A lot about having great conversations is if both parties can listen to understand. This began so well and then the host made it painful to listen. Tony was an awesome guest nevertheless.
Its okay for a moderator to be assertive and argumentative, but it has to balanced and controlled when you have a guest. At some point this was so painful to listen to especially the moderators arguments. But thats the world we live in. We all different. But you can prepare better and argue better regardless of the fact the structure of the interview is a conversation.
Mr Natif is not your average mind, you had to have approached this conversations with tact and cohesion. I feel like this episode was all over the place, you began really well but something switched and it suddenly became cloudy, the points were not landing, book titles and historical figures were being mentioned, yet, the philosophy was not being used contextually. I think having such a platform and admitting to not reading history is where the challenge begins, you have to plainly argue from factual data. The very same logic of using technology to alleviate human struggle is the same logic you have to use when discussing qualitatively. As a storyteller, there was too much that was said and too little that was understood, there is power in listening fully without agreeing to disagree, after all, it is an interview, and we want to hear the interviewees' points of view.
Thank you for your feedback. It is noted and we shall trying to make your experience better in the future episodes. You should think of these podcasts more as conversations than interviews in order to get the best out of them. The goal of the podcast is to paint a portrait of the guest through conversation. We believe there is more to conversation than reciting facts but that also tension, awkwardness and body language all add to it's authenticity.
The host seems to contradict himself a lot with what partly seem like teenage fantasies. His deliberate & continuous mispronunciation of ‘Anita’ under the guise of not caring about parliament & his non-contextual obsession with BTC is all quite telling!! Also, for an apparent anarchist, he doesn’t seem to fully appreciate the context of what he’s talking about for the most part. Good he admits to the same though!! Tony is spot on throughout!!
Big bro natif is very chilled 😅 wealth vibes
Many thanks Natiff many lessons learnt here
We apologise for the sound hiccup 0:23 to 0:49. We had technical difficulties while recording the podcast.
A lot about having great conversations is if both parties can listen to understand. This began so well and then the host made it painful to listen. Tony was an awesome guest nevertheless.
Its okay for a moderator to be assertive and argumentative, but it has to balanced and controlled when you have a guest. At some point this was so painful to listen to especially the moderators arguments. But thats the world we live in. We all different. But you can prepare better and argue better regardless of the fact the structure of the interview is a conversation.
Mr Natif is not your average mind, you had to have approached this conversations with tact and cohesion. I feel like this episode was all over the place, you began really well but something switched and it suddenly became cloudy, the points were not landing, book titles and historical figures were being mentioned, yet, the philosophy was not being used contextually. I think having such a platform and admitting to not reading history is where the challenge begins, you have to plainly argue from factual data. The very same logic of using technology to alleviate human struggle is the same logic you have to use when discussing qualitatively. As a storyteller, there was too much that was said and too little that was understood, there is power in listening fully without agreeing to disagree, after all, it is an interview, and we want to hear the interviewees' points of view.
Thank you for your feedback. It is noted and we shall trying to make your experience better in the future episodes. You should think of these podcasts more as conversations than interviews in order to get the best out of them. The goal of the podcast is to paint a portrait of the guest through conversation. We believe there is more to conversation than reciting facts but that also tension, awkwardness and body language all add to it's authenticity.
The host seems to contradict himself a lot with what partly seem like teenage fantasies.
His deliberate & continuous mispronunciation of ‘Anita’ under the guise of not caring about parliament & his non-contextual obsession with BTC is all quite telling!!
Also, for an apparent anarchist, he doesn’t seem to fully appreciate the context of what he’s talking about for the most part.
Good he admits to the same though!! Tony is spot on throughout!!