It's a "Trail Link" landing gear system. Don't want to burst your bubble, but it's really hard not to make a good landing with this setup! It was a nice landing!
Great catch! That was textbook too. There is never a 'good' time to have an engine quit, but there are certainly a couple of really bad times for it to happen and that was certainly one of them! That landing was sooooosmooooth! 😊 Thanks for the whole video upload.👍🏻
To all experts out there: There was no fuel dumping involved as this A330 is not equipped with a fuel jettison option. It landed overweight, it did use reverse thrust (which is not visible to the viewer since Engine 2 was shut down), it stopped and did not vacate the runway since the brake temperatures would still go up and the crew did not want to risk any tire bursts, etc. and prepared for any worst case scenario. It is also a little different from any normal single engine taxiing since the pilots do not taxi an overweight aircraft with hot brakes close to or possibly above maintenance limits and a damaged & shutdown engine.
That is a boot full of left rudder!!! For anyone not familiar, when the right engine farts, the good engine is pushing him right so he needs left rudder straight away to stay on the runway centre line. Those engines are big and if you were there in person its very very loud when it farts, all the car alarms will be going off. And a boot full of right rudder on landing...
I was plane spotting at Clutters Park, El Segundo, CA for flights at LAX Los Angeles on November 19, 2019, when a Philippines' Airlines 777 suffered a Compressor Stall on takeoff. I could see flames shooting out the right engine and hear a very loud "popping" just after lifting off the runway. The 777 continued westbound a sort distance from the airport (with the flames and popping continuing) and banked hard left and performed a emergency go-around landing about 15 minutes with no problems. No fuel was dumped and the 777 was overweight upon landing. After a taxi to the far west side of LAX, there was traces of smoke rising from the tires and landing gear. Passengers and crew were deboarded using stairs.
@ most airlines SOP’s as well as the manufacturers specs prohibit the use of reverse thrust as it can cause steering issues caused by asymmetrical drag. Most likely they used reverse thrust if the company allows
If this happened in my country, the only main airport would be closed for a whole day and all the flights would be diverted to neighboring countries and the aircraft would be stranded on the runway until they bring some tractors to pull it. 😂
@@jaws3009Because the pilot said that they afraid the overweight landing would damage the landing gear. Also, they concerned hot breaks due to no reverser.
Because the knew what had happened and there was no immediate danger. Note that they used a thermal camera to inspect the damaged engine from the outside for any hot spot that coul lead to a devastating fire.
Hi Mate, that catch in your video was epic! Would it be alright if I included few clips in my next video? I'll credit your channel in the description and link back to the original. Let me know. Cheers
They need to shut down both engines before the firefighters can get close enough to fully inspect the plane and give the all clear. At that point, they’d rather tow it away than risk restarting a potentially malfunctioning aircraft.
Yeah that doesn't make practical sense to me. I suppose its to come to a stop and shutdown as soon as possible. There may well be a trail of debris out of the engine. But the engine is already shut down and the aircraft is under control so at that point its not really any different to taxi on single engine. Plus you have a lot more faff.
The A330 airliner sits nose down, which would have meant the freighter version (which came later) would have had a sloping freight deck. To correct this Airbus needed either a longer nose gear or the nose gear needed to be mounted lower. Airbus chose the latter to maintain commonality of gear components with the airliner version (which is desirable to operators) hence the bulge to accomodate the lower mounting.
We can see flames when they lost the engine. They would have shut down the engine and gone through the engine fire procedure before returning. When there is a fire, it is standard procedure to stay on the runway until the emergency services have assessed the situation. The cockpit crew still might not know if there was still a fire or not. A fire is one of the worst things that can happen during any phase of flight. The engine went bang just after VR, and even if it had gone bang before V1 and they rejected the takeoff, they would have stayed on the runway for safety reasons. The runway would just be closed, and other aircraft would go into the hold or divert until the situation is resolved.
Why did they send 5 engines to one incident, supposing another incident occurred somewhere I voukd have understood 5 being sent out if it was a passenger plane
You don't panic. That only comes later when you have chance to think about it. At the time, you know its an engine failure and you poke the rudder automatically because you have done it many times in training and simulator, because of that its one of those moments where everything just seems to happen around you. I agree they were professional down to a tee. The CVR will probably still have some profanities in it though.
I was wondering if anyone else saw that, right at 34 seconds.... Maybe started sucking in oil from somewhere, since there was no pop or anything with it
Question : Is it procedure to stop on runway for all safety situations..Could they not park it away from the runway and stop the delays in this particular case?...i'm sure theres a good reason though.Just curious. Thanks.
One possible scenario for what they did: They came in heavy with degraded/no reverse thrust and the brakes were about to cook off. That mandates a stop to cool them down before resuming taxi. It also gives the ground and emergency vehicles time to inspect the brakes and tyres before resuming.
@@altsak840 Yes, it is also full of cargo, coming in for landing is mostly the aircraft's inertia working for you, just gliding in but then you need thrust to taxi and if you're carrying a lot of cargo, your aircraft is probably too heavy to taxi with one engine, it would require more thrust than required which could stress the engine pilon based on their calculations, in flight this is okay as you can counter the thrust with rudder and the aircraft is already moving and generating lift. So safer to just taxi it.
@@supernova4760This is bullshit. We regurarily taxi single engine only to save fuel. They stopped on the runway because they didn't use thrust reverser during landing and may additionally also be overweight, which cooks the brakes. After that why take the risk of additional aircraft damages, just use the tug on ground until maintenance ensured the aircraft is perfectly fine again.
To answer your good question - I was wondering the same - reverse is still available on the good engine. It’s Airbus SOP that in cases like this, both reverse levers should be selected even though one engine is shut down. This is to avoid the tragedy that occurred in Sao Paolo years ago to an A320 load of TAM passengers when the PF didn’t just select one reverser, but still kept the other thrust lever way above forward idle resulting in the aircraft overrunning the runway, hitting a petrol (gas) station and exploding.
It is standard procedure for single engine only landings to prevent asymmetrical thrust reverse. It is likely they shut engine 2 down after initial climbout to reduce damage.
@@9-FS Not correct at all about standard procedure. Airbus says that it’s quite okay to use asymmetric reverse. Furthermore, the yaw when using single-engine thrust is a doddle to handle.
If you have a standard electronics fan, the ones used in your computer for example, if you have a desktop computer, you can make it stall by putting it onto a level surface. It will start spinning faster but move no air because the same air spins with the blades without moving anywhere. A jet engine is full of layers upon layers of fan blades that feed air to the combustion chamber. When these stall, you get slow-moving air with slow-burning fuel, no thrust and flames coming out the rear.
Poor ocean creatures, drink lots of dumped AV gas. Closed runway. Takes time to inspect and clear any debris after heavy landing. Coocord crashed because fuel tank is hit by a metal piece left on runway by other aeroplane.
Absolutely nailed the heavy landing 👍🏻
Dam, the landing was butter❤
I have never seen a landing like this before. Those pilots deserve a nice Tropical Vacation. 😁
It's a "Trail Link" landing gear system. Don't want to burst your bubble, but it's really hard not to make a good landing with this setup! It was a nice landing!
Ikr
Called butter machine for a reason
Great catch! That was textbook too. There is never a 'good' time to have an engine quit, but there are certainly a couple of really bad times for it to happen and that was certainly one of them! That landing was sooooosmooooth! 😊
Thanks for the whole video upload.👍🏻
This is a very delicate moment in the takeoff phase. The crew worked perfectly and reacted very well. 👍✈ Thank you for the video.
To all experts out there:
There was no fuel dumping involved as this A330 is not equipped with a fuel jettison option. It landed overweight, it did use reverse thrust (which is not visible to the viewer since Engine 2 was shut down), it stopped and did not vacate the runway since the brake temperatures would still go up and the crew did not want to risk any tire bursts, etc. and prepared for any worst case scenario. It is also a little different from any normal single engine taxiing since the pilots do not taxi an overweight aircraft with hot brakes close to or possibly above maintenance limits and a damaged & shutdown engine.
Many thanks for this context.
Happened at the worst possible moment. Great job by the crew. It's amazing that these aircraft can climb out on just one engine! Thanks for the video
That is a boot full of left rudder!!! For anyone not familiar, when the right engine farts, the good engine is pushing him right so he needs left rudder straight away to stay on the runway centre line. Those engines are big and if you were there in person its very very loud when it farts, all the car alarms will be going off. And a boot full of right rudder on landing...
Still a butter despite the engine failure, amazing pilot skills!!
It’s cool to see what “part spoilers” looks like in real life!
Textbook handling by the crew. That's why training is so important
wow stil nailed the landing!
I was plane spotting at Clutters Park, El Segundo, CA for flights at LAX Los Angeles on November 19, 2019, when a Philippines' Airlines 777 suffered a Compressor Stall on takeoff. I could see flames shooting out the right engine and hear a very loud "popping" just after lifting off the runway. The 777 continued westbound a sort distance from the airport (with the flames and popping continuing) and banked hard left and performed a emergency go-around landing about 15 minutes with no problems. No fuel was dumped and the 777 was overweight upon landing. After a taxi to the far west side of LAX, there was traces of smoke rising from the tires and landing gear. Passengers and crew were deboarded using stairs.
That's why those people get to fly that hardware.
Worst possible timing...but they handled it like pros.
Thank you for sharing 😊
Great landing by the crew despite only having spoilers and no reverse thrust
From my observation, there was reverse thrust from the left engine since there was rudder input to the right. (Correct me if I'm wrong, thx.)
@ most airlines SOP’s as well as the manufacturers specs prohibit the use of reverse thrust as it can cause steering issues caused by asymmetrical drag. Most likely they used reverse thrust if the company allows
@@GoldCoastGuy82 thanks for the info!
Didn’t they have brakes too??
@@Noahthenorth yes they do have brakes.
If this happened in my country, the only main airport would be closed for a whole day and all the flights would be diverted to neighboring countries and the aircraft would be stranded on the runway until they bring some tractors to pull it. 😂
Why the firefighters were not already in standby position? Seems like it took some time until the trucks approached the aircraft 🤔🤔
you know the saying "TIA (this is Africa)"? It's like that, this is Hong Kong!!!
Surprised they blocked the runway, rather than vacate?!
@@jaws3009Because the pilot said that they afraid the overweight landing would damage the landing gear. Also, they concerned hot breaks due to no reverser.
Because the knew what had happened and there was no immediate danger. Note that they used a thermal camera to inspect the damaged engine from the outside for any hot spot that coul lead to a devastating fire.
@@chumingfung5811, brakes, not breaks.
@@chumingfung5811engine 1 was active they could use reverse thrust on engine one but they didn’t due to it causing the plane to go off balance
Butter landing.
Now I know why my package is late- Thx!
Good training paid off !
Rare moment!
They flew the airplane plain and simple, textbook!
Wow, when did this happen?
Wow Fantastic editing job!!! Love how you incorporated the go-around tracker in your video!!
Like
Subscribe!
Interesting, you see the right engine cough at the :34 second mark. Wonder if it ingested something at this point
Full EMS turnout but no evacuation?
What you marked as engine shutdown was the APU.
Firefighters were insanely slow to the scene, could’ve staged much closer, every second counts when it matters
Well well well that looks a delayed flight on all the departure waiting in line right there 😢
EAT Leipzig Airbus A330-200, registration D-ALOS performing flight QY-547 from Hong Kong (China) to Almaty (Kazakhstan). November 24th, 2024 😉
Hi Mate, that catch in your video was epic! Would it be alright if I included few clips in my next video? I'll credit your channel in the description and link back to the original. Let me know. Cheers
WHY isn't a firetruck posted along the runway to be able to assist immediately? This seemed rather late. 😮
Anyone else catch the hiccup from that same engine at 34 seconds? Look like it was already having issues
Yes you're right!
excuse my ignorance, but once it landed, why couldn't it taxi itself off the runway on one engine?
They need to shut down both engines before the firefighters can get close enough to fully inspect the plane and give the all clear. At that point, they’d rather tow it away than risk restarting a potentially malfunctioning aircraft.
Yeah that doesn't make practical sense to me. I suppose its to come to a stop and shutdown as soon as possible. There may well be a trail of debris out of the engine. But the engine is already shut down and the aircraft is under control so at that point its not really any different to taxi on single engine. Plus you have a lot more faff.
The Christmas packages are coming later this year. 🙂
I guess the same happens when a raindeer farts on one side.
Why did they get the trucks rolling ?
Nice video!
Why does the cargo A330, have that weird looking hump on the nose wheel?
To enhance cargo space...🎉
The A330 airliner sits nose down, which would have meant the freighter version (which came later) would have had a sloping freight deck. To correct this Airbus needed either a longer nose gear or the nose gear needed to be mounted lower. Airbus chose the latter to maintain commonality of gear components with the airliner version (which is desirable to operators) hence the bulge to accomodate the lower mounting.
@@MagicflyerUK thanks!
What a beautiful landing.
Like a cat pissing on velvet.
Interesting it didn't exit the taxiway (50 more feet) so as to clear the runway, and keep the runway active for other aircraft.....
We can see flames when they lost the engine. They would have shut down the engine and gone through the engine fire procedure before returning. When there is a fire, it is standard procedure to stay on the runway until the emergency services have assessed the situation. The cockpit crew still might not know if there was still a fire or not. A fire is one of the worst things that can happen during any phase of flight. The engine went bang just after VR, and even if it had gone bang before V1 and they rejected the takeoff, they would have stayed on the runway for safety reasons. The runway would just be closed, and other aircraft would go into the hold or divert until the situation is resolved.
Everyone noticed how the nose was a bit weird
Why did they send 5 engines to one incident, supposing another incident occurred somewhere I voukd have understood 5 being sent out if it was a passenger plane
ICAO will have standard firefighting procedures for it and HK will have its own dedicated ones as well
how long between takeoff, tank emptying and landing
Only a pro can control a plane like that without panicking
You don't panic. That only comes later when you have chance to think about it. At the time, you know its an engine failure and you poke the rudder automatically because you have done it many times in training and simulator, because of that its one of those moments where everything just seems to happen around you. I agree they were professional down to a tee. The CVR will probably still have some profanities in it though.
I wonder if that initial puff was inaudible.... because if it wasn't this would've been the point to reject
I was wondering if anyone else saw that, right at 34 seconds.... Maybe started sucking in oil from somewhere, since there was no pop or anything with it
Nice share bro
Wow that rudder deflection! 🦾
Question : Is it procedure to stop on runway for all safety situations..Could they not park it away from the runway and stop the delays in this particular case?...i'm sure theres a good reason though.Just curious. Thanks.
One possible scenario for what they did: They came in heavy with degraded/no reverse thrust and the brakes were about to cook off. That mandates a stop to cool them down before resuming taxi. It also gives the ground and emergency vehicles time to inspect the brakes and tyres before resuming.
@@altsak840 Yes, it is also full of cargo, coming in for landing is mostly the aircraft's inertia working for you, just gliding in but then you need thrust to taxi and if you're carrying a lot of cargo, your aircraft is probably too heavy to taxi with one engine, it would require more thrust than required which could stress the engine pilon based on their calculations, in flight this is okay as you can counter the thrust with rudder and the aircraft is already moving and generating lift. So safer to just taxi it.
@@supernova4760This is bullshit. We regurarily taxi single engine only to save fuel. They stopped on the runway because they didn't use thrust reverser during landing and may additionally also be overweight, which cooks the brakes. After that why take the risk of additional aircraft damages, just use the tug on ground until maintenance ensured the aircraft is perfectly fine again.
i didnt see thrust reversers used. is that std procedure following a compressor stall?
it happened after V1
To answer your good question - I was wondering the same - reverse is still available on the good engine. It’s Airbus SOP that in cases like this, both reverse levers should be selected even though one engine is shut down. This is to avoid the tragedy that occurred in Sao Paolo years ago to an A320 load of TAM passengers when the PF didn’t just select one reverser, but still kept the other thrust lever way above forward idle resulting in the aircraft overrunning the runway, hitting a petrol (gas) station and exploding.
Maybe the wind speed/ direction is a factor
It is standard procedure for single engine only landings to prevent asymmetrical thrust reverse. It is likely they shut engine 2 down after initial climbout to reduce damage.
@@9-FS Not correct at all about standard procedure. Airbus says that it’s quite okay to use asymmetric reverse. Furthermore, the yaw when using single-engine thrust is a doddle to handle.
And the point of this video is ?
Foi Uma Ave No Motor ?
Engine stall
nevertheless eng problem, PF control airplane very well.
What is a compresser stall?
The right and left engines are compressors.the engines sucks the air when moving.
If you have a standard electronics fan, the ones used in your computer for example, if you have a desktop computer, you can make it stall by putting it onto a level surface. It will start spinning faster but move no air because the same air spins with the blades without moving anywhere. A jet engine is full of layers upon layers of fan blades that feed air to the combustion chamber. When these stall, you get slow-moving air with slow-burning fuel, no thrust and flames coming out the rear.
Which Airport?
HKG
Bei der Landung kein Reverse mehr eingesetzt, korrekt?
生母不要控制我
That’s not a stall
Oh la la
DHL is cooking recently, why is there so much problem with their planes?
DHL doesn't have a good safety record in aviation, that's for sure.
Poor ocean creatures, drink lots of dumped AV gas.
Closed runway. Takes time to inspect and clear any debris after heavy landing.
Coocord crashed because fuel tank is hit by a metal piece left on runway by other aeroplane.