Clarke and Dawe - Australian Voting to be Outsourced. Millions Saved.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 149

  • @whitey640
    @whitey640 2 года назад +117

    Who'd have thought a skit on submarines from 7 years ago keeps getting more relevant with age?

  • @AndyFNQ84
    @AndyFNQ84 3 года назад +41

    "We do have an industry policy don't we?" OMG that last line nearly killed me

  • @xXSinForLifeXx
    @xXSinForLifeXx 5 лет назад +353

    "We can outsource our voting to India and China "
    "But they know nothing of the issues that we deal with "
    "Yes Brian it will be exactly the same as it is now "
    Fucking lol sad thing hes not wrong

    • @xXSinForLifeXx
      @xXSinForLifeXx 5 лет назад +19

      "But these people overseas will need to be told who to vote for "
      "Yeah it will be axactly as its always done Iv already told you Brian "

    • @jesusislukeskywalker4294
      @jesusislukeskywalker4294 3 года назад +1

      christopher pynne expected to be announced public enemy number one any minute.

  • @beninglis8097
    @beninglis8097 10 лет назад +128

    Haha I remember as a young child I thought Clark and Dawe were real politicions...

  • @Gredddfe
    @Gredddfe 3 года назад +53

    More intelligent than anything Tony Abbott ever said.

  • @tomdrahos7739
    @tomdrahos7739 3 года назад +37

    If only Tony Abbott were this well-spoken.

  • @changer_of_ways_999
    @changer_of_ways_999 Год назад +8

    It's scary how accurate this is.

  • @alexanderarden2152
    @alexanderarden2152 2 года назад +8

    Ahhh watching this again now with hindsight of how events unfolded make it even funnier 😂

    • @blechtic
      @blechtic 4 месяца назад

      You mean making the French redesign their nuclear subs for diesel and then ditching them because they weren't nuclear?

  • @jon-francis9289
    @jon-francis9289 2 года назад +23

    John Clarke RIP. He was priceless. Long after his passing he still speaks to us.

  • @DamienJByrne
    @DamienJByrne 10 лет назад +97

    0:58-1:12 is just about the funniest thing I think they've done.

    • @wothin
      @wothin 4 года назад +1

      Could u explain the joke?

    • @jonwhite3265
      @jonwhite3265 4 года назад +19

      @@wothin the Japanese bombed Australia in that war with submarines

    • @wothin
      @wothin 4 года назад

      @@jonwhite3265 thanks

    • @jonwhite3265
      @jonwhite3265 4 года назад +3

      @@wothina little late to the game obviously but no worries

    • @kossend1
      @kossend1 3 года назад +5

      @@wothin Also Tony Abbott was once lost for words and did that exact thing for 28 seconds.
      ruclips.net/video/9wT9XS_TvzQ/видео.html

  • @orourkea
    @orourkea 4 года назад +68

    Gladys saw this whilst shopping for NSW ferries and didn't understand that it was satire.

    • @jesusislukeskywalker4294
      @jesusislukeskywalker4294 3 года назад

      oh lebensborn people .

    • @JasonBlack66
      @JasonBlack66 3 года назад +1

      Ferry Mc Ferry Face? I don't see the connection between that and subs?

    • @orourkea
      @orourkea 3 года назад +11

      @@JasonBlack66 This was a very specific reference to current affairs when I wrote it. From an ABC article at the time;
      "Ten new Sydney ferries won't be able to pass under bridges on the Parramatta River with people sitting on the top deck. Transport for NSW says passengers will need to be called to the lower deck before the ferries can pass under the Camellia Railway Bridge and Gasworks Bridge.
      The Opposition's transport spokesman said it was a huge design flaw of the new River Class ferries, which were built in Indonesia."

  • @SEEKnowles
    @SEEKnowles 10 лет назад +5

    Ha Ha! The definition of an expert: Someone from a very long long way away!!

  • @PietroSperonidiFenizio
    @PietroSperonidiFenizio 5 лет назад +12

    I'm at a conference on Voting Theory ("Computational Social Choice"). It starts tomorrow, and I am just laughing seeing all this. I wonder how I can share it with the colleagues :-)

  • @eljimberinoq5518
    @eljimberinoq5518 7 лет назад +12

    Hello to the people of Western Australia!!!

  • @ponder2006
    @ponder2006 8 лет назад +21

    1:00 Best segment ever!!! I'm crying

    • @iancurtis1152
      @iancurtis1152 7 лет назад +1

      He was only ever a minute man.

    • @BleedingUranium
      @BleedingUranium 6 лет назад +1

      I feel I might have missed the joke there. :(

    • @saintsaens21
      @saintsaens21 4 года назад

      @@BleedingUranium I don't get it either. Ponder2006 can you help us?

    • @wothin
      @wothin 4 года назад

      Help us

    • @wothin
      @wothin 4 года назад

      @@iancurtis1152 help us explain the joke

  • @xXSinForLifeXx
    @xXSinForLifeXx 5 лет назад +15

    "You gotta have a an industry policy Brian , so you explain why thing sure more important then the policy "
    "You gotta start somewhere "
    Lol

  • @tsawy6
    @tsawy6 3 года назад +24

    "I would love to do that, but short of doing that, we have to do what we're doing at the moment!"

  • @adamhofman4933
    @adamhofman4933 4 года назад +10

    The $40 Billion has blown out to $200 billion now!

    • @georgehastings2263
      @georgehastings2263 3 года назад +2

      Typical LNP policy . Out source to a foreign country hoping it would be cheaper

    • @adamhofman4933
      @adamhofman4933 3 года назад +2

      @@georgehastings2263 yep, whilst growing the unemployment rate! 🤷‍♂️

  • @paddlepop77
    @paddlepop77 10 лет назад +10

    Classic!

  • @alanhill769
    @alanhill769 2 года назад +2

    They will be playing these up to the minute, current topical issues 40 years from now. And they will be exactly that. Right up to the minute, current topical issues then. It will be like Back to the Future 5. (Back to the Future 4 is due out this year) P.S. Back to the Future was released in1985. That was 37 years ago.

  • @thhseeking
    @thhseeking 3 года назад +6

    Yes, we have/had a submarine building company in South Australia. They did a good job with the Collins class, didn't they?

    • @markward2824
      @markward2824 3 года назад +4

      Within global defence circles the Collins class subs are highly rated

    • @JohnJ469
      @JohnJ469 3 года назад +4

      You could try asking the Captains of warships that have heard "Down Under" on the hydrophones. ;)

    • @Aasn9
      @Aasn9 3 года назад +1

      We had to bail out the French after they lost their shirts when the US forced them to default on a contract to build 2 Mistrals for the Russians.

    • @darthslackus499
      @darthslackus499 3 года назад

      @@markward2824 "Within global defence circles the Collins class subs are highly rated"
      Ya. Sure by WW2 standards. Collins doesn't even make the top 10 attack submarines.

    • @zoravar.k7904
      @zoravar.k7904 3 года назад +2

      @@darthslackus499 most of these rankings are based on paper stats. Which are of little use in an actual encounter. What you do with the tools you have and how those tools synergize with the wider defense strategy makes a much larger difference. On paper the first German tanks were fairly shite compared to the french offerings. But they used them much better in WW2. Same reason why the best armed military ran away from Vietnam and Afghanistan, they didn't develop proper counter strategies to insurgency operations.

  • @kyneticist
    @kyneticist 10 лет назад +7

    What a colossal waste of money. Our governments incompetence knows no bounds.

  • @artyfarty3
    @artyfarty3 10 лет назад +2

    HAHAHAHA !!!! absolutely BRILLIANT !!!! omg ! lol ! roflol !!! this is the best one to date ;) I can't stop laughing ! lol ;) !!!!! - seriously You guys cracked my funny bone or something .... lol ;) I might have to go and see a doctor about this .... oh , wait ..... I don't have $7 ..... lol ;) .... might have to outsource it to a doctor in India or China ... ;)

  • @frednutz1604
    @frednutz1604 4 года назад +6

    5 years down the track & a new government but NO CHANGE!!

    • @abbimilagon5499
      @abbimilagon5499 3 года назад +1

      Yes. And it won't matter who gets in next. Same story. Promise the world. Get in and do nothing. They amount of laws and regulations they keep putting in place. The whole industry will just die and all end up over seas with less regulations and law's and licences and fees . Like most things we buy in Australia are made over seas . But just put together here to say they are made in Australia.

    • @kiwibonsai2355
      @kiwibonsai2355 3 года назад +2

      Those in power have been laughing all the way to bank since trickle down economics scam was played in the 80s.
      Since then selling your country out to make as much as possible before things hit the fan is what's the lobbying is all about. Even with the Internet and knowledge of the scam we are still told nothing to see move along.

    • @abbimilagon5499
      @abbimilagon5499 3 года назад

      @@kiwibonsai2355 true Australia is not a good place to live anymore. All our freedoms are gone. Great Britain still has better law's on freedom's. With its huge population.

  • @maxg4958
    @maxg4958 3 года назад +1

    The cost is now 89b$, and maintenance cost over the life of the assets is 145b$...

  • @williambtm1
    @williambtm1 10 лет назад +5

    Such a tragic government we have to contend with today.
    I wonder, can we outsource the hunt for a better more loyal to Australia government, surely there are much more qualified and sincere governments available in our World than what we now have to suffer yet still contend with?

    • @DanDownunda8888
      @DanDownunda8888 3 года назад +1

      Yes William, there are now......NZ! We should secede immediately!

  • @user-pe2mf5tg3h
    @user-pe2mf5tg3h 3 года назад +2

    This might be the best one (bar the front fell off)

  • @Aymiikeeganmelb
    @Aymiikeeganmelb 10 лет назад +3

    STRAYA !!

  • @totalgej
    @totalgej 2 года назад +1

    funny that this is relevant again :)

  • @maximmatkovsky6490
    @maximmatkovsky6490 3 года назад +1

    Just googled this, price estimate went up to 89Billion Australian dollars. Isnt that 4500 per citizen? For something you would not see at sea...

    • @galliman123
      @galliman123 3 года назад +1

      Yep, sub brief has a great video how we got rorted

  • @Virtue740097
    @Virtue740097 10 лет назад +1

    I like it!

  • @peaceleader7315
    @peaceleader7315 Год назад

    God knows who owns the Australian submarines building industry 🙏..🤣😂😅

  • @TheSunergizer
    @TheSunergizer 10 лет назад +3

    How about Aussie government to be outsourced.

  • @Zenziba95
    @Zenziba95 10 лет назад +91

    I'd rather have 40 billion spent on the nbn rather than a few submarines

    • @Tjousk
      @Tjousk 10 лет назад +5

      Indeed.

    • @acomputer121
      @acomputer121 10 лет назад +13

      Or fucking healthcare, education, infrastructure, jesus, there are a lot of things which that 40 billion could be spent on other than submarines which we will most likely never use. That being said, in terms of recent defence spending, this is more sensible than the many billions we spent on the F-35's, considering the hornets still function perfectly well (despite their age). I say it is more sensible, because, for a vessel designed for stealth, you'd rather it not be described as an underwater lawn mower, as the current Collins Class subs have been.

    • @timliebrockpuzzles
      @timliebrockpuzzles 8 лет назад +2

      The total development of the F35 came to right around 1 trillion dollars. They consistantly got shit on by F16 in dogfights. There was a computer simulation of, I think it was 5-6 F35's, and against 5-6 of China's planes over the South China Sea and 1 F35 came back.

    • @lukebaker18
      @lukebaker18 5 лет назад +1

      It seems you’ve got both

    • @mickmorrissey16
      @mickmorrissey16 4 года назад +6

      Trouble is with the threat for China if we don’t have a defence capability, one day you won’t have a choice in what you want or rather have.

  • @alexandermccarthy
    @alexandermccarthy 3 года назад +3

    At some point am I supposed to cry with happiness or sadness, or just accept that satire was/is the basis for all LNP policy decisions?

    • @criddlegakes2650
      @criddlegakes2650 2 года назад +1

      Satire is the basis for ALP decisions too, they're just never in power long enough for anyone to make fun of them

  • @philippa5004
    @philippa5004 3 года назад

    🤣😂👏👏⭐️

  • @takepartlive
    @takepartlive 10 лет назад +2

    Peeps really should vote in every election!

  • @Tim_3100
    @Tim_3100 2 года назад +1

    Funny but so true most countries outsource something whether its subs, nuclear power plants etc

  • @yanivyaffe
    @yanivyaffe 2 года назад

    True

  • @non-human3072
    @non-human3072 Год назад

    Lol 8 years ago and its happening again

  • @gikku3
    @gikku3 10 лет назад +3

    I wish City Rail or TfNSW would buy Japanese trains...

    • @thedrunkenelf
      @thedrunkenelf Год назад

      NSW have just replaced all their state trains with Korean Hyundai brand trains. That’s pretty good.

  • @rogermail7060
    @rogermail7060 Год назад

    If you can check him out playing the role of Fred Dagg

  • @baalqefel1570
    @baalqefel1570 Год назад

    Id actually feel better knowing that voting had been outsourced.
    ....i wouldnt be left thinking im living with a bunch of dim lights everytime the circus comes to town

  • @FluffyPetal84
    @FluffyPetal84 2 года назад +2

    John would be rolling in his grave right now!

  • @108Marycelestial
    @108Marycelestial 3 года назад

    Rip

  • @outthere9370
    @outthere9370 Год назад

    Poor Ockers! Conned once again! Yr mates, the Yanks, have pulled the sheep's wool over yr heads, yet again! 🤣😂🤣😂
    $40,000,000,0000!!! Hello. Is there anybody home? 😳

  • @Lieu3C4
    @Lieu3C4 10 лет назад +8

    Joe Hockey's strategy for drought prevention: wait for it to rain so the farmers can pay tax again.

  • @hvacdesignsolutions
    @hvacdesignsolutions 3 года назад +1

    Outsourcing voting...🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @Tyras612
    @Tyras612 10 лет назад

    ye

  • @invisibilianone6288
    @invisibilianone6288 7 месяцев назад

    🎯even funnier, these days

  • @TheNakedWombat
    @TheNakedWombat 10 лет назад +3

    Right on the money. People don't seem to notice just how dangerous this Government is.

  • @scoutjohnson1803
    @scoutjohnson1803 3 года назад

    I don’t hear billionaires complaining spending billions on building subs.

  • @jaykyu1
    @jaykyu1 10 лет назад +4

    Aussie built subs emit detectable noise. It also gives a feeling underwater of being too close to the turf. I knew that 2-stroke engine wasn't a very good idea.

    • @adoreslaurel
      @adoreslaurel 3 года назад +3

      Bugger, is that where the motor of me ol' Victa finished up.

    • @markward2824
      @markward2824 3 года назад

      Know what you’re talking about?

    • @jaykyu1
      @jaykyu1 3 года назад

      @@markward2824 Can you say your point then bugger off?

    • @JohnJ469
      @JohnJ469 3 года назад

      @@jaykyu1 The point is that if "Aussie built subs emit detectable noise." then why can't the other navies hear them?

    • @jaykyu1
      @jaykyu1 3 года назад

      @@JohnJ469 Other navies don't hear them because their sonar device is for finding fish.

  • @younes2415
    @younes2415 3 года назад

    Lol, Australian government just shredded the French contract to build new submarines, instead the Australian government stabbed the French in the back and took a British/US nuclear power submarine... YEAH EXPENSIVE Rules!??

  • @mahmed1705
    @mahmed1705 3 года назад +1

    SAME FUCKING STORY IN EVERY COUNTRY...

  • @gm3801
    @gm3801 3 года назад

    Too many boring and incessantly repetitive RUclips ads in your videos. We should all complain to RUclips.

  • @victorblakey4260
    @victorblakey4260 Год назад

    So, the Japanese submarines became French submarines, but they had to alter the design because we weren’t going to have nuclear submarines, so the French nuclear submarines had to be modified so that they were no longer nuclear. Then we abandoned the whole thing , paid the french a lot of money for not letting them build our submarines because we are going to buy nuclear submarines from the English …
    Or maybe we will buy them from the Americans …

  • @velcroman11
    @velcroman11 Год назад

    Yeh, out souring is so good. Just look at the new ferries, trains, trams. We pay THROUGH THE NOSE for them. Then, PAY THROUGH THE NOSE “A G A I N!” to fix them so that we can actually use them. “Out sourcing” what a wonderful way to burn Australian’s tax dollars producing nothing but Co2.

  • @ianwallace16
    @ianwallace16 3 года назад

    Typical politician answers.😂

    • @Heisthelightoftheworld
      @Heisthelightoftheworld 3 года назад

      Funny I thought it already has been, or is run by overseas interests.

  • @2403rygar
    @2403rygar 2 года назад

    We outsourced our election....

  • @rosewood1
    @rosewood1 3 года назад

    Well we cannot even build a canoe here... it would seem that the French are not good canoe builders either... such a balls up from the beginning perhaps we should outsource to the Chinese! Oh we did and don't like their canoes either...

  • @spoddie
    @spoddie 3 года назад

    40 billion dollars is no 80 billion dollars.
    we could buy US nuke subs for 3 billion each

    • @galliman123
      @galliman123 3 года назад

      The seawolfs are cheaper at this point its insane

    • @zachb1706
      @zachb1706 3 года назад

      The whole reasoning for the high costs is that no diesel submarine that was offered lived up to the requirements of the military…
      Then don’t go with fucking diesel!

  • @rabbitspliff
    @rabbitspliff 10 лет назад +5

    1:26
    This. This buzzword/buzzphrase and variations of it. "We're living in a globalised economy".
    Kill it with fire. There's nothing "one love", "pluralist" or "multicultural" about it. It's just big business in cahoots with national governments to expand their monopoly, pay people as little as possible, and maximise profits.