Legacy of the Huns: Germanic and Turkic Kingdoms in Europe
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
- In the aftermath of the Hunnic invasions, the geopolitical situation in Europe changed drastically. Between 370 and 453, the year of Attila's death, many Germanic and even Iranic tribes such as the Visigoths, Gepids and Alans migrated into Roman lands. The Vandals conquered Carthage and Roman Africa in 439, while Illyria became Ostrogothic territory and Odoaker of the Turkilingi tribe took over Italy in 476. The Western Roman Empire was thus crumbling under external pressure. But the Hunnic Empire had also collapsed after the death of Attila, its last great king. The events further east, however, are often overlooked in contemporary history books. Unjustly so. Because the Huns did not suddenly "disappear".
On the contrary, the people who had migrated to Europe stayed, bringing with them their cultures from Central Asia. The result was the creation of several new state-like entities, from the Hungarian plains to the Danube-Caspian region. Among them was the Onogur Federation. Composed of remnants of the Hunnic Empire as well as new migrants from Asia, the Onogur confederation laid the foundations for a Turkic presence in Eastern Europe, as well as being the predecessors of the Bulgars and perhaps even the Magyars, the ancestors of today's Hungarians and Bulgarians.
Finally, the Onogur federation served as a transition between the Hunnic era and the Göktürk era that would begin a century after Attila's death, as the Onogur presence in Ukraine would also enable a Göktürk presence on the Black Sea coast against Byzantium. It is time to unravel their story once and for all. We will delve deeper into the aftermath of the Hunnic invasions in both Western and Eastern Europe, revealing the legacy of the Huns long after the death of Attila.
Chapters:
00:00-02:10 Introduction: Ending Empires, Starting Kingdoms
02:11-07:53 Dissolution of the Hunnic Empire
07:54-15:13 Germanic Kingdoms
15:14-22:35 Turkic States
22:36-26:12 Dismantling the "Barbarian" Narrative
WEBSITE: bit.ly/KhansDen
GÖKTÜRK MOVIE 01: bit.ly/GokturkMovie1
GÖKTÜRK MOVIE 02: bit.ly/GokturkMovie2
GÖKTÜRK MOVIE 03: bit.ly/GokturkMovie3
PATREON: bit.ly/3BR6M3T
PODCAST: bit.ly/KhansDenPodcast
BOOK 1: amzn.to/3fwqmKR
BOOK 2: [Coming Soon]
It's out... phew. FINALLY. With this video, we have had Hunnic documentaries with 100 minutes total runtime published within two months. That was quite a lot of work, but judging from the numbers, I suppose it was worth it.
So thanks for watching! And keep an eye out for the next video - because we are not done yet with the Huns. There is one region that we have not really covered, but had mentioned before, and which was ruled by Hunnic entities for nearly 300 years. Can you guess which region it is?
NORTH CAUCASIA of Avars, Balkars! Correct?
20:41 Doesn't Saragurs correspond to Yellow tribes ?
Hephtalites
Central asia and Iranic regions ruled by the white huns i suppose
Usually it would, @@nenenindonu. However, "sara" also meant "white", akin to "ak" meaning white later on in Middle Turkic. As the Saragurs were situated on the western edge of the Eurasian Steppe Periphery, and as the West was associated with White, I'd assume "White Tribes" to be the logical translation.
Great video again. Ernak and Irnik names still used in Hungary, name days on March 25th and Ellak on July 8th.
Azért jó ha tudod... lrnik - nem azonos Csabával - hanem, ezek , testvérek ..... !
:)
In my opinion, the name Dengizik derives from Tengiz-teg "Sea-like". As in the names of the sons of Çengiz Khan (Çengiz also most likely comes from Tengiz by the way), the Turkic suffix -teg, -dek, -tey means "like" or "as":
-Çaga-tey = Juvenile-like / Youthful
- Ögä-tey = Glory-like / Famous
But this has a catch. If the name is Deŋizteg, than it can't be Oghuric, because of the missing rhotacism. The oghuric variant would be something like Dengirtek. Sounds similar. Maybe the author of the source did a little mistake or couldn't dfferenciate the turkic sounds.
Or the name is Dengirçik (little Sea) as Männhen-Helfen suggestet.
Could it be that some Huns spoke Oghuric and some spoke common turkic. Quite possible. Or the switch from rhotacism to zetacism wasn't fully completed then? At least in some tribes of the European Huns? Everything is possible.
But every etimological explanation is easily recognizable as turkic, as in the names of Atillas other sons:
Ellac from ilek / elig (ruler / king) - most likely a title
Ernak from Erkek / Erenkäk / Erklig or some variant of it with the meanings of manliness / mightyful / Power
Even today there are plentiful turkic names with "er" man/soldier. (Erhan, Erkan, Ertuğrul, Taner etc.)
There are some turkic dialects, where erŋek means finger or thumb.
Greetings
Deniz
Always waiting with anticipation for your videos! Thank you for your hard work everytime.❤
Brilliant series. After having watched Ertugrul and other Turkish series I have become fascinated to to know Turkic culture. The references to Tengrism are also very interestng. Do you know if Turkic peoples used any kind of sacred plants in their magical practices? Anamita Muscaria perhaps? Cannabis?
Cannabis remnants were found inside the urns used for drinking wine, in the burials of Scythian sites.
I’m watching this after Ertugrul, too
Seljuks brought cannabis to Anatolia & later spread to Europe.
yep still using some drugs to get the talk to dead persons but idk which plants are they using can be a opium
Super video thanks for your hard work And the comments to the video are high quality adding additional information Thanks to all of you
Greatt. Thanks from brazil and for subs.
Very interesting and informative 👍
You added a few extra pieces - I see more of the Big Picture - every time you Post. Thank you!
very well done
I'm not sure I found this channel but I love it
In a manuscript of Otto of Freising's History of Two Cities an editor, seemingly from the thirteenth century, added a marginal note to a passage describing the conversion of a king of the Huns at the time of the Emperor Justinian. This note commented that the Turks' were formerly known as 'Huns' and that Western Huns are now called Hungarians and Avars. This comment, whilst obscure and late, demonstrates that this author at least understood that a link existed between the Turks and Hungarians. 52 There is an earlier source that makes a similar point. This is the Chronicle of Montecassino, which in an account of the First Crusade's crossing of Asia Minor, refers to the Seljuk Turkish ruler, Qilij Arslan of Nicaea, as the 'king of Huns, who now we call Turks'. 53
Morton, N., John, S. (2016). Crusading and Warfare in the Middle Ages: Realities and Representations. Essays in Honour of John France. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 59.
Hey bro.. I'm interested to know what nationality and/or ethnicity you are? I must say you do not miss a beat. I'm an very deep history enthusiast and I've been heavily into Turkic histories lately and geez man.. you have literally covered every single Turkic video on youtube.. I am truly amazed man I must say. It's been yrs now I've noticed your comments. I don't agree with all your comments though I believe you are quite educated on these matters and I agree on a lot of things..Good for you bro. Anyway all the best ✌☝️
@democratwaifu What do you mean youtube commentary?.. I'm talking about @Papazaltirimam. His dedication to commenting on every single Turkic history doco is fascinating. I mean some would say he says way too much though his passion is unmatched
@democratwaifu I don't see any full time youtube commentary from him.. Dunno what you're looking at
It was an informative and historical interesting video....allot thanks for sharing...
When I was in 8th grade I did a history day presentation on the huns. I didn't win anything lol but I learned a lot about the huns because those guys were awesome 💯
Modern genetic studies of bone material from Bulgarian burials from the period of the early Middle Ages clearly shows that the ethnic appearance of the discovered bodies belongs to the Indo-European group. Archaeologically, the Proto-Bulgarians belong to the Sarmato-Alan cultures.
The Proto-Bulgarians as inhabitants of the lands north of the Caucasus in the 2nd century are mentioned by the Armenian historian Movses Khorenatsi. In his History of Armenia, written in the 80's of the 5th century AD, he speaks about two migrations of Proto-Bulgarians from Caucasus to Armenia. Proto-Bulgarians lived amongst Sarmato-Alan and Slavic tribes for centuries before migrating to the Balkans. However, Turkic elements could also be found due to the influence of the Avars (mostly) and the Göktürks.
Most of the names of the rulers and aristocrats of the First Bulgarian Empire are of Iranian origin.
Names such as Sinnion, Zabergan, Kubrat/Xovrat, Bezmer/Bozmihr, Asparukh, Tervel, Kormes, Sevar, Kardam, Krum, Omurtag/Murtag, Negavon, Okorsis/Korsis, Malamir, Boris, Rasate, etc., are proven to be (Indo)Iranian and generally Indo-European in origin (and etymology) and does not have Turkic analogues. The last pagan ruler of Bulgaria was literally called Persian/Presian.
When the Abbasid Arab historians invaded the kingdom of the Volga Bulgars, he saw that they resembled the Slavic people, but they had strange death rituals, such as when a leader among them died, they built a ship and put all the belongings of this leader and his slaves in it, and they burned the ship in the river. This and the same customs as the Vikings.
Bulgar eğitim sistemi özellikle tarih ve edebiyatı Türk düşmanlığı üzerine kurulu olduğu için (osmanlı döneminden dolayı) Bulgarların Hunlar ve Türkler ile kuzen olduklarını şidettle redetmelerini anlayabiliyorum. Ortalama bir Türke "biz Türkler ve Bulgarlar akrabayız,tarihi gerçek bu" desen " nekadar güzel" der fazla da kafaya takmaz. Ama Bulgarlar bunu hazmedemiyor ve fazla tepki gösteriyor.
it'd be great to have an episode detailing down on Göktürk/tengri faith system and it's ethical as well as moral implementations.
Great work m8, it's already amazing to have the depth of content especially integrated with such visuals; amazing use of AI.
Keep 'em coming!
Thank you very much! I did just that in the newest video „Celestial Turks“. You might want to check that one out. Cheers.
Such great content keep it up.
Fascinating work, text, narration and illustration. You're brilliant. I hope a dub in Russian will follow the English one as before, for you know, some children of these great people think and speak in Russian nowadays
If you mentioned the countries of former usssr,no worries most of us can speak in english as well as in russian nowadays
We are trilingual , and no ,we do not forget our languages, it’s a stereotype, most of the time we just type with cyrrilic letters on our turkic languages
@@Jade-ju1qs I wish it was true what you say, but I have been to post ussr countries and all I saw was people laughing at their own words being uttered, last names ending in Slavic suffixes etc. I do know there are some who prefer to speak in their native ones at least at home though, thanks
@@yagmuralksal4762 yes it was common issue especially among urban residents( rural people never have it)in our countries,unfortunately the russification left mark , but now the situation is changing, young people born in independence are very different, they know several languages and praise and proud of own culture and language , more over some russian kids speaks in turkic languages and go to kazakh, kirgiz , uzbek schools, the process needs time, it cannot change immediately, but the positive pattern is visible
@@Jade-ju1qs I'm glad to hear they have more confidence now
Thanks .
Brilliant
As a Hungarian Archaeologist who specialized in early medieval steppe people, this was one of the most accurate videos I have seen in the topic. However, the over mongolised facial features can be missleading for the watchers, because in reality, these Oghur Turkic tribes (and even the western Xiongnu) had huge local integrated Schytian ancestry in their blood, and even genetical studies show that the majority of the eastern inhabitants in the Avar Khaganate (mostly Kutrigurys,Onogurs under the "true avar leadership") had mixed european-asian ancestry genetically, origanted from the Pontian Steppe. They facial features were likely Europo-mongolid in the leadership, while the commoners, local inhabitants could have been evem totally Europid.
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin.
All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) :
Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars
Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin :
Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can
Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär
Althias = six; from Turkic Alti
Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač
Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam
Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq
Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık
Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ
Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä
Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa
Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake
Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat
Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü
Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä
Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur
Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam
Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan
Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk
Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är
Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ
Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton
Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq
Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči
Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq
Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars
Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun
Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär
Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä
Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun
Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti
Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
What, where is the DNA so we know, man? Even the Ottomans, according to the DNA test, are Persians 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😊
@@user-cg2tw8pw7j according to mullah nationalists, entirety of the world is Persian, in one way or another.
@@doyouwantthetotalwar Brother, I am talking about DNA research
@@user-cg2tw8pw7j Yeah sure buddy. There is the persian DNA in everyone in the world but evil scientist hide it from the people right?
@@doyouwantthetotalwarMy friend, do you see people who look like Chinese in the region?
Excellent. Explains what's going on today. And makes the bible bang on. Thank you
Odoaker's father was a hun officer. In german language Torkeling means Turkling or dyansty of turks
Ediko is not just a Hun officer, he is a Hun.
Wonderful video giving priceless, highly valuable historical informations! Congratulations, you are the best youtuber and history teller ever...
Also, I want to mention about agglutinative linguistic heritage of europe like similarly mentioned as TURCILINGI etc. There is a new language family theory named Dene-Caucasian language family. This family includes both ancient civilizations and modern populations as speaking or have spoken mostly agglutinative languages as listed below:
Dene-Yeniseian (Nadene/Atabasq, Ket, Yeniseian),
Burushaski Hunza,
Elamite-Dravidian (Elamite, Dravidian),
Sumerian,
North Caucasian (Avar Andic, Lezgic),
Tyrrhenian (Etruscan, Raetic),
Vasconic (Basq, Aquitan)...
Especially; tyrrhenian, vasconic languages highly deserve to be mentioned. They were located in west europe, central and south europe as related to modern north italian and basq people. They were Etruscan, Raetic, Basq, Aquitan and I think additionally Saxons, Celts have been related to these tyrrhenian-vasconic people.
Etruscans have lived in north italy in ancient ages as speaking agglutinative languages. They lived for a long time as called themselves as "Rasenna". This name is very similar to Gokturk dynasty "Ashina" and also etruscan mythology includes romus/romulus as descendants of shewolf ("Asena" in turkic mythology).
They had some cities named "Kurt'un" meaning "Wolve's" and "Tarkn'a" meaning "Tarkan's". Also, they have named Rome as "Rum'a" meaning "Grecoroman's". But after they have been defeated by grecoman empire, they have lost their region to grecoromans later and italian language have become an agglutinative + grecoroman mixtures as latin language.
As we can see in this video and history, they did not die or have been assimilated fully. They have protected their agglutinative language partly as named TURCILINGI etc... Similarly, basq people also did not convert to indoeuropean languages fully. Basq people partly protected their agglutinative language as isolate in europe.
Basq people have called themselves as "Eu-Skara" similar to Saka/Sakir or Scythians/Ashkenaz also their name is very similar to Bashkirs which are also direct descendants of Saka/Sakir people in north caucasian, euroasian region. Additionally, Khazars, Balkars are related to Scythians/Ashkenaz in same region.
These people are genetically euroasian, central asian agglutinative speaking people too, who have been partly assimilated or mixed with south caucasian, arian people in caucasia. Even they are speaking or have spoken indoeuropean, they were originally altaian siberian R1a, R1b ydna people genetically.
Additionally, west french aquitan people are related to basq people as having same language sharing vasconic languages. I always think about what happened to those people in west europe and I always get into a conclusion as they have been assimilated to indoeuropean by grecoroman or germanic people.
When we look into many studies, celtic people are stated as euroasian nomads coming from anatolia and/or euroasia. I think celtic people were Saka/Sakir related people having agglutinative languages originally. Also, these people are R1a, R1b ydna genetically originated from altaian siberia.
Moreover, saxons, scots are named similar to Saka/Sakir or Scythian/Ashkenaz, but as migrated to northern side they have been converted to germanic, anglic, nordic indoeuropean languages. These people also have R1a, R1b ydna as genetically related to altaian siberia.
All those dene-caucasian agglutinative language speakers are actually relatives of uralic-altaic agglutinative speakers both linguistically and genetically. Europe has a certain agglutinative speaking heritage and all these people have R1a, R1b ydna genetics originated from altaian siberia.
Also, some people ask me about their reddish hairs after I claim my opinion. I tried to inspect reddish hair and I have realized that most reddish people are Udmurts in euroasia. They have highest T mtdna (upto 40%) as possibly causing reddish hairs because ydna is not related to hair color, eye color etc.
Phenotype is more possible to be related to mtdna haplogroup. (If I am wrong, inform me as scientific) Also Udmurts are uralic, finnic, ugric people who have very high N3 ydna (upto 85%). So meanly, we can see that reddish hairs are also related to uralic-altaic people genetically.
Elamit vasconian etruscan are all agglu and not r1a and r1b
Nothing turcik influlence in this early time in europe .
Turcik have in this early time nothing to do withe the haplogroups r1a and r1b
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pz I am not sure about elamite maybe not, but etruscan are mixture of turkic R1b + grecoroman J2 which led to latin languages actually. North italians who are originally etruscan have 70-80% R1b, what should they have more to be R1a, R1b ydna?
Also, turkic is not only turkish you misunderstand this issue. Saka/Yakut, Soyot, Altai are also turkic from same origin, altaian siberia. All those tagar, baikal, mal'ta buret cultures are real ancestors of that turkic people (east and north euroasians)...
@serkankiden
You are very false
I write you but its dont published
I think i used a word what is not ok für the channel creater
Communication make ob this cannal no sanse
Hello
Test komantar
A passage in the Getica of Jordanes, going back to the fifth-century historian Priscus, gives the answer. "Like a whirlwind of nations the Huns swept across the Alpidzuri, Alcildzuri, Itimari, Tuncarsi, & Boisci who bordered that part of Scythia." As we shall see, the first two names stand for one, the Turkish name Alp-il-čur, which cannot be separated from the Hunnic names ending in -cur. The other names will occupy us later. In the present context this one name, *Alpilčur, suffices to prove the existence of Turkish speaking nomads.
Maenchen-Helfen. The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture. p.23
They disappeared and then he came 😂😂😂😂😂😂
What is a royal tamga of the Dulo dynasty? If matches I might explain who they were.
Learning more about vandalic North Africa would be cool.
Agreed! I found them to be the most interesting people covered here during research.
King Atli=Etzel in the Scandinavian and Germanic Sagas.
This channel is explaining Turkic history so detail and deeply way. Turkic history so old and important in all around the world.Turks are always present at major turning points in history. Thanks for this channel.
10:10 mentioning that some scholars say that Turcilingi is a mistake from Thuringi...
There is a similar trend for the Tyrkae of the 1. Century north of the Asow Sea. They say Plinius made a mistake. It must be Iurkae...😅
Wait a second!
The visigots gepids and alans were tribes of iranian descent ???
The "Iranic" label is associated with the Alans, not the Visigoths or Gepids of course.
👍👍👍
Are you a turk living in germany?
Lastly, as was just seen, the Huns of Europe, who were no doubt of Turkic stock, held sway over the Russian steppe in the region adjoining the Sea of Azov and the mouths of the Don, although the rivalry of their two hordes-Kutrigurs in the west, Uturgurs in the east- undermined their power.
Nonsense.
Alarico was from the east
I gave my Dan file to my true ancestry and Im descended from the Visigoths, Gepids,Avars,Ostrogoths,Vandals and huns and Byzantine empire, and many more.
💝
Early medieval Byzantine and Latin sources confirm the existence of complete contact between the European Huns, Onogurs, Kutrigurs, Utigurs and Bulgars in terms of lineage, language, culture, etc.
Surprisingly, we find that the genealogy in medieval sources places the Huns, Khazars, Bulgars, and Sabir within one group of unbroken lineage.
Here are some excerpts from Procopius's book "The Wars":
"The Huns who are called Sabiri dwell in that region, as well as certain other Hunnic tribes."
“West of the Maeotic Lake, then, and the Tanais River the Cutrigur Huns established their homes over the greater part of the plains of that region.....”.
“Now these envoys were moved by fear of the Utigur Huns in making the public declaration of the object of their coming...”
"In ancient times a vast throng of the Huns ranged over this region which I have just mentioned, and one king had authority over them all. And at one time the power was secured by a certain man to whom two sons were born, one of whom was named Utigur and the other Cutrigur.".
The Utigur ruler Sandilch said:
It is neither fair nor decent to exterminate our tribesmen (the Kutrigurs), who not only speak a language, identical to ours, who are our neighbors and have the same dressing and manners of life, but who are also our relatives, even though subjected to other lords".
Some nationalists who embrace an anti-Turkish ideology are trying to erase this established Turkish history in ancient historical sources, archeology, and elsewhere.
When we look at the historical sources on the history of the Slavic peoples, we find that they accept that most of the ruling dynasties in Middle Slavic history were of Germanic origins (Norman Vikings, Goths, Frankish Germans, and others), and likewise in Middle European history in general, the Germans constituted the ruling element of most of the European kingdoms.
We also find in Central Slavic history that the Germans constituted the main element in the military and cultural elites and the like.
Also, when we look at the Middle Persian sources, we find that they acknowledge that the ruling dynasties of the Hephthalite Huns, the Kidarites Huns, and the Ashina until the late Qajar era were Turks.
But unfortunately, some contemporary Iranian nationalists are trying to remove this established Turkish history through their anti-Turkish ideology, even though the Turks’ contact with the Xiongnu and the Huns has been confirmed in ancient historical sources, including ancient Persian, archeology, and others.
Some Iranian nationalists try to ask naive and superficial questions without sufficient knowledge of the context of ancient history, the paths of migration, the composition of societies, the importance of the presence of the class of warrior soldiers, the class of military and political leaders within the societal system, and others.
The ancient Persian sources were more open and broad-minded than some contemporary Iranian nationalists.
The Hunnic inscription on a dinner plate belonging to the last ruler of the Huns, Dengizich, was identified as Turkic, Hunnic sample of Khan Diggiz plate ;
kinkeg dikkiz ükü essä - kijü sax sax saxynil gür täηrig
English translation : Beware of king Dikkiz the Wise's blow ! Retreat to the Tengri(God) beyond the world!
Where is this to see?
to lie 😂😂😂😂😂
Dengiz and Chengiz come from same Word”Tengiz” which mean sea.
How did the byzantines come up with the name "Turk" when they send a crown to arpad iirc with description " king of Turks" on it? Did rhe people living under those khaganates called themselfs Turk at that time?
Arpad's Hungary had Turkic founding components such as the tribes of Kabars & Onogurs(whom the exonym Hungary is named after) the Romans were aware of this Turkic affiliation hence the title king of Turks and the mention of "Tourkia" for the Hungarian realm
That is the correct answer. Keep in mind, however, that later on many people who somehow migrated from Central Asia and were nomads at the time of their arrival in Europe or the Middle East were also called „Turk“, even in the case of no relations to the Turks whatsoever. In the case of the Magyars however the proximity to the Turkic world is very much proven.
@@KhansDen"Scythian" "Hun" & "Turk" were indeed generic names applied to all Eurasian nomadic entities that flocked into Europe regardless of their actual ethno-linguistic origin
@@nenenindonu”Mongol” “Tatar” too
@@papazataklaattiranimam "Cimmerian" and "Magog" too
And also the 10 Lost tribes of Israel
We Gujars are Hunnic though now completely Indianized.
Very respectfully Mr gujars confirm first who is your father or born as ba***d
Dengizić...it sound like Slavic lastname(Serbian)...IĆ...
A Germán - jól láthatóan, szeretné magának
- kisajátitani ...
a Szkíta multat ! ! ! *
😮
other than snits and giggles what is the point of studying any of these groups? did they develop Cold Fusion or discover the cure for cancer? what scientific or technological advances did any of these folks leave as a legacy? what contributions to the Arts did any of them make? great paintings, plays, poetry, symphonies? can someone explain how the study of these people is relevant for those of us living in the present? their history just seems to be a never ending parade of warlords and aggression. no rise of democratic republics or industrial revolutions or Renaissance!
You just summed up all of history until the 18th century.
Elmondom a vivmányok egy kis töredékét .....
*
Dengiz(ik)-Sea
Deniz🇹🇷👋
Theophylact Simocattes asserts that Bayan's people had only adopted the awe-inspiring name of the Avars proper and that in fact the two tribes of these Pseudo-Avars, the Var & the Chunni (Huns), were of the same origin and spoke the same language, as the peoples joining them later; they belonged to the Oghur ethnic group which spoke in all probability an Altaic or to be more exact a Bulghar Turkic dialect.
Denis Sinor | The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, 1990 (pp.222)
It's likely that the Hunnic component of the Avars more correctly Varchonites had its roots from the White Huns near the Aral Sea rather than those that invaded Europe
@@nenenindonuHow did you know that they were of the same origin? Were you with them? Even the Persian merchants, when they entered the Hun regions, saw only the Persian tribes, the Goths, the Scythians, the Sarmatians, and others. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
16:30= Today , they are in hungary too , all of them . Etc...
The Bulgarian self-name onogundur has nothing to do with the term Turkic onogur ten tribes! You are refuting yourself in the false statement that all the tribes in the wilderness were Turkic, which you also voiced!
What do you think Bulgar and Onogur mean then? Bulgar is not "belaya gora" as some lunatic Slavics hold, they sure are the same peoples.
@@yagmuralksal4762 Both the Slavs and the Turks are wrong, because as it is also said in the video, the Bulgarians never called themselves ten tribes in Turkic, but onogundur in their own separate language! You weren't paying attention! Let the Slavic and Turkic camps calmly stop shouting the delusions that everyone belonged to our people! No scientific evidence for these misconceptions has ever existed!
@@tiboruhrin4080 "On Ogur" in Bulgar is "On Oguz" in Turkish
@@yagmuralksal4762The video also features the Bulgarian self-name onogondur! You deliberately don't want to understand! Let it go, because your error is harmful to your health! Not everyone was Turkic in the wilderness! That's it!
@@tiboruhrin4080If you're Bulgarian, then shame on you for not accepting your roots.
The biggest misconception about the hunnic empire. The word turk was first mentioned on the Orkhon inscriptions in Mongolia in the 8th century ad. Huns, Bulgars they were a mix of many people and nations. Bulgars and Huns are on the political scene way earlier than the appearing of the Turks in the world
By your logic there were no Mongols whatsoever until 1206 because the word „Mongol“ only appears after that time. Same goes for the bulgars whose name only appears after 600.
Perfect logic.
@@Red6Games Exactly, ask mongols how they call themselves. This is how you will know who is who. What you are is not a name, it is an idea. Bulgars and Huns were totally different by what you call Turks, which came years later. Same goes for the name Byzantium empire, which is another western word, which was made up in the 18-19 century ad, and yes although official language in the Eastern Roman empire was Greek, the culture and people were mixed and not only Greek.
@@Red6Games his logic is complete gibberish, the fact that the ethnonym "Turk" wasn't in common use at that time doesn't mean that Turkic people as an ethno-linguistic group didn't exist, I guess he doesn't know what language the Bulgars spoke 😂
@@Red6Games and one more thing, Bulgars we're first mentioned in 480 Ad, and were regarded as allies of emperor Zeno, although there are old Eastern sources mostly from Armenia but also Persians and chinese which are mentioning Bulghar or Vulghar around the first century AD
@@nenenindonu your logic is gibberish, following this you can conclude that just because the Mayans and the Egyptians built pyramids, they are the same people
Turks are everywhere
Turkic dynasties like Dulo, Arpad and Seljuk claimed descent from Huns😎
But only the Dulo considered providing a proper cogent genealogy through Attila's son Ernac
I claim descent from the Huns
Attila is my ancestor
He isn’t
Everybody's ancestor probably, at least in West Eurasia. We all have ancestry from the same people living so far back in time (pedigree collapse) at least in the context of Europe (and probably extending into West and Central Asia, as well as North Africa). Of course some people's heritage went extinct but otherwise they scattered around.
@@LuisAldamizYou mean Aryans?
Yep, though I would say Uldin, the grandfather of Attila is a better choice. He is said to be the source of Odin. Uldin the Allfather.
Onogurs=O'n O'q=Ten Arrow tribal federation.
So the oghuz?
Oghuz means (Öküz) Ox in Turkish@@tnrz5696
H/UNI means UNIted, Guros is man or warior. No turk etimology.
AI content? not even care to put your own voice?
Rome collected and synthesized ancient civilizations (Greek, Phoenician, Etruscan, Egyptian, etc.), implementing and spreading them on a large scale in Europe and around the world. Western civilization is romanized because the European barbarians did not give any added value to civilization.
Origin - Germannak és a töröknek - köze nincs , a Hunokhoz ! ! ! ....
*
( Talán-csak annyi, hogy rájuk települnek ..... ! *
:)
The Hun State is one hundred percent Turkish
Hülyeség ! ! ! .....
*
A Hunoknak a magyarokhoz - és... rokon népeihez van köze.
- ilyen a törökök elődnépe , őse
- akiből a Török kelettkezett ...
Később ..... !
- ilyen nép - a Szkita ..... ! *
A Szíta - a török népek - őse..... !
Anatolia - Turkmenistan ...
- valamint - jónéhány szkita népet nyilvánitottak germánná, aki - nem az... ! ! !
vagy csak töredék részben - az !
A legrégebbi - török orszagi népesség - Szkíta ! - akikből később törökök - lesznek !
- részben... !
A German népek - nagy része -
Nem germán... - csak azzá keresztelték - hatalmi alapon
Pedig nem germanok ! *
- csak papiron - germánok !!
:)
@@el-arabist - tanulj még , Történelmet..... !
Vedd észre, hogy nem létező ismeretlen népek keletkeznek
a semmiből.... kapnak nevet...
...és létező , valóságos népek tünnek el - a semmibe ....... !
:)
@@el-arabist - Magyar, az ős..... !
Ebből lesz, Hun - Szkita -
a török - legkésőbbi .... !
Az oszmán , pedig nem érinti az ős- törököt .... !
:)
Un - Uno... azt jelenti - Első !
1 .....
A hazugoknak jó , ha csak Jézus után kezdi targyalni a Hunt - amely 20 - 40 000 éves
!!! *
turcilingi… lol turkling
In min all hunnic looks white. In chinese chronicles too. Why in this films are only the female persons are white and the male are so tan?
It is not historyclie correct.
You are the wrong one, f off with the bullshit. The Huns are of East Asian and look East Asian. It's historical fact. Not everything is white, you racist.
Attila is a Bulgarian from the Bulgarian family Dulo. Huns is not an ethnic group, but a name for a group of united tribes. The European Huns have nothing to do with the Turks. Nor are the Hunnu confederation Turks. Hunnu confederation are 24 tribes. As well as the tribes that Attila ruled are a huge number and there are no Turks among them. The Turks appear in the 6th century. This is Turkish propaganda.
And the queen was german and englands actual language was britanica and the germanic people made english. Also hungry is predominant turkic and hans. Hans were all east wuropeans to asia and parts of middle east. So stfu.
These people turned to turkic people which made turkey today so what propaganda you talkiang bout? Lmao learn your history not just a pathetic fun fact. Pagan
The Slavic tribes of Venedae was by Iranic origin! They came from that region between Caucasus Mountain and Caspian Sea, near Northern Iran, not from Belarus, European Russia, Ukraine, Poland!
This has no histirical nothing.
And invention
Go and study
I graduated in history. How about you?
Just read "De Administrando Imperio" written by the 10th-century Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine VII for his son. The book literally open with suggestions on how to deal with Turks and Huns.
Only 3 main peoples are majority in Europe right now: Celt, Germanic, and Slavic people. We Turkic-Steppe people has been dominated Europe for centuries. It's time to make Europe Turkic great again.
The Scythians, the Sarmatians, and the Alans: not while I exist