painful
Seriously, kangaroo has big ears but small brains. They cant comprehen which Victor was saying. The message was Plain and simple BUT it had to be repeated multiple times.
The skull must be pretty thick and hard.
@@mmore7285 you are as thick as Victor champ. Can't spell, tries to insult but only to get laughed at. He was being goaded for a reaction which was hilarious to watch.
and he couldn't answer properly, i'd hate to hear his translations! lol be scarey lol
So, based on the threats from China, Australia should deploy nuclear missile, not subs, China also needs to understand that China is also the target of other countries's nuclear attacks! let's be equal.
@Crescent Sun how about Japan and Korea
Convicts don’t seem to understand when you get in the water you will get wet. 😂
Australia is heading for big trouble.
You're heading for a dead end.
Australia will less money in 2035 Bankrupt in 2050. Lawrence are useless.
@@ongchinlam3192 your English is laughable. What are you trying to say? At least try to use Google Translate.
That’s singlish. Beautiful language.
@@choolikyoon9939 singlish? I thought it was chinglish.