When Pulakeshin II defeated Harshavardhan
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- The battle between Pulakeshin II and Harshavardhana is known to most of us. But little attention has been paid to understand the circumstances that were responsible for this battle. In this video, we will look at this whole episode in detail.
Reference : -
1. The World of Skandapurana by Hans T Bakker.
2. Harsha A Political Study by D. Devahuti
3. History of Kannuaj R. S. Tripathi
4. Political History of the Chalukyas of Badami by Durga Prasad Dikshit
5. THE BIJAPUR-MUMBAI COPPERPLATE GRANT
OF C LUKYA RULER PULAKEŚIN II,
DATED APRIL 04, 619 CE, MENTIONING HIS TRIUMPH
OVER EMPEROR HARṢAVARDHANA1 By
Shreenand L. Bapat and Pradeep S. Sohoni
Credits:-
Inputs on the script by Pushkar Chaudhary.
Spotify
open.spotify.c...
Follow me on Twitter
/ jayvtweets
Follow me on Goodreads
/ jay-vardhan
Maps Images used in the video are made by me and are subject to copyright.
Images are sourced from :-
commons.wikime...
That's why I kept requesting you since last one year to make a separate video on Maitraka dynasty...it is very important, they ruled post Western Kshatrapas till Arabic invasions and later succeeded by Gurjar Pratihar.
Their political role under Gupta administration and later independent rulers and during Arab invasions is extremely important. Other than then Saindhavs played pivotal role.
There are many surviving monuments today from the time of Maitraka in present time Gujarat region.
And if possible make a video of pre Arabic Sindh dynasties. Don't forget present day North West region of Pakistan also
Very good 👍.. elaborate
You forgotten to tell others most important things as follows
1) he had navy (100 big ships) in 6th century, he had navy merchants who have done business Sassania dynasty (Persians), Iraq and Arab Countries.
2) He keep invaded Arab countries Sassanian Dynasty (Iran and Iraq or Persia) for troubling his merchant for not do their business. Thereafter Sassanian Dynasty surrendered and sent their embassy to chalukya Dynasty and he gave lot of elephants, golds, weapons, dresses to Sassanian king Khusrow 2 and his family members too. ( We can see the Persian embassy with king Immadi Pulakeshi' painiting in Ajantha caves.
3). Most important he defeated the first Islamic invade by Caliphs in 624 AD at Thane and Gujarat.
4) he tributes and taxes from his Peripheral states Simhala (Srilanka), Khevar (Combodia), Sassanian (Persia), present Oman and Behrain.
5) he fought ind his life with Caliphs in their land to help the Sassanian Dynasty (Persia).
6) he was hounered with names of Parameshwara, Dakshina Patheshwara, Prtivi Vallabha, Veerakesari, Sathyapriya and many more.
7) he never tried to establish hia dynasty, just he want to protect his dynasty, if he want easily he can won the Persia and Caliphs too. When he stoped to help Sassanian dynaaty therafter only the persia became Islamic country.
8) during his period he shltered lots of Persians who were persecuted by Islamic invades.
These history never said in any books. But this all stories has been inscripted in lot of inscriptions which were ind Pali, Sanskrit and Kannada languages.
And about Aihole inscription was mentioned that the after 3300 years of (maharabarath Yuddh) Kurukshetra war Pulakeshi 2 was started to rule the chalukya dynasty.
The Arabs were pirates
Excellent information. Please write in detail. Thanks
The first Arab Invasion was not stopped by Immadi Pulikeshi because his reign was from 610 to 642 and Arab invasion of Sindh was at 711 AD , it was his grandson, Avani Jayashraya Pulakeshi , who are a Branch family of Badami Chalukyas who were also called as chalukyas of Navasari, along with Rashtrakuta feudatory Dantidurga defeated Arabs , all of this major kings from North to South formed an alliance or Confederacy and defeated Arabs .
Kannadiga Power Immadi Pulikeshi. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Narshihmn 1
@@Devid1971Vikramaditya 2
Hindu power Immadi Pulikeshi 😍
@@patienttest ethnicity matters more than religion...
We kannadigas DON'T SHARE ANY similarities with North indians, except religions...
Just because we follow the same religion doesn't make us the same people
@@martinluther4720 religion matters more than ethinicity, its our religion which unitesd us. your ethinicity only divides . ppl like u divide us in the name of your language chauviinism
The greatest civil war in Indian history (better than Kalinga)
Two legendary kings, one epic battle
Definitely should be made into a movie for future generations
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I don't want bollywood to ruin anymore iconic historical moments.
Satvahan vs shaka battles were more legendry than this, but this also good + triangle of kannuaj battles was also good
@@witchilich Then ask Tollydawood.
@@sauron2000000 After seeing that "Gautamiputra Satakarni" movie, nope.
He Was First Man Call Word Tri - Maharashtra- Desha..
Source Aihole Inscription
Was it Tri-Maharashtra-Desha or Tri-Rashtrakutaka
The thumbnail was just lit bhai 🔥 🔥
I think Xuanzang was also welcomed in Pulakeshin II court and he has some documentation on Chalukyas as well
It is fact, nothing to think of opinion on them
Xuanzang is lier 😂
@@keshavkk479harshwardan defeated by pulkeshan
@@datacollector345 so?
@@50centgamer65 you are big Truther right 😂
Vro plz makd videos on south indian dynasties as well.... Chalukya vs. Pallava, Pallava vs Pandya, then Greater Cholas ❤❤😢😢
Cholas wasn't great back then, they came to prominence in 9th century
Bhai can you discuss about the type of armor used by Indians pre Islamic invasion.
Very informative!! Keep teaching us very valuable information! 🙏🏻
Instead of fighting each other had these Kings help protect the borders of the whole region esp Sindh and Kutch,there would have been no Pakistan today
This king pulikeshi actually defeated the caliph at thane please don't come to conclusion without proper knowledge about the history
Exactly. Eventually, both pulikeshi & harsha lost their kingdoms. Thanks to pulikeshi's son vikramaditya, he restored chalukya kingdom, but in north, small kingdoms came up which couldn't withstand Islamic invasions
These two great men would have thought that no Islamic rulers could defeat them, thats true for them but not for later kings...😢
You are talking as if India was always a well-defined nation-state and these were part of it like today's states. These were sovereign kingdoms. Much like rulers of other lands, they too wanted to expand their kingdom's power. As long as we keep thinking of India as one unit before the British defined it so, we will keep reading history wrong.
So can you tell me why Greece got United even with so much difference fought against common enemy persia.......how did spain reclaim their land
Good work man. Keep it up
Please make a video on Kushan Empire especially their Arms and Armor
A truly informative video❤...Can you please make a detailed video on Feudalism and its impact on indian society ... always get confused bcz of various debates and interpretations
My man doesn't care about looks or hair, passion first.
Yeah i thought i was the only one zoned in onto what's stuck in his hair 😀 You're right, his passion is evident
Thanks for showing a nice and true History. Actually, the Chinese traveller cum monk, Sir Hiuen T. was a devout Buddhist. After his defeat at the hands of Pulakeshin, the great King Harsha of Kannauj / Kaanya kubj / W UP; took the path of peace. He thought war was unnecessary and completely converted to staunch Buddhism, a Hindu sect only, Sir. He also invited that famous Buddhist scholar cum monk, Hiuen Tsang to his court. Both being Buddhists, Hiuen Tsang couldnot gulp down the defeat of his friend and Buddhist disciple, by King Pulak. And that's why perhaps, he did not directly write about this defeat of King Harsha , in his Diary. Good nt. Sir and all.
What's your opinion on, one of maukhari emperor inscription found at asigarh , did they already had land south of narmada
Nice one and interesting chapter of the history.
Superb video
It was a Great Kannada Empire...
Your way of explaining is very good and way ahead of many others. Thank you for the video.
well presented.
A dedicated video please on everything historical about deep south (Southern Tamilian kingdoms, their cultures, religion, language which were I think remained by and large untouched from the political happenings and turmoil in the north across millennia). If that is not a part of your research, please give at least your understanding as a history Phd. fellow. Thanks.
Will soon cover the History of Southern India as well. I've made a video on it, if you haven't watched it do watch it. Many more will come soon.
ruclips.net/video/WVIz_0PYMJQ/видео.html&ab_channel=JayVardhanSingh
Maitrakas were under Harsha Harshas daughter was married to dhruvsen second some maitrakas ruler ,maitrakas ruler also attended Buddhist council hosted by harsha as you have pointed out rightly
Meaning of Pulikeshi in kannada Puli (tiger) and Keshi (Hair)
Later due to influence of Jainism in Karnataka, the word Puli became Huli because they pronounce 'h' instead of 'p'
Otherwise, in other South Indian languages Tiger is called as Puli but kannada it is called as Huli
🐈🐈🐈🐈
Puli means Teacher or Tiger ?
Because first you mentioned Teacher ?
puli (now called huli in modern kannada) is tiger not teacher
Malayalam too
Remember the name karnata bala💪💪
This fake historian has not read anything about the invincible army called as Great Kannada army aka “Karnata Bala Ajeyam”
@deep264 invincible army got defeated by pallava what a shame
@@midfielderlounge2592again pallavas difeated by real south indian empire army Karnatabala. Pallavas came from north india to Tamilnadu.
@@deep264 where was your kings and army when arabs invaded Bharat. It was only the brave Rajputs who.were defending the borders for 400 years straight. All these bravado is of no use when the real enemy is at the gate. Only Rajputana stood tall and held the borders for 1200 years straight. South indians could not even fight a small muslim king like tipu sultan. What a shame.
@andy15z22 Give this man an award he forgot the timelines of history, Pulakeshijn was in 6th century and Tipu sultan was in 18 century which is gap of 1200 years, even in 18 century Kodavas,Gowda and Mysore Wodeyars supported British to finish of Tipu in Anglo Mysore war, Education & true knowledge of history is important not brainwashing..For atleast 1200 years Kannada kingdoms, Chalukya, Rashtrakutas, Vijaynagar, Ikkeri, Nayakas kept Mughals out from Narmada to south of India
Good description
I like your vdos particularly because you explain quite clearly. Please make more such vdos.
Dakshina patheshwara, kannada kula thilaka, chalukya pulakeshi
Aihole/ಐಹೊಳೆ is pronounced as "I-ho-lay" and not "I-hole"
Bro adu ಅಯ್ಯವಳೆ amele ಐಹೊಳೆ anta change aythu
Thank you for the information.
@@JayVardhanSinghbro if you upload subtitles in major foreign languages then even foreigners can watch it.
@@yeshwitejpratap1767he is speaking in English , isn't that enough?
@@Griffith_1802 bro market for history youtubers is more in foreign. Majority of foreigners understand English
Sir can you make a video on rashtrakutas and tripartite struggle
Also thanks to kannada kingdoms to stop early attempts of arab invasions ie from 7th century to 10th century.
Please make video on Rashtakuta king Govinda III conquest of North India
Govinda, Dhruva, Indra, Krishna, Amoghavarsha and the list goes on
@@NaDadiga dhruva and Amoghavarsha never did anything lol . Muh conquest.
Govinda defeated nagabhata true , and Indra simply sacked kannauj and returned back.
@@NaDadigalist goes on lmao .even govinda conquest of malwa lasted less than a decade.
Rashtrakutas even lost late just post his death.
What is Krishna doing there, capturing 2 forts
@@rowlattgamer3355 Krishna the 3rd. Yes most of them were temporary but the history always kept repeating. Every time a Rashtrakuta ruler went on a "Dandayatra" to capture Kannauj, they never failed. Also it's important to note that they wielded their influence all over India. During the tripartite struggle, out of the three empires, they were the most dominant. It was only after the Rashtrakuta's decline that Gurjaras became a dominant power becoming the ultimate victors of the tripartite struggle. Also they had pan India influence who controlled territories from the Himalayas to Sri Lanka.
@@NaDadiga muh Himalayas. The only time they reached kannauj/sacked it was under Indra 3 because that.
Krishna 3 captured only forts in bundelkhand.
Harshavardhana. Don't forget the a, the schwa deletion had not occurred yet.
Its Harshvardhan. That's how its said in North. Dont teach us
Its Bharat not bharata....
Means in history most of the time Maharashtra is part of southern kingdoms.
Please make a video on karkota dynasty🙏
wonderful
In the point of the cause of the conflict, you are quite right as control of the sea ports in Gujarat coast for martime trade was the real bone of contention like in the case of the great Gupta emperors Samudra Gupta and Chandra Gupta
You have something stuck in your hair
😂😂😂
Lol
Haha
Not by the end of the video
😂😂😂
Hi Jay. It would draw more viewers if you show more pics/portraits on screen and keep your story telling in the background.
Best wishes
Now who are the Parsi refugees who came to India in the 7th century?
@@srikantamahananda1603 they are living in gujrat many cities
anyone watching from Nepal??
hey do u know know any indo-greek / BMAC remains in present day india(northwest) or Uzbekistan. for the purposes of tourism & sightseeing lost cities
Sorry, I don't know about this.
Interesting video. At the same time, we find that the Gurjara ruler Dadda II helped the Maitrakas against Harsha. So, the Maitrakas were Harsha's feudelities does not make sense
Why this kingsdoms and empires were not in my education textbook ?
How do you verify the authenticity of the copper inscripition? how do you know it's not a plant ? it reminded me of the Piltdown skull story.
The copper plate mentions that the sacred ceremony of Ashwamedh yagya was performed immediately after the battle with Harshvardhan and the donations to brahmin were made on the "...नवमवर्षे वैशाखपूर्णिमे चंद्रग्रहणदिवसें... " which means, in the ninth regnal year of his coronation, when there was the full moon of Vaishakha and the lunar eclipse on the same day... When this astronomical incident cross checked by the astronomers, three dates of the seventh century were found when there was a full moon of Vaishakha and the lunar eclipse on the same day! These dates were 26th April 617, 15th April 618 and 04th April 619. On this basis, it was confirmed that the copper plates found, were true and not DP.
Also these plates were sold to a dcrap dealer and then donated to a museum, no one made any money from them.
Seemd like a far strech that someone will like to go through the struggle of creating them about some obscure battle and then no t even make money from them.
@@AbhayPeshin The person who sold it to the scrab dealer was not aware of its archaeological value, as he was not able to read the matter written on it. The history lover got it from the scrab vendor all of a sudden. When he saw the script on it, he understood its historical importance. Hence he handed it over to the archeological department.
Make a video series on tripartite struggle
Great Kshtriya King Harshwardhn Bais | 🙏🚩🚩🚩
Harshavardhan was a Pushyabhuti monarch not a bhais monarch
@@stormshadow5283 He Was Bais ✌️
@@greatkaafir7478 Harshavardhan Pushyabhuti not harshavardhan bhais
@@stormshadow5283 Lol He Was Bais Kshtriya
@@greatkaafir7478 lmao we wuZZ Bais and shieet.
Because you are a meticulous history teller,I am asking you this question:
1)Did Hiuen Tsang (Xuan zang)mention the word "Maharashtra" in his description of Pulakesi as the ruler of that land?
2)What is the language and script of copper plates found in 2016 in Bijapur?Sanskrit/Devnagari or Kannada/Kannada?
3)"Aihole"(Kannada word)should be pronounced as Ai-Holai(last "e" should be as in chole)
About your first question, the word Maharashtra has been used by the scholar who has translated Xuanzang's work from Chinese to English. So, probably, he has used something like Maharashtra. About your second question, the language is Sanskrit and the script is the southern variety of Brahmi. About the third question, yes my pronunciation of the word is not correct, thanks for mentioning it.
@JayVardhanSingh Thank you but I have my own doubts about that translator scholar.I will find out myself.
It is highly improbable that a land was called "Maha-Rastra" in the 7th century CE.
Thank you for your response.
What r u trying to say, are u expecting live commentary or WhatsApp chat for the event that happened 1800 years ago, the only source of information is through inscription and for ur kind information there is nothing called as draw in a war and why will Harshavarshan write a inscription that he lost battle finally the great Pulikeshi won and since Harsha surrendered, Pulikeshi spared his life and land so Harsha never came to south.
Inscriptions are of 100yrs later after the war harshavardhan was great bais rajput ruled larger area meanwhile chalukyas who originally came from ayodhya mentioned in there inscriptions ruled a much smaller are
Harsha is not bias rajbut he was pushyabuthi king and secondly the inscriptions available were from contemporary source
@mithuns8661 pushyabhuti is the name of the first king he was from bais rajput royal clan of haryana even chinese traveller xuanzang mentioned him kshatriya of vais(bais) clan
@@MohanKumar-pv4zu all kshatriyas are not rajputs come out of this delusion
were lata and gurjara kingdoms different ?
Jai Karnat bala.
Make video on Govinda 3 of Rashtrakoot s
Karnatbala is not lineage rather geographical identity like kannauj lata gurjara etc
Karnata bala is the army name of pulikeshi which eventually become Karnataka
@mithuns8661 karntaa bala gurjara pati kaanuajiya are geographical identity associated with there ruling classes
@@kiranshettyv5946 abe gade ke gaand it's army name of pulikeshi not any geographic description......if you don't the facts then stfu and stay quite
U need to. Start including maps in vids
Nice map. What do you use in mapmaking?
Photoshop
It's Aihole not Aihol
ऐहोल ❌
ऐहोले ✅
बापत ❎ बापट ✅
its PULAKESHI not pulakeshan.... if you dont know real names dont make history videos by reading wiki
Boss its "Puli"+"Keshi", meaning "Tiger"+"Hair/Beard" and not "Pulakeshin".
In Chalukya Inscriptions he's referred to as either Pulikeshin or Polekeshin.
@@anirudh177 Boss Iam from Karnataka and Iam quite aware of the differences between the old Kannada and the modern day Kannada. Whatever you are referring to has no literal meaning. "Puli" is an Old Kannada word meaning tiger and today in Kannada it is referred to as "Huli". "Keshi" is derived from "Kesha" which means hair in Sanskrit.
In writing it is written as pulakesin in the inscription
@@ArvindKumar-rl7vs
In Kannada there is no addition of 'n' at the end
@@savitar8002
Its not kannada
todays time when we have every second captured then there is our history where not even the great Empires are told much.
As per Hindu Scriptures, the region of Lata is from Narmada to Sabarmati or from Narmada to Mahi river region.
We have so many accounts of wars and battles in ancient India but so little info about weapons, equipments and tactics. This is opposite to Chinese and Roman records where we find ample evidence.
Kannada kula tilaka Dakshina Patheshwara, ಇಮ್ಮಡಿ ಪುಲಕೇಶಿ 🫡🫡
I think you are spelling some of kingdom in wrong way … it should be said differently…. Example Lata or Kalachuri … we hear it differently from most here in South. Even Pulakeshin is Pulakeshi with no n… even Aihole … you are spelling it wrong very wrong indeed 😅
Pulakeshi, not Pulakeshin. Karnataka
🎉
I read a article of shankar goyal, that this battle simply was one of the battles of the ongoing struggle between two.
I beleive xuanzang also says , harsha has conquered vindhyas and some chunk south of narmada
I think your videos will work better if you do them in a question-answer format. Get a co-host who can ask scripted and unscripted questions.
Bhai Kya JNU me part time PhD allow h ? in history
Thattthh
Harsh”a” vardhan”a” am sorry I couldn’t stop myself from correcting it. My brain started itching.
Not pulakeshin it is pulakeshi
It's like Konkan. We say Kokan, not Konkan. But there is a slight nasal note after Ko, which is why it's written as Konkan. Similarly Pulakeshi has a nasal note after keshi, which is why it can be written as Pulakeshin.
@@sameerthakur720 all kannada inscriptions call him PULAKESHI not keshan, only kongas called him like that.
Isn't there some inscription in the north which says that Harsha had won the battle against Pulakeshin?
Banabatta writings
I haven't come across any such inscription
@@JayVardhanSingh I can't recollect, but I remember my prof saying about some contradicting sources on the battle between harsha and pulakeshin. If there is nothing on this, then maybe it was some other personality or battle. It's been very long time, so my memory is not clear.
In my research, I haven't come across any such evidence. In Harsha's inscription or in Harshacharita this battle is not mentioned. Even Xuanzang doesn't mention this battle.
Xuanzang is a lier@@JayVardhanSingh
Thanks for sharing reference of this relatively new discovery in 2016. I read the paper, their logic is correct.
So now that we know that since this battle occured relatively earlier in the reigns of both monarchs, what would have happened in the next 2 decades that both of them ruled over their respective empires. If the Maitraka ruler was Harsha's son-in-law then it seems eventually they did come under Harsha's sphere of influence..on the other hand we know that Chalukyas continued to rule Lata region, maybe Gurjara as well, so the honours were divided I suppose
Chalukyas was the greatest Kannada emperor.
If u know the exact date then u should first mension that...rather than other dates
So did harsha died in the war of narmda ?
Had these both allied together..arabs would not have invaded sindh
why would they? 😂
Pulikeshi already defeated arabs twice and also had great influence at middle east
let alone accuracy of the happenings the incorrect pronunciation of the names of people in the discussion perhaps due to the language is from the region they don't like , and this shows disregard for that region.this disregard for that particular region shows disregard for a part of india .
Jay vardhan singh make video of maharaja immadi pullikeshi ll vs islamic caliphate
And vikramadithya pullikeshi & his army karnatabala general avenjeshraya pullikeshi vs islamic caliphate
Yo bro, ಪುಲಿಕೇಶಿ ತನ್ನ ನೌಕಪಡೆಯಿಂದ ಅರಬ್ಬರನ್ನು ಹಿಮ್ಮೆಟ್ಟಿಸಿದ ಎನ್ನುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಯಾವುದಾದರೂ ಗಟ್ಟಿ ಪುರಾವೆಗಳು ನಿಮಗೆ ದೊರಕಿದ್ಯಾ? ಇದ್ದರೆ ಅವುಗಳನ್ನು ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಿಸಲು ನನ್ನ ಬೇಡಿಕೆ 🙏.
Narration put me off. Felt like each word has a comma after it.
Harshavardhana wanted pulakesin to talk in hindi but pulakesin was adamant about talking in kannada 🤣🤣. That led to battle.
Hindi language was not born that duration
Even Marathi Hindi languages was not born that duration
Yeah we in North india used to talk in kannada.. also in aliens used to talk kannada in mars and Pluto..but jupiter non kannada aliens became angry and they told scientists to remove pluto aa 9th planet from our solar system..
Oh sorry I wrote this in English..please translate this in Kannada 😂😢😮😅
Pulkeshi ancestors rana and jai singh came from ayodhya still ruled larger area also sacked chalukya capital before 😂
Its not Pulakeshin its Pulakeshi
Knitpicking kerne aagye sab...khud kuch na pta ho but knitpicking zaruri hai
Palakeshin hai pulskeshin nahi hai aur bhatraka nahi bharata ka hai, history walo ne name kharab kr rakha hai, pala Empire se bachee dartee hai.😂😂😂😂
Maitraka ..king khargra,
Lata ...laka ....
Mr Fake Historian, Immadi Pulakeshin goes into history books of India as one of the greatest emperors India has ever seen, he overcame a civil war internally with his uncle, he created the great Kannada invincible army known as “Karnata Bala Ajeyam” he is known as father of Indian Navy war tactics, he defeated the Pallavas and killed the king Mahendraverma in battlefield by uniting Kannada army, when Harsha thought Pulakeshi was a pushover,a unique battle technique was used against 5lakh soldiers of Harsha army, that unique method is “Intoxicating elephants with alcohol” inscriptions talks about how the Elephants went crazy and starting stamping Harsha army and his dream,seeing this sight Harsha got to his knees seeing this Pulakeshi gave him a choice and stopped the bloodshed, that’s when Harsha gave him two titles “Parmeshwara” Dakshinapatheshwara and Pulakeshin gave back Harsha his lands because it was humiliation for Harsha, however as per Dharma Pulakeshin followed the right path..Pulakeshi had also gone all the way to Iran to help Persians and stop the Caliphate movement..Chalukya dynasty is pride of Karnataka, India and Kannada❤
Long live the brave Kannada King Pulak.
But why bad mouth this little boy pursuing his scholarly studies? PhD please be civilized
@@devyanilimaye8560 you forgot how to read my summary, you pretty much get enlightened the amount of information I have provided, I do feel you came to discuss here something..
Lol emperor he wasn't a emperor he was a king
Emperor are samundragupta chandragupta vikramaditya
Rajendra chola
These were emperor and not pulkeshin or harshvardhan
@@deep264
Source? Trust me bro.
Harsha defeated n number of cheftains to retain the northern heartland but had to bite his dust to Pulikesi who dominated central south , and the same pulikesi was beaten by southern Pallava king despite support of smaller cheftains... it is like the Bihar Regminet ran over martial clans of north Inida (rajputs, dogras, sikhs, JakLi, Punjab etc) to be beaten by Bombay Sappers.. who inturn got beater by Madras regiment.... what a bloody history of guys fighting each other for riverine territory to collect taxes of hardworking peasantry! ....SHAME..... cut to 2023, every quarter finance ministers of all states come together to share the GST, people from diverse family background take a career in army as soldiers, grow to be generals not to overthrow the ruler but to peacefully retire and sip quota liquour in thier army mess.. and regime changes are bloodless thru the ballot .... such mein amrit kaal!..
It is Harshavardhana and pulikeshi
Kannad chapris getting triggered by pronunciations.....
See this is what's going to happen if you impose Hindi on Kannadiga's 😂
Nobody's imposing anything on Kannadigas, other than Kannada Politicians. They are identifying problems but not solutions. They will thrive on this Kannadigas hatred fpr Hindi speakers.
@neerajsahu4 BengLoli the most backwards region in the country, cannot take your opinion seriously.
Harshavardhan still sacked the capital also chalukya solankis originally came from ayodhya 😂
@RanvijayRana23 that's new for me where did you learn that
@ read the inscriptions of chalukyas
Though king Pulakeshin II won this war he is not too much remembered by Indian people. But the name of Harshavardhan is on the lips of Indians. Samrat Harshavardhan is supposed to be the last Buddhist king. He did a lot of reformations in India. If he had won this war ,the picture of India would have been very progressive. He is still blamed for killing 800 Brahmins,but that is not true. He accepted Buddhism and only because of this he is hated by Brahmins and Hindus.
Samrat harshavardhan buddhist nhi thr gadhe bakwas mat kar if you have asss proove harshvardhan buddhist sources doesn't proof he was buddhist just claiming shows your brainlessness and when he was hated by brahmin harshcharit was written by badbhatta who was brahmin you would not have known much about harshvardhan if a brahmin badbhatta didn't wrote harshcharita neo buddhist are brainless they don't have any proofs to show just barking brainlessly and claiming everyone buddhist
Where it is mentioned he was budhhist lol ?😂
He never expected buddhism
Pulikeshi II is very much remembered in Karnataka and Maharastra
In WhatsApp University it's mentioned they makes claim in their own mind @@50centgamer65
Immadi pullakeshin was also busy fighting arab rulers at that time
He wasn't alone
He the man who defeated Harshavardhana was defeated by the Pallava king NarasimaVarman I, Most of greatest Tamil bakthi poems were written during his time, His general Paranjothiyar who led the army ferociously into Chalukyas fort bring back the Ganapathi statue of Vathapi, It is still in Tamil nadu, Worshipped as Vathapi Ganapathi.
A folklore was written about this war called Sivagamiyin sapatham in tamil.
Its "Bapat - बापट" not बापत
thanks for the correction
Thank You for taking cognizance of the comments.... Keep bringing more educative content.... Great to see these History chapters something we didn't get during the childhood era....
ಯಾರ್ಯಾರು ಕನ್ನಡಿಗರು ಇದನ್ನು ನೋಡ್ತಾ ಇದ್ದೀರಾ
Karnatabalam Ajeyam bro you need to rethink your views 😉😉😉😉😉😉