Which question hasn’t he addressed or answered ???? Bcoz u feel he’s guilty, u will obviously overlook anything that & everything that doesn’t fit your narrative.
Interesting. AT 2.20 or so he is POSITIVE detective (Officer Phillips) said Nicole was "murdered." He will "never forget it." AT 3.50, he says detective MIGHT have said Nicole was "killed." Just a point...
Give the nigga a break...of course there's holes in his story, everyone knows he did it. What's fascinating is how he handles it and beats the system. Nigga deserves a grammy for this.
***** Oh shut the fuck up with that shit, nobody is trying to hear your morally correct bullshit because somebody have called you a "nigga" today and you caught some feelings. In case you can't tell I am a NIGGA. foh.
What's crazy is that he puts so much passion into making excuses for everything he gets asked,but when asked about how he feels when he visits Nichole's grave he doesn't show any emotion at all...He is so guilty it's fucking sickening
EDTA was found in multiple blood samples from the scene, the house, AND the bronco; EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there... we've never been told the complete story..
CDubs HasIt The EDTA claim is very problematic. In order for the EDTA to have come from the purple-topped tubes, both the ion count and the parts per million would be different than what the defense's DNA witness claimed. During the civil trial two forensic chemists explained that the EDTA was not consistent with what would have been needed for the blood to have been planted, and they were right. Also, the EDTA was not found/tested in the Bronco blood, only the back gate and sock blood as far as I know.
Not one answer oj gives is the answer of an innocent person. Anyone could read this interview as that of an obviously guilty person. This interview should be used in Abnormal Psych 101 on how to read a sociopath, it's textbook.
mitch cumstein Aren't you mixing DNA what with the criminal trial and the civil trial? I never understood which judge/court could proceed with a civil trial after Simpson had been acquitted in criminal court which has a higher level of proof. There should not have been a civil trial. And yes the EDTA is very problematic, chuckle, chuckle, chuckle. You're such a genius and OJ expert, wish you had been on the prosecution team, the laughs alone would be worth a million bucks.
"Aren't you mixing DNA what with the criminal trial and the civil trial?" *I don't understand your question. Forensic scientists from both trials (who had access to the original blood samples) claimed that the EDTA signatures did not match the vials as the defense's witness suggested. It doesn't really matter anyway seeing as how blood drops that had no EDTA were found next to the dead bodies before forensics showed up. The blood matched OJ's. This alone should be enough for a conviction.*
OJ is such a damn good liar that's he's almost got me convinced! Totally contradicts himself over and over, talks in circles, evades questions, and shifts blame. Classic narcissist/sociopath.
+Brittany Janes Says he cut his hand in Chicago but when questioned by the police he said he was dropping blood while he was running around packing before his trip. This evidence was not used in the trial! How fucking stupid was Marcia Clark?
Can you say DEFLECTION? I have never seen anyone skirt the issues like OJ does in these interviews. He always turns the questions back on the interviewer, instead of manning up and answering with a straight response!
TheDurhamBull OH,he learned from the best. The people he chose: Dershowitz,Cochran Jury Consultant Jo-Ellen Dimitris ALL were interviewed about O.J. BEFORE the trial. He MUST have been watching because he put them on his team.
twain103 It's amazing this dude got away with murder. Motive: The love of his life truly moved on and he couldn't handle supporting her financially and seeing someone else enjoy the fruits of his labor. But then the demons haunted him and now he is serving time for a crime he probably should have gotten away with (retrieving something that was taken from him). In the end all was a very sad situation.
TheDurhamBull Look at part 7 at 13:48.He slips and says Sidney knows if her mother is dying & giggling OR rather crying& giggling. The inner O.J. wants to confess.Nicole was 17/18 when they met.She told her male roommate ,he ripped her pants. He THEN set her up into her own apartment.( away from her male friend roommate)Nicole was young, when she met him. If after the divorce she: dated,smoke,drank ,smoked a little weed,etc.She was probably reliving her youth. He got on with his life dating everybody,WHY could'nt she? He has been doing a lot of blaming,accusing people of lying. HAS he EVER shed a tear over ANYONE but himself? The mother of his youngest children,he talks about her death,after her death SO CASUALLY.
Remember he's an experienced actor. As an actor, your job to convince the audience you are a character you're trying to portray. Obviously lots of training and practice
He is very engaged in convincing us that he is innocent. I reckon wrongly accused, innocent people don’t need to put on a big show. They don’t need to go into such meandering detail. And their energy would be a lot more subdued.
If America spent this amount of energy trying to repay reparations instead of trying to incriminate black people America would be great for once in its existence
Earlier in this exact interview he said he was doing anything to NOT take a nap before the red eye (going to Burger King). Yet here he claims he was in his bed….BUSTED.
Its just mind boggling isn't it. I Love this interviewer. He pulled no punches and did not appear to be intimidated in the least by this sick person. He didn't mean to run??! No the fake mustache, gottee and cash were from last years halloween party.
I don't think he nessecarly intended to run. He was suicidal. Thats not a time when you make a lot of decitions. He might have had this stuff in case he wanted to run later. But in the end he didn't needed it.
At 8:25 he stutters and almost says Glove instead of glass when he's talking about supposedly throwing a glass down and trying to clean it up and that's how he cut his finger. People speculated that the cut on his finger came about from the murders, and there wad one glove left at the crime scene thought to be worn by the murderer. It's suspicious to me, like he almost let the truth out for just a second that he got the cut on his finger after he dropped the Glove, not a glass
@@anthonylewis3095 I agree. He could have just been tripping up his words based on the other stories people have been saying. I'm not saying he's innocent...just that his stuttering is not evidence.
He brought Kato FROM Nicole's home,he was EVEN jealous of him. Kato should think back:When DID O.J. EVER give him the time of day,BEFORE that night? You can BET O.J. had jobs for Kato to do ,while staying at his house it was'nt a free ride.
0:10 Come again OJ? He just got done (7:27 of pt 2) saying he wasn't in bed/asleep prior to the driver Alan Park picking him up that night. In pt 2 of this interview when asked why he lied to the limo driver, who said OJ told him he missed his call because he was asleep. OJ says... "I never ever, ever said that I was asleep, ever. When I walked outside Kato Kaelin said to me 'Did you oversleep?' I saw in one report that Kato said to Alan Park when he first saw him uh, 'he must have overslept' so I'm assuming with all of this happening Alan Park just assumed I overslept." OJ then goes on to explain that "The main reason I went to McDonald's instead of just having a bowl of cereal is because I was trying to stay awake. It was Kato who had said to me when we returned to my house 'maybe you could take a nap' & I said 'hey, I don't have time to take a nap' & I didn't want to take a nap. I was getting on a Red Eye & if you've ever taken a Red Eye, the last thing I wanted to do was sleep before getting on the Red Eye because I had hoped to be able to sleep on the Red Eye. Never mind the fact that it doesn't seem plausible that Kato would (knowing OJ was trying to stay awake) ask him if he had overslept. But why, when asked about the time between 9:36 & 10:53 that is unaccounted for, would OJ respond that he usually goes to bed around 8:30 by the clock every day? Taken in context, this makes no sense to me.
OK, for me, here's the thing. It's not what he is saying, it's what he is NOT saying. If ANY man was in that situation, wife murdered, he didn't do it. ANY man would be asking first and foremost "What is being done to catch the real murderer(s)" He did not post any reward, he did not hire any private investigators, did not apply pressure to the DA or LAPD. Just seems wrong to me..
at 8:25 he slips up and confesses… OJ cut his finger with the knife when he removed his tight fitting GLOVE, dropping the GLOVE after slicing his middle finger. He was then forced to quickly leave the scene, leaving the evidence behind, since it would be a time consuming risk to try to locate the knit cap and the GLOVE by groping in the dark on the ground because the dog would not cease wailing. The anecdote he cut his middle finger on a GLASS in Chicago is not only in itself inconsistent with statements made under interrogation, but it is the essential and pivotal lie of the whole storyline. For the precise reason of being conscious and aware that even the prosecution inaccurately bound the events and findings together of how the episode played out, does he not only lean forward to bring the issue up for a rehearsed clarification, but in the process of upholding the weight of the lie, he subconsciously lets out the truth which slips into the forefront of his mind, as he unwittingly confesses at 8:25.
Finally an eye witness. Where were you when we needed you? You cheated us out of our fun (OJ fried in the electric chair) after we waited an entire year for the "thumbs down" signal. Damn you.
The crucial thing is no witnesses on his flight to Chicago or at LAX where he was signing autographs saw any cut(s) on Simpson's hand. No blantant bull that's what they testified under oath.
+Jack Johnson He said he cut it to police and then re-opened it in Chicago when he heard about Nicole (lol). He bled all over the murder scene, the glove and all over his bronco and his house. He uses all his lawyer's bullshit in this interview... There was a conspiracy, planted blood, planted gloves. He is a lying psycho and could fundamentally not care about another person. Nicole was a trainwreck herself and the results are visible to all.
+NJA1039 You guys keep retailing the same old debunked theories. Don't you even watch the video's you're commenting on? It's mind boggling to read the same mechanically delivered falsehoods over and over and over again. None of your statements are true and it's knowable b you that you're repeated known lies...so why, why, why do you types continue to repeat these lies and then act as if you know them to be true, especially when anyone that wants to know can know that you're lying. It should be embarrassing to you to be such a moron.
The way he maintains his innocence and acts so calmly in these interviews really has me thinking it's possible that he is indeed innocent. But the evidence just says the complete opposite.
Which evidence ? U mean the pictures of those blood drops they clicked at Rockingham after they collected his blood ? Or the sock with blood which wasn’t there when they start the camera & appears magically 3 mins later ? Or the glove that obviously wasn’t his? Ever heard of a killer leaving a glove at the crime scene & another one at his property while carefully destroying everything else ? Is it possible for the glove to have just drops of blood after stabbing 2 people multiple times & slashing their throats ??? Common sense isn’t really common I guess.
@@MoneyOverFame I already answered u, whatever they claimed to have found was just a ‘claim’. Pictures were taken only & only after they collected his blood when he returned from Chicago. Now u tell me , how do u explain the fact that they didn’t submit the blood or anything they collected from OJ’s house to the forensic team/lab on the same day & why Van Hatter took it home & submitted only 36 hrs later. When asked under oath if he’s ever done this during any of his other cases , he says a no & has no explanation as to why he did that in OJs case .
@@MoneyOverFame u should watch the trial (the entire trial is uploaded here on RUclips ) Also do read Nicole’s best friends testimony during OJ’s civil trial here simpson.walraven.org/cf_depo1.html
Max V World Nah I think he's a natural. If you're a good liar, you know one when you see one. Lying is an art, if you will. Acquired throughout the years...it's not acting. He sucks at acting, as he lacks basic focal emphasis. He emphasizes the irrelevant parts.He has a blank expression most of the times and then he throws some facial expressions when stating irrelevant stuff, like in the previous video when he said that the neighbors sent food to the house and he frowned, trying to bring attention to that detail. As if it mattered what that the neighbors were nice towards him...when we all know that typically abusers are not known to be abusers outside of the family. However...even though he sucks at acting, he has mastered lying and deviating, and most of all...dissociating. He is totally dissociated from the time and place where the interview is happening. If you dissociate you can do pretty much anything and recite anything. His face is relaxed...you can tell tha tin his mind he is in his "happy place". This is something learnt in a person's first years of life. I talk from personal experience.
He actually wasn't a suspect at that time. In fact it was assumed he was actually already in Chicago when the murderers took place. It wasn't until they realised he was still in Rockingham at that time that's when they began to suspect him.
@@sotyfan73 I said "Potential Suspect." when murders happen, anybody in the relation to the victims, is a "Potential Suspect." and again the L.A.P.D. would never tell a "Potential Suspect." the cause of the victims deaths.
In order to Furhman to plant the glove at OJs house at 5:00am that would mean Furhman would have to know OJ was cut on his left side. That's not possible because Furhman never saw OJ until later in the afternoon. So no way Fuhrman can Not plant that glove at OJs without knowing if OJ is injured or not
Boy, he sure now has his story perfected with years of practice. Watch the video the lost confession tape done before the hired lawyers prepped him to compare his answers.
No they didn’t say he was innocent they said “not guilty” “there is a HUGE difference,not guilty basically means “not proven” not necessarily that he’s truly innocent,because as anyone with a brain knows it’s impossible for him to be innocent!
You know, for majority of this interview, I really do want to believe him because he is so well spoken and convincing. He chuckles and smiles often after he speaks to make the person feel like he's an okay guy, shows no obvious signs of being a mad man like watching an interview like with a truly deranged person and I've seen a few online, but his demeanor is what makes the vibe you get from him very chilling. The man asked O.J 'why did you run?'. O.J said so many excuses...he wanted to go to the cemetery, he was on medication with side effects, it's not true bc I would've saved more money blah blah blah. An innocent man doesn't lead a police following like that, I'm sorry.
So the overwhelming circumstantial evidences is not enough to see he was not guilty. It’s so impossible that innocent people run away. Smh. It’s almost like we would believe him if he said he did it, which means we have already made up in our minds before the matter. The media has done an amazing job with creating the story.
I was at peace wtf? In his jeep driving at 70mph with the cops chasing him and a gun in the car??!! He lies through his teeth and always skirts around the questions asked!!
He said he broke the glass in the kitchen here but in a different interview said it was in the bedroom so which one was it? That's just one of the plethora of questions I'd like to ask him.
Is it me? This guys seems like a good guy. I don’t believe he did anything. He seems genuine, I fell sorry for him. I don’t know much about him, but he seems innocent and a good guy.
I watched a lot of OJ interviews. Gotta respect how he pisses all over the interviewers. He commited a double murder. DNA science today would have put him behind bars along with cctv
When someone is guilty they will talk and talk and try to make you think other wise just like oj he will change the subject and try to get around the actual question smh
Wow. O.J. Simpson was a handsome man and I never realized just how much until watching this vide. I remember Suzanne Somers saying he was a handsome man when her husband mentioned she was too rapped up in the OJ Simpson case. Even though he's in his late 60s now he STILL is an impressive looking man. And he comes across as a heart & soul man. Not a PERFECT man, but a good family man.
To me he comes across as a narcissist and a psychopath. You were right that he's very handsome. But you also think he's a good family man? Really? He cut the throat of his children's mother! Just so you know - that's a bad thing to do!
CDubs HasIt Huh? You have no clue what it is you are talking about. Know the case, understand what it is you are commenting on. You said…" EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there." You couldn't be any more incorrect. EDTA is also found in detergents, soaps, food, paint,etc. Now, the levels of EDTA in test tubes is extremely high. The levels found in our bodies, test extremely lower compared to the tubes (sometimes not even showing up). The EDTA found in the blood at the scene tested extremely low, because it was already in the blood stream. Having said that, if you were to conclude, as you do, that since EDTA was found in SOME blood samples, that makes OJ innocent….then surely, by definition, the FACT that there was no EDTA in the 5 blood drops leading away from the bodies would make OJ guilty. Pick a stance, you can't have it both ways. You pick first, then I will destroy whatever point you make. See, these things are not my opinion, they are fact. They cannot be disputed. By the way, the jury did not hear every shred of evidence. Do you just pull sh*t out of the sky and start typing? Wow.
OJ Simpson is almost 70 yrs. old. WHO CARES how much he weighs??? I know Simpson is not even focused on his looks but focusing on getting out of jail. A jail he should not be in @ all. OJ Simpson WILL BE FREE ONE DAY SOON. Hopefully you will be happy for him.
It’s fairly amazing to me that in LA of all places there were no traffic cameras or whatever to capture his vehicle going to and from the scene. Things have changed a lot since 1994 I guess....
There was one woman, who claimed to see OJ in the bronco rushing back to his home, her name was Jill Shively but the prosecution dumped her as a witness after learning she did an interview before testifying. Her testimony would have placed OJ leaving Bundy around 10:50. (If I remember correctly).
Anybody else notice every question he's asked starts with O.J. asking questions about the posed question? Why not just answer the questions? Oh yeah, I forgot, he's fucking guilty.
if he was indeed guilty; he could flat out say he was guilty.. why go to this trouble after a trial has set him free and never could be tried again? EDTA was found in multiple blood samples from the scene, the house, AND the bronco; EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there... we've never been told the complete story..
Really; the jury, based on the 'facts' presented had no choice but to let him go; and if people would look into it theyd see why they let him go and it wasnt because of "an all black jury"... there was indeed planted evidence by a severely racist detective.. as I said EDTA doesnt just show up out of nowhere... but why would he care if people hated him? He doesnt benefit monetarily from those folks who might hate him... he could admit it right on the spot if he were guilty but I really think this was a railroaded wealthy black man by a police department with a horrible horrible track record of mistreating black folks: the LAPD... watch the "BBC Oj Simpson: The Untold Story" on here on youtube, and it may open your eyes to some things you've never been told...
Im never going to claim that Simpson is a great man.. I just find some things a little fkn fishy.. I always thought he was guilty..since I was a little fellow I thought he was guilty but I got on here and watched that documentary and Im at about 50% he did it; 50% he didnt do it.. so I just think the jury got it right based on what was presented..
if you use your brain, you can hear him trip over and over again and again with his lies. hes constantly trying to convince he is not lying..ie hes lying
It's a complex case, the cops may have been dirty, the prosecution was incompetent... There may have been another individual involved to some extent ... But at the end of the day... He's fucking GUILTY
and if he's lying here, he's a fucking genius. He is VERY sincere, convincing and consistent. He's certainly got his own story straight with itself, and straight with the facts of the case. I'm not being sarcastic, it's genuinely fascinating, and chilling if he's guilty. Personally I think he probably is guilty... but legally... "reasonable doubt" - that's a tricky one.
Paul Higgins of course he does... he's been through a year long trial with a team of clever defense lawyers... he'd been practicing these answers for months and months!
Eva Czopek Mostly he's making a point , trying to get the viewers to think. He isn't answering a multiple choice test with answers drilled to him over and over again. Like when he said "when does a man have to account for his time when he is in his home"? Makes sense to me. This case stunk from the beginning. No evidence what so ever. A barking dog, c'mon.
Old trick to stop bleeding of cuts, push skin together hold, superglue, wait 3 seconds, wound closed, no bleeding... most people keep in the utility drawer in their kitchens. They also found his blood on sheets and pillow case in Chicago, and believe no blood on the broken glass. If he cut himself after the call and getting ready to immediately leave for LA why did he go back to bed.
@5:50 OJ has an opportunity to acknowledge a possible conspiracy by LAPD against him, yet he disavows that possibility. Yet in order to maintain he's innocent, he HAS TO SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPLAIN that his blood was planted by LAPD. That kind of inconsistency lends to credibility and guilt.
Let me offer this, when the police called him in Chicago, and told him his wife was dead, he says " I know they weren't playing" how did he know that, also he never said how did she die, Mr Simpson was involved in the murder, Det Furhman did transfer those gloves back to Rockingham, to make certain he didn't get away with it.
His personality is self centered and dominant - not uncommon. He lacks people skills, but that personality type attracts so called "friends" - they are more like "followers" than friends. Compare his personality to Donald Trump. Robert Kardashian relationship was as a O.J. follower. That's why the friends (followers) are so easy to turn their backs when O.J.'s life when down. His long term fame may have created this egotistical personality.
You think the prosecution was inept because there was an acquittal? That's how our system is supposed to function "beyond a reasonable doubt" and there was nothing but reasonable doubt in this case, in fact it was a joke.
Jack Johnson Yeah thats exactly what I think. The evidence is so overwhelming that he's guilty, that onlt only a retarded prosecution could fuck it up. If youve got the victims blood in his car and home andd still cant get a conviction, you should look for a new job
Blantant lie, the cops told O.J Nicole was dead, not murdered O.J contradicts every fact in this case. O.J never asked the W questions just my kids where are mt kids.
+Mitch Farkas That doesn't mean anything really. I am a great liar and one method I use when I lie is look people directly in the eyes intensely and I try to not move much. However, when I am not lying, generally I look in different directions trying to remember things or recall images. In conclusion though, I sometimes do that when I lie too. So...you can pin point the main constants, but you never know how well one can bend his personality and reactions.
what were you doing though OJ between 9.36 and 10.53?! you say you were home, what were you doing? simple. and the interviewer lets him get away with not answering.
There’s way more to this case than what we’ve been told … guilty or not . It’s a lot more than an obsessed ex husband stalker killing his ex and her friend in a fit of jealous rage … of course my dumb ass don’t know what it is… but there’s more . And the cops the city oj , everyone doesn’t want any light shed on more than the brutal murders .
by the way OJs talking bout how he signed autographs at the airport, and wasnt bandaged up, and as he was signing all these autographs at the airport, problably 2 or 3 at max, the people woulda noticed it!!! BULLLSHIT! ya wanna know why?? cause HE WAS CUT ON HIS LEFT HAND, AND OJ,s RIGHT HANDED!! LOL, so he woulda been signing those autographs at the airport, the night of the murders with his non cut RIGHT HAND!!! What a joke!!! a 10 year old could pick this guy apart, and thats why he NEVER took the stand!!!
I don't know whether he did it or not but I do believe he knows who did it and was at the crime scene after. He is probably trying to protect who ever did it. It could be his oldest son hence the same "blood" as him. Maybe? No one really knows 100% the truth.
Uh let me see if I have this correct. He WASN'T looking to do himself in but what does it mean when someone has a gun to their head? And he DID say on an interview program (I think it was a program in the UK called The Richard and Judy Show) that he pulled the trigger.
![Six Hundred Strike [EPIC: The Musical] Full Animatic](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zov6NXIAuow/mqdefault.jpg)
It's amazing how he answers questions WITHOUT answering the question.
He did answer the questions. What are you talking about?
Which question hasn’t he addressed or answered ????
Bcoz u feel he’s guilty, u will obviously overlook anything that & everything that doesn’t fit your narrative.
@@kai_johnsonn Were you there?
Turns every question about Nicole around to make it about him.
Interesting. AT 2.20 or so he is POSITIVE detective (Officer Phillips) said Nicole was "murdered." He will "never forget it." AT 3.50, he says detective MIGHT have said Nicole was "killed."
Just a point...
Give the nigga a break...of course there's holes in his story, everyone knows he did it. What's fascinating is how he handles it and beats the system. Nigga deserves a grammy for this.
***** Oh shut the fuck up with that shit, nobody is trying to hear your morally correct bullshit because somebody have called you a "nigga" today and you caught some feelings. In case you can't tell I am a NIGGA. foh.
@@crispinfrancis1an Oscar for the acting.
What's crazy is that he puts so much passion into making excuses for everything he gets asked,but when asked about how he feels when he visits Nichole's grave he doesn't show any emotion at all...He is so guilty it's fucking sickening
EDTA was found in multiple blood samples from the scene, the house, AND the bronco; EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there... we've never been told the complete story..
CDubs HasIt The EDTA claim is very problematic. In order for the EDTA to have come from the purple-topped tubes, both the ion count and the parts per million would be different than what the defense's DNA witness claimed. During the civil trial two forensic chemists explained that the EDTA was not consistent with what would have been needed for the blood to have been planted, and they were right. Also, the EDTA was not found/tested in the Bronco blood, only the back gate and sock blood as far as I know.
Not one answer oj gives is the answer of an innocent person. Anyone could read this interview as that of an obviously guilty person. This interview should be used in Abnormal Psych 101 on how to read a sociopath, it's textbook.
mitch cumstein
Aren't you mixing DNA what with the criminal trial and the civil trial? I never understood which judge/court could proceed with a civil trial after Simpson had been acquitted in criminal court which has a higher level of proof. There should not have been a civil trial.
And yes the EDTA is very problematic, chuckle, chuckle, chuckle. You're such a genius and OJ expert, wish you had been on the prosecution team, the laughs alone would be worth a million bucks.
"Aren't you mixing DNA what with the criminal trial and the civil trial?" *I don't understand your question. Forensic scientists from both trials (who had access to the original blood samples) claimed that the EDTA signatures did not match the vials as the defense's witness suggested. It doesn't really matter anyway seeing as how blood drops that had no EDTA were found next to the dead bodies before forensics showed up. The blood matched OJ's. This alone should be enough for a conviction.*
So obsessed with himself never once gets angry that the " real murderer is still out there "
This interviewer is horribly unprepared. He clearly didn't expect OJ to be as bright as he is.
Kmsl! He was tired of OJ talking. You can hear him sighing in the background. 😂😂😂😂
Yessss!! 😂😂😂😂😂
+TheBerkeleyBeauty To be fair I don't think anyone expected him to be so well spoken and intelligent during this interview.
***** I wasn't being racist I meant you wouldn't expect a footballer to be so well educated or a criminal/murderer either.
***** I know, but I meant the interviewer probably wouldn't have thought this.
“I’m the only one who deserves to be hurt” OJ Simpson talking to detective Lang during the slow speed chase.
OJ is such a damn good liar that's he's almost got me convinced! Totally contradicts himself over and over, talks in circles, evades questions, and shifts blame. Classic narcissist/sociopath.
+Brittany Janes Says he cut his hand in Chicago but when questioned by the police he said he was dropping blood while he was running around packing before his trip. This evidence was not used in the trial! How fucking stupid was Marcia Clark?
'I go to bed at 8:30 EVERY night - therefore, I couldn't have murdered after that time cuz I''m asleep' - Well, I'm sold. That shit's airtight
Maybe he sleepwalked over there
He overslept,was chipping golf balls & was showering: PICK ONE.
Sarcasm
Can you say DEFLECTION? I have never seen anyone skirt the issues like OJ does in these interviews. He always turns the questions back on the interviewer, instead of manning up and answering with a straight response!
Exactly
"I don't know if the L.A.P.D thought I was guilty or not" ! Well they did request you be indicted on double murder. I think that say's something
Him saying the case of the century with a smirk. Creepy as hell
You have to be accountable "WHEN YOU MURDER SOMEONE" What an actor he is, he really should win a trophy for this role!
Maybe hes so good cause he didnt do it, ooohhhh but you cant even fathom that thought, can you simple minded?
Damn, he believes his own lies... @8:25 he almost slipped and said 'GLOVE'!
+TheDurhamBull Yes ,because his lies are LIKE playing Twister.He stumbled on it 2 times.O.J. your TRUTH is showing.
twain103 And then he has the nerve to try and talk like an attorney. SMDH!
TheDurhamBull OH,he learned from the best. The people he chose: Dershowitz,Cochran Jury Consultant Jo-Ellen Dimitris ALL were interviewed about O.J. BEFORE the trial. He MUST have been watching because he put them on his team.
twain103 It's amazing this dude got away with murder. Motive: The love of his life truly moved on and he couldn't handle supporting her financially and seeing someone else enjoy the fruits of his labor. But then the demons haunted him and now he is serving time for a crime he probably should have gotten away with (retrieving something that was taken from him). In the end all was a very sad situation.
TheDurhamBull Look at part 7 at 13:48.He slips and says Sidney knows if her mother is dying & giggling OR rather crying& giggling. The inner O.J. wants to confess.Nicole was 17/18 when they met.She told her male roommate ,he ripped her pants. He THEN set her up into her own apartment.( away from her male friend roommate)Nicole was young, when she met him. If after the divorce she: dated,smoke,drank ,smoked a little weed,etc.She was probably reliving her youth. He got on with his life dating everybody,WHY could'nt she? He has been doing a lot of blaming,accusing people of lying. HAS he EVER shed a tear over ANYONE but himself? The mother of his youngest children,he talks about her death,after her death SO CASUALLY.
Remember he's an experienced actor. As an actor, your job to convince the audience you are a character you're trying to portray. Obviously lots of training and practice
Jussie Smollett thought he was a actor on the stand
He was honest you just can't believe it
Again, quite succinct and thorough with his answers.
This interviewer is GREAT.
O.J totally took control of this weakling's "interview"
That’s what control freaks do!
The worst interviewer ever...was surely hand picked
He PAID this guy to interview him. lol.
He is very engaged in convincing us that he is innocent. I reckon wrongly accused, innocent people don’t need to put on a big show. They don’t need to go into such meandering detail. And their energy would be a lot more subdued.
If America spent this amount of energy trying to repay reparations instead of trying to incriminate black people America would be great for once in its existence
Earlier in this exact interview he said he was doing anything to NOT take a nap before the red eye (going to Burger King). Yet here he claims he was in his bed….BUSTED.
McDonalds.
Its just mind boggling isn't it. I Love this interviewer. He pulled no punches and did not appear to be intimidated in the least by this sick person. He didn't mean to run??! No the fake mustache, gottee and cash were from last years halloween party.
I don't think he nessecarly intended to run. He was suicidal. Thats not a time when you make a lot of decitions. He might have had this stuff in case he wanted to run later. But in the end he didn't needed it.
At 8:25 he stutters and almost says Glove instead of glass when he's talking about supposedly throwing a glass down and trying to clean it up and that's how he cut his finger. People speculated that the cut on his finger came about from the murders, and there wad one glove left at the crime scene thought to be worn by the murderer. It's suspicious to me, like he almost let the truth out for just a second that he got the cut on his finger after he dropped the Glove, not a glass
I noticed that too.
+Brittany Janes Never tripped up your words before? Don't be a human robot like these people on this forum.
@@anthonylewis3095 I agree. He could have just been tripping up his words based on the other stories people have been saying. I'm not saying he's innocent...just that his stuttering is not evidence.
He brought Kato FROM Nicole's home,he was EVEN jealous of him. Kato should think back:When DID O.J. EVER give him the time of day,BEFORE that night? You can BET O.J. had jobs for Kato to do ,while staying at his house it was'nt a free ride.
0:10 Come again OJ? He just got done (7:27 of pt 2) saying he wasn't in bed/asleep prior to the driver Alan Park picking him up that night. In pt 2 of this interview when asked why he lied to the limo driver, who said OJ told him he missed his call because he was asleep. OJ says...
"I never ever, ever said that I was asleep, ever. When I walked outside Kato Kaelin said to me 'Did you oversleep?' I saw in one report that Kato said to Alan Park when he first saw him uh, 'he must have overslept' so I'm assuming with all of this happening Alan Park just assumed I overslept." OJ then goes on to explain that "The main reason I went to McDonald's instead of just having a bowl of cereal is because I was trying to stay awake. It was Kato who had said to me when we returned to my house 'maybe you could take a nap' & I said 'hey, I don't have time to take a nap' & I didn't want to take a nap. I was getting on a Red Eye & if you've ever taken a Red Eye, the last thing I wanted to do was sleep before getting on the Red Eye because I had hoped to be able to sleep on the Red Eye.
Never mind the fact that it doesn't seem plausible that Kato would (knowing OJ was trying to stay awake) ask him if he had overslept. But why, when asked about the time between 9:36 & 10:53 that is unaccounted for, would OJ respond that he usually goes to bed around 8:30 by the clock every day? Taken in context, this makes no sense to me.
Your narrative makes no sense, OJ's comments were perfectly intelligible, I understood every word he said. You on the other hand..........
This is America! There will never be a time without black and white racism
💯💯 It's what this country was built on and it's getting worse.
True. What does that have to do with this murder case? Where there's a significant amount of evidence that the person is guilty?
@@mxsade88 by black people only.
“ I was depressed. “
Of course you were depressed. You brutally killed 2 people!
I believe that...in fact im convinced that OJ believes that the victims committed double suicide!!!!
OK, for me, here's the thing. It's not what he is saying, it's what he is NOT saying. If ANY man was in that situation, wife murdered, he didn't do it. ANY man would be asking first and foremost "What is being done to catch the real murderer(s)" He did not post any reward, he did not hire any private investigators, did not apply pressure to the DA or LAPD. Just seems wrong to me..
at 8:25 he slips up and confesses…
OJ cut his finger with the knife when he removed his tight fitting GLOVE, dropping the GLOVE after slicing his middle finger.
He was then forced to quickly leave the scene, leaving the evidence behind, since it would be a time consuming risk to try to locate the knit cap and the GLOVE by groping in the dark on the ground because the dog would not cease wailing. The anecdote he cut his middle finger on a GLASS in Chicago is not only in itself inconsistent with statements made under interrogation, but it is the essential and pivotal lie of the whole storyline. For the precise reason of being conscious and aware that even the prosecution inaccurately bound the events and findings together of how the episode played out, does he not only lean forward to bring the issue up for a rehearsed clarification, but in the process of upholding the weight of the lie, he subconsciously lets out the truth which slips into the forefront of his mind, as he unwittingly confesses at 8:25.
Finally an eye witness. Where were you when we needed you? You cheated us out of our fun (OJ fried in the electric chair) after we waited an entire year for the "thumbs down" signal.
Damn you.
No he told police he cut it playing golf and stuff and reopened it in Chicago. Blatant bull
The crucial thing is no witnesses on his flight to Chicago or at LAX where he was signing autographs saw any cut(s) on Simpson's hand. No blantant bull that's what they testified under oath.
+Jack Johnson He said he cut it to police and then re-opened it in Chicago when he heard about Nicole (lol). He bled all over the murder scene, the glove and all over his bronco and his house. He uses all his lawyer's bullshit in this interview... There was a conspiracy, planted blood, planted gloves. He is a lying psycho and could fundamentally not care about another person. Nicole was a trainwreck herself and the results are visible to all.
+NJA1039 You guys keep retailing the same old debunked theories. Don't you even watch the video's you're commenting on? It's mind boggling to read the same mechanically delivered falsehoods over and over and over again. None of your statements are true and it's knowable b you that you're repeated known lies...so why, why, why do you types continue to repeat these lies and then act as if you know them to be true, especially when anyone that wants to know can know that you're lying. It should be embarrassing to you to be such a moron.
Guilty, guilty, guilty my oh my this guy is just unreal...
The way he maintains his innocence and acts so calmly in these interviews really has me thinking it's possible that he is indeed innocent. But the evidence just says the complete opposite.
He is just a master deceiver.
Which evidence ? U mean the pictures of those blood drops they clicked at Rockingham after they collected his blood ? Or the sock with blood which wasn’t there when they start the camera & appears magically 3 mins later ? Or the glove that obviously wasn’t his? Ever heard of a killer leaving a glove at the crime scene & another one at his property while carefully destroying everything else ? Is it possible for the glove to have just drops of blood after stabbing 2 people multiple times & slashing their throats ??? Common sense isn’t really common I guess.
@@PhenomenalDiva how do you explain the victims being found inside his car AND home?
@@MoneyOverFame I already answered u, whatever they claimed to have found was just a ‘claim’. Pictures were taken only & only after they collected his blood when he returned from Chicago.
Now u tell me , how do u explain the fact that they didn’t submit the blood or anything they collected from OJ’s house to the forensic team/lab on the same day & why Van Hatter took it home & submitted only 36 hrs later. When asked under oath if he’s ever done this during any of his other cases , he says a no & has no explanation as to why he did that in OJs case .
@@MoneyOverFame u should watch the trial (the entire trial is uploaded here on RUclips )
Also do read Nicole’s best friends testimony during OJ’s civil trial here simpson.walraven.org/cf_depo1.html
Only a guilty conscious would want you to run from the cops and make an attempt to commit suicide. Those are the actions of a GUILTY person.
agreed... guilty or not how the hell does he smile talking about this while pathetically defending himeself whilest 2 people died in all this...
I can't stop saying "shut the fuck up OJ" as I watch this interview
“I wanna take some time with Faye Resnick” Yeah OJ, I bet you do.... smh
The more he talks the more he is GUILTY
My sentiments exactly!! He is so full of BS
Wrong.
Its crazy how he went on tv w all this w out a lawyer present and answered every question asked w out a glitch
8:25 - there is your glitch
imagine if he did not do it how unjust the world is.
+Heywould Jablowme yeah, well you can forget him not doing it
Heywould Jablowme shut up
He's a very scary dude. The eyes don't lie
+Max V World Empty, aren't they? What do you see in them?
I don't see anything in them. He's very cold in this interview. I never seen anyone who has an answer for everything.
Max V World I know right? So eloquent. So lucid...
Remember, he was a paid actor as well. So he picked up a few things along his thespian endeavors lol
Max V World Nah I think he's a natural. If you're a good liar, you know one when you see one. Lying is an art, if you will. Acquired throughout the years...it's not acting. He sucks at acting, as he lacks basic focal emphasis. He emphasizes the irrelevant parts.He has a blank expression most of the times and then he throws some facial expressions when stating irrelevant stuff, like in the previous video when he said that the neighbors sent food to the house and he frowned, trying to bring attention to that detail. As if it mattered what that the neighbors were nice towards him...when we all know that typically abusers are not known to be abusers outside of the family. However...even though he sucks at acting, he has mastered lying and deviating, and most of all...dissociating. He is totally dissociated from the time and place where the interview is happening. If you dissociate you can do pretty much anything and recite anything. His face is relaxed...you can tell tha tin his mind he is in his "happy place". This is something learnt in a person's first years of life. I talk from personal experience.
Best Interview Ever!
A Detective would never tell a potential suspect that the victim was murdered.
He actually wasn't a suspect at that time. In fact it was assumed he was actually already in Chicago when the murderers took place. It wasn't until they realised he was still in Rockingham at that time that's when they began to suspect him.
@@sotyfan73 I said "Potential Suspect." when murders happen, anybody in the relation to the victims, is a "Potential Suspect." and again the L.A.P.D. would never tell a "Potential Suspect." the cause of the victims deaths.
It makes me sick also that after he murders their mother and her friend, he's spending time with the kids and they have no idea
Well they have an idea NOW 😔
He was well prepped for this interview
In order to Furhman to plant the glove at OJs house at 5:00am that would mean Furhman would have to know OJ was cut on his left side. That's not possible because Furhman never saw OJ until later in the afternoon. So no way Fuhrman can Not plant that glove at OJs without knowing if OJ is injured or not
Guilty or Not Guilty.... How does he smile at all on this matter? Its Devestating..
Guilty ... OJ is just a good manipulator and his defence team took advantage of the events of the time I wish they could do a re trial
Boy, he sure now has his story perfected with years of practice. Watch the video the lost confession tape done before the hired lawyers prepped him to compare his answers.
This guy is a fantastic actor!
I am not white neither black...just look in his arrogance...he commit those horrible murders
He sounds innocent , looks innocent , act's innocent , most importantly the jury said he was innocent.
No they didn’t say he was innocent they said “not guilty” “there is a HUGE difference,not guilty basically means “not proven” not necessarily that he’s truly innocent,because as anyone with a brain knows it’s impossible for him to be innocent!
I wonder if he feels "Black" again 🥱
OK. This guy is lying. When he says that he didn t Run. Come on man. Give me a break.
This is like Bundy's last interview with Dobson only it's OJ instead of Ted.
Denise...Denise...Denise. What out Denise. Pray O. J. never gets out.
You know, for majority of this interview, I really do want to believe him because he is so well spoken and convincing. He chuckles and smiles often after he speaks to make the person feel like he's an okay guy, shows no obvious signs of being a mad man like watching an interview like with a truly deranged person and I've seen a few online, but his demeanor is what makes the vibe you get from him very chilling. The man asked O.J 'why did you run?'. O.J said so many excuses...he wanted to go to the cemetery, he was on medication with side effects, it's not true bc I would've saved more money blah blah blah. An innocent man doesn't lead a police following like that, I'm sorry.
you really want to believe him, because he wants you to believe him. He is a sociopath and those people are brilliant in manipulating others.
So the overwhelming circumstantial evidences is not enough to see he was not guilty. It’s so impossible that innocent people run away. Smh. It’s almost like we would believe him if he said he did it, which means we have already made up in our minds before the matter. The media has done an amazing job with creating the story.
I was at peace wtf? In his jeep driving at 70mph with the cops chasing him and a gun in the car??!! He lies through his teeth and always skirts around the questions asked!!
He was at peace when driving to the cementary. Afterwards the chase started and his mood changed.
He said he broke the glass in the kitchen here but in a different interview said it was in the bedroom so which one was it? That's just one of the plethora of questions I'd like to ask him.
In the beginning of the video, the interviewer asks him of his whereabouts, he kept looking to the right... everytime he says "home".'
Is it me? This guys seems like a good guy. I don’t believe he did anything. He seems genuine, I fell sorry for him. I don’t know much about him, but he seems innocent and a good guy.
I watched a lot of OJ interviews. Gotta respect how he pisses all over the interviewers. He commited a double murder. DNA science today would have put him behind bars along with cctv
When someone is guilty they will talk and talk and try to make you think other wise just like oj he will change the subject and try to get around the actual question smh
Wow. O.J. Simpson was a handsome man and I never realized just how much until watching this vide. I remember Suzanne Somers saying he was a handsome man when her husband mentioned she was too rapped up in the OJ Simpson case. Even though he's in his late 60s now he STILL is an impressive looking man. And he comes across as a heart & soul man. Not a PERFECT man, but a good family man.
To me he comes across as a narcissist and a psychopath. You were right that he's very handsome. But you also think he's a good family man? Really? He cut the throat of his children's mother! Just so you know - that's a bad thing to do!
Sophie Stevenson Prove he did that...
Wow. OJ did not kill Nicole. Were YOU there? Or are you like all the other OJ-accusers engaging in WISHFUL THINKING.....ONLY.
CDubs HasIt Huh? You have no clue what it is you are talking about. Know the case, understand what it is you are commenting on. You said…" EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there." You couldn't be any more incorrect. EDTA is also found in detergents, soaps, food, paint,etc. Now, the levels of EDTA in test tubes is extremely high. The levels found in our bodies, test extremely lower compared to the tubes (sometimes not even showing up). The EDTA found in the blood at the scene tested extremely low, because it was already in the blood stream. Having said that, if you were to conclude, as you do, that since EDTA was found in SOME blood samples, that makes OJ innocent….then surely, by definition, the FACT that there was no EDTA in the 5 blood drops leading away from the bodies would make OJ guilty. Pick a stance, you can't have it both ways. You pick first, then I will destroy whatever point you make. See, these things are not my opinion, they are fact. They cannot be disputed. By the way, the jury did not hear every shred of evidence. Do you just pull sh*t out of the sky and start typing? Wow.
OJ Simpson is almost 70 yrs. old. WHO CARES how much he weighs??? I know Simpson is not even focused on his looks but focusing on getting out of jail. A jail he should not be in @ all. OJ Simpson WILL BE FREE ONE DAY SOON. Hopefully you will be happy for him.
He certainly didn’t do himself any favors in this interview lol
I believe OJ. Everyone in Chicago saw the injury. People on the plane saw it on his way from Chicago.
It’s fairly amazing to me that in LA of all places there were no traffic cameras or whatever to capture his vehicle going to and from the scene. Things have changed a lot since 1994 I guess....
There was one woman, who claimed to see OJ in the bronco rushing back to his home, her name was Jill Shively but the prosecution dumped her as a witness after learning she did an interview before testifying. Her testimony would have placed OJ leaving Bundy around 10:50. (If I remember correctly).
Anybody else notice every question he's asked starts with O.J. asking questions about the posed question? Why not just answer the questions? Oh yeah, I forgot, he's fucking guilty.
if he was indeed guilty; he could flat out say he was guilty.. why go to this trouble after a trial has set him free and never could be tried again? EDTA was found in multiple blood samples from the scene, the house, AND the bronco; EDTA is used in forensics to keep blood samples from clotting..that chemical can only appear if someone puts it there... we've never been told the complete story..
Really? Thats you're thoughts on this. Did it ever occur to you that by admitting it he would be even more hated than he is now.
Really; the jury, based on the 'facts' presented had no choice but to let him go; and if people would look into it theyd see why they let him go and it wasnt because of "an all black jury"... there was indeed planted evidence by a severely racist detective.. as I said EDTA doesnt just show up out of nowhere... but why would he care if people hated him? He doesnt benefit monetarily from those folks who might hate him... he could admit it right on the spot if he were guilty but I really think this was a railroaded wealthy black man by a police department with a horrible horrible track record of mistreating black folks: the LAPD... watch the "BBC Oj Simpson: The Untold Story" on here on youtube, and it may open your eyes to some things you've never been told...
Railroaded, perhaps. Deservedly so you might add.
Im never going to claim that Simpson is a great man.. I just find some things a little fkn fishy.. I always thought he was guilty..since I was a little fellow I thought he was guilty but I got on here and watched that documentary and Im at about 50% he did it; 50% he didnt do it.. so I just think the jury got it right based on what was presented..
That's one heck of an interviewer there.
THIS IS A 3 HOUR INTERVIEW WITH 3 HOURS AND 58 MINUTES OF ALL OJ...AND 2 MINUTES OF NICOLE BEING MURDERED 😳
if you use your brain, you can hear him trip over and over again and again with his lies. hes constantly trying to convince he is not lying..ie hes lying
It's a complex case, the cops may have been dirty, the prosecution was incompetent... There may have been another individual involved to some extent ... But at the end of the day... He's fucking GUILTY
and if he's lying here, he's a fucking genius. He is VERY sincere, convincing and consistent. He's certainly got his own story straight with itself, and straight with the facts of the case.
I'm not being sarcastic, it's genuinely fascinating, and chilling if he's guilty.
Personally I think he probably is guilty... but legally... "reasonable doubt" - that's a tricky one.
Cant fool you
Paul Higgins of course he does... he's been through a year long trial with a team of clever defense lawyers... he'd been practicing these answers for months and months!
Eva Czopek
Mostly he's making a point , trying to get the viewers to think. He isn't answering a multiple choice test with answers drilled to him over and over again.
Like when he said "when does a man have to account for his time when he is in his home"? Makes sense to me.
This case stunk from the beginning. No evidence what so ever. A barking dog, c'mon.
He made himself believe that he’s innocent thats why it sounds convincingly
Old trick to stop bleeding of cuts, push skin together hold, superglue, wait 3 seconds, wound closed, no bleeding... most people keep in the utility drawer in their kitchens. They also found his blood on sheets and pillow case in Chicago, and believe no blood on the broken glass. If he cut himself after the call and getting ready to immediately leave for LA why did he go back to bed.
What’s the name of this movie?
Never saw anybody trying so hard to prove innocence!
This reminds me of "Gone Girl "
@5:50 OJ has an opportunity to acknowledge a possible conspiracy by LAPD against him, yet he disavows that possibility. Yet in order to maintain he's innocent, he HAS TO SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPLAIN that his blood was planted by LAPD. That kind of inconsistency lends to credibility and guilt.
Let me offer this, when the police called him in Chicago, and told him his wife was dead, he says " I know they weren't playing" how did he know that, also he never said how did she die, Mr Simpson was involved in the murder, Det Furhman did transfer those gloves back to Rockingham, to make certain he didn't get away with it.
He said in another interview that he slammed the glass cup down in the hotel bathroom and that's when it broke. SUCH A LIAR!!! WOW
T Spires-No one saw him bleeding on the way to the airport.No blood found in the Limousine.
His personality is self centered and dominant - not uncommon. He lacks people skills, but that personality type attracts so called "friends" - they are more like "followers" than friends. Compare his personality to Donald Trump. Robert Kardashian relationship was as a O.J. follower. That's why the friends (followers) are so easy to turn their backs when O.J.'s life when down. His long term fame may have created this egotistical personality.
OJ- why do I have to tell u where I was while my ex was being murdered
Obviously he was guilty but the defense was so good and the prosecution so bad that the not guilty verdict was the correct one.
You think the prosecution was inept because there was an acquittal? That's how our system is supposed to function "beyond a reasonable doubt" and there was nothing but reasonable doubt in this case, in fact it was a joke.
Jack Johnson Yeah thats exactly what I think. The evidence is so overwhelming that he's guilty, that onlt only a retarded prosecution could fuck it up. If youve got the victims blood in his car and home andd still cant get a conviction, you should look for a new job
The jury disagreed with you. OJ killed no one so now how do you explain the so called blood evidence?
@@Jim_Harwood that prosecutor team was awful.
@@Jim_Harwood the jury acquitted because of Rodney King.
Sweet laptop....we went from big to small to big to small.
Blantant lie, the cops told O.J Nicole was dead, not murdered O.J contradicts every fact in this case. O.J never asked the W questions just my kids where are mt kids.
Those helicopters in background is funny
One thing I've noticed watching this again....his eyes are shifty as fuck. He is CONSTANTLY looking from side to side.
+Mitch Farkas That doesn't mean anything really. I am a great liar and one method I use when I lie is look people directly in the eyes intensely and I try to not move much. However, when I am not lying, generally I look in different directions trying to remember things or recall images. In conclusion though, I sometimes do that when I lie too. So...you can pin point the main constants, but you never know how well one can bend his personality and reactions.
+Sorryscene I'm sorry I don't believe you. You just admitted you are a liar. ppfftt lmao
Youwouldthink shh LoL.
Trademark sign of the personality disorder he has (NPD).
This is a master class in gaslighting.
Creepy that he laughs during the murder conversation.
This should not have happened to OJ! He should sue the state of California for defamation!
"Not one person other than Denise Brown has come forward to allege that I was ever physically abusive--and they need the money."
what were you doing though OJ between 9.36 and 10.53?! you say you were home, what were you doing? simple. and the interviewer lets him get away with not answering.
Why doesn't OJ declare that I am an innocent man accused of a crime I did not commit?????? He just talks about himself way too much to be innocent.
the interviewer was so ill prepared lol! what a joke smh
"Favorite person".... really ? Nicole was his "favorite person"
THe kids were "happy"... OMG
So in this part he in my eyes might as well be talking with Casey Anthony.lets see how part 5 is
Its really sad, because I belive a lot he is saying. But then hes getting angry when asked about an alibi and has no answer for it...
evil..look in his eyes..
Why does OJ talk in the 3rd person??????????
Cuz hes the juice
There’s way more to this case than what we’ve been told … guilty or not . It’s a lot more than an obsessed ex husband stalker killing his ex and her friend in a fit of jealous rage … of course my dumb ass don’t know what it is… but there’s more . And the cops the city oj , everyone doesn’t want any light shed on more than the brutal murders .
by the way OJs talking bout how he signed autographs at the airport, and wasnt bandaged up, and as he was signing all these autographs at the airport, problably 2 or 3 at max, the people woulda noticed it!!! BULLLSHIT! ya wanna know why?? cause HE WAS CUT ON HIS LEFT HAND, AND OJ,s RIGHT HANDED!! LOL, so he woulda been signing those autographs at the airport, the night of the murders with his non cut RIGHT HAND!!! What a joke!!! a 10 year old could pick this guy apart, and thats why he NEVER took the stand!!!
I don't know whether he did it or not but I do believe he knows who did it and was at the crime scene after. He is probably trying to protect who ever did it. It could be his oldest son hence the same "blood" as him. Maybe? No one really knows 100% the truth.
+Cynthia Bouabre DNA evidence showed that there was a 1 in 9.7 Billion chance it was someone else's blood.
Those helicopters bro lol😂😂😂😂😂
Uh let me see if I have this correct. He WASN'T looking to do himself in but what does it mean when someone has a gun to their head? And he DID say on an interview program (I think it was a program in the UK called The Richard and Judy Show) that he pulled the trigger.
what are you talking about?