I have two theories: 1) Rufus is a real person but English isn't his first language, and he only learned cryptobro buzzwords on Twitter or 2) Rufus is an AI, the Rufus account is the real test of AI to create an AI that can replicate a guy who thinks that he can make real movies with AI
rufus is an ancient king who ruled a kingdom hundreds of years ago and he was stuck in a well until someone accidentally dropped their phone down to him and now he is stuck with his own AI servant who makes movies for him
I like when Princess Jane dematerialized into thousands of microscopic locusts to strike fear into fellow kingdoms knowing their crop yield can be at absolutely obliterated at any moment. Rufus is truly a visionary
Unironically this comment shows why AI is so shit at creating “art”: it by nature can’t be original. It can’t make the same associations that we can or understand social/cultural cues in any meaningful way. It has trouble with metaphors and symbolism, in large part because it doesn’t have intention in mind. It can’t be funny in a human way. Roundabout way of saying your comment was genius.
@@hopeboyherewithyourmcdonal3634because it is? AI's main thing is that it's relies on our inputs, and sometimes those inputs are "lost in translation" so to speak hence all the uncanny bits about them, from disfigured hand and fingers, the super basic shading background, the uniformed skin tone, etc
Just be careful not to go too far in the other direction and demonise all the hard workers who use AI as a part of their job. Even RUclipsrs use AI to clean up their audio, cut our dead air, animate certain parts etc. - despite all the hard work they do. Yet AI has become such a stigma now that any association gets criticised.
I refuse to believe this is genuine, this has to be satire. If Rufus isn't a troll account making shitty "AI" animations to make fun of AI Art culture then I don't know what is
Did someone make an AI generated twitter account with the prompt "annoying AI bro who wants to make movies with AI but doesn't seem to understand how films or AI actually work" ?
and he starts it by saying “bah!” like a disgruntled tavern dweller listening in on nearby adventurers discussing legends of a buried treasure, thinking how absurd it is that some people would believe such puerile rumors
She is stuck in an infinite loop, disintegrating and reforming constantly. Her pain is immeasurable on each run through, but her consciousness is reset every time, leading her to experience the same unimaginable damage over and over and over, never stopping, being numbed by the repetition, but never being able to escape it. This being had no reason to exist, except _Rufus_ insisted upon her existence, to show her potential, but unknowingly showed their own disgusting power and influence on their awful “creations”.
Rufus' attempt at "recreating" the Tasmanian tiger is especially funny to me because you can see how much the AI wanted to take the tiger part as literally as it could (notice how the AI video has them with striped faces when in real life, they only have stripes on their back). Also we literally have photos and footage of Tasmanian tigers (including full blown specimens and taxidermy mounts!), so getting AI to make its own recreations is just plain redundant.
When I saw that shit, all I could think was "Oh look, Ingen decided to do a collab with Happy Meat Farms." (Also, something else that makes no sense: Why didn't Rufus simply type "thylacine" into the prompt instead to try to avoid the inevitable tiger confusion? XD)
Honestly I pity AI "artists". Many of them view art as a means to an end, unaware of how enjoyable and fun the process is. Living a life devoid of passion must be hard.
I pity them too. They want to be part of the creative process, they want their ideas to be realised, but they lack the confidence in their own skill and the patience to develope it. Have you seen that tweet where an ai guy shows how much money he pays per month on ai image generators? It's around $300. Imagine paying that much to not learn how to draw
@@fudgen.a1249 True, a lot of them actively hate artists and the mediums they work in. They _want_ ai put all artists out of a job. The idea makes them happy. How can you hate something so much while demanding more of it? It's like that one saying sex workers have, "they point with one hand and jerk it with the other."
Why's she saying "Hello my name is princess jane" with the passive aggressive intonation of a primary school teacher trying to keep it together for the last couple hours of a schoolday?
I'm convinced ai dudes don't actually understand what makes a movie a movie. they think as along as they have series of visuals haphazardly stitched together its not only a movie but a good movie. theres no themes, no character development, no symbolism, no PLOT. Something one my teachers told me that I think applies here is "A movie that is just something pretty to look at without any substance behind it is just a music video, and not even a good music video at that."
They don't understand why people like art. Sometimes it's hard to believe there are actual people out there that have no idea why a movie or art is good, but they exist. What they are doing is basically like: they go to a restaurant, order 2 different plates of food, and when the food arrives, they mix the two food dishes together. Then call themselves a chef. They go around telling people how easy it is to become a chef and you don't have to actually learn how to cook to become a chef. But everyone else is giving them weird looks because all they did was mix a cake into a soup and made it uneatable.
I could never be a Rufus hater. This man is doing the (unintentionally?) funniest things I’ve ever seen anyone do with AI generation. It looks so absolutely awful and nightmarish and he’s so confident about it I can’t help but love him.
i do feel kind of sad for him with the amount of hatred he's getting when he also seems interested in trying to make his own things and like he's always wanted to but been afraid. i want him to get more encouragement to move in the right direction instead of just copying things
Imagine some person saying "look what I made!" showing a shirt they bought on amazon, but to be fair they *did* type in the words to search for what they wanted and a shirt matching those words popped up
In an alternate universe where that would somehow make sense, I "made" a rug and room thermometer in the past week alone and both took less than a day 😂
I used to make videos like his pirate movie in windows movie maker in middle school, except with hot wolf people. I think I used my time better Also much love to the community since Pinelys untimely murder
the king's crown flopping around like jelly when he moved his head made me a tiny bit less worried about AI taking over the film industry, unless it was meant to be made out of melted gold no but really AI "art" makes me sad and worried as someone in the industry. i'm lucky that my job (tattooing) is incredibly difficult if not impossible to replace with an AI, sure you could do the designs with it but not the actual tattooing process, but fuck i'm feeling scared on behalf of animators, screenwriters, concept artists etc
Thankfully there are some thing us humans have over AI. Our own experiences and visual library. Ability to go back and change aspects of our creative work; to fine out the details. Ability to experiment. Ai doesn't "think" like that. Sure it might looks fine, in some aspects, but it will always be limited.
@@simonecesarlastname1852n Ai doesn't think at all tbh, as long as you're creative and your employer respects your craft you'll be fine. It isn't about if the ai is good but rather if companies try to take the easy way out.
seriously. i'm an artist and an aspiring animator, and all of this AI stuff really pisses me off. the AI has no personality and human attributes and completely rids the art of uniqueness. it pisses me off that people would prefer manufactured art over human art that actually has meaning. with 2d animation, you can slow it down and see the different beats. animation isn't typically a fluid 12fps, it can be on 2s or 3s or even a mixture to help with motion. AI animation is a constant fluid 12fps, from what jve seen, and is way too clean. it just throws up the same anime artsyle or semi realistic artstyle. animation is such a brilliant form of art and it sucks to see people with no talent trying to fake their way to talent with AI. sorry for the rant but i really needed to dump this somewhere that people would understand 👍 i agree with 100% of your comment and luckily a lot of people seem to share the opinion that AI art isnt actually art, it's just a loud few from what ive seen.
It might just be me, but it seems improvement has slowed down a little from a new mind blowing model releasing every week. It'll probably just be like most technologies where it speeds up exponentially, then plateaus off, for more complex creations like in the film industry, i seriously doubt it'll replace humans.
@@cuckoobrain7999It was very funny applause that got people to laugh so it's kinda a laugh track. You're right, I just think I'm funny 😂 Don't mind me.
@commandercorl1544 I used to work at subway during the summer a year ago. One particular day, a filthy, smelly-ass homeless dude came in to order, but before he left he shat in the bathroom and covered in head to toe in his crap. The toilet, the floor, the walls...the scent was indescribable. The worse thing to ever assault my nostrils. One of my coworkers had to take the next day off to deal with the trauma of cleaning it with me. Never, NEVER take food workers for granted.
my friends n I all got so obsessed with princess jane that we made our own sans undertale style princess jane au ocs. we didn’t want to use ai so we fucking photobashed them. we have an entire doc of lore at this point. thank you rufus from the bottom of my heart, the princess jane multiverse has been so fun to explore
It's because AI art is accessible to lots of people, many of them aren't actual artists. AI art is still intriguing to real artists. The MoMA has an AI-generated piece on display right now and it is brilliant, unlike anything I've ever seen before. When I was there, everyone was mouth agape staring at it.
Maybe I’m paranoid, but rufus seems like a bunch of undisclosed ads. Like, between naming the programs being used and hyping them up it gave me the same vibe as undisclosed ads on TikTok
The issue to me is that people think that they can use AI to entirely replace the creative process rather than assist it. I could see some cool, intentional uses of AI to compliment man-made work, but 99% of the time you get people like rufus who suddenly think they're a filmmaker because they typed up a prompt and slapped some music and text over it. AI is not magic, and it will never fully be able to replace something a human made with intent.
"I hope AI never gets better" - YES, exactly! The most compelling AI-generated media I've seen heavily leaned into all the jank and various inperfections of the technology. AI developers seek to minimize those inperfections but artists should be embracing them instead - consciously or otherwise
"Whatever you now find weird, ugly, uncomfortable and nasty about a new medium will surely become its signature. CD distortion, the jitteriness of digital video, the crap sound of 8-bit - all of these will be cherished and emulated as soon as they can be avoided. It’s the sound of failure: so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart. The distorted guitar sound is the sound of something too loud for the medium supposed to carry it. The blues singer with the cracked voice is the sound of an emotional cry too powerful for the throat that releases it. The excitement of grainy film, of bleached-out black and white, is the excitement of witnessing events too momentous for the medium assigned to record them." Brian Eno, from "A Year With Swollen Appendices."
Artists wanna get rid of ai cuz they're mad there's something better that can replace them lmao The art community is vile and toxic, I've had absoloutely horrible experiences with artists, they're psychotic scumbags who abuse and take advantage of others, they scam people, they harass people, I've been given death threats and even doxxed by artists, the art community is godawful. Ai does none of that, you type in a sentence, you get what you want, ai doesnt harass you or spam you with death threats, ai doesn't abuse others, they aren't psychotic, they just..give you what you typed in, no drama, no hassle, unlike real artists lmao
@@tedtheodore5715 You don't just type in a sentence and get what you want... You have to reconfigure and specilize your prompt about 10 times (plus just trying to see if the issue you're having is rare. The misconseption that AI is just type a sentence and get a pretty stolen picture is exactly what artists are shitting their pants about.
@@tedtheodore5715 cool, but two problems Any community on earth will have those dudes that do that stuff Comercial, religious, even random hobbies you have will have scammers and all that weird stuff Also, ai is kinda unlikely to replace artists, because well, anything ai can do, we can do way better, one thing it that you kinda can't appreciate anything in it, other than it just looks very cool, not much hard work, maybe you could consider fixing the prompt 30 billion times the hard work And oh yeah, ai needs human inputs to do it's job So basically we just pressing a "free art" button but also expecting it to replace stuff like movies or animation itself Conclusion: ai art is cool, could be used to make some interesting stuff if you can't do the stuff you're thinking, however it can't compete with us humans when it comes to this topic, it's all about creativity y'know. (like damn I know people said the same about other stuff in the past but I don't think industrialization is the same as drawing the Monalisa) Anyway, 60 seconds pfp
AI has so much potential to make tedious and detail oriented work faster and more fun. It has a lot of potential to help artists and... people are using it for this?... AI is gonna be ruined by NFT bros isn't it...
Exactly like the ai tools in photoshop that have existed for years already is so helpful, hate to see crypto bros ruin yet another potentially useful invention
"Hey, could you come up with a smear frame between these two frames" could be so useful for solo animators trying to get good at doing smear frames by using a generated one as a reference on where to start. But no, crypto bros gotta ruin everything.
@@rambblerI think clip studio has had an ai unbetween animation system for a while now? I might be misremembering a lot of that but from what I remember it helps animate the inbetweens so the animators can animate with more detail. Or maybe I imagined that fact in a fever dream??? I’m like 70% sure I’m remembering correctly
It's a valid tool though, it's great to use for concept art and stuff, the only thing I hate about AI art is the fact that people are calling themselves 'artists' for typing out a prompt.
If I told any of these new AI people that AI has been around for a long time and it’s not a brand new concept, their heads would explode. AI is already in use in production sites, it’s been used as a tool in animation for forever.
The lo-fi "animation" makes me a bit sad to see I sometimes tune into lo-fi radio streams, and while you're there for the music, it's nice to have some good visuals, usually just some art of someone studying or looking out over a balcony or wherever, good chill stuff But I've noticed that there's been a lot more of these popping up with blatantly AI generated images for their visuals, very similarly to that mess that Evil Pinely shows off at around 8:36 It just becomes distracting, like, street lamps and posts melting, structures not looking right, objects on top of tables or desks just not looking as they should There's no shortage of actual art or renders of places to use, some streams even use actual footage of real places (like Tokyo, New York, or Seoul), but such streams just... don't care, just generate a non-euclidean mess and call it a day
THANK YOU!! I've seen this too it's so creepy and uncanny but nobody else says anything about it. Maybe they do it so they dont have to credit any artist or photographers but man.. Sometimes I wonder if some of the songs themselves are ai too
Yeah absolutely! An AI program can't deliberately convey mood or composition, which is kind of important when you want to match the mood of the music and give your viewer's eyes something to explore. In the generated example in this video, the styles for the background, animated bits, and character "art" were all mismatched and incompatible, and the composition was a disaster. The only face on-screen tucked all the way to the edge of the shot, the other person just off-center, both figures so low down, the animated section being this strip that doesn't point the eyes anywhere specific. It's a trainwreck of an image
Ai could be used super well for abstract dream sequences or otherworldly lovecraftian creatures or scenes with how bizarre and weird but recognizable the things it creates are in a way that can be hard for humans to replicate, but instead we get people trying to just replace humans with ai all together instead of working with ai to make cool things :(
honestly i think ai would work really well if you had a program that you had to draw it. like you need to make a few sketches of your own and you cant import any images so people cant steal other artists work, and after youre done sketching you put in a couple prompts and the ai will take what youve make and create some larger & more dreamlike images out of it
AI can be used by artists as inspiration in their art or ideas during creative blocks and it is used that way. The currently popular use is so awful and has such terrifying implications that a lot of people throw the baby out with the bathwater. BUT it's not only that, there are artists starting discussions about having a more nuanced take. Hopefully that trend continues. Doesn't solve the issues with its current popular use unfortunately but the nuance is being nurtured at least.
@@kamilululu2515 yeah unfortunately :,^) i feel like ai could have been used for stuff like webcomics though cuz the artist could feed it their work and the ai could help out with backgrounds and stuff to lessen the massive workload
I for one would love to see a full 130 minute movie delivered entirely by characters in mismatched art styles speaking directly to the camera while only moving their faces, and text over scenic shots.
i’m sorry but i can’t get over the fact that the princess is basically the lisa rinna m&m jiafei cupcakke meme, like there were already so many layers to that meme already😭
This reminds me of the guy who got exceptionally angry that my girlfriend didn't accept his 'gift' of an AI generated pfp, but instead kept the one I drew for her. He blocked both of us and then apparently left the internet. Oops.
@@studystudy3753 Yeah. He kept trying to win my friends over (we're a group of artists, btw) by sending them the same kind of AI crap. Like, gee, wonder why we wouldn't like it, huh?
After witnesing the pure talent and genuis of Rufus I've officially decided to drop out of my animation course and give up my creative endeavors, for nothing I work on, nothing I bring into this world, could ever emulate a fraction of the pure talent emenating from his works. I once thought hard work was the way to go, that the years I've spent building up skills would one day pay off and be recognized by the world, alas, I have been humbled in the face of a true masterpiece. My hubris was my downfall, and I see now what a fool I was to waste my life in pursuit of something that was never mine to claim. Here, I lay down my pen, and step down as an 'artist' to let the true creators of the world take my place. Thank you, Rufus, for showing me the light, and for exposing the ruthless hypocrisy of my small-minded ways. I hope all 'artists' and 'animators' will follow soon, and retire to make way for the art of the future. Amen 🙏
The best use of the kind of AI "style" where everything is kind of uncanny and fluid is the music video for *Iron Lung by King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard.* I think it's basically different artworks that match the music, but AI has interpolated between them. It's a very psychedelic, slightly unnerving song, so it actually works really well.
I genuinely miss older AI art where the weird psychedelic stuff was what you got 90% of the time, it's something that a real artist could never truly recreate... These days they just try to replicate something that already exists, unless you purposefully try to break it, or do something it's not perfected yet, like videos!
Have you seen the music video of Atropos by Periphery? It's used to give off this apocalyptic feeling of how technology is distracting us while the world around us is being destroyed. Like the A.I. layer of reality is smothering the humanity beneath it.
@@lovesick_loser AI still is mostly useful for weird psychedelic stuff, it's absolutely fucking terrible at making anything that makes sense. I've played around with it a few times out of curiosity and its a pain in the ass to try and wrangle the ai into making something that makes sense. You could give an elephant a paintbrush and get it to paint something better than what most ai can do.
"well this goes against some things i believe in" this is so unreasonably funny to me thank u pinely. im gonna start saying this about virtually everything i encounter and im so excited. 😌
Thank you soooo much for using your platform to call out AI "artists!" It's times like this that make me cherish the artists look up to even more. Think of everything Richard Williams has done in his career as an animator and then watch any of these... It really makes you appreciate the work people put into their passion. If thylacines had actually looked like that in real life, then no wonder they'd gone extinct... creatures of nightmares... with love, a small starving artist who hates this AI garbage and loves animation
its genuinely a shame that people like rufus are the reason creators like Austin McConnell get so much shit for trying to use AI as any part of their creative process, even if its to make certain aspects of art more accessible to people (all while those people who give them shit ignore all the ways they & their fav creators already use AI in a million little ways). The only relief/ humor i get out of this is that at least these people can't copyright their "creations" because as long as it was mostly made by a computer, that software or whatever is the legal "creator". so they dont really have a way to profit off of this shit bc people can just screenshot/record it & be completely within public domain while doing so. edited for small corrections to my wording
I agree with you that AI art would be better if it stayed where it is and stopped trying to achieve realism. It’s always going to look off if you try to do what a human could do- it should instead be trying to do what a human _can’t._ Unfortunately, the people who make these AI don’t seem interested in that. I once tried to see if I could get an AI image generator to make something surreal, like it was from a dream, since I couldn’t do it. I’m a bit too literal and struggle with making abstract stuff. The AI didn’t want to make what I wanted and kept trying to make realistic stuff- it looked off, but not in a surreal, dream-like manner. It just looked _bad._ So the AI was useless for both normal and surreal stuff, which is a shame. It could be used to make some neat things.
You're not the only one. It seems to be a product of how these AI algorithms handle data. They use tensors, which seem to produce these goop like artifacts. The algos have to condense a lot of data from the training data to pass the training process, so a lot of data compression is involved. Similar to how jpegs produce a lot of blocky shapes (a result of how data is compressed, what data is prioritized, and what data is lost,) because they deal with vectors, the AI produces visual artifacts that have a goop like effect. And its really gross looking.
It makes me feel... itchy when I see it, depending on what it is. Like there's bugs crawling in my hair and deep under my skin, and I feel the need to scratch them off. Lately, as more has cropped up, I've grown somewhat more resilient to the feeling, but it is still strong. AI art, especially in video form, looks... strange.
You know the modern horror thing about creatures that mimic humans,but end up looking uncanny Like Fake Peppino,skinwalkers and monsters from Mandela Catalogue Ai does the same thing to art
Maybe if he spent more than 5m in these AI generations it wouldn't be as bad, nor would it be so funny, so please keep it up thats hilarious Also the fact that these people talk about LLM and the current AI image/video generators like its magic and equivalent to a mind/creativity will never get old. How can you shout that nuch about how something is "the future" yet don't know/Undertale how it even works.....
The thing that fascinates me about AI wanna-be artists is that I get the appeal. I understand having all this images in one head and wanting them out but having no art skills and no time or energy or just interest in learning them. The difference was that when trying to draw started being frustrating because I'm impacient and have bad fine motor skill (I can't cut papper for life) I just decided to write. And it fitted. It was just a skill I found more joy learning and worked better for me personaly while helping me still put my characthers and ideas out just in a different way. I have no ilusions over being a good writer or even a published one but I like to write. It makes me happy to create scenarios and very few things are better or even equal than the satisfaction over finding the right word, of uncovering ever characther speak pattern and how they relate to the way they think abd their background, of just suddently knowing what happens next after days without a clue. And that's not me saying that AI wanna-be artists should write (they are already just using ChatGPT) but that both creating and putting genuine effort into things is a central part of the creative process and that there's likely a different way to express one's creativity that while they aren't necessarialy naturally talented at, they will find enjoyable to learn and partake and will be way better than typing. And so while they are awfull (and treat artists like crap) is almost sad they will never enjoy creating at all. Never actually like art. P.S: also based on the amount some of this people waste on AI crap just comission an artist. It might take longer and be a bit more expensive than AI but the results are waaaay better. It is just objective prettier but also and more important for me there is a satisfacion in knowing that someone actually made a real effort and time and actual work into that cool idea that exists in your head (in other words pay your artists!!). P.S. 2: sry for any grammatical erros english is not my first language and sometimes I end up mixing things.
On the topic of the "Soapy" Quality of AI images; I watched a video recently from a graphic designer, who pointed out ways to spot AI images now that they're getting more convincing. He showed how the different colour channels in the image have the exact same noise pattern. A real photograph with have different grainy patterns in each channel. The video is called "How to spot generative AI (Even if it has all 10 fingers and toes)" by Trancor, he explains it a lot better than I could!
i kind of wish the princess jane video was just some kind of surrealist comedy art animation piece like pilotredsun's work, because it would be infinitely funnier
Well, we know Pinely has an actual hand with functional fingers, and not a tumor growth with tiny appendages slowly being consumed by said malignant growth. Oh, and he blinks.
How has an artist or you learned to draw a dragon? No artist has seen a live dragon or taken their own reference photo of one-because dragons are not real. (Sorry for this disappointing newsflash.) Unless someone has managed to go their entire life only reading descriptions of dragons, their understanding and mental picture of dragons has been informed by countless previous depictions. Unlike cats, apples, or any other real-world thing, there's no way any artist arrived at their knowledge of dragons purely through lived experience. So if someone commissions an artist to create an image of a dragon, would the artist request permission from and/or compensate the creator of every dragon they'd ever seen? Obviously not. Similarly, there's no way a human can view the Milky Way in its entirety from afar; so our concept of how the Milky Way looks therefore draws entirely upon the creations of others and images of other galaxies. (Big cheers to the first artist who ever had to create a rendering of our galaxy.) And the same goes for any number of things no human has ever actually laid eyes on: vampires, black holes, Santa Claus, Sauron. All of this is essentially a recapitulation a broader point that's been made many times before: It would be disastrous to restrict artists to depicting only things they've seen in real life and/or which they have compensated/credited another creator for. I think most people can grasp this intellectually. But in the end, and as it nearly always does, the opposition is actually rooted in a perceived threat-and an economic one at that, since AI models are not ripping pencils and paint brushes out of anybody's hands.
@@UserName-zb8ql btw, Are you a Bot pr Something? Why Dont you have a Username? Or at least a Real Username that is not a Lame Ass "@UserName-zb8ql" lmfao
The only good use I've seen of AI generated images is when somebody used it just for flavor in a wholly original story and video series, and it was used to be intentionally uncomfortable and uncanny.
Imagine how blown away rufus would be if he ever saw a movie
I swear AI Bros feel unreal in the worst ways
Lmao truee
Somebody show this man spiderverse
@@brodieorr5393 i think hed actually die
Nah i genuinely believe he's a troll, a good one tho. Might watched his Clipchamp-generated Cinematic Universe (CGCU) lmao
That princess looks like she crawled out right out of a mobile game ad
it's so funny when you realize "princess jane" is just a recolor of the main character from that "sofia the first" children's cartoon
@@scaldcroweand she looks a few years older but otherwise she’s like one of those Sonic palette swap OCs.
SHE DOESN’T EVEN PROPERLY BLINK.
I'm in tears, the lip-syncing.. Its so bad XC
She didn't crawl, she skinwalked
This dude is making the movies that Sims watch
but like the low quality movies for Sims. The actual in game ones are better 😂
Hey don’t insult the movies in the sims like that they actually look somewhat decent compared to this lukewarm garbage
I have two theories: 1) Rufus is a real person but English isn't his first language, and he only learned cryptobro buzzwords on Twitter or 2) Rufus is an AI, the Rufus account is the real test of AI to create an AI that can replicate a guy who thinks that he can make real movies with AI
I'm wondering if a significant percentage of the accounts involved here are AI creations in the style of theory 2
3) Rufus is AI from a project about AI art
@@sourgreendolly7685That was 2.
3) Rufus is a troll
rufus is an ancient king who ruled a kingdom hundreds of years ago and he was stuck in a well until someone accidentally dropped their phone down to him and now he is stuck with his own AI servant who makes movies for him
the fact his pfp is also AI is killing me
teehee thank u for the like pinely
I like when Princess Jane dematerialized into thousands of microscopic locusts to strike fear into fellow kingdoms knowing their crop yield can be at absolutely obliterated at any moment. Rufus is truly a visionary
Unironically this comment shows why AI is so shit at creating “art”: it by nature can’t be original. It can’t make the same associations that we can or understand social/cultural cues in any meaningful way. It has trouble with metaphors and symbolism, in large part because it doesn’t have intention in mind. It can’t be funny in a human way.
Roundabout way of saying your comment was genius.
@@hopeboyherewithyourmcdonal3634 omg thank you for the nice comment Komaeda
@@hopeboyherewithyourmcdonal3634because it is? AI's main thing is that it's relies on our inputs, and sometimes those inputs are "lost in translation" so to speak hence all the uncanny bits about them, from disfigured hand and fingers, the super basic shading background, the uniformed skin tone, etc
princess jane is actually the manifestation of one of the ten plagues
@@hopeboyherewithyourmcdonal3634 nagito
"You did a good job typing that out" is now my favorite response to AI "creators."
I can’t stand when they’re like “I put so much work into this. I did so much tweaking to make it look like this” like ok? Still just a sentence😂😂
B-b-b-but I edited the photo to clean it up 😢 (it still looks fucked up)
"Your graphics card is SOOO talented omfgg!!1!!1!😍😍😘😚😍"
the artists that model was trained on did a really good job!
Just be careful not to go too far in the other direction and demonise all the hard workers who use AI as a part of their job. Even RUclipsrs use AI to clean up their audio, cut our dead air, animate certain parts etc. - despite all the hard work they do. Yet AI has become such a stigma now that any association gets criticised.
I refuse to believe this is genuine, this has to be satire. If Rufus isn't a troll account making shitty "AI" animations to make fun of AI Art culture then I don't know what is
Did someone make an AI generated twitter account with the prompt "annoying AI bro who wants to make movies with AI but doesn't seem to understand how films or AI actually work" ?
It‘s just Rufus87078959
@@mewling_mooncalfThat was my thought 😂 That's actually hilarious in that case.
@@sourgreendolly7685 if true this would actually improve my opinion of the effectiveness of AI 😂
I hate to be the guy to remind you of this, but remember Kwebbelkop?
Rufus is the kind of guy to say "I don't really see the point in music"
"Its just a bunch of noise"
and he starts it by saying “bah!” like a disgruntled tavern dweller listening in on nearby adventurers discussing legends of a buried treasure, thinking how absurd it is that some people would believe such puerile rumors
or the guy in the vine that claims he loves music but literally has no idea what it is
@@cheesebatto “Here comes the best part! ...Oh, it's over? Yeah, I know”
Very bizarre and weird thing to say
"I'd like to show you some tricks" *dies*
*turns into dust and reassembles self casually*
She is stuck in an infinite loop, disintegrating and reforming constantly. Her pain is immeasurable on each run through, but her consciousness is reset every time, leading her to experience the same unimaginable damage over and over and over, never stopping, being numbed by the repetition, but never being able to escape it. This being had no reason to exist, except _Rufus_ insisted upon her existence, to show her potential, but unknowingly showed their own disgusting power and influence on their awful “creations”.
*crowed cheers and applauds*
@@whyiwakeup6460That's both hilarious and a fun concept in the writing sense.
"mr stark, i don't feel so good"
Rufus' attempt at "recreating" the Tasmanian tiger is especially funny to me because you can see how much the AI wanted to take the tiger part as literally as it could (notice how the AI video has them with striped faces when in real life, they only have stripes on their back).
Also we literally have photos and footage of Tasmanian tigers (including full blown specimens and taxidermy mounts!), so getting AI to make its own recreations is just plain redundant.
the clip that's supposed to be of it running is so funny too like absolutely nothing is moving correctly
As a Tasmanian who grew up learning about the Tasmanian Tiger and seeing them in the museum, I noticed the exact same thing.
Yeah I thought it was a cool concept but realized that the animal looked too familiar 😆
I think it actually morphs into an actual tiger at one point too
When I saw that shit, all I could think was "Oh look, Ingen decided to do a collab with Happy Meat Farms."
(Also, something else that makes no sense: Why didn't Rufus simply type "thylacine" into the prompt instead to try to avoid the inevitable tiger confusion? XD)
Honestly I pity AI "artists". Many of them view art as a means to an end, unaware of how enjoyable and fun the process is. Living a life devoid of passion must be hard.
That, or they seem to have complete contempt for the mediums and expressions…
I pity them too. They want to be part of the creative process, they want their ideas to be realised, but they lack the confidence in their own skill and the patience to develope it.
Have you seen that tweet where an ai guy shows how much money he pays per month on ai image generators? It's around $300. Imagine paying that much to not learn how to draw
It is that’s like what depression is
@@joelle4226I've been life-threateningly depressed at times, but this?? This would be a new low.
@@fudgen.a1249 True, a lot of them actively hate artists and the mediums they work in. They _want_ ai put all artists out of a job. The idea makes them happy. How can you hate something so much while demanding more of it? It's like that one saying sex workers have, "they point with one hand and jerk it with the other."
Rufus is definitely an AI programmed to think he is a real man who is just really into AI and also has never seen human media
Why's she saying "Hello my name is princess jane" with the passive aggressive intonation of a primary school teacher trying to keep it together for the last couple hours of a schoolday?
Her trick is disintegration and people enjoy it. I kinda see how she'd feel that way 😂
i wanna sit down with rufus and attempt to have a conversation with him
[an attempt was made]
"Is Princess Jane in the room with us right now?"
“Hello, everyone, it is princess Jane.” *discombobulates*
He probably is not capable of human interactions
I'm convinced ai dudes don't actually understand what makes a movie a movie. they think as along as they have series of visuals haphazardly stitched together its not only a movie but a good movie. theres no themes, no character development, no symbolism, no PLOT. Something one my teachers told me that I think applies here is "A movie that is just something pretty to look at without any substance behind it is just a music video, and not even a good music video at that."
they don't seem to view art as anything more than "make pretty picture" so it makes sense they wouldn't understand what makes a movie a movie
It’s okay ChatGPT can write the plot for them 💀
They don’t even write their own things, but prompt these chat bots to do it instead
@@thebuilder5271deadass
They don't understand why people like art. Sometimes it's hard to believe there are actual people out there that have no idea why a movie or art is good, but they exist. What they are doing is basically like: they go to a restaurant, order 2 different plates of food, and when the food arrives, they mix the two food dishes together. Then call themselves a chef. They go around telling people how easy it is to become a chef and you don't have to actually learn how to cook to become a chef. But everyone else is giving them weird looks because all they did was mix a cake into a soup and made it uneatable.
I could never be a Rufus hater. This man is doing the (unintentionally?) funniest things I’ve ever seen anyone do with AI generation. It looks so absolutely awful and nightmarish and he’s so confident about it I can’t help but love him.
i do feel kind of sad for him with the amount of hatred he's getting when he also seems interested in trying to make his own things and like he's always wanted to but been afraid. i want him to get more encouragement to move in the right direction instead of just copying things
@@karak962he's not making his own things though.. 😂 He's typing
@@karak962 You sure got a lot of assumptions over someone who could very well be just another annoying cryptobro mf
Imagine some person saying "look what I made!" showing a shirt they bought on amazon, but to be fair they *did* type in the words to search for what they wanted and a shirt matching those words popped up
In an alternate universe where that would somehow make sense, I "made" a rug and room thermometer in the past week alone and both took less than a day 😂
A custom shirt is still way better then a entire "work of art", like a drawing or a full movie by AI
“Hey, Mario, look what I made!”
“It’s a stone Luigi, you didn’t make it”
Convinced Rufus parents bought him a viewfinder toy, and saved money by telling him that those are movies
I used to make videos like his pirate movie in windows movie maker in middle school, except with hot wolf people. I think I used my time better
Also much love to the community since Pinelys untimely murder
So based
Absolutely time well spent.
Shoe me some
certified welcome to the club anime wolves moment
If you didn't grow up obsessed with anime wolf people, did you even have a childhood?
the king's crown flopping around like jelly when he moved his head made me a tiny bit less worried about AI taking over the film industry, unless it was meant to be made out of melted gold
no but really AI "art" makes me sad and worried as someone in the industry. i'm lucky that my job (tattooing) is incredibly difficult if not impossible to replace with an AI, sure you could do the designs with it but not the actual tattooing process, but fuck i'm feeling scared on behalf of animators, screenwriters, concept artists etc
Thankfully there are some thing us humans have over AI. Our own experiences and visual library. Ability to go back and change aspects of our creative work; to fine out the details. Ability to experiment.
Ai doesn't "think" like that. Sure it might looks fine, in some aspects, but it will always be limited.
@@simonecesarlastname1852n Ai doesn't think at all tbh, as long as you're creative and your employer respects your craft you'll be fine. It isn't about if the ai is good but rather if companies try to take the easy way out.
seriously. i'm an artist and an aspiring animator, and all of this AI stuff really pisses me off. the AI has no personality and human attributes and completely rids the art of uniqueness. it pisses me off that people would prefer manufactured art over human art that actually has meaning.
with 2d animation, you can slow it down and see the different beats. animation isn't typically a fluid 12fps, it can be on 2s or 3s or even a mixture to help with motion. AI animation is a constant fluid 12fps, from what jve seen, and is way too clean. it just throws up the same anime artsyle or semi realistic artstyle. animation is such a brilliant form of art and it sucks to see people with no talent trying to fake their way to talent with AI.
sorry for the rant but i really needed to dump this somewhere that people would understand 👍 i agree with 100% of your comment and luckily a lot of people seem to share the opinion that AI art isnt actually art, it's just a loud few from what ive seen.
It might just be me, but it seems improvement has slowed down a little from a new mind blowing model releasing every week.
It'll probably just be like most technologies where it speeds up exponentially, then plateaus off, for more complex creations like in the film industry, i seriously doubt it'll replace humans.
Current 2D student and (hopefully) future animator and character designer here! I'm fucking TERRIFIED
i can't believe that laugh track in the first video wasn't clipped in LMAO
I thought it was an applaus
@@cuckoobrain7999It was very funny applause that got people to laugh so it's kinda a laugh track.
You're right, I just think I'm funny 😂 Don't mind me.
Bullying AI "artists" is one of my favorite pastimes
ai users are artists in the same way as subway employees
except subway employees actually do work
@@theMyRadiowasTakenNow that's just rude. Subway employees do a _wonderful_ job!
@@commandercorl1544 of course
but "artists" a stretch isnt it?
@@theMyRadiowasTaken The art of sandwiches is NOT to be understated!
@commandercorl1544 I used to work at subway during the summer a year ago. One particular day, a filthy, smelly-ass homeless dude came in to order, but before he left he shat in the bathroom and covered in head to toe in his crap. The toilet, the floor, the walls...the scent was indescribable. The worse thing to ever assault my nostrils. One of my coworkers had to take the next day off to deal with the trauma of cleaning it with me. Never, NEVER take food workers for granted.
my friends n I all got so obsessed with princess jane that we made our own sans undertale style princess jane au ocs. we didn’t want to use ai so we fucking photobashed them. we have an entire doc of lore at this point. thank you rufus from the bottom of my heart, the princess jane multiverse has been so fun to explore
What if Rufus was the real AI all along?
Or a 4chan troll who makes fun of AI!!
You know, its not just that they arent putting effort into this AI "art", its also that they seem to be amazed by the most generic images.
Yeah it’s so weird
It's because AI art is accessible to lots of people, many of them aren't actual artists. AI art is still intriguing to real artists. The MoMA has an AI-generated piece on display right now and it is brilliant, unlike anything I've ever seen before. When I was there, everyone was mouth agape staring at it.
@@lukeshioshioCavemen, the lot of you.
@@M50A1 nah, the people who actually go to the MoMA aren't cavemen. Nice try though
@@lukeshioshio What the fuck is the moma 💀
Maybe I’m paranoid, but rufus seems like a bunch of undisclosed ads. Like, between naming the programs being used and hyping them up it gave me the same vibe as undisclosed ads on TikTok
love the fact that he already posted an origin story for princess jane and u completely ignored it💀
Can you copy it here cause I don't want to go on twitter
We need to know the Princess Jane origin story!
Ah yes, first name bunch of numbers, always trustworthy
Agree
The issue to me is that people think that they can use AI to entirely replace the creative process rather than assist it. I could see some cool, intentional uses of AI to compliment man-made work, but 99% of the time you get people like rufus who suddenly think they're a filmmaker because they typed up a prompt and slapped some music and text over it. AI is not magic, and it will never fully be able to replace something a human made with intent.
Maybe it can in the next 100 years,who knows.
@@tadicahya6439it might be possible but i think we'd all rather not think about that
AI art is like watching an unholy marriage between a fever dream, sleep paralysis, and cutscenes from ads that never get to the product.
"I hope AI never gets better" - YES, exactly! The most compelling AI-generated media I've seen heavily leaned into all the jank and various inperfections of the technology. AI developers seek to minimize those inperfections but artists should be embracing them instead - consciously or otherwise
"Whatever you now find weird, ugly, uncomfortable and nasty about a new medium will surely become its signature. CD distortion, the jitteriness of digital video, the crap sound of 8-bit - all of these will be cherished and emulated as soon as they can be avoided. It’s the sound of failure: so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart. The distorted guitar sound is the sound of something too loud for the medium supposed to carry it. The blues singer with the cracked voice is the sound of an emotional cry too powerful for the throat that releases it. The excitement of grainy film, of bleached-out black and white, is the excitement of witnessing events too momentous for the medium assigned to record them."
Brian Eno, from "A Year With Swollen Appendices."
Artists wanna get rid of ai cuz they're mad there's something better that can replace them lmao
The art community is vile and toxic, I've had absoloutely horrible experiences with artists, they're psychotic scumbags who abuse and take advantage of others, they scam people, they harass people, I've been given death threats and even doxxed by artists, the art community is godawful.
Ai does none of that, you type in a sentence, you get what you want, ai doesnt harass you or spam you with death threats, ai doesn't abuse others, they aren't psychotic, they just..give you what you typed in, no drama, no hassle, unlike real artists lmao
@@tedtheodore5715 Have you ever considered that you might be the problem? As the saying goes, if everywhere you go smells like shit check your pants.
@@tedtheodore5715 You don't just type in a sentence and get what you want... You have to reconfigure and specilize your prompt about 10 times (plus just trying to see if the issue you're having is rare. The misconseption that AI is just type a sentence and get a pretty stolen picture is exactly what artists are shitting their pants about.
@@tedtheodore5715 cool, but two problems
Any community on earth will have those dudes that do that stuff
Comercial, religious, even random hobbies you have will have scammers and all that weird stuff
Also, ai is kinda unlikely to replace artists, because well, anything ai can do, we can do way better, one thing it that you kinda can't appreciate anything in it, other than it just looks very cool, not much hard work, maybe you could consider fixing the prompt 30 billion times the hard work
And oh yeah, ai needs human inputs to do it's job
So basically we just pressing a "free art" button but also expecting it to replace stuff like movies or animation itself
Conclusion: ai art is cool, could be used to make some interesting stuff if you can't do the stuff you're thinking, however it can't compete with us humans when it comes to this topic, it's all about creativity y'know. (like damn I know people said the same about other stuff in the past but I don't think industrialization is the same as drawing the Monalisa)
Anyway, 60 seconds pfp
AI has so much potential to make tedious and detail oriented work faster and more fun. It has a lot of potential to help artists and... people are using it for this?... AI is gonna be ruined by NFT bros isn't it...
Exactly like the ai tools in photoshop that have existed for years already is so helpful, hate to see crypto bros ruin yet another potentially useful invention
"Hey, could you come up with a smear frame between these two frames" could be so useful for solo animators trying to get good at doing smear frames by using a generated one as a reference on where to start. But no, crypto bros gotta ruin everything.
@@rambblerI think clip studio has had an ai unbetween animation system for a while now? I might be misremembering a lot of that but from what I remember it helps animate the inbetweens so the animators can animate with more detail.
Or maybe I imagined that fact in a fever dream??? I’m like 70% sure I’m remembering correctly
@@Aeiouaaaaaaaaa I don’t think it was CSP, but there were interpolation programs that did, and then everybody clowned on them.
@@ItsActuallyKatethey already are
What if its all a social experiment to make people realize how dumb it is to try to seriously use AI artistically
It's a valid tool though, it's great to use for concept art and stuff, the only thing I hate about AI art is the fact that people are calling themselves 'artists' for typing out a prompt.
@@LwieDevYeah. I will never call any pictures that an AI made “AI art.” To me it will always be an “AI generated image,” no matter how good it looks.
If I told any of these new AI people that AI has been around for a long time and it’s not a brand new concept, their heads would explode. AI is already in use in production sites, it’s been used as a tool in animation for forever.
The lo-fi "animation" makes me a bit sad to see
I sometimes tune into lo-fi radio streams, and while you're there for the music, it's nice to have some good visuals, usually just some art of someone studying or looking out over a balcony or wherever, good chill stuff
But I've noticed that there's been a lot more of these popping up with blatantly AI generated images for their visuals, very similarly to that mess that Evil Pinely shows off at around 8:36
It just becomes distracting, like, street lamps and posts melting, structures not looking right, objects on top of tables or desks just not looking as they should
There's no shortage of actual art or renders of places to use, some streams even use actual footage of real places (like Tokyo, New York, or Seoul), but such streams just... don't care, just generate a non-euclidean mess and call it a day
THANK YOU!! I've seen this too it's so creepy and uncanny but nobody else says anything about it. Maybe they do it so they dont have to credit any artist or photographers but man..
Sometimes I wonder if some of the songs themselves are ai too
Yeah absolutely! An AI program can't deliberately convey mood or composition, which is kind of important when you want to match the mood of the music and give your viewer's eyes something to explore. In the generated example in this video, the styles for the background, animated bits, and character "art" were all mismatched and incompatible, and the composition was a disaster. The only face on-screen tucked all the way to the edge of the shot, the other person just off-center, both figures so low down, the animated section being this strip that doesn't point the eyes anywhere specific. It's a trainwreck of an image
Princess Jane not only can disintegrate and reintegrate, but also jump cut and color correct reality itself. We stan an omnipotent queen
AI "artists" when they find out they have to type words onto a computer and wait around for an image for the day: 😢😡😤😢
Ai could be used super well for abstract dream sequences or otherworldly lovecraftian creatures or scenes with how bizarre and weird but recognizable the things it creates are in a way that can be hard for humans to replicate, but instead we get people trying to just replace humans with ai all together instead of working with ai to make cool things :(
Yeah and now using ai like that would undermine artists by legitimising the usage of ai (though obviously artists can still make dreamlike visuals)
honestly i think ai would work really well if you had a program that you had to draw it. like you need to make a few sketches of your own and you cant import any images so people cant steal other artists work, and after youre done sketching you put in a couple prompts and the ai will take what youve make and create some larger & more dreamlike images out of it
@@goldenmoleloverAI can't be trained on such little data but that's a cool idea
AI can be used by artists as inspiration in their art or ideas during creative blocks and it is used that way.
The currently popular use is so awful and has such terrifying implications that a lot of people throw the baby out with the bathwater. BUT it's not only that, there are artists starting discussions about having a more nuanced take. Hopefully that trend continues.
Doesn't solve the issues with its current popular use unfortunately but the nuance is being nurtured at least.
@@kamilululu2515 yeah unfortunately :,^) i feel like ai could have been used for stuff like webcomics though cuz the artist could feed it their work and the ai could help out with backgrounds and stuff to lessen the massive workload
Funny AI movie aside, it makes me happy to see you side with artists, the ones who spend years honing their craft with their own hands i mean ofc
I for one would love to see a full 130 minute movie delivered entirely by characters in mismatched art styles speaking directly to the camera while only moving their faces, and text over scenic shots.
Rufus is the ai version of those people who write fanfic about stuff they’ve never watched :’)
I think those are 2 wildly different things
@@bctc1085yeah
If this comment wasn't AI generated, I'd love to hear how you mean this OP.
Terrible comparision
At least fanfic writers care about their work and the fandoms...
i’m sorry but i can’t get over the fact that the princess is basically the lisa rinna m&m jiafei cupcakke meme, like there were already so many layers to that meme already😭
This reminds me of the guy who got exceptionally angry that my girlfriend didn't accept his 'gift' of an AI generated pfp, but instead kept the one I drew for her.
He blocked both of us and then apparently left the internet. Oops.
Think he is obsseed with ai art
@@studystudy3753 Yeah. He kept trying to win my friends over (we're a group of artists, btw) by sending them the same kind of AI crap. Like, gee, wonder why we wouldn't like it, huh?
I am very interested to see this man shit out the most generic and stilted fantasy movie of all time
AI somehow has worse visuals than my dreams
After witnesing the pure talent and genuis of Rufus I've officially decided to drop out of my animation course and give up my creative endeavors, for nothing I work on, nothing I bring into this world, could ever emulate a fraction of the pure talent emenating from his works. I once thought hard work was the way to go, that the years I've spent building up skills would one day pay off and be recognized by the world, alas, I have been humbled in the face of a true masterpiece. My hubris was my downfall, and I see now what a fool I was to waste my life in pursuit of something that was never mine to claim. Here, I lay down my pen, and step down as an 'artist' to let the true creators of the world take my place. Thank you, Rufus, for showing me the light, and for exposing the ruthless hypocrisy of my small-minded ways. I hope all 'artists' and 'animators' will follow soon, and retire to make way for the art of the future. Amen 🙏
the inflection on "my name is princess jane" is so uncanny
UUUUUUUGH, right!? "Hello my name is Princess Jaaaaane?"
The best use of the kind of AI "style" where everything is kind of uncanny and fluid is the music video for *Iron Lung by King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard.*
I think it's basically different artworks that match the music, but AI has interpolated between them. It's a very psychedelic, slightly unnerving song, so it actually works really well.
I genuinely miss older AI art where the weird psychedelic stuff was what you got 90% of the time, it's something that a real artist could never truly recreate... These days they just try to replicate something that already exists, unless you purposefully try to break it, or do something it's not perfected yet, like videos!
Have you seen the music video of Atropos by Periphery? It's used to give off this apocalyptic feeling of how technology is distracting us while the world around us is being destroyed. Like the A.I. layer of reality is smothering the humanity beneath it.
Madeline is cool too. By Kiki Rockwell
@@lovesick_loser AI still is mostly useful for weird psychedelic stuff, it's absolutely fucking terrible at making anything that makes sense. I've played around with it a few times out of curiosity and its a pain in the ass to try and wrangle the ai into making something that makes sense. You could give an elephant a paintbrush and get it to paint something better than what most ai can do.
Rufus made a robot dance he's gonna be so shocked when he learns about MMD
I remember the thing about priate ships how they would shapeshift into a different ship every single time you see them
Why does this feel like something Danny would do but also something Danny wouldn't do
When I watched the video where the princess did her magic trick, I cheered, until she reappeared. Then my heart shattered into bits
I want lo-fi pirates so badly, that's such a brilliant concept
There's probably an album like that,there's lo fi with anything
"well this goes against some things i believe in"
this is so unreasonably funny to me thank u pinely. im gonna start saying this about virtually everything i encounter and im so excited. 😌
Thank you soooo much for using your platform to call out AI "artists!" It's times like this that make me cherish the artists look up to even more. Think of everything Richard Williams has done in his career as an animator and then watch any of these... It really makes you appreciate the work people put into their passion. If thylacines had actually looked like that in real life, then no wonder they'd gone extinct... creatures of nightmares...
with love, a small starving artist who hates this AI garbage and loves animation
its genuinely a shame that people like rufus are the reason creators like Austin McConnell get so much shit for trying to use AI as any part of their creative process, even if its to make certain aspects of art more accessible to people (all while those people who give them shit ignore all the ways they & their fav creators already use AI in a million little ways). The only relief/ humor i get out of this is that at least these people can't copyright their "creations" because as long as it was mostly made by a computer, that software or whatever is the legal "creator". so they dont really have a way to profit off of this shit bc people can just screenshot/record it & be completely within public domain while doing so.
edited for small corrections to my wording
I agree with you that AI art would be better if it stayed where it is and stopped trying to achieve realism. It’s always going to look off if you try to do what a human could do- it should instead be trying to do what a human _can’t._ Unfortunately, the people who make these AI don’t seem interested in that.
I once tried to see if I could get an AI image generator to make something surreal, like it was from a dream, since I couldn’t do it. I’m a bit too literal and struggle with making abstract stuff. The AI didn’t want to make what I wanted and kept trying to make realistic stuff- it looked off, but not in a surreal, dream-like manner. It just looked _bad._ So the AI was useless for both normal and surreal stuff, which is a shame. It could be used to make some neat things.
Am I the only one creeped out by most AI art? Something just feels wrong and weird whenever I look at it =/
You're not the only one.
It seems to be a product of how these AI algorithms handle data. They use tensors, which seem to produce these goop like artifacts. The algos have to condense a lot of data from the training data to pass the training process, so a lot of data compression is involved.
Similar to how jpegs produce a lot of blocky shapes (a result of how data is compressed, what data is prioritized, and what data is lost,) because they deal with vectors, the AI produces visual artifacts that have a goop like effect.
And its really gross looking.
It makes me feel... itchy when I see it, depending on what it is. Like there's bugs crawling in my hair and deep under my skin, and I feel the need to scratch them off.
Lately, as more has cropped up, I've grown somewhat more resilient to the feeling, but it is still strong. AI art, especially in video form, looks... strange.
You know the modern horror thing about creatures that mimic humans,but end up looking uncanny
Like Fake Peppino,skinwalkers and monsters from Mandela Catalogue
Ai does the same thing to art
Rufus isn’t an AI or a troll or real person.
He’s just a figment of all our imagination and if we realize this then he can’t harm our minds anymore.
the only thing this guy has ever heard about movies is the phrase "motion picture"
“I would like to show you some tricks, I hope you enjoy it.” Is way too funny to not be satire
5:59 "I hope AI doesnt get better" well that aged well... in just 5 months...
I’m convinced Rufus is a troll, how could someone be so un-self aware 😭
Bro the “I would like to show you some tricks” clip made me bust out laughing
I’ve heard stories about people taking art classes and submitting Ai art as their assignment 🤦
Maybe if he spent more than 5m in these AI generations it wouldn't be as bad, nor would it be so funny, so please keep it up thats hilarious
Also the fact that these people talk about LLM and the current AI image/video generators like its magic and equivalent to a mind/creativity will never get old. How can you shout that nuch about how something is "the future" yet don't know/Undertale how it even works.....
UNDERTALE HOW IT WORKS
UNDERTALE??? FUNNY SKELETON GAME???
Gods bless autocorrect 😂
but dw, I still Undertale what you were saying completely
Fart smellas: understand
Smart fellas: Undertale
@@sourgreendolly7685 honest to God I won't even edit it because the autocorrect made it funnier
12:49 "One of my finest AI creation." Bro, the guy's left hand has 6 fingers.
The thing that fascinates me about AI wanna-be artists is that I get the appeal. I understand having all this images in one head and wanting them out but having no art skills and no time or energy or just interest in learning them.
The difference was that when trying to draw started being frustrating because I'm impacient and have bad fine motor skill (I can't cut papper for life) I just decided to write. And it fitted. It was just a skill I found more joy learning and worked better for me personaly while helping me still put my characthers and ideas out just in a different way. I have no ilusions over being a good writer or even a published one but I like to write. It makes me happy to create scenarios and very few things are better or even equal than the satisfaction over finding the right word, of uncovering ever characther speak pattern and how they relate to the way they think abd their background, of just suddently knowing what happens next after days without a clue.
And that's not me saying that AI wanna-be artists should write (they are already just using ChatGPT) but that both creating and putting genuine effort into things is a central part of the creative process and that there's likely a different way to express one's creativity that while they aren't necessarialy naturally talented at, they will find enjoyable to learn and partake and will be way better than typing. And so while they are awfull (and treat artists like crap) is almost sad they will never enjoy creating at all. Never actually like art.
P.S: also based on the amount some of this people waste on AI crap just comission an artist. It might take longer and be a bit more expensive than AI but the results are waaaay better. It is just objective prettier but also and more important for me there is a satisfacion in knowing that someone actually made a real effort and time and actual work into that cool idea that exists in your head (in other words pay your artists!!).
P.S. 2: sry for any grammatical erros english is not my first language and sometimes I end up mixing things.
On the bright side, the use of A.I. has pretty much been banned in filmmaking
If that princess video supposed to be funny, then the future of randomly generated meme is bright
the way the jane character sounds like she's about to cry when she says "i hope you enjoy it"
The temptation to take that joke synopsis of the Fairy Saga and actually make a proper story out of it is strong
"Look at how well I typed this sentence"
On the topic of the "Soapy" Quality of AI images; I watched a video recently from a graphic designer, who pointed out ways to spot AI images now that they're getting more convincing. He showed how the different colour channels in the image have the exact same noise pattern. A real photograph with have different grainy patterns in each channel.
The video is called "How to spot generative AI (Even if it has all 10 fingers and toes)" by Trancor, he explains it a lot better than I could!
There’s no way that the Rufus icon is a real person. It’s gotta be an AI guy as well
Or a troll making fun of AI, either way still funny af!!
that dancing robot was perhaps the funniest thing i’ve seen this month
I have a feeling Rufus isn't even real either. He's just an A.I. himself.
When Princess Jane pulled of the "Mr. Stark, I don't feel so good" dance, I immediately knew AI was the future
rufus uses "movie" the same way your highschool biology teacher does before she shows you a 30 second youtube clip demonstrating mitosis
i kind of wish the princess jane video was just some kind of surrealist comedy art animation piece like pilotredsun's work, because it would be infinitely funnier
Rufus comes off like an AI generated human being
Crazy how fast AI has been coming into the zeitgeist.
But how do we know that this video wasn't ai generated 🤨?
because it isn't shit
Well, we know Pinely has an actual hand with functional fingers, and not a tumor growth with tiny appendages slowly being consumed by said malignant growth.
Oh, and he blinks.
He breathes.
remember, bullying ai “artists” is always morally correct
They're not Artists, They're just Ai Guys, Ai people
How has an artist or you learned to draw a dragon?
No artist has seen a live dragon or taken their own reference photo of one-because dragons are not real. (Sorry for this disappointing newsflash.) Unless someone has managed to go their entire life only reading descriptions of dragons, their understanding and mental picture of dragons has been informed by countless previous depictions. Unlike cats, apples, or any other real-world thing, there's no way any artist arrived at their knowledge of dragons purely through lived experience. So if someone commissions an artist to create an image of a dragon, would the artist request permission from and/or compensate the creator of every dragon they'd ever seen? Obviously not.
Similarly, there's no way a human can view the Milky Way in its entirety from afar; so our concept of how the Milky Way looks therefore draws entirely upon the creations of others and images of other galaxies. (Big cheers to the first artist who ever had to create a rendering of our galaxy.) And the same goes for any number of things no human has ever actually laid eyes on: vampires, black holes, Santa Claus, Sauron.
All of this is essentially a recapitulation a broader point that's been made many times before: It would be disastrous to restrict artists to depicting only things they've seen in real life and/or which they have compensated/credited another creator for. I think most people can grasp this intellectually. But in the end, and as it nearly always does, the opposition is actually rooted in a perceived threat-and an economic one at that, since AI models are not ripping pencils and paint brushes out of anybody's hands.
@@UserName-zb8ql except when AIs are Tracing Art from Real Artists, with their Signatures and all
@@UserName-zb8ql btw, Are you a Bot pr Something? Why Dont you have a Username? Or at least a Real Username that is not a Lame Ass "@UserName-zb8ql" lmfao
@@Is-wunny the fact is it doesn't know what a Signature is. actually it adds them because all good art it has in its dataset has them
This man saw power points presentation and was at awe at the "movie"
I'm hoping this guy is pretending to be serious to show us how AI just can't replace humans
I think AI will be a great tool for our jobs. But fully replacing jobs, especially creative ones? Doubtful.
Rufus has spent too much time with AI and now he has become one
The dancing 3d model clip is uncannily similar to the Fsky animations in the *horror* arg Interloper, which I reiterate is a *horror* series
The pirate one looks like it'd be the start of a video i'd make for highschool english class
"Pirate Movie" more like Documentary of Pirate Ships in their Natural Habitat
What a plot twist it would be if Rufus was also an AI account.
The tasmanian Tiger one is so hilarious, incorrect stripes and the dislocated jaw lol
dont let this rufus dude discover power point
This was so bad, that i prefer to listen to things like "Well, that just happened" or "Somehow, Palpatine came back"
it is morally correct to bully these people
The only good use I've seen of AI generated images is when somebody used it just for flavor in a wholly original story and video series, and it was used to be intentionally uncomfortable and uncanny.
Questionable Movie?
SaberSpark has entered the chat👀
What if Rufus was an AI creating an AI all along?!