Scalp EG : India’s Invisible Missile for Chinese (With Rafale of IAF)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 179

  • @asmodeus3084
    @asmodeus3084 Год назад +37

    Brohmos has a capabilities like 90° dive, can fly as low as 15m. Better speed and we have seen the maneuvering in last test in mia channu.
    This may be cheaper option.

  • @souvikdey6648
    @souvikdey6648 10 месяцев назад +1

    INDIA should also develop Indeginous stealth long range missile sike scalp or american lrsam

  • @ap8672
    @ap8672 Год назад +2

    Russia has captured the missile in intact form

  • @arunsharma885
    @arunsharma885 Год назад +12

    The problem with IAF is too many systems in too less quantities.
    also factoring how much such systems are lost due to enemy actions.
    Our DPSU babus cannot even produce dump bombs and non-smart ammunitions at a warlike scale, let alone producing enough quantities of smart munitions.

    • @alpha88max
      @alpha88max Год назад +1

      Less varity of weapons for the same work less supply chain & logistics problems. Economies of scale work better than randomly chosing weapons like big bazaar sale...

  • @Value_Pilgrim
    @Value_Pilgrim Год назад +3

    Better that India buys or makes its own Shahed 136 kind of kamikaze drones in very large numbers.
    To target bunkers and fortifications use Thermobaric warheads.

    • @Shivam-kz2dg
      @Shivam-kz2dg Год назад

      Harop drones ? We already have them

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +1

      You have over two dozen loitering munitions (either inducted or on offer)

    • @Value_Pilgrim
      @Value_Pilgrim Год назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi India should have loitering drones with the following characteristics:
      1. 100% indigenous. All parts should be manufactured in India with 100% IP ownership.
      2. It should be super cheap so that India can manufacture literally 5-10,000 of these for saturation type of attacks.
      3. They should fly at an altitude where they can’t be intercepted by small arms or ManPads and carry a warhead enough to cause genuine devastation.
      4. Have a range of about 1000-1500 kms, be trustworthy and precise as well as have swarm intelligence capabilities to go autonomous when needed (or in EW / denial scenarios).
      Something like that in large enough numbers will be a fantastic deterrent even in the event of a 2 front war.

  • @kaho6891-
    @kaho6891- Год назад +10

    Interesting point. I read an report in eurasiantimes about why not to depend on it.
    Ukraine War: Why Indian Air Force Should Be Worried By The “Failure” Of British Storm Shadow Missiles

    • @amjadsk.2469
      @amjadsk.2469 Год назад +4

      Propaganda machinery 😂
      Same news agency is spreading a misconception that GE deal derailed India's jet engine programme & they given timeframe of year 2100. Till that time India will have to depend on foreign engines.

    • @prakxyz
      @prakxyz Год назад +1

      Eurasiantimes post Russian propaganda. Don't read their opinions

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад +2

      You are right. Russia ne 6-7 scalp shoot down Kia he. Syria me bohot time pehle bhi shoot down Kia he, it's not big thing. Hypersonic kingel missile bhi ab to shoot down ho gai, ye to fir bhi subsonic hai

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER Год назад

      @@freeclass2859 no knzal is shoot down nato propganda hai sab kinzal se patroit uda diya

  • @anoopmadhavan0
    @anoopmadhavan0 Год назад +4

    Russia shot down a large number of storm shadow Missiles , it's very difficult for Scalp to penetrate the layered airdefence of China. Whatever it's depends on how we use it, using the holes in AD coverage we can do better.

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад +1

      Vhi to baat he, scalp itni intercept ho chuki he or ye usko invincible bta rha he.

  • @mandalindranil
    @mandalindranil Год назад +48

    India has the advantage here over China...Has India developed Terrain hugging and mapping tech ?

    • @Gaurav90065
      @Gaurav90065 Год назад +14

      Aa gaya gyani 😂

    • @dkq986
      @dkq986 Год назад +17

      @@Gaurav90065tu bharat mata ki jaay bol zor zor se... wahi kafi h Chinese se jeet dilane k liye...

    • @deepmadhav
      @deepmadhav Год назад

      Are you a fool or a blind person I am saying this because you have seen a lot of test video and also explanatory video about brahmos missile but still you ask such silly questions

    • @vikasmallick2298
      @vikasmallick2298 Год назад +9

      ​@@dkq986😂😂😂

    • @an_gaming4883
      @an_gaming4883 Год назад +11

      Geography india ko help krti h aur defending country has an advantage over attacking just see how ukraine who is not even considered a good military power is holding against Russia.

  • @theexaminer4784
    @theexaminer4784 Год назад +1

    Only 30 squadrons remained and not all in operational capabilites when we need atleast 42.

  • @smartbaba1321
    @smartbaba1321 Год назад +1

    Missile chahe kitni bhi achi ho, hai to foreigner hi..

  • @rohitkamble9619
    @rohitkamble9619 Год назад +1

    Metallurgy is too crucial for Artillery manufacturing

  • @indianlovingreaction4000yout
    @indianlovingreaction4000yout Год назад

    Bahut hi achhi news Iaf aur bharat ki suraksha ke liye. 👉👉🤗🤗❤️💞💪👉👉🤗🤗❤️💞💪💪🤗🤗❤️💞💪👉👉🤗🤗❤️💞💪💪🤗🤗❤️💞💪🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @kumaramarkant3695
    @kumaramarkant3695 Год назад +2

    We should be self-reliant in field of defense. We should develop scalp like missile rather than import scalp missile. Indian missiles are not far behind western missiles

    • @wankmaster69
      @wankmaster69 Год назад

      Our missiles are sumwhate better than west in many ways

  • @indiandefensearena905
    @indiandefensearena905 Год назад +1

    India will take more decades to achieve such missiles right now we are still struggling with nirbhaya type conventional long range cruise missiles 😅

  • @shubhanshusingh5149
    @shubhanshusingh5149 Год назад +1

    Itni invisible ki kisi bhi nhi dikhayi deti 😅😅

  • @rakesh9918
    @rakesh9918 Год назад +1

    India should increase Research and Development in Defense sector to face China and Pakistan together in a war

  • @nishpakshagupta8331
    @nishpakshagupta8331 Год назад +1

    Bro Russians have shot down storm shadows, I have seen the photos of downed Storm shadow's

  • @RichardBrett899
    @RichardBrett899 Год назад

    I don't want to laugh, but I can't help it! 😂😅😂😅🤣🤪😜😛

  • @shalinmodi6748
    @shalinmodi6748 Год назад

    If india's ws10 moment goes perfect, it will have even more compact than GE engine deal......

  • @amanrajpoot3706
    @amanrajpoot3706 Год назад

    Great , 100% agree

  • @akashvinod4045
    @akashvinod4045 Год назад

    Badiya India bhut majboot defence systems use karkas china ko jawab de Raha he

  • @Space_Odyssey37
    @Space_Odyssey37 Год назад +1

    इसका मतलब चीन के पिछवाड़े में इस मिसाइल से अधिक दर्द हो सकता है।

  • @sathishchetty
    @sathishchetty Год назад

    China has advantage of large scale production
    and ability to push it's soldiers as dictators.
    India has advantage of experienced professional army , geography reliable war machinery the former might look scary but when agitated Chinese cannot stand a chance.

  • @kunalsinha2355
    @kunalsinha2355 Год назад +2

    Jai hind🇮🇳

  • @iimcrandomgamer711
    @iimcrandomgamer711 Год назад +1

    Sir can we develop stealth subsonic cruise missel on the base of nirbhay missel.

  • @Iinshort99
    @Iinshort99 Год назад +1

    India needs long range cruse missile

  • @finderskeepers7293
    @finderskeepers7293 Год назад +5

    Is it true that although the Stormshadow and Scalp are essentially the same missile, yet the Stormshadow carries a heavier warhead than the French version Scalp?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +3

      Storm Shadow is the British name for the weapon; in French service it is called SCALP EG (Emploi Général, meaning General Purpose)

    • @finderskeepers7293
      @finderskeepers7293 Год назад +2

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi My question is, although they are the same systems essentially, does the British Version carry a bigger warhead than the French Variant?
      This is because I heard something to that effect recently in a online discussion.

    • @kevinjaitejmontbose5377
      @kevinjaitejmontbose5377 Год назад +3

      It depends on the range you want. The longer the range, the smaller the warhead.

  • @amarjeetbadhani3616
    @amarjeetbadhani3616 Год назад

    JAI HIND 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳

  • @dev.n1257
    @dev.n1257 Год назад +1

    Pantsir ya jo bhi ye Russia ka air defence system hain ye itna capable nahi hain, ye pahle bhi fail hua hain, agar s400 ko beat karde scalp missile, tab kuch BAAT Bane.🤔🤔🤔

  • @muktiprateekdas9769
    @muktiprateekdas9769 Год назад +1

    Truely invisible missile because it doesnt exist

  • @Therabbit2210
    @Therabbit2210 Год назад

    But sourabh what is raad missile ? is that a capable or stand in competition ?

  • @ankitroy6829
    @ankitroy6829 Год назад

    What about nirbhay cruise missile?

  • @rajendrapatil1147
    @rajendrapatil1147 Год назад

    China and Pakistan have deployment of Nuclear Howitzer guns on LAC and LOC respectively.
    India needs to counter this offensive
    on first priority.

  • @knightheart3482
    @knightheart3482 Год назад +3

    What happened to nirbhay missile system ?

    • @Rakesh4809
      @Rakesh4809 Год назад

      Ye Baniya mentality is unfit to design, innovate and manufacture nor is capable to take risks.

    • @Shivam-kz2dg
      @Shivam-kz2dg Год назад

      We need subsonic engines . Nirbhay is 100% with Russian engine and the project has achieved parameters so , project closed. Now focusing on engine for it

    • @AemondTomahawk
      @AemondTomahawk Год назад

      Indian Manek engine integration going on.

  • @dtk7728
    @dtk7728 Год назад

    Indian version of scalp ka kya hua...

  • @TTT-uk3cn
    @TTT-uk3cn Год назад +9

    Perhaps the way to detect such stealth missiles is by having a system to detect the heat emittion of fuel burning.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +5

      EO

    • @TTT-uk3cn
      @TTT-uk3cn Год назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi then what else is the way to detect?

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад

      @@TTT-uk3cn bhai multiple scalp shoot down Kia jhe Russia ne and Syria me bhi scalp intercept Kia the. Inko detect Krna is not rocket science

    • @shubhampreetsingh8630
      @shubhampreetsingh8630 Год назад

      Well I don't think heat detection will work on turbofan

    • @alexjamie4903
      @alexjamie4903 Год назад

      I don't think see I m not underestimating 😂😂 China but yes Chinese weapons are even cheap copy of Russian weapons . See it's not a weapon that are used few are just made for treaten other coz there use can cause massacre. . So we must be prepared and I think when we consider China we must used all kind of blocked weapons like cluster strikes and also bio weapons.

  • @maitreyatherailfan
    @maitreyatherailfan Год назад

    Cats hunter ko scalp se compair kar sakate hai

  • @debasishkashyap-cv5ot
    @debasishkashyap-cv5ot Год назад

    Hello alpha, what is the update about cats hunter...

  • @bluedevil8426
    @bluedevil8426 Год назад +4

    jab pantsir ne use track hi nhi kar paya to fir isne 2-2 missiles fire kaise kar die.?🙄

    • @asmodeus3084
      @asmodeus3084 Год назад +2

      L-band frequency use kar k, but missile may have been invisible in X-band which is generally used for precision.

    • @Kkyy0077
      @Kkyy0077 Год назад

      Did you even watch the video? He clearly says initially the system couldn't detect it and by the time it could it was already very close. Then it fired two missiles which couldn't intercept it.

  • @DailyLifeSolution
    @DailyLifeSolution Год назад

    कॅरी करनाको हिंदीमे ढोना कहते है। कृपया चलचित्रमे हिंदीका अनुपात बढाये।

  • @rawatsanjaysingh09
    @rawatsanjaysingh09 Год назад

    Atleast should do dummy bunker destruction.

  • @ZARDSOMSHARMA
    @ZARDSOMSHARMA Год назад

    Excellent. Keep it up

  • @pankajanandadas3260
    @pankajanandadas3260 Год назад

    Jai hind

  • @amanverma-ml1fv
    @amanverma-ml1fv Год назад

    Truly loved it

  • @james4807M
    @james4807M Год назад

    We have all technology to develop desi SCALP-EG. Most of nirbhays technology can be transferred in this project.

  • @manojkumar-jw5jc
    @manojkumar-jw5jc Год назад

    wars wil be won by missiles ATGM, not fighters of IAC , all can be pulverised by smart missiles , convoys can be taken out , infra can be hit what will u do with tanks and fighters all airfields can be taken out in first wave

  • @ssharma2957
    @ssharma2957 Год назад

    ...besides all the advancements, one sure factor is...low quality of Chinese weapon systems...

  • @subratagautam7041
    @subratagautam7041 Год назад

    Iska cost ,brahmos ka 1/3Rd hai.

  • @nishantshrivastava9674
    @nishantshrivastava9674 Год назад +1

    Inn babus k bas ka nhi.. Nirbhay 20 saal se bn hi rha h.. 2 4 limited series k missiles LAC pe deployed h dikhane k liye.
    Series production me nhi jaane wale.. Technical glitch se bhare honge..

    • @biswajitmajumder9922
      @biswajitmajumder9922 Год назад +1

      Information nirbhay all ready series production pe chala gaya hai 2022 ma . Tum kis duniya ma para ho😂

  • @pravijay1
    @pravijay1 Год назад

    India is 5 years behind China in electronics and missiles system. Please mention this in your comments.

  • @subhaghosh3529
    @subhaghosh3529 Год назад

    Jai Hind 🇮🇳

  • @Pranith_
    @Pranith_ Год назад

    That's why ACM B S Dhanoa said Rafale is best fighter in Tibet region.

  • @hammirsinghrathore9499
    @hammirsinghrathore9499 Год назад

    If our brahmos missile becomes stealthy then it truly become invisible in terms of speed , stealthy coating and accurate

  • @Yeolejayesh
    @Yeolejayesh Год назад

    charles de gaulle aircraft carrier Develped India & France

  • @Golu03203
    @Golu03203 Год назад +2

    Sir please compair these
    Jf 17 thunder b2/3 vs HLFT 42 fighter vs F16 CD please please please please please 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏.
    Sir ap conflict X me hi ye kar dihiye.
    Your true Fan ❤️❤️❤️

    • @asmodeus3084
      @asmodeus3084 Год назад +1

      HLFT 42 will have big ass rcs because of all metal body. It is being developed for export as trainer jet which can also fight.

    • @Golu03203
      @Golu03203 Год назад +1

      @@asmodeus3084 but some RUclips video's i have seen that HAL will make a fighter variant of this with composite material.

    • @asmodeus3084
      @asmodeus3084 Год назад +1

      ​@@Golu03203 but we already have that variant -Tejas mark 2. did that youtube video reveal the source?

    • @Shivam-kz2dg
      @Shivam-kz2dg Год назад

      ​​@@Golu03203he only point of developing HLFT 42 is cost cutting. Then why the hell will HAL invest more money and make an expensive composite version of it as we already have Tejas? Will be so worthless of it

    • @Golu03203
      @Golu03203 Год назад +1

      Yes you are right. I am also thinking about that. I am satisfied by your answers . thank you guys.

  • @bhagatsinghsankhala6272
    @bhagatsinghsankhala6272 Год назад +1

    दलाल वाली भूमिका न निभाएँ।

  • @amjadsk.2469
    @amjadsk.2469 Год назад

    Bro, one of variants of Brahmos comes with steep dive capability which was designed specially for himalayan terrain. So, don't spread misconception about Brahmos missile.
    Cost is the only point where I agree. India need a subsonic cruise missile .

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +4

      Not true ! Steep dive and steering through mountains are two different things

    • @debalik8806
      @debalik8806 Год назад +1

      Totally wrong. Terrain-Hugging/Sea-Skimming capability is different from Steep Dive capability. Steep Dive is helpful for shortening the Engagement window of the Enemy Air Defense Systems but Steep Dive cannot delay the detection of the missile which is the most important thing. There's a reason why Low Observable (LO) Cruise Missiles like AGM-158B JASSM, AGM-158C LRASM & Storm Shadow are far more difficult to Detect, let alone Intercept, compared to something like P-800M Oniks or BrahMos which can be easily detected by AWACS & shot down by Air-Air Missiles or Surface to Air Missiles.

  • @omprakashverma2336
    @omprakashverma2336 Год назад

    🙏 Jay hind 🇮🇳

  • @charnjitsingh5595
    @charnjitsingh5595 Год назад

    Jay. Hind

  • @saqidkhan146
    @saqidkhan146 Год назад

    It is mean that India have no confidence upon local made brahmose and narby cruise missile

  • @adisharma1556
    @adisharma1556 Год назад

    IAF should integrate scalp missiles in jaguars

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад

      Jaguar ke engine to pehle hi under power he.

  • @kameshkumarnaik7942
    @kameshkumarnaik7942 Год назад

    CONGRESS SECRET SCIENTIST MADE THIS 💪🏻 AGLIBAR CONGRESS SARKAR 💪🏻

  • @ramakrishnagogineni5924
    @ramakrishnagogineni5924 Год назад +1

    🙏🙏🌼🌼

  • @sriramv3786
    @sriramv3786 Год назад +1

    Invincibility is a myth... Hence, the title is misleading

    • @shadow_edits03
      @shadow_edits03 Год назад

      Its not a myth understand the terminology

    • @sriramv3786
      @sriramv3786 Год назад

      @@shadow_edits03 Well if someone or something were to be invinsable, then everyone would be using only that weapon system and not any other with a sure shot probability of victory. That is not the case how wars are fought... To term a weapon system as invincible represents a flawed understanding of the facts on the ground. There are various factors that makes a weapon system prevail or fail on the battlefield. However, winning the war is the real deal... Invincible weapons or not!! We should dispassionately state that one weapon system has done better than the other rather than stating that one weapon system is invincible. Hope this clarifies...

    • @shadow_edits03
      @shadow_edits03 Год назад

      @@sriramv3786 it that there weapons are invincible against Russian panzer .. they will be intercepted by American or isrilie air defences but here we are only consulting Russian if they can't intersept it they are invisible

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад +1

      Exactly and but people still believe blindly and doesn't want to listen reality, bcz reality is not matching with people conception. So youtuber delivered the the article towards what people happy to hear 🤣🤣🤣

  • @saurabhdang7307
    @saurabhdang7307 Год назад

    Why don't we make a desi version.

  • @gauravparashar5152
    @gauravparashar5152 Год назад

    Alpha defense invisible news

  • @sanjeetsingh5999
    @sanjeetsingh5999 Год назад +2

    Bhai india bhi ise traha ka missile bana raha tha na?

  • @lokmaankunwar4330
    @lokmaankunwar4330 Год назад

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @akshaygade8758
    @akshaygade8758 Год назад

    Does It Possible To Make A Cruise Missile Which Can Fly At Super Sonic Or Hyper Sonic Speeds With Heavy Manoeuvres ???

    • @james4807M
      @james4807M Год назад

      Brahmos have end game manoeuvres but Russian hypersonic missiles uses decoys to distract radars of surface to air missiles.

    • @AaoKuchDikhae
      @AaoKuchDikhae Год назад

      Shaurya missle

  • @YNS-v5n
    @YNS-v5n Год назад

    Video banane wale bhai sahab ki mentality Deshbhakt jisi nahin lag Rahi kyunki lag Rahi hoti to ye sochte ki brahmos ko truck per lagaenge kya? aur rudram?😂😂😂😂😂

  • @coolkal7590
    @coolkal7590 Год назад

    All subsonics need to be stealthy else useless

  • @Red.bulldozer3
    @Red.bulldozer3 Год назад

    Many of indian weapons are invisible to chinese because most of them still in drawing board, prototype,in the pipeline, future weapons,trial stages 😂

  • @VishalY1387
    @VishalY1387 Год назад

    Can India develop it's own scalp when we do have availability of technology.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +2

      We can ! However we are more focused on tomahawk category at this moment

    • @AemondTomahawk
      @AemondTomahawk Год назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi what the interception probability of scalp vs Tomahawk ( our Nirbhay) ??

    • @debalik8806
      @debalik8806 Год назад +1

      @@AemondTomahawk Scalp-EG or Storm Shadow Missiles are Low Observable (LO) Cruise Missiles with the RCS of a Golf ball( -30 dBsm or 0.001 m^2) - same as that of an F-35.
      The Tomahawk is a Normal Cruise Missile with a large RCS ( 0.1 - 1m^2). Moreover, They don't have any Radar Absorbing Material (RAM) coatings - So they will be detected at far greater ranges.
      For example, The E-3G Sentry AWACS, equipped with a GaN AESA Radar, has a 520 Km Detection & Tracking range against 1m^2 Targets - So a Tomahawk Missile would be detected at Hundreds of km away even in a Heavily contested, Jammed Airspace. The AGM-158B JASSM or Storm Shadow would be detected at Tens of Km away in the same Airspace. So Stealth LACMs/AShMs always enjoy a great advantage in detection range.

  • @alpha88max
    @alpha88max Год назад

    Hope it will not be too invisible so that we can't see it getting deployed in our lifetime
    😂😂

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  Год назад +2

      Bhai basic engineering is prerequisite here.. we are talking in context of radio visibility and Scalp EG is already deployed on indin Rafales

    • @alpha88max
      @alpha88max Год назад

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi
      I know brother I m just saying it on a lighter note. Considering all the delays we have seen in induction when it comes to Army and Air force, this much of gaffe is non-offensive.

    • @DESIBOY-fe7nm
      @DESIBOY-fe7nm Год назад

      DRDO:- Chill, I'll make sure that it's not invisible to *anyone.* 😇

  • @EXPLORADVEN
    @EXPLORADVEN Год назад

    👊👊👊👊

  • @ayush8951
    @ayush8951 Год назад

    I think India buy this weapon and use reverse engineering 🤔 too make a new and powerful missile China also do that also 😮

  • @cundisamson125
    @cundisamson125 Год назад

    Pakistan and China already received Indian defense technical documents related to Agnini 6 by honey trapping bleddy Indian scientist pradeep kulkarni nw what's the use

  • @supremeleader5516
    @supremeleader5516 Год назад +1

    Russia shot many of these

  • @jishusingh8361
    @jishusingh8361 Год назад

    (Singular) Incident ko Incidence kyo bolte rehte ho? Plz mat karo, plz, no hate, lekin plz.

  • @flightengineer1990
    @flightengineer1990 Год назад +1

    Bhai kuch to logic daal diya kar video mein! 😂. Ukraine ko bohot sare western equipment nahi mil rahe hain, un logon ko bas ginti ke systems mil rahe hain. Russia ke paas sab kuch hote hue bhi kuch nahi kar pa raha hai 😂.

  • @riyanayom3388
    @riyanayom3388 Год назад

    Indian army and the IAF should not allow the u tubers to bark all details of their weapons systems on media.This is greatest weakness of India.Atleast we should maintain some secret.

  • @Aksyvchaudhari
    @Aksyvchaudhari Год назад

    Russia kai baar Strom shadow missile ko down krr chuka hai ye koi game changer missile system nahi hai😂

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад

      But public ye baat sunne ko tyar nhi to to video banane wala bhi kya kre. Bcz hamne ye missile purchase ki he that's why ye invincible hi he🤣

    • @debalik8806
      @debalik8806 Год назад +1

      Russia is shooting down everything from last year & still losing land in every province. Where is the Wreckage of the Intercepted missile ??

  • @freeclass2859
    @freeclass2859 Год назад +2

    Kyu bhole logo ka bewkoof bna rhe ho. Pehle hi janta andbhakt bun chuki he. Media bhi godi ho chuka he . Ab tum bhi yhi kam krne lge. 6-7 Scalp ko shoot down Kia he Russia ne. Syria me jab usa, uk, France ne airstrike Kia the tab bhi kafi tomahawk and scalp ko shoot down Kia tha

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад +1

      Wreckage bhi dikaya tha Syria and Russia me scalp ka. Khud uk, France ne ye claim Kia k majority of missile ne hit Kia, they don't claim all missile hit without intersept

    • @freeclass2859
      @freeclass2859 Год назад

      Jab Syria me Scalp se bombing ki thi to multiple missile fire Kia the target pe, bcz they know that most of them intersepted.

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER Год назад

      @@freeclass2859 wahi to ye normal cruise missile ko chane ki jhaad bta raha hai russia china ke layred SAM har roj ise shoot down karte ukrIn me pahle syria me

  • @domonkor7667
    @domonkor7667 Год назад

    Ye bhai sahab assumptions accha batate hain. China rok nhi payega. Russia se leke banaya. Russia se leke khud jesse unhone koi research and development kiya hi nhi hoga uske upar.
    Itna safai se jhoot bolo ki sach aur jhoot main differences hi naa rahe.

  • @Godofwar-fw1lu
    @Godofwar-fw1lu Год назад

    Ghisee pitee western thinking 🤔😜🤪😁😂

  • @GTFO_0
    @GTFO_0 Год назад

    First make toilet😂😂

  • @prannoypatel
    @prannoypatel Год назад +1

    FIRST!!!

  • @nipunsharma4164
    @nipunsharma4164 Год назад

    🙋🏻

  • @abirbo
    @abirbo Год назад

    Chinese Air Force already has such a missile called AKF 98A. It's similar to Storm Shadow/SCALP.

  • @granand
    @granand Год назад

    these kind of nonsensical exaggerations lead to China kicking our ass. Just see progress and technology china has. what is the point of this provocation ?

  • @wiswaskumar1775
    @wiswaskumar1775 Год назад

    Numbers....numbers.....only 36 rafale 😢

  • @shermuhammad9004
    @shermuhammad9004 Год назад +1

    Aisa missile har 3 din baad china mein tyar hota h

    • @clintwestwood5187
      @clintwestwood5187 Год назад +8

      Arre mian aapke abba cheen sabse tagde hain....wahi aapko bachayega.

    • @avi5705
      @avi5705 Год назад +8

      Ye madressa chap is saying..........."maro koi muje maro"

    • @Rakesh4809
      @Rakesh4809 Год назад +2

      Apni baat kar Cheen se kya lena dena,Cheen tumhe pailne ke liye hai na ki madad ke liye hai. Haye madrasa.

    • @selfenquiry456
      @selfenquiry456 Год назад

      Murkh madrasachapri china tume apna khilona bana ke rakha hai, Western product ke samne Chinese product loda hai 👎

  • @paragchandra8219
    @paragchandra8219 Год назад

    Pentasir Russia ka advanced system to hai but China ke bare me apki baat galat hai bhai Chine je pas Sasta Pentasir hai matlab downgraded varient....nakal maar kr aap kabhi bhi asli se achha system nahi banaa saktey jab tak aap Japanese nahi ho......😂😂😂

  • @lovejesus1913
    @lovejesus1913 Год назад

    पहले भारत के अंदर जो इस्लामिक मिसाइल है उसकी चिंता करो, हम मौत के कगार पर बैठे हैं मौलाना मोदी के नेतृत्व में।😢