Great review! I understand Deutsch well, but I am not good at writing it, so I comment in English. I do however not agree on the need for Vorspannung/camber. I got interested in Ogso skis just because they build skis without camber. If I want a camber-rocker-ski, I have 100 others to choose from. The lack of camber is what makes the skis special. The shape and rocker work great for all-round use in my opinion, but the carbon construction don´t. I just tried the Spencer, which is the same shape as the Corbets, but in a heavier glass fiber construction. It skis perfectly fine even on harder groomers and felt stable and powerful in tracked out snow. There are so many skis with camber nowadays so I find it extremely nice to have the option of no camber in the Ogso Super Rocker lineup. The full rocker shape really shines in difficult snow and it can even rail carving turns on hard snow as long as the ski is built in a construction that can handle it. The reason that the Corbets doesn´t work that good for all-round use is not the lack of vorspannung, but rather the ultra light 1500 gram carbon construction in my opinion. Try a few runs with the Spencer, and I can assure you that you change your opinion about the full rocker "problem". Jedenfalls, great video!
Thank you for your comment. Have you actually compared the Corbet with the Spencer and did you then came to the conclusion that the fibreglass ski is better on hard grommers or did you simply test the Spencer and found that it works well on hard snow (which is of course also interesting, but of course the comparison would be even more interesting)?
@@Kleeblatt2304 I tested both the Cotbets and the Spencer the same day. It was in the Alps on a day after powder day so a bit tracked out, but still ok with untouched sections. I also skied quite a lot of groomers in the afternoon with both models. It is really a HUGE difference, like night and day. I thought the Spencer was a little bit heavy for my taste, especially in the tips and tails. Felt like abs tips and those are heavy compared to the more commonly used Koroyd and similar materials.
Here's a clip from the test (in Swedish, but still). No shots of the Spencer, but it was the same kind of skiing with both skis. ruclips.net/video/edfXd_qtRZ4/видео.html
@@martinottosson6583 Thank your for taking the time to answer and your clear statement. I will now go for the heavier model, since I want to use it as an All Mountain Ski. Thank you also for the video - which by the way is fantastic.
Great review! I understand Deutsch well, but I am not good at writing it, so I comment in English. I do however not agree on the need for Vorspannung/camber. I got interested in Ogso skis just because they build skis without camber. If I want a camber-rocker-ski, I have 100 others to choose from. The lack of camber is what makes the skis special. The shape and rocker work great for all-round use in my opinion, but the carbon construction don´t. I just tried the Spencer, which is the same shape as the Corbets, but in a heavier glass fiber construction. It skis perfectly fine even on harder groomers and felt stable and powerful in tracked out snow. There are so many skis with camber nowadays so I find it extremely nice to have the option of no camber in the Ogso Super Rocker lineup. The full rocker shape really shines in difficult snow and it can even rail carving turns on hard snow as long as the ski is built in a construction that can handle it. The reason that the Corbets doesn´t work that good for all-round use is not the lack of vorspannung, but rather the ultra light 1500 gram carbon construction in my opinion. Try a few runs with the Spencer, and I can assure you that you change your opinion about the full rocker "problem".
Jedenfalls, great video!
Thank you for your comment. Have you actually compared the Corbet with the Spencer and did you then came to the conclusion that the fibreglass ski is better on hard grommers or did you simply test the Spencer and found that it works well on hard snow (which is of course also interesting, but of course the comparison would be even more interesting)?
@@Kleeblatt2304 I tested both the Cotbets and the Spencer the same day. It was in the Alps on a day after powder day so a bit tracked out, but still ok with untouched sections. I also skied quite a lot of groomers in the afternoon with both models. It is really a HUGE difference, like night and day. I thought the Spencer was a little bit heavy for my taste, especially in the tips and tails. Felt like abs tips and those are heavy compared to the more commonly used Koroyd and similar materials.
Here's a clip from the test (in Swedish, but still). No shots of the Spencer, but it was the same kind of skiing with both skis.
ruclips.net/video/edfXd_qtRZ4/видео.html
@@martinottosson6583 Thank your for taking the time to answer and your clear statement. I will now go for the heavier model, since I want to use it as an All Mountain Ski. Thank you also for the video - which by the way is fantastic.
Wann kommen wieder Fahrrad Videos
sobald der Schnee soweit weg ist das ich mein Bike wieder raus hole :) also ich denke so in ca. 2 Wochen.
Wie viel kosten die Latten?🤔😅
650