Andrade (2010): Doodling - A-Levels 9990 Psychology

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 янв 2025

Комментарии • 74

  • @lolbroooo7
    @lolbroooo7 3 года назад +44

    Homie you are a lifesaver. I have an exam in a week and I'm just going through your videos and literally every confusion has been solved so far. Thankyou for all the hard work! your efforts are highly appreciated.

  • @crunchycough
    @crunchycough 4 года назад +17

    It's really awesome that you're making these videos! I have friends who want to give the psychology exam privately and you've made their lives a ton easier! Thank you :)

    • @MagicRoss7
      @MagicRoss7 4 года назад +2

      I'm so happy to hear that! All the best to you and your friends sitting for exams :)

  • @maheenmengal6413
    @maheenmengal6413 3 года назад +29

    Please do all As level studies before CAIES 2021 ur videos are very beneficial for us .
    It's a very humble request to u

  • @balqeeskhan9115
    @balqeeskhan9115 Год назад +1

    Brooo!!! You are just amazing! Thank god i found you on RUclips now it's only you who can get me best score in my caies. THANK youuuuuuu ❤

  • @reagan4640
    @reagan4640 2 года назад +4

    I wanna thank you so much, I've got my psychology Pre-mock the day after and I'm just revising with your videos they're so helpful and informative I genuinely feel like I'm learning! Will come back to this comment when I get my results!!!

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  2 года назад +1

      Hello!
      Thank you for the positive feedback
      Do kindly show your appreciation by donating to my channel here: buy.stripe.com/14k2bK0AB1hm8qk4gg
      Thank you!

  • @asmidhakal5291
    @asmidhakal5291 4 года назад +7

    God Bless you! You made my revision so much easier.

  • @Lowkeysugar
    @Lowkeysugar 3 года назад +3

    Thankyou God bless I have my exam in 6 days. All I have seen is your videos and imma solve past papers now

  • @safiam5944
    @safiam5944 4 года назад +7

    Thanks a lot. Your videos are so helpful. Since we are doing online classes, I missed one class. But I was able to learn it all from your video.

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  4 года назад +1

      Thank you so much! Your comment really encourages me :)

    • @safiam5944
      @safiam5944 3 года назад

      @@cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100 I just want to ask you that do you teach sociology as well?

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад +1

      ​@@safiam5944 I'm afraid I dont teach sociology at the moment, perhaps in the future one day.

  • @forreal2009
    @forreal2009 Год назад

    You have no idea how useful these videos are :)

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  Год назад

      You are very welcome :)
      Do kindly donate to my channel to show your appreciation: buy.stripe.com/14k2bK0AB1hm8qk4gg

  • @thedreamhopper8234
    @thedreamhopper8234 3 года назад +3

    This helped me a lot! Thank you. Appreciate it very much.

  • @nandanamv6202
    @nandanamv6202 3 года назад +5

    I really like that he made the woman blue and the man pink 😀
    6:39

  • @eva-dq7mr
    @eva-dq7mr 2 месяца назад

    please come back your vids are fantastic!! EXPLAIN DATA ANALYSIS PLZZ

  • @noshur99
    @noshur99 9 месяцев назад

    You are a lifesaver TQ 😍

  • @dhwanipatel551
    @dhwanipatel551 3 года назад

    Thank you very much Ross. You are genius.

  • @chaeyoungluvr
    @chaeyoungluvr 2 года назад +4

    man got a caie in 6 days ure saving my arse fr

    • @aleenamalik1422
      @aleenamalik1422 2 года назад +2

      Legitttt...this guy's videos are LIFESAVER ☆☆

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  2 года назад +1

      Thank you :)
      If my videos have been useful, do kindly donate to my channel.

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  2 года назад +1

      I've glad my videos have saved you for the exams :)
      However, please do not only rely on them. Always read the original studies and the textbook.

    • @aleenamalik1422
      @aleenamalik1422 2 года назад +1

      @@cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100 Where can I find the original studies? Could u provide a source?

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  2 года назад +1

      @@aleenamalik1422 Hello, for students who donate to my channel, I send them a copy of all the original studies.
      However, if you search hard enough on Google you should be able to find them.
      If you make a donation then kindly contact me.

  • @tayamirai2177
    @tayamirai2177 3 года назад +3

    hiii could you do one in answering psychology questions, like for example questions like 'what is the psychology being investigated in ( various studies)' and ' evaluate the study on the basics of two strengths and weakness including a discussion on reliability" ? It would be very helpful and lifesaving for us students if we knew how to answer this type of difficult questions😭😭

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад

      I have a few videos on answering exam questions.
      I don't have the time to record more videos at the moment unfortunately.

  • @beabetterfootballer822
    @beabetterfootballer822 Год назад

    21:29 - I believe it was 35 females and 5 males in the sample

  • @alro5032
    @alro5032 Год назад

    you are a lifesaver 😍😍

  • @aynarana710
    @aynarana710 3 года назад

    thank you for this!!!!

  • @dieutrangvu8780
    @dieutrangvu8780 3 года назад +2

    Hello I wanna ask about what's the difference between these 2 categories: mean results for names (7.8 & 7.1) and the monitoring names of party goers (7.7 & 6.9). I hope you can answer it early. Thank you in advance!

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад +1

      Hello,
      The Mean Results for Names 7.8 & 7.1 are referring to the number of correctly written down names DURING the tape recording. During the experiment, the participants listened to the tape recording and wrote down the correct names they heard WHILE listening to the tape. This is NOT a recall. Because they write while they listen.
      For the Monitoring names 7.7 & 6.9 this refers to when the participants had to RECALL the names of party goers AFTER the tape recording was over. This is a RECALL because they write after they have listened. However, the authors call this as Monitoring Performance.

    • @dieutrangvu8780
      @dieutrangvu8780 3 года назад

      @@cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100 OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @yueshen9070
    @yueshen9070 3 года назад

    On 26:57, you said doodling group remember 7.8 names and control group remembered 7.1names, actually these data were monitoring tasks. so they wrote down 7.8 and 7.1 names correctly. the coursebook were also wrong.

  • @anousheybhatti1491
    @anousheybhatti1491 Год назад

    Were they asked to write names of party goers while listening to recording or after the recording was finished?

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  Год назад

      Yes, during the recording they were asked to write down the names of party goers that they noticed in the recording.

  • @yueshen9070
    @yueshen9070 3 года назад

    What do you think the sampling technique is? according to the article, it sounds like opportunity one, but based on textbook, it sounds like volunteer sampling.

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад +1

      I would say it's opportunity sampling
      How can it be volunteer when the researcher did not recruit volunteers via newspaper ads or emails or other means?

  • @fizanasir2585
    @fizanasir2585 3 года назад +1

    What if we doodle intentionally? I mean for example im not bored but i doodle to remember whatever teacher is saying, will it still work?

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад

      I think it should.

    • @fizanasir2585
      @fizanasir2585 3 года назад +1

      @@cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100 Will try, this study is not quite straightforward it has many unsure things

    • @MagicRoss7
      @MagicRoss7 3 года назад

      @@fizanasir2585 When in doubt, always consult the original study pdf file.

    • @don5241
      @don5241 2 года назад

      @@fizanasir2585 did it work? xD

    • @fizanasir2585
      @fizanasir2585 2 года назад +1

      @@don5241 haha i dont think so yet, i do doodle during chem class tho

  • @a12paper13
    @a12paper13 2 года назад +1

    Hello Sir, could you please explain how there 15 females and 5 males if there were a total of 40 ppts?

  • @starlalux
    @starlalux 3 года назад

    Sir, can you please tell me how you are substracting the names of non-party-goers from the names of party-goers if the former is not a part of the latter, but instead a part of the recording itself? I did not understand that part :(

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад

      I do not understand your question.
      Could you tell me which part of the video are you referring to?
      Give me the timecode so I can listen and clarify from there.

  • @notredjive3341
    @notredjive3341 3 года назад

    Why are the results taken from the results paper and the results you gave different?

  • @abadahzubair
    @abadahzubair Месяц назад

    I want pozzulo er al. (Line-ups) 😭 someone please help me

  • @cookwithbysma
    @cookwithbysma 2 года назад

    Assalamalaikum sir, what does operational definition mean?🥺

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  Год назад

      Hello,
      Operational definition is when you define something so that you can measure it accurately in an experiment.
      For example, if I want to measure happiness. I can operationally define happiness as the number of times a person smiles in 1 hour.
      Then I can observe them and count how many times they smiled, for example, 5 times and I can use that as a measure of their happiness.
      ------------------------------------------
      If you would like to kindly donate towards my channel to keep it alive I would greatly appreciate that.
      You can donate via:
      a) Stripe: buy.stripe.com/14k2bK0AB1hm8qk4gg
      b) PayPal: paypal.me/magicross7
      Thank you and God bless you :)

  • @nabihaali506
    @nabihaali506 2 года назад

    Hey, since there were 40 participants from which five were male then ain't it 35 females instead of 15 as you mentioned in the video?

  • @maazsiddiqui212
    @maazsiddiqui212 3 года назад

    the results from the table and the results u gave do not match. Also can u please explain standard deviation

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад

      Follow the original article as the definitive source of information on tables/results. I may not always be correct. For standard deviation, do check out online articles or videos on statistics to understand better.

  • @carlpiaf4476
    @carlpiaf4476 3 года назад

    Just thought I should point out that your use of between and within subjects isn't aligned with the curriculum. Should be independent measures and repeated measures:
    "describe and evaluate experimental designs as used in psychological research (independent measures, matched pairs and repeated measures)". Really useful videos though. Thanks!

    • @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100
      @cambridgea-levelspsycholog1100  3 года назад

      Thanks.
      I studied psych terminology using between and within subjects at university, hence why I tend to use those terms.
      As far as I am aware, Cambridge accepts both between/within as well as independent/repeated as long as they are used accurately.
      In my classes, I teach students both terms in case they should encounter it in journals.