They all sound great. 1&3 probably the most useful for gigs - over the years I’ve always found you don’t want too many controls on a unit that’s down on the floor. Perhaps 2 is more practical for use in a studio, sitting on your desk, it could be hard to find your way round on a gig.
I suggest to all the people writing that it is too thin to try on of these products connected to a real cabinet. I connected it to the cabinet of a Fender Frontman 212 and it was amazing, louder, full of attack, wit real Fender tones. I was using the US voice with the gain and middle around 15, and Highs at 12, and a Tube Screamer
I own an Amped 1, and basically it is a vintage voiced ampli with modern outputs, for the mixer or for the computer. As someone already wrote the US voice is a Fender inspired but it tends to be very thin. It is an amplifier that does.not produce gain, and in order to get a fatter sound you need to raise the gain around 15, you need ti use a 1*12 USA cabinet and use EL34 valve types, because the 6L6 are too glassy. Once configured in this way it takes perfectly pedals, and produce very good overdriven tones.
I don't know if it's the guitar or the Ampeds or a bit of both, but the sounds were very digitally and metallic in the video. I've been thinking about getting one of these for recording, but my preference is for plummy, Peter Green tones and I'm wondering if any of these bits of kit would be capable of that.
I looking for a power amp to my ME 90 that has a lots effects and sims so amped II seems like a overkill. Any suggestions even if Blackstar is not included?
The people who have been raised on cheap practice amps, modelers, software, and solid state/class D crap...they think this stuff actually sounds great. HAHA!
Thanks for the review , I just got the black one, I'm really loving it :)
They all sound great. 1&3 probably the most useful for gigs - over the years I’ve always found you don’t want too many controls on a unit that’s down on the floor. Perhaps 2 is more practical for use in a studio, sitting on your desk, it could be hard to find your way round on a gig.
I suggest to all the people writing that it is too thin to try on of these products connected to a real cabinet. I connected it to the cabinet of a Fender Frontman 212 and it was amazing, louder, full of attack, wit real Fender tones. I was using the US voice with the gain and middle around 15, and Highs at 12, and a Tube Screamer
I own an Amped 1, and basically it is a vintage voiced ampli with modern outputs, for the mixer or for the computer. As someone already wrote the US voice is a Fender inspired but it tends to be very thin. It is an amplifier that does.not produce gain, and in order to get a fatter sound you need to raise the gain around 15, you need ti use a 1*12 USA cabinet and use EL34 valve types, because the 6L6 are too glassy. Once configured in this way it takes perfectly pedals, and produce very good overdriven tones.
I don't know if it's the guitar or the Ampeds or a bit of both, but the sounds were very digitally and metallic in the video. I've been thinking about getting one of these for recording, but my preference is for plummy, Peter Green tones and I'm wondering if any of these bits of kit would be capable of that.
YEH, i AGREE, I FEEL THE SAME, SOUNDED THIN.... UAD LION LOOKS A CORKER..
I looking for a power amp to my ME 90 that has a lots effects and sims so amped II seems like a overkill. Any suggestions even if Blackstar is not included?
I rig AMPED 3 with BOSS GT1000.
mind blowing sounds
15:50 I'm confused isn't there compression in this preset?
The people who have been raised on cheap practice amps, modelers, software, and solid state/class D crap...they think this stuff actually sounds great. HAHA!
Sounds way too bright to me on all channels.
That's ISF. Move to the right and your sound will be more warm and dark
Sounds thin, not impressed from this demo.