Because you associate his clothing and hairstyle with older generation. Same reason pictures of school students from previous generations look older compared to todays children of same age.
"Its all pretty clear to me, I mean 1.d4 its impossible to find. Even in classical I am maybe not find 1.d4." "Let's see if it is best move in position, okey, it's second strongest move, as I thought, lets start zee procedure...."
Kramnik read books of Wilhelm Steinitz and concludes: "Everything is clear to me, I mean you can read everything here. I will report this Steinitz, whomever that may be."
It is a bit sad seeing the computer judging their moves. In 1994 no one knew the best moves and these guys were unjudgable geniuses peering into the unknown limitless combinations
How strange, humans playing human chess, independent of machines, just thinking by themselves ... Distant, distant times, so strange ... 21st Century machine zombies are amazed.
They should not use engine while doing commentators now..just analyse the move after the game..Danya or Gotham chess would be good commentator nowadays..
a couple of months before this game, Kramnik had beaten Kasparov in classic at the Linares tournament ... he was always an uncomfortable opponent to kasparov
Holy hell, I dig this kind of commentary. Their processing of variations is just enough for me not to get lost as compared to today's avalanche of notation and remarks.
these ppl are gods, got nothing to proove and would surely never go so down with their behaving by accusing every opponent they lose to of cheating just because they are alrdy older and not so influent in the chess world, right? RIGHT?!
@@sterko78 Now move to move calculation not 1990s style plans learned from books .Calculation abilities is clearly better now and engines improved players defensive abilities by alot, engines shown lots of bad position can be defended and how to do it .Kids from age 7 is solving puzzles every day now and its clearly can be seen in their game when they become GM. Openings,calculation,stubborn defence is way better now than in 1990s.
@@sportvideofootage It isn't that much better than the 1990s. You shouldn't underestimate the players from the 1990s and noughties and stuff. What you're saying is actually more of an advantage in Classical chess, not rapid chess. Look at Kasparov in recent times for example...he was having an easy time against two top rapid players recently...Hikaru Nakamura and Fabiano Caruana...and this is an old Garry. Garry has just always been good at rapid chess. Kramnik has never been as good at rapid chess. Vishy Anand was known as the lightning kid, because of his phenomenal speed. In blitz chess, there may have been some improvements in rapid chess calculation, but it's minimal because rapid chess is quick on the fly with decision making. It's not like classical chess where engine preparation can help a lot because you're given more time to calculate. Even Bobby Fischer would have been a devastating threat in modern day rapid chess...and he invented Fischer random, so clearly Bobby has creativity skills and he can play quickly. Even Paul Morphy was a very quick player, according to Bobby Fischer. Bobby says that Paul had complete sight of the board and could quickly move pieces in optimal positions without needing time to think. Yes, blitz chess level has perhaps improved, but not by as much as you think it has. It's classical chess that has improved a lot, not blitz chess really. Kids solving puzzles by age 7 means nothing, kids were solving puzzles in books back then.
@@HonkyMonky Which Kramnik is actually making worse by being so reckless with his accusations. If he was more thoughtful and discerning in who/how he accused people it would be taken more seriously. Instead he constantly accuses people who clearly aren't cheating and everyone takes the cheating problem less seriously.
@@ZV5470you peeps are so dumb like sheep. You think because someone has an unpopular opinion they're right rather than looking at the situation critically and accepting that it's unpopular because it's wrong
People might underestimate Kramnik. But, unlike Magnus, Kramnik got to fight Kasparov at his peak. This is worth recognition despite his old age weir behavior.
Kramnik was definitely one of the best chess players ever, there's no doubt about it. Kind of sucks he ruins is legacy like this tbh. But it's the kind of 'dont meet your idols' situation. I rather the version of Kramnik in my head that doesn't exist anymore be the reality of who I think he is than who he is for real and I chose to stay in delusion.
At the time, I was fourteen years old and I admit that every time these two great GMs met in the Intel Grand Prix, I was electrified. I'm sure that watching these games with the commentaries of Danny King and Nigel Short, young chess players today feel the strong tension and drama of these encounters. Kramnik's strength of play and his words have been much criticized but it must be admitted, in view of these images, that it's difficult to believe his detractors and that in 2006, Topalov's camp really put water on the fire while in the other direction, nothing is less certain about the Bulgarian champion... In any case, it's a great pleasure and nostalgia that we can (re-)watch these "collector" footage ! 👍
Actually, Kramnik is gay and he had a boyfriend who had a 9 inch dong. Also, Kramnik had two pet pug dogs who were fed drugs, 6556 drugs to be precise. Kramnik's gay husband's name was Pavel. As soon as Kramnik came home from a hard day at work playing chess, Pavel would prance to the door in his booty shorts and they would both give each other a wet, slobbering kiss on the lips...saliva drooling. Then Pavel would lovingly stroke and pat Kramnik's hair. Also, Kramnik was really into 9 inch nails...his husband, Pavel, would set 9 inch nails on the floor and Kramnik would insert the 9 inch nails up his bum to excite himself. Unfortunately, he had to have an endoscopy later because something went wrong. I hope my words put a funny image in your mind, Merry Christmas.
He's still brilliant when it comes to playing chess, but has always been delusional. Magnus put it the best way - "Kramnik thinks he knows everything. It’s very impressive how Kramnik reels out variations and so on, and it’s not so easy to discern if you don’t understand the game well yourself, but if you look a little deeper it’s often nonsense. He always plays very principled chess, but the biggest difference between him and me is that he makes a lot more mistakes. Often he seems to think he’s in the right, but I’m actually right. He’s very confident. He’s not afraid of anyone. He doesn’t think I’m better than him. He doesn’t think Aronian’s better than him and he doesn’t think Anand is better than him. He actually loses games to Nakamura, but he certainly doesn’t believe Nakamura is better than him."
@@Padfoot-l1d Kramnik was never brilliant, he was just lucky to be on his top when the opposition was weak and not properly prepared. That's why his time on the top was short.
@@andrerocka8135 All players have weaker periods and Kramnik became WC in a period when the competition was weaker. Both Anand and Kasparov have a strength that is enough to challenge anyone, even today, Kramnik has not.
Bcs now they just look at the engines and say and you will get that WCM commentator saying « oh what a blunder Qc6 was best and now Magnus loses 0,2 pts on the evaluation omg »
Nice video, thank you! Kramnik had a draw opportunity two times due to some Kasparov's mistakes. Although Garry was a beast then, beated literally everyone.
@kajkviggs You can not compare two generations in their prime. It is pointless. Today, chess players try to memorize computer analyse, back then chess players have bee using their own brain.
@@gorangoran6335 No, I was round back then. People in the 1990s complained about players relying too much on memorizing opening lines and using computers to analyze too. I also have a book from the late 1960s saying that chess has shown 'surprising resistance to become over analyzed to death' People have seemingly been always complaining about the 'modern' tendency for chess to be too analyzed . It's just another example of people whining about the current situation and looking back at earlier times with misguided fondness.
@@VotdTrades I made that post as an exaggeration done for effect, but the fact is that a strong computer program back then was fairly weak by today's standards and cost a lot. In 1999 the strongest commercially available program was about 2300 Elo or so, and cost hundreds of dollars.
Magnus is better in Midgame and Endgame, that’s his strength. Early game and theoretical moves is nearly his only weakness. So, we can say that he is not remembering every theory position, while in 99% of games his view on the board will give him an opportunity to initiate theory moves right. Even if he doesn’t know the position
![Most DRAMATIC pairing [Daniel naroditsky 🆚 Vladimir kramnik ] +dual commantatory #chess#titletuesday](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FR6dq_rTCX4/mqdefault.jpg)
Fun history fact: Shortly after attempting to flag Kasparov in a completely lost position in this game, kramnik blocked and reported him.
Kasparov's accuracy was ninety a lot percent.
Kramnik at 19 looks like Kramnik now in a wig
nice NOT to hear "oh this was a mistake" or "can he find the best move" because commentators know everything
ehhh, those guys' commentary was awful tho
Nahhh, it's better to know what the heck is going on
This is the moment Vladimir Kramnik decided to do the procedure
19-year-old Kramnik looks about 41.
at least he doesn’t have gray hair
No, he doesn't LOL
Intresting
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Because you associate his clothing and hairstyle with older generation. Same reason pictures of school students from previous generations look older compared to todays children of same age.
i think everything is clear here, ok let’s do the procedure
I think this was shortly after he left Led Zeppelin
These were the times when he didnt know about the procedure 😂
Everything is clear about this game to me. Lets start the procedure!
@@dennishaller6578 You copied my comment dude
@@RexplayzzOfficial people write that on every video
@@RexplayzzOfficial Bro really thinks he's the first one to write that on a Kramnik video 😂
@@RexplayzzOfficialdo you really think you’re the only one who comments that on Kramnik videos?😂
Impressive. Very nice. Now let's do the procedure.
Now lets do the procedure..
It's very clear to me let's do the procedure
Imagine if he just got up and said “It is clear to me now, let’s do the procedure”, as he pulled out a gun…
😂😂
"Its all pretty clear to me, I mean 1.d4 its impossible to find. Even in classical I am maybe not find 1.d4."
"Let's see if it is best move in position, okey, it's second strongest move, as I thought, lets start zee procedure...."
"No doubt in my mind about this player. Absolutely no doubt."
"okay now we do the procedure"
lmfao
So sad such a great chess player ruined his whole reputation
🤣
Lol
Kramnik: Its obvious, standard procedure…
Kramniks hair is crazy
It checks out with recent events I guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Kramnik now is crazy 😂
Hans Niemann has copied it
It was the 90s, everybody had crazy hair
@@freebee8221 The 1990s were better times.
Kramnik read books of Wilhelm Steinitz and concludes: "Everything is clear to me, I mean you can read everything here. I will report this Steinitz, whomever that may be."
🤣
LMAO
"commentator: Kasparov has very little time with 1 minute"
Players playing bullet chess now smiling.
"So much time, sooooooo much time."
No doubt absolutely no doubt about this Kasparov player
Kramnik has looked 45 for the last 30yrs
"I block I report"
Alright I think it's very clear. Let's do the procedure.
Everything is perfectly clear, we do the procedure.
It is a bit sad seeing the computer judging their moves. In 1994 no one knew the best moves and these guys were unjudgable geniuses peering into the unknown limitless combinations
There are no best moves. Slightly stronger engines hate moves of other engines and so on.
@@D3athstroke checkmate is always the best move
@@D3athstrokewe have a table base of up to 7 pieces and they're working on 8. There is a limit, sometimes we know the best moves.
@@D3athstroke "People think there are all these options, but there's usually one right move."
@@Demian_R I don't know if Fischer actually said that, but Tobey Maguire sure did 😉
If only he had his procedure he could show em all wrong
So interesting to see how commentary worked without engines…
How strange, humans playing human chess, independent of machines, just thinking by themselves ... Distant, distant times, so strange ...
21st Century machine zombies are amazed.
They should not use engine while doing commentators now..just analyse the move after the game..Danya or Gotham chess would be good commentator nowadays..
Kramnik goes backstage and immediately does “ze praceedzha” 😂😂😂
a couple of months before this game, Kramnik had beaten Kasparov in classic at the Linares tournament ... he was always an uncomfortable opponent to kasparov
One of the very few players with a + score vs Kasparov 5-4 in classical if I remember right.
The old school graphics are nice to watch.
Suspicious middlegame from Garry, I do the procedure...
Holy hell, I dig this kind of commentary. Their processing of variations is just enough for me not to get lost as compared to today's avalanche of notation and remarks.
Interesting hair... time for the standard procedure
Clearly, Kasparov cheated.
teenage kramnik is just the old kramnik with a wig.
I think it's great how commentary has evolved to include engine moves and more insight into the position
Kramnik looked like a old man with young hair
LOL
look how fast kramnik made all of the opening moves. He has been indeed a theory revolutionary
Vlad ‘the procedure ‘ Kramnik
Hmm, Kasparov plays interesting, over, 90% accuracy, now we do the procedure
Nahkay. Everything is clear about this game, to me. Completely clear. I report, ... okay I block and report.
Lmaooooooo
90s commentator makes it look like this is bullet chess.
He's now look younger 😂
Kramnik: okey, let's do the procedures
Kasparov was a monster on the chessboard; in the best sense of the term. In his prime he had no equal.
Beginning of “The Process.”
Procedure**
@@NotAGamer-69-f2p it started out as “The Process,” then became, after years of research; “The Procedure.”
@@jsj297 😂😂
This chess youngster has such a talent. I wonder if he becomes a world champion, I hope he isn't trash talking to anyone right now
these ppl are gods, got nothing to proove and would surely never go so down with their behaving by accusing every opponent they lose to of cheating just because they are alrdy older and not so influent in the chess world, right? RIGHT?!
Kramnik then proceeded to complain about the input lag
Kramnik has over 1 minute and plays instant.. that was the point where he blundered a lot
The blinking Queen...ah, the 90's. Ahaha, and "Kasparov only 30 seconds left, can he Checkmate...?" Such a different sort of game. 9:15
Kasparov: interesting
Where are you looking kasparov ?
XD 🤣🤣
😅
Alpha zero
everything is clear to me now
It's funny that Kramnik almost quit online chess because Keymer flagged him, while he is trying to do the same here with Kasparov😂
Kramnik had some serious hair back in the day.
Still does
Let's check Kaparov's moves - best, best, best, ok second best.
Ok everything is clear to me, I mean you saw everything.
If you are not too naive.
This is very high level blitz especially for 1994 before engines
Blitz hasn't gotten that much stronger since. It is opening + quick calculations. What do engines change much here?
@@sterko78 Now move to move calculation not 1990s style plans learned from books .Calculation abilities is clearly better now and engines improved players defensive abilities by alot, engines shown lots of bad position can be defended and how to do it .Kids from age 7 is solving puzzles every day now and its clearly can be seen in their game when they become GM. Openings,calculation,stubborn defence is way better now than in 1990s.
Back then it was human chess, what do you have today? The purely human level was much higher back then.
@@germanchris4440 are you even good? What's your fife ID? You talk such nonsense
@@sportvideofootage It isn't that much better than the 1990s. You shouldn't underestimate the players from the 1990s and noughties and stuff. What you're saying is actually more of an advantage in Classical chess, not rapid chess. Look at Kasparov in recent times for example...he was having an easy time against two top rapid players recently...Hikaru Nakamura and Fabiano Caruana...and this is an old Garry. Garry has just always been good at rapid chess. Kramnik has never been as good at rapid chess. Vishy Anand was known as the lightning kid, because of his phenomenal speed. In blitz chess, there may have been some improvements in rapid chess calculation, but it's minimal because rapid chess is quick on the fly with decision making. It's not like classical chess where engine preparation can help a lot because you're given more time to calculate. Even Bobby Fischer would have been a devastating threat in modern day rapid chess...and he invented Fischer random, so clearly Bobby has creativity skills and he can play quickly. Even Paul Morphy was a very quick player, according to Bobby Fischer. Bobby says that Paul had complete sight of the board and could quickly move pieces in optimal positions without needing time to think. Yes, blitz chess level has perhaps improved, but not by as much as you think it has. It's classical chess that has improved a lot, not blitz chess really. Kids solving puzzles by age 7 means nothing, kids were solving puzzles in books back then.
That chess is way more exciting than today's. Props to both players, Full respect.
Shakes my head as Kramik reports Kasparov for cheating and blocks him. 😆
"so, i'm going to do the usual procedure." 😂
Lmao!
Kramnik looked like a discord anime weeb
I block, and I report.
Batman: The Beginning of the Procedure.
Lol
Garry Kasparov is Joker, and Vladimir Kramnik is Batman 😁 🦇
kramnik is playing like he has 5 seconds on his clock even tho he literally has a minute and a half time advantage.. lol
There is no increment.
I knew Garry was strong but damn I had not imagined he would be this strong
He was. He indeed was. Pca world champion from 1985-2000. Kramnik himself dethroned him.
arguably the goat xd indeed really strong
Kramnik was a great player. It's so sad to see what he did to himself and his reputation by making this online chess cheating controversy.
And I am proud of Kramnik. He alone goes against the system, a real champion and not a clown blogger, like some
I mean obviously, there is a big cheating problem online...
@@HonkyMonky Which Kramnik is actually making worse by being so reckless with his accusations. If he was more thoughtful and discerning in who/how he accused people it would be taken more seriously. Instead he constantly accuses people who clearly aren't cheating and everyone takes the cheating problem less seriously.
@@Will-fz4jt I agree
@@ZV5470you peeps are so dumb like sheep. You think because someone has an unpopular opinion they're right rather than looking at the situation critically and accepting that it's unpopular because it's wrong
People might underestimate Kramnik. But, unlike Magnus, Kramnik got to fight Kasparov at his peak. This is worth recognition despite his old age weir behavior.
He's not even 50
Kramnik was definitely one of the best chess players ever, there's no doubt about it. Kind of sucks he ruins is legacy like this tbh. But it's the kind of 'dont meet your idols' situation.
I rather the version of Kramnik in my head that doesn't exist anymore be the reality of who I think he is than who he is for real and I chose to stay in delusion.
Plot twist: Kramnik used stockfish
19 year old kramnik looks similar to 22 year old hans niemann. Both look way older than their age.
Niemann is 21
Time traveller??
Truly an amazing champion Kasparov. The greatest in history as the last top human before engine dominance.
its good , kramnik not reporting as cheating to kasparov.. now if he cannot win, he will reporting cheating to his opponent
I mean where is he looking ? It’s obvious that Kasparov is zere while he is looking za ozer way .. Im just stating facts ..
He tried to flag him. Lmfao
Lol the signs were there all along that he would go nuts eventually
Kramnik looks like he could play Keith in a Russian version of The Office
Under ‘strengths’ you’ve just put ‘chess’, and under ‘weaknesses’ you put ‘paranoia’
Young Kramnik looks like a character from Little Britian.
Little did we know how far Kramnik would fall from grace
The old watch looks cooler I think
Yeah
At the time, I was fourteen years old and I admit that every time these two great GMs met in the Intel Grand Prix, I was electrified. I'm sure that watching these games with the commentaries of Danny King and Nigel Short, young chess players today feel the strong tension and drama of these encounters. Kramnik's strength of play and his words have been much criticized but it must be admitted, in view of these images, that it's difficult to believe his detractors and that in 2006, Topalov's camp really put water on the fire while in the other direction, nothing is less certain about the Bulgarian champion... In any case, it's a great pleasure and nostalgia that we can (re-)watch these "collector" footage ! 👍
Cleanest best pleasure
The thumbnail looks like a Tim & Eric sketch
That just shows you how after the time tim and Eric are. They captured a while generations style a decade later.
at this time a legend was 4 years old
No, I was 20 already mate
@@ROBERTORRRR1 🤣😂
I was a year old lol
Back then when it came to Chess Kasparov was a very Scary name.
Even to this very day.
Still is
Kramnik was 100% into Nine Inch Nails back in the day
Actually, Kramnik is gay and he had a boyfriend who had a 9 inch dong. Also, Kramnik had two pet pug dogs who were fed drugs, 6556 drugs to be precise. Kramnik's gay husband's name was Pavel. As soon as Kramnik came home from a hard day at work playing chess, Pavel would prance to the door in his booty shorts and they would both give each other a wet, slobbering kiss on the lips...saliva drooling. Then Pavel would lovingly stroke and pat Kramnik's hair. Also, Kramnik was really into 9 inch nails...his husband, Pavel, would set 9 inch nails on the floor and Kramnik would insert the 9 inch nails up his bum to excite himself. Unfortunately, he had to have an endoscopy later because something went wrong. I hope my words put a funny image in your mind, Merry Christmas.
In all seriousness though, Kramnik and Kasparov both played a very good game here. Well played Kramnik and Kasparov.
@@ArranVid nah bro you just can't say "i all seriousness" after the diabolical shit you dropped above this ☠️
@@Avinashkumar-rg7cu Lmao 😂. I just did it bro 😈. Also, your dog in your profile picture is a good dog 😊 👍 🐕.
@@ArranVid he lives in my street. Sometimes he scratches my door asking for rusk. His appearance is quite deceiving,very mischievous dog 🐶🐶🐶
why is he glancing to the left every 4.5 seconds? suspicious
Hahaha
Lets do the procedure
I'm impartial but Kasparov is moving his pieces before Kramnik has moved his.
Being the World Champion has its perks!! 💁🏻♂️
Called a pre-move lol
I think it's allowed, because he moves after Kramnik leaves the piece and before he touches the clock. Nothing wrong in my opinion.
Old vlad sure is taking a lot of bathroom breaks. Sus
Thank you for sharing this video . Very entertaining!
Was it just me who noticed that Kramink went to the bathroom and checked Stockfish on an iPad? Sus.
From being this brilliant, how did he ended up being a egoistic crackpot
don't talk about Kramnik like that
He's still brilliant when it comes to playing chess, but has always been delusional. Magnus put it the best way -
"Kramnik thinks he knows everything.
It’s very impressive how Kramnik reels out variations and so on, and it’s not so easy to discern if you don’t understand the game well yourself, but if you look a little deeper it’s often nonsense. He always plays very principled chess, but the biggest difference between him and me is that he makes a lot more mistakes. Often he seems to think he’s in the right, but I’m actually right.
He’s very confident. He’s not afraid of anyone. He doesn’t think I’m better than him. He doesn’t think Aronian’s better than him and he doesn’t think Anand is better than him. He actually loses games to Nakamura, but he certainly doesn’t believe Nakamura is better than him."
@@Padfoot-l1d Kramnik was never brilliant, he was just lucky to be on his top when the opposition was weak and not properly prepared. That's why his time on the top was short.
@@Johan654-s1f Sure, wc kasparov and prime anand, topalov, kamsky were very weak
@@andrerocka8135 All players have weaker periods and Kramnik became WC in a period when the competition was weaker. Both Anand and Kasparov have a strength that is enough to challenge anyone, even today, Kramnik has not.
Pre Engine commentators sound so clueless as compared to todays commentators
queen up must be a win !! :)
Isn't it wonderful? Those were the days.
Now days, you have these WIM commentators bashing Magnus for making the second best move.
The best era of chess commentators.
Bcs now they just look at the engines and say and you will get that WCM commentator saying « oh what a blunder Qc6 was best and now Magnus loses 0,2 pts on the evaluation omg »
Oof Kasparov blundered in the endgame, losing a pawn. And he shook his head.
Nice video, thank you! Kramnik had a draw opportunity two times due to some Kasparov's mistakes. Although Garry was a beast then, beated literally everyone.
Interesting
1994, when a computer program with a 2100 Elo rating would cost you $500
true, but its also the reason why current generation is so much stronger.
$500 in 1994 is $1,064.42 in 2024
@kajkviggs You can not compare two generations in their prime. It is pointless. Today, chess players try to memorize computer analyse, back then chess players have bee using their own brain.
@@gorangoran6335 No, I was round back then. People in the 1990s complained about players relying too much on memorizing opening lines and using computers to analyze too. I also have a book from the late 1960s saying that chess has shown 'surprising resistance to become over analyzed to death' People have seemingly been always complaining about the 'modern' tendency for chess to be too analyzed . It's just another example of people whining about the current situation and looking back at earlier times with misguided fondness.
@@VotdTrades I made that post as an exaggeration done for effect, but the fact is that a strong computer program back then was fairly weak by today's standards and cost a lot. In 1999 the strongest commercially available program was about 2300 Elo or so, and cost hundreds of dollars.
Kasparov did procedure on him after the match.
😂😂😂😂
lol
Nd3 sacrificing a Knight for the wrong bishop color draw was not that hard to see, but surprised both missed it
*bit
Do you even adrenaline? lol
Everything is easier to see as a spectator. You are not in the rush of the game
@@rvo757you tell him baby! 😅
kasparov with all his mannerisms
was clearly cheating according to kramnik, kasparov invented the time machine to have access to modern chess engines
19 year old kramnik is basically L from death note ahhahahahahahahahajah
Words Magnus Carlsen will never utter: 0:34
Magnus is better in Midgame and Endgame, that’s his strength. Early game and theoretical moves is nearly his only weakness. So, we can say that he is not remembering every theory position, while in 99% of games his view on the board will give him an opportunity to initiate theory moves right. Even if he doesn’t know the position
@@АлексейМенялин-х7м Interesting hypothesis 🤔
"Such a move.."
Kramnik tries to flag Garry?
Moral degregation…
How dare he has a different opinion 30 years later...
lol
I wish they did chess visuals like this again. Id rather see the real board and analysis bottom right, makes it mor3 intense when they move
I like how they make mistakes, makes me feel better about my game reviews..
NIGEL SHORT IS COMMENTATING, HOORAY!!!