Dude you are talking to the wrong people about this problem. The stock market and monetary trading has no contribute to society. All they do is take advantage of the fact that the money we use is a fiat currency that has no set value. When money has no set value than the value of products and services will have different values in different locations and when you have a stock price that is a lower value in one place and a higher value in another than the stock exchangers get free money from buying a cheaper stock than selling the same stock for a higher value when the value of the stock should just be the same everywhere. These people are parasite like creatures to our society and have been stealing wealth from the people for decades from the monetary system having no set value to our money. Our money needs to have a set value to it that one can go and trade that value for a good or service that has a matching value to it. As long as we have a fiat currency being used as our money we will never have a free market or control of our own wealth in society and this fiat currency is what needs to be changed. The advice you are getting is completely wrong because you are talking to the wrong people. Talk to someone like Mike Maloney the author of Gold and Silver investments....
The market is for every body, there are a lot of money exchange that mean that is for every one for big companies Banks, fund to retailler people there is no part.. It's always important to know how is working for your onw knowlege
Voluntary exchange should not cost interest in order to do. It should be done willingly and at free of cost for all people in the market exchange. The day where the people get to perform voluntary exchanges without the involvement of any 3rd party taking a cut on the transaction then the exchange market will never be free. Yes anyone can get involved in the market but that doesn't mean that its "free". The free market is what the people should be fighting for not educated themselves on a market that isn't free to begin with.
There's absolutely Nothing on Creative Destruction ! It is unfolding at every stage of our development and growth. That, would singularly ensure we are left constantly moving forward in growth.
When I see men wearing white tee shirt under their shirts I get worried. If that's their taste in fashion how does this affect their judgement in other aspects of their decision making?
The problem with capitalism is not growth but stagnation. Real growth is hard, rewarding, yes, but really hard to have a leap. Therefore, it goes to the path of least resistance, which is recycling "cannibalism" that improves "efficency" at the cost of quality, without productivity, without innovation...
I think the real central issue is the use of GDP as shorthand for what actually requires far more conplex analysis to reckon with. Growth as a factir if human burthd bs deaths is one thing. But to say that because our medical system is adding to GDP because cancer is on the rise, and thats good for everyone, and the like, well that's rediculous in its face.
I do believe the growth was to be moving into outer space. That's why landing on the moon was a huge deal in it's day. Even when I was a kid in the 80-90's I saw lots of advertising of space hotels coming soon. But they were just like the Jetson flying car's that never came too. But ya back on point. And that point is infinite growth works in a infinite Universe that you can go explore and colonize in. But ya I do believe they were way a head of them self's on that one.
Why outer space when huge chunk of earth is still swamp and undeveloped. Africa, huge swathe of Asia, South/Central America.... are they suppose to sit around and accept their backward conditions ?
Except no one ever landed there. Why would you sit the whole world down to watch the maiden voyage of a mission to an untested environment, piloted by a tamagochi, landing on four skis on an uncertain rocky surface? Given the massive chance of failure, and the fact that those missions were postured as a righteous proxy for the appropriateness of the American sociological milleu at the height of the cold war, where capitalism was under seige, both as a the prevailing political system and as a robust philosophical construct. It's completely implausible that the stakeholders would have taken such a reckless gamble; It would have been a tragic public spectacle of failure, broadcast to every home in the developed world, in the face of superior Soviet technology, which bolstered the looming threat of communism beyond anything Soviet propagandist might have conceived. They can't even get small probes to land anywhere near reliably today, even given all our modern computing, engineering and advanced telemetry (the telemetry from the Apollo missions has somehow mysteriously managed to disappear, btw.) Yet Apollo managed it perfectly, every single time.
The notion that capitalism only survives if its always growing is totally wrong. The only goal of capitalism is to provide for consumers the products and services they want at a more efficient and popular manner to beat your competition. This results in excellence and abundance for the consumers. Once a company acquires 100% market share of a given item, it becomes inefficient and less profitable to overproduce beyond that consumption. The natural limit of growth is the amount we consume so what a beautiful system that we get to control a company’s growth with our spending choices. In capitalism you get to vote with your dollars, its amazing.
@@walterdamico4592 a company could have totally flat revenue for a very long time and be just fine. All that matters is that its revenue exceeds its expenses (debt service included). And ive been studying it for 13 years i think i understand it just fine
Good question, keep growing until you leave the earth without resources for the next generation, We are the sick, of greed😢😢😢
Dude you are talking to the wrong people about this problem. The stock market and monetary trading has no contribute to society. All they do is take advantage of the fact that the money we use is a fiat currency that has no set value. When money has no set value than the value of products and services will have different values in different locations and when you have a stock price that is a lower value in one place and a higher value in another than the stock exchangers get free money from buying a cheaper stock than selling the same stock for a higher value when the value of the stock should just be the same everywhere. These people are parasite like creatures to our society and have been stealing wealth from the people for decades from the monetary system having no set value to our money. Our money needs to have a set value to it that one can go and trade that value for a good or service that has a matching value to it. As long as we have a fiat currency being used as our money we will never have a free market or control of our own wealth in society and this fiat currency is what needs to be changed. The advice you are getting is completely wrong because you are talking to the wrong people. Talk to someone like Mike Maloney the author of Gold and Silver investments....
The market is for every body, there are a lot of money exchange that mean that is for every one for big companies Banks, fund to retailler people there is no part.. It's always important to know how is working for your onw knowlege
Voluntary exchange should not cost interest in order to do. It should be done willingly and at free of cost for all people in the market exchange. The day where the people get to perform voluntary exchanges without the involvement of any 3rd party taking a cut on the transaction then the exchange market will never be free. Yes anyone can get involved in the market but that doesn't mean that its "free". The free market is what the people should be fighting for not educated themselves on a market that isn't free to begin with.
Dude, they provide a fair estimation of value that is crucial for any system
Merci beaucoup.
❤️
There's absolutely Nothing on Creative Destruction !
It is unfolding at every stage of our development and growth.
That, would singularly ensure we are left constantly moving forward in growth.
Half the content of this doc is recycled from other docs. You’ve seen most of it before.
I haven’t
Still truth.
Exactly
Simple answers to complex issues are never successful. Economists should know this as well as anyone who calls themselves a scientist.
Economic Exponential Growth
When I see men wearing white tee shirt under their shirts I get worried. If that's their taste in fashion how does this affect their judgement in other aspects of their decision making?
The problem with capitalism is not growth but stagnation. Real growth is hard, rewarding, yes, but really hard to have a leap. Therefore, it goes to the path of least resistance, which is recycling "cannibalism" that improves "efficency" at the cost of quality, without productivity, without innovation...
I think the real central issue is the use of GDP as shorthand for what actually requires far more conplex analysis to reckon with. Growth as a factir if human burthd bs deaths is one thing. But to say that because our medical system is adding to GDP because cancer is on the rise, and thats good for everyone, and the like, well that's rediculous in its face.
I do believe the growth was to be moving into outer space. That's why landing on the moon was a huge deal in it's day. Even when I was a kid in the 80-90's I saw lots of advertising of space hotels coming soon. But they were just like the Jetson flying car's that never came too. But ya back on point. And that point is infinite growth works in a infinite Universe that you can go explore and colonize in. But ya I do believe they were way a head of them self's on that one.
Why outer space when huge chunk of earth is still swamp and undeveloped.
Africa, huge swathe of Asia, South/Central America.... are they suppose to sit around and accept their backward conditions ?
Except no one ever landed there.
Why would you sit the whole world down to watch the maiden voyage of a mission to an untested environment, piloted by a tamagochi, landing on four skis on an uncertain rocky surface? Given the massive chance of failure, and the fact that those missions were postured as a righteous proxy for the appropriateness of the American sociological milleu at the height of the cold war, where capitalism was under seige, both as a the prevailing political system and as a robust philosophical construct. It's completely implausible that the stakeholders would have taken such a reckless gamble; It would have been a tragic public spectacle of failure, broadcast to every home in the developed world, in the face of superior Soviet technology, which bolstered the looming threat of communism beyond anything Soviet propagandist might have conceived.
They can't even get small probes to land anywhere near reliably today, even given all our modern computing, engineering and advanced telemetry (the telemetry from the Apollo missions has somehow mysteriously managed to disappear, btw.) Yet Apollo managed it perfectly, every single time.
The notion that capitalism only survives if its always growing is totally wrong. The only goal of capitalism is to provide for consumers the products and services they want at a more efficient and popular manner to beat your competition. This results in excellence and abundance for the consumers. Once a company acquires 100% market share of a given item, it becomes inefficient and less profitable to overproduce beyond that consumption. The natural limit of growth is the amount we consume so what a beautiful system that we get to control a company’s growth with our spending choices. In capitalism you get to vote with your dollars, its amazing.
... wage slavery ...
You don't understand how the financial system works. Without growth the debt couldn't be paid back, and capitalism would crash.
Growth is a natural law... the guy in the car factory claimed
@@walterdamico4592 a company could have totally flat revenue for a very long time and be just fine. All that matters is that its revenue exceeds its expenses (debt service included). And ive been studying it for 13 years i think i understand it just fine
16:08🕵️♂️🛰️🤔🚀🔭 HOW fast does EARTH 🌍 $pin ""¹⁰⁰⁰MPH""😶🌫️🤨🤦♂️🙊
11:50 this man is poisoning the soil and in times microorganisms 🦠 much needed for soil will die.
Capitalism only works if economic growth continues? I propose that capitalism can exist without growth. It simply requires a stable population.
Ok Bill Gates…..
A stable global population is 1 - 2 billion without fossil fuels.
@@rossprice4077 No. I just play bridge with him.
@@life42theuniverse That is why it is so unrealistic to talk of "net zero".
Growing population, it's a pyramid scheme
failed