Ram 1500 3.0L HURRICANE Twin-Turbo I-6 Engine | Pros Vs Cons of DUMPING the 5.7L Hemi V8

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 апр 2024
  • The 2025 Ram 1500's are coming with the Stellantis 3L inline 6 Twin-Turbo charged Hurricane engine and I Highlight the pros and the Cons of leaving behind the Iconic 5.7L Hemi. I discuss the Benefits of the smaller displacement 3L Hurricane engine like better towing, more power, better fuel economy (MPG) and less emissions. Lastly I talk about some Negative aspects of this new twin turbo charged engine in the ram 1500 truck platform as a Heavy duty mechanic.
    What I Use:
    Engine Oil - amzn.to/4aEbtNE
    Engine Oil Filter - amzn.to/3J1nDUM
    Engine Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMmMVV
    Cabin Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMZAHh
    Gear Oil - amzn.to/3PoIcxa
    Penetrating fluid - amzn.to/3EOclkx
    Rust protection - amzn.to/3Zo0Rh6
    Towing Gear:
    10 ton Pintle hitch (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3r7Axvm
    7 Ton Adjustable hitch (2" receiver) - amzn.to/46i2iAf
    Adjustable Pintle hitch mount (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3RqHGS3
    15 Ton Pintle hitch - amzn.to/45SaCqv
    10,000lbs Tie Down Straps - amzn.to/3ZBnxeh
    My Camera Gear:
    Go Pro Hero 10 - amzn.to/3ObZdJJ
    Go Pro Hero 8 - amzn.to/36grzkM
    Go Pro Accessories - amzn.to/3JLhlXo
    Sony A6400 - amzn.to/3vkqzob
    The first benefit of this inline 6 twin turbo charged engine and what I actually really like as a heavy duty mechanic is that RAM went with an inline-6 engine design. I think this type of engine design is highly advantageous for pick up trucks because it allows for great torque generation with a naturally long stroke.
    an inline-6 engine design is also wonderfully naturally balanced and leads to very nice linear power delivery. it is also much simpler then a v6 deisgn so I'm really happy to see ram go this route.
    the second benefit is towing and power, this hurricane 3L inline 6 engine with its turbos will give this ram 1500 so much more power and ideally lead to much better towing and power.
    the third benefit is the lower emissions going to be produced as well as the lower fuel economy especially around town with the smaller displacement.
    on the flip side the first con or dis-advantage of this inline 6 hurricane engine is the sound. you can't beat the sound of the 5.7L hemi and I'm going to miss it.
    the second disadvantage is simplicity, I think any turbo charged engine is going to be much more complex then a Naturally aspirated V8 like the 5.7L hemi and this added complexity could lead to worse reliability and longevity. especially with the price of trucks these days. buyers want to make sure they are getting a quality product and engine.
    the third disadvantage was a little shocking to me and that is max towing capacity has taken a large hit with these smaller 3L turbo charged engines in comparison to the 5.7L hemi. the High output version of the 3L hurricane engine is slotted to tow 2,000lbs less weight then the older v8 hemi which does not make much sense to me.
    let me know what you guys think!
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 525

  • @johnwhite5154
    @johnwhite5154 Месяц назад +54

    Wish the 5.7 was the base, the pentastar can kick rocks

    • @dawsongranger4940
      @dawsongranger4940 Месяц назад +18

      Why? It is a super reliable workhorse that does its job. Sure its no v8 but when all you need is a basic truck its perfectly adequate

    • @gtrance3567
      @gtrance3567 Месяц назад +12

      Pentistar is more reliable.

    • @erikmireles5879
      @erikmireles5879 Месяц назад +6

      Id rather have a pentastar with lower gears than be a guinea for the hurricane

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +19

      I do think the pentastar is a solid engine

    • @banginsteel4978
      @banginsteel4978 Месяц назад +7

      I like my Pentastar, great fuel economy, smooth and quiet. I don't tow anything heavy. My boat is 4000# an it does fine.

  • @kb9oak749
    @kb9oak749 Месяц назад +51

    I predict fuel economy for the I6 will be less than or equal to the v8. Turbos are great for power. Not so much for MPG.

    • @chris2901
      @chris2901 Месяц назад +4

      According the EPA, the I-6 HO 4wd gets literally the same mpg as a 1500 4wd. The non-HO I6 gets 2-3mpg more than both of those. Insanely negligible difference if its true.

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +12

      Also factor in the premium gas you’re supposed to run with those engines and now you’re paying more for fuel

    • @blackcoffee730
      @blackcoffee730 Месяц назад

      ​@@user-ju1qx9dc3w absolutely

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Месяц назад +2

      Not that much better MPG to be honest

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +1

      @@c4t-tp238 well we’ll see what the numbers are using regular gas. Probably the same as the hemi

  • @josipdolic6391
    @josipdolic6391 Месяц назад +15

    Buy your V8 till they completely disappear and keep em in shape for the next decade to prove that it was the right thing

  • @roadglide1142
    @roadglide1142 Месяц назад +53

    The reduced towing & payload tells you all you need to know about the tiny overstressed V6’s reliability! 😂 I recently picked up a new leftover 2023 Ram 2500 6.4 truck & a 2022 Dodge Scatpack 485HP Challenger 6 speed ! I’m Hemi for life ! 💪

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +13

      Its a head scratcher indeed, especially since the HO will be running 3.92 gears and the same 8 speed. Say what you want about fords 3.5 Ecoboost engine but at least they intended on it being put to work.

    • @Kenneth_R
      @Kenneth_R Месяц назад +4

      Its because of cooling limitations of the turbo engine in hotter conditions

    • @yentrader
      @yentrader Месяц назад +10

      Not a V configuration. Straight 6 much better.

    • @Kanakid
      @Kanakid Месяц назад +3

      Me too! New Power Wagon with 6.4 Hemi. I also have a Challenger with 6.4 Hemi with six speed standard. Love em all!!

    • @jdh1976sr
      @jdh1976sr Месяц назад +1

      Could it be possibly that FCA is taking a page from the Toyota playbook and severely underrating this power train for longevity? Just a thought?

  • @Sl4ck3r84
    @Sl4ck3r84 Месяц назад +4

    Well balanced video, appreciate the honesty for both pros and cons. Going to miss the HEMI, no doubt about it. Looking forward to the next video, good stuff!

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +3

      Thank you sir! lots of pros for both engines would of been nice to see both as options for the 2025 trucks. sort of like what ford has done. given both options to buyers.

  • @mcmehlen
    @mcmehlen Месяц назад +34

    Should still offer it as an option instead of entirely getting rid of the v8

    • @rj3075
      @rj3075 Месяц назад +1

      They can’t.

    • @mcmehlen
      @mcmehlen Месяц назад +9

      @@rj3075 Then why does Ford and GM still offer the 5.3 and 5.0 in addition to their boosted smaller displacement motors?

    • @khakiswag
      @khakiswag Месяц назад +7

      Ford was smart enough to keep the 5.0 available for customers who gotta have a V8. But the 5.0 is much more advanced than the HEMI so I guess it doesn’t have problems with emissions.

    • @rj3075
      @rj3075 Месяц назад +7

      @@mcmehlen The coyote and GM engines are much more advanced and efficient engines than the hemi so it’s easier for the those to pass emissions.

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- Месяц назад +1

      @@khakiswag .. Copy That ..

  • @rockymountainjazzfan1822
    @rockymountainjazzfan1822 Месяц назад +33

    The 5.7 Hemi has one fatal flaw--idling destroys it way ahead of its time. Law enforcement where I lived used Ram 1500s with the Hemi. Because of all of the radios, computer equipment, emergency lighting, etc., those trucks, by necessity, were left running for hours at a time--with a lot of idling. Those Hemi engines rarely lasted 100K miles in that application--the lack of adequate oil lubrication at idle caused the engines to wear excessively and fail early, even with good maintenance and frequent oil changes. To be fair, no current generation GDI gas engine will tolerate extended idling very well at all. The only reason that so many current generation vehicles are going to smaller displacement turbocharged engines is because the smaller displacement uses less fuel at idle and low RPM, and the EPA fuel economy test regimen is biased toward "city" driving cycles, where idling and low RPM operation are common.

    • @darkglide24
      @darkglide24 Месяц назад +5

      I think I seen somewhere hemis have to be around 1500rpm for everything to be lubricated correctly.

    • @okcmoparguy724
      @okcmoparguy724 Месяц назад +6

      Idling doesn't hurt the hemi, it's changing the oil based on miles instead of hours when it's idled for long durations. The ones we see with cam/lifter issues all have a lot of hours yet still getting oil changes every 6000-7000 miles. The owners get an oil change message on the cluster but ignore or reset it. By the time a service is performed the oil is worn out and can't provide sufficient lubrication. If the guage cluster tells you to change the oil it's not wrong.

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +14

      Ya agreed I think its very fair to say idling the Hemi's were an issue. it was not a perfect engine. that being said I would much rather idle a hemi then a twin turbo engine for 8 hours. Very interesting about the EPA testing, I want to look more into that. thank you.

    • @DH-hp7nv
      @DH-hp7nv Месяц назад +3

      @@okcmoparguy724
      I will say that where i am, our fleet garage mandates oil change every 4k miles. Zero excuses, suspension is a likely disciplinary action. But even at 4k mile oil changes, we have so many issues with any hemi. The pentastar v6 is holding up much better.

    • @DH-hp7nv
      @DH-hp7nv Месяц назад +4

      I will agree to a degree. No matter how soon the intervals of maitenance, those hemis have been nothing but trouble. I recall my 2012 charger needing two new engines and one top end job. The ford v6 in the explorer has been the most reliable in years. But no matter what, those long hours of sitting on the job at idle is detrimental on all of them.

  • @JustSomeGuy641
    @JustSomeGuy641 Месяц назад +32

    Chop off 2 cylinders add immense complexity take away standard features charge 20+k more. Great idea.

    • @bryanmiller5692
      @bryanmiller5692 Месяц назад +2

      Immense complexity?? lol turbos are not complex 😂😂

    • @JustSomeGuy641
      @JustSomeGuy641 Месяц назад

      @bryanmiller5692 depends on how far they bury them. But your right kind of maybe

    • @dal6243
      @dal6243 11 дней назад

      @@bryanmiller5692it means higher maintenance and more frequent oil changes

  • @SWATT101
    @SWATT101 Месяц назад +13

    No replacement for displacement... Fiat and quality lol...good one

  • @eugenex.p.3430
    @eugenex.p.3430 Месяц назад +3

    Thanks Alex for another freaking good truck video. 👍

  • @jpadilla21
    @jpadilla21 Месяц назад +23

    I just bought a Ram Rebel GT (defected from ford). Love the Hemi!

  • @realcdcruze3558
    @realcdcruze3558 Месяц назад +18

    Buy a used V8 from the South without rust and keep it running. I think there is a reason why people are keeping old trucks longer and potentially replacing the engines if the body is sound. In the North, unfortunately, the body and frame will go before the engine no matter what rust protection you do.

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +6

      the salt and de-icer they now use is just so tough on the vehicles. I get my truck undercoated twice a year and get under every oil change to spray down surface rust. but its a losing battle.

    • @2500mike
      @2500mike Месяц назад

      ​@@TheGettyAdventures Definitely helps though and from what I have seen can save frames for 20+ years. Fenders and cab corners maybe not as well. But that's much easier to replace

    • @pahillbillypappysteve2357
      @pahillbillypappysteve2357 22 дня назад

      live in snow belt mountains of pa and get krown rust proofing done for the past 5 years and my ram looks great so far. I take it once a year and get it done. I am doing it to the wife's subaru accent since 2020 and it looks great also. I recommend krown rust proofing if u want to keep something.

    • @ctfan1486
      @ctfan1486 9 дней назад

      A dodge without rust? Thats funny

    • @pahillbillypappysteve2357
      @pahillbillypappysteve2357 9 дней назад

      @@ctfan1486 it is a ram without rust thanks to Krown!

  • @LindsayPeters987
    @LindsayPeters987 Месяц назад +12

    Love how digestable your videos are. New shop looks great!

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      Thank you Lindsay, you should come by sometime and check it out

  • @colbiecolbie6979
    @colbiecolbie6979 Месяц назад +6

    I hope my PW lasts me forever! Hasn’t seen a winter yet since “17. Central Ontario. Great stuff keeper going

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +3

      I would love the keep the PW off the road in the winter but the roads get nasty up here and it warms my heart knowing I have the best truck for the job when the snow flies.

  • @ColJonSquall1
    @ColJonSquall1 Месяц назад +15

    The issue with the H/O Inline 6, is Ram is locking it behind premium trims. If they were to offer it on a base work truck, then it would likely tow more. The biggest negative for towing is content, the more you load up a truck, the less it can tow. As all those creature comforts and luxury items, add weight to the frame, which in turn takes away from capacity. The 2025's towing overall being lower, is likely due to all the new features being added, including autonomous driving, all those new modules/computer systems add weight.

    • @darkglide24
      @darkglide24 Месяц назад +4

      That’s about like gm and the 6.2. I would like a rcsb with a 6.2 or even a 5.3. You can only get the 2.7 or what ever the 4 cylinder is in short box.

    • @dylanbailey2812
      @dylanbailey2812 Месяц назад +2

      I feel like if that added weight noticeably detracts from your engine's performance, then your engine is too small to begin with

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      thats probably all very true, but Its a tough look.

    • @bikerevolutiontv
      @bikerevolutiontv Месяц назад +1

      I heard that this motor that also comes in the wagoner has 24 pounds of boost. My prediction is that these motors will not last. My 15 liter Cummins will max out around 25 pounds. 25 is too much for this little dodge

    • @johnhahn8464
      @johnhahn8464 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@dylanbailey2812it not that it takes away performance it's all about gvwr. If the gvwr is 12k the added d.features weigh more and take away from that 12k. A tailgate with the convenient step is rough 1k by itself so options weigh more unfortunately

  • @BurchellAtTheWharf
    @BurchellAtTheWharf Месяц назад +3

    The new 3L has me getting the eco diesel vibes, I wonder how narrow the mains and rod bearings are gonna be😅

  • @blueheelerfriend8450
    @blueheelerfriend8450 Месяц назад +14

    I really wish Ford had used the straight six in their new F-150s instead of a V6 as well...😊 I've had a few different cars and trucks with straight sixes and they were always the most reliable/smooth running engines for me.

    • @tinleo333
      @tinleo333 Месяц назад +2

      So now the Ram is i6 also Mercedes and Mazda using it. I6>v6.

    • @zBPS
      @zBPS 29 дней назад

      The ecoboost is already pretty good as is, but it could probably be so much better with an I6

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      @@zBPS I think ford went with the v6 instead of an inline 6 is because it is a dimensionally smaller engine. Possibly the in-line wouldn’t fit in the current engine compartments. Who knows, only ford does I guess

  • @nigelhenry5741
    @nigelhenry5741 Месяц назад +3

    Why not offer both. The loyal traditional v8 engine guy can get a simpler to work on engine and the new engine can break in over time with newer truck buyers who never had a hemi with that wonderful sound. Ford figured it out and as far as I know, Ford offers both. Guess that is why they outsell everyone.

  • @austinkeen4577
    @austinkeen4577 Месяц назад +32

    The hemi is easily one of the engines of all time. Love mine more every day!

    • @SoonerMikeD
      @SoonerMikeD Месяц назад +16

      Definitely one of the engines of all time 😆

    • @jimmyneutron3055
      @jimmyneutron3055 Месяц назад +10

      Yep most recognizable at the shop for ticking sound

    • @imabebebebe2496
      @imabebebebe2496 Месяц назад +8

      I'd argue it's the most engine of all time.

    • @cyclonicblade
      @cyclonicblade Месяц назад +1

      The 6.1 sure.

    • @BabyGators
      @BabyGators Месяц назад +13

      Not only that, it's the engine ever. A truly

  • @sarrum7696
    @sarrum7696 Месяц назад +2

    Very happy with my 2020 Rebel and it's 5.7l Hemi. 🥰

  • @brandon9715
    @brandon9715 Месяц назад +60

    Everyone wanting V8s that had actual reliability, remember that when you vote this November.

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Месяц назад +9

      Exactly mate, Trump 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @matthewdievendorf9609
      @matthewdievendorf9609 15 дней назад

      Shut up with you politics. I'm voting for Biden and I still will keep my ram with the 5.7 and will still purchase the new ram 1500 with the inline 6 cylinder.

    • @robweaver1923
      @robweaver1923 5 дней назад

      @@matthewdievendorf9609 Perfect liberal response, "Shut up".

  • @vr4787
    @vr4787 Месяц назад +8

    I’m going to hold onto my Ram 1500 Hemi Classic as long as possible. I just like how it purrs and how simple it is to modify and work on. It does everything I need the truck to do while getting decent mpg. Can’t ask for anything more, and I even managed to pay it off early when they were going for $32k.

  • @privateer9181
    @privateer9181 Месяц назад +7

    when the waranty expires on these Direct injected turbo inside no dipstick engines.. good luck

  • @sw5334
    @sw5334 Месяц назад +5

    If you can only get the high output on the top trim levels then that explains the lower tow rating and payload. Those trucks are heavier so naturally the payload and towing goes down.

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +2

      it does make some sense but you see fords big boy 3.5L ecoboost offered in almost every trim level and a tow rating of like 14k. I don't understand why they wouldn't at least make it an option for someone looking to tow in a lower trim.

    • @sw5334
      @sw5334 Месяц назад

      @@TheGettyAdventures good point. That’s a huge difference. That’s going to be sending people to ford for sure. I’m surprised the difference.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      @@TheGettyAdventures it’s all about the $$$🙂 unfortunately

  • @aarons307
    @aarons307 Месяц назад +1

    Your spot on from the duty cycle perspective. The new 3.0 Hurricane will not reject heat as well as the 5.7 Hemi. That is a topic a RAM engineer discussed in a podcast I listened on Pickup Truck Plus SUV Talk. Guess we'll see in a year or two from now how it performs when being worked. Could be just one of those "designer" type of engines made for short towing trips... IDK?

  • @dd5744
    @dd5744 Месяц назад

    Can’t wait to see you do a tow test with one. Would love to see a test with the standard output and the high output just to see the difference between the two.

  • @richardkent9621
    @richardkent9621 Месяц назад +7

    RELIABILITY !!!! That is the only thing that REALLY matters with this new engine. I would not touch one of these engines for at least 3 years. I have a 2011 F150 but I like Ram also. Can't afford a new truck at these prices, so hope I can keep mine going.

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Месяц назад +2

      Nice, is you're F150 a 5.0 or an EcoBoost?

    • @rickkent4367
      @rickkent4367 Месяц назад +1

      5L so far been a decent truck other than 3 broken springs, driveshaft, and a lack of heat in the winter. Think it’s better now but still doesn’t put out a ton of heat

    • @johnhahn8464
      @johnhahn8464 Месяц назад

      ​@@rickkent4367what springs broke? How'd the driveshaft break and at what mileage? Are you referring to the u-joints? Any idea what's wrong with the heater? All very interesting

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      Then again doesn’t Ram have a 3 yr bumper to bumper warranty?

  • @marshallgerow3277
    @marshallgerow3277 Месяц назад +2

    You should be able to test one soon we have a lot of the 2025 1500 standard output units on the lots here in grand rapids MI.

  • @davidleslie949
    @davidleslie949 Месяц назад +3

    I am enjoying the video so far. The only discrepancy is where you've made reference to the ability for the new ram 1500 to tow less weight than the newer ram with a bigger displacement of horsepower and torque. The rated towing capacity of any vehicle has absolutely nothing to do with the engine, or the displacement of the engine or the amount of torque. It has everything to do with the building for the vehicle to stop by using the breaking system in the vehicle in order to safely tow a load at the maximum rated capacity. Some of the heavier duty models with larger breaking systems. Have your suspension will be able to tow more than a standard RAM REBEL would be able to based on the building for the vehicle able to come to a stopping position safely within a certain distance. A vehicle is up to speed. Vehicles in motion in order to stay in motion it needs very little engine displacement and that's where the 3 L comes into effect where once the ram 1500 with in-line 6 cylinder is up it doesn't need much to keep it going to keep momentum. Getting up to speed that's where the turbo chargers come into play. so often people are interpreting or misunderstanding what the rated tow capacity of any vehicle. It's so based on the ability for that vehicle to come to a stop safely with maximum rated towing hall in the back of the vehicle and also in the bed of the truck. We've all done it put too much weight in the back of our pick up truck and noticed how much longer it takes to get up to speed and back down to speed when breaking. This is clear evidence of a vehicle, needing more breaking ability on the weight being towed or loaded in the back of the pick up truck directly over the rear axle. This is why people are having a lot of difficulty understanding how vehicle with more rated horsepower and more rated torque can actually tow less than the original ram 1500 platform. Hope this helps everyone but it's just that simple how rated the rated capacity of any vehicle is calculated. Keep in mind that in order to meet the EPA standards for missions. The vehicle also needs to be lighter, and could be at the sacrifice of suspension, steering and breaking components of a vehicle. Steering and stopping are the two most critical systems in any vehicle for safety but Could come at a loss of vehicle performance in a towing situation. 90% of pick up truck owners with myself included do not need all that horsepower and torque on a daily basis. 90% of the vehicle sales are too non-commercial drivers of the ram 1500. That being said, I think this is what Stellantis was banking on, and then the commercial pick up truck portion could be compensated with the diesel option which is better suited for towing capacity loads based on the amount of torque, a diesel engine is able to produce given power band compression ignited or TDI ENGINE ON THE ABILITY FOR THE FUEL INJECTORS TO START INJECTING FUEL BEFORE TDC & well after TDC of the engines pistons. Diesel engines are much an electric motor, except for the responsiveness of diesel engines, but once under load quickly compensate for the power lag Once underload. Great video I enjoy the content.. keep up the great work!

    • @chuckz8053
      @chuckz8053 20 дней назад

      Heat soak from power density on long, steep grades is what's at play.

  • @tomdrew5818
    @tomdrew5818 Месяц назад +3

    Im already seeing deealer tech complaints about overheating issues with these on the Jeep forums (Grand Cherokees etc.)

  • @boatstuffintheglen7518
    @boatstuffintheglen7518 Месяц назад +3

    great video. good coverage of the pros and cons of the hurricane. I think it will work for the 1500 trucks. The lower towing is not a big deal, over 7K towing should be using a hd truck.
    Wondering what you think about the future of HD trucks. Cummins has the same block with gas, diesel, hydrogen, etc. for their next gen engines. Could that be the replacement for the 6.4 hemi?

  • @Kingswood7189
    @Kingswood7189 Месяц назад +1

    Even though my '04 durango (5.7l v8) gets only ~14 mpg mixed, its less costly to fill her up than to make a monthly payment while getting 2-3 mpg better (presumably). Especially after having a magnaflow 3" in/3" out exhaust installed, that v8 rumble is amazing. My only real gripe with the "hemi" is having 16 sparkplugs, but she works. Just my $0.02. :)

  • @IcanDriveIt
    @IcanDriveIt Месяц назад +2

    Inline 6s are awesome, especially turbo ones. I have a V8 dodge Ram now, and seeing as everyone is upset about the hurricane powered rams, I might score a deal on one

  • @parrott350
    @parrott350 Месяц назад +12

    The V8 is dead. Long Live the V8 ! climate con by the EPA, Battery trucks LOL Good video Alex

  • @agerardomp
    @agerardomp Месяц назад

    Greetings Alex.
    Of course I love V8 ... Nothing like that sound challenging specially HEMI.
    BUT I recognize that one of the main objectives is heavy lifting, which is increasingly difficult to load and tow. In that sense I go with the best efficiency and effectiveness and respect for the environment. Totally agree with your analysis of advantages and disadvantages.
    I love the Rebel diésel engine ⛽ 😮
    BIG HUG and thank's to share yours videos!! 😊

  • @grahamrothphotography
    @grahamrothphotography Месяц назад +5

    Love my hemi in my 11 jeep GC, in getting a used new to me rear diff, limited slip clutches wore out (215,000kms) I have a 2024 GMC Sierra 5.3L rental, engine is so quiet, good power. But lacks the v8 growl

    • @jameseroh6544
      @jameseroh6544 Месяц назад +1

      Get the Trutrac LSD. The Trutrac is a gear type and work very well. If you stick with the clutch type, use Lucas Synthetic gear Lube. The performance difference is quite good. My '03 Ford Explorer has the clutch type LSD. The Lucas Synthetic gear Lube has it running strong at 227,000 miles. My '96 ZJ has a Dana 44 with the gear type LSD. It is my most capable 4wd out in the desert. My '23 Jeep JLU will get Trutracs front and rear.

  • @ridewot
    @ridewot Месяц назад +1

    I recognized parents country store you were at the gas station😊 Caswell Maine !!

  • @garyvanpatten3947
    @garyvanpatten3947 Месяц назад

    Will keep building it .

  • @nordlandak6853
    @nordlandak6853 Месяц назад +5

    I noticed the e torque system is gone in the SST. Seems strange after all the effort to develop the 48v system.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP Месяц назад +1

      I dont think there was really that much effort put into that system.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад +1

      That was a gimmick to begin with, it basically helped out their ridiculous stop/start system

  • @RC.56
    @RC.56 Месяц назад +4

    I’ve never owned a truck, but snagged a 23 1500 limited night with Hemi. Plush. Love it.

  • @chadmiller6487
    @chadmiller6487 Месяц назад +1

    Any idea if they'll replace the 6.4 in the HD?

  • @vinnyivanov2906
    @vinnyivanov2906 Месяц назад +2

    Working in a professional auto shop, the hemi tick is not overblown. It was not only v8 but also v6 plagued with that. We repair at least 1 a week

    • @LeadStarDude
      @LeadStarDude 3 дня назад +1

      Yeah mixing VVT with MDS really borked the Hemi engines. Yeah they gained both power and fuel economy, but I would always trade both for reliability. Glad I have a 2005 model. One thing I recommend is swapping out the oil pump to a high flow pump. That eliminates most of the issue because it is typically caused by poor oil flow at idle. You can put the original pressure spring in there to prevent getting too much oil pressure, but still have better oil flow at idle. Which protect the lifters and cam from the dreaded "hemi tick".

  • @bradtoepfer289
    @bradtoepfer289 Месяц назад +4

    Honestly, 1/2 ton trucks are mainly for hauling your butt around…or smaller trailers, 4 wheeler trailers, etc. When you get to 10,000 pounds on a half ton, it can be a little scary. If you want to tow 10k or more safely and without worry, you’ll want the 2500 anyway.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      Agree, a 1/2 ton pulling 10k lb trailers is really kinda out of its league

    • @gregdcross
      @gregdcross 8 дней назад

      IMHO, 1/2 ton is safe to pull a trailer to 5,000 lbs. 5K-10K a 3/4 tin pickup. Over 10K, get a 1 ton or larger. Not because of the power train, but brakes and the heft of the frame and suspension.

  • @jasonnourry9612
    @jasonnourry9612 Месяц назад +2

    What do you think of having a aluminum engine block? Instead of a graphite iron block like in a diesel.

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +3

      lighter first of all, but for a forced induction engine in a pick up truck meant for "work" you would like to see an iron block something like what ford did with the 2.7L ecoboost. granted the 3.5L ecoboost which has been around for years seems to run just fine with aluminum block.

  • @wakeboarder9180
    @wakeboarder9180 Месяц назад

    Great video, it just confirms that my next new truck will be a V8 GM or Ford

  • @jw8578
    @jw8578 Месяц назад +1

    Interesting point you make, more HP and less towing capacity.

  • @steinjosh1
    @steinjosh1 Месяц назад

    Do you know if you can use a snowplow with the Hurricane engine? I’ve heard maybe not because of the air induction needs of the turbos.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      Then again most folks don’t snowplow with 1/2 ton trucks, always going for the 3/4 ton

    • @steinjosh1
      @steinjosh1 27 дней назад

      @@pathunter7003 lots of people do here. They make good v plows now that are made for 1500 trucks.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 27 дней назад

      @@steinjosh1 you may want to check if the warranty is voided when using a plow on a 1/2 ton. The transmission makes a lot of heat when plowing, they would require a “snowplow pkg” on a 3/4 ton yrs ago and it included heavier frt end springs and a large trans cooler among other bits

  • @jasonbrushett2005
    @jasonbrushett2005 Месяц назад +4

    No, we all are not going to miss the rumble.My neighbor has the same truck as your test rig,dear Lord,I can hear that every morning on startup! I wish he'd get rid of it lol. I think the Hurricane is going to be a winner for Ram.As for dropping 1000lbs ,I think that's a non issue because most 1/2 ton tow ratings are inflated,especially with Ram and its coil springs.The Hurricane will make the Hemi a thing of the past.I'm a Ford Ecoboost guy,kudos to 🐏. I'm excited to try one.

  • @quicksilverb1
    @quicksilverb1 Месяц назад +12

    i had the new tundra 3.5 and blew it after 13k miles. Bought a ram and never looked back. the 5.7 is legendary, the transmission is definitely the weak link of the truck though

    • @benderman55
      @benderman55 Месяц назад +16

      The ZF8HP70 is one of the best transmissions every built?

    • @quicksilverb1
      @quicksilverb1 Месяц назад

      @benderman55 I haven't had that experience with it. I have 10k miles on my 1500 and the upshifts and downshifts are rough I'm guessing due to synchros which would get worse over time I'm assuming

    • @benderman55
      @benderman55 Месяц назад +13

      @@quicksilverb1 Not sure what your talking about, there are no synchrows as you would say inside this transmission, and if there are only 10k miles on it, why would you not take it in for warranty. This is the only good transmission that dodge has ever had, because it was designed and built by ZF

    • @alainaguilar9938
      @alainaguilar9938 Месяц назад

      5.7 is a joke. Legendarily a cam and lifter muncher. More like Nopar

    • @quicksilverb1
      @quicksilverb1 Месяц назад

      @@benderman55 All automatics have synchro mechanics

  • @nhbountyhunter
    @nhbountyhunter Месяц назад

    My 07 ram 2500 has 379k. OG drivetrain. It tows everyday. It a single vehicle short haul (within 300 miles 1 way) transporter. Even if a drivetrain component goes bad I will just replace it versus buying a new truck these days. Does have a little rust forming on the bed but I have a friend that's a body guy and we are currently completely stripping it down to bare metal and repainting it and fixing all the rest.

  • @rmkscrambler
    @rmkscrambler Месяц назад +4

    TFL. Ask a Ram engineer about the lower tow ratings. He said it was due to heat dissipation.

    • @802Garage
      @802Garage Месяц назад

      Yeah my guess would be too much torque generation at low RPM from high load spooling the turbos like crazy means lots of risk of pinging and trying to bend rods.

    • @rmkscrambler
      @rmkscrambler Месяц назад +1

      @802Garage the way he explained it was more to do with duty cycle. Basically if you pulled the same load as the hemi and the driver controlled himself at the same speeds as the hemi. There wouldn't be an issue. But because the 3.0L will pull harder if the driver pushed it harder with the heavier loads. He would see operating Temps that while "safe" would make most drivers uncomfortable. So they backed off the tow rating for a more "controlled user experience".
      I'm guessing it has alot to due with a greater safety margin on a new engine until they have more data to ramp the tow ratings up in the future.

    • @802Garage
      @802Garage Месяц назад

      @@rmkscrambler Right makes sense. I would just think the highest risk would be when you're trying to get moving with the heavier load vs when there's momentum. At the same time, sudden and prolonged acceleration or towing up long hills for example could cause similar problems. Makes sense.

  • @chrisparco9599
    @chrisparco9599 25 дней назад +1

    I have a 2013 ram 1500,R/T 395 hp 6 spd 4.10 gears & 22in wheels
    All factory, maintenance is key &
    I use all synthetic in everything .
    I am an avid hemi person ever since they came out even before
    With the max-wedge ,I think it will
    Hurt the brand going total 6cyl
    They will definitely loose customer base

  • @kjfishman547
    @kjfishman547 Месяц назад +1

    Very informative video. How many people tow over 11k pounds with a 1/2 ton truck? If I had the need to tow that much weight I would have a 3/4 ton truck. All the new trucks have exceeded what I would be willing to pay so my old 2010 4.7L Dakota won't be replaced anytime soon.

  • @Kanakid
    @Kanakid Месяц назад +5

    I love the Hemi! Very little gain going to the turbo six. I have the Hemi Etorque. Love it!

    • @user-ot5mr8wq5l
      @user-ot5mr8wq5l Месяц назад +1

      Same, I have a 22' Limited with the 5.7 etorque. Love it so far and have 0 issues with it.

  • @chris2901
    @chris2901 Месяц назад +2

    What's the point in even having the HO if you lose towing and MPG, what was the goal there? You gain more HP and torque but if it doesn't go to towing, then I'm confused. Does the engine have to have that much more power to feed the seat massagers and heads up displays? Laramie to Limited Longhorn/Limited can be 10k-20k more, but what's the actual gain besides the nice interior?

    • @erikmireles5879
      @erikmireles5879 Месяц назад +1

      Agree. Kinda sad Mopar was always about the most power for less and offered the stronger motor in all trims and configuration. Feel Mopar is going away from their roots.

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +1

      You gain complexity and the ability to beat a few more people to red lights in your truck 👍

    • @johnhahn8464
      @johnhahn8464 Месяц назад

      It's all about gvwr. Whatever the gvwr is the more options weigh lbs and take away from the gvwr. Everyone thinks towing only has to do with power. You have to be able to stop all that weight. There are so many other factors. Brakes suspension frame weight etc.... most don't know the parking brake has to hold the entire load on a flat surface when the mfr determines gvwr

  • @FastEdE1968
    @FastEdE1968 14 дней назад

    @thegettyadventures - Which full size pick up (1/2 ton) would you recommend for 2024 w/engine? (exclude Toyota) I appreciate your advice, cool chanel!!

  • @JohnSmith-ev1sm
    @JohnSmith-ev1sm Месяц назад +6

    My guess is cooling related. You can't put that kind of power out with high compression and turbos and keep it cool enough while towing. The 5.7 survived in the 2500's for years, it's a beast. Try that with these turbos, they are basically glorified car engines wound up to level 11. Not good.

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- Месяц назад +1

      From the ST helm.... Mr. Scott, I need more cooling ..... or the other way around .... Had better have a Top Shelf ZF gearbox behind it. ....

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +5

      Agreed, too much temp and cylinder pressures for extended time is going to make something go boom. but looking at ford they somehow have made it work with the ecoboost.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP Месяц назад +3

      Modern half tons are basically family cars. These will do fine for the average use case which is mostly daily driving with a bit of towing thrown in.

  • @sw5334
    @sw5334 Месяц назад +3

    Are we going to see more videos of your power wagon?

  • @xXSnikrzXx
    @xXSnikrzXx Месяц назад

    Do you have a 2024 F150 power boost review?

  • @Devlins10
    @Devlins10 Месяц назад +2

    My 2015 ram sport 1500 5.7 is paid for at 140k and im gonna drive it until she blows lol

  • @MetalPhoenix79
    @MetalPhoenix79 Месяц назад

    Is there any less of a concern with the engine since it has been in the Grand Wagoneer since 23? I realize that isn't the longest time and probably not a lot of towing but I haven't heard anything bad about the engine as far as reliability goes, yet.

  • @joecygon2287
    @joecygon2287 Месяц назад +1

    It'll be just Like the Eco 6 Diesel. A big.🎉

  • @ojbarberena7090
    @ojbarberena7090 Месяц назад +4

    Tell us about your new shop

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      she's small but mighty! still playing around with some stuff but really looking forward to making it my own.

  • @j.m.1259
    @j.m.1259 Месяц назад +2

    Did a lot of comparison between the 5.7 and the 3.6 prior to purchasing my truck in January. Ended up with a tradesman with the Warlock package and the 3.6. Perfect truck for my application. Hellcat challenger in m6t incoming. Save the manuals and v8s

  • @Infernostar18
    @Infernostar18 10 дней назад

    I love i6 engines. Honestly, its a good step.

  • @kuhndog-1196
    @kuhndog-1196 Месяц назад +3

    My biggest thing is mpg. The 1 or 2 gain isn't worth the eventually breakage. I mean keep it simple stupid. Over complicated systems are always bound to have more issues than a pushrod v8. I'm really disappointed and saddened by dodge killing the v8. The 6.4 is on borrowed time now. They say there is a 6.7 gas cummins coming but I'm not too sure it's going to be that much better in terms of fuel economy. Long live the v8 and bring back the manual trans.

  • @matthewmiller2268
    @matthewmiller2268 Месяц назад +1

    What if they installed the Speed Of Air dimpled/thermal coated pistons? I believe that would be the greatest investment to keep the Hemi engine around. A torque cam would help too and getting rid of the displacement on demand junk which has been an intense bone of contention with these engines. I'm putting more efficient injectors in as well for greater fuel atomization which leads to ultra vaporized air/fuel mix which lowers emissions and increases output/fuel economy.

  • @jamesmcintire3800
    @jamesmcintire3800 Месяц назад +1

    As much as I love the 5.7 Hemi I am somewhat optimistic about Dodge’s future. As mentioned this Hurricane straight 6 should be very reliable as inline 6’s usually do have an advantage in reliability and how easily they produce torque. As mentioned an inline 6 is a superior design than a V8 in most applications. I am however skeptical about turbocharged engines from any automaker.

  • @michaelpopp6340
    @michaelpopp6340 Месяц назад +1

    Rams hemi sounded great, but had a crappy powerband (needed to be revved hard to get any real performance). Hurricane will likely be half the rpm towing a load up a grade like the 3.5 ecoboost.
    Hurricane should be great as long as it's well engineered and has quality components. Low payload and towing numbers tell me the cheap components were likely used in the new hurricane.
    Fuel mileage should also improve significantly. I struggled with my 2014 cc 4x4 3.92 hemi to ever break 20 highway even though the trucks lie o meter would tell me 22 or 23.

  • @shredfactorgaming
    @shredfactorgaming 15 дней назад

    Were you driving in Fredericton NB?? If not that bridge looks like Westmoreland Bridge.

  • @fredgarvin7033
    @fredgarvin7033 Месяц назад +2

    I^ are notorious for head gasket leaks and exhaust leaks unless they split the out in two. In saying that some of my favorite engines are strait 6's in the past but they were never as reliable for work in my experience as far as needing repairs per mile

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +3

      Cat used to split them in 3 lol but all the modern big diesels use a single head.

  • @jacob.calloway6833
    @jacob.calloway6833 Месяц назад

    I love that you mentioned why I6 engines are better torque monsters. I believe with our technology combined with an old simple work horse engine design, the world can absolutely benefit. I6 for the win!

  • @paulfindude8743
    @paulfindude8743 Месяц назад

    I’ve read that the new hurricane will also have MDS. I don’t know why the heck it would. What do you think about that?

  • @DynoSauR4Truth
    @DynoSauR4Truth Месяц назад +2

    Both Toyota and Ford went with a larger 6 cylinder. 3 liters is still a little small.

  • @eliaskefalas373
    @eliaskefalas373 Месяц назад

    What about the running cost on this new I6 do a price breakdown based on the premium fuel you need to run and compare it to the mpg

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      "they say" you can run regular fuel on the SO but I would imagine it would impact fuel economy and performance.

    • @eliaskefalas373
      @eliaskefalas373 Месяц назад

      @@TheGettyAdventures I wonder how it would impact under towing conditions

  • @24cupsandcounting
    @24cupsandcounting Месяц назад +1

    I drive a Hemi as a work truck and tbh it isn't that great, lots of roar but not really quick and it isn't very easy on gas. I have driven all of the half-ton trucks and the Hemi is by far the worst gas guzzler I have ever driven. 19 litres per 100 kms.

  • @daviddawkins2272
    @daviddawkins2272 28 дней назад

    where do i mount the mail box? at those prices i would have to live in it.

  • @michaelburke3731
    @michaelburke3731 Месяц назад

    I wonder if the HO has less towing and payload because the HO is so far only available in higher trim levels that are heavier?

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      Thats certainly a reason I would think. but even the fact that the SO engine with still significantly more power then the Hemi cannot tow as much going through the same driveline is a little odd.

  • @frederickdouglass7517
    @frederickdouglass7517 Месяц назад

    Personally, I'm looking forward to it. As someone who owned three RAMs(2015,2017,2020) all with the HEMI I thought it was a pretty powerful engine until I drove an F150 with the 3.5 Ecoboost and man it had some serious power! I currently have an F150 with the 5.0 Coyote and while it is definitely more powerful than the Hemi it is no match for the Ecoboost. My question is, how much more does the RAM weigh than a similarly equipped F!50 and will the performance be roughly on par with the Ecoboost. I would truly love to come back to the smooth riding RAM but it was going to take more power to do it and this could be it.

  • @michaelschneider-
    @michaelschneider- Месяц назад +3

    Long live the inline 6cyl... With a couple of turbochargers? .. What's not to like! .. As much bravado as the Hemi's deservedly gets,,,, it ain't making EPA requirements. .. The manufacturer is paying the EPA through the nose for each V8 sold. .. "Between a rock and a hard place" .. Enter.. the inline 6cly TT. .. Exhaust note? .. Have a listen to a late 1990s MB inline 3.6 6cly; C-Class 3.6 AMG... its exhaust note is F-King glorious. ..
    P.S., Are we seeing a Turbo trend with the manufacturers? .. Sure' nuff..

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +1

      There’s already lots of videos out there of the sound. It’s not an AMG … it sounds like a Tacoma

  • @Low12Sun
    @Low12Sun Месяц назад

    Thank goodness the Power Wagons will keep the Hemi for a while

  • @jamesgeorge4874
    @jamesgeorge4874 19 дней назад

    Glad I don't work at CDJR dealer.
    I did when the Pentastar launched. Cylinder heads for days.

  • @toddcoon6734
    @toddcoon6734 29 дней назад

    I suspect Stellantis de-rated the tow ratings on the 3.0 to avoid paying warranty claims especially on a first year model. I also suspect for 2026 they will roll out "enhanced" tow ratings equivalent to or better than the 5.7 HEMI. Only time will tell on the actual reliability of this new engine, although the design concept appears sound.

  • @DH-hp7nv
    @DH-hp7nv Месяц назад

    Well thats one more vehicle to mark off the possibility list.

  • @MONGO573
    @MONGO573 6 дней назад

    I’m hearing that they have to use high octane fuel in the hurricane to run efficiently, but I can’t confirm that

  • @stingcool9455
    @stingcool9455 Месяц назад +7

    I'd like to give the inline 6 a shot, but not at $80,000. Maybe in 10-15 years i can get a used one for under 10k in today's numbers.

    • @marshallforeman2051
      @marshallforeman2051 Месяц назад +5

      It will never last 10 years, not suppose to last 10 years , it’s all disposable now, Iam still trying to figure out how that’s good for the environment

    • @blackcoffee730
      @blackcoffee730 Месяц назад

      ​@marshallforeman2051 definitely not going to last 10 years. Everything is designed to fall apart so you buy more. Government doesn't care about the environment. It's financially beneficial for them to push the green agenda but none of their agenda benefits the environment.

  • @timothykeith1367
    @timothykeith1367 Месяц назад +1

    Inline sixes have smooth torque because there is always a power stroke with six separate crankpins

  • @DJ2226
    @DJ2226 Месяц назад

    Emissions are a close secondary reason behind the move from the Hemi. It looks a bit more like a cost-saving measure. The 3L I6 is a six-cylinder version of the 2L I4, and the four-cylinder is used in A TON of vehicles in the Stellantis family already and more emissions compliment than both the Hemi and Pentastar which is probably on its way out as well. Instead of updating the Hemi, it was cheaper and more accessible for them to add two cylinders to the I4. They can make both on the same assembly line in Mexico and maintain two versions of the I6 instead of 3 different displacements of the Hemi with several other tunes. The I4 already surpasses the Pentastar's torque numbers and almost matches its HP, so between the I4 and I6s, it essentially makes the V6s and V8s "obsolete." With the I4 being so widely used with so many of Stellantis's vehicles, I can bet that the Pentastar is also probably on the chopping block, and when you consider the EPA fines from the Hemi, Stellantis has effectively killed four birds with one stone.

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +2

      The pentastar is going to be a battery charging range extender on the Ramcharger hybrid lol

    • @DJ2226
      @DJ2226 Месяц назад

      @@user-ju1qx9dc3w Oh wow. I was unaware of that. Thanks for passing that onto me.

  • @daytona3927
    @daytona3927 Месяц назад

    Ram should make a low buck hot rod version, a regular cab with the H/O Hurricane, that would be cool.

  • @TechKnightOne
    @TechKnightOne Месяц назад +3

    Chrysler is pretty much saying they don't have much faith in the engineering they've done. Just dumb/lower down all the weight ratings instead of making something worth a dang for an engine.
    Prime example of this is when they did all the same marketing for the eco diesel.
    I due for a new pickup unfortunately it's down to two companies Ford and Toyota.

    • @TheGettyAdventures
      @TheGettyAdventures  Месяц назад +1

      Well I'm a pretty big fan of the 5L from ford but Toyota does stand behind their product so I think either one will serve you well. and exactly the eco diesel was such a disaster but hopefully they learned and put out a good engine. time will tell.

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- Месяц назад +2

      She-it, Stellantis fired 3/4 of its N. American engineering staff recently ...

    • @TechKnightOne
      @TechKnightOne Месяц назад +1

      @TheGettyAdventures I've watched all your videos, even the older ones before I found your channel. So there way a nice back log of vides to watch. Keep up the good work. Thanks

    • @TechKnightOne
      @TechKnightOne Месяц назад +1

      @michaelschneider- doesn't surprise me, nothing really done in the USA or Canada anymore. It's very sad all the work is overseas and with ai and robots becoming better and better time will tell what work is left.

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- Месяц назад +1

      @@TechKnightOne .. Copy that..

  • @danielbonner8309
    @danielbonner8309 Месяц назад +1

    I saw a video where this engine did not have a dipstick. This was in a jeep but that be very disappointing.

  • @race8427
    @race8427 Месяц назад +1

    This tiny 6 has the Hemis reputation (performance, reliability, service life) to at least equal, no small feat for sure. I’m thinking of some other newer engines including diesels that have less than stellar reputations/service life. The Hemi succeeded while the Pentistar has failed to earn Chrysler a halo status powerplant. A corporations reputation is resting on this lil 6, will it have the Hemi performance diesel ruggedness and longevity to succeed?

  • @The_Valiant_Thor
    @The_Valiant_Thor Месяц назад +130

    I'm so sick of anything with less than 8 cylinders. 👎👎👎👎

    • @sbenn6917
      @sbenn6917 Месяц назад +16

      Dude , I hear ya but I bought a 3.5 ecoboost and got it tuned. There is no v8 out there, in a pick up, that can keep up

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +21

      @@sbenn6917what do you mean keep up? Go fast? I thought trucks were supposed to be trucks not race cars

    • @jza80king
      @jza80king Месяц назад +14

      All this bitching about less cylinders. Do you want carburetors back too? Technology is the replacement for displacement, you damn boomers.

    • @gregday9943
      @gregday9943 Месяц назад

      These new turbo engines run good but id say you tune the 6.7 powerstroke and or the 6.6 duramax will probably out run you. ​@@sbenn6917

    • @user-ju1qx9dc3w
      @user-ju1qx9dc3w Месяц назад +10

      @@jza80king not always and not in this case. It has more to do with the EPA than anything else.

  • @ottovonbismarck7094
    @ottovonbismarck7094 Месяц назад

    I wish they did both like ford, and hey they may end up doing so by popular demand, variety is the flavor of life after all

  • @spxram4793
    @spxram4793 Месяц назад +1

    With an inline 6, RAM chose to take over a typical BMW engine configuration. I am convinced they could have done better with another typical BMW approach:
    SInce more than 10 years, BMW purchases the ZF HP 8speed transmission with a built- in mild hybrid configuration (integrated into the transmission case) . Similar to the Toyota mild hybrids, the (rather small) battery charges when braking, and boosts during acceleration. This results in 10-15% better mileage with the same engine, so they could've kept the V8. The configuration also enables a simple auto start/stop and replaces the separate starter and generator electric devices, and eliminates the need for the large drivebelt for the separate starter and generator. RAM should have been doing this actually since the start of the Gen5! The RAM "solution" for the mild hybrid is a pile of rubbish, adding ANOTHER drivebelt and ANOTHER electric device.

  • @darksmith7318
    @darksmith7318 Месяц назад +1

    it is sad to see ram is getting rid of 5.7. My 17 ram 5.7 is almost at 80 thousand miles and works perfectly fine. I guess next time I get new truck with hemi in it, I will have to start with 2500 and get a 6.4 instead

  • @juliocvelez1
    @juliocvelez1 Месяц назад +3

    I just can’t do 6 cylinders in a pickup. I tow often through the mountains on steep narrow roads. The 6 cylinders scream the entire time. The 8’s just cruise and actually accelerate with little effort especially with a load.

    • @jpete3027666
      @jpete3027666 Месяц назад +3

      Yep and they market the 0-60 times for these small engine/turbocharged trucks. Who gives a shit about 0-60 in a truck? At this rate I’ll probably keep my 2005 6.0 Silverado until I’m dead.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP Месяц назад +2

      What experience do you have with a modern turbocharged half ton engine?

    • @juliocvelez1
      @juliocvelez1 Месяц назад

      @@ALMX5DP I import vehicles, campers, and boats into Puerto Rico. I’ve rented trucks since 2021 because my old f-250 was finally completely clapped out. I’ve driven all the modern pickups available really. Vans too. I wasn’t giving in to the wild prices post covid which is why I rented for a while. I finally settled this year with a 24 ram rebel mainly because it was the best offering available to me that met my needs. The dealer took 13k off then I got the rebates as well which was another 15k so waiting worked out for me. I like the modern comfortable interior and exterior styling. Off-road capabilities, and the proven engine platform.

    • @juliocvelez1
      @juliocvelez1 Месяц назад +1

      @@jpete3027666 it’ll likely outlive us both! Great truck. 👍🏼

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP Месяц назад +5

      @@juliocvelez1 just curious what you meant by screaming V6's. Have you driven both a 3.5 Ecoboost and 5.0 F-150 with the same loads and observed what RPM you were running at for a given pull / scenario?

  • @stevetipene3319
    @stevetipene3319 4 дня назад

    from my experience towing with a turbo 6 it wont be screaming at 4500rpm because its peak torque comes in at 2500rpm

  • @erikmireles5879
    @erikmireles5879 Месяц назад +3

    Either way you slice it Mopar is getting cooked in truck performance by other makes. Haven't updated the 6.4 bge and now it's the smallest/weakest motor, bye 5.7 and the 3.6 in gladiators has the power same numbers since debut 2013. If all these engines were straight up bullet proof that would be one thing but fca/stellantis or whatever has neutered Mopar.

  • @GarageWorx
    @GarageWorx Месяц назад +1

    Only time will tell if the Hurricane will be good. I say bring back the 4.0 inline 6.