he wasnt even this good as Nordberg in Naked Gun. and he can be calm because at this point he couldnt get in trouble anyways. good ole double jeopardy law.
OJ totally contradicts himself in this interview. The shoes. He says he would never wear Bruno Maglis. Then he goes on to say that most people don't even know the name of their shoes, and that he had upwards of 40 pairs of shoes. If he had 40 plus pairs of shoes and can't know the name of all of the shoes how can he say he has never worn Bruno Maglis?
MARK A HEY IDIOT, if you want to see a joke and contradiction and pure fables, watch the prosecution, marcia clark was so inept she couldn't even win with framed evidence, shows you there is a god, and evil gets checked
JHOT 247 nah man. The prosecution made mistakes but let’s be real about this. The only reason he got off was because of Mark furhmans racism and ultimately pleading the fifth to not further damage his character. There’s no way the entire lapd conspired to get OJ because if indeed it was someone else who committed this crime, why then frame OJ when you have the supposed “actual” evidence from the real killers at the scene. Why say, let’s get rid of the evidence left by the real killer to frame OJ. Makes no sense considering OJ had a great relationship with the cops. Nah man, he did this crime. No question about it.
Do you believe that a black man doesn't know what kind of fucking shoes that he wears? Get the FUCK OUTTA HEYA! I'm creole...half black, and half white, and that's some bullshit.
Absolutely incredible....never come across anything like it....what exactly did he have to do to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed serial murder? Were they expecting to see a photo of him next to the victims with the murder weapon? Unbelievable!
@@Viewer820 He could have pleaded guilty in court and the jury still would have found him not guilty because it was a backlash to the police brutality.
Those were not HIS words. Just bcoz they made Cuba say it doesn’t mean OJ said it. Those were were never spoken by the real OJ. It’s a shame that so many people are so much misinformed & brainwashed.
The fascinating thing is that he transcends narcissism. Usually narcissists will eventually reveal themselves or lash out when pressured over time. He doesn't. He just keeps on going, ice cold machine.
@Jesse Hernandez I'm not sure if it's 30 photos but it wouldn't surprise me. He wore them often, so when he says he doesn't because they're ugly is just one of countless examples of pathological lying. He has an answer for everything but every answer is bullshit. He does it over and over and doesn't realize it's painfully obvious that he isn't smarter than everyone else in the room. If he was he'd shut his damn mouth, but an egomanic narcissist just can't get it through their skull.
The soles used in those shoes are used for other brands too. & they never found that particular make in his wardrobe, nor does the pictures prove which brand they are. In fact nobody who were authorised to sell those shoes came forward & said they sold him those shoes. Everyone they asked denied having sold any to him. As usual people falling for all the media garbage 🥺
@@PhenomenalDiva In the Civil Trial he was caught red handed in the shoes and asked about it in his deposition and his reaction said it all... Please GTFOH. Nobody in 2024 believes OJ is innocent lol
"NO one sold me those kind of shoes!! I would never wear those ugly shoes!!!!!" LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! A picture then surfaced of him at a football game wearing them on the side lines while reporting.
They were possibly doctored as the game weather calls fro rain and it is sold out. When you look at the photos the sun is out no crowd in the stadium . They have never found the shoes, clothes, or knife / knives
@@garrickgregory6403 those pics were published in a Buffalo Bills newsletter many months prior to the murders. no need to doctor them before the murders happened.
@@markmac2206 these photos showed up two years later . Where is the contact sheet if the whole game . Plus the weather conditions of the game call for rain and wind .
@@TanjiTuesday they were found two years later and never found any receipt to these shoes as the FBI had a copy of every shoe Simpson owned. No Bruno Magli were ever found. Also there was another shoe at the crime scene on the envelope containing the sunglasses and the jeans on Goldman. The actual game is on RUclips where these supposed pictures were taken . September 26, 1993 Bills vs Dolphins as the game is sold out , rain and wind conditions compared to the photos showing a sunny day . Fraudulent Photos given a pass just get a victory in Civil Court
OJ: That wasn't my blood I spilled some Kool-aid, man. OJ: My limo driver didn't see me, he lied. OJ: I didn't kill anyone, they just ran into my knife.
Even in the bronco chase, he was just busy telling the officer on the phone how great he was. How he just loved everybody, how he just wanted to get to Nicole's grave and be with her.. I guess that why he had a fake mustache a goe-t and $9,000 in cash on him. It has always been me, me, me. I think that is why in these interviews he is so bold, he has felt like a God for so long he actually has come to believe it here. Thankfully the OJ sitting in prison is not the same person.
You don't know whether he did anything. What if you are wrong? Just remember, one day you will stand before your Creator and you will be questioned about everything. Before you judge people you better be sure.
+twain103 Shut up!!! I'm so sick of people charging Arrogance...You DO NOT know this man! Not saying he's innocent..I think he's guilty but you don't know OJ Simpson any better than I do!
Just noticed something, when the interviewer asks about the hair found at the scene, wouldn't he flat out deny it if he was innocent yet OJ just uses the word consistent.
Photographs unearthed in the civil trial proved he owned the Bruno Magli shoes. OJ's testimony was that the photos were doctored to show him wearing the shoes, except archived photographs from his sportscasting career showed him wearing the shoes months before the murders.
I think the interviewer should have been tougher on the gloves question. I might have asked it like this: "We know for a fact that Nicole put 2 pairs of Aris Lights gloves on her credit card from Bloomingdale's before the murder. It just so happens that this EXACT SAME model, and it's a relatively rare and expensive model, were found at the murder scene next to your wife and Ron's dead bodies and behind your house. Do you honestly expect people to believe that this is a coincidence?"
The goal of the interviewer is to keep the liar lying and to get the whole story from the liars perspective. If he would have been more tough, o.j. would have acted hostel and be more likely to end the interview.
Petrocelli: "So we called him back to the stand and we said, ‘Now Mr. Simpson, you said that this first photograph of the shoes was doctored. Are you saying the next one is doctored, and the next one?’ And we proceeded to show him picture after picture, until the jurors couldn't even look at him anymore. And they started looking down at their shoes. And it was as obvious as it could possibly be that a witness was lying."
Anybody else get the feeling that this interview was probably set up by OJ's PR team? The interviewer isnt really challenging him and OJ seems to have very good answers to these "Random" questions..
it was a pay per view video that was released and all questions were not submitted before hand.. however i do agree that the interviewer should have pushed a little harder on certain questions :)
Anyone doubting this man's guilt needs to go watch the "If I Did It" interview. It's on RUclips and it's fucking disturbing. It's basically a confession. OJ starts off describing the murders through the eyes of a character he invented named "Charlie", but quickly starts speaking in the 1st person. He takes you step by step through the murders and every once in a while he realizes he's speaking in the 1st person, corrects himself, and then resumes speaking in the first person. All the while, you're sitting there realizing that his team of lawyers knew OJ was a murderer but got him acquitted and now he's free while Nichole and Ron lay in their graves.
He's so smooth, and totally full of it!! We are all inundated with crime shows these days. It's almost common knowledge that a guilty party will " over explain" details. If he was "set up" then allllll those people had to lie on a moments notice and then corroborate same stories. Also if the glove was planted, how did Furhman( or anyone) know that OJ was even in town? Also if he cut his hand in Chicago, how in hell did his blood magically get to the crime scene, the bronco, and on the fence? Oh yeah...he was there!!! How can anyone with logic,knowing what we know about forensics still think he did not do this!? In Canada we don't have quite the racial tension that sadly you guys have in the states so the trial played a bit differently here. Still drives me nuts that he was found not guilty.
Tommy Petersen bloody good comment! I think jealousy got to him. It happens all the time in abusive relationships. Just because he’s OJ, doesn’t mean he isn’t capable of feeling this rage. He is a sociopath. He consistently talks about himself in the third person. “People know OJ wouldn’t do THAT” no, maybe OJ the sportsman, the celebrity, wouldn’t. But Orenthal James Simpson would. He is a man....nothing more!
Funny because he swears he didn't do it and spends so much time trying to defend that notion but didn't once try and find who's "really" to blame .. Hmm very suspicious right And when told Nicole has been murdered he didn't bother to ask what happened or how, that alone with out mentioning evidence should tell you something
+1980Nicoletta exactly, like I don't know how that didn't hold any weight with the jury, but then again the jury didn't even care about all the blood evidence lol
He rearranges all the facts, into a mess of nonsense never once does he say who he thinks did it and anyone thinks the cops were just waiting to set him up (with this murder) is nuts
Actually, thats exactly what happened. It was shown, with absolute 100% certainty, that the LAPD planted his blood to sway the verdict. Main reason for the not guilty.
@@Jim.Jim.32 LOL They didn't even know that the victims were connected to him when they found the blood and came upon the scene. Why are you sure he's innocent? Very strange!
The only things Johnnie Cochran did was get a guilty man off from what he deserved and that was the death penalty. It was apparent that OJ's DNA was definitely found at the crime scene, and yet the jury was deceived into suspending their belief, this was done by stealth and by the so called "Dream Team's" confusing the jury into absolute confusion. And yet OJ was found totally guilty at a later Civil trial, where that same DNA confusion was not allowed to occur, as applied and enforced by a far wiser Judge than that in the first trial. OJ was found guilty and was later proved so by his criminal conduct later on when found to be a robber also. OJ Simpson was gotten off of one of the most heinous crimes, he stabbed to death 2 innocent people, and I feel sorry for their families.
I laugh when he says “I wouldn’t wear those ugly shoes” because they have pictures of him wearing those “ugly shoes” and when they showed him a photo of him with them on he was looking like 😳😳😳
It also shows how stupid he is. He’s basically telling you why he wore those shoes that night. He put on clothes he knew he’d be throwing away because he didn’t really like them.
What are the odds of O J getting a flight to Chicago literally just moments after the death of his ex wife? obviously he was hoping to be out of town before her body could be discovered giving him some sort of alibi..."I wasn't even in town at the time of her death"...nice try O J.
+R_L_I Yep he came back alright, with a deep cut and gashes all over his left hand which he told police he couldn't even remember how he done it, funny enough it was the left glove that was found at the crime scene too, O J even told police himself that he bled all over his house and his Bronco on the night of the murders, so much for the blood being planted when it came right from the horses mouth, but don't let this rushing home as you call it fool you, he was soon rushing off again with 10 thousand in cash plus his passport while telling police "I'm the only one who deserves to be hurt"
He gets evasive when they talk about the shoes. He gets asked 'Did you ever have these shoes'.. Notice his hesitation. He gives himself a second or so to recall an answer he has 'prepared'. He doesn't answer direct. Instead he dodges by saying he would have never 'worn' them because they were 'ugly', and he's not familiar with the types of shows he owns. But it was proven in the civil case through numerous photos , some published well before the murders that he did own this type of shoe and he he had worn them. This type of show was so rare that only a small number of people owned them. The print of this show was at the crime scene..
Imagine how invincible he must've felt after getting acquitted of double murder. Especially when everyone knew he did it. I can't even fathom that feeling. Sadly I'm sure he has killed again.
ONE THING A NARCISSIST CANT HANDLE IS SOMEONE LEAVING THEM. I THINK OJ CANT EVEN HANDLE THE PPL LEAVING HIM. HE'S TOO DEPENDENT ON THE PUBLIC IMAGE OF HIMSELF...........HE CANT STAND LOSING ANYTHING!
I have to admit that im totally addicted to this story. This happened when I was 12 years old and never once was I told by an adult that he may not have committed these murders. It was always accepted as common knowledge (mainly because of the racial division at the time) that he was guilty. After doing my own research I am now convinced that his son Jason committed the murders and OJ was called to the scene or randomly showed up at that moment. Every single action that OJ took within the first 48 hours following the crime paints the perfect picture of this scenario.
Exactly. For me the woollen beanie is a clincher - plenty of photos of his son wearing such a thing but not him. If so he’s covered for his son all this time.
Jason was on probation at the time of the murders for attacking his former boss with a knife. He had also been diagnosed with intermittent rage disorder.
Doesn't explain the blood. Jason did not have O.J.'s DNA. The only people who have the same DNA are twins. Parents and children only have SOME components but not the same DNA. For example, each of us have a partial match to our mother and a partial match to our father. We don't MATCH either our father or mother but we have our own DNA. Jason really had no motive. O.J. did. He also knew Nicole was terrified of knives. He had also purchased a knife recently. He had been abusing her and stalking her. The murder was done in a fit of rage. O.J., although older, was a powerfully built former pro football star, who has all the more powerful due to his heightened rage at that moment. He didn't have a lot of blood on him because he attacked Nicole from behind; her blood flowed forward. Whatever blood he got on him in the murders, he likely - well let's face it, he HAD to wash off before the limo driver came - an appt O.J. was quite late for. So O.J. was not home and had no alibi during the time of the murders. The gloves that were found were the exact pair Nicole had bought him as a Christmas gift, including his size. The shoes that made bloody prints were expensive shoes that were also rare, in his size. O.J. denied ever having those shoes, only to see in photos that he is seen wearing them. Nicole told friends that O.J. was going to kill her and he was going to get away with it. I think people must want a video of him actually murdering her to believe his guilty. Honest to God logic and even science fails to convince them.
Just the way every person who has ever come in contact with him is alive. U people have a mindset bcoz of all the lies u have heard. Do some investigation & see the truth before attacking an innocent man.
@@GregHalvorson enjoy being on the wrong side of history. Keep watching & worshiping the media. Pray this doesn’t happen to u or ur loved ones when u are innocent & people call u evil & guilty. Good bye
every bag except for that small bag he allowed to be loaded intot the car by allen Park and Kato.... why did he want to physically to car and keep with him -- the day he came back from Chicago the next day.. the only piece of luggage that was outside and it just happened to be the one kardashian take with him... suddenly NO ONE knows where it is. \\
He can't explain the evidence or give a straight answer to any of the questions, so he just blames everyone for everything. Everyone's a liar. I forgot how arrogant he was.
Reporter asks OJ, what was in the bag you didn't ant anyone to touch?" OJ replies...."What bag?" LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! The bag EVERYONE has talked about for 2 years! The one you screamed for no one to touch. He says "What bag"....hahahaha! So guity.
The blood evidence and other proof may not be enough for some people to believe oj did it but his eye's and body language plus his sociopathic behavior is a dead giveaway. OMG this guy reeks with guilt. Psychology 101 here. It's embarrassing to watch.
+Marky Mark I don't get it either.. His body language is stagnant, his vocabulary complex enough portraying him intelligent, and I know, intelligence doesn't render innocence, but it certainly supports it more than idiocy.. So I don't see the dead giveaway you're talking about
Actually your wrong. I know he killed them but you're wrong when you say he is a sociopath. Maybe you should read more into it. Sociopaths tend to be nervous and easily agitated. They are volatile and prone to emotional outbursts, including fits of rage. They are likely to be uneducated and live on the fringes of society, unable to hold down a steady job or stay in one place for very long. It is difficult but not impossible for sociopaths to form attachments with others. Many sociopaths are able to form an attachment to a particular individual or group, although they have no regard for society in general or its rules. In the eyes of others, sociopaths will appear to be very disturbed. Any crimes committed by a sociopath, including murder, will tend to be haphazard, disorganized and spontaneous rather than planned. Psychopaths, on the other hand, are unable to form emotional attachments or feel real empathy with others, although they often have disarming or even charming personalities. Psychopaths are very manipulative and can easily gain people’s trust. They learn to mimic emotions, despite their inability to actually feel them, and will appear normal to unsuspecting people. Psychopaths are often well educated and hold steady jobs. Some are so good at manipulation and mimicry that they have families and other long-term relationships without those around them ever suspecting their true nature. When committing crimes, psychopaths carefully plan out every detail in advance and often have contingency plans in place. Unlike their sociopathic counterparts, psychopathic criminals are cool, calm, and meticulous. Their crimes, whether violent or non-violent, will be highly organized and generally offer few clues for authorities to pursue. Intelligent psychopaths make excellent white-collar criminals and "con artists" due to their calm and charismatic natures.
There is no explanation they're the shoes that were at the scene. Perhaps they were sold to Nicole which is why the shops don't remember selling HIM the shoes.
He wore the shoes. They were published prior to the murders so there couldn't be any doctoring. Not only that, but one of the attorneys found thirty one additional pics of him wearing the shoes. Guilty!
+1980Nicoletta in his defense though (far be it that I'd defend the bloke...however) you can imagine spending 15 months in court and only talking to his lawyers all day every day... a lot of their vernacular would have rubbed off on him.
"I would never wear those ugly ass shoes", and yet SIX MONTHS prior to the murders, he is ON CAMERA from a Buffalo Bills event WEARING THOSE BRUNO MAGLI SHOES. That alone proves his guilt. Plus with all the other evidence. Guilty as sin.
If you look closely you'll notice that every rebuttal he has is a conspiracy angle. Everyone is lying but him. Nothing is true. It's amazing there are some people that believe he's innocent. Should they be allowed to vote? 😂
Are you even listening? No he doesn’t say that at all. People make mistakes and have faulty memories but nobody listen to that because at the time everyone assumed he was guilty. That’s a special kind of bias. He could be a wifebeater yet not be a murderer.
Lets not forget the 12 hairs that MATCHED his hair on Ron's shirt. along with carpet fibers from the bronco. Let's not forget Nicole's hair on the bloody glove. "ugly ass Bruno magli shoes. that he never would wear, he is photographed In not only that, Nicole and her sister, Dominique also had a pair, the gloves were an xmas gift from Nicole in 1990
Agree with OJ about the gloves and clothes in general...people wear them...all the time...photographed or not...how is that a 'significant' coincidence? It's probably these 'little' things that made the jury have some doubts, too ~ like, uh, huh? why is this significant?..etc. confused them.
+Liesl Sherer Scott may have come off rude but your ignorant ....he is simply telling you to stop being a human robot think for yourself and based on what you said and think you have absolutely no idea about this case. I lived through it from the beginning to the end. Every word every detail. From a legal perspective he is innocent but more or less the fact his son was never questioned is a huge issue. Read a book and gather your thoughts don't be a human robot.
1:20 FBI investigation cannot verify any sales people at the few stores that sold the shoe. The photo of OJ wearing the shoes differ from the photos the Mfg has. The shoe itself is over-the-calf hiking boot. Not a casual loafer. CASE CLOSED!
“I submit” OJ learned some new words during the trial
He is so calm, and talking so calm, that you actually ask yourself "is he a killer?" He is a damn good actor
He's had a lifetime of being the center of attention everywhere he goes. He's very comfortable in front of a lot of eyes.
Ted Bundy talked very calmly too.
he wasnt even this good as Nordberg in Naked Gun. and he can be calm because at this point he couldnt get in trouble anyways. good ole double jeopardy law.
IMO he’s a bad actor because I see through his BS. OJ is a 🤡
Sociopath.
OJ totally contradicts himself in this interview. The shoes. He says he would never wear Bruno Maglis. Then he goes on to say that most people don't even know the name of their shoes, and that he had upwards of 40 pairs of shoes. If he had 40 plus pairs of shoes and can't know the name of all of the shoes how can he say he has never worn Bruno Maglis?
MARK A HEY IDIOT, if you want to see a joke and contradiction and pure fables, watch the prosecution, marcia clark was so inept she couldn't even win with framed evidence, shows you there is a god, and evil gets checked
JHOT 247 nah man. The prosecution made mistakes but let’s be real about this. The only reason he got off was because of Mark furhmans racism and ultimately pleading the fifth to not further damage his character. There’s no way the entire lapd conspired to get OJ because if indeed it was someone else who committed this crime, why then frame OJ when you have the supposed “actual” evidence from the real killers at the scene. Why say, let’s get rid of the evidence left by the real killer to frame OJ. Makes no sense considering OJ had a great relationship with the cops. Nah man, he did this crime. No question about it.
@@elwinamaya1889 The reason he got off I thought was the police brutality and the verdict was to counter that.
@@jhot2478 agreed
Do you believe that a black man doesn't know what kind of fucking shoes that he wears? Get the FUCK OUTTA HEYA! I'm creole...half black, and half white, and that's some bullshit.
Johnny is so good he has the murderer believing he didnt do it... lol
Johnnie was the best RIP
Actually the other way around
OJ is like a lot of guilty people, he talks, says a lot of words, but says nothing.
ray Gordon Reminds of Donald Trump ha
"NO mom, I was putting the cookies IN the cookie jar?"
He sounds smarter than you
Absolutely incredible....never come across anything like it....what exactly did he have to do to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed serial murder? Were they expecting to see a photo of him next to the victims with the murder weapon? Unbelievable!
@@Viewer820 He could have pleaded guilty in court and the jury still would have found him not guilty because it was a backlash to the police brutality.
For a man who thinks guys shouldn't know a lot about shoes, he sure knows a lot about gloves.
+Brenden Walton he sure seems to have a very selective memory,knows great detail about small things,and nothing about the bigger questions
"I'm not black!,I'm O.J."
he's such a cocky bitch he knows about clothes and labels he lies
alora danon of course he does,he's been a actor for years
I can't with him how ducked
"I'm not black,I'm O.J."
That was his downfall. Lies all lies. He will lie about this until his dying day.
Ok 🤷🏾♂️
@@brtshmvne8856 beet me 2 it
bunny fish Stupidest shit I ever heard!!!!!
Those were not HIS words. Just bcoz they made Cuba say it doesn’t mean OJ said it. Those were were never spoken by the real OJ.
It’s a shame that so many people are so much misinformed & brainwashed.
"I would have never worn those ugly shoes", this was before the pictures of him wearing those shoes, a complete sociopath.
No, then I would be a Giants fan.
YUP
***** Just misunderstood then?
***** I guess we did.
EVEN WITH THE ATTORNEYS SHOWING THE PICS OF HIM IN THOSE SHOES HE STILL LIED AND SAID HE DIDBT OWN ANY.....LOL...HE'S DEFINITELY SICK IN THE HEAD!!
The fascinating thing is that he transcends narcissism. Usually narcissists will eventually reveal themselves or lash out when pressured over time. He doesn't. He just keeps on going, ice cold machine.
There's 30 pictures of him wearing them.
@Jesse Hernandez I'm not sure if it's 30 photos but it wouldn't surprise me. He wore them often, so when he says he doesn't because they're ugly is just one of countless examples of pathological lying. He has an answer for everything but every answer is bullshit. He does it over and over and doesn't realize it's painfully obvious that he isn't smarter than everyone else in the room. If he was he'd shut his damn mouth, but an egomanic narcissist just can't get it through their skull.
The soles used in those shoes are used for other brands too. & they never found that particular make in his wardrobe, nor does the pictures prove which brand they are. In fact nobody who were authorised to sell those shoes came forward & said they sold him those shoes. Everyone they asked denied having sold any to him. As usual people falling for all the media garbage 🥺
@@PhenomenalDiva In the Civil Trial he was caught red handed in the shoes and asked about it in his deposition and his reaction said it all... Please GTFOH. Nobody in 2024 believes OJ is innocent lol
if in fact, it was my blood,
if in fact it was my cap,
if in fact it was my gloves,
if in fact those were my shoes,
I did not do it. WTF
"NO one sold me those kind of shoes!! I would never wear those ugly shoes!!!!!"
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! A picture then surfaced of him at a football game wearing them on the side lines while reporting.
Source?
Jordan Anderson ruclips.net/video/UOqdmeU_C6s/видео.html
30 pics !!!! pmsl
@@jordan4547 The CIVIL TRIAL, moron!
@@jordan4547 gO WATCH THE cIVIL COURT LAWSUIT. ITS ON RUclips!
The more I listen to the interview the more I think he did it
I don't think he did it.
I KNOW HE DID IT.
The evidence proved it beyond all doubt.
they actually have pictures of him in the shoes lol. wow this guy is good.
They were possibly doctored as the game weather calls fro rain and it is sold out. When you look at the photos the sun is out no crowd in the stadium . They have never found the shoes, clothes, or knife / knives
@@garrickgregory6403 those pics were published in a Buffalo Bills newsletter many months prior to the murders. no need to doctor them before the murders happened.
@@markmac2206 these photos showed up two years later . Where is the contact sheet if the whole game . Plus the weather conditions of the game call for rain and wind .
@@garrickgregory6403 Dan Petrocelli found thirty one pictures of him wearing the shoes. I don't think thirty one pics were doctored. Come on, now.
@@TanjiTuesday they were found two years later and never found any receipt to these shoes as the FBI had a copy of every shoe Simpson owned. No Bruno Magli were ever found. Also there was another shoe at the crime scene on the envelope containing the sunglasses and the jeans on Goldman. The actual game is on RUclips where these supposed pictures were taken . September 26, 1993 Bills vs Dolphins as the game is sold out , rain and wind conditions compared to the photos showing a sunny day . Fraudulent Photos given a pass just get a victory in Civil Court
17 years of abuse is not a "one or 2 " incident.
OJ: That wasn't my blood I spilled some Kool-aid, man. OJ: My limo driver didn't see me, he lied. OJ: I didn't kill anyone, they just ran into my knife.
"I give ninety percent of my clothes away" lmao trying to make himself seem like some charitable Good Samaritan 😂😂😂😂
Even in the bronco chase, he was just busy telling the officer on the phone how great he was. How he just loved everybody, how he just wanted to get to Nicole's grave and be with her.. I guess that why he had a fake mustache a goe-t and $9,000 in cash on him. It has always been me, me, me. I think that is why in these interviews he is so bold, he has felt like a God for so long he actually has come to believe it here. Thankfully the OJ sitting in prison is not the same person.
I wonder who got the shoes? Ha ha.
He’s very well spoken. What a bitter shame to see someone use their gifts for evil.
You don't know whether he did anything. What if you are wrong? Just remember, one day you will stand before your Creator and you will be questioned about everything. Before you judge people you better be sure.
@@hassanabdur-rahman1559 Lol!
He's a good talker but he's guilty as sin
+michael richard BUT he BELIEVES HIS LIES.His ego IS almost as big as that head of his.
+
YayaJada He SHOULD have been nominated for an OSCAR for that performance.His ARROGANCE is UNBELIEVABLE.
+twain103 Shut up!!! I'm so sick of people charging Arrogance...You DO NOT know this man!
Not saying he's innocent..I think he's guilty but you don't know OJ Simpson any better than I do!
Just noticed something, when the interviewer asks about the hair found at the scene, wouldn't he flat out deny it if he was innocent yet OJ just uses the word consistent.
Photographs unearthed in the civil trial proved he owned the Bruno Magli shoes. OJ's testimony was that the photos were doctored to show him wearing the shoes, except archived photographs from his sportscasting career showed him wearing the shoes months before the murders.
Watch Ted bundy interview, the similarities are stunning
I think the interviewer should have been tougher on the gloves question. I might have asked it like this: "We know for a fact that Nicole put 2 pairs of Aris Lights gloves on her credit card from Bloomingdale's before the murder. It just so happens that this EXACT SAME model, and it's a relatively rare and expensive model, were found at the murder scene next to your wife and Ron's dead bodies and behind your house. Do you honestly expect people to believe that this is a coincidence?"
@103447751888722220752 Why he would have only lied and told more bull shit.
michael richard True. But it just would have been a much better interview and I think OJ would have had to squirm a bit more.
The goal of the interviewer is to keep the liar lying and to get the whole story from the liars perspective. If he would have been more tough, o.j. would have acted hostel and be more likely to end the interview.
i think the interviewer was just happy to get out alive.
@@ratchow1 i doubt that, at the very beginning OJ admits this is for money. he couldnt afford to walk out.
Petrocelli: "So we called him back to the stand and we said, ‘Now Mr. Simpson, you said that this first photograph of the shoes was doctored. Are you saying the next one is doctored, and the next one?’ And we proceeded to show him picture after picture, until the jurors couldn't even look at him anymore. And they started looking down at their shoes. And it was as obvious as it could possibly be that a witness was lying."
He's like a black Ted Bundy when he talks.
Or a Jeffrey MacDonald...
He talks like every liar, too much about themselves.
Except OJ comes off as far more intimidating.
How many times does O.J use the phrases "I submit" ?
I submit about 800 times.
+Xiantoni Lynch IT WAS A NU WORD TRAVOLTA TOUGHT HIM
😂😂😂😂😂 right after I read this comment, he said it.
+Marc T a little suspect ? may I say A Lot !!! he did it these murdes
Wiat does mean submit?
I can see why certain people despise him.
“I would submit to you...” seems to be his new catchphrase here..lol!
Hey! Thanks for posting.
He talks like he's trying to solve a mystery novel
There's one too many coincidences here for me to feel like he's innocent
1 more like 100.
A million ‘coincidences’ don’t = compelling evidence if they individually are full of holes.
@@tektako Science alone does it. Guilty.
1:47 Hahahahaha, OJ didn't know he posed for pictures wearing those shoes, hahahahahahaha.
He'd never wear a pair of those ugly shoes, but there's a photo of him wearing them a year before the murders.
+Chris Simpson and they proved he bought them in court,same with gloves
+Chris Simpson So if he's lying about that what else is he lying about?
+michael richard everything lol
oj always could cut and run with buffalo
And human too
Anybody else get the feeling that this interview was probably set up by OJ's PR team? The interviewer isnt really challenging him and OJ seems to have very good answers to these "Random" questions..
it was a pay per view video that was released and all questions were not submitted before hand.. however i do agree that the interviewer should have pushed a little harder on certain questions :)
Would explain it.
Good answers because they're true answers
Anyone doubting this man's guilt needs to go watch the "If I Did It" interview. It's on RUclips and it's fucking disturbing. It's basically a confession. OJ starts off describing the murders through the eyes of a character he invented named "Charlie", but quickly starts speaking in the 1st person. He takes you step by step through the murders and every once in a while he realizes he's speaking in the 1st person, corrects himself, and then resumes speaking in the first person. All the while, you're sitting there realizing that his team of lawyers knew OJ was a murderer but got him acquitted and now he's free while Nichole and Ron lay in their graves.
He has an answer for everything
It must have been a coincidence when he was heard on a 911 call breaking down Nicole's door and screaming at her too.
tip one.....liars over talk when giving an answer! we all know he did it.
He's so smooth, and totally full of it!! We are all inundated with crime shows these days. It's almost common knowledge that a guilty party will " over explain" details. If he was "set up" then allllll those people had to lie on a moments notice and then corroborate same stories. Also if the glove was planted, how did Furhman( or anyone) know that OJ was even in town? Also if he cut his hand in Chicago, how in hell did his blood magically get to the crime scene, the bronco, and on the fence? Oh yeah...he was there!!! How can anyone with logic,knowing what we know about forensics still think he did not do this!? In Canada we don't have quite the racial tension that sadly you guys have in the states so the trial played a bit differently here. Still drives me nuts that he was found not guilty.
+Tommy Petersen It's either celebrity worship or the fact that he's a convincing liar
Tommy Petersen bloody good comment! I think jealousy got to him. It happens all the time in abusive relationships. Just because he’s OJ, doesn’t mean he isn’t capable of feeling this rage. He is a sociopath. He consistently talks about himself in the third person. “People know OJ wouldn’t do THAT” no, maybe OJ the sportsman, the celebrity, wouldn’t. But Orenthal James Simpson would. He is a man....nothing more!
Canada does have racism. You are a proof of it.
Funny because he swears he didn't do it and spends so much time trying to defend that notion but didn't once try and find who's "really" to blame .. Hmm very suspicious right
And when told Nicole has been murdered he didn't bother to ask what happened or how, that alone with out mentioning evidence should tell you something
+1980Nicoletta exactly, like I don't know how that didn't hold any weight with the jury, but then again the jury didn't even care about all the blood evidence lol
because the son done it
Because there s an Accomplice...
"Im with gloves the way I am with sunglasses, I lose them."
He sure lost a pair of gloves that night.
He rearranges all the facts, into a mess of nonsense never once does he say who he thinks did it and anyone thinks the cops were just waiting to set him up (with this murder) is nuts
Actually, thats exactly what happened. It was shown, with absolute 100% certainty, that the LAPD planted his blood to sway the verdict. Main reason for the not guilty.
@@Jim.Jim.32 LOL They didn't even know that the victims were connected to him when they found the blood and came upon the scene. Why are you sure he's innocent? Very strange!
@@TanjiTuesday furhman planted the glove only after speaking with Kato - who told him of OJs flight that evening.
The only things Johnnie Cochran did was get a guilty man off from what he deserved and that was the death penalty. It was apparent that OJ's DNA was definitely found at the crime scene, and yet the jury was deceived into suspending their belief, this was done by stealth and by the so called "Dream Team's" confusing the jury into absolute confusion. And yet OJ was found totally guilty at a later Civil trial, where that same DNA confusion was not allowed to occur, as applied and enforced by a far wiser Judge than that in the first trial. OJ was found guilty and was later proved so by his criminal conduct later on when found to be a robber also. OJ Simpson was gotten off of one of the most heinous crimes, he stabbed to death 2 innocent people, and I feel sorry for their families.
What happened to the funny guy from Naked Gun, this dude looks terrifying
I submit to you he is guilty as hell
You can't tell me an athlete doesn't know shoe brands
I laugh when he says “I wouldn’t wear those ugly shoes” because they have pictures of him wearing those “ugly shoes” and when they showed him a photo of him with them on he was looking like 😳😳😳
It also shows how stupid he is. He’s basically telling you why he wore those shoes that night. He put on clothes he knew he’d be throwing away because he didn’t really like them.
he don't talks as an innocent person...he speak to defend himself ...he knows his sin
In his defense, everyone already believed he was guilty so he can't just talk about it without that being in his mind already.
What are the odds of O J getting a flight to Chicago literally just moments after the death of his ex wife? obviously he was hoping to be out of town before her body could be discovered giving him some sort of alibi..."I wasn't even in town at the time of her death"...nice try O J.
+R_L_I
Yep he came back alright, with a deep cut and gashes all over his left hand which he told police he couldn't even remember how he done it, funny enough it was the left glove that was found at the crime scene too, O J even told police himself that he bled all over his house and his Bronco on the night of the murders, so much for the blood being planted when it came right from the horses mouth, but don't let this rushing home as you call it fool you, he was soon rushing off again with 10 thousand in cash plus his passport while telling police "I'm the only one who deserves to be hurt"
He gets evasive when they talk about the shoes. He gets asked 'Did you ever have these shoes'.. Notice his hesitation. He gives himself a second or so to recall an answer he has 'prepared'. He doesn't answer direct. Instead he dodges by saying he would have never 'worn' them because they were 'ugly', and he's not familiar with the types of shows he owns. But it was proven in the civil case through numerous photos , some published well before the murders that he did own this type of shoe and he he had worn them. This type of show was so rare that only a small number of people owned them. The print of this show was at the crime scene..
He's so good, at one point I believed he was innocent.
Very good interview.
Funny he mentions a knack for losing gloves.
When people have plenty of money they often lose things like gloves. Sad but true.
Coming back to this had this murder happened today a Ring camera would have caught the entire thing.
Amazing. Even OJ doesn't realize he was framed!!
Because there was an Accomplice.....
Just the fact that he has NO remorse about how he hit her proofs that he killed her.
Why is the interviewer acting like he's mad at OJ. Get over it dude.
Because he is. He is sitting by a murderer!
David Lynch
According to the courts he's not. So let's move on.
Ezekiel Major Do you honestly believe that every court case has been dealt fair? I'm sorry but that seems ignorant to think that way.
+Ezekiel Major Probably because he gives a dissertation for every question asked without answering it.
Alpha XXL That too, he ignores the questions and answers as though he makes a point but in reality I have no fucking clue what he's talking about.
Imagine how invincible he must've felt after getting acquitted of double murder. Especially when everyone knew he did it. I can't even fathom that feeling. Sadly I'm sure he has killed again.
Get real!!! His entire life is on camera. You're saying he's a serial kiler?
He sure did get really uncomfortable looking, when talking about his shoes.
I see a guilty and a liar man. Actually I really don't think I can call him a man.
Be honest how many can be in a 15 year relationship & never EVER have at least 1 incident?! Not saying it's okay to do messed up stuff!!!
+Leslee Rodriguez are you really saying that in most relationships the police are called out on 8 separate occasions for domestic abuse incidents....?
Whether or not he was guilty of the crime (which he probably was) the justice system failed to convict him. So he wins, they lose. Period.
If he could only dodge questions as good as he dodged linebackers... lol
ONE THING A NARCISSIST CANT HANDLE IS SOMEONE LEAVING THEM. I THINK OJ CANT EVEN HANDLE THE PPL LEAVING HIM. HE'S TOO DEPENDENT ON THE PUBLIC IMAGE OF HIMSELF...........HE CANT STAND LOSING ANYTHING!
I have to admit that im totally addicted to this story. This happened when I was 12 years old and never once was I told by an adult that he may not have committed these murders. It was always accepted as common knowledge (mainly because of the racial division at the time) that he was guilty. After doing my own research I am now convinced that his son Jason committed the murders and OJ was called to the scene or randomly showed up at that moment. Every single action that OJ took within the first 48 hours following the crime paints the perfect picture of this scenario.
You're the first person I've ever heard put forth that scenario. That'd be crazy if it's true.
RUclips videos about it. You can see whole videos about Jason’s guilt.
Exactly. For me the woollen beanie is a clincher - plenty of photos of his son wearing such a thing but not him. If so he’s covered for his son all this time.
Jason was on probation at the time of the murders for attacking his former boss with a knife. He had also been diagnosed with intermittent rage disorder.
Doesn't explain the blood. Jason did not have O.J.'s DNA. The only people who have the same DNA are twins. Parents and children only have SOME components but not the same DNA. For example, each of us have a partial match to our mother and a partial match to our father. We don't MATCH either our father or mother but we have our own DNA. Jason really had no motive. O.J. did. He also knew Nicole was terrified of knives. He had also purchased a knife recently. He had been abusing her and stalking her. The murder was done in a fit of rage. O.J., although older, was a powerfully built former pro football star, who has all the more powerful due to his heightened rage at that moment. He didn't have a lot of blood on him because he attacked Nicole from behind; her blood flowed forward. Whatever blood he got on him in the murders, he likely - well let's face it, he HAD to wash off before the limo driver came - an appt O.J. was quite late for. So O.J. was not home and had no alibi during the time of the murders. The gloves that were found were the exact pair Nicole had bought him as a Christmas gift, including his size. The shoes that made bloody prints were expensive shoes that were also rare, in his size. O.J. denied ever having those shoes, only to see in photos that he is seen wearing them. Nicole told friends that O.J. was going to kill her and he was going to get away with it. I think people must want a video of him actually murdering her to believe his guilty. Honest to God logic and even science fails to convince them.
Interviewer is lucky to be alive.
Ikr? I noticed him starting to get angry towards the interviewer
Just the way every person who has ever come in contact with him is alive.
U people have a mindset bcoz of all the lies u have heard. Do some investigation & see the truth before attacking an innocent man.
@@PhenomenalDiva -- OJ Simpson brutally murdered Nicole and Ron... Fact.
@@GregHalvorson enjoy being on the wrong side of history. Keep watching & worshiping the media. Pray this doesn’t happen to u or ur loved ones when u are innocent & people call u evil & guilty. Good bye
@@PhenomenalDiva -- O.J. Simpson is a double murderer.
first he says he would never were those ugly shoes, then he says he doesn't know if he ever owned a pair. Which is it?
He always sighs when Nicole is mentioned
A sign of guilt.
The reason he took Kato to McDonald’s was so he could establish an alibi
So they could buy drugs.
Drugs
How can you have an answer or better yet, an excuse, to EVERY question this man has to ask O.J.? How can ALL this evidence be just a coincidence?
You can if you're telling the truth
Because there was an Accomplice.....
every bag except for that small bag he allowed to be loaded intot the car by allen Park and Kato.... why did he want to physically to car and keep with him
-- the day he came back from Chicago the next day.. the only piece of luggage that was outside and it just happened to be the one kardashian take with him... suddenly NO ONE knows where it is.
\\
Was there really a Charlie as mentioned in IF I Did It book??
Ehrlich
He was photographed wearing the exact same pair of shoes in question... the same ugly shoes he claimed he would never wear....... size 12
He loses his gloves like he loses his glasses.. He lost his glove next to Nicole body
He can't explain the evidence or give a straight answer to any of the questions, so he just blames everyone for everything. Everyone's a liar. I forgot how arrogant he was.
and the photo when he was in the field??
Reporter asks OJ, what was in the bag you didn't ant anyone to touch?" OJ replies...."What bag?"
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! The bag EVERYONE has talked about for 2 years! The one you screamed for no one to touch. He says "What bag"....hahahaha! So guity.
this guy is so smart to just dispose of evidence like that. socks with blood and bloody gloves at his apartment. impossible. someone put them there
Dang he speaks like Obama.
What this video doesn't show is how truly massive this man's head is. And it's gotten even bigger since then.
he was a handsome gold looking man, big head or not
The blood evidence and other proof may not be enough for some people to believe oj did it but his eye's and body language plus his sociopathic behavior is a dead giveaway. OMG this guy reeks with guilt. Psychology 101 here. It's embarrassing to watch.
None of it matters anymore. He is in prison and that's where he'll most likely die. That's a shame lol
can you explain in more detail?
He speaks and sounds innocent to me. Dk what ur seeing
+Marky Mark I don't get it either.. His body language is stagnant, his vocabulary complex enough portraying him intelligent, and I know, intelligence doesn't render innocence, but it certainly supports it more than idiocy.. So I don't see the dead giveaway you're talking about
Actually your wrong. I know he killed them but you're wrong when you say he is a sociopath. Maybe you should read more into it. Sociopaths tend to be nervous and easily agitated. They are volatile and prone to emotional outbursts, including fits of rage. They are likely to be uneducated and live on the fringes of society, unable to hold down a steady job or stay in one place for very long. It is difficult but not impossible for sociopaths to form attachments with others. Many sociopaths are able to form an attachment to a particular individual or group, although they have no regard for society in general or its rules. In the eyes of others, sociopaths will appear to be very disturbed. Any crimes committed by a sociopath, including murder, will tend to be haphazard, disorganized and spontaneous rather than planned.
Psychopaths, on the other hand, are unable to form emotional attachments or feel real empathy with others, although they often have disarming or even charming personalities. Psychopaths are very manipulative and can easily gain people’s trust. They learn to mimic emotions, despite their inability to actually feel them, and will appear normal to unsuspecting people. Psychopaths are often well educated and hold steady jobs. Some are so good at manipulation and mimicry that they have families and other long-term relationships without those around them ever suspecting their true nature.
When committing crimes, psychopaths carefully plan out every detail in advance and often have contingency plans in place. Unlike their sociopathic counterparts, psychopathic criminals are cool, calm, and meticulous. Their crimes, whether violent or non-violent, will be highly organized and generally offer few clues for authorities to pursue. Intelligent psychopaths make excellent white-collar criminals and "con artists" due to their calm and charismatic natures.
Such a compelling case, even to this day. If I get a reasonable explanation for the shoes, I'll serious doubt his guilt.
There is no explanation they're the shoes that were at the scene. Perhaps they were sold to Nicole which is why the shops don't remember selling HIM the shoes.
He wore the shoes. They were published prior to the murders so there couldn't be any doctoring. Not only that, but one of the attorneys found thirty one additional pics of him wearing the shoes. Guilty!
Guilty as SIN!
lol, OJ talking like he went to law school; "I will submit to you". lol, get the fuck outta here!
***** Absolutely pathetic!
+1980Nicoletta in his defense though (far be it that I'd defend the bloke...however) you can imagine spending 15 months in court and only talking to his lawyers all day every day... a lot of their vernacular would have rubbed off on him.
O.J can be very convincing for sure , i have to admit O.J makes some good points.
Oj wasnt at the crime scene my friend. Trust me.
Jim Jim the only way you could know that is if you were there too,were you?
0:25 Hair found in knit cap was not OJs. CASE CLOSED!
I'm not sure he did it, but I'm sure he knows!
Very Jodi Arias.
"I would never wear those ugly ass shoes", and yet SIX MONTHS prior to the murders, he is ON CAMERA from a Buffalo Bills event WEARING THOSE BRUNO MAGLI SHOES.
That alone proves his guilt.
Plus with all the other evidence.
Guilty as sin.
This man is so incredibly charming. Wow. I am captivated while he speaks.
He is so handsomeeeeee
Ikr he's a gentlemen 😉
+1980Nicoletta no! He's a good looking guy but he's a psychopath for sure
Have you seen him lately? The Charm has faded.
He's a fat grey haired diabetic old shit now
That's what helps some people to get away with things. He's still got a disgusting character and treats women awfully
If the interviewer would have asked OJ if he ever owned or wore a sweater, I bet he would say no.
He just says no to everything.
If you look closely you'll notice that every rebuttal he has is a conspiracy angle. Everyone is lying but him. Nothing is true. It's amazing there are some people that believe he's innocent. Should they be allowed to vote? 😂
Are you even listening? No he doesn’t say that at all. People make mistakes and have faulty memories but nobody listen to that because at the time everyone assumed he was guilty. That’s a special kind of bias. He could be a wifebeater yet not be a murderer.
@@tektako - I could tell by your grammar (i.e. “…but nobody listen to that”) that you were likely to think he was innocent.
He could have been a news reporter.
Lets not forget the 12 hairs that MATCHED his hair on Ron's shirt. along with carpet fibers from the bronco.
Let's not forget Nicole's hair on the bloody glove.
"ugly ass Bruno magli shoes. that he never would wear, he is photographed In not only that, Nicole and her sister, Dominique also had a pair,
the gloves were an xmas gift from Nicole in 1990
Agree with OJ about the gloves and clothes in general...people wear them...all the time...photographed or not...how is that a 'significant' coincidence? It's probably these 'little' things that made the jury have some doubts, too ~ like, uh, huh? why is this significant?..etc. confused them.
shit don't make sense
Bless you Juice, stay up homie
Lol
Till this day I still think he was innocent
I doubt if an innocent person would be going on like this pulling apart every minute detail to try and prove his innocence.
No they would fight to find the real killer and not rest until they did just that.
This man is innocent goddanm it
+versaceking anthony Hahahaha!
what on earth makes you think that?
+Great Scott wow you're rude. I asked a simple question. no wonder you support a psychopath xD
+Liesl Sherer Scott may have come off rude but your ignorant ....he is simply telling you to stop being a human robot think for yourself and based on what you said and think you have absolutely no idea about this case. I lived through it from the beginning to the end. Every word every detail. From a legal perspective he is innocent but more or less the fact his son was never questioned is a huge issue. Read a book and gather your thoughts don't be a human robot.
+Anthony Lewis just because I disagree with you doesnt make me a "human robot." I can't stand people who can't handle other people's opinions.
1:20 FBI investigation cannot verify any sales people at the few stores that sold the shoe. The photo of OJ wearing the shoes differ from the photos the Mfg has. The shoe itself is over-the-calf hiking boot. Not a casual loafer. CASE CLOSED!