Matt Wolfe Podcast: Simulation Theory, Immortality, AGI & Crypto
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июл 2024
- NEWSLETTER ✉️ dylancurious.beehiiv.com
PATREON 💰 / dylancurious
00:00 - What are the odds that we’re living in a simulation?
03:20 - What are the odds AI solves the problem of aging?
05:00 - What are the odds your kids live to their 200th birthday?
05:20 - What are the odds AI will invent new biological species on earth?
06:48 - What are the odds you visit a real life Jurassic park?
07:41 - What are the odds your kids (ages 9 & 11) never get a driver’s license?
09:24 - What is Matt Wolfe’s p(doom)?
12:54 - Will AI be able to predict human behavior?
15:51 - Will Microsoft and OpenAI achieve AGI first?
22:00 - Will a company announce a trillion dollar infrastructure?
24:58 - Will AI video reach Hollywood quality movies?
29:14 - What are the odds we transition to a new economic system?
35:18 - What are the odds we alone in the universe?
37:06 - Will AI be more impactful than the Internet?
38:46 - Could we eliminate 95% of bias from AI systems?
41:06 - Will AI have genuine emotion?
44:10 - Will AI systems be able to reproduce?
46:05 - Matt Wolfe’s thoughts on crypto currency?
48:56 - What movies have Matt Wolfe been influenced by?
WATCH THE RUclips VIDEO ⤵
• Matt Wolfe Podcast: Si... 
Развлечения
![Natanael Cano x Oscar Maydon - Giza [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eXCS6-MSQ_Y/mqdefault.jpg)
I had a blast having this chat! Thanks for bringing me on. These are definitely questions that made me think. PS, other than stocks and investments, I suck at making predictions. ;)
We should do this again in like a year and see how my opinions and perspectives have shifted. I'm constantly exploring and changing my opinions and beliefs on things as I'm presented with new info. :)
I just appreciate you sharing your perspective! I feel lucky to have had a candid conversation with you about this rapidly changing world.
Two of my faves together!
Matt was so amazing!
PEPENNEDY is intriguing. Looking forward to exploring more!))
Huge collab more of this please
I will keep trying. Not a lot of creators this big have time but I am thankful Matt made time for me.
YOOOO the two OGs. Big up Dylans great stuff
Yeah! It was so fun to interview him! I feel super lucky!
I clicked on the video thinking it was just a matt wolfe video and was confused when i saw it was your channel lol. Love to see two great creators collab!
That’s so funny! Well, hopefully you enjoyed our collaboration. It was definitely Matt Wolfe in a different context than his usual videos which I appreciate him for doing an interview.
Nice collab!
Glad you think so! Matt is so cool. Excited to meet him.
Solid point Matt: in 2023 a trillion dollar AI infrastructure - in terms of Petaflops that that suggests today, will cost a lot less in 2030 due to chip improvements and inflation, that could be cut in HALF solely by the 5+/- generations of Nvidia chip progress between now and then. So when people discuss a "trillion dollar compute" prediction for 7 years away, I think that's using today's yardstick.
In other words, at some point in the future it's a certainty that an order of magnitude (10x) better will actually cost LESS than current 1x capability.
Case in point, the first Cray-1 super computer was installed in 1976 at a cost of $10M when I graduated from high school. Today, an $80 Raspberry Pi has 4x the compute and the same amount of memory.
Wow. Imagine more money, plus better hardware, plus more efficient algorithms.
@@dylan_curious They all contribute their share to the reality of exponential progress!
Matt called it with the gov oversight at 17:25 considering OpenAIs new board appointment hahaha
Yeah. He has a good pulse on that stuff.
Love this chat
Great video. Two top guys. You two should do more of these chats.
I’m definitely thankful for his time. Probably won’t ask him for another interview for a while but maybe one day. I am going to keep trying to have these conversations with other people though so let me know if there’s someone you think I should reach out to.
Watch you both regularly; this team up was great 👍🏼 👍🏼
Great to hear! I watch Matt regularly also. He has such a great pulse on the industry!
I like the interview questions
Thanks. 🙏 I tried to keep the question high level and thoughtful. I hope it gets a good reception.
We are born small and get bigger. This shows that we are not made of the same stuff we were born with. We eat, our body replaces itself constantly. Immortality would come from adjusting the body so it repairs itself fully. Doesn't matter if you life in this atmosphere. As long as you eat, sleep, drink water, you could keep living. But then what happens? I think society wouldn't know what to do with an immortality serum. Even just a double life expectancy would shake things up pretty drastically.
We are clearly in a sim. That's why I pray to the admins.
Also adapting to changes in the modern world will be nothing like adapting to changes two or 300 years from now and I wonder if our sense of self is even up for that challenge?
@@dylan_curious The thing I ponder is if our brain can store the memories that far into the future. How much stuff of our past would go missing. We'd need memory augmentation. And if society keeps changing as fast as it does now, might we get sick of it.
Or, if the folks who make society live longer, so there are no young people rising to fill the places left by the dead, might our society stagnate.
Change generally requires youth.
But if I had a young body, would I feel like a young person again? I'm willing to give it a go.
Nice content love the mashup👍👍👍
So glad. I really hope this video gets good views. I love these interviews.
Very interesting!
Glad you think so! Thanks for leaving a comment. That definitely helps the channel grow.
Great!! Matt rules!
I know! He’s the best and it was really nice of him to take time to jump on a podcast with me!
RE: UBI - I think at least the US will end up doing a Universal Work Guarantee - a modernized WPA.
Politically more acceptable to those who still work and pay taxes, answers the question of letting people feel they're earning their living, etc.
I’m a Muslim and I believe in simulation theory and maybe I’m just putting a subjective dots together. In Islam we are being tested to see if we can pass a test. My initial critique on Islam was that I thought it was unfair for god to judge a person in the circumstances they were born in. However, in a simulation theory if all your decisions have played out in parallel to the timeline you live in now and you become aware of all the realities after you die for a more fair judgement of your soul.
whaaat its Matt Wolfe! this is great
I know!! He is the best.
unexpected collab
I know! I am so excited to launch it. Been editing for a few day thinking how did I get this interview. I feel super lucky.
@@dylan_curiousit's so nice tbh
It was nice to hear Matt point of view but it would have been interesting to hear you discuss
about these subjects
I feel like I’m always rambling about my opinions so I just wanted to make sure he got a chance to speak but in the future, we can definitely move towards more discussions.
Def a fave episode sering the like us authenticity is awsome thanks matt for putting self out there so relatable and Dylan for taking step to ask all others don't but we all would want to know n ask ourselves ❤
I’ve never been one for small talk. I love just asking the big questions and getting people thinking. Thank you for watching and leaving a comment.
End the simulation.
Unplug from the matrix.
Interesting. I actually think of simulation theory to be similar to ancient beliefs, eastern and western. There's the concept of maya in hinduism, and hermeticism is a western example, but there are many many more examples. Yeah it's not exactly the same, but similar, just from our modern frame of reference.
When I think about ancient Egyptians and their gods, ancient Romans and their gods or ancient Aztecs and their gods, it makes me wonder if one day in the future human will think back to Western America around 2025 and view simulation theory in the same way.
@@dylan_curious It wouldn't surprise me at all
Hot take: I love Chappie.
Oh.. every once in a while someone just loves that movie! I need to see it.
I just finished watching Terrence Howard and Eric Weinstein on the JRE for the past 4 hours. I can't wait to watch this.......
Feedback to come! 👍✨👁️⚡🔎
Oh. how was it? People online are saying it was a smackdown. But I don't know much about the drama.
@@dylan_curious absolutely mind blowing! Not a smackdown at all. A good lesson in humility and to stay in your lane. Eric stole the show. It was hilarious, entertaining and educational beyond any Rogan show I've ever seen. Definitely worth watching. 👁️
@@dylan_curious I clipped a few shorts if you want to check them out before you watch the episode. 👍
I've been the most impressed when interacting with Anthropic's LLMs. I'm not doing anything scientific to measure it, but the feeling of talking to something as intelligent or more intelligent than a person comes from Claude's responses rather than ChatGPT. Even Perplexity AI has impressed me more than ChatGPT. But that's mostly because of how I want the LLM to respond to my questions.
Does Perplexity give you more human like interaction? I don't use it much, but I always thought of it as a research tool that brought me a bunch of links and summaries.
I wonder if the working theory of consciousness will remain secret knowledge or be revealed to the general public.
I got a feeling it’s not gonna be an easy thing to explain. It probably won’t be a secret. I think anybody can wrap their head around it if they want, but even when they try, they’ll realize that it’s too complex too truly understand instinctively, but we will have tools that will give us insight into it.
Great video. My two bits is this: It's not a black and white answer to all the queries. Technology makes things easier and smart people while work with it to do things that we haven't thought of yet. The one thing that is better than AI is AI plus human. Those that grow with AI instead of outside of AI, will prosper.
If Simulation Theory turns out to be correct, could AGI be used to find vulnerabilities in it that we could exploit, and potentially modify the source code for the simulation itself? Is it possible that whoever created the simulation also left easter eggs for us to find?
I don’t think we could ever modify the source code unless they let us but if the simulation creators want us to edit it I guess it might be possible. Or if they want easter eggs that would be interesting also. A lot to think about.
Jesus the Mexican intern who accidentally fell into the simulation like in Tron.
Haha. Oh man. What if. That visual caught me off guard.
reality isn't a simulation. the physical universe is a simulation. big difference.
and yes, the Creator created the simulation.
Oh… that’s a good point. I was kind of treating them like they’re the same thing in the video I should’ve separated the concepts.
Or bodies break down over time... Err but the cells in most part of our bodies are no less than 8 weeks old, they are replaced constantly but somehow "aged" to look like old cells. Eg hair. That DNA sequence code to prevent that aging exists and will be found... They say brain cells don't regenerate but that is not technically accurate.
Well, he's not a molecular biologist, so what else can you really expect??
At least, in principle, you could replace every cell in the body and still be yourself. That is a weird concept. We’re only a system, but not individual components.
Cells are replaced at differing rates by type. Neural brain cells, eye lens cells, some muscle cells and others are NEVER replaced.
We've already found how to ROLL BACK cells ("cellular reprogramming") and it will be tested and likely in production for the first two applications around 2030 or so: your DOG's longevity (less risk if it has some side effects), but then also human eyes. The underlying expectation is that we can eventually do this for any cell in the body, and potentially an unlimited number of times. I rather expect anyone in their 30s today will live quite easily to 150 if not more.
I think it will be possible to prevent ageing and disease, but I'm not sure most of us would want to live forever, at least in the way we're currently hard wired. We evolved in a way that suffering is a necessary part of being human. Perhaps we could change that, but by that time we definetly wont be human anymore. Not saying that's a bad thing. I don't know the answer to these questions.
@@henrismith7472 Who would make anyone "live forever"? First off, unnatural death sooner or later will occur in "forever". Secondly, most likely euthanasia will be a thing for those that are "done" for any reason. The goal is to live AS LONG AS YOU WANT TO while HEALTHY, which for most people today, we aren't CLOSE TO.
I don't think suffering is necessary to make us "human". We've been trying to end human suffering since we evolved from apes.
Matt lacks a bit of imagination in some areas, but not all. I sense that Dylan sees the future better (ie like I do ;) ) but an interview with Dylan would be interesting.
I see the future as Matt does, so I would like to introduce the next step. AI Robotics with a Bio-Nero Network growing in fungi that is alive. @megaprojects9649 Fungi Computers ruclips.net/video/5mIWo6dgTmI/видео.html
The above video tells us about mushroom computers and that a bio-computer runs as fast as a supercomputer.
@TechCrunch Living Skin ruclips.net/video/I29fGcD-eaE/видео.html
I was thinking of a robodog with a bio-computer and a tung that can drink water to keep its brain alive. Now give a humanoid AI Robot living skin. You need to ask, ‘Are these robots alive?’
If life is a simulation, the programmer must suck at making it a good and fun place to exist in lol.
Depends on the purpose of the sim lol
Think about how people treat their Sims in the games... Some want to make them succeed, some want to live out fantasies, some only want to watch the world burn. Seems plausible.
Maybe the whole idea of good and fun are just for our simulation. Who knows how deep the rabbit hole goes. It hurts my brain to think too much about it.
For both of you... so in 2015 I wrote a novel... I also released that novel as Open Source... its freely downloadable (Use Smashwords as Amazon charge money for my book despite numerous emails to them) anyway (see In Lucem Solaria)... and remember I wrote this almost 10 years ago... and despite it being Sci Fi, and its heavy sci fi with simulation theory, ASI and so on... well I inadvertently predicted all sort of things... the pandemic for one, brexit, a change in society that we are witnessing right now, polarization etc. Anyway its free, and its addresses this topic, and NO I personally do not think we live in a simulation, information theory tells me that ultimately this is not possible. Immortality may be possible, I cover that in this book too. But of course that would not be forever cos the universe will end one day.
They say that life mimics arts and definitely a lot of the newest technology that we’re seeing now is inspired by sci-fi writing so congrats on being ahead of the curve
@@dylan_curious Well there are a few things in that book might be better avoided. In the book we were rather lucky, benevolent (or at least no malevolent) superintelligence, and there was only one! Unfortunately as you guys discussed back in the real world you can be sure presidents and prime ministers are briefed weekly on where their nation is on AI and there are a bucket of players.
Also congrats on your channels take off, it seems its cooking up rather nicely.
No we leave to new planets
Would be interesting if Nvidia bought one of the models out there.
They are building some of their own models. They will for sure be a player.
The body being broken down by external forces is kinda why having a body is better than... furniture... - it _rebuilds_ itself.
If you think about it it’s a miracle we stay together and oppose entropy for as many years as we are alive.
@@dylan_curious Science is only now catching up to this, starting to realise there are other fundamental forces than entropy, like... the opposite of entropy. 😛 It is the very definition of life, to create order out of disorder.
@@jvlbme Imagine what ASI is going to tell us about existence. We will be shocked I bet whatever it is.
Probabilistic nature of physics, uncertainty principle and our own propensity to create simulations gives me a Bayesian prior that I'm probably in a simulation, probably unmanned. So it doesn't change much
That’s such a good way to think about it. We have a Bayesian prior.
@@dylan_curious Best epistemology I know
@@alexanderg9670 Physics isn't probabilistic, though. It has rules. The problem is we have mathematicians looking at these probabilities and confusing a descriptive language created to convey quantifiable reality, with being reality itself.
@@VaeldargUncertainty principle. With our current best theory and tech level of tools if you measure one parameter of a small particles precisely tools affect it such that other parameters only could be inferred probabilisticly
Though, it's a shame that high-level statistical approach made is way into other sciences and caused the ereplication crisis. Macroworld obeys Newton laws and such, no need for fancy math
@@alexanderg9670 It's simply that at some point the "fancy math" became confused for reality. Math is just a language used to describe reality, then it was used to predict it, but now have confused physicists asking if math was "invented or discovered". Treating the term "information" as if was a physical property. Reality is under no obligation to go by napkin math where someone chose to write "2+2=5".
I think life could be a simulation per say, maybe not by our definition in terms how it is run, and there also be a God.
It would be ironic if heaven is paradise and we delay going there by living 500+ yrs
@@MeatyChubbsYep hahaha
Yeah, anything that feels like a simulation in our universe doesn't necessarily need to be part of the simulation that made us so you're probably right about how we got the definition wrong.
Far before pixels were a thing, Einstein claimed that reality was an illusion, albeit a persistent one. 😊 What you see is not what is, but rather your brain's best approximation given the data & your abilities to register them. It's all likely far more interesting than we'll ever even know how to know. As to whether or not we're in a simulation, what difference does that make? Whatever _this_ is, we're caught up in it & the quantum universe doesn't have to play by the same rules by any means, so sure, for all we know we're just a bad dream a future GPT is suffering, lol. 😅 Like so many of us getting older far faster than we'd like to, I'm hopeful but not terribly optimistic for myself; too little too late and all. The next generation, sure; but what's that going to do to the already explosive overpopulation of the world? It doesn't bode well, so we better get our butts into space fast haha. 😊 Having, like you folks, toyed with all of these systems, I imagine any doom from AI will come from it's "best intentions". I certainly don't think we should expect any great advancements from a given LLM alone (how limiting!). No, real AGO will most likely come from a MoE approach that allows the LLM to be the "thinking" part of the brain, but that incorporates a butt-ton of backend systems as well. You don't have to think about breathing, you just do it, right? Hell, even a lot of our thought processes happen "under the surface" so it'd be fitting if an AI replicated & then improved upon that. Anyway, as someone with a signed copy of "Snow Crash" just to my right, I'm quite intrigued to see how this new "Diamond Age" unfolds. ;)
28:15 Just curious, Matt & Dylan, how much of the furniture in your home is handcrafted? How much came from IKEA? Do the math.
29:50 "Brought to you by Carl's Jr." - sorry, just wanna make sure I get my funding, *cough*. Sad but true, Matt. Funny that UBI works so well in so many other countries, but in the USA our asses pucker up tight at the very notion for whatever reason. With the way things are going, something along those lines is going to be absolutely mandatory though, so I've no doubt it'll work itself out... if we all live that long, anyway. As for where UBI money comes from, yeah, it'd be taken as a tax from those who are making money, which, in this case, would be the AIs and/or the corporations governing them. If they've got all the power & all the money, it seems only sensible that they kick a bit back down the the rest of the world that's allowed them to profit so well, eh? In the end, without us, what use are they anyway?
35:25 Oh, good. At least Matt's not so foolish as to be "humancentric" in this vast cosmos! 😆Hell, we're a minority as a species on our own planet (ants have us beat, hands down lol) and we're talking about a BIG ass universe, most of which we can't even perceive. As for why we don't "see anyone else", I can postulate a couple of things; either we're not interesting enough to be of note to anyone else out there or, (and terrifyingly more likely) they know better than to make too much noise 'lest the attract attention. There may be scary, scary things out there in the deep, deep dark. Tales of the "old gods" came from some poor bastards broken vision of something, eh? All tentacles and superliminal spaces and stuff. 😆
37:06 AI _is_ the next Internet, or at least a large part of what it will be. Everything we've been building since the 90s in HTML, etc. was just a precursor, a cache of information, that these new tools can now run with and make active use of. The "net" is becoming a whole new creature as we watch.
38:50 I'm not sure how we could ever hope to achieve such a bias elimination by simple fact that the data we train these models on is already, to whatever bent, inherently biased. There's no "clean" data that humans haven't touched to use as input.
41:10 *snortle* Hell, I wonder if the people I interact with on a day to day basis are capable of such things, let alone the systems I have to interface with. Just smile & nod, etc...
44:04 Sorry, I thought we'd already broken that barrier. Machines building machines is nothing new, and they're going to be better & faster at it than we've ever imagined when they really get the means. Granted, it's not like they can just do so without the proper systems in place (at least, at the moment), but what do we do in 10 years when they can?
46:00 I've got a fistful of shitcoins, lol. I suppose if any of them go "to the moon" at some point, I'm set, but even at the beginning I was wary of the tech. The blockchain sounds great, but it's only so strong as the blockchain it's built on. I've built blockchains; it's not hard. Maintaining them is a matter of usage, like language... Latin? Who the hell speaks that shit anymore? You've got "currency", sure, but that doesn't mean it's valuable or translates.
50:00 I'd honestly never heard of "Her" until the GPT voice fiasco, lol, but I'm gonna have to watch it. War Games, now, that's my jam haha! I was a war-dialing hacker in the 90s and know far more about the underlying foundations of the 'net we're all surfing than most people do ('cause nerd). Hell, I ran a dialup BBS on a 2400 bps dial-up modem way back when hahaha. Good times.
I think he also said “God does not role dice” and “I like to believe the moon is there even when I am not looking” but your right about the illusion quote also. Just shows how mysterious reality is.
@@dylan_curious Hey now, no fair! I'm not done watching, let alone commentating 🤣 (seriously, only 19:00 in - gimme a bit, this is gonna be a thesis haha). Great to see you here in the comments though. Good on ya!
@@kpr2 Are you dont yet? It's up for 2 hours now and it's only 1 hour long. 😄
@@dylan_curiousAhem. Alright, now I'm done... I think. 🤓
People have been stretching the limits of the imagination for thousands of years. Think about the Greek philosophers for example.
Yet, regardless of man’s attempt to figure out the purpose of life, everything is anchored by truth. Contrary to popular opinion, there is one truth….Jesus.
While conversations such as the one in this video are intriguing, ultimately our driving force is to seek our Creator. God purposely placed a “magnet effect” within us that pulls us toward Him.
By accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior, we trust His promise to give us eternal life. But we also realize that we have a great purpose, which is what so many people are looking for.
Our purpose is to have a wonderful relationship with God, and lead others into His kingdom.
Keep sending us the great videos.
A True AGI or TRUE superintelligence will NOT be available to me or you, something they CALL AGI or ASI will be accessible, but it will never be what is actually behind the curtain, You just keep speaking blindly into the future as though there will be no one trying to block your end run towards a touchdown.... what we CAN have and what we will be allowed to get are two completely different stories, but which story is the most likely reality?
what about the people who create little or almost no data??........... bad idea...... the money would have to go into the Govts hands first and then distributed equally... or something to that effect, it'll be a long time for all this to be settled into an actual smooth working system and in the meantime, there will be suffering.
Power will be from small modular nuclear reactors
Honestly that might be a great idea for many of these larger organization.Like Microsoft's 100 billion dollar Stargate cluster.
Not going to happen. They continue to fail competitively. In the last year alone we've installed the equivalent solar power as 120 1GW nuclear power plants in the world. Everyone laughed a decade ago at Greenpeace's estimate for solar energy in the world by 2030, and we've already surpassed that by 50%.
And now, not a month goes by without a significant breakthrough. The latest is Perovskite solar which FAR exceeds the efficiency of the panels in production and is WAY cheaper to make.
I have 3 brothers and TWO of them have huge solar initiatives being built next to them. One, in Indiana, will be 2,600 acres of solar panels, enough to retire TWO coal power plants and power the entire county.
And all the while fusion is making huge progress in the background.
There's simply no longer any reason to use nuclear, other than possibly the tiny new batteries they are making that can last decades for small devices. But no more grid scale usage is warranted, necessary or even competes well against the alternatives.
If its a simulation, i think it would be a training & testing simulation for people or entire species. Sadly westworld portrays this pretty coldly.
I need to watch that whole series. I just saw bits and pieces of it.
The Fermi Paradox and the Drake Equation should be understood and brought up in any discussion of the probability of life elsewhere. As far as "seeing" "someone" out there, in a universe some 13.8 billion years old, we've had radio technology only since 1900 when speech was transmitted ONE MILE via a radio signal. That isn't a relevant date though, since we didn't have enough power in any early radio transmissions that would penetrate far into space until much later.
So we're talking about a
Wow. This was a great read. I knew of the equation but never heard it explained in terms of what it means like this. Ok then. Maybe we are talking to them it’s just too early in the conversation to get a response.
@dylan_curious Thanks! "Too early" for sure. Remember, even a miraculous chance response to the first I Love Lucy episode broadcast 75 years ago won't get back from the outer circle of that 100 light year distance for another 125 years, since it's a 200 year round trip!
I just had Perplexity (as Chrome add-in) do the math, and unless it's hallucinating, it's about 1,270 light years out in radius that gets us about 1 million suns, or ONE instance of Drake life (overlooking WE are that, so maybe should be 2 million suns!). So the round trip from I Love Lucy is now "just" (1270x2)-75 = 2,465 years away from today!
Quick note to add that I enjoy your approach in the videos. Between AI Explained for the deeper tech peek, and Matt and you, I get a pretty good picture of progress and can readily just skip over any overlap if need be.
Ha! Dylan! Your camera is so low quality that it makes you look like a generated video with morphing and glitches. 😄
Maybe each person is in their own simulation where they are the only one not simulated. Can you really verify anyone else besides yourself is conscious?
Yep, I've thought about this since I was a small child hahaha. I've found people don't appreciate it when I call them a potential NPC though lol
No you can't. It's really hard to disprove the "brain in a vat" thought experiment.
If it was so impossible to tell, why would it matter? It's not like you came up with the definition of consciousness, you learned it from those "simulated" people.
Matt doesn't seem to get the concept of why a next token predictor needs to be able to reason to be able to be good at predicting the next token. He seems to be falling for the argument that it's "just statistical" which is a gross over-simplification and doesn't represent reality. I'm not surprised because he's never been very technical or academic, but he made good content that was also timely.
I don't mean that as an insult. He says the same. You just shouldn't expect expert opinions from him.
For sure, some of these questions I know are outside of the wheelhouse of the people I ask them to, so I am very lenient with their answers. It’s interesting just hearing other perspectives. But yes, between you and me there’s definitely something meaningful about the distance between tokens that can be described both statistically and meaningfully.
@@dylan_curious For sure, and as a commentator he's still in touch with a lot of the non-technical goings on and his opinions are as good as anyone as far as predictions of the future.
My background is a blend of audio production, video production, and marketing. Those are the fields I've worked in deeply. I got into AI because it provided me new ways and new tools to explore those areas. I've only recently started diving deeper into truly understanding how all of these systems work as well as exploring the philosophical and ethical implications of where this is all headed. So these questions were definitely outside of my normal wheelhouse. However, they gave me new insights into where I should explore and educate myself further. :)
Right now i belive in luck not simolation theory not what ever
God created the simulation. He put us in here in a training ground. We learn here and take it with us
I like to think I am on earth to learn. Deep down I don’t know what the point is but I need that belief.
I really like that it is multiplayer. Singleplayer would be boring
@@WackyGameEngineerif it's a simulation, it might not actually be multi-player, but many different "training" scenarios
Skynet is the world’s largest authoritarian surveillance system in China with over $600,000,000 cameras throughout. They’re creating a 2.0 and putting cameras on the moon, too. All verifiable facts and you see the robot dogs with weapons, so it really isn’t all that unlikely that it could play in a terminator-like way… I would not be surprised if a robot army somewhere on earth is already being made.
@@dylan_curious Existence doesn't need any point to it, it isn't some story someone put together. That doesn't stop people from making up their own "meaning of life" (or making up the idea of a creator that they should follow due to empty promises, and not get in the way of the leaders getting power/wealth due to empty threats).
I'm hardcore Christian, AND I think simulation-theory is the perfect modern explanation for everything the Bible describes ... We live in a simulation, and God is the all-knowing Programmer/Admin in complete control.
We have gone full circle.
It definitely feels like the most religious science mix that I’ve come across for a while. There’s also that thing about how the quantum wave only collapses when there’s an observer.
@@dylan_curious I think the idea that religion and simulation-theory somehow contradict each other, or just isn't the same thing, is deep cognitive dissonance.
Many people have been conditioned for decades to somehow hate religion, and can't see anything beyond that. Which is kinda sad ... but the Bible actually tells us this would happen in the later stages of the simulation :)
@@ZappyOh The Bible tells you that everyone else is just a hater because that's what EVERY cult says. "don't trust anyone else, even your own family, only the cult leader". Look at scandals involving the Catholic church, don't act as if there are zero valid reasons for hating religion. It isn't that they're conditioned for decades to hate religion, it's that you were conditioned over CENTURIES to love it (even as it has exploited you and not actually answer any of your prayers).
@@dylan_curious Scientists don't mean a consciousness when say "observer", though. The "observer" is anything used to try looking at the quantum particle. The problem is even using a photon is like trying to measure Earth's rotation by throwing a planet-destroying asteroid at it. Those photons affect what is trying to be measured/detected, hence the uncertainty principle. And religion has ALWAYS pretended to be going by science, because science has credibility where religion does not. A certain religion once referred to what we now know of as space "the heavens", because that's where the religion said Heaven was. Then we actually managed to fly into "the heavens" and found no paradise. Then the religion's followers just moved the goal posts and went "uhh, actually Heaven is in another dimension..." as an excuse.
@@Vaeldarg 2 Thessalonians 2:3
I'm just saying the first part looks like a prediction, that matches our current time, and no other time.
But, I'm not here to convince you of anything, you judge for yourself.
If Jesus is a programmer, I’m really not a fan of his latest PR. Please source the code.
idgaf if a human made it, yall ego's can suffer, ill take the optimal route