bro rockstar will not cook rdr2 sequal again no this time rockstar got so many IPs they can make midnight club 5 (pushing the PS6 limits and to make the new immersive racing game with new things that never came in forza horizon nor in need for speed) or they make Agent (and open world game pushing the PS6 to its ends, making the stealth into more detailed than any other stealth game ever made, bringing new ideas) or they make bully 2 (the open world game, potraying the school system and college system into whole new revolutionary way, bringing new ideas that never came in gaming before) or they make max payne 4 (making it an open world game, continuing other charctare rather than max, making the story much more fresh and newish) or they make manhunt 3 ( I dont like to thing about it) but tehy will not make rdr3 not this time, they have other IPs and they knew how to make perfect game
All the people saying that rockstar “gave up” on rdr2 are crazy. This was the most polished and perfect game I’ve ever played. It was not meant to be online focused like GTA. It was a love letter and an absolute MASTERPIECE to single player gamers. That was its purpose. Not some crazy fuckfest online.
I dont play video games but when covid hit I bought n Xbox and RDR2.. me and my wife sat on the couch every night, i played and she would hop on google when i needed some walk through tips. The story was like watching a movie and it will be one of the fondest memories of my marriage when i kick the bucket. It’s kinda corny but it’s reality. I haven’t played anything other than an occasional FIFA match since rdr.. but you can bet your bottom dollar that I’ll clear my schedule and buy a new console when RDR3 comes out…. Even if my wife is old and gray at that time😂😂😂
How is it crazy?!? RDR2 was great but Rockstar Games definitely gave up on the game because they were able to make more money with GTA Online. Originally the game was supposed to be significantly bigger and was supposed to receive story DLC but unfortunately a lot of content got cut...
RDR2 was a massive success, considered one of the best story modes of all time. Red Dead Online however was simply a sandbox game to test the new engine and other things for GTA6.
@ungvd1y of course, I loved the story mode, I was strictly speaking about online. Online was a flop, they never finished the online story and such. Just pisses me off they gave more love and care to GTA online. RDR online could have been something special
I was really disappointed with what Rockstar did with the Online. RDR2 is my legit favorite game of all time, I never waited with baited breath for anything like I did waiting for this games release. I beat it twice and I 100% it the second time. The only game I've ever done that with, to date. Online had so much potential. We never got houses, properties, proper heists or bank robberies. I would have gladly spent more for the above content if the gaming experience was there.
@granitemonkey having my own homestead instead of that stupid camp would have been wonderful. They could have had a cattleman role and had us go on a cattle drive to make money, just like that one mission in the story.
Having all of Mexico down there in RDR2 with only John's Epilogue really says a lot about how much this game got abandoned. There was enough room to have a handful of DLC content... and I never bothered to play GTA online. Some of us have no interest in paying for online content.
the only dlc for rdr1 we got was undead nightmare and that just added new enemies and reskins. gta5 didn't get a dlc and I don't know why anyone hoped we would get brand new single player content for rdr2. gta online is the mode that got expansions and story continuations.
If Take2 had brains, they would have pushed Rockstar to at least dedicate a small team to work on Mexico for use in Online & potentially to remake/remaster the original RDR with the same graphics from RDR2. That way they could have given the fans what they wanted, while also filling their pockets to the max. Every time I play RDR2 now, after completing the epilogue I kinda wish that we could hop straight into RDR1's story & just continue John's journey... Maybe one day some talented modder ends up doing a re-skin of RDR with RDR2 graphics, I guess we can only hope :(
Well said. Proper DLCs with genuine new content are the way forward and not pointless 'online' versions. I'd happily pay for the former, but will never pay for the latter.
I’m seeing a lot of talk about Rockstar giving up on RDR… but I don’t think that’s the case. Rather, I think that’s a negative way of looking at it. I believe they realized they wanted to focus all their efforts on GTA. People might not understand the absolutely immense and endless amount of manpower and money it takes to maintain a live-service game. Just look at what Sony did with Concord or what Naughty Dog did with their The Last of Us online game. I don’t think Rockstar lacks love for Red Dead Redemption (despite how frustrating it is that they haven’t provided current-gen support), but even a company as large as Rockstar has to allocate its resources wisely. As a fan of both GTA and RDR (admittedly I’m a waaaay bigger fan of RDR) I think it’s smarter for them to have focused on GTA instead of RDR2 online. I still believe we’ll see a brilliant Red Dead Redemption game, maybe in 6-8 years, but it will come!
i feel like RDR3 will be set in 1860-1870 , because thats the only period that they didnt explore and that would be the full wild west experience . let them cook
@@steezwts9093 wishful thinking, I'd love to see it in that time frame but I doubt we see it at all. Realistically, gta6 still probably has at least one or two more yearly delays, then gta6 online will be the only thing going for at least another 8-10 years minimum
They worked hard on bringing RDR2 to life, that’s no secret. Then they completely gave up on it, treating it like a nuisance, or something they just don’t care about. What happened after tells a WHOLE DIFFERENT story.
I don’t think its that exactly Rockstar games is too big of a company to focus too much on just one game Gta 5 is a rare case of course But I think they are well aware that their resources and time being transported on to some other title might be the best course of action considering they are already supporting gta 5 and how big of a game gta 6 is going to be Meanwhile if they also start supporting RDR 2, it could be waste of precious time and resources.
@@mikesiver1950There's nothing wrong with RDO. They've been calling the end of that game since the beta. It always has full lobbies. Everyone is always having a good time. Not nearly as toxic as GTA. And a great place to meet new friends. Don't believe the press.
That's true but we still don't know the fate of Sadie or Charles. We have a general idea but Sadie mentioned moving to South America and finding a husband and doing some bounty hunting. We also know that Rockstar cut big parts of Guarma out of RDR2, so they're sitting on tons of tropical island assets that went unused in the final version of RDR2 that could easily be used for South America
Yeah, being able to play as a native American would be really cool. I like the multiple characters' story mode. Have a Dances with Wolves type of storyline
You were not meant to... that's why you switch to the others... Trevor was a masterpiece the other two were boring. Arthur was wholesome that's why you related
Playing as a young Landon Rickets could be interesting. It's already established that he was in a gang and could tell the story of how he ended up on mexico. Could even be an opportunity to cross paths with a young Dutch.
@@lionelhutz5137that would be great but from what I have heard from Arthur when he mentions his father I think he was a down and out drunk and mind Arthur got with Dutch when he was in his teens
I feel like Red Dead Redemption story has been told, as was Arthur's. I feel Red Dead can live on, but as another story arc...sort of like Red Dead Revolver. New characters, new story. Interactive AI NPC's would be so cool to see in an open world Wild West game. Also the same things we wanted for RDR2- bank and train heists, properties, roles like in RDR2 online. I like to spend my time grinding, so I love the thought of trapping, trading, hunting, and survival being a big part of at least the epilogue or online. They left so much on the table from rdr2 and I'm honestly not even counting on there even being a Red Dead game in the next 6 years. Whatever the new game brings, I sure hope Rockstar doesn't abandon it like they did this one. RDR2 deserved so much better than what they gave us after the main story line.
Im still pissed at dutch for walking away while i died. He called me his "son" Yet he turned his back and walked away. I would rather not see dutch agian i may not be able to control my rage
I don’t know how no body asking for the origin story of the legend himself, UNCLE! i demand it, we need to know how he fought and struggle with lumbago👴🏼
I thought Uncle also. I think he would be perfect he seems like a washed up story telling old man. Would be cool to play him as a young bad ass gunslinger!!
I honestly would prefer a different story something to do with the war with the north and the south. Then trying to get the indigenous peoples onto reservations. That would be more interesting to me
I think it would be interesting to play as a native like Eagle Flies or as an escaped/free slave. Maybe even a combo of both - A duo trying to survive a changing world
it would really be great if they could cover it. like by 1890, there were huge native massacres. imagine fighting a last stand in that moment, or maybe surviving it, and being hopelessly hunted like animals by so called civilized men. maybe play as one of eagle eye's brother, or someone close to charles. id really love to spend more time with them. maybe too cliche, but giving them a chance to live, by surrendering to a treaty, knowing only for them to throw it away for revenge, by time of rdr 2, would be in line with rdr story
The biggest thing I would want in RDR3 is branch story lines. Meaning, if \ when you fail a mission, the story continues, but the failed mission changes future events. If that mission was essential to the main story, have a 2nd mission appear down the line that allows you to correct the failed mission from earlier. Or you don't get that friend \ ally, or piece of information, a villain mocks you and becomes a nemesis, you become wanted \ stand trial, a member of your gang is killed, etc. Love to see AI integrated into the NPCs. Multiple ways of completing a mission. Have earlier missions affect future missions. example, you stole a Gatlin Gun from an earlier mission. You now have an option from time to time to use that Gatlin Gun in future missions. If the Gatlin Gun mission failed, that option is not available for you in future missions.
a lot of people are underestimating mac callander and its quite surprising to me because mac is the closest thing to being the next protagonist because of the way the gang talks about him, and mac being the only van der lin member we do not see, nor know him on a personal level, wheras jenny and davey we know enough about them to know who they are exactly. mac callander is like this empty void in the gang thats super mysterious. it seems like rockstar already has plans for mac to be the next protag, but dont want to reveal too much because they want to get creative with him, makes sense why we dont know what he looks like, not even the clothes he wears, its as if we can customise him.
@@Redemptifyhe is actually reasonable though, the people that should NEVER become a writer for rockstar are people who want a Sadie adler/ Charles smith game lol
@@prowthegamershut up bruv you have literally no room to speak here considering you feel the need to cover everyones ass in the comment thread. thats also not the full jist of it, any other odea doesnt work as going further in the future isnt the wild west and its helluva a lot harder to introduce a completely new cast.
Ok hear me out: Upon reflecting on shows like 1923 and Yellowstone, An intriguing plot could revolve around Jack in the 1920s. Imagine Jack, the last owner of the ranch, grappling with the challenge of rebuilding and preserving his father's legacy. Amidst this journey, he experiences the horrors of World War I, subsequently embarking on a stint as a big game hunter in Africa. While there, he learns from an older Sadie or Charles that a rival rancher is eyeing his land. This revelation compels him to return and defend his ranch, all the while attempting to uphold traditional values in the face of advancing technology. The narrative could beautifully capture the evolution of Jack into a seasoned rancher, culminating in a glimpse of his descendants continuing the Marston ranch business in contemporary times. The story could conclude with an epilogue reminiscent of Yellowstone. I mean it’s pretty much 1923 and Yellowstone, but that could make an epic game.
@@Monkeyamingus777 agreed but then it wouldn’t be about the Wild West per say. More about the meeting point between traditional world views and industrial world views
what if it went the other way, and jack was involved in the prohibition/moonshining stuff, mobsters, tommy guns, pinkertons, early onset of cars and such, i dont know if they can beat rdr2 story line but man they got options...
It sounds cool but I would rather have a game based in the 1860-1870s the peak of the Wild West. Both red dead games is were the west is ending I want to see something where is just full on Wild West
I think everyone is looking at this wrong. You have to think about the future of the series through the final games reward you get after completing 100%. Legend of the West. And the Legend of the East. What's left? Legend of the North and Legend of the South. You know what that means? Civil War, baby! Everything about RDR2 is about the end of the West. It only makes sense that next two games should focus on the birth of the West. And what better backdrop than to place that game than the fallout of the American Civil War. All characters embody wild West archetypes. John is the Bounty Hunter. Arthur is the Outlaw Cowboy. The only other two archetypes I can think of is the famous Gunslinger and Duellist and the Lawman. My idea would be to make it a Civil War story between two men on opposite sides of the war. I would make my Legend of the North a former Union soldier turned lawman and I would make my famous gunslinger a former Confederate soldier. Have the story move forward in time instead of backwards like 1 and 2. So the next game after is a sequel but start at the end of the Civil War in the 1860s and then tag out that series into the late 1870s with a young Arthur and the Van Der Linde gang. So that transition will still be true to what RDR has set up.
I know that when it comes to any sort of sequels to anything that the powers that be are really into subverting expectations, and I get it… it’s interesting. But I love Arthur Morgan so much; probably even 10 times more than I loved John Marston… and where as I usually like my expectations subverted I think that exploring a younger version of Arthur and the Gang would be absolutely brilliant. One thing is for certain, we’ve always played these games near the end of the wild West, but why don’t we get a game where it’s in the absolute thick of the wild West.
I feel like Lyle Morgan would be a good idea because Arthur was a kid when he lost his parents and if he father was an outlaw obviously he wouldn’t tell his son he is so it could end with Lyle giving his son his hat and getting hung but Arthur thinks it’s for something completely different
I feel like RDR3 should include Dutch as the main playable character cuz we don't really know when he made the Van der Linde gang and how it progressed over time. So, i think making Dutch the main playable character would be the right thing to do, while having Hosea as a playable side character.
I kind of want a more modern story with jack marston, maybe where he goes to live in Montana and becomes a rancher and lives up there and protects the people or something like that.
I just hope they make some changes to the online play. Dedicated servers, anti-cheat? Maybe they could implement a subscription system that isn't mandatory? So hardcore RDO lovers can sub for bonuses but the casuals can still enjoy the online play. I dunno, i just want rockstar to get whatever revenue they need to keep online play in rdr3 alive and healthy like in GTO.
They probably wont even need mocap then. Modern AI can already create many custom Animations on demand (EA published a paper on that recently), by just looking at mocap data for a few hours. Im not talking about animations like ragdolls or slight differences in walking, but literally any animation can be generated on runtime.
What little AI based motion I have seen still looks a bit "uncanny valley". It's hard to explain, but it looks "too smooth" to be natural. It's weird. That said, it's definitely getting there. I think that's part of what the strike against the game industry is about.
As for potential story for Red Dead Redemption 3, I think it may be told from the opposite side of the law. A deputy who has family ties to criminality, and is often torn between his family and obeying the law
Hear me out. Play as Charles before he joins the gang. Have some lore behind what he was like before he was a gang member. Epilogue be him joining the gang and the Blackwater Heist. I think that would be pretty sick.
They should follow Jack after John dies. Him being apart of the one of the last Gunslingers in the west as more cities and town are being built. It would be cool to see some new places as well.
Oh shit. Just watched the whole video and realized I’m watching Hazard. Damn bro it’s been a while since I followed this content. Happy to see you still out here! Dude I would low key be down for a Pinkerton storyline. You are by default a law enforcer, but on the side doing shady deals and acting above the law. Idk why I feel that would be a good move, but haven’t thought what that story would be. Perhaps a whole other gang or a bunch of wild bandits that crop up and start local gangs in towns as they hop around and evade the Pinkertons.
i always thought that i we’d ever get rdr3 it would probably be a prequel to rdr3 with mac callander as a protagonist, since in-game dialogues seem to tease it to be like this. but this is my personal thoughts, because mac is never seen once, we don’t know much about him, and the way they talk about him was “yeah he was bad but he was also kinda good”, to me that sounds like a description for a future protagonist. but who knows!
I personally don't want a multi character system like in GTA 5. I think that's just not Red Deads thing. Those stories are based on following one character and another character that was heavily impacted by that character, the games are designed to tell in depth that one characters story. Thats why things like the character development and death of Arthur were so impactful, because we got to see it all start to finish from his eyes. I do not think he and his story would be nearly as impactful if we swapped between like Arthur, Javier and Charles. I really want to keep that formula, because its part of what makes those stories so great.
I’d love a new story in the golden age of the Wild West and with small references or nods to the Van Der Linde gang maybe just getting started or infamous and already on to the next state.
@@Anthony20084 why waste resources on making a next gen when all resources could be allocated to actually making rdr3. Everyone moans game developers don’t release enough or they rob us blind but yeah ‘PlEAsE mAKe NeXt GEn uPGrAdE aND chaRGe uS £50 fOR iT so I CaN coNTInUe tO MoAn’ 😂
I wanna see RDR3 bring back the strange map aka top hat guy “who some people claims to be the devil” and Dutch makes a deal with him which of course he breaks and it turns into the down fall of the blackwater heist and the gang of for RDR2.
New character, but you choose the male/female. then choose a role say gunfighter, cowboy, bank robber, etc.. then you choose a gang, then story line follows you in that gang. building skills. Taking like RDR2 and mixing with say like Diablo games, where you can be better like with rifles than handguns or breaking safes than pickpocketing. that be neat i think. or maybe you are the Pinkerton detective or US Marshall assigned to get the gang.
Meeting Arthur, Dutch, Uncle, and Hosea would be awesome. Going on missions with them as some kid lost in the world would be an amazing prologue for the game.
I would like Red Dead Redemption three to be set in the late 1910s through the 1920s as Jack Marston seeing what he becomes and continuing his character arc
Honestly I would love to play as Dutch he’s one of my fav characters but I’ve only ever played RDR 2. But I love Dutch he’s probably my 2nd or 3rd fav Arther is my number 1
My favourite story idea for rdr3 is Landon Ricketts for sure. He has a lot of already told potential with his segment in the first game with John and I think Rockstar could definitely make something of it.
Tbh, for the story i strongly agree with your opinion, and roger’s Clark comment, RDR1 locked our hands to make a new story for gang, and RDR2 completely finished the story, there’s nothing remaining, maybe a grand remake in the future, but for now, as you said, we need a completely new direction
In terms of the story either going further back in time with the existing characters or continuing Jack's story seem like the most logical and marketable options, but personally I just want a good story regardless of the setting. In fact someone like the younger versions of Maybelle "Black Bell" Colter or Landon Ricketts could make excellent protagonists , which could tie the game to the general Red Dead mythos without restricting the story too strictly with the Van Der Linne/Marston association. While I'd love to see more of Hosea, Dutch, Arthur and the rest of the gang, their story came full circle relatively conclusively in RDR2, so a new game focusing on their (even further) past exploits would hold a tremendous responsibility of telling a story that felt important and necessary.
Going back I think will be the best playing between John and Arthur. Seeing how Arthur built up trust and then got jealous of John. Find out exactly why it is that John ended up leaving and what he did when he was gone by following his trail. Then switching back and seeing how. Arthur really took over and became Dutch's right hand man. Then John being reinitiated back into the gang and possibly ending at blackwater. The only issue is that it won't have the traditional playing character dying instead. It would and with the failed blackwater heist.
I would absolutely love a new game in the franchise, but I think it has to go waaaay back in time and explore different characters entirely. Arthur's portrayal in 2, as well as John, are both TOO iconic and their narrative arcs feel absolutely complete. I think if you move that back in time and try to "explore" Arthur (or John) even further back in their lives when they were vastly different people than they were when we encounter them, you risk permanently ruining the legacy that's been built. Out of all the characters left from the franchise, the only one I think you can reasonably continue with (possibly) is Sadie. She's the only one with the motivation and capacity who survived to continue the game. But everyone she wanted vengeance against is now gone. And so is everyone she cared about except maybe Jack...and I have no idea how you approach that story. MAYBE you could bang out one more game with Jack as the protagonist where Sadie becomes a mentor figure of some kind, but we have to assume Jack is a wanted man as well since he killed Ross. I think the story of the Van Der Linde gang is finished...and perfectly so. I'm not keen on re-visiting its deep past. I would be VERY interested in a somewhat more in-depth "wild west simulator" version of Red Dead set in the earliest days of the Wild West? But I'm not sure where a story as deeply engaging and moving as RDR/RDR2 emerges from that. That's probably a very FUN game, but I don't think a game like that is particularly the kind of narrative game that Rockstar is looking to make, either.
As i play red dead, i really want to chop wood and build my own cabin, the camps dont feel like home, chop wood, free build a cabin, build fences for animal pens, etc... basically a more in depth once you start playing as john... bit being able to do that stuff earlier in the story
Rockstar has so many good characters they can make RD3 with for example Jack we know he is the longest member of the dutch van der linde gang or even give us some more insight on Kyle morgan Aurthur's dad.
I think rdr3 should be about Jack after the events of rdr1 and how he could of gotten into contact with Sadie and Charles, and what happened with him later on. Also would be interesting if we got like a cutscene explaining how he lived out his life in modern world, and if he actually wrote the book Red Dead.
that would be interesting if they make another prequel. it would be a unique or unusual thing having the storylines in a reversed order throughout the series. i mean, they kinda got some of us confused at first when we saw John alive in RDR2.
Rockstar did not give up on RDR2 guys. They just stopped adding content to the online version. The story mode is perfect the way that it is. It was already a massive game. I like to think of RDR2 online mode like gta 4 online mode. It was a trial. Whenever we get rdr3…I’m pretty sure the online mode will be even better.
I feel like a story centered around the Glanton gang would be great to explore. Blood Meridian explores similar themes of how the brutality of man and living these outlaw lifestyles only lead to suffering for everyone involved. Plus having Mexico to explore further during the mid to late 1800s would be a great change
I love the characters we have in the first 2 games but would love to see a new story during the 1863-1877 reconstruction era. So much they can do with that
I remember when there were no animals or NPCs in RDR2 online... the prices of goods changed... animals you killed disappeared. The game was so beautiful that I would have accepted an in game reason i.e. a drought, a recession or depression etc. The last straw was the missing Moonshine poppy recipe bug.
I think you could go a couple different directions: - You could play a Native in the west who toes the line of savagery/honor in the midst of the west. - A young Dutch Vander Lin: To show how Dutch ended up the way he did and what he went through. - Jack Marston as a sequel to the 1st red dead. - Or a new completely different badass character that is not related to the original story. I think all of these options would be a W
New story, new protagonist, new everything. I’m more into the online play. Add Natives, add stage coaches to purchase and add to your stable. I liked the blood money missions. Add a train heist finale mission, a bank robbery mission, and a high roller poker game heist. It’s not too much I can really think of because the formula is already good. Make the map bigger. I used to like riding to Mexico on rd 1. Im a fan of Butch Cassidy and Sun Dance movie, so a duo story line would be nice . But Im looking forward to see what they will come with.
People say you can’t top RDR2. Imagine video games with a dynamic experience. A dynamic story. With AI in 5-10 years you can have voice overs and content that change every play through. Not just different pre determined paths you’re taken down based on choices but completely organic paths that can never be duplicated. That’s the game I want.
Honestly a pretty cool story line would be to play as Jack and either work for the law, or be on the other side of the law, and still have the Honor system for either choice... I guess not a storyline but a good foundation lol
I’m not going to lie, I am more excited for Red Dead Redemption 3 than I am for GTA 6.
bro rockstar will not cook rdr2 sequal again
no this time
rockstar got so many IPs
they can make midnight club 5 (pushing the PS6 limits and to make the new immersive racing game with new things that never came in forza horizon nor in need for speed)
or they make Agent (and open world game pushing the PS6 to its ends, making the stealth into more detailed than any other stealth game ever made, bringing new ideas)
or they make bully 2 (the open world game, potraying the school system and college system into whole new revolutionary way, bringing new ideas that never came in gaming before)
or they make max payne 4 (making it an open world game, continuing other charctare rather than max, making the story much more fresh and newish)
or they make manhunt 3 ( I dont like to thing about it)
but tehy will not make rdr3
not this time,
they have other IPs and they knew how to make perfect game
Fax
Yes
100%
Dude GTA 6 will be GTA V with the world depth of RDR2 🤤
All the people saying that rockstar “gave up” on rdr2 are crazy. This was the most polished and perfect game I’ve ever played. It was not meant to be online focused like GTA. It was a love letter and an absolute MASTERPIECE to single player gamers. That was its purpose. Not some crazy fuckfest online.
Top 3 best games of ALL time
You get it. RDR2 online was just not going to pan out the same as GTA online because of timeline alone. Great take
I dont play video games but when covid hit I bought n Xbox and RDR2.. me and my wife sat on the couch every night, i played and she would hop on google when i needed some walk through tips. The story was like watching a movie and it will be one of the fondest memories of my marriage when i kick the bucket. It’s kinda corny but it’s reality. I haven’t played anything other than an occasional FIFA match since rdr.. but you can bet your bottom dollar that I’ll clear my schedule and buy a new console when RDR3 comes out…. Even if my wife is old and gray at that time😂😂😂
How is it crazy?!? RDR2 was great but Rockstar Games definitely gave up on the game because they were able to make more money with GTA Online. Originally the game was supposed to be significantly bigger and was supposed to receive story DLC but unfortunately a lot of content got cut...
Needs a current gen patch
They flopped with RDR2 online, they gave up on it so fast, it was a giant disappointment that they ended updates on it so quickly.
RDR2 was a massive success, considered one of the best story modes of all time. Red Dead Online however was simply a sandbox game to test the new engine and other things for GTA6.
@ungvd1y of course, I loved the story mode, I was strictly speaking about online. Online was a flop, they never finished the online story and such. Just pisses me off they gave more love and care to GTA online. RDR online could have been something special
I was really disappointed with what Rockstar did with the Online. RDR2 is my legit favorite game of all time, I never waited with baited breath for anything like I did waiting for this games release. I beat it twice and I 100% it the second time. The only game I've ever done that with, to date.
Online had so much potential. We never got houses, properties, proper heists or bank robberies. I would have gladly spent more for the above content if the gaming experience was there.
@granitemonkey having my own homestead instead of that stupid camp would have been wonderful. They could have had a cattleman role and had us go on a cattle drive to make money, just like that one mission in the story.
agreed It is an amazing game it is the the definitive wild west online game, so its a shame that they didn't care much about it
Having all of Mexico down there in RDR2 with only John's Epilogue really says a lot about how much this game got abandoned. There was enough room to have a handful of DLC content... and I never bothered to play GTA online. Some of us have no interest in paying for online content.
the only dlc for rdr1 we got was undead nightmare and that just added new enemies and reskins. gta5 didn't get a dlc and I don't know why anyone hoped we would get brand new single player content for rdr2. gta online is the mode that got expansions and story continuations.
If Take2 had brains, they would have pushed Rockstar to at least dedicate a small team to work on Mexico for use in Online & potentially to remake/remaster the original RDR with the same graphics from RDR2. That way they could have given the fans what they wanted, while also filling their pockets to the max.
Every time I play RDR2 now, after completing the epilogue I kinda wish that we could hop straight into RDR1's story & just continue John's journey... Maybe one day some talented modder ends up doing a re-skin of RDR with RDR2 graphics, I guess we can only hope :(
Well said. Proper DLCs with genuine new content are the way forward and not pointless 'online' versions. I'd happily pay for the former, but will never pay for the latter.
You expect too much
@@speshulk-e1m Rockstar got lazy.
I’m seeing a lot of talk about Rockstar giving up on RDR… but I don’t think that’s the case. Rather, I think that’s a negative way of looking at it. I believe they realized they wanted to focus all their efforts on GTA. People might not understand the absolutely immense and endless amount of manpower and money it takes to maintain a live-service game. Just look at what Sony did with Concord or what Naughty Dog did with their The Last of Us online game. I don’t think Rockstar lacks love for Red Dead Redemption (despite how frustrating it is that they haven’t provided current-gen support), but even a company as large as Rockstar has to allocate its resources wisely. As a fan of both GTA and RDR (admittedly I’m a waaaay bigger fan of RDR) I think it’s smarter for them to have focused on GTA instead of RDR2 online. I still believe we’ll see a brilliant Red Dead Redemption game, maybe in 6-8 years, but it will come!
Agree 100%. It's a nonsense to say they gave up on RDR2. They delivered the best single player game ever. EVER.
@@metalsmithnick8714yea rdr was never meant to be online focused. It’s truly a MASTERPIECE as single player only. And that’s good enough for me.
Yeah, Read dead has a huge fandom and is an extremely successful series, giving up on it would simply be idiotic.
wild to see you here garrett LOL
i feel like RDR3 will be set in 1860-1870 , because thats the only period that they didnt explore and that would be the full wild west experience . let them cook
Yes!
Absolutely agree 💯💯
If we don’t get LA/ San Frasisco in the 1880s then I want Dodge City in the 1870s, rip-off cities ofc
rdr 3 should not be about the van der linde gang imo but about arthurs father
@@TheUltimateFusionwarrior i think it should be a totally different story 🙏🏻🙏🏻
If there is a rdr3 in the works it will be 6 years or more before we see it.
That's a fair and realistic comment
@@steezwts9093 wishful thinking, I'd love to see it in that time frame but I doubt we see it at all. Realistically, gta6 still probably has at least one or two more yearly delays, then gta6 online will be the only thing going for at least another 8-10 years minimum
What's the world going to be like a year or more down the road?! Gaming keeps my sanity for a while anyway.
@@mcw-lg2dm Gta 6 didn't get delayed?
@@mcw-lg2dmyou guys think they’re going to milk gta 6 online as well? 🧐🤔
They worked hard on bringing RDR2 to life, that’s no secret.
Then they completely gave up on it, treating it like a nuisance, or something they just don’t care about.
What happened after tells a WHOLE DIFFERENT story.
Ya we aren't getting rdr3 Lol
I don’t think its that exactly
Rockstar games is too big of a company to focus too much on just one game
Gta 5 is a rare case of course
But I think they are well aware that their resources and time being transported on to some other title might be the best course of action considering they are already supporting gta 5 and how big of a game gta 6 is going to be
Meanwhile if they also start supporting RDR 2, it could be waste of precious time and resources.
We better. @@PistolArrow76
You’re talking about RDO. They did give up on that, mostly.
RDR2 is a gem, and the work they put into the game is evident.
@@mikesiver1950There's nothing wrong with RDO. They've been calling the end of that game since the beta. It always has full lobbies. Everyone is always having a good time. Not nearly as toxic as GTA. And a great place to meet new friends. Don't believe the press.
Most of us will be dead before RDR3 comes out anyways.
We would be Red Dead
@phucker I'm living to 130. I'll be here for red dead 7.
what are you a 70 year old man
Naw we will just be adults. I’m still playing I don’t care
I'm a grown woman and i play my RD2 and GTA on my days off love playing my games Period 💖
Rockstar needs to hire 4 thousand people so they double the time it takes to finish this damn masterpiece. Shut up and take my money already.
Would be nice but u think they got most of the best devs on this planet but they need to try
Yeah, i dont think you know how working at a company works.
@@mageguest you don’t either
@@kloka6247 Double the developers wont double the development time
The Van Der Linde Gang story has already been told. The West is a big place and it would be fun to explore a new story with all-new characters.
100%
Yeah this is what I think. I don’t think we’re getting another “redemption” game. It will be red dead something else
That's true but we still don't know the fate of Sadie or Charles. We have a general idea but Sadie mentioned moving to South America and finding a husband and doing some bounty hunting. We also know that Rockstar cut big parts of Guarma out of RDR2, so they're sitting on tons of tropical island assets that went unused in the final version of RDR2 that could easily be used for South America
@@Jordan-bv7on that's a horrible idea, i don't think that could possibly ever work
Yeah, being able to play as a native American would be really cool. I like the multiple characters' story mode. Have a Dances with Wolves type of storyline
This is the first game I ever got immersed in a game. Well over 400hrs & continue to find something new everytime.
5,500+ hours for me, and I still discover new details every now and then; so there is even hope for your future 😉
@@SadDetonator I lied lol. I have 7,452hrs played lmao. 310days 12hrs 24min
I still prefer the single playable character. I was so attached to Arthur. Never got attached to a character in GTA.
Me either
You were not meant to... that's why you switch to the others... Trevor was a masterpiece the other two were boring. Arthur was wholesome that's why you related
I’d be happy if they just kept alternating between GTA and Read Dead every 6-12 years lol
The only two games you'd ever need to play
They got so much money with GTA online they should be able to have both worked on at the same time
Playing as a young Landon Rickets could be interesting. It's already established that he was in a gang and could tell the story of how he ended up on mexico. Could even be an opportunity to cross paths with a young Dutch.
Rickets is top g honestly would be dope 👌
And a young Hosea and maybe introduce Arthur Morgan's father.
@@lionelhutz5137that would be great but from what I have heard from Arthur when he mentions his father I think he was a down and out drunk and mind Arthur got with Dutch when he was in his teens
Yeah but that doesn't really with with the REDEMPTION part of rdr. It has to make sense, plus landon rickets never redeemed himself.
@@call_me_mado5987 doesnt have to be redemption specifically, remember, there was a red dead: revolver.
At this point, ill be almost 60 before before we get an RDR 3
Please tell me you are now 58. Give us all hope for a 2025 RDR3 release 😁
@@SadDetonator I've got about 17 and a half years before I hit that
@@granitemonkey
Then I hope for you this translates into RDR3 and RDR4 😉
@@SadDetonatornah uh rdr 3 will come and my grandson will play😂
@@99ak
Lucky grandson! 😀
2032 to 2035 is what time frame you're looking at.
Sounds about right
@@HazardousHDTV I don't rule 2037 being out of the realm of a release date either.
@@HazardousHDTV It's like FO5, Bethesda release date is in the Early 2040's. Confirmed from a Todd Howard Private Conversation.
@@OleDirtyMacSanchezTodd and most the development team will be in hospice by the 2040s at least
RDR2077
I feel like Red Dead Redemption story has been told, as was Arthur's. I feel Red Dead can live on, but as another story arc...sort of like Red Dead Revolver. New characters, new story. Interactive AI NPC's would be so cool to see in an open world Wild West game. Also the same things we wanted for RDR2- bank and train heists, properties, roles like in RDR2 online. I like to spend my time grinding, so I love the thought of trapping, trading, hunting, and survival being a big part of at least the epilogue or online. They left so much on the table from rdr2 and I'm honestly not even counting on there even being a Red Dead game in the next 6 years. Whatever the new game brings, I sure hope Rockstar doesn't abandon it like they did this one. RDR2 deserved so much better than what they gave us after the main story line.
Im still pissed at dutch for walking away while i died. He called me his "son" Yet he turned his back and walked away. I would rather not see dutch agian i may not be able to control my rage
yessss
Ya
I'm a hardcore gamer and this is the only game that got me interested in the actual story line. I usually just skip away.
Same
I don’t know how no body asking for the origin story of the legend himself, UNCLE! i demand it, we need to know how he fought and struggle with lumbago👴🏼
Back when he was known as the, "One shot kid"!
@@c24nk yup😆
There’s some theories that Uncle is the main character from red dead revolver, the first game in the series
@@mr.kendeeman2573wasn’t that debunked by rockstar
I thought Uncle also. I think he would be perfect he seems like a washed up story telling old man. Would be cool to play him as a young bad ass gunslinger!!
I honestly would prefer a different story something to do with the war with the north and the south. Then trying to get the indigenous peoples onto reservations. That would be more interesting to me
That would actually be sick dude, I’ve always thought they need to do a a whole different gang and maybe not even have a gang
I think it would be interesting to play as a native like Eagle Flies or as an escaped/free slave. Maybe even a combo of both - A duo trying to survive a changing world
it would really be great if they could cover it. like by 1890, there were huge native massacres. imagine fighting a last stand in that moment, or maybe surviving it, and being hopelessly hunted like animals by so called civilized men.
maybe play as one of eagle eye's brother, or someone close to charles. id really love to spend more time with them.
maybe too cliche, but giving them a chance to live, by surrendering to a treaty, knowing only for them to throw it away for revenge, by time of rdr 2, would be in line with rdr story
The biggest thing I would want in RDR3 is branch story lines. Meaning, if \ when you fail a mission, the story continues, but the failed mission changes future events. If that mission was essential to the main story, have a 2nd mission appear down the line that allows you to correct the failed mission from earlier. Or you don't get that friend \ ally, or piece of information, a villain mocks you and becomes a nemesis, you become wanted \ stand trial, a member of your gang is killed, etc. Love to see AI integrated into the NPCs. Multiple ways of completing a mission. Have earlier missions affect future missions. example, you stole a Gatlin Gun from an earlier mission. You now have an option from time to time to use that Gatlin Gun in future missions. If the Gatlin Gun mission failed, that option is not available for you in future missions.
Dam good idea. Thats what gaming needs anyway.
Plot twist: With RDR2 they were only testing some of their visions for GTA 6.
origin story for da van der linde gang would be 🔥
a lot of people are underestimating mac callander and its quite surprising to me because mac is the closest thing to being the next protagonist because of the way the gang talks about him, and mac being the only van der lin member we do not see, nor know him on a personal level, wheras jenny and davey we know enough about them to know who they are exactly. mac callander is like this empty void in the gang thats super mysterious. it seems like rockstar already has plans for mac to be the next protag, but dont want to reveal too much because they want to get creative with him, makes sense why we dont know what he looks like, not even the clothes he wears, its as if we can customise him.
THANK GOD you're not a writer for their games
@@Redemptifyhe is actually reasonable though, the people that should NEVER become a writer for rockstar are people who want a Sadie adler/ Charles smith game lol
@@dogeshow2651
Fr or the ones who want Blackwater as the final mission 💀😭
@@prowthegameryou’re right, it shouldn’t, it should be the mission after that’s the final one where mac runs off and dies to pinkertons
@@prowthegamershut up bruv you have literally no room to speak here considering you feel the need to cover everyones ass in the comment thread. thats also not the full jist of it, any other odea doesnt work as going further in the future isnt the wild west and its helluva a lot harder to introduce a completely new cast.
Ok hear me out:
Upon reflecting on shows like 1923 and Yellowstone, An intriguing plot could revolve around Jack in the 1920s. Imagine Jack, the last owner of the ranch, grappling with the challenge of rebuilding and preserving his father's legacy. Amidst this journey, he experiences the horrors of World War I, subsequently embarking on a stint as a big game hunter in Africa. While there, he learns from an older Sadie or Charles that a rival rancher is eyeing his land. This revelation compels him to return and defend his ranch, all the while attempting to uphold traditional values in the face of advancing technology. The narrative could beautifully capture the evolution of Jack into a seasoned rancher, culminating in a glimpse of his descendants continuing the Marston ranch business in contemporary times. The story could conclude with an epilogue reminiscent of Yellowstone.
I mean it’s pretty much 1923 and Yellowstone, but that could make an epic game.
One problem with this concept
The wild west has been Dead for a few years
@@Monkeyamingus777 agreed but then it wouldn’t be about the Wild West per say. More about the meeting point between traditional world views and industrial world views
what if it went the other way, and jack was involved in the prohibition/moonshining stuff, mobsters, tommy guns, pinkertons, early onset of cars and such, i dont know if they can beat rdr2 story line but man they got options...
It sounds cool but I would rather have a game based in the 1860-1870s the peak of the Wild West. Both red dead games is were the west is ending I want to see something where is just full on Wild West
Great idea
I think everyone is looking at this wrong. You have to think about the future of the series through the final games reward you get after completing 100%. Legend of the West. And the Legend of the East. What's left? Legend of the North and Legend of the South. You know what that means? Civil War, baby!
Everything about RDR2 is about the end of the West. It only makes sense that next two games should focus on the birth of the West. And what better backdrop than to place that game than the fallout of the American Civil War.
All characters embody wild West archetypes. John is the Bounty Hunter. Arthur is the Outlaw Cowboy. The only other two archetypes I can think of is the famous Gunslinger and Duellist and the Lawman. My idea would be to make it a Civil War story between two men on opposite sides of the war. I would make my Legend of the North a former Union soldier turned lawman and I would make my famous gunslinger a former Confederate soldier. Have the story move forward in time instead of backwards like 1 and 2. So the next game after is a sequel but start at the end of the Civil War in the 1860s and then tag out that series into the late 1870s with a young Arthur and the Van Der Linde gang. So that transition will still be true to what RDR has set up.
I know that when it comes to any sort of sequels to anything that the powers that be are really into subverting expectations, and I get it… it’s interesting. But I love Arthur Morgan so much; probably even 10 times more than I loved John Marston… and where as I usually like my expectations subverted I think that exploring a younger version of Arthur and the Gang would be absolutely brilliant.
One thing is for certain, we’ve always played these games near the end of the wild West, but why don’t we get a game where it’s in the absolute thick of the wild West.
great video 👍 wow 😳 I would like to see Jack revenge and the add ons included thanks for reading 😎🎉
I feel like Lyle Morgan would be a good idea because Arthur was a kid when he lost his parents and if he father was an outlaw obviously he wouldn’t tell his son he is so it could end with Lyle giving his son his hat and getting hung but Arthur thinks it’s for something completely different
I think Arthur described this man as abusive and most people wouldn’t enjoy playing as someone like that
@@crryptid abusive but never said who he was abusive too and Lyle could be the reason his mother got killed but he might not be the killer
@@josephharby They could give him a redemption (saving arthur)
I feel like RDR3 should include Dutch as the main playable character cuz we don't really know when he made the Van der Linde gang and how it progressed over time. So, i think making Dutch the main playable character would be the right thing to do, while having Hosea as a playable side character.
Its crazy to think it could get better than RDR2. That game isnt just a video game. Its an experience.
Used to watch all of your red dead online videos. Glad to see you’re still succeeding and giving us great info. Keep up the great work man.
I kind of want a more modern story with jack marston, maybe where he goes to live in Montana and becomes a rancher and lives up there and protects the people or something like that.
I just hope they make some changes to the online play. Dedicated servers, anti-cheat? Maybe they could implement a subscription system that isn't mandatory? So hardcore RDO lovers can sub for bonuses but the casuals can still enjoy the online play. I dunno, i just want rockstar to get whatever revenue they need to keep online play in rdr3 alive and healthy like in GTO.
IMO, if they weren't going to do an RDR3, they would just come out and say it.
i am placing blocks because im in fucking minecraft
5:29 AYO!!! Spider-Man getting freak nasty 😂😂😂
I think it would be really cool if rdr3 was about Jack after rdr1
The brain trust behind The Red Dead series has all left. I have no faith. Sorry Dutch
Idk why this is being overlooked. 2 key guys are gone. Dan Houser and Lazlow
@ at least they have a game coming
How much new mo-cap would they actually have to do? It's not like the mo-cap data gets "outdated".
They probably wont even need mocap then. Modern AI can already create many custom Animations on demand (EA published a paper on that recently), by just looking at mocap data for a few hours. Im not talking about animations like ragdolls or slight differences in walking, but literally any animation can be generated on runtime.
What little AI based motion I have seen still looks a bit "uncanny valley". It's hard to explain, but it looks "too smooth" to be natural. It's weird. That said, it's definitely getting there. I think that's part of what the strike against the game industry is about.
As for potential story for Red Dead Redemption 3, I think it may be told from the opposite side of the law. A deputy who has family ties to criminality, and is often torn between his family and obeying the law
Hear me out. Play as Charles before he joins the gang. Have some lore behind what he was like before he was a gang member. Epilogue be him joining the gang and the Blackwater Heist. I think that would be pretty sick.
I just wanna play as jack Marston fighting in the trenches at the battle of verdun😢😂
They should follow Jack after John dies.
Him being apart of the one of the last Gunslingers in the west as more cities and town are being built. It would be cool to see some new places as well.
Yes that’s good the van de linde gang story is over
i dont want a rdr3 if there going to give up on it
that's dumb
I would definitely want another red dead, I don't care about online and Rockstar has yet to disappoint in a single player experience
I still would take it over nothing at all though
Just because they release RDR3 does not automatically mean you will get an online game as well
That dumb because you don’t want it if there going to give up on it? So you don’t want it at all? 💀
Oh shit. Just watched the whole video and realized I’m watching Hazard. Damn bro it’s been a while since I followed this content. Happy to see you still out here! Dude I would low key be down for a Pinkerton storyline. You are by default a law enforcer, but on the side doing shady deals and acting above the law. Idk why I feel that would be a good move, but haven’t thought what that story would be. Perhaps a whole other gang or a bunch of wild bandits that crop up and start local gangs in towns as they hop around and evade the Pinkertons.
I'll be a grandfather before RDR3 drops, and I don't even have kids.
i always thought that i we’d ever get rdr3 it would probably be a prequel to rdr3 with mac callander as a protagonist, since in-game dialogues seem to tease it to be like this. but this is my personal thoughts, because mac is never seen once, we don’t know much about him, and the way they talk about him was “yeah he was bad but he was also kinda good”, to me that sounds like a description for a future protagonist. but who knows!
I just want rdr3 online to be as good as rdr2 online but with new content
Rdr2 online is garbage
I love the idea of the story based on Hosea and Dutch, and you can get to chose which player you want to play
Sorta like Call of Juarez 2?
Oh dear
No more van der linde gang for the love of god
@@dogeshow2651
Fr we need something new
I personally don't want a multi character system like in GTA 5. I think that's just not Red Deads thing. Those stories are based on following one character and another character that was heavily impacted by that character, the games are designed to tell in depth that one characters story. Thats why things like the character development and death of Arthur were so impactful, because we got to see it all start to finish from his eyes. I do not think he and his story would be nearly as impactful if we swapped between like Arthur, Javier and Charles. I really want to keep that formula, because its part of what makes those stories so great.
I’d love a new story in the golden age of the Wild West and with small references or nods to the Van Der Linde gang maybe just getting started or infamous and already on to the next state.
Can we get a next gen version first?
No that’s just stupid…
@@smokey2471Why???
@@smokey2471 More stupid than beating the dead horse of GTA5 across 3 consoles? 😂
@@Anthony20084 why waste resources on making a next gen when all resources could be allocated to actually making rdr3.
Everyone moans game developers don’t release enough or they rob us blind but yeah ‘PlEAsE mAKe NeXt GEn uPGrAdE aND chaRGe uS £50 fOR iT so I CaN coNTInUe tO MoAn’ 😂
@@smokey2471 You're not taking into account the greed of R*. 😂😂 Taking your money is their top priority.
I would like to see a story revolving around Sadie Adler and her becoming a bounty hunter after the events of RDR2
Yeah that would be good
Slept on idea. It would be and sound like the best option
Why would you want to play as a girl? You'd get your arse kicked in every bar fight. Gotta keep it real
I wanna see RDR3 bring back the strange map aka top hat guy “who some people claims to be the devil” and Dutch makes a deal with him which of course he breaks and it turns into the down fall of the blackwater heist and the gang of for RDR2.
I just completes the main story of RDR2 and I can’t explain what an experience that was. Can’t stop thinking about it
If they make RDR3, I hope it’s in the golden era of the West and during the time of the civil war. I think that would make for such a cool game.
How bout' Red Dead Revolver 2
With Jackie as a bounty hunter.
There’s nothing here man, I mean literally nothing lol.
Lyle Morgan's story, goes into young Arthur joining Dutch and Hosea
Bad idea
New character, but you choose the male/female. then choose a role say gunfighter, cowboy, bank robber, etc.. then you choose a gang, then story line follows you in that gang. building skills. Taking like RDR2 and mixing with say like Diablo games, where you can be better like with rifles than handguns or breaking safes than pickpocketing. that be neat i think. or maybe you are the Pinkerton detective or US Marshall assigned to get the gang.
Meeting Arthur, Dutch, Uncle, and Hosea would be awesome. Going on missions with them as some kid lost in the world would be an amazing prologue for the game.
How bout just one new content update for rdo
Oh dear
Yes
I would like Red Dead Redemption three to be set in the late 1910s through the 1920s as Jack Marston seeing what he becomes and continuing his character arc
Nothing to do with the west
Red dead fan's have the worst sequel Ideas
As always Hazard, great stuff.
Thank you my friend!
Can’t wait for rdr3. I played it for the first time this month and wow this game gave me so much joy as much as gaming back during my childhood
Jack being an outlaw then ww1 then finding redemption
Honestly I would love to play as Dutch he’s one of my fav characters but I’ve only ever played RDR 2. But I love Dutch he’s probably my 2nd or 3rd fav Arther is my number 1
8:16 damn they made Dutch look exactly like a young Steven Segal in this picture
I want to see either Dutch’s story from the begining of the vanderline gang, OR an 1920’ Gangstar type shit
My favourite story idea for rdr3 is Landon Ricketts for sure. He has a lot of already told potential with his segment in the first game with John and I think Rockstar could definitely make something of it.
Imagine if they’d add in Trevor into the old western games💀💀 hed fit perfectly
The soundtrack alone is amazing. I personally like " True Love".
Gavin would be the only true choice for a main character in RDR3
Tbh, for the story i strongly agree with your opinion, and roger’s Clark comment, RDR1 locked our hands to make a new story for gang, and RDR2 completely finished the story, there’s nothing remaining, maybe a grand remake in the future, but for now, as you said, we need a completely new direction
In terms of the story either going further back in time with the existing characters or continuing Jack's story seem like the most logical and marketable options, but personally I just want a good story regardless of the setting. In fact someone like the younger versions of Maybelle "Black Bell" Colter or Landon Ricketts could make excellent protagonists , which could tie the game to the general Red Dead mythos without restricting the story too strictly with the Van Der Linne/Marston association.
While I'd love to see more of Hosea, Dutch, Arthur and the rest of the gang, their story came full circle relatively conclusively in RDR2, so a new game focusing on their (even further) past exploits would hold a tremendous responsibility of telling a story that felt important and necessary.
A ps6 rollout with a rd2 bundle would go crazy
Going back I think will be the best playing between John and Arthur. Seeing how Arthur built up trust and then got jealous of John. Find out exactly why it is that John ended up leaving and what he did when he was gone by following his trail. Then switching back and seeing how. Arthur really took over and became Dutch's right hand man. Then John being reinitiated back into the gang and possibly ending at blackwater. The only issue is that it won't have the traditional playing character dying instead. It would and with the failed blackwater heist.
I would absolutely love a new game in the franchise, but I think it has to go waaaay back in time and explore different characters entirely. Arthur's portrayal in 2, as well as John, are both TOO iconic and their narrative arcs feel absolutely complete. I think if you move that back in time and try to "explore" Arthur (or John) even further back in their lives when they were vastly different people than they were when we encounter them, you risk permanently ruining the legacy that's been built.
Out of all the characters left from the franchise, the only one I think you can reasonably continue with (possibly) is Sadie. She's the only one with the motivation and capacity who survived to continue the game. But everyone she wanted vengeance against is now gone. And so is everyone she cared about except maybe Jack...and I have no idea how you approach that story. MAYBE you could bang out one more game with Jack as the protagonist where Sadie becomes a mentor figure of some kind, but we have to assume Jack is a wanted man as well since he killed Ross.
I think the story of the Van Der Linde gang is finished...and perfectly so. I'm not keen on re-visiting its deep past.
I would be VERY interested in a somewhat more in-depth "wild west simulator" version of Red Dead set in the earliest days of the Wild West? But I'm not sure where a story as deeply engaging and moving as RDR/RDR2 emerges from that. That's probably a very FUN game, but I don't think a game like that is particularly the kind of narrative game that Rockstar is looking to make, either.
I think Dutch would be cool as a mc in rdr3
I’d love to see a story where the main protagonist is Jack and the timeline is the late 1910’s to the 1920’s.
As i play red dead, i really want to chop wood and build my own cabin, the camps dont feel like home, chop wood, free build a cabin, build fences for animal pens, etc... basically a more in depth once you start playing as john... bit being able to do that stuff earlier in the story
Rockstar has so many good characters they can make RD3 with for example Jack we know he is the longest member of the dutch van der linde gang or even give us some more insight on Kyle morgan Aurthur's dad.
I think rdr3 should be about Jack after the events of rdr1 and how he could of gotten into contact with Sadie and Charles, and what happened with him later on. Also would be interesting if we got like a cutscene explaining how he lived out his life in modern world, and if he actually wrote the book Red Dead.
that would be interesting if they make another prequel. it would be a unique or unusual thing having the storylines in a reversed order throughout the series. i mean, they kinda got some of us confused at first when we saw John alive in RDR2.
Rockstar did not give up on RDR2 guys. They just stopped adding content to the online version. The story mode is perfect the way that it is. It was already a massive game. I like to think of RDR2 online mode like gta 4 online mode. It was a trial. Whenever we get rdr3…I’m pretty sure the online mode will be even better.
I feel like a story centered around the Glanton gang would be great to explore. Blood Meridian explores similar themes of how the brutality of man and living these outlaw lifestyles only lead to suffering for everyone involved. Plus having Mexico to explore further during the mid to late 1800s would be a great change
No Dan Houser, no red dead redemption.
I love the characters we have in the first 2 games but would love to see a new story during the 1863-1877 reconstruction era. So much they can do with that
W video man
“I’m gonna try and answer every question you have” I have zero questions so off to a great start
I remember when there were no animals or NPCs in RDR2 online... the prices of goods changed... animals you killed disappeared. The game was so beautiful that I would have accepted an in game reason i.e. a drought, a recession or depression etc. The last straw was the missing Moonshine poppy recipe bug.
I mean I really would love to see how the gang got together and what happend in blackwater but It also be cool to see it from another point of view.
I think you could go a couple different directions:
- You could play a Native in the west who toes the line of savagery/honor in the midst of the west.
- A young Dutch Vander Lin: To show how Dutch ended up the way he did and what he went through.
- Jack Marston as a sequel to the 1st red dead.
- Or a new completely different badass character that is not related to the original story.
I think all of these options would be a W
New story, new protagonist, new everything. I’m more into the online play. Add Natives, add stage coaches to purchase and add to your stable. I liked the blood money missions. Add a train heist finale mission, a bank robbery mission, and a high roller poker game heist. It’s not too much I can really think of because the formula is already good. Make the map bigger. I used to like riding to Mexico on rd 1. Im a fan of Butch Cassidy and Sun Dance movie, so a duo story line would be nice . But Im looking forward to see what they will come with.
People say you can’t top RDR2. Imagine video games with a dynamic experience. A dynamic story. With AI in 5-10 years you can have voice overs and content that change every play through. Not just different pre determined paths you’re taken down based on choices but completely organic paths that can never be duplicated. That’s the game I want.
Honestly a pretty cool story line would be to play as Jack and either work for the law, or be on the other side of the law, and still have the Honor system for either choice... I guess not a storyline but a good foundation lol
I am playing this game now a days your video help me a lot thanks for this video ❤ Hazard ❤