Was in the Cavalry as a driver in Aussie Army (Reserves). Loved the old M113A1 to bits. Ended up as a Crew Commander in the "Buckets" as they were commonly known. Still look back & think of those years driving the M113's as some of my fondest years in the Cav. ...Definitely more fun Driving, than commanding.
Mentira isso aí é Tecnologia Inovadora dá Turquia M.113 é uns dos Melhores Tanques Blindados do Planeta senão uns dos Melhores Tanques Blindados do Mundo!!.......
Got badly hurt when sniper shot driver, APC went out of control and rolled over. We were sitting on top and dove inside. The weakest point of the 113 is the underbelly. A land mine would kill everyone inside so everyone always rode on top. That’s why you always see people on top when you see videos or pictures of 113’s in combat. I hope they strengthen the underneath.
Scovserb curmudgeon, so you think that Craig Smith is lying about the vulnerabilities of the M113? It’s history goes pre-Vietnam usage by the US and it has always been a mine blast victim. Name troops who were mechanized habitually rode on top due to a weak belly. Also the early ones were gasoline powered rather the later diesel ones, and always burned to the ground when hit by a RPG. It’s aluminum armor would melt into a huge molten pool.
In Switzerland we were one of the first countries to have bought the M113,1380, in all. Edit by our tank factories in Thun, already to make them more reliable, and more draw, but it's a real sink! In the year 2000 we use them as a training target. So for 10 years we have changed to buy CV90 Swedish, really great troop transport, very reliable, and switchable in different versions!
@@EvMstein there's been about 80,000 M113's built in all variants in several countries compared to about 49,000 of all variants of the BMP-1 built in several countries so...
@@EvMstein Maybe the M113 should be the FN FAL of APCs since it seems to equip most of the free world like the FAL, and is just as long lived and dependable.
Needed updating. Good and dependable. Had an 2Lt. Constantly bringing his track in bitching about performance. Told him to get in. Took it out on drivers testing course. Max safe speed for course was 25 mph. I ran it at about 35 to 40 mph. With all the wild curves, dips and drops I could hear him through my headset screaming hysterically. At the end of the course I pulled back as quick and hard as I could almost standing that bad boy on its nose. I know he crapped himself. He went to the First Sargent complaining, I got called in . Being Top knew I can't stand bullshit he glazed over my collection of DD 2404's and log books on the vehicle. He winked at me and replied " Well sir, after all these complaints I see his team did a hell of a job properly repairing your vehicle. There was never nothing wrong with it. He was a back seat driver who constantly pissed his driver off who in turn did everything possible to avoid having to tote this butter bar around. This Lt. was transferred to the Redeye platoon where he complained about his jeep. So, we kept it on constant deadline status and he was stuck riding in a truck while we had the luxury of using his jeep to buzz about the field and base. Moral of the story is you don't screw with your maintenance team they can make your life miserable. Oh and after they started putting M151A2's with that antipollution bullshit in use they ruined a fine lightweight vehicle. Out of all the vehicle types I had driven the M113 was the most fun to drive.
I had one , it came. With a plt ldr E-7 , I slid mine sideways once on a wet German road , accidentally .it was the command track for a mortar unit ,infantry
@Adecodoo The whole battle taxi concept never worked out as mechanized infantry would prefer better armed and armored vehicles. Troops would rather sit on top and then sandbag the hell out of the insides for fear of mines. So much for shrapnel and small arms protection. So for carrying infantry it's both outclassed by IFVs in a conventional war and by MRAPs in an asymmetrical one. But it's so versatile that countries with limited defense budgets could always get good value out.
@Adecodoo It didn't work out for the M113. The fact that they had to develop IFVs for conventional warfare means mech inf would much rather have that. The Bradley was the replacement for the M113 for mech inf. In that case it's not apples and oranges. The M113 couldn't keep up with armor nor was it protective enough. The whole APC concept lost out on IFVs. Newer APCs they just make them wheeled and thinly armored. They're clearly not designed to accompany main battle tanks. "Moving men around in a safe zone" is not "battle taxi", it's just "taxi". The M113 is still used world wide because it's cheap and versatile, not because it's actually good at anything. Troops hate how it's a coffin on tracks. And sending men to their deaths to save a few bucks is not acceptable in modern day political climate.
@Adecodoo It's biggest strength is also its biggest weakness, being a pretty bad jack of all trades. Many troops would prefer not riding in this aluminum coffin at all, walking and sitting on top of a heavily sandbagged one was indeed safer. Mech Inf's job is to keep up with armored thrusts. An APC can't do that because of lack of protection and in the case of the m113 horsepower as well. Cost is not a reasonable excuse in today's political climate. It's obsolete the moment better vehicles were designed to fill specific roles. It has no place in a well equipped modern military. www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2016/JAN_MAR/1Nuckols-Cameron16.pdf It's even a liability today in other utility niches. It's all cool on paper when you say you're not gonna get shot at. But the enemy has a vote. Israeli troops flat out refused to enter the Gaza in the m113 after a bunch of them got killed in one. You seem to judge that thing on the conventional war in europe that never happened. I judge it on Vietnam and the Middle East. Get this thing out of service ASAP!
I used the last iteration of the 113 before we transitioned to Bradley’s. It was reliable relatively comfortable and easy in and out and ..... it never threw a track. [edit] well of course it could throw a track, but not like the bradly.
WHAT? I was a track vehicle mechanic in the 1980's. I remember replacing tracks. Comfortable my @$$.. I guess if you only used it on road. But we used to try to tear them up. At Ft. Benning. But in WEST GERMANY I went to an ADA unit. We drove them a long way. But seldom off road. Oh the memories.
Spent many years in the M-106 variant of the M-113. The M-106 was the mortar carriers for the M-30, 4.2-inch mortar. I am sure that the entire vehicle will get many improvements and upgrades. Hope they really change to a track assembly that won't break as easily. Please make a better crew heater. Was constantly repairing those heaters. They were overly complicated diesel fuel burning heaters. Worked great if they worked. Trouble was they broke when you needed them the most.
By the personel heater? Yah me to. 20 degrees below zero that night in Germany and I was soaked in Diesel fuel from that Personnel heater that wasn't working. Driver had tried to fix it and didn't turn the cutoff knob to off. Thought I was gunna die I was so damn cold.
@@nunyabeeswax2638 Ya my experience was it was below freezing, but the personal heater worked to well. When the ramp dropped and we debused, the cold was a bit noticeable for awhile.
Hm. Vaguely looks like the YPR that we had in the 1970s and 1980s. Except that we had a turret with a 25mm Oerlikon and a 7.62 coax on it. Noisy bugger of a thing, but it did what you asked of it; proper transportation, decent shelter and effective fire support when needed.
Because it's available in large numbers and is sustainable and easy to maintain by Iraqi, Kuwaiti and Saudi Police Forces. Another reason is they cannot blow them up on gunnery ranges because they are mostly aluminum and being non-magnetic it is against Range cleanup policy. Bottom line ...it's less expensive as the vehicles are paid off.
The 113 was always a great wepons platform, and troop mover, but I dont understand all the refurbishing going on with older vehicles. If you really wanted to upgrade, add an 8' section, like they did with the C141, increased payload.
bought and paid for, far cheaper to modernize than purchase new. These were bought for pennies on the dollar and plentiful US military assistance programs. Canada left all theirs is Europe and UK to sell rather than ship back
Aussies upgraded about 350 of their 700 x M113A1's into M113AS4 variant. Stretched the hull by cutting & inserting a 26" section & thereby allowed them to add an extra road wheel each side. The upgraded also included a new Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain & Steering system... amongst the many improvements. Fuel cells also moved to outside. Went from a 1 man Manual turret to a 1 Man Electric turret with a 50cal QCB M2.
I use to drive one of these in the army and let me tell you the best upgrade for these would be to just get rid of them and replace them with Bradly's or Strikers
This M 113 is the Old Cargo Tank in WW2 and Veatnan war also ,,!! But very Popular tank in Asia ,,!! This is the reason the M113 is Up graded now to be come M113 -A1
M981 fistv sucked so bad. Turret for forward observer equipment and 4 antennas. Bullet catchers. We couldn't keep up with tanks and Bradley's. Glad they have better fist vehicles now
Not having the swim accessories serviceable is a deadline offense. Yes, they all even came with a bilge pump. And they can climb the shit out of a grade, too
Muy bueno eo video. Esto es lo que tenìa que hacer el ejército español..la dotacion de M113 es muy importante..de verdad que con el bajo presupuesto en defensa se España y con lo que cuesta un vehìculo nuevo como el Toro , no se pueden modernizar??, no lo entiendo ..Israel los ha modenizado y los sigue utilizando..no en primera línea pero si como ambulancia, puesto de mando..comunicaciones..vigilancia de bases..no hay mucho sentido comun entre la alta oficialidad española..tambien Canadá y Australia los ha modernizado..HAY QUE APRENDER!!!!!!
M113 zırhlı lastik paletli araç üzerine a4a4 zırhlı kulesi 130mm tank topu zırhlı kulesi entegre ettim etkili mevzil 9km azmi mevzil 19km zırhlı kulesi 30mm 3namlulu makineli topu entegre ettim 300kw lazer topu entegre ettim kulesi iki yanına omtas tank savar füze savunma sistemi entegre elektromanyetik atış sistemi entegre ettim atış yapıldığı zaman 500km atış yapıyor tamamen kendi kendine hedef bulup atış yapıyor hareket sahası 5000km tamamen kendi kendine hareket ediyor toplam ağırlık 25ton insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
Neden biz geri kalmışız diye sorup duruyorlar. Soracaklarına biraz defter, kitap okusalar iş kendiliğinden çözülecek sanırdık eskiden ama öyle olamayacağı şu dumur eden yorum ile insanın yüzüne şamar gibi çarpıyor. Videodaki üretim tesisi FNSS'nin BAE'ndeki ortak girişimine ait. TAI yada diğer adı TAI ilk kurulduğunda da (1984) ABD'li General Electric ile ortak kurulmuş, fabrika duvarlarındaki yazılar da Türkçe idi. Hiç bir amerikalı da çıkıp; "Neden bazı ayerlerde Türkçe yazıyor" diye zırıldamadı. Yazının şekli şemali üretim tesisi hakkında öyle sizin zırvaladığınız gibi kesin bilgiler içermez. BAE'nde, BAE'li bir firma aile ortak üretim tesisi kurmuş iseniz, neden fabrikanın duvarında Arapça yazılar var diye zırlamanın da bir alemi yok. Ne yani, Çince mi yazacaklardı fabrika duvarlarına ? "Tank- palet fabrikasının satılması" martavalınızda ayrı bir hikâye. Satılan bir şey ortada yok. Üzerinize oturduğunuz o koca organelinizi büyüteceğinize azıcık kafa çalıştırıp, birazda "gerçekler nedir" acaba diye merak ederek, "gerçek" bilgileri verenleri takip etseydiniz, Tank-palet fabrikasının ARAPLARA değil, bir Türk firması/markası olan BMC'ye, 25 yıllığına, SATILMADIĞINI, kiralandığını çözebilirdiniz (BMC şirket hisselerinin %25.1’i Öztürk Ailesi’nin; %25’i Ethem Sancak’ın; geriye kalan %49.9’u ise Katar Silahlı Kuvvetlerinin). TAI'ninde %46.2'si ABD'li General Electric'e ait, yakında adı MİLLİ MUHARİP UÇAK olan kendi uçağımızı yapacaklar, o zamanda çıkıp zırıldanacak mısınız merak ederiz. Adında olduğu gibi asıl görevi Tank-Palet üretmek olan fabrikanın bu güne kadar hiç bir tank üretmediğini bilseydiniz (hazır parçaları alıp birleştirmek tank üretmek değildir, öyle saçmalıkları umarım buraya cevap olarak girmezsiniz), BMC'ye yapılan kiralama ile buraya gerçek manada bir TANK ÜRETİM hattının kurulacağını, 25 Yıllık kiralama sonunda da, bu GERÇEK TANK ÜRETİM hattının bedava olarak T.C Devletine kalacağınıda bilebilirdiniz. T.C Devletinin acil olarak bir ana muharebe tankına ihtiyacı var, ancak devlet bütçesinin böyle bir ihtiyaca yönelik yatırımı yapabilecek maddi olanakları kısıtlı. Parası yok değil, kısıtlı. Buraya böylesine bir yatırım yapılsa bu defa başka elzem bir savunma sanayii ihtiyacını karşılayamayacak. Misal, TFX uçağına para ayıramayacak. Ayrıca devletin kurduğu fabrikalarda çalışanların %99,999'u amiyane tabiri ile torpil vasıtası işe girer, işe girince yan gelip yatar, 82 milyonun parasını hortumlar, hiç bir icraatte bulunmaz. Çok merak ediyorsanız bakın bakalım bu güne kadar kurulmuş hangi devlet kurumu bir icatta bulunmuş, memleketin hangi derdine bir derman geliştirmiş, bize nasıl milyarlarca gelir getirmiş. Bulursanız bizimle de paylaşın cehaletimiz gitsin biraz.
Esto no es un tanque! Para ser un tanque tiene que tener un canon para atacar tanques. El proposito era transportar soldados que acompanan los tanques en un ataque. Por eso se llama "Armored Personnel Carrier," or APV.
Was in the Cavalry as a driver in Aussie Army (Reserves). Loved the old M113A1 to bits. Ended up as a Crew Commander in the "Buckets" as they were commonly known.
Still look back & think of those years driving the M113's as some of my fondest years in the Cav.
...Definitely more fun Driving, than commanding.
@MR WHITE ..Hi Ya. Funny thing...I was actually in 3rd/9th SAMR for 7 years (93-2000), then moved West (Perth) & hooked up with 10LH. Cheers
@MR WHITE ..Good stuff mate.
As the saying goes...."It's a Small World" !
Tell details
Mentira isso aí é Tecnologia Inovadora dá Turquia M.113 é uns dos Melhores Tanques Blindados do Planeta senão uns dos Melhores Tanques Blindados do Mundo!!.......
I used to fix them. And it floats.
Got badly hurt when sniper shot driver, APC went out of control and rolled over. We were sitting on top and dove inside. The weakest point of the 113 is the underbelly. A land mine would kill everyone inside so everyone always rode on top. That’s why you always see people on top when you see videos or pictures of 113’s in combat. I hope they strengthen the underneath.
Craig Smith liar.
Basically BTR-60 but worse.
Scovserb curmudgeon, so you think that Craig Smith is lying about the vulnerabilities of the M113? It’s history goes pre-Vietnam usage by the US and it has always been a mine blast victim. Name troops who were mechanized habitually rode on top due to a weak belly. Also the early ones were gasoline powered rather the later diesel ones, and always burned to the ground when hit by a RPG. It’s aluminum armor would melt into a huge molten pool.
John Mead no, I agree that the 113 ain't all that. What I don't believe is his story.
In Switzerland we were one of the first countries to have bought the M113,1380, in all. Edit by our tank factories in Thun, already to make them more reliable, and more draw, but it's a real sink! In the year 2000 we use them as a training target. So for 10 years we have changed to buy CV90 Swedish, really great troop transport, very reliable, and switchable in different versions!
Great video! I used to drive the 113 when I was stationed in West Germany, 3rd, Armored Div, before we got Bradelys.
Spearhead!
The M113 is like the AK47 of APCs.
Hmm.. more like BMP-1 for me.
And M113 is M16A1/A2
@@EvMstein there's been about 80,000 M113's built in all variants in several countries compared to about 49,000 of all variants of the BMP-1 built in several countries so...
@@michaeltubbs4606 You know.. like Western tanks for Western guns and Eastern tanks for Eastern guns.
@@EvMstein got it.
@@EvMstein Maybe the M113 should be the FN FAL of APCs since it seems to equip most of the free world like the FAL, and is just as long lived and dependable.
Удачная конструкция, сколько лет уже в строю, и будит еще не меньше. Я считаю классный аппарат.
Needed updating. Good and dependable. Had an 2Lt. Constantly bringing his track in bitching about performance. Told him to get in. Took it out on drivers testing course. Max safe speed for course was 25 mph. I ran it at about 35 to 40 mph. With all the wild curves, dips and drops I could hear him through my headset screaming hysterically. At the end of the course I pulled back as quick and hard as I could almost standing that bad boy on its nose. I know he crapped himself. He went to the First Sargent complaining, I got called in . Being Top knew I can't stand bullshit he glazed over my collection of DD 2404's and log books on the vehicle. He winked at me and replied " Well sir, after all these complaints I see his team did a hell of a job properly repairing your vehicle. There was never nothing wrong with it. He was a back seat driver who constantly pissed his driver off who in turn did everything possible to avoid having to tote this butter bar around. This Lt. was transferred to the Redeye platoon where he complained about his jeep. So, we kept it on constant deadline status and he was stuck riding in a truck while we had the luxury of using his jeep to buzz about the field and base. Moral of the story is you don't screw with your maintenance team they can make your life miserable. Oh and after they started putting M151A2's with that antipollution bullshit in use they ruined a fine lightweight vehicle. Out of all the vehicle types I had driven the M113 was the most fun to drive.
I had one , it came. With a plt ldr E-7 , I slid mine sideways once on a wet German road , accidentally .it was the command track for a mortar unit ,infantry
Lord, your top sgt should have taken that Lt. Under his wing and given him a little counseling. My top did, and it was all good.
The M113 was a mediocre vehicle, but it was mediocre in 100 different roles and configurations.
@Gerd Wiesler And portable toilet.
@Adecodoo The whole battle taxi concept never worked out as mechanized infantry would prefer better armed and armored vehicles. Troops would rather sit on top and then sandbag the hell out of the insides for fear of mines. So much for shrapnel and small arms protection. So for carrying infantry it's both outclassed by IFVs in a conventional war and by MRAPs in an asymmetrical one. But it's so versatile that countries with limited defense budgets could always get good value out.
@Adecodoo It didn't work out for the M113. The fact that they had to develop IFVs for conventional warfare means mech inf would much rather have that. The Bradley was the replacement for the M113 for mech inf. In that case it's not apples and oranges. The M113 couldn't keep up with armor nor was it protective enough. The whole APC concept lost out on IFVs. Newer APCs they just make them wheeled and thinly armored. They're clearly not designed to accompany main battle tanks. "Moving men around in a safe zone" is not "battle taxi", it's just "taxi".
The M113 is still used world wide because it's cheap and versatile, not because it's actually good at anything. Troops hate how it's a coffin on tracks. And sending men to their deaths to save a few bucks is not acceptable in modern day political climate.
@Adecodoo It's biggest strength is also its biggest weakness, being a pretty bad jack of all trades. Many troops would prefer not riding in this aluminum coffin at all, walking and sitting on top of a heavily sandbagged one was indeed safer.
Mech Inf's job is to keep up with armored thrusts. An APC can't do that because of lack of protection and in the case of the m113 horsepower as well. Cost is not a reasonable excuse in today's political climate.
It's obsolete the moment better vehicles were designed to fill specific roles. It has no place in a well equipped modern military.
www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2016/JAN_MAR/1Nuckols-Cameron16.pdf
It's even a liability today in other utility niches. It's all cool on paper when you say you're not gonna get shot at. But the enemy has a vote.
Israeli troops flat out refused to enter the Gaza in the m113 after a bunch of them got killed in one. You seem to judge that thing on the conventional war in europe that never happened. I judge it on Vietnam and the Middle East. Get this thing out of service ASAP!
@Adecodoo the m113 is no longer in use as an APC, but they're still used in a variety of support roles.
I used the last iteration of the 113 before we transitioned to Bradley’s. It was reliable relatively comfortable and easy in and out and ..... it never threw a track. [edit] well of course it could throw a track, but not like the bradly.
WHAT? I was a track vehicle mechanic in the 1980's. I remember replacing tracks. Comfortable my @$$.. I guess if you only used it on road. But we used to try to tear them up. At Ft. Benning. But in WEST GERMANY I went to an ADA unit. We drove them a long way. But seldom off road. Oh the memories.
@@hiiamrick the Bradley is cramped, zero headroom, and in our brads we still had the seat in the “tunnel.”
@@taggartlawfirm Never been is a Bradley. or a M1 but I do remember the M60.
bradley and m113 have different purposes bradley is a IFV for fighting while m113 is a APC for transportation of supply and troops
Daha fazla ve yeni videoları aylarca beklemedeyiz,umarız bizleri memnun edersiniz,hayırlı ramazanlar 👏🧿👏🧿👏
Adorable Work
Mostly Some Great Improvements
Some Weird Art Designs
Cute Box with curves
Egh lack of Door Improvements
Nice Vibe
Good for transport of troops and support weapons. It's better than walking and it's great to have a .50 cal. ready at hand.
Really enjoyed the footage of the banked track!
Next stop Talladega!
I was a driver of a M113a1 in 1980 1st ID ft Riley KS.
Kinda disappointed the control sticks have been replaced.
Damn after 7 1/2 years of working on them things. They changed up allot!
The M113 still have life in it,just Army leadership lacks innovation in using them as other countries have.
Phnx Snow. No they just keep thinking that congress and the American public is a bottomless pit of money.
If it's American made, it's garbage
Spent many years in the M-106 variant of the M-113. The M-106 was the mortar carriers for the M-30, 4.2-inch mortar.
I am sure that the entire vehicle will get many improvements and upgrades. Hope they really change to a track assembly that won't break as easily.
Please make a better crew heater. Was constantly repairing those heaters. They were overly complicated diesel fuel burning heaters. Worked great if they worked. Trouble was they broke when you needed them the most.
Accurate, I freeze my ass off in these things all the time here at NTC
M981 FISTV here. Sucked to ride below, but fun to drive or tc.
They look damn beautiful! I drove the old A1's and A2's.
It is egypt work ...nice work 🇪🇬🇮🇶
nope, it was modrenized in saudi arabia, see the insignia at 2:07
I made the mistake of sitting way up front, behind the engine compartment once.
By the personel heater? Yah me to. 20 degrees below zero that night in Germany and I was soaked in Diesel fuel from that Personnel heater that wasn't working. Driver had tried to fix it and didn't turn the cutoff knob to off. Thought I was gunna die I was so damn cold.
@@nunyabeeswax2638
Ya my experience was it was below freezing, but the personal heater worked to well. When the ramp dropped and we debused, the cold was a bit noticeable for awhile.
What sort of power pack are you running the ADF is using the same engine as the LAV 25
Молодцы Турки !!! Так держать !
Still fits in its role as APC and not IFV.
Hm. Vaguely looks like the YPR that we had in the 1970s and 1980s. Except that we had a turret with a 25mm Oerlikon and a 7.62 coax on it. Noisy bugger of a thing, but it did what you asked of it; proper transportation, decent shelter and effective fire support when needed.
¡Magnífico trabajo! 👍 👍 👏👏👏,felicitaciones.
MaşaAllah hayırlı olsun Allah razı olsun yapanlardan yaptıranlardan yaşasın Türkiye Yüzyılı 🇹🇷
Because it's available in large numbers and is sustainable and easy to maintain by Iraqi, Kuwaiti and Saudi Police Forces. Another reason is they cannot blow them up on gunnery ranges because they are mostly aluminum and being non-magnetic it is against Range cleanup policy. Bottom line ...it's less expensive as the vehicles are paid off.
My favorite apc...outstanding lil beast!
EEUU modernizando dicho equipo el M113 debería acordarse qué pasó con el mismo en Vietnam en el Líbano qué el RPG7 los destruyó Grabiel Capitan
I didn't know *The Stig* test drives APCs.
Friend Chicken this is thü stög!
Que lindo quedaron son unos capos ojala se buelva a fabricar en fm todos los armamentos
I used to drive one and then was in charge of a three track section. They haven't changed the 113 since the A3 came out.
The M-113 test driven by Top Gears The STIG
Hell yeah. I still dream about an M577 for a bug-out vehicle.
The 113 was always a great wepons platform, and troop mover, but I dont understand all the refurbishing going on with older vehicles. If you really wanted to upgrade, add an 8' section, like they did with the C141, increased payload.
bought and paid for, far cheaper to modernize than purchase new. These were bought for pennies on the dollar and plentiful US military assistance programs. Canada left all theirs is Europe and UK to sell rather than ship back
Aussies upgraded about 350 of their 700 x M113A1's into M113AS4 variant.
Stretched the hull by cutting & inserting a 26" section & thereby allowed them to add an extra road wheel each side. The upgraded also included a new Engine, Transmission, Drivetrain & Steering system... amongst the many improvements.
Fuel cells also moved to outside. Went from a 1 man Manual turret to a 1 Man Electric turret with a 50cal QCB M2.
I use to drive one of these in the army and let me tell you the best upgrade for these would be to just get rid of them and replace them with Bradly's or Strikers
Bradley and Strykers are IFVs. The M113 is an APC. It is being replaced though. Look up the new AMPV
FNSS is the best 😍🇹🇷🇸🇦😍
May all the M113’s be sent to Ukraine to fight the Russians as they were designed for in the early 60’s. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
This M 113 is the Old Cargo Tank in WW2 and Veatnan war also ,,!! But very Popular tank in Asia ,,!! This is the reason the M113 is Up graded now to be come M113 -A1
Ya estoy empezando a amar a la industria militar de Turquía.
Where is this? Somewhere in the Middle East. ?
Turkey. Fnss corporation.
We need a design for the mountain and desert areas.
why? in which country you plan to start your next war? hehe
Inevitable Crafts Lab You think why countries are preparing their armies.
The Stig can drive anything!
2:12 Stig, is that you??
A man who only needs aluminum foil for armor. A man who steers a m113 with his member. A man who needs no introduction.
THE STIG!
So how's the mine protection this time around?
The only M-113's that were worth anything for a scout vehicle were the M-114's.
What did it modernize?
They should do the water test last so it would wash off all the dirt during the test.
Are they welder qualified and certified?
There's something to be said for an AFV that can swim!
Pretty sure it’s a IFV not a AFV
Es una buena opción para los vehículos que tiene el Ejército del Perú
I wait you repare the engine ibside problem, cause im tired with the brrvueeeee briiiu inside i cant suport this noise when i enter down
The Track family the M113, M114 and the M577A1 that I drove from 1966 till 1968. The TC yelled Tanks and the driver replied you're welcome :-)
Rode around on top of one of those Papa Charlies during my time in Vietnam.
i luv what aussies did to m113 by turning it into AS4 stretch!
What country that
I was in the 1stBn28th /24id 1961 Munich when they were first issued in USAREUR
The King of Metal Boxes lives on
M981 fistv sucked so bad. Turret for forward observer equipment and 4 antennas. Bullet catchers. We couldn't keep up with tanks and Bradley's. Glad they have better fist vehicles now
Nice... improved engine and interior... while also making sure the rear hatch isn't a fucking death trap.
Turkey is the best thank to suport Indonesian military industry
this one is modrenized in saudi arabia not turky see the insignia at 2:07
Bu bildiğin ZMA 15 olmuş....
Vamos enclausurar este motor para diminuir o ruido interno.
Can I buy one for my commute?
Wait they made it amphibious as well now?
A. Soldier
Now? They always were
Served with 1/6 INF may of 83 to Aug 85 dam good machine
It's been amphibious..since the beginning!
Not having the swim accessories serviceable is a deadline offense. Yes, they all even came with a bilge pump. And they can climb the shit out of a grade, too
'Look rhinos, rhinos, our enemy hides in metal boxes'. - C. L. Sindrid.
Muy bueno eo video. Esto es lo que tenìa que hacer el ejército español..la dotacion de M113 es muy importante..de verdad que con el bajo presupuesto en defensa se España y con lo que cuesta un vehìculo nuevo como el Toro , no se pueden modernizar??, no lo entiendo ..Israel los ha modenizado y los sigue utilizando..no en primera línea pero si como ambulancia, puesto de mando..comunicaciones..vigilancia de bases..no hay mucho sentido comun entre la alta oficialidad española..tambien Canadá y Australia los ha modernizado..HAY QUE APRENDER!!!!!!
انتبهو بدقيقه 1:04 اكو ارقام عربيه على المدرعه 🤔
التطوير سعودي شوف شعار القوات المسلحة السعودية في الدقيقة 2:07
Modernization must be two times more expensive than a new one. You had better buy a ZMA15
M113 zırhlı lastik paletli araç üzerine a4a4 zırhlı kulesi 130mm tank topu zırhlı kulesi entegre ettim etkili mevzil 9km azmi mevzil 19km zırhlı kulesi 30mm 3namlulu makineli topu entegre ettim 300kw lazer topu entegre ettim kulesi iki yanına omtas tank savar füze savunma sistemi entegre elektromanyetik atış sistemi entegre ettim atış yapıldığı zaman 500km atış yapıyor tamamen kendi kendine hedef bulup atış yapıyor hareket sahası 5000km tamamen kendi kendine hareket ediyor toplam ağırlık 25ton insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
It's too old now, even after upgrades it's not of this time anymore.
It might make a good Police Swat vehicle,....but it has no place on the Battlefield anymore.
@Hunk y I know,....scary s**t right.
Like driving in your own coffin,...Yikes 😲⁉
@@thatdutchguy2882 they have mraps, and Bearcats. LoL👍
@@supercarakita945 Nothing a ATGM can't solve, just look at the Saudi Jemeni conflict, ....Yikes 😲 ⁉
The US Army is replacing them with the AMPV
The Browns update ancient white tech...... for some reason
Beste of TURKİYE🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
jump 1:08 and look warning label.the is arabic language. what for ?
it was modrenized in saudi arabia, see the insignia at 2:07
Chile fue el primer usuario en América
Best APC ever.
good joke
Not at all.
I speak from experience.
oldschoolgreentube
Then you know about the thin floors and crappy aluminum armor? But against an old BMP? Hell ya! M113 all the way
A fine track.
O quebra ondas ficou muito abaixo de linha da água.
PERÚ está haciendo lo suyo
The M132 version is hardly missed.
Zippo
Drove an M-113 from '87-'93
That thing was a jalopy compared to this!
Swim 1981 with the M113 in the River Lahn, Germany. Like a mississippi strammer
neden bazı yerlerde arapça yazıyor??
duvarlarda arapça yazıyordu fabrika da, üretim yerleride araplara ait o ozaman. geçen günlerde tank palet fabrikasınnı araplara satılması gibi..
Neden biz geri kalmışız diye sorup duruyorlar. Soracaklarına biraz defter, kitap okusalar iş kendiliğinden çözülecek sanırdık eskiden ama öyle olamayacağı şu dumur eden yorum ile insanın yüzüne şamar gibi çarpıyor.
Videodaki üretim tesisi FNSS'nin BAE'ndeki ortak girişimine ait. TAI yada diğer adı TAI ilk kurulduğunda da (1984) ABD'li General Electric ile ortak kurulmuş, fabrika duvarlarındaki yazılar da Türkçe idi. Hiç bir amerikalı da çıkıp; "Neden bazı ayerlerde Türkçe yazıyor" diye zırıldamadı. Yazının şekli şemali üretim tesisi hakkında öyle sizin zırvaladığınız gibi kesin bilgiler içermez. BAE'nde, BAE'li bir firma aile ortak üretim tesisi kurmuş iseniz, neden fabrikanın duvarında Arapça yazılar var diye zırlamanın da bir alemi yok. Ne yani, Çince mi yazacaklardı fabrika duvarlarına ?
"Tank- palet fabrikasının satılması" martavalınızda ayrı bir hikâye. Satılan bir şey ortada yok. Üzerinize oturduğunuz o koca organelinizi büyüteceğinize azıcık kafa çalıştırıp, birazda "gerçekler nedir" acaba diye merak ederek, "gerçek" bilgileri verenleri takip etseydiniz, Tank-palet fabrikasının ARAPLARA değil, bir Türk firması/markası olan BMC'ye, 25 yıllığına, SATILMADIĞINI, kiralandığını çözebilirdiniz (BMC şirket hisselerinin %25.1’i Öztürk Ailesi’nin; %25’i Ethem Sancak’ın; geriye kalan %49.9’u ise Katar Silahlı Kuvvetlerinin). TAI'ninde %46.2'si ABD'li General Electric'e ait, yakında adı MİLLİ MUHARİP UÇAK olan kendi uçağımızı yapacaklar, o zamanda çıkıp zırıldanacak mısınız merak ederiz.
Adında olduğu gibi asıl görevi Tank-Palet üretmek olan fabrikanın bu güne kadar hiç bir tank üretmediğini bilseydiniz (hazır parçaları alıp birleştirmek tank üretmek değildir, öyle saçmalıkları umarım buraya cevap olarak girmezsiniz), BMC'ye yapılan kiralama ile buraya gerçek manada bir TANK ÜRETİM hattının kurulacağını, 25 Yıllık kiralama sonunda da, bu GERÇEK TANK ÜRETİM hattının bedava olarak T.C Devletine kalacağınıda bilebilirdiniz. T.C Devletinin acil olarak bir ana muharebe tankına ihtiyacı var, ancak devlet bütçesinin böyle bir ihtiyaca yönelik yatırımı yapabilecek maddi olanakları kısıtlı. Parası yok değil, kısıtlı. Buraya böylesine bir yatırım yapılsa bu defa başka elzem bir savunma sanayii ihtiyacını karşılayamayacak. Misal, TFX uçağına para ayıramayacak. Ayrıca devletin kurduğu fabrikalarda çalışanların %99,999'u amiyane tabiri ile torpil vasıtası işe girer, işe girince yan gelip yatar, 82 milyonun parasını hortumlar, hiç bir icraatte bulunmaz. Çok merak ediyorsanız bakın bakalım bu güne kadar kurulmuş hangi devlet kurumu bir icatta bulunmuş, memleketin hangi derdine bir derman geliştirmiş, bize nasıl milyarlarca gelir getirmiş. Bulursanız bizimle de paylaşın cehaletimiz gitsin biraz.
This M113 is a AIFV for yours armored
excelente tanque de guera bendiciones
Esto no es un tanque! Para ser un tanque tiene que tener un canon para atacar tanques. El proposito era transportar soldados que acompanan los tanques en un ataque. Por eso se llama "Armored Personnel Carrier," or APV.
Mashallah no adre produkt mia
참으로 대단한 M113 우리나라에도
많이 있었지 아직도 미국은 계속해서
생산하는것지 골통품 ㅎㅎㅎ
砂漠とアスファルトは走れて当然！湿地帯と海、砂浜はどうなんだろう？
Interesting
I definitely wouldn't swim an A1 again. Got a bath the hard way.
Peoples wind the war not the tank...it can help kill enemy faster.
حالين في الجيش العراقي وسائق ناقلة M113 السياقه مالته جيده وحلوه ولاكن صارت عجوز لان صناعه قديمه
Brazil?
saudi arabia
En nicaragua solo nos hace falta los aviones caza para mejor seguridad
I put many miles on the old 113, from jan.74 to 78.
Sure the hell beats walking....
Should be equipped with CIWS guns on it's turret.and rockets too.
Whats the title of music
good morning thank you for being beautiful thank you for being wonderful I hope you have a great day. Goodnight the greatness and you is beautiful
I wounded if they'll stand up to a ied
'
where is this local place M113 company