Final M113 vehicle rolls off the line at Bandiana

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2012
  • BAE Systems Land and Integrated Systems Director Kim Scott handed Major General Grant Cavenagh a set of keys at the event to symbolise the completion of the last M113 production vehicle at Bandiana.
    More than 150 people attended to recognise the end of a decade long project to upgrade 431 M113s.
    Over the life of the project, more than 1000 people were involved in the project at three sites in two states -- Bandiana and at Williamstown in Victoria and Wingfield in South Australia.
    More than a million hours went into the project which included cutting and stretching the hulls and the design and integration of new sub-systems into the seven M113 vehicle variants.
    Mr Scott said that while the upgraded M113s looked similar to how they would have in the 1970's, they were 'a generational leap ahead' with improved firepower, protection and habitability from the original M113 A1 vehicle. The finished vehicles are also more reliable and faster following the upgrade.
    The project began in 2002, with the first completed vehicle delivered to the customer in January 2007.
    "It has been an enormously challenging project but one that has resulted in the final vehicle being completed well ahead of the contracted December 2012 deadline" said Mr Scott said.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 123

  • @HansCent
    @HansCent 4 года назад +51

    In 50 years, these same hulls will be back for the hover track upgrade.

    • @paulmcmullan9931
      @paulmcmullan9931 3 года назад +1

      By the time Boeing B-52 bombers are retired in 2050, they will have been in service for almost 90 years.

    • @gianpaolovillani6321
      @gianpaolovillani6321 3 года назад +5

      @@paulmcmullan9931 that's not true, they will also upgrade the B-52 bombers to make them last for many more decades!

  • @Grenadieros
    @Grenadieros 7 лет назад +46

    I drove M113 A1 and M 901 ITV in the Greek Army and i am proud of it
    Here in Greece the M113 is called "little duck" because is amphibious.
    This vehicle will always have a place in my heart,i had unforgettable memories when i served in the Army with it.

    • @googleaccount253
      @googleaccount253 3 года назад +3

      in Lebanon we still use those

    • @Grenadieros
      @Grenadieros 3 года назад +5

      @@googleaccount253 : Here in Greece we use it in borders because with these we can pass the river and attack to turkey.

    • @luvr381
      @luvr381 23 дня назад +1

      We had a TOW ignite while being loaded in our ITV.

  • @charliemarkovic4301
    @charliemarkovic4301 2 года назад +5

    A third class ride beats a first class walk any day!

  • @sergeanttrucker
    @sergeanttrucker 2 года назад +5

    113 and M577 crewman, US Army. Late 80s. Many adventures.

  • @ces4399
    @ces4399 2 месяца назад

    Drove one during my stint with 1-149AR with the CAARNG. Fun vehicle. I can see why it is an appreciated and loved vehicle worldwide.

  • @davidhayter8516
    @davidhayter8516 Год назад +5

    Don’t confuse these with the Viet nam era version. The original APCs showed up at BAE were cut in half and about eighteen inches added in the middle. This required the addition of another wheel with all the added suspension bits. The ‘hull’ was no longer buoyant and a few other upgrades eventually made these a neat piece of transport. We’re rather retro mostly mechanical which did make them a bit archaic. Spall curtains were necessary for personnel as being aluminium the hull wouldn’t stop a .303 round and there was interior splatter when a round penetrated the hull.

  • @AaronAlso
    @AaronAlso 2 года назад +4

    With aprox. 80,000 produced and an estimated 60% still in service worldwide I'd say the M113 is a well built and highly serviceable vehicle. Wish my Tesla was made this well.

    • @bigazza7829
      @bigazza7829 Год назад

      M113 was copied by the Americans..
      The Americans copied the Germans from WW2 when they built the panzar
      Research operation paperclip where the Americans stole over 1,500 German scientists!!
      The m113 has like 99% German genetics...

  • @nor0845
    @nor0845 3 года назад +2

    Hell I’m not even American but I’m saluting the M113. What a great machine.

  • @victormalone8107
    @victormalone8107 Год назад +2

    Drove them while in the Canadian military, loved every minute of it. They wouldn't be much use on a modern battlefield though. They were good in their day.

  • @cwool9081
    @cwool9081 3 года назад +6

    I drove a 113 and the mortar track 125 for 81 mm mortar. 1972 to 1975 with B Co 1/36 Inf Reg 3 RD Armor Division

    • @samueljesse2179
      @samueljesse2179 2 года назад

      German tank ace Kurt Knispel destroyed 195 Soviet tanks. Can you imagine such a hero🦾🐯

  • @sloanchampion85
    @sloanchampion85 5 лет назад +13

    I drove them many miles and slept in them many nights

  • @tompalmer5986
    @tompalmer5986 2 года назад +5

    The M113 would probably still be good for ferrying ammunition and other supplies where they are needed. If they're going to be used as ambulances they need to work out some kind of stretcher system in it to keep the wounded soldiers from getting bounced around. I'd like to see the mortar carrying function of the M113's greatly enhanced.

  • @user-gr4sq3lo6n
    @user-gr4sq3lo6n Год назад

    The anguished scream you just heard is Sparky getting the news

  • @cavscout19m203a1
    @cavscout19m203a1 10 лет назад +13

    Thanks too to the workers who designed and fabricated this (now) historical vehicle. It was an honor driving it. I saw a sergeant have the TC hatch slam down on his CVC helmet while mobile because he neglected to insert the retaining pin. He nearly bit both of his lips off and had to be medivaced out. Yeah, his new nick name was 'lips' after that. Scary driving it in the water (with the skirts on of course) because it sank so deep, the water line was just inches away from the top. It didn't have the boat shaped hull that our friends in the Warsaw Pact had with their BMP, but it got the job done. A filtration system for when it was buttoned up in an NBC environment would have been an improvement. I guess in actuality, in an NBC environment, nothing would have mattered, but of course we trained constantly for that scenario. Other than that, it was a great platform.

    • @hihihui1
      @hihihui1 5 лет назад

      dashrath rathdash there is nothing great about this metal piece of shot of a box.

    • @kahirmuzzil7397
      @kahirmuzzil7397 4 года назад

      This happened to me with my soft cap while at a wash point heading Back stateside...

    • @kahirmuzzil7397
      @kahirmuzzil7397 4 года назад

      Left side of my neck swelled like a grapefruit

    • @bendgeddes
      @bendgeddes 2 года назад

      There’s a filter system on the cargo hatch that’s supposed to be an NBC filter. Probably more for morale than NBC. It was usually clogged with dust too.

  • @stumpynubs5387
    @stumpynubs5387 Год назад +1

    Bad arse for their time. 1ST Cav, 1982

  • @pm-vu8vk
    @pm-vu8vk 7 лет назад +7

    I drove an M113A1 from May 1973 to July 1974. A Troop 1/3 ACR Ft. Bliss Texas. The 3Rd CAV is now a Stryker Regiment at Hood.

    • @Jon-mf8ku
      @Jon-mf8ku 6 лет назад +1

      Scouts out my friend. L troop 3/3 ACR Ft. Bliss from 1976 to 1979. Sheridan crew member. Each platoon had 3 Sheridans, 4 M113's and 3 M114's.

    • @prizmm
      @prizmm 6 лет назад

      Drove M113 , Ft Bliss,, 3`RD ACR,,43`RD Engr Comp.,, 2`nd plt, I`st squad,,1976-1978,,time of my life !! `` Brave Rifles !! ``,,,,S~

  • @RJM1011
    @RJM1011 5 лет назад +2

    They look GREAT thank you for the video.

  • @paullamont65
    @paullamont65 9 лет назад +4

    Luv the 113, spent way to much time in 577 too. Great set of wheels to go mud hoggin in when i was in 5th ID (mech). COLD STEEL BDE.

  • @courage73
    @courage73 11 лет назад +1

    Well done BAE. Always good to plaster our protected lift capability all over the NET. I guess that's one less secret we need to keep from Indonesia!

  • @BIGWILLYAUS
    @BIGWILLYAUS 7 лет назад +2

    good fun ride

  • @barrygiddey9139
    @barrygiddey9139 Год назад

    Well done everyone

  • @aaronsauer6628
    @aaronsauer6628 2 года назад +1

    great job guys can any one tell me what power pack they are running now im sure the v8 and the gm diesel 6 are long gone

  • @Trey_816
    @Trey_816 3 года назад

    It is small, but mighty

  • @gianpaolovillani6321
    @gianpaolovillani6321 3 года назад +2

    Beautiful military vehicle, I want it to be back in operation for many more decades and never need to be replaced by the useless omfv.

    • @philchristmas4071
      @philchristmas4071 10 месяцев назад

      The new omfv is much more survivable than the M113. It seems you would want better equipment for our soldiers, so they have a better chance of returning home to their families.

  • @1moderntalking1
    @1moderntalking1 5 лет назад

    outstanding! best m113 in the world. Keep trying in your strykers usa.

    • @jimbotheassclown
      @jimbotheassclown 5 лет назад +1

      LoL the 113's are a death trap on the modern battlefield but ok.

  • @timneaves519
    @timneaves519 9 лет назад +1

    had another look at the pics ,they removed the bilge pump hole on the drivers side ,looks like no more swimming

  • @chrismiller9264
    @chrismiller9264 4 года назад +1

    I probably painted at least one of those when we built them in Santa Clara.

  • @Veldtian1
    @Veldtian1 7 лет назад +8

    'Upgraded' with a 50. cal pop gun, in a manned turret no less..?? Minimum 20mm just to stay on par with the Warsaw pact equivalent 23mm, the politicians probably thought it would look too scary lol.

    • @jamescox6630
      @jamescox6630 5 лет назад

      Veldtia

    • @Reddsoldier
      @Reddsoldier 5 лет назад +1

      A .50 is more than enough to mess up a BMP's day. They may have had the cannon, but they also had their troops sitting on fuel tanks with the earlier BMP-1 having them as rear doors!!

  • @Veldtian1
    @Veldtian1 5 лет назад +3

    You forgot to build 40 Gavin STUG variants.

  • @randymagnum143
    @randymagnum143 3 года назад

    What are the new engines, and why are they so much trouble? Or is it the transmissions?

  • @mwnciboo
    @mwnciboo 4 года назад +2

    It so cool that old kit gets taken apart blasted, then new parts put on and modernised. Why buy new?

  • @rafiqkatana
    @rafiqkatana 7 лет назад +1

    Add to Block List because of long advert at beginning that cant be skipped.

    • @willm687
      @willm687 6 лет назад +1

      use ad block

  • @telesniper2
    @telesniper2 Год назад

    I still say they need a variant with an M134 with CROWS mount and most of the space inside taken up by a giant magazine. I bet you could fit at least 30 or 40 thousand rounds easy

  • @pickinthatbanjo
    @pickinthatbanjo Год назад +1

    The MTLB of the west, a real workhorse that one is.

  • @knessing7681
    @knessing7681 2 года назад

    It's a tight fit (interior) ... another feet of head clearance would be so luxurious.

  • @chaoli9844
    @chaoli9844 10 лет назад +32

    Wish I could buy one of these unarmed no turrents for civilian use.

    • @MineGames131
      @MineGames131 8 лет назад +8

      I'd turn it into a half camper and half apocalypse vehicle.

    • @joseftrumpeldor6240
      @joseftrumpeldor6240 7 лет назад +10

      You can. Israel is selling off many of it's Zeldas; they are the largest user in the world of the M-113.

    • @mattyt7528
      @mattyt7528 6 лет назад

      if you have a farm it's easy!

    • @zepter00
      @zepter00 6 лет назад +1

      Since t has rubber pads on tracks you can use it on public, tarmac roads.

    • @markfryer9880
      @markfryer9880 5 лет назад +1

      They make a hell of a racket when on a road run. Had two drive past me years ago, I could hear them coming and wondered what the noise was.

  • @timneaves519
    @timneaves519 9 лет назад +1

    are they not amphibious any more ,cause the side skirts were removed and the wade board on the front removed

  • @mottthehoople693
    @mottthehoople693 5 лет назад +1

    as I recall john howard must be frightened of us civvies as he stopped the adf from selling them here

  • @patallen5095
    @patallen5095 4 года назад

    Just wondering if it would have been better to spend the money on newer, better protected armoured vehicle?

  • @jheuver5272
    @jheuver5272 Год назад

    M113 A1 is an front taxi !!!

  • @bradcampbell7253
    @bradcampbell7253 6 лет назад +1

    some of the best equipment the Australian armed forces have ever had awesome

  • @Sjadow75
    @Sjadow75 8 лет назад +2

    This upgrade was talked about when i was in 5/7 rar (mech) in the early 90s …the problem with the adf is by the time canberra pulls their finger out the bullshit red tape,paper work, sum civi saying weathr its a good idea or not 20 years has gone by and the on line battallions finally get them and its 20years to old. When will people in high places learn?? Providing adf personnel with the best equipment is a priority …same old story

    • @willm687
      @willm687 6 лет назад

      same with browning hi power adf won't change it or upgrade it. why not get Lithgow/thales to modify the BHP to modern specs meaning no need to change calibers or magazines.

  • @walangpera2103
    @walangpera2103 2 года назад +1

    The M113 is very popular battle tank and many countrys are totally use it in war and same M 113 are upgraded for,,!!🤔?? me the m 113 is good conditions and buy old battle tank

  • @rsm93
    @rsm93 9 лет назад

    drove one from 84 to88 in germany with the 8th inf loved those detroit deisls11111111111

    • @stefanlyon2719
      @stefanlyon2719 9 лет назад

      but hated the rough ride and cramped spaces yeah?

  • @rinsedpie
    @rinsedpie 4 года назад +1

    Wonder what it feels like to be in one

    • @imbetterthanyouis
      @imbetterthanyouis 4 года назад

      fun

    • @rinsedpie
      @rinsedpie 4 года назад +1

      @@imbetterthanyouis but you will be knocked about.

    • @imbetterthanyouis
      @imbetterthanyouis 4 года назад +1

      @@rinsedpie depends on terrain and speed and how batshit crazy your driver is

    • @rinsedpie
      @rinsedpie 4 года назад

      @@imbetterthanyouis there was a show and the best vehicle in it was a crummy old jeep and nothing else. Not even a single half track. But i so much want to be in that jeep; my dad was in the british army.

    • @imbetterthanyouis
      @imbetterthanyouis 4 года назад

      @@rinsedpie theres a guy who works fot wargaming they do world of tanks and world of warships called the chieftain , he did a video about how the sherman was the best tank in ww2 and its a very valid argument and yeah a similar thing can be applied to the willis jeep , they were never designed to last more than 6 months and they did everything they were asked to do and there wasnt much they couldnt do with in reason , personally im a landrover guy but yeah a willis jeep militarily is the standard you have to meet even now days

  • @puravida5683
    @puravida5683 3 года назад +3

    Had an M113 for military police convoy escort in Vietnam. The fuel tanks on the sides of the aluminum alloy, made men burn paranoid, if an RPG or 50 cal. Round hit. Anything more than 7.62mm rounds, kiss your behind goodbye!
    I preferred the M114, with mounted 50 cal. and M60 mg., manufactured by Cadillac. Small, fast, and had a 160 hp gasoline Chevrolet V8.

    • @375GTB
      @375GTB 2 года назад

      The 21st century bed frame grates stop RPG's!
      Added light weight composite armor plates stop AP rounds up to 23mm.
      30mm if at an angle....
      No longer our old tin cans...
      Upgrade your knowledge base, old timer!
      Age 72
      Here
      1-A/4-F 7-25-'67
      Motorcycle event....
      My 18th Birthday...
      No 'Nam
      But no
      Naples, NAVY opticians mate
      No Ramstein, USAF Airman Armorer...
      MY chosen billets
      IF!
      Born mechanic!
      97.3rd percentile tests at JAX NAS summer 1966...
      Age 17...
      Wanted by my Tampa recruiters...
      SAVED by a JAX NAS Medic....1969....
      Who had been there...
      KEEP my bad knee
      My Deferment.... after 1-Y...
      BEST advice I ever had.
      J.C.

  • @kuno7636
    @kuno7636 7 лет назад

    Rip Bottom Feeder

  • @stormlah
    @stormlah 2 года назад

    50 years later australia gets an upgrade hahahahah

  • @slaviero.
    @slaviero. Год назад

    Large vehicle, and little electronics. why? What isn't there, doesn't break.......

  • @fernandoodasilva7508
    @fernandoodasilva7508 6 лет назад

    Se os carros fabricados no Brasil e melhor para que comprar dos EUA,alguem esta ganhando comicao para isso.

  • @bestestusername
    @bestestusername 6 лет назад +1

    Nothing is the best for current threats, some cage or modular armour and these are ok heck even the yanks still use them

    • @jimbotheassclown
      @jimbotheassclown 5 лет назад

      Not really the National guard still have them but don't deploy them when their Called up for deployment because their slow loud and Death traps on the modern battlefield M113's and the Bradley for the most part are only still around because the State guard units get more federal money for maintenance on tracked Vehicles than Strykers. The Army tried to give the Washington state National guard Strykers but the governor said no because they'd lose money for maintenance.The Bradley is still relevant But getting long in the tooth the 113 not so much.

  • @evanf111og
    @evanf111og 3 года назад

    the BEST IFV ever built

  • @justgjt
    @justgjt 5 лет назад +1

    Didn't realise they were made from recycles coke cans.

  • @miguelangelirala5664
    @miguelangelirala5664 4 года назад

    SAYMAR Ltd. (www.saymar.co.il) ha desarrollado un kit de actualización para AML-90 tipo 256, 246 y ELAND, que mejora las capacidades del vehículo, extiende la vida operativa del vehículo y permite el uso extendido de una flota existente entre otros vehículos militares de última generación. El kit de actualización incluye la sustitución del motor original por un motor TOYOTA Diesel 2L más potente, un sistema eléctrico nuevo y modernizado, un nuevo sistema de frenado, una nueva dirección asistida hidráulica, un nuevo sistema de iluminación y mucho más. SAYMAR Ltd. tiene los conocimientos de ingeniería y las capacidades industriales y logísticas para realizar dicho programa de actualización en su propia planta o en las instalaciones del cliente.

  • @ooopsyantsoshadrytv-2911
    @ooopsyantsoshadrytv-2911 5 лет назад

    🇦🇺😍😍😍😍😍😎

  • @brucelamberton8819
    @brucelamberton8819 5 лет назад +15

    BAE Systems - exploiting governments with over-budget, late-delivered projects across the globe

    • @alexlanning712
      @alexlanning712 3 года назад

      Whats new? with any defence contractor

  • @ramairgto72
    @ramairgto72 8 лет назад

    Bean Spray Pump Company

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 9 лет назад

    '
    BAE arms body both side need to add THICK HULL, front / rear strong HULL, top turret HULL, bottom HULL

    • @obfuscated3090
      @obfuscated3090 9 лет назад +2

      No, they don't, because not all warfare is slugging matches on open desert or being a gallery target for IEDs. If you add too much armor because you fear a hull loss, you can't carry FIREPOWER to the fight and your naked (relatively speaking) infantry will die.
      M113 can operate where nothing else can go, where an Abrams would sink or a wheeled armored MRAP or Stryker would get stuck.
      BTW M113 is ideal for modular removable armors such as those used in the US uparmored versions which offer as much protection as the larger Bradley in plate thickness. They can also be fitted with adjustable Davis external road arm suspension and the space filled now with torsion bars used for floor armor if desired. US firms want to sell new vehicles so congrats to Australia for keeping a format which is ideal for their use. You can't run an Abrams or Namer through soft jungle and littoral terrain and a stuck vehicle is useless.

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 9 лет назад

      thank explain information.
      dont use 2 words YOU / YOUR on me.
      let explain about this armor vehicle.
      who is a word -- THEY --

  • @markleavey1
    @markleavey1 4 года назад

    i wouldnt want to be in it in modern battle come on get reall governments cheaping out on there fucking shit

    • @markleavey1
      @markleavey1 4 года назад

      its old but certain terrain its valuable

  • @jimwatts7489
    @jimwatts7489 5 лет назад +2

    SO what were the upgrades?!?!!?!? Waste of time watching this video, it shows nothing and tells your nothing. I was hope to here that they had been up armoured all the way around. When I was riding in them in the US Army a 30 cal round would cut through them and there was nothing to deal with anti-armour mines that were run over. You run over a mine most every time everyone was dead. If you got hit with a RPG it was rare for more than two out of 10 would survive. Maybe they are selling them to the Philippines they could use them over there combating their terrorist problems. THey could swim from Island to Island.
    .

    • @kalapuikko666
      @kalapuikko666 5 лет назад

      @@TheEwanMC Thanks for the answer!

    • @maruph3555
      @maruph3555 4 года назад

      Jim Watts One M113 of the Philippine Army has been destroyed by a homemade RPG, these are death traps without armor upgrade.

  • @375GTB
    @375GTB 2 года назад

    CORRECTION!
    Still in production by BAE today.
    New upgraded replacements for those we are sending to Ukraine!
    SLAVA UKRAINI
    J.C.

  • @wattcy89
    @wattcy89 8 лет назад +5

    Too bad they are obsolete. a bushmaster makes a better battle taxi 90% of the time and as a IFV, well its just not one of them.

    • @aidanmcbeath1316
      @aidanmcbeath1316 7 лет назад +5

      +Andy Wilderness yes they fucking are, they are 50 year old tin cans that can't even survive an ied blast.

    • @wattcy89
      @wattcy89 7 лет назад +4

      If you want to be cruel, its been obsolete since the 80's when our contemporaries started fielding Bradleys and Warriors for infantry support/transport but its definitely been obsolete since 2003 and the lessons learnt in the war on terror. The proofs in the pudding that no Australian m113 got deployed to the MEAO during the 10 years we were there. It will never be deployed to a warlike zone again instead remain in Australia till retirement or be used in a timor like conflict.It is an significant upgrade and a very good one, but its uncompetitive against modern IFV like the CV90

    • @LiveMusicOntario
      @LiveMusicOntario 6 лет назад

      Probably correct. Time moves on so I'd hope more modern eqpt. is an improvement in function. But can those IFVs hold a "wheelie" on the back 1/4 of the tracks for a while after broaching a crest in the road? There has to be a coolness factor to that.

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 6 лет назад +2

      Certainly not obsolete, it just doesn´t hold against modern threats but is porposes was troop taxi in conventional wars not urban or insurgent wars like in Iraq or Afghanistan

    • @kalapuikko666
      @kalapuikko666 5 лет назад +2

      @@wattcy89 IFV's cost millions whereas a m113 fully rebuilt and modernized is hundred(s) thousand. No reason to buy IFV for APC role.

  • @kalapuikko666
    @kalapuikko666 5 лет назад

    Western equivalent for Mtlb.

  • @brucemackinnon6707
    @brucemackinnon6707 2 года назад

    RPG and ATGM. These are the killers of any such vehicle. They are cheap and in the case of RPG plentiful. How deal with them? Otherwise they are cooked sardines.

  • @AlexandrNazarenkoSunchoz
    @AlexandrNazarenkoSunchoz Год назад +2

    Передайте Україні!

  • @mattyt7528
    @mattyt7528 6 лет назад

    These are no good for the current threats out there now.

    • @kalapuikko666
      @kalapuikko666 5 лет назад +1

      These are designed for war, not for patrolling in Afganistan.

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 8 месяцев назад

      Neither are Bradley’s

  • @markjmaxwell9819
    @markjmaxwell9819 5 лет назад

    A piece of crap compared to a modern IFV.
    They were not very good when introduced.
    Even with upgrades still shit.