Ruger Super Redhawk: full disassembly & assembly

The Super Redhawk is a line of double-action magnum revolvers made by Sturm, Ruger beginning in 1987, when Ruger started making weapons using larger, more powerful cartridges such as .44 Magnum, .454 Casull, and .480 Ruger.
The Super Redhawk was introduced late in 1987, in .44 Magnum with 7.5- and 9.5-inch barrel lengths. The final product used the same trigger design and same grip panels as the .357 Magnum GP100, but had a larger, stronger frame with integrated scope bases. The Super Redhawk received positive reviews, edging out similar offerings from Smith & Wesson in accuracy and price.
The Super Redhawk was only available in stainless steel with a number of finishes. The standard finish is brushed steel, with a semi-gloss look. Polished, high-gloss versions have also been offered, though this option is not currently available. Stainless steel one-inch scope rings are included, using the standard Ruger lockup common to all Ruger integral bases. These rings easily allow removing the scope from the handgun, without significantly altering zero, or eye-relief, once the scope is re-installed. The Super Redhawk uses different front and rear rings, with the rear ring being shorter than the front ring due to differences in frame height. Ruger Model 77 bolt-action rifles also use a higher ring in the rear than in the front.
en.wikipedia.o...
How a Ruger Super Redhawk works
• How a Ruger Super Redh...
Don't try to recreate what you see in this video, as this is gameplay. This video was created using the game World of Guns:
store.steampowe...
This game is also available on Google Play, App Store, Amazon and other platforms.

[@mikemild13]

Great video, as are all on this site. Very informative and helpful.

[@slayednpked1]

Amazing video

[@johnkellmer5133]

That trigger complex is complex!! I was curious to see this because I wanted to know how my GP100 was put together. I'm now very glad Ruger's customer service is so good. But, having seen how well and tightly seated the smaller parts are within the larger, I'm not concerned. Durability and reliability are functions of design and construction and quality control. I think Ruger passes all the tests. Thanks.

[@Jeffersonian1]

This video should also apply to the GP100 and SP101, which I believe are mechanically identical.

[@brandonbowerstx]

Excellent video.

[@thalison..]

CZ 83?
disassembly & assembly and how a CZ 83 works

[@Rod1Malkin]

Wow! Bravo!!