Russia is Running Out of EVERYTHING (Planes, Ships, Soldiers, Tanks...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 июн 2024
- Explore the complexities of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and its global impact! 🌍🚀 From initial blitzkrieg plans to a prolonged war of attrition, uncover the evolving military strategies and geopolitical implications. Delve into Russia's challenges with tanks, troop morale, and navigating international sanctions. Stay informed with our comprehensive analysis! 🎥
🔍 #RussiaUkraineConflict #WarAnalysis #MilitaryStrategy #Geopolitics #InternationalRelations #SanctionsImpact #MilitaryMorale #RussiaMilitary #UkraineWar #Tanks #TroopMorale #GlobalConflict #WorldNews #CurrentAffairs #MilitaryTech #GeopoliticalAnalysis #WarOfAttrition #RussianInvasion #GlobalImpact #PoliticalAnalysis #MilitaryDynamics #InternationalConflict #SecurityAnalysis #DefenseStrategy #themilitaryshow
SOURCES: pastebin.com/T0rdwMSW 
Наука
Remember when they said Russia was running out of artillery shells two years ago?
They did, that's why they have to focus their production on them now (while transitioning to a war economy as well).
They were. That’s why they had to start buying artillery shells from North Korea and augmented their artillery with the use of glide bombs.
Yeah I don't buy this video's premise. Russia has a lot more resources than they are mobilizing.
Then they said Russia's economy is going down.
Remember when "alternative voices" said that Ukraine has two months left, tops, over 18 months ago now?
- Russia is about to collapse !
- Ukraine is about to collapse !
- Russia is about to collapse !
...
Etc, for 2 years now.
No BS 😂
Fr, like I'm pro-Ukraine but this "Russia is done for, Putin will lose" copium is crazy. I still watch it anyways though 😅
😂😂omg Russia doesn't exist in the map!
But originally it was supposed to last 2 days 🤔
KIEV IN 3 DAYS
Loseing the old tanks while replaced with less but better tanks
My mans playing HOI4
This video gets less convincing the longer you listen to it
Orcs rolling into battle on golf carts sounds legit to me.
Yeah... As much as I want for it to be true, math just doesn't add up. Even with the losses they would be able to sustain sending tanks for 10 years (negative 1k per year but they have 10k operational in total). Saying that tanks could potentially run out for Russia by 2032-2034 is of little importance and doesn't look positive for the world at all. 10 years is a long fucking time.
This channel has been predicting Russia's demise for two years
Rightly
Yep! Propoganda just keeps spewing the same BS until they can no longer gaslight. That's how it works.
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! The sky is falling! 😂
Well, Russia isn't doing anything to disprove the predictions.
There are just as many or more channels predicting Russia's victory, whatever they think that looks like.
I'm not a fan of Russia, but this video sounds like some AI generated bullshit.
In terms of a ship, the word scuttle means one side voluntarily sinking one of their own ships. If it's struck and sunk by the enemy, it was not scuttled.
Lol Russky, your Black Sea fleet is down
@@borghorsa1902 The USA lost nearly 500 ships and 500 naval landing craft and support ships during WW2. Even winners lose some during war, it's the nature of war. Cope.
@@-Zevin- the only people who need to cope is your russian bots
This is bs anyone paying attention can see it.
The video quotes sources. Other sources confirm those findings as well. Or go watch Covert Cabal, who actually buys satellite images of Russian tank storages and counts tanks.
Russian equipment is shrinking fast.
…….don’t underestimate those 70 year old soldiers…..them boys been through some s**t and are built different.
yeah... they are vodka-powered terminators😎
At least Russia is almost out of Iranian drones. So it is getting quieter on western front
Wtf are you talking about with T-60's in stock and attacking (North) Macedonia? Did you mean T-62's and Moldova? Absolute nonsense.
Poor editing, poor research, poor everything.
the t-60 is a tank that russia used in the 40's and is using in ukraine, the image is a t-60. macedonia on the other hand....
@@AlexAnteroLammikko No, you just don't like what you're hearing, and you're too lazy to bother finding out if there's any merit to what's being said.
In 2024 if all you have is T60s, you have no real tank stock.
Making a small mistake doesn't mean that the rest is not correct.... Don't behave like a bean counter in a whinerly mode....
Macedonia? What kind of weird example was that? Or did you mean Moldova?
I had to turn subtitles on to make sure I heard it correctly. 😂
Lol, it was original, I’ll give them that
Yeah i guess he meant Moldova. Btw, if you like to learn new things, Macedonia technically doesnt exist anymore (since 2019). Its now called North Macedonia and is also part of NATO
That was so random.
Let alone there is no such country. There is one called "North Macedonia" though.
I'm not sure how not having enough tanks is related to using ATVs. People might ride on tanks but they are not troop transports.
I also don't think anyone should undersell the threat of using ATVs as fast attack hit and run vehicles like many other nations have them for.
Don't forget about the tank crew. Those destroyed tanks often include destroyed tank crews.
They don't even know the basic geography. Macedonia. WTF
That's true about most of the western "experts". They learn everything they know from LSD. ;) And none of them "get it" that Russia would always lose every war at the beginning and then stand up and waste the opponent. They did it with Swedes, Poles, French, British, Germans, etc, etc. It is about the fact that in absence of war, idiots run the country who are in love with the West, want to be part of it, which is what makes Russia weak every time. War then allows smart people to gradually take over the show.
Yes, they think that Macedonia is next to China and North Korea is next to Greece, and even for Brussels it is a country.
If one is charitable: they may have meant Moldova.
This canal its joke hahahhaahhaa
@@samurajsabacki4247 "canal" is a waterway, this is a "channel" :)
running out of tanks is one thing, but more important is the loss of experienced tank crews
They're auto loaders so they're being converted into FPV-tanks. Cool story.
Дронам и Джавелину без разницы какой там будет танкист.
They have 3 million solders, 1 million in & around Ukraine, 1 million being trained & 1 million reserves at home. They aren't running out of anything.
@@atlantic3866the retreating Ukrainians care
😂😂 Russia experienced .... that's best joke I have seen yet... Sad Russia government use there soldiers for meat grinder and old ww2 tactics sad for the people of Russia
The longest three days special Operation in history
as long as they hold 14 trillions dolars worth of resources it can last any days they wish. Ukraine has no ability to take that back.
USA were in Afganistan and Iraq for 20 years, Russia had its small Syrian compane for two and a half years. What three days? Years, pleaZe 😁😁😁
USA has to transport across the ocean to reach the Middle East Ukraine is literally on Russia's borders. Also the U.S wasn't going for an invasion.
@@JT-yl9yt Ukraine WAS bigger than France. Kiev had 600000 troops with hundreads of tanks, jets, helicopters and artillery😎
It's not Afganistan or Iraq. Besides, Ukrainians had Soviet army traditions and officers' academic education.
To be honest, Ukraine has the biggest and strongest army under NATO's command. The Western armies are small, weak and woke 🤓
@@Infopirates you are severely misinformed if you think Ukraine has the strongest army under NATO's command....massive delusion at its finest. 600k troop isn't the number you think its is for an army.
”Macedonia” while showing an aerial photo of the capital Skopje. How are they supposed to get there and why? Its NATO.
Funny one for shure. Where did he found Macedonia ??? But you know the western narrative - Ukraine is just first in country.
Guessing Moldova was the intended word…
@@DrMarjanTerceljim curious as well..
Old as 60 yo for reserves
United States has a stockpile of M-1 tanks in Northern California but pulling them out for active service isn't as easy as it sounds. I've seen several photos of the Russian tanks in storage, they have been exposed to some very sever climate over decades.
There are rows upon rows of US tanks sitting in climate controlled warehouses throughout the World.
Russia only need it to move, have SOME turret movement and be able to throw at least one shell. Those rusty tanks are "perfectly fit for the Ukrainian front"
@@wizz1358Ruzzian Seal Of approval xD
@@user-yq8qw9yg6e
"does it move?"
"da!"
"to the frontlines with you"
And I promise Russia did Zero preventive maintenance on any of them
The effects of the desertions aren't clarified enough. One thing that isn't pointed out is that deserters usually are the more intelligent and educated soldiers, exactly the ones Russia can least afford to lose. Similarly for (potential) conscripts leaving the country before entering military service.
Meanwhile, Ukraine has about 100.000 (!) deserters of its own within its borders at present, according to Kiev. Soldiers who refused to return to the front after being lightly wounded and simply vanished. Not sure why you believe deserters tend to be the more intelligent and educated soldiers though, at least not when it comes to the men on the frontlines.
Imagine being drafted as crew for a tank in Russia.
Some of this is true, but be careful that you don't underestimate your adversary. That is a mistake in war
Putin is desperate now,Even ukraine can hold on for much longer it will cripple Russia that's why he is offering a cease fire
True! I mean a lot of analysts have been saying that Russia is right about to run out of x thing for over a year now
This is exactly what Putin has made: underestimating Ukraine and the alliance
😂 which means trying to reboot more tank from north Korea 😂😂😂
I think everybody understands that Russia has to lose another million of their men before Putin thinks of stopping. Sure that modern people think that is a bit too much especially to the beleaguered Ukrainians but that is a sacrifice that Putin is willing to make.
absolutely amazing that someone can be losing so consistently, for so long, without ever actually losing....
They try to invade Ukraine, they planned to invade withon a week, for years now and are still far away from kiev and lose hundreds of soldiers every day lol. Would you call that winning?
@@jp57604first off the U.S is winning while Ukraine is losing
@@Gene2tek Ukraine has lost initially, now they are holding their own...of course...NATO's help is crucial... US and other NATO members are supporting Ukraine...the analogy would be...in WWII US, and others were helping the Europe...In your opinion, should have US stayed out of European conflict so they wouldn't be seen as benefacting from that war.? War supplies, weapons are not cheap. How many billions of dollars of donations would you expect US should just give away? Yes, their Defence budget is well above $ 8 billions a year, but they are also trying not to deplete their own reserves so they do not harm their own defence capabilities. And, yes, they get to measure Russian military capabilities, and test their own weapons, without direct confrontation with potential enemy. would you do it differently? They are not the one to start the war. Russian did. if Russia didn't invade, none of this would be happening. If Ukraine has chosen not to resist, also, this would not be now. NATO is not forcing Ukraine to fight, Ukraine is fighting for it's own survival, it's their own country being attacked. And most of the former Warsaw Pact member countries have direct experience with Russian control so they fight against possibility of Russian control returning. Nobody wants war in Europe, but Russia started one and now there's a question of finishing it as quickly as possible. Russian proposal for ending the war is lopsided. They absorbed some 20% of Ukraine and they want to keep it. Ukraine says NO. Would you stop fighting if the thughs invaded your home and took 2 bedrooms? Russia invaded the country for which signed a treaty for protecting it's sovereignty. Just because Ukraine wanted better ties to EU was not a threat to Russia. Russia was invited to become an observing member of NATO, and they declined. So If, at any point Ukraine decides to stop fighting, NATO, or US has no skin in the game. Let Russia absorb Ukraine and the conflict is over. Or, is it? Russia annexed Crimea and some other parts of Ukraine because the Ukraine decided to turn more towards the Europe. And NATO didn't do much. So Putin saw NATO response and decided to take the rest of Ukraine, since the sanctions did not hurt all that much, if at all. This is why most of Europe doesn't believe, Putin will stop if he gets Ukraine.
@@zlatkozivkovic8694 SPOT ON
Seems unbelievable or there is a bigger plan
This war has almost nothing to do with planes, ships, or tanks. And Russia certainly isn't running out of soldiers. Talk about artillery, drones, and missiles.
But in who’s getting more support I mean, Ukraine has the whole native on his side while Russia has China. That’s sending him paper tanks.
Are you involved in it ? First-hand information?
Bs
These Westie channels are winning financially.
Especially drones; this is Drone War I and Drone War II will be completely decentralized and national governments will fall to 'anarchy'
According to Estonian defense minister, Russia is out producing artillery ammo 7x USA and EU produces
Russia is at war, nato isn't
Russia is on a war time economy everything produced is for Putins war machine.
Isolated and hated Russia can't survive for long.
And they need it because russian artillery sucks compare to western artillery shells.
ruzzia has to import them from another dictator.. Kim Il.
Sadly they are so old that already cannon crews has been blown to pieces as the greades has blown the gun barrels to pieces.
True, but they're also using 1000x as much each day, what is your point?
The "Russian Tank" shown at 9:02 is clearly an American M48 Patton with a big fat white star. If that's wrong, I can't imagine what else is wrong.
Patton is on postament and T-34 is running in the picture simultaneously. Don't know what author had in mind with this but don't see where he is wrong. Do you see?
@@expert69ableprobably an AI scripted video.
If only I haven't seen this headline for 1.5 years poping up every week
Jokes on you lol, Putin went hat in hand begging third world powers for weapons and support😂
It's misleading as Russia will not ever run out of weapons as they are always making more. However, the war continues, the volume and quality of their weapons system will continue to decline.
For real, Russia is both out of weapons AND about to take over all of Europe any second.
@@cedriceric9730you’re not lying, but the “Russia is falling” headline has been running for two years. I want it to be true. But I’ll believe it when I see it.
@@cedriceric9730 Russia is buying while Zelensky is begging. But nice try.
You better hope that they haven't run out of everything except nuclear weapons. For that would be the last thing they use.
More importantly than the massive loss of tanks and trying to replace them is replacing the crews. That's the major issue. You can build 500 a month, but if zero new experienced drivers, it doesn't matter.
Buying Chinese military ware, is a sign of desperation.
"Our drones always return home, usually with bombs still on board".
Why? It's better than begging like Zelensky does.
you aware the majority of the USA's military equipment/missile components come from China
@@sleepyjoe7843 Yeah you keep telling yourself that.
You can replace equipment, but one thing you can’t replace, is a human life.
Yes, and Ukraine is conscripting 60+ year old men to "fight." Remember, when you're 8000 miles away from this fight, you can choose to be on NEITHER SIDE.
Even if they are, Russia is still getting their backsides handed to them 😂 @@johnhonker437
Вот именно. Что же вам такого сделали жители Малороссии, что вы промыли им мозги и решили убить их об нас?
You have a point but, Ukrainian has a quarter of the population of Russia
You can have children
It’s stupid and insane for Russia to keep fighting. It’s the worst scenario for the Russia.
As many times as I played Risk, Russia was a huge "risk" every time... the landmass to troops ratio doesn't work.
Shades of "Ronald Reagan obligated the Soviet Union to increase its military spending to the limits of insupportability."
...which worked pretty well, as I recall.
@@WeimarAmerica Soviet Russia refused to allow any sort of modernization of its economy the way that China did. By the time Gorbachev enacted Perestroika, the oligarchs at the top had been robbing the country blind for decades. There was so little value left that it was too little, too late. Simple things that could have used all that military surplus hardware were simply not allowed.
for example, if you wanted to start a courier business or a package delivery service, you had better hope everything would fit on a motorbike or a passenger car or small van. Soviet Russia didn't allow the private ownership of larger trucks. They could have probably pulled thousands of old trucks out of military depots and started the Russian version of UPS, but instead, they sat in depots and rusted away. A few trickled out here and there as military aid but by the time Putin's Russia needed them to convoy into Ukraine, the trucks were barely running scrap with tires that hadn't been changed in 30 years.
I'm guessing there are a whole bunch of Ukrainian and Belarusian farmers who towed those dead Russian trucks away, repair them and will put them to use for the first time since 1992.
@@WeimarAmerica that's what he is saying... what's your point?
@@yootoober2009 He's basically just agreeing
The big thing was for Reagan to push SDI to protect us from nukes. Russia was building up to a first strike against the USA, once their projected percentages got high enough.
The SDI shield messed up their projections and their estimated survival rate kept dropping. USSR was desperate for Reagan to abandon SDI but he wouldn't budge. Gorby had to dump all kinds of money he didn't have to push his own version of SDI. It didn't work. The USA had all the money and all the tech.
It was costing the USSR about 35 billion dollars a year to maintain their presence in the Eastern Bloc. They pulled out of eastern Europe to save that money and put it into Russian SDI. The people of those countries saw the Russians leave and they overthrew their commie overlords. That was in 1989 when the Berlin Wall fell.
A couple years later and the entire Soviet Union collapsed. The newer Russian Federation is a pale shadow of the USSR.
Had Russia not been so horny to nuke the USA, Reagan's SDI wouldn't have mattered. Russia could have kept its presence in Eastern Europe and would still own Ukraine today.
The only reason they lost the Eastern Bloc and Ukraine is because they just don't want peace. They were hell-bent on war with the USA and were willing to burn their own house down to achieve that goal.
this is the tenth time the Russians have run out of everything. Good of you to remind them
10th time? Please provide your sources......
I mean that's kind of the point. If you weren't running out of things you wouldn't be pulling from your reserve.
@@andymoore9977 No need for source, next week you will hear from MSM for the 11th time.
@@robertedwards2959 Russia pulling from reserves for more than 2 years? No, they just outproduce entire west. One of the reasons Germany lost, could not outproduce Russia.
@@sleepyjoe7843 if that was the case why are they buying ammo from North Korea and equipment from China? Places known for high reliability.
I am not really sure about Russia losing the war, Ukraine is brave and fearless but i'm afraid they will eventually run out of personel..Russia is still an industrial giant and they always relied on strenght in numbers in both equipment and soldiers
Theyre already running out of personal, they take every man they can, thats why a lot of men leave the country to go to germany or some other nearby land
Interesting point about the Soviets in WWII. By the end of the war 40% of all their military truck transport, and 70% of the ones at the front line, were US built delivered by the Royal Navy.
Real history and available data confirms that Soviets produced more military equipment than all allies of Nazi Germany combined and even more than every ally of USSR. Even when we're comparing Soviets with USA - Soviets dominating in comparison. They outproduced USA and British empire. I bet that you took 70% out of your ass and made up a number. The support that was provided to Soviets was too little and mostly humanitarian early war and by the end of a war it was too much, but it was already too late as Soviets were pushing towards Berlin to finish it off. Some historians suggesting that the reason for increase of support when Soviets were already pushing to Berlin was to have leverage on USSR after war. That didn't worked out that well. But that's different story.
For example, out of 10,000+ of produced BM-9 and BM-13 about 1800 were build on a chassis of Studebaker US truck since 1943 to 1945 when Soviets were already dominating on a frontline. That's closer to 20% against your "40% and 70%" claim. There is no doubt that it was the best chassis for the weapon at a time. Because most of the time they were using chassis from tanks and other vehicles with tracks. This was the first known industrially manufactured MLRS in history. This MLRS system was invented and built by USSR to defeat Nazi Germany on a frontline. Eastern frontline is where Nazi Germany lost the majority of their army. Namely over 5,000,000 troops were lost on a frontline facing Soviets. Over 75% of entire army perished on the eastern front. Remember famous Tiger tank? There were only around 500 models built in total. 400 of them were on Eastern frontline. Only 60 or 80 of them were operational on Western frontline at a time and were never used in one region. Just so you know. That's funny when you remember how saying was on Western frontline "every tank on a frontline is a Tiger". When in reality there were not even 100s of those and in every region of frontline there were at best 10 models.
you are funny. Americans love making themselves sound like the best at everything.
@@MrZlocktar Soviets produced almost nothing in comparison to the USA, well known, indisputable
@@rrai1999 Yeah, just little things like the most produced rifle in history, the Mosin nagant, the most produced tank the T-34, the most produced military aircraft in human history to this very day the IL-2 Strurmovik, 1.6 million semi automatic SVT rifles, over 6 million PPSH submachine guns, out producing most of the western allies combined and the entire Axis combined in submachine guns. "almost nothing"
If you are able to read in wikipedia you will see US supplied 5% of money and materials, 6% of tanks and transport and 7% of aviation to USSR. And by tanks and aviation I mean cardboard boxes in comparison to Soviet or German equipment.
Shows you how much you don't know about the war in Ukraine. It's been going on for 8 years
We're not supposed to know about Victoria Nuland's Maidan coup and the Kiev (KEE-evv) regime bombing eastern UKRAINE. As in, Ukraine bombing Ukraine. No, we're only supposed to know this all started last year when the eeeeevillllll Russians, unprovoked, of course, just marched in and invaded the poor, innocent, angelic, freedom-lovoing democratic Ukronions, I mean (sorry, Vicky) Ukrainians.
2014 to date
Absolutely true
Yup , 99% of people dont even know that war started 3 years before Covid 19 :D
@@ufodude1000 I'm no mathematician, but isn't Feb 2014 to June 2024 over 10 years?🤔
Russia is FAR from running out of tanks!
Russia has lost 3000 tanks but can produce 500 annually.
So if their net annual loss will be 1000 tanks, (-1500+500=-1000).
14K - 3K = 11K. Losing 1000 tanks annually means Russia can continue to supply tanks at the current rate FOR 11 MORE YEARS!
And then they can still supply 500 tanks annually after that!
Russia is too worried about diversity and inclusion to be able to increase their military factory output. On wait... no, that's us.
I want to believe it, but I can't.
I served in the Russian army, in one of the "good" regiments and believe me, we barely got any actual training
And I never had any refreshment courses after leaving the army, despite the fact that many years have passed
An issue with personnel loses is that loss of trained and experienced soldiers. It is relatively easy to bring people to the Army but difficult and time consuming to train them for battle.
@Victor-lr2xr: Yes they just become cannon fodder
Right. Any machine or equipment is as good as people operating them. But Russia's elites don't give a fuck about their people. So sad.
A Chinese mercenary who served with the Russian military in Ukraine in a storm unit was one of three survivors. He mentioned Russian replacements were not trained enough and as a result died quickly.
As Russian military officials say, Russian women will give birth again. (Бабы ещё нарожают).
Storm and Nevsky units are prisoners, spent as cannon fodder.
Many Chinese Mercenaries fight for Ukraine said the were trained by NATO. Ukrainian & Chinese were trained how to retreat & surrender in case or Russian's assault. Their mission accomplished as many territories of Ukraine surrender to Russia 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
There was a video a couple weeks ago where the new troops were about to arrive in Ukraine. The commander told them all they would definitely die soon, but they will be remembered as heroes.
You have a 100% chance of dying soon. Welcome to Ukraine.
Yeah, Russia is losing around 1000 men a day.... they have a 2 day maximum expectancy. It's incredible many men they are losing bc of their attrition warfare tactics. I just wish it would stop, for everyone's sake.
Eventually self piloting AI weapons are going to make big armor obsolete.
If russia is struggling with Ukraine, imagine how ww3 will turn out
The question is not how many Tanks they have, but how many tank crews they have.
yes, this is something laymen or MSM don't ever cover. The importance of western tech is in there. Turret tossing soviet tanks aren't important because they're funny, they represent the loss of entire crews. Ww2 showed us how industrial nations can shit out vehicles if they really want to, but putting a 16 yo in a Panther tank was desperation. Getting an expert crew is harder than building a tank, experts always say.
But Russia is a long way from manpower shortages. They may need to have another mobilization but the bodies are there.
That being said, the demographics of Russia are completely screwed. The current 18-30 generation is tiny compared to the rest of the population and none of them are having children right now for obvious reasons.
@@Justsomeguyyuyu keep in mind that today Russia is supposed to be a developed country. The more developed the country, the less % is fit for service for various reasons. Another thing is the economy. Look at stats on Russian unemployment, it drastically fell in recent years. If this keeps going, they'll need to pull people from the economy more, hurting it and the state income. There's already like 250-300,000 unoccupied jobs in Russia.
I think both questions are valid. Russia has lots of tanks on PAPER, but it turned out due lack of maintenance and corruption and scavenging, plenty of these reserve vehicles are unusable. Russian tank reserve bases are huge scrapyards....
@@sztallone415 Russia using 50 year old tanks and golf carts and begging to one of the poorest countries in the world is desperation. Shitting out crappy tanks doesn't do much. They just get destroyed as Russia has proven by their newest tanks onot lasting 5 minutes.
Russia seemingly hasn’t gotten the message that warfare has changed dramatically. Especially when it comes to the use of tanks.
There are no tanks battles and Russia uses tanks to gain ground with anti-FPV drones "armor".
Ah yes.... You the keyboard strategist will tell them...
Its great that people nowadays cab spot, and call out fake news in a hurry...
I love getting my war information from a random RUclips channel.
"Once an airframe meets its end of airframe life, it becomes useless".
B52: "Hold my beer!"
The Buff is forever.
Warthog="hold my other beer"
Yes I don't think they become useless
I think it was a saying in the US airforce, fly a B52 and fly the plane your grandfather flew.
The naval aspect of this war has got to be the funniest part about it, for me.
Imagine losing naval superiority to a nation that doesn't even have a navy.
its not Russia vs Ukraine its Russia vs the west and if you cant see that you are obtuse, durr hurr hahaha ukraine winning on their own, no its nato vs Russia and it ends in death for us all because of how utterly blind you people are
Much of the effective Ukrainian naval weaponry is homegrown…
More than funny, this is the most interesting and worrying aspect of this war. Sea drones are a lot more effective than air and land ones, the threat of their presence can deny waters to more powerful navies. Imagine Houthis, Somali pirates, Malaysian pirates, China closing down Taiwan... international trade needs safe waters and drones are going to change that.
@@adairjanney7109Nato soldiers are eating doritos watching videos of dying Zeds and tanning at the beach. Cope-a-dope.
@@adairjanney7109Putin miscalculated a bit ... Expected to win fast or at least the west would tire of Ukraine before Russia does.
Oops 😂
2024 is not the two year point. It's the ten year point.
remember walking WITH LITTLE SELF DEFENSE?
The loss of the tanks is miniscule compared to the loss of, and need to replace, an entire tank crew. By NATO standards, tank crews usually go through an entire year of training on tanks before they're qualified. I would assume Russia is much shorter, but getting new, unexperienced crews quickly into new tanks coming off the assembly line is going to be a disaster. All this means is those new tanks entering Ukraine are going to be manned by even less experienced crewmen than the ones who were blown to bits in the older tanks earlier in the war.
what makes you believe crews are always in the tanks? Most tanks are destroyed long after they've been disabled.
@@sbelcl Unfortunately for Russia, "disabled" usually means all or most of the crew is already lost. The Soviet era tanks were made to be numerous, with crew safety being very low on the priority list, which is the opposite for Western tanks, which are designed to protect the crew.
I quickly looked at the videos on this channel and it has almost exactly the same video titles a year ago. So, they still did not run out of stuff after a year....
nooo, you don't get it... russia keeps running out of stuff all the time.... first they ran out of T14 armatas, then T90s, then T72, then T50s or whatever they are
Why are they buying ammo from North Korea. Because they are out
@@SlosIIyeah, any day now
@@Eto_Kusaydoesn’t need to be any day, we’re not in a rush… may as well be 2028, that’s good enough. Point is, at this rate it will happen…
@@SlosII nah. its the same video over and over again, all the while the ukraine has shrunk even further and now has an army of mostly senior citizens
Russia is sending 70 year old T55 tanks to the front, so it running out of equipment
Smart invidual you are ;)
Those are not frontline tanks. Russia still have a lot of 100mm surplus. Those are SPG's(Self Propelled Guns) and sometimes even kamikaze tanks. Just 1 tank deleted an entire Ukrainian trench because they wanted to destroy it and found it seconds later that tank was packed with 6 ton of explosive. Including 4 FAB-100 bombs
Pure numbers always underestimate the impact of low morale for an army attacking another country. Everything becomes less efficient and more expensive as morale drops. Worst of all, everything becomes less reliable.
yup, the vietnam war proved that very well.
Like american bradleys and abrams burning in ukraine? Say hows the moral or the nations giving weapons and paying for ukraines war? Seems the us has had enough.
@dotManiac Vietnam cong tactics effectively proved the use of ambushes, and surprise to put the enemy always on alert. The amount of energy used to constantly scan your surroundings and stress that an attack can come at any time, put troops in 1) constant state of anxiety and 2) always tired due to lack of sleep and wasting energy on scanning for an unseen enemy.
@@thehappybeard i mean yeah, the US troops were already unsure what they were exactly fighting for. The surprise attacks definitely didnt help towards an already low morale, hence why i mentioned the Vietnam war in the first place as the morale was the main reason the US lost.
@@dotManiac 2 milion russko-vietnamese orcs got pulverized
War has always been a battle of resources. Whoever runs out of stuff first, loses. And with modern tech, war has gotten way more expensive.
No; not always. Ask Vietnam, Afghanistan (twice) etc.
Isn't that the opposite? Drones are very cheap
@@ooloongjohnson4015
Yep. Half a dozen $5,000 drones can take out a $2,500,000 tank or 3 $750,000 infantry fighting vehicles or 40-odd troops and six golf carts.
It's a poor mans war that will wave through the globe.
@@q.e.d.9112 Was going to bring this up as well. And at one point, they had really improvise when U.S. Republicans blocked aide, and they found that a $300 Wal-Mart drone rigged with a simple release mechanism and a couple grenades were often just as effective as a single $250,000 javelin. Hatches are often left open for ventilation, which is a convenient entryway for a done carrying a couple grenades.
The first casualty of war is the truth
Have to make a mental note: no more Military Show; had enough of "miles."
Russia doesn't have homeless problem. Cold takes care of them.
They survive the cold since Vodka is human antifreeze
*Darkk*
lol can't argue there... but i bet there are fewer of them based on how many people that have died in the war too... i hate laughing at suffering, but when you help the bully.. i feel less sorry for you... judgemental, i know
@@coodudeman I'm pretty sure Russia forcefully conscripts its citizens by this point...
In mother russia you dont take care of people people take care of you
"Russia is Running Out of Everything" - Again?!
Yeah. After all they have been able to replace BMPs with golf carts.
Да, надо только еще вам пару недель потерпеть. А потом еще, еще и еще...
Пока все НАТО об нас не убьётся =)
Wasn't they fighting with shovels already? Seems to be doing well for them.
No they do constantly.
@@johnap1988 We're low on shovels at the moment , so we use rakes instead
Age of troops vs over all population......
Birthrate has been in a nose dive for 20 years
I am curious at what point we will see T-34's or KV-1's show up on the battlefield.
They showed up in Berlin 1945
The GRU agents assigned to shitpost on this channel are going to be up all night doing damage control lmao
You already know
I imagine they love videos like this. Keeps them off the front lines.
Lmao at them harping on Macedonia 😂
This video is damage control..
@@trentpeterson3495 Nah Ivan, comments like yours are the actual damage control around here.
It seems everything in Russia can easily be traced back to Soviet era. Even their food😂😅
It took me almost 30 mins to realize this video is narrated by an AI, no human being speaks like a zombie for so long.
Waiting to see a T-34 with ERA and other modern equipment.
Let me know when my Vodka supply will be cut off, so I can stock up in advance.
Good thing other people make better vodka. Tito's for example is made in Texas
@@xxwolfie9xx846
Marshal Tito preferred Scotch whiskey (like me), vodka not as much.
Polish Vodka is better anyway.
@@VitorSilva-ee7vb
It is, but Swedish vodka is good too.
If somebody handed me a golfkart for an attack operation in a full scale war I´d start asking questions...
Better than walking I guess, at least they don't have to die tired.
You dont ask questions in military, not to say in war conditions
Honestly, with how this war is going, the time it takes to storm enemy positions is more crucial than armour in say a tank that can be stopped with 1 FPV drone.
Tactics have changed a lot from the start of 2022. Each group Has its own tactics that works better or worse depending on their situation.
Golf carts and motorcycles are probably being used for logistics. Better to make multiple small deliveries than have one large delivery get blown up. Ukraine is starting to use them too.
@@pcwildcat Nope...There are many, many videos online showing the Russians using the golf carts for assaults... They don't have the armoured vehicles they need.
In 1982 russia had 50,000 tanks, 49,000 pieces of artillery and 53,000 APC/AFVs. They also had 6,000 tactical aircraft. Might want to be careful.
In business it would be a massive cost overrun with minimal return. The exec would be definitely fired.
And would all receive massive golden Parachutes
This war will never stop
If you have to continuously reiterate that Russia is running out of X or Y for 2 years straight, doesn’t that mean they aren’t actually “running out”.
@@flfattire959 I see you missed the point this guy is very poorly trying to make. Short version is Russia has a lot of really old systems that are seeing use for the first time in 60 years. Seems like its a bad sign for Russia's future win or lose.
@@robertedwards2959 Wow. Maybe "we" should send the U.S.S. Donald Cook back in. Oh, wait. Too soon?
Not lost on me, I just don’t agree with the insinuations made from this information. Especially with a blatantly biased thumbnail like that meant to lure in Peter Zeihan stans.
@@TheBadCivilServant can explain what you mean? I don't see what a DDG has to do with this.
@@flfattire959 so you don't think Russia has been dipping into its Soviet era inventory?
using a golf cart as a troop transport is WILD
Transport behind the lines would be OK, but into combat...
Why
Using motor bikes too
@@Dillpickles719dirtbikes aren't that useless but Golfcarts slow and electric is hilarious
@@DOI_ARTS I'm pretty sure they're gasoline powered golf carts.
We keep hearing they're losing... But its been 2 years of "any day now"
He's not running out of Nukes...
What about Russian shovels and washing machine? When they're going to run out of them?
Im guessing there is a reason he just had a meeting with NK kim jong. The next weapons you see them using with have the NK insignia on the side
Remember in Halo 3 when you had to go into battle riding on the back of a Mongoose with your drunk friend driving while you whipped out your sniper rifle? Russia, that you?
The mongoose had more armour though
Russian Soldiers driving mongooses with RPG Passengers
@@Haloboss9572 And with each respawn they get dumber.
@@MrDmitryC and you don't have a shield, one hit and you are done for
Tanks can be replaced, tankers can't
They still have to replace trained tank crews. Not easy to do
Russia is living off Soviet nostalgia where they could field a 12 million man army. Now they resort to golf carts and 70 year old tanks.
they control 30 percent of Ukraine with their golf carts and shovels so..
Wait till truth news CNN and infographics show cartoons find out that most of Russias main army haven’t even stepped in Ukraine yet. 😂
And 70 year olds driving those tanks. 😂
Yeah, I was going to say one legless blind man driving
It is pathetic.
Or it is the drunken Russian idiocy.
Ukraine didn't "scuttle" any helicopters, scuttling is deliberately sinking your own boat or ship.
or submarine :)
One can scuttle anything it's not only for ships. The legal definition of scuttle: to deliberately cause something to fail. So it works with helicopters also but he uses it in an odd sense.
@brinkee7674 He straight up uses the word incorrectly. Your enemy can not scuttle anything of yours. They can sink, destroy, shoot down, etc but they can not scuttle your vehicles.
Black Sea fleet of Putler is on the bottom of the sea.
It's a shame when useful words like that with a very specific meaning get watered down through incorrect use by people trying to be clever.
Pour la 2`armée du monde, quand tu es rendu à envoyer tes soldats à l'asseault en moto ou en golf cart, tu es dans la merde. Même si tu as beaucoup de matériels, tu ne peux perdre 16 000 blindées de toute sorte et avoir encore du back up. Je plain les soldats russe ....
About time it ran out of dictators and Oligarchs!
The old crappy tanks they can muster can even be opened with a cheap and reliable Carl Gustav. It doesn't take an expensive Javelin.
I wonder about artillery tubes. Barrels wear out fairly quickly. Sometimes they have a lifetime measured in hundreds of shots. If barrels are used beyond their limits their accuracy declines and they become a danger to the crews firing the shells. High-quality artillery tubes are not easy to make. They require very specific alloys. How many spare barrels does Russia have, and how many are they producing? What is the quality of the currently produced tubes?
simple answer. Russia fires 10000 rounds of artelliry every day.
Ukraine fires about 2000.
So its not a barrel issue...
Its scale
Russia exports 7% of the worlds steel
It's a War not a Golf tournament.
1 tank in scrap metal prices = round £9000 Ukraine has a gold mine of scrap metals!
You said that six months into the war now is going on two years make it all makes sense
It‘s also important to remember that Russian supposed fifth gen fighters may well be inferior to western 4.5 gen fighters.
Ruzzia doesn't have 5th gen fighters. They have less than 10 SU-57s that have never seen combat and there's no proof that they're actually 5th gen. This is probably another Foxbat / F-15 situation.
@@BigBoy-ql5rn How you know about it ,Zelensky told you?
@@BigBoy-ql5rnF16s are very effective against civilians in robes and sandals but in Ukraine you’ll see them burning on truth news CNN.
@@klaraakop3091yes big boy, yes he did, it was all him, as if the rest of the world couldn’t figure it out. Now go make a two seater 5th gen stealth fighter so you can fly Putin around
@@andrej2321 Much more better fly Putin around then fly Biden around
No way. Russia can go on for years. They are prospering in spite of santions. Economically the war is benefitting their economy.
I doubt we’d be much better off. We’ve got no manufacturing.
Yes. That is why Russia need buy stuff from North Korea. You do not have real manufacturing capability.
On the West until recently, previous contracts were prioritized above the war expenditure. Idea that Western MIC has no production capability is funniest joke ever! The issue is that West did not see Russia as real threat.
Just like the US, Russia is not running out of pisspoorPoliticians
Wow, that was so smart, did you,come up with that yourself....that was so clever, very funny!
@@Cody38Super He's not wrong.
Imagine if MTG was the president, and for 20 years 💀
@@Korra228 Dystopian to the max.
@@Korra228 entertaining thought exercise, terrifying in practice
This video's comment section is hilarious. 😂
All i wonder is that if Russia starts running out and on the verge of collapse, i fear they will use nukes as desperation, i hope it doesn't happen
Russia is definitely going to feel equipment losses because the cost of replacement will be staggering, but there's zero chance they run out of soldiers. Russia has a potential pool of 22 million people and it doesn't take long to train basic infantry for meat assaults and those meat assaults, as many men as they've cost, have been effective over the last year.
"Potential pool" doesn't mean anything when people don't want to fight.
Миллиарды Путинов убитые лично призраком киева. Ваш бред уже скучно читать.
The problem is that Russia has a negative population growth since 2000s. Yes, they still have a big soldier pool but every death soldier means one less father. Eventhough Putin increased child support at 2010s, it resulted only a marginal increase at the number of babies. Also, Russia has a huge number of muslim citizens who probably have a higher birthrate, that can also be an issue. This war will wound Russia for decades to come.
Without air support and mechanized units, meat assaults will just end up being a meat grinder. How effective have they really been, if the territory isnt changing hands?
Most countries learned in WW1 that quantity doesn't beat quality in fights that don't involve swords and spears
Im guessing theyre banking on the time they won against nazis in a fight of quality vs quantity
But nazis were crippled with allied bombings and 80% of russian quality materials, food and fuel was given to them by united states, without those they would have fared worse than france
I get your point, but the exact opposite was learnt in WW2... Germany's vastly superior heavy tanks stood no match to the soviet union despite the soviets having no tank even close to it's level. Germany had the most advanced army in that time by far against the soviets, but the quantity of equipment and men the soviets were able to send to the frontlines were impossible to contain. I believe that the quantity russia has will never be stoppable by quality alone, and ukraine will reach a point where they'll not have enough pure firepower to contain the massive amounts of russian soldiers, despite the horrible quality their army currently has... That's just my speculation though, and of course modern war is much different from that of WW2.
WW II teach us Quantity won against Nazi
@@suportbghelp4938sure buddy Russia still hasn't deployed their wunderwaffen developed in secret under-the-ice labs in Siberia 😂 they are saving these for the confrontation with NATO troops. Let's just hope Russia as a state survives long enough to see those days...
@@suportbghelp4938where is Russia's t14 then where is the Superior su 57 felon😂🇷🇺🤡
It's called the military industrial complex, and Russia has one too.
China patiently waiting for their invasion of Russia xD
If you do the math of losses vs production and purchases, Russia has about two years before they run out of anything.
I also thought the same thing. It truly is the great mystery of how much they built up over the entire time from the end of WW2. If we look at it contemporarily from Dagestan/Chechnya to their Afrika korp campaigns to now I believe the same thing.
Thier in no danger of running out of any tech or hardware. If anything they are recycling decades of old shit. The USA is the one running out of certain ammo and has to revamp and open shell factories.
Agreed. But only if we expect it to keep the same pace as now. However, sanctions keep getting tougher, economy is tanking and morale keeps dropping. Right now putin is betting it all on Ukraine's alliance collapsing after trump becomes president. By the end of this year, or early next year we may see these projections changing.
@@MrDmitryC Morale dropping? Buddy, I know few RU who work here in Gazprom and they say that word among people is "if it takes five years, it takes five years". What collective west thought will happen is Putin will lose power and they will be able to instal their puppet president and "balkanize" RU. I honestly thought that RU shot itself in the foot by going into UA but now I KNOW that it's the collective west who shot themselves in the foot. Instead of braking RU apart, they managed to piss of Russians so much that average RU doesn't see this as RU - UA but RU - "west". So congratulations west, you played yourself. So strap on and hold tight, because "if it takes five years, it takes five years".
don't forget that Russia is using washing machine chips for their missiles
I mean, they are computer chips so they can be reprogramed. It's a choice of desperation
А тостеры у нас за РСЗО.
Russian washing machines have no chips. And neither should your LG ones 😂
@@helicoidsniffer1303no one toasts their bread in Russia. They have fresh real bread every day.