Dream on, S500 can intercept fighters from 3600km range, check the new missiles that is has and they use small uranium war heads in them. The US has no functional air defenses. Do you have an idea of what S500 does? it's a game changer, range 3600km, and 350+ km altitude, in 2019 they tried against a meteorite with speed 67,000+ km and destroyed it. Russia didn't use their modern air defenses yet like s300, s400, s500, s550 and puk 3
After last April’s missile exchange, Russia supplied Iran with S400/500 air defense systems along with most advanced “radar jamming” systems. If US/Israel attacks Iran many fighter/bomber jets will be downed. Manned jet fighters are rapidly becoming obsolete in todays war theater.
S500 is still in pre production state. Production will begin at 2022 and probably last few years. I would predict that s500 will enter service somewhere around 2026-2030. Until then s400 is capable of defending any threat. Stealth technology is absolutely overrated. Russians have radars that detect baloons for kids that otherwise is invisible to any radar. No f35 or f22 is going to be undetected. It will be imediately found intercepted either with own jets or ground to air strike and goodbye f35.
But Europe and USA don't want peace they just see their interest. When they see someone is growing faster than their countries in economy they start war against that country. Now they are targeting Chinese and Russian economy. Love to Russia from Pakistan.
@@ScubaShark--8964 Canadian National quantum radar. Canadian National is a freight rail company in Canada that has equipped their locomotives with anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic missle systems to protect against foreign forces. The quantum radar is the advanced radar system that detects airborn threats.
We kicked them out of the F-35 program because that was how putin was trying to get ahold of the F-35 radar data. We're not going to give putin an F-35, are you stupid? Erdogan is just Putins pathetic puppet. We sanctioned them because Erdogan is committing genocide and getting cozy with Iran. Stop watching Russian propaganda.
@@markopostic7066 You don't have to support Russia, but when several countries are geopolitically tied together, it's to everyone's advantage to realize that and to act accordingly.
Also all missles were stopped if it wasn't for american refuelling capabilities and baby sitting to make sure they didn't enter the dangerous air space they would have shot them out of the sky and captured soldiers operators they did not want that before November 5th
@@616CC Apparently for Turkey army S400 have problem with radar over 5km altitude . ( Lose 40% of range ). " The head of the Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed the fact that the S-400 missiles acquired from Russia have not yet been put into operation. Russian sources and the media, however, report the existence of a problem identified by the Turkish army, which it has not been able to resolve for about six months."
Don't be drag into it, because it's only propoganda against Turkey from EU because most of EU countries are not happy with this deal or they start shewering from it that's why
But it also showed Turkey is a devil, it is against America but ally of Germany. Americans know very well, only germany insisted Turkey to join NATO or even EU. No other nations are that stupid about Turkey which fights with Greece
At such a G force a pilot may well wake-up a week later without even knowing where he's at. It appears that the human body can safely take up to a 9G acceleration. Anything beyond that is just too much.
@@rthelionheart yeah but more the speed, the more will be the value of G on a flyong object so jets maximum could have sharp turns at 2 to 2.5 mach and missiles take the same turn at 5 to 6 mach so that's why value of G is tripled for missiles. A pilot at 2 mach if gets 9G the missile at mach 6 foe the same turn will have to sustain 27G atleast
You didn't allow for Russia sinking every aircraft carrier before an F35 could take off. America has lost every war so far mainly because they attack 1000s of miles from home and against countries who are protecting their land.
I think the Russian's deploy anti cruise missile systems on the frontline. The SA400 radar can see cross broads and know the attacking aircraft location and know where early warning aircraft location.
You have it just perfect, by targeting the support assets the s400 comes into its own It has no chance with f35 but can isolate f35 from tankers and awacs limiting it's usefulness
Can detect on 100 km but can't lock and track for attack , max range of tracking a tipik target (f-15 16 and other 4 gen ) it's 150 km , for stealth target's track range it's more shorter than 100km
laws of physics the realistic detection range of an s400 radar for a stealth f35 is 34 km which is too late since the F35 will have blown up the site from over 100kms away
Are you aware of the situation in Syria where Israel's F-35 stealth cannot fly easily over that airspace without actually getting an escort from a commercial plane
@@marlmyster so you believe that story pushed by Russian propaganda machine.. Isreal already demonstrated that S300 and S400 defense systems are useless.
There is no such thing as "fly low to the ground to avoid detection" anymore. After a private small plane landed on the Red Square it was tasked to create a radar that can. Tomahawks failed in Syria with S-75/125 protecting it, connected to S-400 radars and AWACS.
Don’t forget the info u hve access to is what u are allowed to see. U don’t know what is possible. U also don’t know what is fake these days as you were not on the ground in Syria. One side says they hit one says they blocked. Truth we don’t know. We weren’t there
В 90-х самолёт приземлился не потому что его невидимом, как раз наоборот, его видели и могли сбить. А потому что была дана команда предателем Горбачевым его не сбивать, чтобы потом уволить тех генералов которые могли затеять бунт против Горбачева и смести его, что бы Горбачев продолжил свое дело по развалу Великой страны. Здрасьте, мы ВЕРНУЛИСЬ!!!😆😆😆
S-400 is often supported by EW systems, like Krasukha-4, which will further complicate things for attacking side. There is too many variables involved, so it is impossible todetermine how things will hapen. But one thing is for sure, nothing is invincible. They should organise war games to test the systems out for real 😂😂😂
@@callisto537 в нагорном Карабахе уничтожен с300п 1980 года выпуска, который был оставлен без поддержки ЗРК среднего и малого радиуса поражения, находился постоянно в одном месте, и имел плохо обученный экипаж.
Good luck human pilot on trying to beat the A.I system planted in the s400😂😂😂😂.If the pilot can dodge that then he/she can beat the A.I at chess on very hard-hardcore mode😂😂😂😂
@khlopzi The ones fired by Himars being destroyed with predictable regularity by the Russians in the Ukraine. The F35 is junk, that will be destroyed by Russia, as it has destroyed all the other US supplied overpriced junk in the Ukraine. Particularly given previous 'stealth' was shot down in Yugoslavia by technology predating the S300 system.
bro f-35 is not used in ukraine war and any shooting of the russian planes who entered ukranian territory are by pattriot missile system or anti aircraft missile system's also the shooting of russian air bases are done by unmanned drone's which might be stopped by s-500 but I am not sure also s-500 has not entered mass production
They flew back and forth over the SAM's every night for a very long time, and none of them were able to engage them. They did not even dare turning their radars on for long each time because it painted them as target by the aircrafts. But, yes, one battery commander was lucky enough to get a propper lock on one of the F-117's as it opened its bomb bay doors as this messed up its stealth profile while being rather close to the battery. He fired 2x missiles and managed one miss and a strafe hit, damaging it enough to make it go down. Yes, this shows stealth is no magic. But neither is these Russian batteries. Not then, not today.
@@KjetilBalstad So wrong. We hit another one with S-125 Neva, but he mannaged to land in Bosnia. We even shot down B-2 Spirit of Missoury. He crashed in Croatia, just across the border in Spachvan woods. NATO troops are sealed whole area and took next 3 months parts and soil in sealed trucks. Croatish firefighters are describe that they saw huge black objekt crashed in fire with no vertical surfaces. Then have come NATO soldiers and blocks the whole area. After that, US have staged crash od Spirit of Cansas using one of two test B2 they wasn't operational. After thet, they just switch sign on Spirit od Cansas in Spirit of Missoury and covered everything up.
@@djokicadjokic6375 How is what I wrote wrong? Just watch the interview with the battery commander. He said they did not dare activation their radars for more than 20 sec each time because the US quickly engaged active radars. But, the Serbs did have some skill, intelligence, and they got lucky. The US stealth bombers flew the same routes back and forth over these batteries over and over, and probably relied a little to much on the technology, making it easier for the Serbs to plan a trap. And, this particular trap actually failed two times before they managed to shoot one down. The Serbs had discovered that using long range early warning radars set at the lowest bandwidth possible they could detect the F-117 at 25km, a very poor detection range given its 370km detection range on ordinary fighters. But, they did at least get some indications that the F-117 was on its way. They also had intelligence revealing that the Prowler electronic warfare birds ordinarily supporting the F-117 were grounded, and that the F-117s were going to fly regardless. This, paired with the US fighter’s tendency to fly the same routes over and over, enabled the Serbs to relocate their SAM's to an expected flight path and ready their systems for the next sortie. However, with the early warning radar they could just about detect that there was something in the air, but nothing more. To shoot it down they need a weapons grade track. For this they had to use the S-125 radar systems. The target acquisition C-band radar that usually detected aircraft out to about 240km could not see the F-117 at all, so they were left with the fire control radar that usually was used to guide the missiles to their target. They already had this radar pointed exactly at the expected patch of the F-117 when they got the notice from the early warning systems that the F-117 was on its way. And they activated this exactly at the right time to optimize any chance of a lock. But this time, just as the two previous attempts, they could not get a lock at all. However, now the lucky part comes into play. Because they knew the Prowlers were grounded, they decided that they could probably activate the radar once more, without risking being engaged themselves. Just as they activated the radar the second time, the F-117 was preparing to drop its ordinance, and his weapon bays were open exposing its easily detectable bomb bay interior. At this point the F-117 was only 8km away, and they fired at least two missiles at the aircraft. Another thing to point out is the fact that the F-117 has no actual radar or even missile warning systems activated, as the design required it being free of the necessary external components for such a system. So, the pilot had no warning systems cueing him that missiles had been fired his way, and only eventually saw the missiles heading straight at him. Of the two missiles fired the first actually buffeted the F-117 without detonating, most likely because its proximity trigger was unable to detect the aircraft. The second missile missed, but the proximity trigger did detect and detonate the missile causing fragment and blast damage crippling the aircraft ability to maneuver, forcing the pilot to eject. This is the fully disclosed and confirmed series of events leading up to the successful downing of a single F-117. There is no indications or proof what so ever that an B-2 was actually shot down. And, given the kill chain described above, the operational altitude of the B-2, the difference in operational procedures, the B-2’s much more capable stealth surfaces also deflecting lower band radar emissions, I find it highly unlikely that such an attack was even attempted.
The strategy to beat the s400 system is to remotely fly expendable throw-away air crafts into enemy territory. When fired upon this would reveal the location of the s400 system as well as the launch vehicles. Fly as many throw away aircrafts as it takes to deplete the enemies missile inventory.
@@debbies3763 Fabricated story. A tiny aircraft jamming a high powered warship that also has jamming technology? Really? The aircraft was detected miles in advance.
@@edwinyax1850 BS. The Israelis used swarms in the Bekaa Valley to get Russian SAMs to light up so they could promptly annihilate them. Study EW and get back to us.
The s500 is still under development hell and is facing a lot of problems It's kinda like the f-35 of air defense systems, but without the budged of the US military that can just throw money at the problem until it goes away
The new anti radiation missile that the Northrop Grumman's Orbital ATK is developing is a must have in a F-35's inventory. This new missile called AARM-ER has a classified range and speed, but given that the current AARM has a range of over 150km and speed of over Mach 2, it's safe to say that the new missile will have the range outside the envelope non stealthy jets can be targeted, meaning over 300 km, and speeds of Mach 3 and above. These missiles for now will be loaded on Growlers which will be an incredibly deadly platform when they receive the NGJ or Next generation jammer pods. In the end, nobody knows how any of the advertised systems would work until they're combat tested. That's why we can say with certainty that Tomahawks work, JDAMS, Abrams, Javelin, etc... On the other hand stealth vs counter stealth technology was never tested against a near peer adversary. Their weapons manufacturers claim they can detect and track US stealth jets. Our defense companies and weapons designers claim that the Raptors and F-35s were specifically designed to counter advanced SAM systems. We can all bitch and moan in the comment sections of various internet sights, but any normal person would hope that we never get to a point where these highly advanced weapons systems go head to head.. In the end, if one side finds itself in a desperate situation where their conventional forces are beaten and the danger of unconditional surrender approaches, then nuclear weapons will fly and all bets are off. Then it won't matter if you have 50 or 200 B-21 Raider bombers or wheather you have S-400 or S-700 super duper system that can detect a fly on the other side of the Earth. Hundreds of millions will die within 20 minutes while the ones who survive will wish they've died instantly....
The has lowered the standards on the F35 to the point that the F16 is king. A general stated the F35 has 209 ways to kill a pilot, they never have solved the problem with the oxygen system at high altitudes causing the pilot to pass out. Russia routinely practice’s at 40 thousand feet and they have hypersonic missiles
just to remind you, a "super duper" S-500 recently shot down a satellite. so i wouldn't call them "super duper" as they have a real potential to take down some "super duper" American satellites, and I don't mean just the stupid a** Starlink units by Elon Musk.
@@Piotrus31492 all shit aside. Let's fucking try it ... USA ain't scared of a all bullshit talk country Russia blah blah blah who got beat by talibans with slippers and stones🤣🤣🤣 bring it!!!! Fuck!!! Russia China and bullshit North Korea.. ask Trump!!! When the wolf comes growling at the door you best be ready! with all that talk! the eagles will come raining on you and putin will be just another Sadam running for his life
I use to work at s400 production plant i can assure you that 1 quart of fabuloso when mopping the floor makes invasive odors virtually undetectable using a 200mm mop handle
Since my both parents earned pensions doing this technology I will tell you firstly that current STEALTH technology has no chance against S-400 system, up to one percent, and would have a REALLY tough time against S-300 system, up to eight percent, I will take my time and take a critical look at your video.
Haha, what ever the result F35 attacking S400 directly, one thing for sure..the.airport base where these F35 launched/departed wont be there for them to land when/if they get back..
wait what? where's the f-35 stealth capabilities? if it has to attack an s-400 flying low and then pull up to launch with gliding bombs with the risk of also being detected and get shot down by manpads missiles.
@@grndzro777 that doesnt really mean much, the thing about stealth is not to be invisible but to be hard to detect and to track, like yeah there are certain radars that can detect an f-35 but the hard part is not to detect it but to get it's specific location and then be able to get a target lock and guide the misile to it and destroy it, all of that is far harder than it looks Like maybe the SAM site can indeed detect the f-35, but if it can only detect it at 50 kilómeters which is less than the f-35s weapons range them there is a high posibility that by the time the aircraft is detected it has already completed it's mission, also maybe you can detect it but it's radar signature is soo tiny that it's really dificult to get a target lock on it, you only know "something is there in that general direction, idk what it is but it's there" without a weapons lock detection is useless because you can't engage the target, and maybe you launch a misiles but the misile radar fails to detect the f-35, or you manage to get a hit but it was a decoy, of the active protection systems of the f-35 fuck with the radar systems of the misile or the misile site and it fails to hit There are a lot of variables that just having a more powerful or better radar will not fix Also don't forget that capabilities are usually exagerated for propaganda reasons, the s400 has never proved itself against a stealth fighter for a reason, if it where to actually shot it down the reputation of stealth fighters as "invincible" aces of the sky would disapear but if the s400 where to fail to pick it's target and be destroyed then the reputation of it as the "stealth killer" air defense system would also disapear, and better not to test any of those theories
@@carso1500 That's the problem. F117/B2/F22/F35 are all completely visible to L band. It's how that 60's era system shot down an F117. They tuned the radar frequency. By it's nature L band isn't very accurate so several are needed to get an accurate lock. This means that the system is specifically designed to be networked, and use all angles. Protivnik has a low frequency range of 400 miles. F35 would probably be detected around 300 miles, and the new SU57 has L band integrated in the wings. Russia might have even better range than that with the newer systems. All they need is a semi accurate confirmation and they can send out the Vympel R-37M's On top of that Russia is ahead in EW systems. They disabled the Donald Cook with two large EW pods in 2014, and have ground based systems that can knock out low orbit satellites. Even if we fire a missile if the site is protected by Krasukha EW it won't reach the target. And that was in 2014. Russia has advanced a lot since then. And on top of ALL of that China is sharing it's Divine Eagle 2 drone tech with Russia. Those can detect stealth at long ranges. Don't take anything here as confrontational. I am really enjoying the conversation. You make a lot of really good points.
@@grndzro777 thats not at all how the f117 was shot down, another guy wrote a full disclosure on how that happened and to be sincere i don't really want to rewrite it all But i can give a short resume The shot down of the f117 was basically pure luck and Bad strategy based on the united states, the soviet systems used where completly uncapable of tracking the stealth plane, they could kind of know that it was there but only at like at a 5 km range and getting a lockdown was imposible, the shot down was a combinations of factors like the airplane flying alone that day because it's escorts where grounded, that it was flying through the same path so they where prepared and in the área, and that just when they activated the radar the f117 had just opened up their bomb bay which reduces it's stealth capabilities, they threw two missiles both failed to get a lock down but one of them was lucky enough to just barely hit the plane and cause enough damage to force the pilot to eject Regardless to say the f117 flew for other 10 years going against similar systems and said incident was never repeated once on it's whole history, with the combination of factors that was basically a golden shot So no L band can't detect a stealth plane any more than any other radar, it's not some magic stealth killer, it requieres a lot of luck to pull something like that
@@carso1500 that's not true, because the Serbs hit at least two of the f117-s, probably more. The other one was badly damaged and decommissioned right after the mission. USA has also acknowledged that but only 20 years after the event.
C 400 will be covered at the bottom with a Shell C, and at the middle level of the Beech M1 and C 300. C 400 will definitely not stand alone, like a forgotten shovel in the field.)
I'm not reassured by this video, in fact, the opposite. The disparity between the capabilities in delivery vehicles and anti-missile defense between the US and Russia has become disturbingly great at this point.
Descent video, short, concise pretty much covers most of the major points. However, there is a difference between detecting the F35 and engaging it with a high quality track. F35 would probably launch it's weapons well out of their trackable range. It would ultimately be a matter of how many incoming missiles and bombs S400 could intercept, and who runs out of ammo first. Lastly, something to consider that makes things highly unquantifiable in this kind of scenario is that being able to datalink targeting information between nodes on both sides of the fight. That being possible could and will spawn some interesting tactics on both sides of the fight.
Yep. Each squad of 3-5 F35s will have an accompanying 3-5 Boeing drones flying with them. Meaning possibly 25 aircraft will be coming for these s400 installations. All it takes is one of these aircraft to hit the s400. Once that happens the F15, F16 and F18 all can come in and destroy any other infrastructure. The point of stealth has always been to destroy radar and anti aircraft infrastructure. Out 4th generation fighters are still superior in every way to stealth planes. They simply are too easy to detect and shoot down. However once the stealth destroys the ability to detect and shoot down aircraft then the 4th generation fighters can rain down hell upon the enemy.
US never wants Russia China India collaborate and unite in peace because they know Nato can't stand a chance infront Russia China India combined 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
There is one critical flaw in this video's military situation. The situation is missing the fact that when Russians use missiles, they use multiple missiles at the same time similar to how Russian Battlecruiser Peter the Great uses its missiles. It will be just as difficult for multiple F35s to evade incoming S500 missiles as it would be difficult for Russians to hit the actual F35s rather than decoys and drones. F35 squadron's dilemma will be whether S500 batteries that just shot bunch of missiles are priority targets or the incoming supersonic and hypersonic missiles are higher priority. S500 batteries or incoming supersonic and hypersonic missiles. That decision must be made within minutes since hypersonic will reach decoys, drones and F35s in 2 to 3 minutes which is not enough time for F35 pilots brains to process. It can be overwhelming. Even if S500 batteries are hit and destroyed, here come the supersonic and especially hypersonic missiles. Not just a few but dozens of them. It will be suicidal for both Russian S500 battalion and F35 squadron.
The F-35 planes cannot confront the S-400 except in the case of wireless communication between them and the leadership and the rest of the supporting planes, but what will happen if the planes lose contact with each other?? Here, electronic warfare and jamming devices will play a big role, the Russians are not underestimated in this field
Well, jamming won't work because S400 has a feature called frequency jumping in split of the second and can expose aircraft or any jamming device defenceless. For now there's no way to evade the S400
Massively incorrect, just ask Israel. While yes it’s *difficult* to jam, not impossible. You also don’t have to jam the radar by using long range air to ground missiles, chaf and electronic warfare against the missile instead of the radar. The S-400’s massive weakness is the complex kill chain required to get that kill, stealth isn’t designed to be invisible, it’s designed to end one part of that kill chain
@@overlordgaming752 yes you can kill 8 billions people of the world with only a fork, if you could hold them. S400 designed to down stealth jets. It is in tactics which make difference, S400's options to do the job done is more than any stealth jet. Overall air defence effectiveness is more than stealth effectiveness. Destroying an ordinary target doesn't worth loosing expensive jets That's why Russia didn't invest on stealth so much, they could but they didn't.
@Calamity "C400" organizationally included in a separate kind of troops, "army air and air and missile defense" is setentrional system and "C400" not only perform the role of target detection, how many play the role of the carrier rocket. Almost the entire perimeter of Russia is blocked by over-the-horizon radars of various ranges and passive radio intelligence stations, as well as electronic warfare systems for various purposes. Therefore, the comparison of one complex with one plane is a comparison of a spherical horse in a vacuum. Yes, "s400" works at least as part of the division, and this is 20 missiles, of different classes and different targeting principles.
Fun Fact: A veteran F-16 pilot, actually had a dog Fight with the F-35 jet in a training exercise and the F-16 won. Wouldn’t really trust an F-35, to get the job done, if an F-16 can be it, in a dog fight.
it's not that easy.. 200 meters before it hits the radar, there's an automatic blocker forming a huge explosion wall... even hypersonics are hard to penetrate...
The new radars don't care if there is stealth or not. They use wavelengths that pass through the stealth coating and bounce of internal metal parts. That's why their is a rush to include composites in military jets now. Stealth is not that useful anymore, was a good military industrial complex money spinner though.
@@dankepige Actually there is and it still is significantly important. The RCS of an aircraft determines absolute detection range. Though t is not a cloak of invisibility, air superiority not only depends on stealth using the plane's shape and radar absorbing materials, it also involves usage of superior countermeasures, state of the art sensors and electronic warfare capability. Combine it all in 1 airplane, the s-400 will have a very difficult time.
there is no such thing as an invisible aircraft maybe back in the 90s but now that technology is obsolete and when dealing with R anywhere in the planet is in range..
S400 is part of access denial strategy. It is not an offensive weapon system but operates as such. Therefore the target is not primarily the strike aircraft but bases and aircraft carriers from where they are launched.
I didn't understand much but one thing I understand is that the team using the plane is on offensive and the team using ballistic missile are in defensive. So even a little destruction that happens will happens within the defensive team territory.
@@toliklisiy5868 I'm not dismissing the capabilities of the S400 platform entirely , but I'm sure it has not been put through the rigour of real combat test like the patriots in Saudi Arabia. So l would bet my safety on patriot since a lot of data has been collected for improvement. Te effect of drones and ballistic missiles from various directions and blind spots of radar coverage Until the S400 is put through a similar combat test, I would remain skeptical of its capabilities.
I thought this video was supposed to be S400 VS F35 and what would happen if they met, instead the video is "How could F35 defeat S400 if they met and what it should do to beat S400"...
@@Tuonelaan nothing is totally invincible of course our new aircraft carrier is operated by windows software and some kid landed a drone on the deck of it. Go figure eh?
@@al-azimahmed1188 and? If a kid landed a drone on it, that means the aircraft carrier was near coast, most likely in a harbor in the US. Which means all defensive systems were offline, so obiously that's possible.
not really Israel has gone against s 400 many times and still struck targets without even having to shoot at the s 400 as that would upset Russia check it out
@@kerrypriest8010 nice joke israel has used F-35 only in Gaza strip that too on defence less Palestinians. While as in Syria israel used only f-16's that too from Golan heights.then S-400 were not deployed only S-300 was deployed.
@@NapoleonGelignite That makes no sense. Syria would have the legal right to shoot the F35 down, why would they let them fly in their country and destroy the Iran backed fighters there?
How will it go? As a rough guide, in 1991 a poorly trained Serbian AA missile crew blew an F-117 "stealth" fighter out of the sky with an SA-3 Niva missile that was manufactured in 1959 and had the computing power of a tomato, the Serbs said , "Sorry, we didn't know it was invisible".
The S-400 is a game changer. The Russian military had it precisely correct they made the best Missile Defense system that solved multiple military conflicts. Pound for pound it’s less expensive than most fighters jets and is extremely effective and deadly. The S-500 is just the icing on the cake. This is a nightmare scenario
Прибавь к С-400 бук, Тор, панцырь. Ты ещё не в подгузниках маленький англоязычный дружок? Ну и конечно, если фу-35 долетит до нас, ведь эти самолёты настолько совершенны, что убивают пилота без помощи ПВО.😆
@@primi_tabletku Русня, если ты каким-то чудом сможешь обнаружить Ф-35 хотя бы со 100 км и навестись на него хотя бы с 20 км, то ты будешь удивлён, что они не собираются залетать в этот радиус для подавления вашей балалаечной перекрашенной хуйни.
S-400 itself is protected by more then a dozen medium and short range SAM systems. Flying low means A/C is now under threat from AAA and IR SAMs. The scenario you are talking about is when S-400 is acting solo which it is never
what are you idiots smoking detection range for stealth targets is barely 30km meanwhile the f35 can blow up the sam site from over a 100 km with antiradiation missiles
The Spyder MR is a good choice for stealth aircraft since it is using infrared seeker missile. It is good to use to an aircraft that can not easily detect by a radar
The S-300 system on the Russian flagship Moskva didn't seem to do so well against two subsonic anti-ship missiles. Score: Subsonic anti-ship missiles, 2: S-300 system, 0.
@@samuelweir5985 they got overwhelmed by drones and other enemies missiles and stayed in the fight instead of going back and getting rearming for more missiles
@@lw7238 no it’s an offensive ship With not much air defenses Put any NATO offensive ship in that situation And it would end the same as the Russian one
Why The Iskander Missile Has Significant Importance To Russia ruclips.net/video/N9jR5n3yqRQ/видео.html
Israel dose it all the time
Patriot forever
😂😂😂😂😂 best one in the world
Dream on, S500 can intercept fighters from 3600km range, check the new missiles that is has and they use small uranium war heads in them. The US has no functional air defenses. Do you have an idea of what S500 does? it's a game changer, range 3600km, and 350+ km altitude, in 2019 they tried against a meteorite with speed 67,000+ km and destroyed it. Russia didn't use their modern air defenses yet like s300, s400, s500, s550 and puk 3
After last April’s missile exchange, Russia supplied Iran with S400/500 air defense systems along with most advanced “radar jamming” systems. If US/Israel attacks Iran many fighter/bomber jets will be downed. Manned jet fighters are rapidly becoming obsolete in todays war theater.
This video made me want to buy some S-400 systems to protect my home.
😂... If i had some bucks i would also buy a couple of 'em for protecting my food from my mates...
It is old system. Check S500 prometheus 😉👍
😂🤣😅🤣😂😂🤣🤣
S500 is still in pre production state. Production will begin at 2022 and probably last few years. I would predict that s500 will enter service somewhere around 2026-2030. Until then s400 is capable of defending any threat. Stealth technology is absolutely overrated. Russians have radars that detect baloons for kids that otherwise is invisible to any radar. No f35 or f22 is going to be undetected. It will be imediately found intercepted either with own jets or ground to air strike and goodbye f35.
@@Stockfish1511 thanks for info.👍
Just here to watch people fight over things they know nothing about
Why dont you share your opinion then Einstein?
And some trigerred ppl
@@pavarotti9706 triggered Xd
Haha🤪 love this comment
@@pavarotti9706 we want to hear your professional opinion on the subject
My house was constantly under threat from wild F-35s, thanks to this video now I will get a S-400 to save my from those wild F-35s
I was confused between buying s-400 or F-35 , this video solved my confusion
Please let me know what site you are using, I too might need some 400s
@@deepdivyam3437 I am moving out from my apartment and interested in selling my S400 ( only slightly used, near mint condition). PM me.
S400 is in my backyard unused. Incase anybody needs it do let me know
What game is that?
@@alastair9446 real life
No war peace forever!!!!! ✌️ From Russia 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺☦️☦️☦️
But Europe and USA don't want peace they just see their interest. When they see someone is growing faster than their countries in economy they start war against that country. Now they are targeting Chinese and Russian economy. Love to Russia from Pakistan.
Same philosophy of brazil! God bless Russia 🙏 🇧🇷🇷🇺
Good Agree brother ☺️
More like Virus.
Also Russia is cool-
Watching this a few years later I think I know which one I'm gonna buy.
Which?
Yup and the Israelis agree with you
@@theunknownexplorer1944just ask the Israelis Ivan
US F-35: undetectable
RU S-400: anti-undetectable
CN quantum radar: kekekeke
🤣😂🤣
CN what-? J-unk 成都？
F35 flying bathtub? most corrupt airplane ?
RU S-400: is a best 🚀🚀🚀
@@ScubaShark--8964 Canadian National quantum radar. Canadian National is a freight rail company in Canada that has equipped their locomotives with anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic missle systems to protect against foreign forces. The quantum radar is the advanced radar system that detects airborn threats.
The US is going to sanction me if I bought S-400s for myself. That has to mean something😂
We kicked them out of the F-35 program because that was how putin was trying to get ahold of the F-35 radar data. We're not going to give putin an F-35, are you stupid? Erdogan is just Putins pathetic puppet.
We sanctioned them because Erdogan is committing genocide and getting cozy with Iran. Stop watching Russian propaganda.
@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 everything is propaganda
@@Silexabre not the dictionary.
@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 Ok i'm wrong
@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 Turkey F35 would not already given.
Russia is giving my country (India) S-400 system this year. Thanks to all Russian. 🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺🙂🙂🙂🙂
They gave s400 to China now India have to spend billions on s400.It's business.
@@horizonr639 it's s300 the Chinese got.
@@horizonr639 they gave s400 which has only 300km of range which means its s300 but India's is latest technology with 400km range
Serbia hawed same system-Serbija=Rusija=India=China💪💪💪💪destroy USA
@@aleksandarbg4183 дэ Билл
S400 isn't one of the best, IT IS THE best! Unrivalled undisputed
samuel Hara hhahaha u delusional!! The s-400 failed to detect and shoot down the f-35s that Israel used to bomb Syria!!!!
@@John-uo6jj I take it you also believe Trump won the election..
samuel Hara I take it you believe the earth is flat!!!!
@@John-uo6jj so you are..
@@samuelhara4874 what the what now? Speak English
When your speed is < 600 m/s, you can’t outmaneuver a missile coming at you at > 2000 m/s. That’s like trying to duck a bullet.
Unless your radar is able to detect the missile before it hits you
@@straightshooter8751 nope also if u detect it you can't outmaneuver it...
@@malboroman2271 There are missile detecting systems on 5th generation fighters
America is a joke of a country, all European sport Russia.
@@markopostic7066 You don't have to support Russia, but when several countries are geopolitically tied together, it's to everyone's advantage to realize that and to act accordingly.
Well the F 35 just smoked the airdefence systems in Iran..
It did not hahaha they stayed out of Iran's territory and fired from jordan
Also all missles were stopped if it wasn't for american refuelling capabilities and baby sitting to make sure they didn't enter the dangerous air space they would have shot them out of the sky and captured soldiers operators they did not want that before November 5th
As long as the world is ruled by merchants that play both sides of the chessboard we will never have peace.
That's why Turkey🇹🇷 made good decision to purchased S-400 instead of F-35
eurasiantimes.com/turkeys-s-400-systems-acquired-from-russia-are-defective-reports/
@@doc7440 hahah
Oh come on, I wonder where in Russia was written. Of course it couldn’t be written in the US, that wouldn’t mean anything... Oh wait
@@616CC Apparently for Turkey army S400 have problem with radar over 5km altitude . ( Lose 40% of range ).
" The head of the Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed the fact that the S-400 missiles acquired from Russia have not yet been put into operation. Russian sources and the media, however, report the existence of a problem identified by the Turkish army, which it has not been able to resolve for about six months."
Don't be drag into it, because it's only propoganda against Turkey from EU because most of EU countries are not happy with this deal or they start shewering from it that's why
But it also showed Turkey is a devil, it is against America but ally of Germany. Americans know very well, only germany insisted Turkey to join NATO or even EU. No other nations are that stupid about Turkey which fights with Greece
Everyone knows RUclipsrs are the authority on next gen tech....
Missile sustaining a 20 G turn ?
Meanwhile pilot : Imma head out 😂😂
Lol 20 g turns the R60 early version could do 30g this missile is prob shit
@@Nick-jl2yp don't forget its 20g at hypersonic not sub-sonic 💪
@@Nick-jl2yp You have no idea what your talking about huh. 😂
At such a G force a pilot may well wake-up a week later without even knowing where he's at. It appears that the human body can safely take up to a 9G acceleration. Anything beyond that is just too much.
@@rthelionheart yeah but more the speed, the more will be the value of G on a flyong object so jets maximum could have sharp turns at 2 to 2.5 mach and missiles take the same turn at 5 to 6 mach so that's why value of G is tripled for missiles. A pilot at 2 mach if gets 9G the missile at mach 6 foe the same turn will have to sustain 27G atleast
The spear and shield war will never end, they will try to overtake each other.
You didn't allow for Russia sinking every aircraft carrier before an F35 could take off. America has lost every war so far mainly because they attack 1000s of miles from home and against countries who are protecting their land.
We go in, wreck your country and infrastructure but you consider that a loss?
I think the Russian's deploy anti cruise missile systems on the frontline. The SA400 radar can see cross broads and know the attacking aircraft location and know where early warning aircraft location.
You have it just perfect, by targeting the support assets the s400 comes into its own
It has no chance with f35 but can isolate f35 from tankers and awacs limiting it's usefulness
Can detect on 100 km but can't lock and track for attack , max range of tracking a tipik target (f-15 16 and other 4 gen ) it's 150 km , for stealth target's track range it's more shorter than 100km
@@four-dimensionalperson Ther...target acquisition and bingo.
Sending pilots towards s400 is a wild idea.
S-300/400: good practice target for Bayraktar TB2 (Bayraktar destroyed 3 S-300 in Azerbaijan already) videos can be found on RUclips
@@MidwestDIY s-300 is not the same as the s-400. Also keep in mind the s500 is a thing.
laws of physics the realistic detection range of an s400 radar for a stealth f35 is 34 km which is too late since the F35 will have blown up the site from over 100kms away
Are you aware of the situation in Syria where Israel's F-35 stealth cannot fly easily over that airspace without actually getting an escort from a commercial plane
@@marlmyster so you believe that story pushed by Russian propaganda machine.. Isreal already demonstrated that S300 and S400 defense systems are useless.
There is no such thing as "fly low to the ground to avoid detection" anymore. After a private small plane landed on the Red Square it was tasked to create a radar that can.
Tomahawks failed in Syria with S-75/125 protecting it, connected to S-400 radars and AWACS.
Perhaps the combination of stealth capabilities & flying low?
Have you all seen Russian jets flew low in Ukraine shot down by handheld stringer missiles?
You're not talking about the tomahawks that were fired from a sub and decimated the air base are you?
Don’t forget the info u hve access to is what u are allowed to see. U don’t know what is possible. U also don’t know what is fake these days as you were not on the ground in Syria. One side says they hit one says they blocked. Truth we don’t know. We weren’t there
В 90-х самолёт приземлился не потому что его невидимом, как раз наоборот, его видели и могли сбить. А потому что была дана команда предателем Горбачевым его не сбивать, чтобы потом уволить тех генералов которые могли затеять бунт против Горбачева и смести его, что бы Горбачев продолжил свое дело по развалу Великой страны. Здрасьте, мы ВЕРНУЛИСЬ!!!😆😆😆
OK.. order one S-400 to protect me from my agressive ex.
Just chase her off
How many?
Omg have you ex ...nice but now u r single ....lol
@Umair Tallat aaaammmmm lmao 😂🤣🤣
🤣🤣
S400 And S 500 the best Ever love russian from Kongo kinshasa 🇨🇩🇨🇩🇷🇺🇷🇺
Nobody would dare to fly in Russian airspace just like they wouldn't do it in American airspace. Stealth fighters are too expensive to be lost.
Ukraine did with two helos and made it out.
@@viper1x2 Thats just propaganda my man
S-400 is often supported by EW systems, like Krasukha-4, which will further complicate things for attacking side.
There is too many variables involved, so it is impossible todetermine how things will hapen.
But one thing is for sure, nothing is invincible.
They should organise war games to test the systems out for real 😂😂😂
Never heard of proxy wars? Right now US equipped Turkey is “testing” against Russian equipped Armenia.
@@callisto537 turkey has a 400
The US has probably already done simulations.
@@toliklisiy5868 so it’s not as good as the Russian s400? Why would a buyer agree to that?
@@callisto537 в нагорном Карабахе уничтожен с300п 1980 года выпуска, который был оставлен без поддержки ЗРК среднего и малого радиуса поражения, находился постоянно в одном месте, и имел плохо обученный экипаж.
All comes down to operator... Of f-35 and s-400... Expirience, calmness, drill
Good luck human pilot on trying to beat the A.I system planted in the s400😂😂😂😂.If the pilot can dodge that then he/she can beat the A.I at chess on very hard-hardcore mode😂😂😂😂
The F-35 will be chewed up and spat out, RIP US pilots.
Also ruclips.net/video/UsY45loiqLI/видео.html
@Dennis Bakker 😑
@@dellawrence4323 until a F35 destroys a S400 platform
S-400 one of the latest defence system Entire universe so F-35 is nothing in front of s-400 😁 from Germany ❤️
Ant the s400 system is circled with pantsir or tor to intercept low altitude cruise missile or tiny drones !
Yes and the Pantsir see everything. No way F35 can reach S400. It is better with drones and overwhelming system
Tell that to atacms
@khlopzi The ones fired by Himars being destroyed with predictable regularity by the Russians in the Ukraine. The F35 is junk, that will be destroyed by Russia, as it has destroyed all the other US supplied overpriced junk in the Ukraine. Particularly given previous 'stealth' was shot down in Yugoslavia by technology predating the S300 system.
The winner S400 🇷🇺🇹🇷 I'm Indian Muslim 🇮🇳
Kuch bhi. Chup .
Well the Ukraine war definitely showed, s400s won't be able to detect F35s.
The crews will have to detect the plane with eyes instead of raders
bro f-35 is not used in ukraine war and any shooting of the russian planes who entered ukranian territory are by pattriot missile system or anti aircraft missile system's also the shooting of russian air bases are done by unmanned drone's which might be stopped by s-500 but I am not sure also s-500 has not entered mass production
F-117 was shot down by a SAM designed in 1961... S-125 Neva/Pechora.. by a general using smart tactics.. comes down to operators
Bro the F117 was obsolete.
They flew back and forth over the SAM's every night for a very long time, and none of them were able to engage them. They did not even dare turning their radars on for long each time because it painted them as target by the aircrafts.
But, yes, one battery commander was lucky enough to get a propper lock on one of the F-117's as it opened its bomb bay doors as this messed up its stealth profile while being rather close to the battery. He fired 2x missiles and managed one miss and a strafe hit, damaging it enough to make it go down.
Yes, this shows stealth is no magic. But neither is these Russian batteries. Not then, not today.
@@KjetilBalstad So wrong. We hit another one with S-125 Neva, but he mannaged to land in Bosnia. We even shot down B-2 Spirit of Missoury. He crashed in Croatia, just across the border in Spachvan woods. NATO troops are sealed whole area and took next 3 months parts and soil in sealed trucks. Croatish firefighters are describe that they saw huge black objekt crashed in fire with no vertical surfaces. Then have come NATO soldiers and blocks the whole area. After that, US have staged crash od Spirit of Cansas using one of two test B2 they wasn't operational. After thet, they just switch sign on Spirit od Cansas in Spirit of Missoury and covered everything up.
@@djokicadjokic6375 How is what I wrote wrong? Just watch the interview with the battery commander. He said they did not dare activation their radars for more than 20 sec each time because the US quickly engaged active radars.
But, the Serbs did have some skill, intelligence, and they got lucky. The US stealth bombers flew the same routes back and forth over these batteries over and over, and probably relied a little to much on the technology, making it easier for the Serbs to plan a trap. And, this particular trap actually failed two times before they managed to shoot one down.
The Serbs had discovered that using long range early warning radars set at the lowest bandwidth possible they could detect the F-117 at 25km, a very poor detection range given its 370km detection range on ordinary fighters. But, they did at least get some indications that the F-117 was on its way. They also had intelligence revealing that the Prowler electronic warfare birds ordinarily supporting the F-117 were grounded, and that the F-117s were going to fly regardless. This, paired with the US fighter’s tendency to fly the same routes over and over, enabled the Serbs to relocate their SAM's to an expected flight path and ready their systems for the next sortie.
However, with the early warning radar they could just about detect that there was something in the air, but nothing more. To shoot it down they need a weapons grade track. For this they had to use the S-125 radar systems. The target acquisition C-band radar that usually detected aircraft out to about 240km could not see the F-117 at all, so they were left with the fire control radar that usually was used to guide the missiles to their target. They already had this radar pointed exactly at the expected patch of the F-117 when they got the notice from the early warning systems that the F-117 was on its way. And they activated this exactly at the right time to optimize any chance of a lock. But this time, just as the two previous attempts, they could not get a lock at all.
However, now the lucky part comes into play. Because they knew the Prowlers were grounded, they decided that they could probably activate the radar once more, without risking being engaged themselves. Just as they activated the radar the second time, the F-117 was preparing to drop its ordinance, and his weapon bays were open exposing its easily detectable bomb bay interior.
At this point the F-117 was only 8km away, and they fired at least two missiles at the aircraft. Another thing to point out is the fact that the F-117 has no actual radar or even missile warning systems activated, as the design required it being free of the necessary external components for such a system. So, the pilot had no warning systems cueing him that missiles had been fired his way, and only eventually saw the missiles heading straight at him.
Of the two missiles fired the first actually buffeted the F-117 without detonating, most likely because its proximity trigger was unable to detect the aircraft. The second missile missed, but the proximity trigger did detect and detonate the missile causing fragment and blast damage crippling the aircraft ability to maneuver, forcing the pilot to eject.
This is the fully disclosed and confirmed series of events leading up to the successful downing of a single F-117. There is no indications or proof what so ever that an B-2 was actually shot down.
And, given the kill chain described above, the operational altitude of the B-2, the difference in operational procedures, the B-2’s much more capable stealth surfaces also deflecting lower band radar emissions, I find it highly unlikely that such an attack was even attempted.
@@KjetilBalstad This part is right. Other is wrong. But this 20 sec. were enought to shot them down.
Most underrated channel...... doing good job... love from India...🙏
The strategy to beat the s400 system is to remotely fly expendable throw-away air crafts into enemy territory. When fired upon this would reveal the location of the s400 system as well as the launch vehicles. Fly as many throw away aircrafts as it takes to deplete the enemies missile inventory.
That’s not exactly cost effective
WONT WORK, RUSSIAN JAMM THE AIR, USS DONALD COOK BLACK SEA EXAMPLE GREAT RUclips VIDEO.
@@debbies3763 Fabricated story. A tiny aircraft jamming a high powered warship that also has jamming technology? Really? The aircraft was detected miles in advance.
@@sosomelodies659 well i wasnt there, however iwas there when that tiny space capsel landed on the moon, technology has come along way since then.
@@edwinyax1850 BS. The Israelis used swarms in the Bekaa Valley to get Russian SAMs to light up so they could promptly annihilate them. Study EW and get back to us.
F35 F22 both are just waste of money. S400 is a smart move.
they are fighter jets versus Pakistanis, China, Russia, Iran, Syria fighterjets
What will happen? RIP F-35 ⚰️
F-35 is already defunct.
might have to do an update on the failure of the s400, more particularly the operators of this system
They have S 500 right now....I think they might have S 1000 kept in secret.
And The s700 is at least under developpement
Still in development
No s500 is still under development 😂
The s500 is still under development hell and is facing a lot of problems
It's kinda like the f-35 of air defense systems, but without the budged of the US military that can just throw money at the problem until it goes away
S 1000🤣😅😆
You guys got
good channel
Glad I found this channel gonna enjoy this binge lol
This is a very honest, well informed and real analysis I have seen so far.
The new anti radiation missile that the Northrop Grumman's Orbital ATK is developing is a must have in a F-35's inventory. This new missile called AARM-ER has a classified range and speed, but given that the current AARM has a range of over 150km and speed of over Mach 2, it's safe to say that the new missile will have the range outside the envelope non stealthy jets can be targeted, meaning over 300 km, and speeds of Mach 3 and above. These missiles for now will be loaded on Growlers which will be an incredibly deadly platform when they receive the NGJ or Next generation jammer pods.
In the end, nobody knows how any of the advertised systems would work until they're combat tested. That's why we can say with certainty that Tomahawks work, JDAMS, Abrams, Javelin, etc... On the other hand stealth vs counter stealth technology was never tested against a near peer adversary. Their weapons manufacturers claim they can detect and track US stealth jets. Our defense companies and weapons designers claim that the Raptors and F-35s were specifically designed to counter advanced SAM systems. We can all bitch and moan in the comment sections of various internet sights, but any normal person would hope that we never get to a point where these highly advanced weapons systems go head to head.. In the end, if one side finds itself in a desperate situation where their conventional forces are beaten and the danger of unconditional surrender approaches, then nuclear weapons will fly and all bets are off. Then it won't matter if you have 50 or 200 B-21 Raider bombers or wheather you have S-400 or S-700 super duper system that can detect a fly on the other side of the Earth. Hundreds of millions will die within 20 minutes while the ones who survive will wish they've died instantly....
Hi dude please read the US Posydone doctrine. There will be a war without nuclear ICBM strikes wheather cruise missiles.. dozen of cruise missiles
@@nurjakhonradjabov2180 not against a power like Russia or China!! Any war btw the US and one of them will inevitably imply a use of nuclear weapons
The has lowered the standards on the F35 to the point that the F16 is king. A general stated the F35 has 209 ways to kill a pilot, they never have solved the problem with the oxygen system at high altitudes causing the pilot to pass out. Russia routinely practice’s at 40 thousand feet and they have hypersonic missiles
just to remind you, a "super duper" S-500 recently shot down a satellite. so i wouldn't call them "super duper" as they have a real potential to take down some "super duper" American satellites, and I don't mean just the stupid a** Starlink units by Elon Musk.
@@Piotrus31492 all shit aside. Let's fucking try it ... USA ain't scared of a all bullshit talk country Russia blah blah blah who got beat by talibans with slippers and stones🤣🤣🤣 bring it!!!! Fuck!!! Russia China and bullshit North Korea.. ask Trump!!! When the wolf comes growling at the door you best be ready! with all that talk! the eagles will come raining on you and putin will be just another Sadam running for his life
I use to work at s400 production plant i can assure you that 1 quart of fabuloso when mopping the floor makes invasive odors virtually undetectable using a 200mm mop handle
One simple Solution ..don't go to the war..stay your home..and make your defense system stronger and stronger
Since my both parents earned pensions doing this technology I will tell you firstly that current STEALTH technology has no chance against S-400 system, up to one percent, and would have a REALLY tough time against S-300 system, up to eight percent, I will take my time and take a critical look at your video.
Uhh your on drugs
Have you heard about the f-36😂🤦♂️
Is S-400 available in Amazon application for sell ?
Very nice informative video thank you :)
Yeah nice but it brings nice destruction too
Haha, what ever the result F35 attacking S400 directly, one thing for sure..the.airport base where these F35 launched/departed wont be there for them to land when/if they get back..
This video is amazing.... Great explanation about the missile..
well
you would know that if you had sold those F35 to Turkey
LoL.
Even iran can shoot down stealth drones that have a lower radar signature than an aircraft.
Which Stealth drone was SHOT DOWN by Iran ???🤣🤣🤣🤣
RQ-170 was not shot down.
And RQ-4 is not stealthy
s 400 never stands alone there separation defense system that cover it Pantsir-S1 , tor m2, buk
yes are various layers.
wait what? where's the f-35 stealth capabilities? if it has to attack an s-400 flying low and then pull up to launch with gliding bombs with the risk of also being detected and get shot down by manpads missiles.
S400 has high power L band now. F35 would be detected early and either run into BVR missiles or be destroyed.
@@grndzro777 that doesnt really mean much, the thing about stealth is not to be invisible but to be hard to detect and to track, like yeah there are certain radars that can detect an f-35 but the hard part is not to detect it but to get it's specific location and then be able to get a target lock and guide the misile to it and destroy it, all of that is far harder than it looks
Like maybe the SAM site can indeed detect the f-35, but if it can only detect it at 50 kilómeters which is less than the f-35s weapons range them there is a high posibility that by the time the aircraft is detected it has already completed it's mission, also maybe you can detect it but it's radar signature is soo tiny that it's really dificult to get a target lock on it, you only know "something is there in that general direction, idk what it is but it's there" without a weapons lock detection is useless because you can't engage the target, and maybe you launch a misiles but the misile radar fails to detect the f-35, or you manage to get a hit but it was a decoy, of the active protection systems of the f-35 fuck with the radar systems of the misile or the misile site and it fails to hit
There are a lot of variables that just having a more powerful or better radar will not fix
Also don't forget that capabilities are usually exagerated for propaganda reasons, the s400 has never proved itself against a stealth fighter for a reason, if it where to actually shot it down the reputation of stealth fighters as "invincible" aces of the sky would disapear but if the s400 where to fail to pick it's target and be destroyed then the reputation of it as the "stealth killer" air defense system would also disapear, and better not to test any of those theories
@@carso1500 That's the problem. F117/B2/F22/F35 are all completely visible to L band.
It's how that 60's era system shot down an F117. They tuned the radar frequency.
By it's nature L band isn't very accurate so several are needed to get an accurate lock. This means that the system is specifically designed to be networked, and use all angles. Protivnik has a low frequency range of 400 miles. F35 would probably be detected around 300 miles, and the new SU57 has L band integrated in the wings.
Russia might have even better range than that with the newer systems.
All they need is a semi accurate confirmation and they can send out the Vympel R-37M's
On top of that Russia is ahead in EW systems. They disabled the Donald Cook with two large EW pods in 2014, and have ground based systems that can knock out low orbit satellites. Even if we fire a missile if the site is protected by Krasukha EW it won't reach the target. And that was in 2014. Russia has advanced a lot since then.
And on top of ALL of that China is sharing it's Divine Eagle 2 drone tech with Russia. Those can detect stealth at long ranges.
Don't take anything here as confrontational. I am really enjoying the conversation. You make a lot of really good points.
@@grndzro777 thats not at all how the f117 was shot down, another guy wrote a full disclosure on how that happened and to be sincere i don't really want to rewrite it all
But i can give a short resume
The shot down of the f117 was basically pure luck and Bad strategy based on the united states, the soviet systems used where completly uncapable of tracking the stealth plane, they could kind of know that it was there but only at like at a 5 km range and getting a lockdown was imposible, the shot down was a combinations of factors like the airplane flying alone that day because it's escorts where grounded, that it was flying through the same path so they where prepared and in the área, and that just when they activated the radar the f117 had just opened up their bomb bay which reduces it's stealth capabilities, they threw two missiles both failed to get a lock down but one of them was lucky enough to just barely hit the plane and cause enough damage to force the pilot to eject
Regardless to say the f117 flew for other 10 years going against similar systems and said incident was never repeated once on it's whole history, with the combination of factors that was basically a golden shot
So no L band can't detect a stealth plane any more than any other radar, it's not some magic stealth killer, it requieres a lot of luck to pull something like that
@@carso1500
that's not true, because the Serbs hit at least two of the f117-s, probably more. The other one was badly damaged and decommissioned right after the mission. USA has also acknowledged that but only 20 years after the event.
C 400 will be covered at the bottom with a Shell C, and at the middle level of the Beech M1 and C 300. C 400 will definitely not stand alone, like a forgotten shovel in the field.)
S-400: I can destroy F-35 jet
S-700: see that right there that my grand kid
Lmao this the one
Grandpa*
@@adityajadhav3045 yes sorry
Weird 😶
Grandpa. My friend and s300 is great grandpa 😁
Everyone is talking about how to beat S400 with F35. Me let's do ground attack 😂😂😂
Please, do!
*S400 vs F35:*
*TB2 WINS.*
😎
Bayraktar tb 2 drone turkish :))
Tb 2 is not a pure Turkish made
@@theidiotskiller6589 F-35 too.
@@Eye.Of.Sauron Neva S-125 wins 😂
I'm not reassured by this video, in fact, the opposite. The disparity between the capabilities in delivery vehicles and anti-missile defense between the US and Russia has become disturbingly great at this point.
Descent video, short, concise pretty much covers most of the major points. However, there is a difference between detecting the F35 and engaging it with a high quality track. F35 would probably launch it's weapons well out of their trackable range. It would ultimately be a matter of how many incoming missiles and bombs S400 could intercept, and who runs out of ammo first. Lastly, something to consider that makes things highly unquantifiable in this kind of scenario is that being able to datalink targeting information between nodes on both sides of the fight. That being possible could and will spawn some interesting tactics on both sides of the fight.
Yep. Each squad of 3-5 F35s will have an accompanying 3-5 Boeing drones flying with them. Meaning possibly 25 aircraft will be coming for these s400 installations. All it takes is one of these aircraft to hit the s400. Once that happens the F15, F16 and F18 all can come in and destroy any other infrastructure.
The point of stealth has always been to destroy radar and anti aircraft infrastructure. Out 4th generation fighters are still superior in every way to stealth planes. They simply are too easy to detect and shoot down. However once the stealth destroys the ability to detect and shoot down aircraft then the 4th generation fighters can rain down hell upon the enemy.
@@stevederp9801 Блажен кто верует. Ибо нехуй!
@@stevederp9801 этот принцип сработает со страной со слабой системой ПВО, в случае с Россией такое не прокатит.
@@stevederp9801 What about the S300 though? Wont even they be able to counter F15 and F16s to some extent?
@@bjornborg4849 Not to some extent but effectively.
Deadly SAM🔥🔥🔥🔥👍👍👍
US never wants Russia China India collaborate and unite in peace because they know Nato can't stand a chance infront Russia China India combined 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Russia and China and India and China have border disputes. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
India is a strategic Military partner with the U.S to counter Chinese expansion
India is a Military Allie to the U.S.
There is one critical flaw in this video's military situation. The situation is missing the fact that when Russians use missiles, they use multiple missiles at the same time similar to how Russian Battlecruiser Peter the Great uses its missiles. It will be just as difficult for multiple F35s to evade incoming S500 missiles as it would be difficult for Russians to hit the actual F35s rather than decoys and drones. F35 squadron's dilemma will be whether S500 batteries that just shot bunch of missiles are priority targets or the incoming supersonic and hypersonic missiles are higher priority. S500 batteries or incoming supersonic and hypersonic missiles. That decision must be made within minutes since hypersonic will reach decoys, drones and F35s in 2 to 3 minutes which is not enough time for F35 pilots brains to process. It can be overwhelming. Even if S500 batteries are hit and destroyed, here come the supersonic and especially hypersonic missiles. Not just a few but dozens of them. It will be suicidal for both Russian S500 battalion and F35 squadron.
400Save your 35Don't rejoice USA Europe
Olvidaron el tor m2 y el pansir ambos acompañan el s-400 para detener posibles misiles con dirección al s-400.
The F-35 planes cannot confront the S-400 except in the case of wireless communication between them and the leadership and the rest of the supporting planes, but what will happen if the planes lose contact with each other?? Here, electronic warfare and jamming devices will play a big role, the Russians are not underestimated in this field
Well, jamming won't work because S400 has a feature called frequency jumping in split of the second and can expose aircraft or any jamming device defenceless.
For now there's no way to evade the S400
Massively incorrect, just ask Israel. While yes it’s *difficult* to jam, not impossible. You also don’t have to jam the radar by using long range air to ground missiles, chaf and electronic warfare against the missile instead of the radar.
The S-400’s massive weakness is the complex kill chain required to get that kill, stealth isn’t designed to be invisible, it’s designed to end one part of that kill chain
@@overlordgaming752 yes you can kill 8 billions people of the world with only a fork, if you could hold them. S400 designed to down stealth jets. It is in tactics which make difference, S400's options to do the job done is more than any stealth jet. Overall air defence effectiveness is more than stealth effectiveness.
Destroying an ordinary target doesn't worth loosing expensive jets
That's why Russia didn't invest on stealth so much, they could but they didn't.
The tactic as shown on video is to destroy it, not to evade it, bc as you said it is not evasible, S400 can detect even cockroaches running around
@@josephwallis8965 there’s a ton of ways to defeat it. The overarching theme is breaking a link in the long kill chaim
What about S500, S600,S700?
By the way s400 has 6 radar and range is 400km,before you know s400 will attack you.
Can F35 attack from 400km?
@Calamity "C400" organizationally included in a separate kind of troops, "army air and air and missile defense" is setentrional system and "C400" not only perform the role of target detection, how many play the role of the carrier rocket. Almost the entire perimeter of Russia is blocked by over-the-horizon radars of various ranges and passive radio intelligence stations, as well as electronic warfare systems for various purposes. Therefore, the comparison of one complex with one plane is a comparison of a spherical horse in a vacuum. Yes, "s400" works at least as part of the division, and this is 20 missiles, of different classes and different targeting principles.
They can attack and escape easily
@Calamity plz go and solve your f35 engine problem then try to attack....
@@mobusherkayani5574 i like it denial
Fun Fact: A veteran F-16 pilot, actually had a dog Fight with the F-35 jet in a training exercise and the F-16 won. Wouldn’t really trust an F-35, to get the job done, if an F-16 can be it, in a dog fight.
The F-35 is an attack aircraft. Should not have the designation of “F”….
And F-16 taken down by Mig-21
In a "training exercise" with clear rules of engagement. Yeah, that's useless as shit in the real world.
Turkish drones vs S400s which weapon will win?Turkish drones already defeated the S300.
40 year old s300, yes.
Turkey has already purchased the s_400
🤣
S400 is a beast.
If I buy it, will it help me with the pigeons who keeps dropping poop on my car? 🤔
it's not that easy.. 200 meters before it hits the radar, there's an automatic blocker forming a huge explosion wall... even hypersonics are hard to penetrate...
You mean the Arena System right?
@@robinx961 nope gazecicE..... tor m2 .... kaztan... 3 layer always
The Serbs shot down the F117, invisible, with Russian systems from the 1960s. With the S400, I would make a bunch of garbage out of F35 and F22
U know how effective this s400 ,
When every country purchasing it will get sanction
It's not " effective"
you see it cost trillions to develop f35 we don't want to give russia experience in fighting it.
The s400 will do just that.
@@cedriceric9730 At least you talked the truth.
Even if these beautiful F-35 wrappers destroy something, they will definitely not return to their base alive.
This is all about notion explain nobody still saw s 400 shot down f35
@@Mother-Russia-Z American never said what u hve said s400 can't shot down f35 I give u guarantees
I think the Narrator forgot that the F-35 is a stealth aircraft. He's describing losses like they would use F-16s.
The new radars don't care if there is stealth or not. They use wavelengths that pass through the stealth coating and bounce of internal metal parts. That's why their is a rush to include composites in military jets now. Stealth is not that useful anymore, was a good military industrial complex money spinner though.
@@dankepige Actually there is and it still is significantly important. The RCS of an aircraft determines absolute detection range. Though t is not a cloak of invisibility, air superiority not only depends on stealth using the plane's shape and radar absorbing materials, it also involves usage of superior countermeasures, state of the art sensors and electronic warfare capability. Combine it all in 1 airplane, the s-400 will have a very difficult time.
there is no such thing as an invisible aircraft maybe back in the 90s but now that technology is obsolete and when dealing with R anywhere in the planet is in range..
Do ans what is stealth? Minimizing the shape on radar? Imagine what AI can do. Infact ML
@@dankepige xDDDDD
S400 is part of access denial strategy. It is not an offensive weapon system but operates as such. Therefore the target is not primarily the strike aircraft but bases and aircraft carriers from where they are launched.
Ummm.. No. You have no understanding how this system is used at all... SMH
I didn't understand much but one thing I understand is that the team using the plane is on offensive and the team using ballistic missile are in defensive. So even a little destruction that happens will happens within the defensive team territory.
F-35 cant deal with S-400. F-22 maybe. Turkia's S-400 test result.
How do you know F35 can't detect S400?
There are cutting edge sensors and receivers onboard F35s
@@toliklisiy5868 same logic applies to your argument. Are you sure the S400 platform will not disappoint you in real combat
@@toliklisiy5868 and don't be naive. Your hate for the west shouldn't cloud your objectivity
@@toliklisiy5868 I'm not dismissing the capabilities of the S400 platform entirely , but I'm sure it has not been put through the rigour of real combat test like the patriots in Saudi Arabia. So l would bet my safety on patriot since a lot of data has been collected for improvement. Te effect of drones and ballistic missiles from various directions and blind spots of radar coverage
Until the S400 is put through a similar combat test, I would remain skeptical of its capabilities.
@@toliklisiy5868 your choice of words simply indicate your bias
I thought this video was supposed to be S400 VS F35 and what would happen if they met, instead the video is "How could F35 defeat S400 if they met and what it should do to beat S400"...
Lol the s400 can't even keep bayrakter drones from bombing Russian troops.
theyre not used for it.
F-35 does have radar jamming and electronic capabilities
WHY DONT YOU LAND IT IN RUSSIA
No way anything gets past the s-400.
Birds maybe
Nothing gets past, plenty of tings can destroy it though
@@Tuonelaan nothing is totally invincible of course our new aircraft carrier is operated by windows software and some kid landed a drone on the deck of it. Go figure eh?
@@al-azimahmed1188 and? If a kid landed a drone on it, that means the aircraft carrier was near coast, most likely in a harbor in the US. Which means all defensive systems were offline, so obiously that's possible.
In India it added 1 or 2 years
Thanks for the great content!
Dont forget to sub
Love to see s-400 in real fight with F-35's.
Usa is so afraid to get near s400 😎
not really Israel has gone against s 400 many times and still struck targets without even having to shoot at the s 400 as that would upset Russia check it out
@@kerrypriest8010 nice joke israel has used F-35 only in Gaza strip that too on defence less Palestinians. While as in Syria israel used only f-16's that too from Golan heights.then S-400 were not deployed only S-300 was deployed.
@@cold_fussion6317 nah bro ur wrong they use f35 mostly over syria
@@galadato7425 who uses F-35 in Syria???
Israeli f-35 flew right by them and killed their targets and flew home - explain it to us - how dat?
Like other Russian military equipment. Great on the paper. Socks when put in to the real test in real conflict.
Thanks for sharing us
The F35 has already flown by S400s in Syria and S300s in Iran.
They wanted the S400 to light up the planes - they had lots of sensor drones ready to harvest signal data. The Russians didn’t play ball.
@@NapoleonGelignite That makes no sense. Syria would have the legal right to shoot the F35 down, why would they let them fly in their country and destroy the Iran backed fighters there?
@@ThatCarGuy because the Israeli war planes never enter Syrian airspace for air strikes.they mostly strike at standoff ranges.
@@iamAK47 Yup, OP is full of shit.
How will it go? As a rough guide, in 1991 a poorly trained Serbian AA missile crew blew an F-117 "stealth" fighter out of the sky with an SA-3 Niva missile that was manufactured in 1959 and had the computing power of a tomato, the Serbs said , "Sorry, we didn't know it was invisible".
🤣
It was luck
The S-400 is a game changer. The Russian military had it precisely correct they made the best Missile Defense system that solved multiple military conflicts. Pound for pound it’s less expensive than most fighters jets and is extremely effective and deadly. The S-500 is just the icing on the cake. This is a nightmare scenario
Here is what I can tell you. The F-35 is not invisible. It’s just incredibly hard to track and nearly impossible to shoot down. Even for the S-400.
@Kush Kush look in the comments. They have lol.
@Kush Kush cool. My statements still stand. F-35 is decades ahead of the game. Wait until you see the new Stealth fighter.
Тебе об этом в рекламном ролике рассказали?
@@sweettrav20 the SU 75?
Всё верно. Даже и не замышляйте....
oooo sorry Ivan
Just brilliant 😎👍🔥🔥🔥🔥
Think Turkey have both now S400 and Bayraktar Drone 😱
What's going on,
Russia💪🇷🇺 VS💪🇺🇲US-VS - Othomans 💪🇹🇷
The F35 isn't alone, big part of it's value is it's not restricted to the weapons it carries itself.
The S-400 is not alone either. There will be a lot of them!
Прибавь к С-400 бук, Тор, панцырь. Ты ещё не в подгузниках маленький англоязычный дружок? Ну и конечно, если фу-35 долетит до нас, ведь эти самолёты настолько совершенны, что убивают пилота без помощи ПВО.😆
@@primi_tabletku Русня, если ты каким-то чудом сможешь обнаружить Ф-35 хотя бы со 100 км и навестись на него хотя бы с 20 км, то ты будешь удивлён, что они не собираются залетать в этот радиус для подавления вашей балалаечной перекрашенной хуйни.
Russia has already developed S-550, now they can hit anyone in the world.
S-400 itself is protected by more then a dozen medium and short range SAM systems. Flying low means A/C is now under threat from AAA and IR SAMs. The scenario you are talking about is when S-400 is acting solo which it is never
Only unpredictable system is indian
@@bokulahmmed756 is that a brain fart?
@@hp2084 yess
@@bokulahmmed756 but what did you try to say?
Imagine all that just for one S 400. So that already tells you how advance the S 400 is.
what are you idiots smoking detection range for stealth targets is barely 30km meanwhile the f35 can blow up the sam site from over a 100 km with antiradiation missiles
@@eduwino151 Yeah. If you hate the Russian weapons say that. Every country knows Russia makes the best SAMs and missiles.
@@theduke1654 tell that the to the Russian airdefence sites blown up by Ukranian drones, They are only the best in propaganda
@@theduke1654 Russian troops fled and abandoned a modern pantsir s1 that will end up in American hands giving them new ways to jam them
@@eduwino151 ты лучше расскажи сколько американцев сбежало из авганистана бросив свое оружие
The Spyder MR is a good choice for stealth aircraft since it is using infrared seeker missile. It is good to use to an aircraft that can not easily detect by a radar
Won't work in cloudy climate. Only good for Israel and ME.
So Erdogan chose right
Only time will tell. I hope we never find out 🙏
The S-300 system on the Russian flagship Moskva didn't seem to do so well against two subsonic anti-ship missiles.
Score: Subsonic anti-ship missiles, 2: S-300 system, 0.
That’s because those missiles were used against TB2 drones
@@mbtenjoyer9487 Guess that the ship's crew should have remembered to save some missiles to use against any anti-ship missiles that showed up.
@@samuelweir5985 they got overwhelmed by drones and other enemies missiles and stayed in the fight instead of going back and getting rearming for more missiles
@@mbtenjoyer9487 In other words they don't work well and it's easy to defeat.
@@lw7238 no it’s an offensive ship
With not much air defenses
Put any NATO offensive ship in that situation
And it would end the same as the Russian one
Imagine when you are flying low to avoid detection but then shot down by a MANPAD.