FT SIMPLE CUB | Build Video | India | Homemade Remote Control Airplane

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @ashvanths1581
    @ashvanths1581 5 месяцев назад +1

    Hi sir, this is one of the best remakes I have seen on the ft simple cub, waiting to see more from your side.....
    I need a small help, can I know the diameter of that cycle spoke , which you have used on the landing gear please ??

  • @harendrachaudhary4730
    @harendrachaudhary4730 Год назад +1

    Nice build... Excellent flying.... 👍

  • @thefpvguy6855
    @thefpvguy6855 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hey, nice build. what angle (upwards and downwards) should i keep the motor in.

  • @DarghozTV
    @DarghozTV Год назад +1

    Nice

  • @tarunchaudhary1987
    @tarunchaudhary1987 2 года назад +1

    Super..

  • @ronirc
    @ronirc 2 года назад +1

    Goooooooooood

  • @sagnikchatterjee8122
    @sagnikchatterjee8122 9 месяцев назад

    Bro FlingMachines ka flying cub wala kit assemble karo na . Please.☹. Mene kharid lia aab bana nhi pa rhe☹

  • @MonirulIslam-ts6cd
    @MonirulIslam-ts6cd 2 года назад +1

    How many depron sheet you need for this plane

  • @arjungaming9238
    @arjungaming9238 2 года назад +1

    How you get that pdf page in big size please reply 🥺🥺

  • @luissouza5501
    @luissouza5501 11 месяцев назад +1

    Show!!!!!

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 2 года назад +1

    information. at 4:13, the use of this component stoopidly Adds excess MASS to the model.!
    at 8:35, wingtips SHOULD BE FINISHED.!!!!! the curvature at the forward lower surface is a 'happy accident'; it will result in a slightly more-normal wing.! the 'step' near the trailing edge should NOT be there.! because, it MAKES LOTS OF DRAG.! ALL of the TIME.!
    at 9:18, a split elevator Should Have a suitably stiff central brace (linking the 'halves' of the elevator.)
    at 12:32, a flexible pushrod May need to be supported over Most of its length.!
    at 12:44, control horns are Not correctly located.
    at 12:52, the location of the mass of servos 'high' in the fuselage, is the Opposite of smart.! both servo arms Should be configured in the Same way. in general, the use of the outermost hole in a servo arm is not recommend. because, doing so gives a servo the Least amount of MA over the load. MA is mechanical advantage. it looks like the pushrods SHOULD HAVE more support, in order to Limit the amount of FLEX that occurs; during 'push'.
    at 13:22, it is IMPORTANT that these fairings be Exactly aligned with the air flow.!!!!
    at 14:12, SF prop.!! bleh
    at 14:38, design has resulted in a slightly excessive distance between the prop and the wing.
    at 15:27, the amount of positive aoa at the wing mount is Excessive.!! that mistake is gonna cause the wing to make an Excess of lift and Drag.
    the wingtips Should be 'finished'; with tape or whatever. rudder control goes on the LEFT stick.! googletranslate
    the Only FT designs that are not Seriously Flawed are the masters series designs. because, those designs were NOT developed by the boy-men at FT.