Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
CARL SAGAN MARS THE SEARCH BEGINS NASA MARINER & VIKING MISSIONS 48614
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 авг 2024
- Famed astronomer and Cornell University scientist Carl Sagan takes the viewer to the Red Planet in this circa 1972 official NASA film, “Mars: The Search Begins.” Sagan explains that not much was known about our neighbor in space until the unmanned Mariner 9 space probe, which was launched toward Mars in 1971. At mark 00:55, geologist and astronomer Harold Masursky explains how scientists were working to understand how the planet was formed, while biologist Gerald Soffen explains the importance of the search for life on Mars (mark 01:27). Beginning at mark 01:53, we see several images taken by Mariner 9 while we’re told of the significance of the scenes, including massive dust storms and volcanoes. At mark 04:20 we learn of the temperature variations that range from -150 degrees at night to 70 degrees on the equator. As the film continues we learn of how scientists were using images to carefully map the surface, as well as it’s two moons - Phobos and Deimos. Mark 06:15 shows artist renditions of what the surface of Mars may look like, with red sands giving way to blue sky and wispy white clouds. Sagan returns at mark 07:00 to discuss changes observed on the Martian surface that they concluded were the result of high winds uncovering material underneath, while images sustain his claims. He also discusses 3,000 mile long rifts on the Martian surface (mark 10:15) and possible volcanic activity at Olympus Mons (mark 12:30). Mariner 9 images also contained a few surprises, Sagan explains starting at mark 15:30, including hundreds channels that they believed may have been cut by running water - even though no evidence of water had been found. At mark 19:30, Soffen returns to ponder “what is life” and does life in any form exist on Mars. At mark 21:55, the film looks toward the future the planned 1976 Viking mission, which safely landed a pair of spacecraft on the planet. (Soffen explained, starting at mark 22:05, that a major goal of Viking was to search for life). The film’s narrator (actor Vic Perrin) concludes at mark 27:25 that the mission may answer one of science’s greatest questions: “Has life developed only on Earth? Or is there life elsewhere?”
Mariner 9 (Mariner Mars '71 / Mariner-I) was an unmanned NASA space probe that contributed greatly to the exploration of Mars and was part of the Mariner program. Mariner 9 was launched toward Mars on May 30, 1971 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and reached the planet on November 14 of the same year, becoming the first spacecraft to orbit another planet - only narrowly beating the Soviets' Mars 2 and Mars 3, which both arrived within a month. After months of dust storms it managed to send back clear pictures of the surface. Mariner 9 returned 7329 images over the course of its mission, which concluded in October 1972. Mariner 9 remains a derelict satellite in Mars orbit. It is expected to remain in orbit until approximately 2022, when the spacecraft is projected to enter the Martian atmosphere and either burn up or crash into the planet's surface.
We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...
I had this video on VHS as a little kid back in the late '80s and couldn't watch it enough. This was my first encounter with Carl Sagan. I haven't seen this since I was probably 10. The combination of the visuals and the creepy music are still just as mesmerizing as they were back then. Thanks Periscope!!!
Love our channel? Become a channel member and -- help us save and post more orphaned films! Or support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
Was that the America's Achievements in Space set? I have that set and also used to watch it a lot as a kid.
@@PeriscopeFilm Instead of using your reply to ask for money, you should at least thank the commenter for his heartfelt personal story from his past. Copying and pasting this standard money begging comment is why you're not getting the money from patreons that you expect. Thank the commenter. Make an effort to interact
Ahh.. classic Carl Sagan :) Thanks for posting!
He was in his late 30s here -- 9 years before "Cosmos".
This is great! A trip around Mars topography, with an eerie musical score, narrated by Vic Perrin, with Sagan interrupting every once in a while to assure us everything is scientifically accurate.
I am in awe of Sagan
ah old docs fell more live that the ones today and a plus, Carl Sagan!
tanks for post it : )
This is very good. Thanks.
A gem, thank you so very much for posting 👍
No problem Dave' btw..Happy Birthday 🧡
0.51 That stuff on that guys desk. Need to explore.
Love those 80s scientific films, made it so mysterious like horror movies :D
Generelley fasctnating the "space-music" in these documentaries from the 60's onwards.
Carl wish you could hear about the new findings from mars
What's the new findings?
I’m sure he knows😇
are his eyes green? i’m not even listening to what he’s saying, he’s so stunning
Cool... I be interested to see the reults of the Perseverence mission.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
There has to be fossil evidence of some kind on Mars, if life there ever existed. I hope we can someday send a team of archeologists to find it!
awesome unseen
Stupid, period.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
Back in the day when we were full of hope that there was life on Mars.
Beats any 2 - 3 minute infantile JPL video that we are fed nowadays. Those were the days when Mars data did not get censored yet. Also have a look at FB page facebook.com/Mars-Unexpected-603532389829416/ Many thanks for posting, subbed.
@4:20 70 degrees F on Mars?
yup! Some rovers have measured 68 F
06:11 superficie de marte desenho
check @6:14...dark blue skies?.. when is the ministry of truth to scrub this video? we all know mars' sky is PINK!
is that Ronald Reagan narrating?
Narrated by Vic Perrin.
@@caturdaynite7217 The "Control Voice" from The Outer Limits
I thought exactly the same thing. It was from a time when narrators and actors actually went to school and studied how to speak properly
Mercury is not a planet but Venus' moon.
Incorrect. Mercury is the planet closest to the sun.
An interesting theory
Mercury is to big to be captured by Venus
Olympus Mons new? Based on a lack of meteor craters? Good guess, but, uh, wrong. It kept spewing magma, which covered up most meteor strikes, until it ceased being active.
Interesting how statements stated in a monotone and confident voice, especially when wearing a white lab coat, and bereft of a head wrapped in bandages, and in a manner devoid of grasping one’s head and rocking back-and-forth rhythmically, and while definitely NOT stating “I t’ink I’m loozin’ mah mind” equals having one’s opinions, no matter how wrong they are, with facts.
Glad we got Experts like you with a PhD in Planetary Science and Geology letting us know how incompetent Carl Sagan was. What would we be without you and all the experts coming from the University of Electric Universe Pseudoscience.
Mitch Barr-Elleli - Science, the self correcting process. It has nothing to do with lab coats or convincing voices. If it’s not supported with evidence, it’s worthless!!
@@Raydensheraj Look into the work of someone named "Edward Bernays". Your lack of education is appalling.
@@elvisischrist "Science" is a meaningless term. And most people who use this term ignore an intellectually honest and logical application of the scientific method. Instead, these minds engage in every logical fallacy one can think of. They usually resort to circular reasoning and name-calling while shadowboxing straw-men.
The contour of Olympus Mons suggests that any geological or volcanic activity would've occurred after LHB.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
“Mr. Madison, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”
-The film Billy Madison, 1995
This scene comes to mind when reading your comment.
@@flameless4644 and your proof that I'm wrong....
(blank)
Oh, and you thought it wouldn't be noticed.
do you believe in god?
@@malawigw I believe you are very slow. VERY.
So it’s a choice between Dr Sagan, , a Cornell University teacher, Astrophysicist,writer of Cosmos, collaborator on the Viking & Voyager missions, world famous communicator of Science & Astronomy - or- the Catholic Church’s view of Astronomy based on the Bible .
Not a difficult choice!
Dr Sagan knows what he is talking about.
Your personal abuse of Dr Sagan both here & elsewhere is telling. Jealousy perhaps? His intelligence is daunting . Why not enjoy it? Millions do.