This took a long time and a lot of effort to make. Hope you enjoy. And in case you want some of the images used in this video digitally, go to my profile on ArtStation. There, you can purchase a 9-image pack of images that show the lifestyle, religion, warfare and people of the Huns in Europe. ---> www.artstation.com/a/30441503 The portrait of Attila, the last great king of the Huns and the most infamous of them all, that is also shown on the thumbnail is further available as PRINT (poster, canvas etc.): ---> artstn.co/pp/ap/10zbX With each purchase you will support this channel, and every dime is going to be invested into the next projects. Thank you.
I've heard that the Huns introduced the stir-ups to the Ancient European. It was supposed to be the reason that the Huns were able to have an edge over the Romans
@@kolfibrown6540 - Very arguable: the stirrup debate is endless, the most clear evidence seems to lead to the Avars but it may have existed earlier in Europe, nobody knows for sure, as the earliest stirrups would have just been made of perishable materials. Also it's not clear that the stirrup was such an advantage relative to Roman saddles, which were very secure. It seems that early stirrups were mer aids for less fit people to climb to the horse and may have only been placed on one side. The Hunnic advantage was surely bow and arrow, which requires intense training, rather than a relatively passive element like the stirrup... but all may help.
@@KhansDen Attila was the ancestor of Mongols and round face asian people but he was very very clever man he gathered all the armies of Asia and came to europe because he promised them gold, he also destroyed many places who did not want to join in and that is why people are confused but in reality he was just a round face ASIAN man...where the white huns lived in southren afghnistan all the way to china in the desert area...
According the Hungarian chronicles, Attila and his troops stayed on the battle field and buried the dead enemy, and burned their own dead soldiers. After this they stopped in Rome. Pope Leo came to the gates of Rome. A short time later Attila and his troop left. So the so called barbarian didn't burn Rome like the Germans and others did before and after.
@@accaeffe8032 There were seven Magyar tribes, but other elements were part of the federation, including three tribes of Turkic Khazars (the Kavars). Either because of this fact or perhaps because of a memory of earlier conditions, this federation was known to its neighbours as the On-Ogur (literally “Ten Arrows” or “Ten Tribes”).
@@weekendoffender44 < but that was one of the seven tribes , the onugors - on ugors . But like that , was over 107-110 on ugors tribe .of Attila , the avars just added they tribes and the magyars added , knows seven main tribes + they slaves [ slaves ] . So , just like any other main tribes , inside was many branches of tribes . The " sakas = székes -> székelys ! " .
One interesting data about the "barbaric" Attila: In 476 the Roman empire was ended, when the last emperor, Augustus Romulus was dethroned by Odoaker, and Odoaker became the king of Italy. And who were they? Augustus Romulus was the son of the first secretary of Attila (Orestes). And Odoaker was a son of the commander of Attila's bodyguard (Edeko). So how "barbarian" Attila could be, if his first secretary's son became later the last Roman emperor, and his bodyguard's commander's son became later the first Italian king?
Because never ending butthurt of europeans. They never come peave with the reailty of dominated by nomads of asia. Its just big black hole of their record. Last over a millenia.
@@resadbehramov4130😂😂😂 You are very dumb to say this. Obviously. It is obvious because the European propaganda, you try to speak about, was always against Hungarians. So you could never hear about these details mentioned anywhere untill now. These details I highly doubt that you will ever hear from Western European sources. European propaganda 😂😂😂 For who? You? 😂 Your comment is a killer 😂 of reason, and reality both.
This is by far the best and most informative documentary about this topic I have seen. Delicious style and magnifitient illustrations. Gettin better and better. Enjoyed alot. Please more.🐎🐎🐎
It was an informative and wonderful explanation of Huns history. and their's relationships to Turkik tribe's..Huns influences in India, Persians, east and west Rome empires....thank you for sharing
Thank you for the video. You have amazingly accurately reproduced the appearance of the Huns. I am simply amazed at how accurately artificial intelligence reproduced the images of the Huns (Xiongnu). This is simply excellent. I just began to believe even more that our Chuvash ancestors were Xiongnu. I have photographs of my relatives and they are 100 percent similar to your photographs of the Huns. It is something. I'm just touched. It was as if I saw my distant relatives. The Chuvash are descendants of the Xiongnu. That's for sure. Both in language and now in appearance... I'm sure. It was they who invisibly drew your portraits of the Huns. We Chuvash even have a clan called Mushchak (Attila’s father), I found out last week. Your hand and thoughts are invisibly led in the right direction by our great ancestors - the Xiongnu. In Chuvash, man is translated as Shun. Tavtapushch sir (in Chuvash this means thank you) We have an ancient saying that if the Chuvash disappear, the world will disappear. The Huns, represented by the Chuvash, have not left the world stage of history. They, as before, will still say their word for the glory of humanity.... Tour Shchirlakh!!!
Khan's Den it's another level, awesome! It's clear if we look Turkic countries general history only their founders gain their top. Land area, army, supplies extra. Like Atilla the hun, The Temur, mamluk sultans acros afro-asia except ottomans
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
Yes, however the the staple of he Ottoman military was a well oiled disciplined light infantry, not mounted archers. Ottomans did not used mounted archers. Seljuk Turks did, but not the Ottomans. The Ottomans often paired up with the Tartars who did use mounted archers, but not always.
It was not always impossible to beat horse archers though. China with extensive history of fighting nomads, realized they can simply get lots of shield and lots of crossbows. They've had crossbows way before Europe had and they were able to field large armies of crossbowmen and this countered the nomads easily. The crusaders in middle east did the same tactic by using lots of crossbows and just volley firing into horse formations who had no armor to protect against crossbows. WHAT WAS HARD however, was that the nomads were extremely mobile and they can quickly move from one location to another without having to worry about supply chains being stretched. When the Chinese chased the Xiongnu armies deep into their territories, the Chinese armies eventually stretched themselves too thin and their flanks got harassed slowly. Chinese armies would win battles but it wasn't enough to be decisive until the Chinese themselves adopted horse archery to counter back and chase after them.
@@mr.purple1779tell em brother. These people from Turkey are delusional af. They share no genetic resemblance to old turkic people. They were just under them and adapted their culture and language. They were colonized persian people not turkic people.
THE SON OF ATTILA Following the assassination of Attila , the great Hun warrior , the German tribes rose up in rebellion . Many bloody battles ensued , as Teutons battled Huns . In the Carpathian Mountains , the outnum bered Huns were forced to seek reinforcements . Alone , with only a small group of warriors , Csaba , the youngest son of Attila and leader of the Székely tribe , left the scene . He took a group of his greatest warriors and body guards , and fought his way out of the enemy encirclement . He then rode east to raise another army and return to their settled homeland . He made good on his promise , more than once . As time passed , legends grew up around the returning chief and his Hun warriors . Today , over campfires , as the legends are recounted , children look up to the starry milky way and see its river of stars , the Hadak útja ( Warriors Avenue ) , and know that Attila and their ancient ancestors will return with their mighty armies of courageous warriors from the stars , to protect their homeland , and the Carpathians , the heart of the empire of the Huns . Dante Mena.Hunter Publishing.Adventure Guide to Cuba.p.47
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin. All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) : Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
Hun Empire, Xianbei Empire, Rouran Empire, GokTurkic Empire, Uyghur Empire, Kyrgyz Khanate, Khitan Empire, Tatar-Mongol Empire. All these empires founded in the same place. Which nation would you like to call Turkic ? Why so many fake Turkic nations.
It's evident that Hunnic was an Oghur Turkic language related to Bulgar hence the concept of "Hunno-Bulgar", the Chuvash language remains the only surviving member of this archaic branch
Bulgars or Bolghars were probably one of the main offshoots of the Western Huns (Attila's) but there were others. They speak Turkic to this very day (Chuvash), although their Danubian relatives were Slavized from below, illustrating probably which was one of the features of Hunnic expansion: silent Slavic expansion as their vassals.
@@LuisAldamiz correct, Slavic settlement in much of the Balkans is mostly attributed to the activities of Oghuric entities like Bulgars & Avars, the depopulation of the region at the hands of the Huns also eased the whole process
This can be surmised by analysing the names of Hunnic princes and tribes. The names of the following Hunnic princes are clearly Oghuric Turkic in origin: Mundzuk (Attila’s father, from Turkic Muncˇuq = pearl/jewel; for an in-depth discussion of the Hunnic origin of this name in particular see Schramm (1969), 139-40), Oktar/Uptar (Attila’s uncle, Öktär = brave/powerful), Oebarsius (another of Attila’s paternal uncles, Aïbârs = leopard of the moon), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qarâton = black-cloak), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bârsig˘ = governor), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig˘ , meaning brave or noble, or Quršiq meaning beltbearer). For these etymologies see Bona (1991), 33. Three of Attila’s known sons 40 have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila’s princi pal wife, the mother of the ‘crown prince’ Ellac, has the Turkic name Here kan, as does another notable wife named Eskam. See Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 392-415. See also Bona (1991), 33-5, and Pritsak (1956), 414. Most known Hunnic tribal names are also Turkic, Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 427-41, e.g. Ultincur, Akatir etc. The cur suffix in many of these names is a well-known Turkic title and as Beckwith (1987), 209, points out the To-lu or Tardus tribes (Hunnic in origin) of the Western Turkish On Oq were each headed by a Cur (noble). Zieme (2006), 115, speculates that the title cur belongs to a pre-Turkic Tocharian stratum of the Turkic language, which, if true, again highlights the essential heterogeneity of Central Asian peoples and even languages. See also Aalto (1971), 35. In addition to this primary language (Oghuric Turkic), Priscus informs us that Latin and Gothic were also understood by the Hunnic elite. See Priscus, fr. 13.3, Blockley (1983), 289. Mclaughlin, Professors Hyun & Lieu, Rome and China: Points of Contact (Routledge, 2021)
Very nice documentary! In Hungary there are also some archaeological remains of the Huns such as gilded bows and Hunnic cauldrons. The name of the town of Buda comes from Attila's brother according to medieval chroniclers and a nice epic story rivalising with King Arthur's. Actually this is one of the many speculations of medieval historians recreating their past from placenames, because the name Buda comes from "oven" in Slavic and that is the meaning of the name used in medieval German also for Buda: "Ofen" (much like "oven" in English), the town being mostly inhabited by Germans in the Middle Ages, and probably founded on Slavic grounds like many other places in Hungary (example: Visegrad, meaning High Castle in Slavic). There was a strong medieval tradition of connecting the Magyars to the Huns, mainly by monks writing in their monasteries and making simplified etymological guesses as they were accustomed to in those times, guided by Isidore of Seville's Etymologicae. In the same sense, medieval French said they descended from Troy, because of prince Paris... But beyond the medieval storytellers about the Huns and Attila, we did actually have many relations with Turkish tribes and have a lot of Turcick loanwords in the Hungarian language (but also many Iranian ones and even more Slavic and German). The relation between the eastern Ural where magyars come from and the Altai is a very old one as they were directly connected by the Irtysh and the Ob rivers and these relations can alreaady be demonstrated in the Bronze Age, so there are also genetic links between Magyars and Turks going back to Prehistory and also from historical times as many Turcick tribes were actually integrated into the Hungarian kingdom, not the least the Petchenegs and the Koumans (Kipchaks).
The exonym Hungary also derives from a Hunnic sub-clan, the Onogurs, who together with the Kabars were a founding component of the Hungarian nation taking part in the Arpad led Magyar conquest of the Pannonian Basin
@@maximus3160 Moreover, it is suggested that Hungarian conquerers together with the Turkic-speaking Kabars moved in and integrated the “Avar” (including Onoghurs, Proto-Hungarians etc.) people. Wang, Chuan-Chao; Posth, Cosimo; Furtwängler, Anja; Sümegi, Katalin; Bánfai, Zsolt; Kásler, Miklós; Krause, Johannes; Melegh, Béla (28 September 2021)"Genome-wide autosomal, mtDNA, and Y chromosome analysis of King Bela III of the Hungarian Arpad dynasty"
@Protagorasz well I didn't make it up, it is the opinion of historians and linguists in Hungary for at least a century and a half, when historical criticism and scholarship developed in Hungary as in Western Europe at about the same time. Why does this upset you? The brother of Attila is what medieval chroniclers wrote and they are notoriously bad historians and linguists: not seeing much difference between Arthurian legend, Bible and history.
@Protagorasz Please note also that Buda was not the capital of the kingdom of Hungary, it was Fehérvár. Buda became the seat of the Hungarian king soon after the mongol invasion in 1242 -the legend of Buda being Attila's city appeared precisely at that time, as well as the integration of French origin legends from Troy, like the name Sicambria for Buda, due to close relations with the French - Béla IV descended partly from the Capetian kings. Buda appears as "Offen" in German maps of Hungary as late as the 18th century. I don't know if these refered to potters' ovens, metallurgy or something else... but as your pseudo seems to indicate you are Hungarian you can easily check yourself in historical books on Budapest or on medieval Hungary.
How different were the Huns from the Mongols? Especially in terms of military technology. Did the Huns use stirrups? Also did the Mongols had better horses than the Huns because of 800+ years of selective breeding and improvement?
Mongols were more advanced, evidently, because they came later and built their organization on the system Scythians and Huns built before them. Huns used straight swords and asymmetrical bows, Mongols used curved swords and symmetrical bows. For the military unit consisting 10 000 men ancient Hungarians used the word "tömény", and the Mongols used the same, "tuemen". I bet they used the same small but sturdy Asian horses.
29:39 Also haben sich die Hunnen-Germanen-Römer mit Römer-Germanen-Hunnen gefetzt wie wahre Cousins HAHAHAHHA aber realtalk spannende sicht du hast mehr abos verdient
Awesome channel, new sub! I have one of those last names that's hard to say and somewhat ornate in origin. I usually encourage them to try to pronounce it and guess where it's from as roll call at school and in sports was always akward growing up. My great grandfather escaped Hungary at the start of WW1 and ended up in Trenton NJ. I love all of this stuff!
You're planning a video about the Magyar khanate, If no take the suggestion. I wan to know about the beginning and the role of the western realms in the consolidation of the Magyar realms in Hungarian lands.
Wonderful documentary, great job! You have a shining talent about history telling. Wonderful explanations about hunnic subempires like blue, red, white, golden huns. Blue huns were Gokturks in east, white and red huns were Hephtalites, Alchons in south, golden huns were Atilla's huns in northwest related to turkic region. Even today we can see turkic language region in language maps as reference. I think Xiongnu was an eastern hun + mongol tribes union in east. On the west, there was a western hun (saka, sumer) + iranic union named Saka/Scythian. Their ancestors were turkic, ugric, sumerian people who have mixed with persian and arian people of mesopotamia and caucasia. Saka people are called in I. Darius' writing as foreign, central asian people. They were elder allies, later enemies for persians. Sumerians have migrated to balkans, central europe partly mixing with grecoromans in anatolia and italian peninsula. They named themselves as Rasenna (Etruscans). They had a turkic-like culture and agglutinative language. Also, they spread to west as vasconic (basq, aquitan as also mentioned in this video) and to north as saxonian. Vasconic people also have spoken agglutinative in west, but saxonians have converted to germanic languages by gothic, nordic tribes. If we inspect linguistically, in recent linguistic theories sumerian, vasconic, tyrrhenian, north caucasian (including avar andic), nadene/atabasq, yeniseian languages are classified in a new language family named dene-caucasian language family which is mostly agglutinative and relative to uralic-altaic languages. They all have originated from southeast asian agglutinative languages. If we inspect genetically, southeast asians had C1b, D, K2b ydna genetics and spread to australia, polynesia, west and east austronesia, southern east asia, northern east asia, north euroasia, siberia, americas, central asia, east euroasia, west euroasia, india and west europe. They have spoken agglutinative languages mostly and had genetically mutated descendant haplogroups of C1b, D, K2b ydna. I can summarize them as general: C1b, C2 - east austronesian, polynesian, C3 - mongolic, tungusic, C4 - aboriginal australian, D, D1, D2 - tibetan, burman, andamanese, D3 - ainu, jomon japanese, K2b, P - aeta, negrito, philippinese, malaisian, M, S - papuan, new guinean, N, N1 - proto-uralic, N2, N3 - uralic, finnic, samoyedic, O - thai-kadai, O1, O2 - west austronesian, sinitic, O3 - koreanic, japonic, P1 - altaic, altaian, tuvan, soyot turkic, Q, Q1a - ket, yeniseian, Q1b - nadene/atabasq, native american, R, R1 - mal'ta buret culture, uyghur turkic, R1a - hunnic, turkic, ugric, european hunnic (khazar, tatar, avar, magyar, balkar, old bolgar, oghur), indian hunnic (chionit, kidarit, hephtalit, alchon, gaznevit, timurit, baburit), R1b - sumer, saka, scythian, turkmen, turk, azeri/khazar, oghuz, gagauz, bashkir, basq, aquitan, vasconic, tyrrhenian, raetic, etruscan, old saxonian, old gaulic, old scottish etc), R2 - dravidian, srilankan... Also, maternally southeast asian mtdna haplogroups are distinct from european R mtdna major group (H, V, J, T, U, K mtdna). Just B, F, P mtdna haplogroups migrated together with southeast asian mtdna people like M mtdna major group (E, Q, O, C, D, G, Z mtdna) and N mtdna major group (A, X, S, I, W, Y mtdna). E, O, P, Q, S mtdna and partly other B, M, N mtdna have remained in west, east austronesia, australia, polynesia. Other group have migrated to northern east asia and north euroasia together with ydna haplogroups. Some part of A, B, C, D, X mtdna have migrated to americas together with C3, R, Q1b ydna. Some part of A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, W, X, Y, Z mtdna have remained in north asia, northeast asia, siberia or migrated to west into east euroasia and central asia together with C3, N2, N3, Q1a, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna. They have constructed those hunnic empires, sumerian, scythian civilisations etc. in history. Those were altai region originated asiatic people. After they come across with the fusional language speaking (indoeuropean, afroasiatic) people, they have mixed eachother resulting to different nations including both uralic-altaic, dene-yeniseian and indoeuropean, afroasiatic people in different regions. Roman vs Hunnic war was including these different but mixed eastern and western tribes in both side.
@@maximus3160 Both Sakas and Huns have altaic origins genetically as being descendants of altaic (altaian, tuvan, uyghur turkic) people. Is there any genetic evidence collapsing my theory? Unfortunately no! If you have an idea, I am open to listen.
In a manuscript of Otto of Freising's History of Two Cities an editor, seemingly from the thirteenth century, added a marginal note to a passage describing the conversion of a king of the Huns at the time of the Emperor Justinian. This note commented that the Turks' were formerly known as 'Huns' and that Western Huns are now called Hungarians and Avars. This comment, whilst obscure and late, demonstrates that this author at least understood that a link existed between the Turks and Hungarians. There is an earlier source that makes a similar point. This is the Chronicle of Montecassino, which in an account of the First Crusade's crossing of Asia Minor, refers to the Seljuk Turkish ruler, Qilij Arslan of Nicaea, as the 'king of Huns, who now we call Turks
Sogdian sources mention that the Turks are closely related to the Huns. Also, Indian sources mentioned that the Turks are related to the Huns. And the Byzantine sources confirmed that the Bulgarians are the same as the Huns, and the Bulgarian kings confirmed in their sources and inscriptions that they were descended from the lineage of the Hun kings.
The oldest runes are from Norway, and are approximately 1800-2000 years old. They seem to be influenced by Latin and Etruscan. However, Runes were used by all Germanic tribes, even in present day Hungary.
I'd say that the actual legacy of the White Huns are the Hazara and not at all the Pashtun. They do carry (among other East Asian genetics) the so-called "Genghis Khan lineage", however I'm persuaded that's not a Mongolian heritage but a much older one ("molecular clock" is rubbish, at least the way shcolastic orthodoxy uses it), one that almost certainly pertains to the Turkic/Hunnic expansion. Also notice the similitude Hazara = Khazars.
Khalaj people also have a good claim on the White Huns since some of their successor polities were ethnically Khalaj (Zunbils & Turk Shahis) although White Huns themselves were more likely Oghuric, the Hunnic component in the Varchonites is also assumed to be of White Hun stock
@@nenenindonu - Maybe, I'm not familiar with that nation (just learning about them as we speak). I also don't really understand what "Oghur(ic)" means, aren't all Turkics Oghuric? Which Turkics (other than maybe weird Siberian branches like the Yakut) are not Oghuric? When did the Oghur concept first coalesced?
@@LuisAldamizIt's still debated when exactly the Oghur Turkic-Common Turkic separation occurred however the former got greatly replaced by the latter today all Turkic languages other than Chuvash belong to Common Turkic
@@nenenindonu - Yakut/Sakha included? That suggests that Oghur is core-Turkic and that Bulgars (proto-Chuvash) may have been indeed an admixed population with a creole dialect of their own. A wild guess anyhow.
@@LuisAldamizYakut also belongs to the Siberian branch of Common Turkic, Chuvash is a very obscure language with a considerable Finno-Ugric component, it's also fascinating how it didn't get Kipchakized due to the imperial influence of the Golden Horde unlike other originally non-Kipchak languages like Kyrgyz, Kazakh,...
38:36 That's to nicest statue I've ever seen in my life. Probably also one of the biggest. At first I thought that the horse was too small. Later I learned that back then they had small horses/ pony's. It's an old breed. Those big horses we are custom to in EU weren't there yet.
Thanks you so much for this history lesson! Please mark Budapest correctly on map. The marking should be more to the west and upwards where the Danube turns south. Now the marking point is set by the Tisza river.
Are you crazy? The Bulgars were by yellow race from Central Asia! A Turkic-Mongol population! Not white! Not European! Turco-Mongols like the Hungarians, Estonians and Finns!@@ds-on4sm
Man, his race were yellow! Because the Huns came from Central Asia! His face were Mongolic! Not white! The race of Huns were yellow race not white race! The old Bulgarians were Turco-Mongolian! The old Bulgarians came from Central Asia too!!! Now, the Bulgarian people is European and Balkanic because they assimilated white people from Balkans like Tracians, Latins, Greeks etc.! Now, they are white!!! The most Bulgarians are European natives assimilated by the old Proto-Bulgarians1 Clear?@@ds-on4sm
Attila the Hun, one of history's most feared leaders, once set his sights on the region now known as Romania. During the 5th century, Attila led the Huns in a series of invasions across Europe, and Romania’s territory, with its strategic Carpathian Mountains and proximity to the Roman Empire, was a key area for his campaigns. Although Attila never fully conquered the land, his incursions left a lasting mark on Romania’s early history, shaping its cultural landscape and historical narratives.
The painting shown in 19:48 is called ''Asparukh (such a Turkic name, isn't it?) at the Battle of Ongal'' by Vasil Goranov, and the sword on the book's cover in 26:20 is the sword of Kubrat, the founder of Bulgaria. Also, Modern genetic studies of bone material from Bulgarian burials from the period of the early Middle Ages clearly shows that the ethnic appearance of the discovered bodies belongs to the Indo-European group. Archaeologically, the Proto-Bulgarians belong to the Sarmato-Alan cultures. The Proto-Bulgarians as inhabitants of the lands north of the Caucasus in the 2nd century are mentioned by the Armenian historian Movses Khorenatsi. In his History of Armenia, written in the 80's of the 5th century AD, he speaks about two migrations of Proto-Bulgarians from Caucasus to Armenia. Proto-Bulgarians lived amongst Sarmato-Alan and Slavic tribes for centuries before migrating to the Balkans. However, Turkic elements could also be found due to the influence of the Avars (mostly) and the Göktürks. Most of the names of the rulers and aristocrats of the First Bulgarian Empire are of Iranian origin. Names such as Sinnion, Zabergan, Kubrat/Xovrat, Bezmer/Bozmihr, Asparukh, Tervel, Kormes, Sevar, Kardam, Krum, Omurtag/Murtag, Negavon, Okorsis/Korsis, Malamir, Boris, Rasate, etc., are proven to be (Indo)Iranian and generally Indo-European in origin (and etymology) and does not have Turkic analogues. The last pagan ruler of Bulgaria was literally called Persian/Presian. There is NO historical source or evidence of Tengrism in Bulgaria. The only "evidence" that suggests the alleged presence of ''Tangra/Tengri'' in the Bulgarian lands is a damaged fragmentary inscription found near Madara. The argument that the name "Tangra" was written on it has been refuted many times over the years.
@@ds-on4sm This is the first time I see someone so fiercely insisting that he's a descendant of a bare footed slave (Slav) wearing a single linen shirt, instead of a Turk Warrior in full mail armor. 😆
here was a migration of nations. So the Huns moved to Europe and died out. They could not leave descendants. Roman Empire to rule the state needs a font Then what script did the Huns writhe in. The Mongol Empire is a fact Hun Empire fantasy. That's why get tangled up there Mongols When the Huns lived next to the Mongols do not hlave Mongolian language Mongols are not Turks not Muslims Thise were the clan wars Not nations. Dzingischan built roads After which he went the shop. So that foods would not be stolen He was bringing the law did nothing for fame
Balamber is the ancestor of the Oghuz. Balaam-ber means the one who gives a son or the one who gives children. The Hunnic Empire and the period of rule: (374 - 496) Balamber, (Balamir) (374 - Unknown) Uldiz (west) (380? - 410), son or grandson of Balamber Carton (west) (410 - 422) Rua (422 - 434), brother of Muncuk, Aybars and Oktar Attila (434 - 453), son of Muncuk Ilek (453 - 454), son of Attila Dengizik (454 - 496), son of Attila Irnek (496 - Unknown), son of Attila
Kubrat is %100 Turkish name. Like Arpat abd Asparukh. These names are still used as names or surnames in Turkish countries. All pre-Christian Bulgarian kings have Turkish names. Even the titles they take are Turkish.
Being Hungarian is a proud beauty.. Nowadays, people believe again in fate, in God... More and more people are saying the idea that: There are no coincidences! If this is true, everything that happens in our world has a reason, then can we ignore the fact that we were born Hungarian? Or, there are no coincidences, but that doesn't matter? Of course! If you were born here, you have a duty! Completing the task begins with the fact that we do not gloss over our Hungarianness, but find out what it means to be Hungarian. What kind of task has God (fate, universe...) assigned us as Hungarians. Árpád's Hungarians come to the inheritance of Atilla the Hun, as descendants to the Carpathians, Hunnia, Hungary. They take possession of the rightful inheritance, without a fight, because it turns out that the people who live here speak our language, our relatives. The Turul dynasty, of which Atilla is a member, was called the Árpád house in the Middle Ages, and can present one of the oldest family trees in the world, as Atilla descends from Nimród. According to our able chronicle, our first king was Atilla and our first king István. It's not a mistake, that's what the chronicle says about both of them. So we have a ruling family with the oldest ancestry in Europe and a rightful heritage, the Carpathians, the Carpathian Basin. There are many things that connect us with certain peoples connected here, of whom we can also say - and I say - our relatives. The Greeks describe the Scythians as saying that their soldiers retreat in battle, then unexpectedly attack back and destroy the ranks of the enemy, who were already confused in the pursuit, with a counterattack. This is what the Romans wrote about the Parthians, from whom they suffered a crushing defeat twice. This is the news about the Huns, the Avars, and about us Hungarians as well. In fact, our national symbol, the falcon that forms the basis of TURUL, also fights in the air in this way. We know from our legislation that at first it consists of only 5 points (the blood contract), then it expands, again and again by recording freedoms when they seem to be forgotten. According to the Greeks, the Scythians carry the truth not in the law book, but in their hearts. Atilla, God's Whip, is stern but fair. It is based on his judgment that he destroys entire cities, at other times he leaves a monastery or a church if he finds righteous people, and sometimes he pardons the entire city, see the case of Rome. We do not sign a contract in front of a notary, but in an authentic place (presbytery, canonry), in front of God. In case of breach of contract, God's Judgment is common. The most common is the ordeal by fire, which in the 1300s ended with more than 50% healing. Our relationship with God, loyalty to the truth plays a prominent role in our lives. (Dr. Tibor Varga) According to the Holy Crown Doctrine, which is the written reality of a customary law, everyone deserves a life worthy of a human being. The goods required for this cannot be alienated, and cannot be transferred to private hands. Today, this would be the agricultural land, road network, drinking water supply, telephone, post office, railway... These are the properties of the Holy Crown, which cannot be alienated by either the king or the parliament. Although this system does not serve profit maximization, it gives an opportunity for a life worthy of a human being. (Dr. Tibor Varga)
Great video and study.Atilla 2 nd wife princes of Roma,Honoria give a birth to Atila son called CHABA.-CSABA today.and a Székely people in Transilvánia are a desendance of king Csaba.Kigg Csaba spend 19 years in Byzantine beside of his grandfather Honorius who was a emperor of Byzantine.After when his grandfather Honorius died, he and his Hun-magyar-avar.székely people went to king Atila father Murduk-Mundzuk.who was still in life around north part of Black sea..
All respect for the work! Good job! Really enjoyed the video❤. Tho.. in allmoast all documentarys about great kings and generals.. moast experts use the words "ilogical or improbabil or less likely or irational" but does anyone consider the ego( ego can be and for shure was the reason of many "ilogical actions") such a powerfull king into consideration? Sry for my english as is not my first language.
You are the only channel that establishes the connection between Xiongnu, Huns and Gokturks. Instead of explaining it biasedly like other western channels, you explained the connection with the Turks objectively. They are all the continuation of each other, Huns established a steppe federation and of course there would be Mongols and Persians. But the majority of the army and the administration are ethnically Turks. Do your research from objective sources instead of biased ones. Good job. Respect!
In ancient and medieval history sources, travelers and historians defined the Turkish peoples as Kipchaks, Cumans, Alans, Khazars, Hun - Bulgarians, Oghuz Turks, Yenisei Kyrgyz and White Huns as "Caucasoid" rather than Asian in phenotype Sources: Ammianus Marcelinus, Mattia De Edesse, Abul Feda Yosef, Biruni, Ibn Khaldun, Ibni Rabbihi, Istakhri, Said El Maghribi, Gerdizi, El Mesudi, El Omari, Nizami,, Chronicles of China Tang. Igor Epic.. Additionally, Proto Turks were never genetically mongoloid. Unlike Mongoloid DNA (c-o), They are belong to Caucausoid (r1,j2,g2,q) Haplogroups Characterictic Haplogroups in Proto-Turkic Groups Scythians- r1a-z93+q1a Huns- r1a-z93+q1a+j2a Gokturks - r1a-z93+j2a+q1a Uyghurs - r1a-z93+j2a Kipchaks- r1a-z93+r1b Cumans- r1a-z93+g2a Bulgarians- r1a-z93+q1a Alans- r1a-z93+g2a-p+j2a Khazars- r1a-z93+j2a+g2a Avars- r1a-z93+g2a+j2a Burcans- r1a-z93-g2a Proto-Kyrgyz- r1a-z93+j2 Oghuzs- r1b+r1a-z93+j2a Magyars- r1a+r1b+g2a Pechenegs- r1a+r1b+g2a Tatars- r1b+r1a+Q The Etruscan dynasty also belongs to the nomadic haplogroups r1b and r1a with the highest frequency. That's why Honorary Italian History Professor Mario Alinei described the Roman Etruscan dynasty as having Turkish origin. You can browse.
@@Nastya_07 Then why did Herodotus say that Persians and Scythians were different peoples? Why did Byzantine and European chroniclers throughout history refer to Turkish peoples such as Khazar, Ases, Cuman, Tatar, Pecheneg and Avar as Scythians? Why did they not mention any Persian people as Scythians? Why were the Turks mentioned with a Caucasoid phenotype like the Scythians in all written sources in history? Why do Scythians have the same genetics as many Turkish peoples and not with Persian peoples?
@@Sranuri Then why did Herodotus say that Persians and Scythians were different peoples? -Well, there were certainly diferences in culture, lifestyle and also language to some degree (Scythians spoke Eastern Iranian, Persians speak Western Iranian) Why did Byzantine and European chroniclers throughout history refer to Turkish peoples such as Khazar, Ases, Cuman, Tatar, Pecheneg and Avar as Scythians? -Byzantine sources call Hungarians Turks, even though Hungarians are Uralic. Why did they not mention any Persian people as Scythians? -Because they aren't (again, Scythians Eastern Iranian, Persians speak Western Iranian) Why were the Turks mentioned with a Caucasoid phenotype like the Scythians in all written sources in history? -Ossetians are Caucasoid too. Why do Scythians have the same genetics as many Turkish peoples and not with Persian peoples? -Because most Scythians got assimilated by the Turks. Brittanica -"Scythian, member of a nomadic people, originally of Iranian stock," Iranica -"SCYTHIANS, a nomadic people of Iranian origin who flourished in the steppe lands north of the Black Sea during the 7th-4th centuries BCE." Golden, Peter B. (2011). Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes page 21-22: -"We may set aside theories, now fashionable in some quarters, which attempt to link or identify various Iranian peoples of Antiquity with the Turkic-speaking world. Even further afield, peoples and civilizations encompassing much of Europe and even the New World have been declared Turkic. These theories have found little in the way of substantiation. More interesting, but perhaps equally a stretch are the attempts made by Denis Sinor, among others, to link Turk with the Ἱύρκαι of Herodotos (IV. 22)," page 24: -"If the “Tyrcae” are, indeed, the Türks, a major migration from the western Eurasian steppes to Inner Asia would be required for them to appear in the Chinese borderlands in the sixth century. Of this we have no record either in the Chinese historical tradition or in the Türk tradition. Moreover, while Indo-Europeans (Indo-Iranians and Tokharians) clearly moved eastward into Inner Asia, the movement of Inner Asian Altaic speakers (among whom the Turkic peoples are ranked), according to the historical record, has been from east to west."
@@Nastya_07 None of these are the correct answer. 1. "The more common view is the "Turcæ" tribe of the Scythians, which was also mentioned by Pliny and Mela and gave its name to today's Turkic geography (Turkestan)." (The Natural History. Pliny the Elder. John Bostock, M.D., F.R.S. H.T. Riley, Esq., B.A. London. Taylor and Francis, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street. / Chap.7) The Scythians, the ancestors of the Nomads, came from the Altai region BC in the 10-9 centuries to North Caucausia. Scythians are originally a Caucasoid race from Altai. There is no definitive opinion that the Scythians spoke Iranian language. This is still a theory. The fact that the characteristic haplogroups of Proto Turkic Peoples are R1a-z93 (Scythian) and R1b-m343(Sarmatian) instead of mongoloid (C1-m130) is proof of this. 2. You made it up. Byzantine and European chroniclers mention the Avars Bulgarians Khazars Ases and Cumans Turks living in the North Caucasus and Central Asia. not the Hungaria. "Byzantines encountered the Gokturks ,Khazar , Kipchaks and Pechenegs Turks. And their language, their clothing, and They found their culture so similar to the Scythians that they referred to them all as "Scythians". (Kaegi, W. E. (2003). Heraclius: Emperor of Byzantium (First Edition) Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 140-151.). 3. Also The interesting thing is that the genetics of Hungarians are similar to Cumans and are agglutinative like Turkish languages. for example hg: Jebemmen śok kiszik alma van. tr: cebimde çok küçük elma var. eng: There is a very small apple in my pocket 4. In addition, contrary to classical encyclopedia sites, archaeological, anthropological and genetic research on the Scythians indicates that there is no connection between the Scythians and the Ossetians. New genetic and linguistic studies connect the Scythians to the Turks. Also The genetic lineage of the Karachay and Balkar Turks is mostly the same as the Schytian-Alans. Karachay Turks Characterictic Haplogroups R1a-z93-z2123 36% + G2a1-p15-16 %34% Unfortunately, the Scythian Characteristic Haplogroup R1a-z2123 (%42) is 1-2% in Ossetians. www.familytreedna.com/groups/k-balkar-dna/about/background www.familytreedna.com/public/Ossetian/default.aspx?section=yresults 5. SCYTHIANS Scythians: A Turkic people speaking the Ancient Turkic language (Edward A. Bond, Russia At The Close Of The Sixteenth Century: Comprising, The Treatise "of The Russe Common Wealth” by Dr. Giles Fletcher; and The Travels of Sir Jerome Horsey, Hakluyt, s. 94.) Scythians: Ancestors of the Turkic Origin Huns and Fins Warrior nomads ( John Gent, The Scythie Nations, Down to the Fall of the Western Empire, Kessinger Publishing, s. 21, 45 - 46.) Scythians: Ancestors of Today's Kyrgyz Turks A confederation of nomadic Turkic people (Nathan Light, “History, experience and narration: novel accounts and multiplex stories”, History Making in Central and Northern Eurasia: ContemporaryActors and Practices, Jacquesson, Svetlana, Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig ReichertVerlag, 2016, s. 152. ) Scythians: Ancestors of the Kipchak Cuman Turks. Turkic-speaking nomads. (Leon Cahun, Introduction to Asian History: From Origins to 1405, Turks and Mongols 2006, p. 40.) R. Caldwell; Turanian languages or the Ural-Altaic language family, that is, the Scythian group and the Dravidian group, are related in terms of roots and structure. (CALDWELL, Robert, A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages p.29, London) Scythian language, is related to Dravid , Ugric and Turkic "Tatar, Bashkir, Kyrgyz" languages. (NEUMANN, Karl Johann Heinrich, Die Hellenen Im Skythenlande: Ein Beitray Zur Alten Geographic, Etnographic und Handelsgeschicte, Berlin p.139-154) Boris Zhivkov; The similarity between Scythian beliefs and Turkish mythology attracts attention. (ZHİVKOV, Boris, Khazaria in the Ninth and Tenth Centuries, Brill, 2015. p.112) "The Greeks now call the people known as Scythians "Tatars". (English Historian V. Mitford - History of Greeks From Books 1838, p.419) The fact that the Scythians are Turks does not need proof" (R.Latama, 1854, p.45 - Russian Geographical Bulletin) The first written Russian historians A.Lizlov and N.Tatishchiev also state that the Scythians were the ancestors of the Turkic tribes. The Turks, formerly called Scythians, sent peace ambassadors to Yustin" (Vizontiyskiye İstoriki, 1861, 376)
@@Nastya_07Hello, the assimilation of the Scythians is not an obstacle to the existence of the same habligroup in the DNA of today's Iranian people! If the Iranians are Scythians, they must carry Scythian DNA. But there isn't!
Kutrigurs (9 tribes), Utigurs (30 tribes), onogurs (10 tribes) are bulgar tribes who, after Attila's death, from the time of his son Ernak, are within and who now come to the fore of the Hun state/confederation. Hun is the political term that kept being used. Politically, they were still Hun at the time and components of the state/confederation. Според автора, който се споменава във видеото, Ким и неговата книга Хуните, тия българи тепърва идват от изток и влизат, като подчинени на Ернак, в останалата източна част от Хунското политическо тяло и го преобразяват. Ще цитирам тук някои части от книгата (тъкмо я чета), ако не е проблем.
From The Huns (Peoples of the Ancient World) by Hyun Jin Kim: "The task of salvaging what was left of the eastern half of the Hunnic Empire fell on Ernakh, the youngest of Attila’s sons." "[E]rnakh apparently became the founding ruler of the so-called ‘Bulgar’ Huns (that is according to the Bulgar Prince list), the confederation of Huns and the various Oghurs subdued by Ernakh. This unification was made easier it seems by the fact that the Huns themselves were largely an Oghuric Turkic speaking people. The Oghur tribes that flooded into the Ukraine and southern Russia to avoid Rouran (Avars?) and Sabir (Xianbei?) domination were in all likelihood formerly constituent members of the Hunnic confederacy/state (possibly that of the Yueban Huns) in Central Asia that had fragmented under Rouran pressure.
... The new Oghur arrivals, however, made a lasting impact on the nature of the Hunnic state that emerged in the late fifth century AD. As Golden astutely points out, the names of the two wings of this reconfigured Hunnic state: Kutrigur (9 Oghurs) Huns in the west and the Utigur (30 Oghurs) Huns in the east, both contain the element Oghur in their political designation. That these two wings were the constituent parts of the same Hunnic state and not originally separate political groups, is confirmed by the records in Procopius and Menander that they had the same Hunnic origin. The foundation legend of these two wings is told by Procopius, who states that before the formation of both entities power in the steppe was concentrated in the hands of a single ruler (undoubtedly Ernakh, son of Attila). This ruler then divided the power/empire between his two sons called Utigur and Kutrigur (probably representative titles given to the two princes who headed these confederations or eponymous names later attributed to them). The peoples allocated to the two sons were then called Utigurs and Kutrigurs, with the Utigurs clearly possessing precedence in the typical Inner Asian manner, being mentioned first and occupying the senior position to the east of the confederacy/state, (Procopius 8. 5.1-4). This story in Procopius is clearly an allusion to real historical processes, which took place in the late fifth century AD when Ernakh reunited the Pontic steppe and then in the usual Inner Asian manner divided his realm into two wings. Procopius goes on to locate the Utigurs in the Kuban steppe (southwestern Russia) and the Kutrigurs in ‘the greater part of the plains’ west of the Sea of Azov, i.e. southern Ukraine (8.5.22-3)."
"[T]hese two wings and another related group the Onogurs were also called Bulgars in our sources, indicating that ‘Bulgar’ was either an alternative name for these Huns or their new ethnic self-designation in addition to the political name ‘Hun’. Henceforth they were known collectively as Bulgar Huns. The terms Utigur, Kutrigur and Onogur were not ethnic designations, but terms signifying the socio-military organization of steppe peoples, 30, 9 and 10 oghurs (tribes/units)."
Attila defeated both Eastern and Western Roman empire. In 452 , the Western Roman empire became a vassal state, which supported by Priscus and Prosper of Aquitane ,who were both contemporaries.
Indeed they are, with my own input. But it's difficult to create images in which neither the men nor women look like "models", hence their look in this video. In the newer videos, the characters look somewhat more normal.
Thank you for the video. You have amazingly accurately reproduced the appearance of the Huns. I am simply amazed at how accurately artificial intelligence reproduced the images of the Huns (Xiongnu). This is simply excellent. I just began to believe even more that our Chuvash ancestors were Xiongnu. I have photographs of my relatives and they are 100 percent similar to your photographs of the Huns. It is something. I'm just touched. It was as if I saw my distant relatives. The Chuvash are descendants of the Xiongnu. That's for sure. Both in language and now in appearance... I'm sure. It was they who invisibly drew your portraits of the Huns. We Chuvash even have a clan called Mushchak (Attila’s father), I found out last week. Your hand and thoughts are invisibly led in the right direction by our great ancestors - the Xiongnu. In Chuvash, man is translated as Shun. Tavtapushch sir (in Chuvash this means thank you) We have an ancient saying that if the Chuvash disappear, the world will disappear. The Huns, represented by the Chuvash, have not left the world stage of history. They, as before, will still say their word for the glory of humanity.... Tour Shchirlakh!!!
My Hungarian ex-girlfriend was One of the most perfect creatures that ever lived, emitting a glory that would blind any mortal man. I find no fault with the engineering judgement of the man she married after dropping me.
The history of the Gaoju is given in the respective entry in WS 103 + (pp. 2505-2508); until the beginning of Text 1.056/B it is extracted as follows. 高車,蓋古赤狄之餘種也初號為狄歷,北方以為敕勒,諸夏以為高車、丁零。 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異,或云其先匈奴之也。 The Gaoju are probably the remaining tribes of the ancient Chidi [lit. 'the red Di']. Initially they were called Dili. People in the north called them Chile, whereas people in China proper called them Gaoju or Dingling. Their language is roughly the same as that of the Xiongnu but at times has minor differences from that. Some say that their ancestors were the nephew of [i.e. indirectly related to] the Xiongnu.
I have heard and been told that there are some villages in Germany that bear a Hunnic appearance and other traits. The same also applies to a couple of villages in France. I have also read that Ottavakar(Odoacer) did not want to destroy the Roman Empire but to perpetuate it e.g.the Roman Church, the Holy Roman Empire and the modern day EU. During WW 2 the Germans were sometimes called The Huns.
Page 441 To judge by the tribal names, a great part of the Huns must have spoken a Turkish language. Ultincur and Alpilcur are as Turkish as Bug-cor, the Pecheneg tribal names ending in t£ovq, and the Kirghiz tribal and clan names ending in coro. Another common ending in Turkish tribal names, -gur, occurs in Kutrigur, Utigur, Onogur, Bittugur, *Tongur, and *Ugur. On the analogy with Ultincur, Ultingir, ending in -gir like other definitely Turkish ethnic names, must likewise be Turkish. The same is true for Bardor = Var-dor and Ultindur. Page 72 The Hunnic noblemen, Attila's relatives and retainers, have either Turkish or Germanic names. There evidently were few, if any, Alans among the leading group. As no people ever emigrated to the last man, some Alans presumably stayed in Hungary after 406, but they played a minor role. Most of their tribal and clan leaders had left. Page 403 That the Huns included Turkish-speaking tribes can be regarded as established only if a number of personal and tribal names of the Huns are undoubtedly as Turkish as orfevre is French, goldsmith English, and Goldschmied German. One such name is *alp-il-cur.
Great video guys. Production, informational content and the narration (both speed and voice pitch) were all top level. Thoroughly enjoyed, many thanks 🙏
7:25= Kucha = the place where was the first time domestise wolf & other wild dog types . They named the place for all humanity = Kutya , still call the dogs in hungarian ( magyar ) language . There is a other proof place , where the wild horses was first domesticated by our race , the place name is : ló ... in turania - altaj [ al táj of the montains ] home of our races during the iceage in europe , then moving back to central europe , where they was lived before iceage . Etc...
I thought _kara_ (black) was associated with prestige and honor, hence so many people and places named with it, i.e. Karakalpak, Karakorum, Ankara, Karamanid, Kara Osman, etc.
Great video again my friend thank you for telling the story of our ancestors in a non-demonizing way, growing up in the west the Huns are the bad guys but truly they were the tools of God
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب Right. There's an endless list of enemies anyways of Hungarians since forever. No surprise. And if the dark middle age never ends, I don't even care anyways. Enjoy the Psycho Pire, that's all what you got.
There is no direct relation between the Germanic runes and that Turkish ones. Runes are just the ancient form that letters had, preferring straight lines as you can see in Archaic Greek and Etruscan inscriptions, before classical letters came into being. It was much easier to carve straight lines into wood than curved ones and it still is. The Germanic runes are directly connected to the Greek and Roman letters, you can actually still read them by knowing the Latin alphabet, some Germanic language (such as English) and a little exercise. Turkish runes are a very distant relative, therefore they have not been deciphered till quite recently.
@@amosnaftali2495 Well not for the writing system, because Germanic people had their rune alphabet since the 1st c. AD at least and the Huns came only at the end of the 4th c. into Europe. Huns had an influence by their political system and warfare most probably, but not on writing. There are by the way no remains of Hun writing so we don't know if they had any. The 24 letters of the Germanic rune alphabet are very very similar to the Roman and Greek ones, you can read it yourself sometimes without any knowledge of runes! whereas the Turks got their alphabet by contact with Central Asiatic cultures.
@@amosnaftali2495 don't know about that. Huns are difficult to identify in their homelands already, so it wouldn't be very easy to identify them in Syria. Or do you mean Hunnic for Turcic, because the Goktürks did have a runic system from the 8th century? As I said for the Germanic runes, there was zero Hunnic influence as we have them unchanged from before and after the Hunnic period. It is in the late 8th century that Germanic runes change into the Viking runes, which is mainly a simplification of the system, probably due to changes in the language.
You said Pashtoon in Afghanistan but it is originally Hazaras. Hazaras are the Turkes whom still has 60 to 90 percent central Asian gens according to genetic tests. Hazaras ancestors was created Koshanian Empire.
Those of you who are interested in the relationship of the Huns and the Hungarians, refer to recent DNA findings by Hungarian Scientist, who conducted extensive DNA studies of Hun skeletons in Hunnic cemeteries in Mongolia. The DNA findings directly identify the Huns and the Hungarians being of the same race.
@@hunguy3280 No and Genetics, Culture, food or nourishment and weaponry shows that they are a Turkic group of people, litterally every source will say that.
I'm tired of always hearing the same thing which is not actually true , Hungarians Are Huns no friend they are not, they just speak old Bulgarian which is actually a Turkic language (Chuvash language Bulgarian language Tatar language, Chuvash and old Bulgarian are direct descendants of the Huns language) , and settled where the Huns had previously been , don't confuse Huns with Magyars :-) You Hungarians have a huge history in the Medieval ages , and especially the wars with the Ottomans , and in later times the Austro-Hungarian Empire - but just stop claiming everywhere that Hungarians are Huns
The Huns were a diverse coalition of Eurasian nomads but their rulers were Turkic-Mongolic peoples who also themselves are also admixed Eurasian peoples
@KhansDen There might be a better explanation. Let's say that this is right, which quite possibly has a reason. Then who really, really are the Huns? Another unknown? And how suddenly they had the whole East Europe? How come so easy everybody aligned with them? Maybe it has something to do with another magic that nobody wants or is uncomfortable to tackle the disappearance of the so-called Sarmats. And maybe there is another name that we missed, the Masagets. O, no, they also disappeared. But wait, they CAME BACK to Europe just when Huns showed up? Chronology certainly mach. This "nonsense" does not fit the Slavic and Tyurkic and Mongol or Iranian narratives but maybe explains some archeological findings. The Enigma of Europeans in Central Asia. The puzzling subject that everyone avoids, especially after the Second World War, so it won't be blamed? Lots of professional historians in comfortable positions won't tackle discrepansies but would rather repeat old dogmas. Maybe, just maybe, Gettae and Moesians, for which has a lot of mentioning in the old authors, are the missing link? The one that does not exactly fit most narratives and is systematically "overlooked." So, if Sarmats are the Moeso-Getti (Tracians who settled in much earlier times) and also it has been written "Sarmats are the Asian Schythians", than puzzle is getting in place There is a lot of "missed" or intentionally overlooked evidence for that. But until this is accepted, it might take time. Truth, based on facts and logic, will overcome.💪
3:07= Modu Chanyu = MAG CSÁNY , chanyu ( today : csány , all over in europe in old laguages ) . Tengri = tengeri , kut : kút(fő) tanyu -> tanya = the overall territory of them . Etc...
Just did! You can check them out on my Artstation profile, here's the link: www.artstation.com/a/30441503 It's a way to keep this channel running and covering all the costs. However, I also share images for free from time to time on the community tab.
This can be surmised by analysing the names of Hunnic princes and tribes. The names of the following Hunnic princes are clearly Oghuric Turkic in origin: Mundzuk (Attila's father, from Turkic Munc uq = pearl/jewel: for an in-depth discussion of the Hunnic origin of this name in particular see Schramm (1969), 139-40), Oktar/Uptar (Attila's uncle, Öktär brave/powerful), Oebarsius (another of Attila's paternal uncles, Arbårs leopard of the moon), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qarâton = black-cloak), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bársig = governor), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig, meaning brave or noble, or Quršiq meaning belt-bearer). For these etymologies see Bona (1991), 33. Three of Attila's known sons. have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila's principal wife, the mother of the crown prince' Ellac, has the Turkic name Herekan, as does another notable wife named Eskam. See Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 392-415. See also Bona (1991), 33-5, and Pritsak (1956), 414. Most known Hunnic tribal names are also Turkic, Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 427-41, e.g. Ultincur, Akatir etc. The cur suffix in many of these names is a well-known Turkic title and as Beckwith (1987), 209, points out the To-lu or Tardus tribes (Hunnic in origin) of the Western Turkish On Oq were each headed by a Cur (noble). Zieme (2006), 115, speculates that the title cur belongs to a pre-Turkic Tocharian stratum of the Turkic language, which, if true, again highlights the essential heterogeneity of Central Asian peoples and even languages. See also Aalto (1971), 35. In addition to this primary language (Oghuric Turkic), Priscus informs us that Latin and Gothic were also understood by the Hunnic elite. See Priscus, fr. 13.3, Blockley (1983), 289. The name of Ellac, Attila’s eldest son, is a corruption of the Turkic älik ( ilik ) meaning ‘ruler, king’. 21 Ernak/Irnik the youngest son also has the variation of the same suffix in his name. His name is probably Turkic är-näk , meaning ‘great hero’, with the suffix here functioning as an augmentation of the Turkic är-än (hero). 22 Thus the suffix -ik/ich was used in Hunnic to imply greatness (i.e. ruler or kingship). These names were, it seems, formal court titles rather than personal names. Kim, H. (2013). The end of the Hunnic Empire in the west. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 89-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Naturally we also have more probable Turkic etymologies for these names, especially for those of Attila and Bleda. However, even if they were Germanic or Germanicized Turkic names," ,99 this does not allow us to make any hasty assumptions about the official language of the empire, if it ever existed. What Heather ignores is the fact that we have convincing or highly probable Turkic etymologies for the names of many of the other Hunnic kings and nobles before and after Attila, e.g. Mundzuk (Attila's father, from Turkic Muncuq = 'pearl/jewel'), Oktar/Uptar (Attila's uncle, Öktär = "brave/power ful'), Oebarsius (another of Attila's paternal uncles, Aïbârs = 'leopard of the moon'), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qaraton = 'black cloak'), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bårsig= 'governor'), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig, meaning 'brave or noble', or Qursiq meaning 'belt-bearer'). All three of Attila's known sons have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila's principal wife, the mother of the first son Ellac, has the Turkic name Herekan, as does another wife named Eskam (Ešqam = 'companion of the Shaman).102 It seems highly likely then from the names that we do know, most of which seem to be Turkic, that the Hunnic elite was predominantly Turkic speaking. However, in the western half of the empire, where most of their subjects spoke Germanic languages, the Huns may have used both Hunnic (Oghuric Turkic) and Gothic. Thus fief holders and royal family mem Ibers in the west who ruled Germanic tribes often bore Germanic or Germanicized titles (of great significance, as we will discover later on in the book), e.g. Laudaricus and Ardaric.105 Priscus, who is our only reliable source, being an actual eye-witness, tells us that at the Hunnic court Hunnic, Gothic and Latin were spoken, but with Hunnic always men tioned before Gothic. All three languages were apparently understood by the elite to some degree, so much so that Zercon the Moor could provoke laughter by jumbling all three together at a Hunnic banquet in the presence of Attila.107 There is, however, no indication anywhere that any of these three languages was the lingua franca. Kim, H. (2013). Notes. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haussig (2000), 277, suggests that Oult or Oulti is a Greek rendering of the Oghuric Turkic word for the number six. What is interesting is the fact that in names such as Oultizouroi and Ultzincur above we have clearly two elements Oulti (six) + the Turkic title Cur (noble), meaning ‘the six lords’. Kim, H. (2013). Notes. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 159-275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The core Turkic tribes of the Hunnic Empire from very early on all possessed different names: Akatziri , Alpidzuri, etc. in addition to their Hunnic identity. Kim, H. (2013). Introduction. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sogdian sources mention that the Turks are closely related to the Huns. Also, Indian sources mentioned that the Turks are related to the Huns. And the Byzantine sources confirmed that the Bulgarians are the same as the Huns, and the Bulgarian kings confirmed in their sources and inscriptions that they were descended from the lineage of the Hun kings.
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
Did the Mongols establish Turks? Where did you learn history?? In addition, the Xiongnu people fled from western China, and today's Shanxi is the birthplace of the Xiongnu.
This took a long time and a lot of effort to make. Hope you enjoy.
And in case you want some of the images used in this video digitally, go to my profile on ArtStation. There, you can purchase a 9-image pack of images that show the lifestyle, religion, warfare and people of the Huns in Europe.
---> www.artstation.com/a/30441503
The portrait of Attila, the last great king of the Huns and the most infamous of them all, that is also shown on the thumbnail is further available as PRINT (poster, canvas etc.):
---> artstn.co/pp/ap/10zbX
With each purchase you will support this channel, and every dime is going to be invested into the next projects. Thank you.
❤ u rule
Absolutely. Great work!
You are the greatest youtuber ever! I really very appreciate your unique talent on history telling. I hope always best for you...
I've heard that the Huns introduced the stir-ups to the Ancient European. It was supposed to be the reason that the Huns were able to have an edge over the Romans
@@kolfibrown6540 - Very arguable: the stirrup debate is endless, the most clear evidence seems to lead to the Avars but it may have existed earlier in Europe, nobody knows for sure, as the earliest stirrups would have just been made of perishable materials. Also it's not clear that the stirrup was such an advantage relative to Roman saddles, which were very secure. It seems that early stirrups were mer aids for less fit people to climb to the horse and may have only been placed on one side. The Hunnic advantage was surely bow and arrow, which requires intense training, rather than a relatively passive element like the stirrup... but all may help.
I absolutely love your channel. Please keep doing more and more turkic, mongolic movies please. You're exactly who I've been searching for!!!!!!!!!
It would be cool to make videos about the Mongols next. We'll see. Thank you for your kind words!
@@KhansDen Attila was the ancestor of Mongols and round face asian people but he was very very clever man he gathered all the armies of Asia and came to europe because he promised them gold, he also destroyed many places who did not want to join in and that is why people are confused but in reality he was just a round face ASIAN man...where the white huns lived in southren afghnistan all the way to china in the desert area...
By far the most accurate and reliable video about the Huns! Thank you !
Been waiting for this for so long. Love from Scotland🏴🇬🇧
🏴🇺🇲
How often do you shave your *SKRÖPPEL* a year? 😭
İskoçyalılar, Türktür
İskoç,İskit,Saka,Osaka. Türk adlarının iskoçyadan , japonyanın osaka adasına kadar olan isim serüveni böyledir
Thanks!
One of the best I've seen. Congratulations
Absolutely excellent doco! Really fascinating & educational. Great work, team. Thank you so much for sharing. ⚔🙏
According the Hungarian chronicles, Attila and his troops stayed on the battle field and buried the dead enemy, and burned their own dead soldiers. After this they stopped in Rome. Pope Leo came to the gates of Rome. A short time later Attila and his troop left. So the so called barbarian didn't burn Rome like the Germans and others did before and after.
Hungayrian ancestral 😂.ongaria mongolia
@@weekendoffender44I don't see anything wrong to be Mongolian.The Mongolian's are great people ancestors of great Genghis Khan.
@weekendoffender44 let me guess ... your Romanian.
@@accaeffe8032 There were seven Magyar tribes, but other elements were part of the federation, including three tribes of Turkic Khazars (the Kavars). Either because of this fact or perhaps because of a memory of earlier conditions, this federation was known to its neighbours as the On-Ogur (literally “Ten Arrows” or “Ten Tribes”).
@@weekendoffender44 < but that was one of the seven tribes , the onugors - on ugors . But like that , was over 107-110 on ugors tribe .of Attila , the avars just added they tribes and the magyars added , knows seven main tribes + they slaves [ slaves ] . So , just like any other main tribes , inside was many branches of tribes . The " sakas = székes -> székelys ! " .
One interesting data about the "barbaric" Attila:
In 476 the Roman empire was ended, when the last emperor, Augustus Romulus was dethroned by Odoaker, and Odoaker became the king of Italy. And who were they? Augustus Romulus was the son of the first secretary of Attila (Orestes). And Odoaker was a son of the commander of Attila's bodyguard (Edeko).
So how "barbarian" Attila could be, if his first secretary's son became later the last Roman emperor, and his bodyguard's commander's son became later the first Italian king?
Because never ending butthurt of europeans. They never come peave with the reailty of dominated by nomads of asia. Its just big black hole of their record. Last over a millenia.
Europian propaganda
@@resadbehramov4130 < cáfold meg ! -> Proved , that was not truth !
@@resadbehramov4130😂😂😂 You are very dumb to say this. Obviously. It is obvious because the European propaganda, you try to speak about, was always against Hungarians. So you could never hear about these details mentioned anywhere untill now. These details I highly doubt that you will ever hear from Western European sources. European propaganda 😂😂😂 For who? You? 😂 Your comment is a killer 😂 of reason, and reality both.
I most enjoy the research and references used in this fantastic work. Great scholarship
This is by far the best and most informative documentary about this topic I have seen. Delicious style and magnifitient illustrations. Gettin better and better. Enjoyed alot. Please more.🐎🐎🐎
It was an informative and wonderful explanation of Huns history. and their's relationships to Turkik tribe's..Huns influences in India, Persians, east and west Rome empires....thank you for sharing
Yes i was wondering about the history in India as well
@user-mm7zi4ue7d
...ueee
@user-mm7zi4ue7du r a baised person
Top notch. Thanks for creating and sharing with the world.
Thank you for the video. You have amazingly accurately reproduced the appearance of the Huns. I am simply amazed at how accurately artificial intelligence reproduced the images of the Huns (Xiongnu). This is simply excellent. I just began to believe even more that our Chuvash ancestors were Xiongnu. I have photographs of my relatives and they are 100 percent similar to your photographs of the Huns. It is something. I'm just touched. It was as if I saw my distant relatives. The Chuvash are descendants of the Xiongnu. That's for sure. Both in language and now in appearance... I'm sure. It was they who invisibly drew your portraits of the Huns. We Chuvash even have a clan called Mushchak (Attila’s father), I found out last week. Your hand and thoughts are invisibly led in the right direction by our great ancestors - the Xiongnu. In Chuvash, man is translated as Shun. Tavtapushch sir (in Chuvash this means thank you) We have an ancient saying that if the Chuvash disappear, the world will disappear. The Huns, represented by the Chuvash, have not left the world stage of history. They, as before, will still say their word for the glory of humanity.... Tour Shchirlakh!!!
Gyere Magyarországra! OTTHON fogod érezni magadat.Mi magyarok HUNOK vagyunk.
Khan's Den it's another level, awesome! It's clear if we look Turkic countries general history only their founders gain their top. Land area, army, supplies extra. Like Atilla the hun, The Temur, mamluk sultans acros afro-asia except ottomans
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
Yes, however the the staple of he Ottoman military was a well oiled disciplined light infantry, not mounted archers.
Ottomans did not used mounted archers.
Seljuk Turks did, but not the Ottomans.
The Ottomans often paired up with the Tartars who did use mounted archers, but not always.
It was not always impossible to beat horse archers though. China with extensive history of fighting nomads, realized they can simply get lots of shield and lots of crossbows. They've had crossbows way before Europe had and they were able to field large armies of crossbowmen and this countered the nomads easily. The crusaders in middle east did the same tactic by using lots of crossbows and just volley firing into horse formations who had no armor to protect against crossbows.
WHAT WAS HARD however, was that the nomads were extremely mobile and they can quickly move from one location to another without having to worry about supply chains being stretched. When the Chinese chased the Xiongnu armies deep into their territories, the Chinese armies eventually stretched themselves too thin and their flanks got harassed slowly. Chinese armies would win battles but it wasn't enough to be decisive until the Chinese themselves adopted horse archery to counter back and chase after them.
@@danwelterweight4137 they did until 1500
@@danwelterweight4137 Ottomans are a Turkized Middle Eastern population - Arabs, Kurds, Armenians, Greeks, etc. Far from the Turks.
@@mr.purple1779tell em brother. These people from Turkey are delusional af. They share no genetic resemblance to old turkic people. They were just under them and adapted their culture and language. They were colonized persian people not turkic people.
Really loved your video. You research is impeccable, storytelling is great and illustrations as superb
Really engaging. Thanks for your wonderful efforts
My pleasure!
@@KhansDenplease do on the huns and steppe people in india and how are they now
THE SON OF ATTILA Following the assassination of Attila , the great Hun warrior , the German tribes rose up in rebellion . Many bloody battles ensued , as Teutons battled Huns . In the Carpathian Mountains , the outnum bered Huns were forced to seek reinforcements . Alone , with only a small group of warriors , Csaba , the youngest son of Attila and leader of the Székely tribe , left the scene . He took a group of his greatest warriors and body guards , and fought his way out of the enemy encirclement . He then rode east to raise another army and return to their settled homeland . He made good on his promise , more than once . As time passed , legends grew up around the returning chief and his Hun warriors . Today , over campfires , as the legends are recounted , children look up to the starry milky way and see its river of stars , the Hadak útja ( Warriors Avenue ) , and know that Attila and their ancient ancestors will return with their mighty armies of courageous warriors from the stars , to protect their homeland , and the Carpathians , the heart of the empire of the Huns .
Dante Mena.Hunter Publishing.Adventure Guide to Cuba.p.47
Yes, I am Szekely and our tradition holds that we are the descendants of Attila’s son, Csaba.
He wasn't assasinated. That story is the kind of thing for a fancifull bbc drama. The facts point pretty u equivocally to a natural death.
That was really nice! Thanks!
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin.
All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) :
Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars
Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin :
Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can
Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär
Althias = six; from Turkic Alti
Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač
Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam
Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq
Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık
Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ
Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä
Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa
Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake
Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat
Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü
Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä
Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur
Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam
Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan
Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk
Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är
Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ
Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton
Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq
Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči
Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq
Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars
Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun
Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär
Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä
Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun
Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti
Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
My friend.
Do you have know where is good comtent of portuguese ottoman wars?
@@rvrv7021kings and generals did a documentary about this. Check out.
@@rvrv7021 OTTOMAN AGAİNST PORTUGESE NAVY İN İNDİA BATTLE OF DİU.
Chill, Turks didn't exist at that time.
Hun Empire, Xianbei Empire, Rouran Empire, GokTurkic Empire, Uyghur Empire, Kyrgyz Khanate, Khitan Empire, Tatar-Mongol Empire. All these empires founded in the same place. Which nation would you like to call Turkic ? Why so many fake Turkic nations.
My name is Atila and i feel so grateful my parents named me after him
Not a name
Attila ( little father )
@@Altaykaan1
....At'tila....At what language is please
@@lela8405 Hunnic or Turkic
@@Altaykaan1
....At...
At
At
....is languages huns ooor
turks...o my lord,am soo lon......
It's evident that Hunnic was an Oghur Turkic language related to Bulgar hence the concept of "Hunno-Bulgar", the Chuvash language remains the only surviving member of this archaic branch
The huns were the common ancestor of both the Turks and the Mongols.
The huns were not Turks, they were the ancestors of Turks. Big difference.
@@theanglo-lithuanian1768 Lol
wrong
Bulgars or Bolghars were probably one of the main offshoots of the Western Huns (Attila's) but there were others. They speak Turkic to this very day (Chuvash), although their Danubian relatives were Slavized from below, illustrating probably which was one of the features of Hunnic expansion: silent Slavic expansion as their vassals.
@@LuisAldamiz correct, Slavic settlement in much of the Balkans is mostly attributed to the activities of Oghuric entities like Bulgars & Avars, the depopulation of the region at the hands of the Huns also eased the whole process
This can be surmised by analysing the names of Hunnic princes and tribes. The names of the following Hunnic princes are clearly Oghuric Turkic in origin: Mundzuk (Attila’s father, from Turkic Muncˇuq = pearl/jewel; for an in-depth discussion of the Hunnic origin of this name in particular see Schramm (1969), 139-40), Oktar/Uptar (Attila’s uncle, Öktär = brave/powerful), Oebarsius (another of Attila’s paternal uncles, Aïbârs = leopard of the moon), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qarâton = black-cloak), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bârsig˘ = governor), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig˘ , meaning brave or noble, or Quršiq meaning beltbearer). For these etymologies see Bona (1991), 33. Three of Attila’s known sons 40 have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila’s princi pal wife, the mother of the ‘crown prince’ Ellac, has the Turkic name Here kan, as does another notable wife named Eskam. See Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 392-415. See also Bona (1991), 33-5, and Pritsak (1956), 414. Most known Hunnic tribal names are also Turkic, Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 427-41, e.g. Ultincur, Akatir etc. The cur suffix in many of these names is a well-known Turkic title and as Beckwith (1987), 209, points out the To-lu or Tardus tribes (Hunnic in origin) of the Western Turkish On Oq were each headed by a Cur (noble). Zieme (2006), 115, speculates that the title cur belongs to a pre-Turkic Tocharian stratum of the Turkic language, which, if true, again highlights the essential heterogeneity of Central Asian peoples and even languages. See also Aalto (1971), 35. In addition to this primary language (Oghuric Turkic), Priscus informs us that Latin and Gothic were also understood by the Hunnic elite. See Priscus, fr. 13.3, Blockley (1983), 289.
Mclaughlin, Professors Hyun & Lieu, Rome and China: Points of Contact (Routledge, 2021)
Eskam was the name of Attila's father in law not the wife itself :) there's also one more son of Attila to bear a Turkic name, "Atakam"
@@nenenindonuthats my name
Hell yeah.
Very nice documentary! In Hungary there are also some archaeological remains of the Huns such as gilded bows and Hunnic cauldrons. The name of the town of Buda comes from Attila's brother according to medieval chroniclers and a nice epic story rivalising with King Arthur's. Actually this is one of the many speculations of medieval historians recreating their past from placenames, because the name Buda comes from "oven" in Slavic and that is the meaning of the name used in medieval German also for Buda: "Ofen" (much like "oven" in English), the town being mostly inhabited by Germans in the Middle Ages, and probably founded on Slavic grounds like many other places in Hungary (example: Visegrad, meaning High Castle in Slavic). There was a strong medieval tradition of connecting the Magyars to the Huns, mainly by monks writing in their monasteries and making simplified etymological guesses as they were accustomed to in those times, guided by Isidore of Seville's Etymologicae. In the same sense, medieval French said they descended from Troy, because of prince Paris... But beyond the medieval storytellers about the Huns and Attila, we did actually have many relations with Turkish tribes and have a lot of Turcick loanwords in the Hungarian language (but also many Iranian ones and even more Slavic and German). The relation between the eastern Ural where magyars come from and the Altai is a very old one as they were directly connected by the Irtysh and the Ob rivers and these relations can alreaady be demonstrated in the Bronze Age, so there are also genetic links between Magyars and Turks going back to Prehistory and also from historical times as many Turcick tribes were actually integrated into the Hungarian kingdom, not the least the Petchenegs and the Koumans (Kipchaks).
The exonym Hungary also derives from a Hunnic sub-clan, the Onogurs, who together with the Kabars were a founding component of the Hungarian nation taking part in the Arpad led Magyar conquest of the Pannonian Basin
@@nenenindonu I doubt there's evidence the "Onogurs" were part of the Magyars. If you have some, please present it.
@@maximus3160 Moreover, it is suggested that Hungarian conquerers together with the Turkic-speaking Kabars moved in and integrated the “Avar” (including Onoghurs, Proto-Hungarians etc.) people.
Wang, Chuan-Chao; Posth, Cosimo; Furtwängler, Anja; Sümegi, Katalin; Bánfai, Zsolt; Kásler, Miklós; Krause, Johannes; Melegh, Béla (28 September 2021)"Genome-wide autosomal, mtDNA, and Y chromosome analysis of King Bela III of the Hungarian Arpad dynasty"
@Protagorasz well I didn't make it up, it is the opinion of historians and linguists in Hungary for at least a century and a half, when historical criticism and scholarship developed in Hungary as in Western Europe at about the same time. Why does this upset you? The brother of Attila is what medieval chroniclers wrote and they are notoriously bad historians and linguists: not seeing much difference between Arthurian legend, Bible and history.
@Protagorasz Please note also that Buda was not the capital of the kingdom of Hungary, it was Fehérvár. Buda became the seat of the Hungarian king soon after the mongol invasion in 1242 -the legend of Buda being Attila's city appeared precisely at that time, as well as the integration of French origin legends from Troy, like the name Sicambria for Buda, due to close relations with the French - Béla IV descended partly from the Capetian kings. Buda appears as "Offen" in German maps of Hungary as late as the 18th century. I don't know if these refered to potters' ovens, metallurgy or something else... but as your pseudo seems to indicate you are Hungarian you can easily check yourself in historical books on Budapest or on medieval Hungary.
Atilla horse name is Chagylgan which means in our Kyrgyz language Lightning ⚡️. And this word belong only to Kyrgyz, and to Saha Yakut 🧐
That's because the Huns were central Asians with culture similar to kyrgyz.
Thank you so awesome
You are welcome! More to come.
22:06 Bleda’s name inspired Buda to be the name of the western part of the capital city called Budapest (Hungária)
Bleda > Bilge (Turkish)
Hungarians don't do Horse Archery so your explanation is flawed 😂😂😂
How different were the Huns from the Mongols? Especially in terms of military technology. Did the Huns use stirrups? Also did the Mongols had better horses than the Huns because of 800+ years of selective breeding and improvement?
at that time,mongol's ancestor donghu and xiongnu was enemy to each other.
@@lingli5099 😂 even brothers were enemies at that time no problem
Mongols were more advanced, evidently, because they came later and built their organization on the system Scythians and Huns built before them. Huns used straight swords and asymmetrical bows, Mongols used curved swords and symmetrical bows. For the military unit consisting 10 000 men ancient Hungarians used the word "tömény", and the Mongols used the same, "tuemen". I bet they used the same small but sturdy Asian horses.
The same ppl. Just different times, hence more developed military
Huns-European name (Xiongnu-Chinese name) Hunnu(Хүннү)- Mongolian name. Both are same people and ancestors of Mongols
Exceptional material and excellent presentation!👍👏
29:39 Also haben sich die Hunnen-Germanen-Römer mit Römer-Germanen-Hunnen gefetzt wie wahre Cousins HAHAHAHHA aber realtalk spannende sicht du hast mehr abos verdient
This was an excellent "lecture".
Awesome channel, new sub! I have one of those last names that's hard to say and somewhat ornate in origin. I usually encourage them to try to pronounce it and guess where it's from as roll call at school and in sports was always akward growing up. My great grandfather escaped Hungary at the start of WW1 and ended up in Trenton NJ. I love all of this stuff!
We are all ATTİLA, we are all TÜRKS 🤘💯🤘
Many thanks for posting this Documentery!! Respect!
Thanks for an objective documentary well done will review remainder of playlists
Thanks Man.
Would you prepare a video on Huns of India, does any ethnic community in India stand for heir to Hunnic People?
No, but the Hünzaküt people of Pakistan have some Turko Mongolic DNA, albeit from various peoples, not only the Huns.
You're planning a video about the Magyar khanate, If no take the suggestion. I wan to know about the beginning and the role of the western realms in the consolidation of the Magyar realms in Hungarian lands.
Of course. The Magyars, but also Bulgars and others will be explored fully at a later time.
Same nation.
Under different names.
Avars,Huns,Magyars,....
We are Europe most accient nation.
J😊
I read elsewhere a comment that says xiongnu is pronouned as hiongnu in southern china as h becomes x in mandarin ( northern china).
Yes, Xiongnu is a Chinese corruption of the original Hiung-nu > Hunnu, which is obviously a rendering of the ultimate word "Hun"
Xiongnu, or Hsiongnu, wherein the s is very weak and almost silent.
Wonderful documentary, great job! You have a shining talent about history telling. Wonderful explanations about hunnic subempires like blue, red, white, golden huns. Blue huns were Gokturks in east, white and red huns were Hephtalites, Alchons in south, golden huns were Atilla's huns in northwest related to turkic region. Even today we can see turkic language region in language maps as reference.
I think Xiongnu was an eastern hun + mongol tribes union in east. On the west, there was a western hun (saka, sumer) + iranic union named Saka/Scythian. Their ancestors were turkic, ugric, sumerian people who have mixed with persian and arian people of mesopotamia and caucasia. Saka people are called in I. Darius' writing as foreign, central asian people. They were elder allies, later enemies for persians.
Sumerians have migrated to balkans, central europe partly mixing with grecoromans in anatolia and italian peninsula. They named themselves as Rasenna (Etruscans). They had a turkic-like culture and agglutinative language. Also, they spread to west as vasconic (basq, aquitan as also mentioned in this video) and to north as saxonian. Vasconic people also have spoken agglutinative in west, but saxonians have converted to germanic languages by gothic, nordic tribes.
If we inspect linguistically, in recent linguistic theories sumerian, vasconic, tyrrhenian, north caucasian (including avar andic), nadene/atabasq, yeniseian languages are classified in a new language family named dene-caucasian language family which is mostly agglutinative and relative to uralic-altaic languages. They all have originated from southeast asian agglutinative languages.
If we inspect genetically, southeast asians had C1b, D, K2b ydna genetics and spread to australia, polynesia, west and east austronesia, southern east asia, northern east asia, north euroasia, siberia, americas, central asia, east euroasia, west euroasia, india and west europe. They have spoken agglutinative languages mostly and had genetically mutated descendant haplogroups of C1b, D, K2b ydna.
I can summarize them as general:
C1b, C2 - east austronesian, polynesian,
C3 - mongolic, tungusic,
C4 - aboriginal australian,
D, D1, D2 - tibetan, burman, andamanese,
D3 - ainu, jomon japanese,
K2b, P - aeta, negrito, philippinese, malaisian,
M, S - papuan, new guinean,
N, N1 - proto-uralic,
N2, N3 - uralic, finnic, samoyedic,
O - thai-kadai,
O1, O2 - west austronesian, sinitic,
O3 - koreanic, japonic,
P1 - altaic, altaian, tuvan, soyot turkic,
Q, Q1a - ket, yeniseian,
Q1b - nadene/atabasq, native american,
R, R1 - mal'ta buret culture, uyghur turkic,
R1a - hunnic, turkic, ugric, european hunnic (khazar, tatar, avar, magyar, balkar, old bolgar, oghur), indian hunnic (chionit, kidarit, hephtalit, alchon, gaznevit, timurit, baburit),
R1b - sumer, saka, scythian, turkmen, turk, azeri/khazar, oghuz, gagauz, bashkir, basq, aquitan, vasconic, tyrrhenian, raetic, etruscan, old saxonian, old gaulic, old scottish etc),
R2 - dravidian, srilankan...
Also, maternally southeast asian mtdna haplogroups are distinct from european R mtdna major group (H, V, J, T, U, K mtdna). Just B, F, P mtdna haplogroups migrated together with southeast asian mtdna people like M mtdna major group (E, Q, O, C, D, G, Z mtdna) and N mtdna major group (A, X, S, I, W, Y mtdna). E, O, P, Q, S mtdna and partly other B, M, N mtdna have remained in west, east austronesia, australia, polynesia. Other group have migrated to northern east asia and north euroasia together with ydna haplogroups.
Some part of A, B, C, D, X mtdna have migrated to americas together with C3, R, Q1b ydna. Some part of A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, W, X, Y, Z mtdna have remained in north asia, northeast asia, siberia or migrated to west into east euroasia and central asia together with C3, N2, N3, Q1a, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna. They have constructed those hunnic empires, sumerian, scythian civilisations etc. in history. Those were altai region originated asiatic people.
After they come across with the fusional language speaking (indoeuropean, afroasiatic) people, they have mixed eachother resulting to different nations including both uralic-altaic, dene-yeniseian and indoeuropean, afroasiatic people in different regions. Roman vs Hunnic war was including these different but mixed eastern and western tribes in both side.
Golden Huns? Nonsense. And in no way were the Sakas Huns.
@@maximus3160 Both Sakas and Huns have altaic origins genetically as being descendants of altaic (altaian, tuvan, uyghur turkic) people. Is there any genetic evidence collapsing my theory? Unfortunately no! If you have an idea, I am open to listen.
The voice of this narrator is amazing. What is his name please? Great video thank you
In a manuscript of Otto of Freising's History of Two Cities an editor, seemingly from the thirteenth century, added a marginal note to a passage describing the conversion of a king of the Huns at the time of the Emperor Justinian. This note commented that the Turks' were formerly known as 'Huns' and that Western Huns are now called Hungarians and Avars. This comment, whilst obscure and late, demonstrates that this author at least understood that a link existed between the Turks and Hungarians. There is an earlier source that makes a similar point. This is the Chronicle of Montecassino, which in an account of the First Crusade's crossing of Asia Minor, refers to the Seljuk Turkish ruler, Qilij Arslan of Nicaea, as the 'king of Huns, who now we call Turks
Sogdian sources mention that the Turks are closely related to the Huns.
Also, Indian sources mentioned that the Turks are related to the Huns.
And the Byzantine sources confirmed that the Bulgarians are the same as the Huns, and the Bulgarian kings confirmed in their sources and inscriptions that they were descended from the lineage of the Hun kings.
13 century written - knowledge is not from 1st- 2nd - 3rd -4th century .
Fabulous. Most intetesting.
The oldest runes are from Norway, and are approximately 1800-2000 years old. They seem to be influenced by Latin and Etruscan. However, Runes were used by all Germanic tribes, even in present day Hungary.
The last time was a rune, which dates to the year 428, and the Turks found the stone. I would like to share the link.
Molto interessante! Grazie!
I'd say that the actual legacy of the White Huns are the Hazara and not at all the Pashtun. They do carry (among other East Asian genetics) the so-called "Genghis Khan lineage", however I'm persuaded that's not a Mongolian heritage but a much older one ("molecular clock" is rubbish, at least the way shcolastic orthodoxy uses it), one that almost certainly pertains to the Turkic/Hunnic expansion. Also notice the similitude Hazara = Khazars.
Khalaj people also have a good claim on the White Huns since some of their successor polities were ethnically Khalaj (Zunbils & Turk Shahis) although White Huns themselves were more likely Oghuric, the Hunnic component in the Varchonites is also assumed to be of White Hun stock
@@nenenindonu - Maybe, I'm not familiar with that nation (just learning about them as we speak).
I also don't really understand what "Oghur(ic)" means, aren't all Turkics Oghuric? Which Turkics (other than maybe weird Siberian branches like the Yakut) are not Oghuric? When did the Oghur concept first coalesced?
@@LuisAldamizIt's still debated when exactly the Oghur Turkic-Common Turkic separation occurred however the former got greatly replaced by the latter today all Turkic languages other than Chuvash belong to Common Turkic
@@nenenindonu - Yakut/Sakha included? That suggests that Oghur is core-Turkic and that Bulgars (proto-Chuvash) may have been indeed an admixed population with a creole dialect of their own. A wild guess anyhow.
@@LuisAldamizYakut also belongs to the Siberian branch of Common Turkic, Chuvash is a very obscure language with a considerable Finno-Ugric component, it's also fascinating how it didn't get Kipchakized due to the imperial influence of the Golden Horde unlike other originally non-Kipchak languages like Kyrgyz, Kazakh,...
I hope those nomadic rulers would get the appreciation they deserve! :)
38:36 That's to nicest statue I've ever seen in my life. Probably also one of the biggest. At first I thought that the horse was too small. Later I learned that back then they had small horses/ pony's. It's an old breed. Those big horses we are custom to in EU weren't there yet.
Thanks you so much for this history lesson!
Please mark Budapest correctly on map. The marking should be more to the west and upwards where the Danube turns south. Now the marking point is set by the Tisza river.
Any videos on the Bulgars soon? Probably one of the most interesting but least discussed Turkic peoples.
Yes. They will be part of the next video.
@@ds-on4smEncyclopedias and Bulgarian historians are very unreliable sources.
Are you crazy?
The Bulgars were by yellow race from Central Asia!
A Turkic-Mongol population!
Not white!
Not European!
Turco-Mongols like the Hungarians, Estonians and Finns!@@ds-on4sm
The Historians and science says that, man!@@ds-on4sm
I repeat, the Huns were Mongolic! Yeallow race!
Do not like that?
Man, his race were yellow! Because the Huns came from Central Asia! His face were Mongolic! Not white!
The race of Huns were yellow race not white race! The old Bulgarians were Turco-Mongolian! The old Bulgarians came from Central Asia too!!! Now, the Bulgarian people is European and Balkanic because they assimilated white people from Balkans like Tracians, Latins, Greeks etc.! Now, they are white!!!
The most Bulgarians are European natives assimilated by the old Proto-Bulgarians1
Clear?@@ds-on4sm
Attila the Hun, one of history's most feared leaders, once set his sights on the region now known as Romania. During the 5th century, Attila led the Huns in a series of invasions across Europe, and Romania’s territory, with its strategic Carpathian Mountains and proximity to the Roman Empire, was a key area for his campaigns. Although Attila never fully conquered the land, his incursions left a lasting mark on Romania’s early history, shaping its cultural landscape and historical narratives.
Rettegett??? Na,megint jót nevettem! Nézze meg a NÉPEK emlékezését Attiláról,a hunokról! Nem a fizetett tudósokról beszélek!
The painting shown in 19:48 is called ''Asparukh (such a Turkic name, isn't it?) at the Battle of Ongal'' by Vasil Goranov, and the sword on the book's cover in 26:20 is the sword of Kubrat, the founder of Bulgaria.
Also,
Modern genetic studies of bone material from Bulgarian burials from the period of the early Middle Ages clearly shows that the ethnic appearance of the discovered bodies belongs to the Indo-European group. Archaeologically, the Proto-Bulgarians belong to the Sarmato-Alan cultures.
The Proto-Bulgarians as inhabitants of the lands north of the Caucasus in the 2nd century are mentioned by the Armenian historian Movses Khorenatsi. In his History of Armenia, written in the 80's of the 5th century AD, he speaks about two migrations of Proto-Bulgarians from Caucasus to Armenia. Proto-Bulgarians lived amongst Sarmato-Alan and Slavic tribes for centuries before migrating to the Balkans. However, Turkic elements could also be found due to the influence of the Avars (mostly) and the Göktürks.
Most of the names of the rulers and aristocrats of the First Bulgarian Empire are of Iranian origin.
Names such as Sinnion, Zabergan, Kubrat/Xovrat, Bezmer/Bozmihr, Asparukh, Tervel, Kormes, Sevar, Kardam, Krum, Omurtag/Murtag, Negavon, Okorsis/Korsis, Malamir, Boris, Rasate, etc., are proven to be (Indo)Iranian and generally Indo-European in origin (and etymology) and does not have Turkic analogues. The last pagan ruler of Bulgaria was literally called Persian/Presian.
There is NO historical source or evidence of Tengrism in Bulgaria. The only "evidence" that suggests the alleged presence of ''Tangra/Tengri'' in the Bulgarian lands is a damaged fragmentary inscription found near Madara. The argument that the name "Tangra" was written on it has been refuted many times over the years.
@@ds-on4sm This is the first time I see someone so fiercely insisting that he's a descendant of a bare footed slave (Slav) wearing a single linen shirt, instead of a Turk Warrior in full mail armor. 😆
here was a migration of nations. So the Huns
moved to Europe and died out. They could
not leave descendants. Roman Empire to rule
the state needs a font Then what script did
the Huns writhe in. The Mongol Empire is a fact
Hun Empire fantasy. That's why get tangled up
there Mongols When the Huns lived next to the
Mongols do not hlave Mongolian language
Mongols are not Turks not Muslims
Thise were the clan wars Not nations.
Dzingischan built roads After which he went
the shop. So that foods would not be stolen
He was bringing the law did nothing for fame
I think you should review the examples of names you have given. In addition, Mogul and Turkish are separate languages. 😊
Balamber is the ancestor of the Oghuz. Balaam-ber means the one who gives a son or the one who gives children.
The Hunnic Empire and the period of rule: (374 - 496)
Balamber, (Balamir) (374 - Unknown)
Uldiz (west) (380? - 410), son or grandson of Balamber
Carton (west) (410 - 422)
Rua (422 - 434), brother of Muncuk, Aybars and Oktar
Attila (434 - 453), son of Muncuk
Ilek (453 - 454), son of Attila
Dengizik (454 - 496), son of Attila
Irnek (496 - Unknown), son of Attila
Kubrat is %100 Turkish name. Like Arpat abd Asparukh.
These names are still used as names or surnames in Turkish countries.
All pre-Christian Bulgarian kings have Turkish names.
Even the titles they take are Turkish.
Is the background music from Final Fantasy?
Top notch video~
So many good content.
I AM hoping for flash point history and now for you
Great movie. Lot’s of info. Thanks.
Is that...final fantasy 7 background music??
Отличная аналитика, исторический взгляд на роль гуннов в падении Римской империи. Фигура Атиллы навечно вписана в мировую историю
Being Hungarian is a proud beauty..
Nowadays, people believe again in fate, in God... More and more people are saying the idea that: There are no coincidences!
If this is true, everything that happens in our world has a reason, then can we ignore the fact that we were born Hungarian? Or, there are no coincidences, but that doesn't matter? Of course! If you were born here, you have a duty! Completing the task begins with the fact that we do not gloss over our Hungarianness, but find out what it means to be Hungarian. What kind of task has God (fate, universe...) assigned us as Hungarians.
Árpád's Hungarians come to the inheritance of Atilla the Hun, as descendants to the Carpathians, Hunnia, Hungary. They take possession of the rightful inheritance, without a fight, because it turns out that the people who live here speak our language, our relatives. The Turul dynasty, of which Atilla is a member, was called the Árpád house in the Middle Ages, and can present one of the oldest family trees in the world, as Atilla descends from Nimród. According to our able chronicle, our first king was Atilla and our first king István. It's not a mistake, that's what the chronicle says about both of them. So we have a ruling family with the oldest ancestry in Europe and a rightful heritage, the Carpathians, the Carpathian Basin. There are many things that connect us with certain peoples connected here, of whom we can also say - and I say - our relatives.
The Greeks describe the Scythians as saying that their soldiers retreat in battle, then unexpectedly attack back and destroy the ranks of the enemy, who were already confused in the pursuit, with a counterattack. This is what the Romans wrote about the Parthians, from whom they suffered a crushing defeat twice. This is the news about the Huns, the Avars, and about us Hungarians as well. In fact, our national symbol, the falcon that forms the basis of TURUL, also fights in the air in this way.
We know from our legislation that at first it consists of only 5 points (the blood contract), then it expands, again and again by recording freedoms when they seem to be forgotten. According to the Greeks, the Scythians carry the truth not in the law book, but in their hearts. Atilla, God's Whip, is stern but fair. It is based on his judgment that he destroys entire cities, at other times he leaves a monastery or a church if he finds righteous people, and sometimes he pardons the entire city, see the case of Rome.
We do not sign a contract in front of a notary, but in an authentic place (presbytery, canonry), in front of God. In case of breach of contract, God's Judgment is common. The most common is the ordeal by fire, which in the 1300s ended with more than 50% healing. Our relationship with God, loyalty to the truth plays a prominent role in our lives. (Dr. Tibor Varga)
According to the Holy Crown Doctrine, which is the written reality of a customary law, everyone deserves a life worthy of a human being. The goods required for this cannot be alienated, and cannot be transferred to private hands. Today, this would be the agricultural land, road network, drinking water supply, telephone, post office, railway... These are the properties of the Holy Crown, which cannot be alienated by either the king or the parliament. Although this system does not serve profit maximization, it gives an opportunity for a life worthy of a human being. (Dr. Tibor Varga)
as a Turk we should meet in Kurultaj
Never was called "Arpád house"
😊
Would be so much better than the loud, intrusive music and sound effects.
What software do you use to make those map graphics?
Great video and study.Atilla 2 nd wife princes of Roma,Honoria give a birth to Atila
son called CHABA.-CSABA today.and a Székely people in Transilvánia are a desendance of king Csaba.Kigg Csaba spend 19 years in Byzantine beside of his grandfather Honorius who was a emperor of Byzantine.After when his grandfather Honorius died, he and his Hun-magyar-avar.székely people went to king Atila father Murduk-Mundzuk.who was still in life around north part of Black sea..
All respect for the work! Good job! Really enjoyed the video❤. Tho.. in allmoast all documentarys about great kings and generals.. moast experts use the words "ilogical or improbabil or less likely or irational" but does anyone consider the ego( ego can be and for shure was the reason of many "ilogical actions") such a powerfull king into consideration? Sry for my english as is not my first language.
keep going we ar proud off u
You are the only channel that establishes the connection between Xiongnu, Huns and Gokturks. Instead of explaining it biasedly like other western channels, you explained the connection with the Turks objectively. They are all the continuation of each other, Huns established a steppe federation and of course there would be Mongols and Persians. But the majority of the army and the administration are ethnically Turks. Do your research from objective sources instead of biased ones. Good job. Respect!
In ancient and medieval history sources, travelers and historians defined the Turkish peoples as Kipchaks, Cumans, Alans, Khazars, Hun - Bulgarians, Oghuz Turks, Yenisei Kyrgyz and White Huns as "Caucasoid" rather than Asian in phenotype
Sources: Ammianus Marcelinus, Mattia De Edesse, Abul Feda Yosef, Biruni, Ibn Khaldun, Ibni Rabbihi, Istakhri, Said El Maghribi, Gerdizi, El Mesudi, El Omari, Nizami,, Chronicles of China Tang. Igor Epic..
Additionally, Proto Turks were never genetically mongoloid. Unlike Mongoloid DNA (c-o), They are belong to Caucausoid (r1,j2,g2,q) Haplogroups
Characterictic Haplogroups in Proto-Turkic Groups
Scythians- r1a-z93+q1a
Huns- r1a-z93+q1a+j2a
Gokturks - r1a-z93+j2a+q1a
Uyghurs - r1a-z93+j2a
Kipchaks- r1a-z93+r1b
Cumans- r1a-z93+g2a
Bulgarians- r1a-z93+q1a
Alans- r1a-z93+g2a-p+j2a
Khazars- r1a-z93+j2a+g2a
Avars- r1a-z93+g2a+j2a
Burcans- r1a-z93-g2a
Proto-Kyrgyz- r1a-z93+j2
Oghuzs- r1b+r1a-z93+j2a
Magyars- r1a+r1b+g2a
Pechenegs- r1a+r1b+g2a
Tatars- r1b+r1a+Q
The Etruscan dynasty also belongs to the nomadic haplogroups r1b and r1a with the highest frequency. That's why Honorary Italian History Professor Mario Alinei described the Roman Etruscan dynasty as having Turkish origin. You can browse.
The Scythians and Etruscans were not Turkic
@@Nastya_07 Then why did Herodotus say that Persians and Scythians were different peoples? Why did Byzantine and European chroniclers throughout history refer to Turkish peoples such as Khazar, Ases, Cuman, Tatar, Pecheneg and Avar as Scythians? Why did they not mention any Persian people as Scythians? Why were the Turks mentioned with a Caucasoid phenotype like the Scythians in all written sources in history? Why do Scythians have the same genetics as many Turkish peoples and not with Persian peoples?
@@Sranuri Then why did Herodotus say that Persians and Scythians were different peoples?
-Well, there were certainly diferences in culture, lifestyle and also language to some degree (Scythians spoke Eastern Iranian, Persians speak Western Iranian)
Why did Byzantine and European chroniclers throughout history refer to Turkish peoples such as Khazar, Ases, Cuman, Tatar, Pecheneg and Avar as Scythians?
-Byzantine sources call Hungarians Turks, even though Hungarians are Uralic.
Why did they not mention any Persian people as Scythians?
-Because they aren't (again, Scythians Eastern Iranian, Persians speak Western Iranian)
Why were the Turks mentioned with a Caucasoid phenotype like the Scythians in all written sources in history?
-Ossetians are Caucasoid too.
Why do Scythians have the same genetics as many Turkish peoples and not with Persian peoples?
-Because most Scythians got assimilated by the Turks.
Brittanica
-"Scythian, member of a nomadic people, originally of Iranian stock,"
Iranica
-"SCYTHIANS, a nomadic people of Iranian origin who flourished in the steppe lands north of the Black Sea during the 7th-4th centuries BCE."
Golden, Peter B. (2011). Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes
page 21-22:
-"We may set aside theories, now fashionable in some quarters, which attempt to link or identify various Iranian peoples of Antiquity with the Turkic-speaking world. Even further afield, peoples and civilizations encompassing much of Europe and even the New World have been declared Turkic. These theories have found little in the way of substantiation. More interesting, but perhaps equally a stretch are the attempts made by Denis Sinor, among others, to link Turk with the Ἱύρκαι of Herodotos (IV. 22),"
page 24:
-"If the “Tyrcae” are, indeed, the Türks, a major migration from the western Eurasian steppes to Inner Asia would be required for them to appear in the Chinese borderlands in the sixth century. Of this we have no record either in the Chinese historical tradition or in the Türk tradition. Moreover, while Indo-Europeans (Indo-Iranians and Tokharians) clearly moved eastward into Inner Asia, the movement of Inner Asian Altaic speakers (among whom the Turkic peoples are ranked), according to the historical record, has been from east to west."
@@Nastya_07
None of these are the correct answer.
1. "The more common view is the "Turcæ" tribe of the Scythians, which was also mentioned by Pliny and Mela and gave its name to today's Turkic geography (Turkestan)."
(The Natural History. Pliny the Elder. John Bostock, M.D., F.R.S. H.T. Riley, Esq., B.A. London. Taylor and Francis, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street. / Chap.7)
The Scythians, the ancestors of the Nomads, came from the Altai region BC in the 10-9 centuries to North Caucausia. Scythians are originally a Caucasoid race from Altai. There is no definitive opinion that the Scythians spoke Iranian language. This is still a theory. The fact that the characteristic haplogroups of Proto Turkic Peoples are R1a-z93 (Scythian) and R1b-m343(Sarmatian) instead of mongoloid (C1-m130) is proof of this.
2. You made it up. Byzantine and European chroniclers mention the Avars Bulgarians Khazars Ases and Cumans Turks living in the North Caucasus and Central Asia. not the Hungaria.
"Byzantines encountered the Gokturks ,Khazar , Kipchaks and Pechenegs Turks. And their language, their clothing, and
They found their culture so similar to the Scythians that they referred to them all as "Scythians".
(Kaegi, W. E. (2003). Heraclius: Emperor of Byzantium (First Edition) Cambridge:Cambridge
University Press, 140-151.).
3. Also The interesting thing is that the genetics of Hungarians are similar to Cumans and are agglutinative like Turkish languages.
for example
hg: Jebemmen śok kiszik alma van.
tr: cebimde çok küçük elma var.
eng: There is a very small apple in my pocket
4. In addition, contrary to classical encyclopedia sites, archaeological, anthropological and genetic research on the Scythians indicates that there is no connection between the Scythians and the Ossetians. New genetic and linguistic studies connect the Scythians to the Turks.
Also The genetic lineage of the Karachay and Balkar Turks is mostly the same as the Schytian-Alans. Karachay Turks Characterictic Haplogroups R1a-z93-z2123 36% + G2a1-p15-16 %34%
Unfortunately, the Scythian Characteristic Haplogroup R1a-z2123 (%42) is 1-2% in Ossetians.
www.familytreedna.com/groups/k-balkar-dna/about/background
www.familytreedna.com/public/Ossetian/default.aspx?section=yresults
5. SCYTHIANS
Scythians: A Turkic people speaking the Ancient Turkic language
(Edward A. Bond, Russia At The Close Of The Sixteenth Century: Comprising, The Treatise "of The Russe Common Wealth” by Dr. Giles Fletcher; and The Travels of Sir Jerome Horsey, Hakluyt, s. 94.)
Scythians: Ancestors of the Turkic Origin Huns and Fins Warrior nomads
( John Gent, The Scythie Nations, Down to the Fall of the Western Empire, Kessinger Publishing, s. 21, 45 - 46.)
Scythians: Ancestors of Today's Kyrgyz Turks A confederation of nomadic Turkic people
(Nathan Light, “History, experience and narration: novel accounts and multiplex stories”, History
Making in Central and Northern Eurasia: ContemporaryActors and Practices, Jacquesson, Svetlana, Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig ReichertVerlag, 2016, s. 152. )
Scythians: Ancestors of the Kipchak Cuman Turks. Turkic-speaking nomads.
(Leon Cahun, Introduction to Asian History: From Origins to 1405, Turks and Mongols 2006, p. 40.)
R. Caldwell; Turanian languages or the Ural-Altaic language family, that is, the Scythian group and the Dravidian group, are related in terms of roots and structure.
(CALDWELL, Robert, A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian
Family of Languages p.29, London)
Scythian language, is related to Dravid , Ugric and Turkic "Tatar, Bashkir, Kyrgyz" languages.
(NEUMANN, Karl Johann Heinrich, Die Hellenen Im Skythenlande: Ein Beitray Zur
Alten Geographic, Etnographic und Handelsgeschicte, Berlin p.139-154)
Boris Zhivkov; The similarity between Scythian beliefs and Turkish mythology attracts attention.
(ZHİVKOV, Boris, Khazaria in the Ninth and Tenth Centuries, Brill, 2015. p.112)
"The Greeks now call the people known as Scythians "Tatars".
(English Historian V. Mitford - History of Greeks From Books 1838, p.419)
The fact that the Scythians are Turks does not need proof"
(R.Latama, 1854, p.45 - Russian Geographical Bulletin)
The first written Russian historians A.Lizlov and N.Tatishchiev also state that the Scythians were the ancestors of the Turkic tribes.
The Turks, formerly called Scythians, sent peace ambassadors to Yustin" (Vizontiyskiye İstoriki, 1861, 376)
@@Nastya_07Hello, the assimilation of the Scythians is not an obstacle to the existence of the same habligroup in the DNA of today's Iranian people! If the Iranians are Scythians, they must carry Scythian DNA. But there isn't!
3:46: damn, I love AI created images and a good historical description😄
who are onoguri,kutriguri,utiguri and so on tribes?Why some historians say onoguri,or kutriguri hunns,other kutriguri,or onoguri bulgars?
Kutrigurs (9 tribes), Utigurs (30 tribes), onogurs (10 tribes) are bulgar tribes who, after Attila's death, from the time of his son Ernak, are within and who now come to the fore of the Hun state/confederation. Hun is the political term that kept being used. Politically, they were still Hun at the time and components of the state/confederation. Според автора, който се споменава във видеото, Ким и неговата книга Хуните, тия българи тепърва идват от изток и влизат, като подчинени на Ернак, в останалата източна част от Хунското политическо тяло и го преобразяват. Ще цитирам тук някои части от книгата (тъкмо я чета), ако не е проблем.
From The Huns (Peoples of the Ancient World) by Hyun Jin Kim:
"The task of salvaging what was left of the eastern half of the Hunnic Empire fell on Ernakh, the youngest of Attila’s sons."
"[E]rnakh apparently became the founding ruler of the so-called ‘Bulgar’ Huns (that is according to the Bulgar Prince list), the confederation of Huns and the various Oghurs subdued by Ernakh. This unification was made easier it seems by the fact that the Huns themselves were largely an Oghuric Turkic speaking people. The Oghur tribes that flooded into the Ukraine and southern Russia to avoid Rouran (Avars?) and Sabir (Xianbei?) domination were in all likelihood formerly constituent members of the Hunnic confederacy/state (possibly that of the Yueban Huns) in Central Asia that had fragmented under Rouran pressure.
... The new Oghur arrivals, however, made a lasting impact on the nature of the Hunnic state that emerged in the late fifth century AD. As Golden astutely points out, the names of the two wings of this reconfigured Hunnic state: Kutrigur (9 Oghurs) Huns in the west and the Utigur (30 Oghurs) Huns in the east, both contain the element Oghur in their political designation. That these two wings were the constituent parts of the same Hunnic state and not originally separate political groups, is confirmed by the records in Procopius and Menander that they had the same Hunnic origin. The foundation legend of these two wings is told by Procopius, who states that before the formation of both entities power in the steppe was concentrated in the hands of a single ruler (undoubtedly Ernakh, son of Attila). This ruler then divided the power/empire between his two sons called Utigur and Kutrigur (probably representative titles given to the two princes who headed these confederations or eponymous names later attributed to them). The peoples allocated to the two sons were then called Utigurs and Kutrigurs, with the Utigurs clearly possessing precedence in the typical Inner Asian manner, being mentioned first and occupying the senior position to the east of the confederacy/state, (Procopius 8. 5.1-4). This story in Procopius is clearly an allusion to real historical processes, which took place in the late fifth century AD when Ernakh reunited the Pontic steppe and then in the usual Inner Asian manner divided his realm into two wings. Procopius goes on to locate the Utigurs in the Kuban steppe (southwestern Russia) and the Kutrigurs in ‘the greater part of the plains’ west of the Sea of Azov, i.e. southern Ukraine (8.5.22-3)."
"[T]hese two wings and another related group the Onogurs were also called Bulgars in our sources, indicating that ‘Bulgar’ was either an alternative name for these Huns or their new ethnic self-designation in addition to the political name ‘Hun’. Henceforth they were known collectively as Bulgar Huns. The terms Utigur, Kutrigur and Onogur were not ethnic designations, but terms signifying the socio-military organization of steppe peoples, 30, 9 and 10 oghurs (tribes/units)."
Attila defeated both Eastern and Western Roman empire. In 452 , the Western Roman empire became a vassal state, which supported by Priscus and Prosper of Aquitane ,who were both contemporaries.
Nonsense.
@@maximus3160And you seem to be a jew. At least you are using that jewish symbol. So. Why so furious? What is your problem beach?
@@katalinszekeres7400ur more triggered than he is HAH 😂
Good editing and narration.
Excellent work here Sir
Excellent video, thanks
What was the name of the "italian" peninsula before it being invaded by Attila ?
Toro or Tur (Tөр in Cyrillic) is ‘State’ or Ruling part in Mongolian language
Are the images AI-created? They seem somewhat... too glossy. The huns look like boy band members.
Indeed they are, with my own input. But it's difficult to create images in which neither the men nor women look like "models", hence their look in this video. In the newer videos, the characters look somewhat more normal.
@@KhansDenThank you for your answer. The movie was very well made!
Thank you for the video. You have amazingly accurately reproduced the appearance of the Huns. I am simply amazed at how accurately artificial intelligence reproduced the images of the Huns (Xiongnu). This is simply excellent. I just began to believe even more that our Chuvash ancestors were Xiongnu. I have photographs of my relatives and they are 100 percent similar to your photographs of the Huns. It is something. I'm just touched. It was as if I saw my distant relatives. The Chuvash are descendants of the Xiongnu. That's for sure. Both in language and now in appearance... I'm sure. It was they who invisibly drew your portraits of the Huns. We Chuvash even have a clan called Mushchak (Attila’s father), I found out last week. Your hand and thoughts are invisibly led in the right direction by our great ancestors - the Xiongnu. In Chuvash, man is translated as Shun. Tavtapushch sir (in Chuvash this means thank you) We have an ancient saying that if the Chuvash disappear, the world will disappear. The Huns, represented by the Chuvash, have not left the world stage of history. They, as before, will still say their word for the glory of humanity.... Tour Shchirlakh!!!
My Hungarian ex-girlfriend was One of the most perfect creatures that ever lived, emitting a glory that would blind any mortal man. I find no fault with the engineering judgement of the man she married after dropping me.
The history of the Gaoju is given in the respective entry in WS 103 + (pp. 2505-2508); until the beginning of Text 1.056/B it is extracted as follows.
高車,蓋古赤狄之餘種也初號為狄歷,北方以為敕勒,諸夏以為高車、丁零。 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異,或云其先匈奴之也。
The Gaoju are probably the remaining tribes of the ancient Chidi [lit. 'the red Di']. Initially they were called Dili. People in the north called them Chile, whereas people in China proper called them Gaoju or Dingling.
Their language is roughly the same as that of the Xiongnu but at times has minor differences from that. Some say that their ancestors were the nephew of [i.e. indirectly related to] the Xiongnu.
I have heard and been told that there are some villages in Germany that bear a Hunnic appearance and other traits. The same also applies to a couple of villages in France. I have also read that Ottavakar(Odoacer) did not want to destroy the Roman Empire but to perpetuate it e.g.the Roman Church, the Holy Roman Empire and the modern day EU. During WW 2 the Germans were sometimes called The Huns.
Huns were Oghuric speaking Turks but they led an army of diverse peoples of Indo European speakers
Page 441
To judge by the tribal names, a great part of the Huns must have spoken a Turkish language. Ultincur and Alpilcur are as Turkish as Bug-cor, the Pecheneg tribal names ending in t£ovq, and the Kirghiz tribal and clan names ending in coro. Another common ending in Turkish tribal names, -gur, occurs in Kutrigur, Utigur, Onogur, Bittugur, *Tongur, and *Ugur. On the analogy with Ultincur, Ultingir, ending in -gir like other definitely Turkish ethnic names, must likewise be Turkish. The same is true for Bardor = Var-dor and Ultindur.
Page 72
The Hunnic noblemen, Attila's relatives and retainers, have either Turkish or Germanic names. There evidently were few, if any, Alans among the leading group. As no people ever emigrated to the last man, some Alans presumably stayed in Hungary after 406, but they played a minor role. Most of their tribal and clan leaders had left.
Page 403
That the Huns included Turkish-speaking tribes can be regarded as established only if a number of personal and tribal names of the Huns are undoubtedly as Turkish as orfevre is French, goldsmith English, and Goldschmied German. One such name is *alp-il-cur.
Page 474748 😂😂😂
Thanks .
Great video guys. Production, informational content and the narration (both speed and voice pitch) were all top level.
Thoroughly enjoyed, many thanks 🙏
7:25= Kucha = the place where was the first time domestise wolf & other wild dog types . They named the place for all humanity = Kutya , still call the dogs in hungarian ( magyar ) language . There is a other proof place , where the wild horses was first domesticated by our race , the place name is : ló ... in turania - altaj [ al táj of the montains ] home of our races during the iceage in europe , then moving back to central europe , where they was lived before iceage . Etc...
I thought _kara_ (black) was associated with prestige and honor, hence so many people and places named with it, i.e. Karakalpak, Karakorum, Ankara, Karamanid, Kara Osman, etc.
Great video again my friend thank you for telling the story of our ancestors in a non-demonizing way, growing up in the west the Huns are the bad guys but truly they were the tools of God
Is it because of that that God killed them all?
@@عليياسر-ذ5بRumanova?
@@katalinszekeres7400 No Hun
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب Right. There's an endless list of enemies anyways of Hungarians since forever. No surprise. And if the dark middle age never ends, I don't even care anyways. Enjoy the Psycho Pire, that's all what you got.
There is no direct relation between the Germanic runes and that Turkish ones. Runes are just the ancient form that letters had, preferring straight lines as you can see in Archaic Greek and Etruscan inscriptions, before classical letters came into being. It was much easier to carve straight lines into wood than curved ones and it still is. The Germanic runes are directly connected to the Greek and Roman letters, you can actually still read them by knowing the Latin alphabet, some Germanic language (such as English) and a little exercise. Turkish runes are a very distant relative, therefore they have not been deciphered till quite recently.
The Huns had Germanic people as their troops and paying tribute so I believe they influenced them
@@amosnaftali2495 Well not for the writing system, because Germanic people had their rune alphabet since the 1st c. AD at least and the Huns came only at the end of the 4th c. into Europe. Huns had an influence by their political system and warfare most probably, but not on writing. There are by the way no remains of Hun writing so we don't know if they had any. The 24 letters of the Germanic rune alphabet are very very similar to the Roman and Greek ones, you can read it yourself sometimes without any knowledge of runes! whereas the Turks got their alphabet by contact with Central Asiatic cultures.
@@petrapetrakoliou8979 they found Hunnic runes in Syria in 2021
@@amosnaftali2495 don't know about that. Huns are difficult to identify in their homelands already, so it wouldn't be very easy to identify them in Syria. Or do you mean Hunnic for Turcic, because the Goktürks did have a runic system from the 8th century? As I said for the Germanic runes, there was zero Hunnic influence as we have them unchanged from before and after the Hunnic period. It is in the late 8th century that Germanic runes change into the Viking runes, which is mainly a simplification of the system, probably due to changes in the language.
You said Pashtoon in Afghanistan but it is originally Hazaras. Hazaras are the Turkes whom still has 60 to 90 percent central Asian gens according to genetic tests. Hazaras ancestors was created Koshanian Empire.
This is turk propaganda by a German Turkish immigrant using AI and lies.
CE? I think you mean AC.
با افتخار من تورکم تورکه ایرانی🤘🐺
Those of you who are interested in the relationship of the Huns and the Hungarians, refer to recent DNA findings by Hungarian Scientist, who conducted extensive DNA studies of Hun skeletons in Hunnic cemeteries in Mongolia. The DNA findings directly identify the Huns and the Hungarians being of the same race.
Huns are a Turkic group of people.
@@youravaragetoxicmasculinem9508 Are you saying that Genetics, Culture, food or nourishment and weaponry has no relevance?
@@hunguy3280 No and Genetics, Culture, food or nourishment and weaponry shows that they are a Turkic group of people, litterally every source will say that.
I'm tired of always hearing the same thing which is not actually true , Hungarians Are Huns no friend they are not, they just speak old Bulgarian which is actually a Turkic language (Chuvash language Bulgarian language Tatar language, Chuvash and old Bulgarian are direct descendants of the Huns language) , and settled where the Huns had previously been , don't confuse Huns with Magyars :-) You Hungarians have a huge history in the Medieval ages , and especially the wars with the Ottomans , and in later times the Austro-Hungarian Empire - but just stop claiming everywhere that Hungarians are Huns
@@ivianivanov2260do you know better than the recent DNA analysis? Are you an expert, or just dislike Hungarians?
The Huns were a diverse coalition of Eurasian nomads but their rulers were Turkic-Mongolic peoples who also themselves are also admixed Eurasian peoples
More like central and East Asians
So Schythians, Dacians just evaporated?
By the time of the 5th century, neither Scythians nor Dacians were feasible as an entity.
Huns exterminated them.
@KhansDen There might be a better explanation. Let's say that this is right, which quite possibly has a reason. Then who really, really are the Huns? Another unknown? And how suddenly they had the whole East Europe? How come so easy everybody aligned with them? Maybe it has something to do with another magic that nobody wants or is uncomfortable to tackle the disappearance of the so-called Sarmats. And maybe there is another name that we missed, the Masagets. O, no, they also disappeared. But wait, they CAME BACK to Europe just when Huns showed up? Chronology certainly mach. This "nonsense" does not fit the Slavic and Tyurkic and Mongol or Iranian narratives but maybe explains some archeological findings. The Enigma of Europeans in Central Asia. The puzzling subject that everyone avoids, especially after the Second World War, so it won't be blamed? Lots of professional historians in comfortable positions won't tackle discrepansies but would rather repeat old dogmas. Maybe, just maybe, Gettae and Moesians, for which has a lot of mentioning in the old authors, are the missing link? The one that does not exactly fit most narratives and is systematically "overlooked."
So, if Sarmats are the Moeso-Getti (Tracians who settled in much earlier times) and also it has been written "Sarmats are the Asian Schythians", than puzzle is getting in place There is a lot of "missed" or intentionally overlooked evidence for that. But until this is accepted, it might take time. Truth, based on facts and logic, will overcome.💪
@@utvara1 The rather incorporated.
@@VesislavDyulgerov-nr6rc no, genetics show this
3:07= Modu Chanyu = MAG CSÁNY , chanyu ( today : csány , all over in europe in old laguages ) . Tengri = tengeri , kut : kút(fő) tanyu -> tanya = the overall territory of them . Etc...
❤ this content
Надо:
3:37
10:00
34:04
30:00-40:00
36:34
Понравилось, использую возможно:
Вакуум власти[4:16]
Достигло своего апогея[высшую степень 7:56]
Конфронтация [23:00]
Дополнительная инфа:
6:56
17:38
20:00
26:25
28:46
30:34
ı wonder will you share midjourney images in the video?
Just did! You can check them out on my Artstation profile, here's the link: www.artstation.com/a/30441503
It's a way to keep this channel running and covering all the costs. However, I also share images for free from time to time on the community tab.
Were the Huns Turks or Mongols ?
Oghur branch of Turkic peoples
We don't actually know.
@@bobhaverbeck7585 Turkicness of Huns is as obvious as the Germanicness of Gepids
They are Asiatic steppe nomadic people. They are related to both Turks and Mongol
This can be surmised by analysing the names of Hunnic princes and tribes. The names of the following Hunnic princes are clearly Oghuric Turkic in origin: Mundzuk (Attila's father, from Turkic Munc uq = pearl/jewel: for an in-depth discussion of the Hunnic origin of this name in particular see Schramm (1969), 139-40), Oktar/Uptar (Attila's uncle, Öktär brave/powerful), Oebarsius (another of Attila's paternal uncles, Arbårs leopard of the moon), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qarâton = black-cloak), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bársig = governor), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig, meaning brave or noble, or Quršiq meaning belt-bearer). For these etymologies see Bona (1991), 33. Three of Attila's known sons. have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila's principal wife, the mother of the crown prince' Ellac, has the Turkic name Herekan, as does another notable wife named Eskam. See Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 392-415. See also Bona (1991), 33-5, and Pritsak (1956), 414. Most known Hunnic tribal names are also Turkic, Maenchen-Helfen (1973), 427-41, e.g. Ultincur, Akatir etc. The cur suffix in many of these names is a well-known Turkic title and as Beckwith (1987), 209, points out the To-lu or Tardus tribes (Hunnic in origin) of the Western Turkish On Oq were each headed by a Cur (noble). Zieme (2006), 115, speculates that the title cur belongs to a pre-Turkic Tocharian stratum of the Turkic language, which, if true, again highlights the essential heterogeneity of Central Asian peoples and even languages. See also Aalto (1971), 35. In addition to this primary language (Oghuric Turkic), Priscus informs us that Latin and Gothic were also understood by the Hunnic elite. See Priscus, fr. 13.3, Blockley (1983), 289.
The name of Ellac, Attila’s eldest son, is a corruption of the Turkic älik ( ilik ) meaning ‘ruler, king’. 21 Ernak/Irnik the youngest son also has the variation of the same suffix in his name. His name is probably Turkic är-näk , meaning ‘great hero’, with the suffix here functioning as an augmentation of the Turkic är-än (hero). 22 Thus the suffix -ik/ich was used in Hunnic to imply greatness (i.e. ruler or kingship). These names were, it seems, formal court titles rather than personal names.
Kim, H. (2013). The end of the Hunnic Empire in the west. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 89-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naturally we also have more probable Turkic etymologies for these names, especially for those of Attila and Bleda. However, even if they were Germanic or Germanicized Turkic names," ,99 this does not allow us to make any hasty assumptions about the official language of the empire, if it ever existed. What Heather ignores is the fact that we have convincing or highly probable Turkic etymologies for the names of many of the other Hunnic kings and nobles before and after Attila, e.g. Mundzuk (Attila's father, from Turkic Muncuq = 'pearl/jewel'), Oktar/Uptar (Attila's uncle, Öktär = "brave/power ful'), Oebarsius (another of Attila's paternal uncles, Aïbârs = 'leopard of the moon'), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qaraton = 'black cloak'), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bårsig= 'governor'), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig, meaning 'brave or noble', or Qursiq meaning 'belt-bearer'). All three of Attila's known sons have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila's principal wife, the mother of the first son Ellac, has the Turkic name Herekan, as does another wife named Eskam (Ešqam = 'companion of the Shaman).102
It seems highly likely then from the names that we do know, most of which seem to be Turkic, that the Hunnic elite was predominantly Turkic speaking. However, in the western half of the empire, where most of their subjects spoke Germanic languages, the Huns may have used both Hunnic (Oghuric Turkic) and Gothic. Thus fief holders and royal family mem Ibers in the west who ruled Germanic tribes often bore Germanic or Germanicized titles (of great significance, as we will discover later on in the book), e.g. Laudaricus and Ardaric.105 Priscus, who is our only reliable source, being an actual eye-witness, tells us that at the Hunnic court Hunnic, Gothic and Latin were spoken, but with Hunnic always men tioned before Gothic. All three languages were apparently understood by the elite to some degree, so much so that Zercon the Moor could provoke laughter by jumbling all three together at a Hunnic banquet in the presence of Attila.107 There is, however, no indication anywhere that any of these three languages was the lingua franca.
Kim, H. (2013). Notes. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haussig (2000), 277, suggests that Oult or Oulti is a Greek rendering of the Oghuric Turkic word for the number six. What is interesting is the fact that in names such as Oultizouroi and Ultzincur above we have clearly two elements Oulti (six) + the Turkic title Cur (noble), meaning ‘the six lords’.
Kim, H. (2013). Notes. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 159-275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The core Turkic tribes of the Hunnic Empire from very early on all possessed different names: Akatziri , Alpidzuri, etc. in addition to their Hunnic identity.
Kim, H. (2013). Introduction. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Menisey fringe theory 😂
Sogdian sources mention that the Turks are closely related to the Huns.
Also, Indian sources mentioned that the Turks are related to the Huns.
And the Byzantine sources confirmed that the Bulgarians are the same as the Huns, and the Bulgarian kings confirmed in their sources and inscriptions that they were descended from the lineage of the Hun kings.
i once killed attila by chance early on in ''attila total war'' the huns collapsed quickly and it was the easiest playthrough i had. good times.
Thanks . What does mean "XIONGNU" in english ‽
The Chinese pronounced it in a way (Hung-nu) that it meant "fierce slave".
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
You call the whole of Central and Western Asian Nations Turkic. This is madness.
Did the Mongols establish Turks? Where did you learn history?? In addition, the Xiongnu people fled from western China, and today's Shanxi is the birthplace of the Xiongnu.
One may argue world history began with Chingis Khan, in the 13th century? Spoken by a true mongoloid
5:15map = Rouran khan = also as rüan - rüans - avars . Kidarites ( red huns : kidar -> kadar ites : leaders tribes .