That story by Gil Garcetti about Jimmy Carter and how he called the verdict in mid trial, his spot on analysis of race dynamics and how it would play out was brilliant.
8:20 Damn that's deep. I know two friends who visit Ga every year to spend time with the Carters and build communities. They deeply love them and consider them the most unassuming and non celebrity celebrities they have ever met. That story says a lot about Gil, the Carters and us as Americans.
What about the eyewitness that saw OJ minutes after the murders leaving the scene. Documented call to police and license plate. Never brought up in trial. Outrageous!
Everybody thought Garcetti moved the trial downtown because he didnt want to lose the black vote so its interesting to find out now that it wasnt actually his call.
Mr P Franklin he uses excuses for that. He could have moved it after the grand jury but wanted better “optics” meaning black people. Don’t be fooled, he should have and could have put this trial in its correct jurisdiction. There was enough undamaged space to try it in its proper place and where OJ would have gotten a jury of HIS peers. He wanted his constituents to have the trial of the century in their patch. It was ALL ABOUT THE VOTES. Don’t be fooled.
I still wondering why AC Cowlings never testified or why was he never subpoenaed? There's video of him at Nicole's memorial service bawling in tears so he def had a bond with Nicole.
That's a great question. I always wondered that myself. He was subpoenaed for the civil trial and provided testimony. But he only had actual information about the domestic violence, not the murders.
@@danieldougan269 Ron Shipp and Denise Brown had information about the domestic violence and they both testified. Cowlings was part of the Bronco chase, which was presented at the Civil trial and was probably more relevant. Funny how I never noticed that AC Cowlings wasn't called to testify about that.
The prosecution did the best possible job that they could..Darden as a Co* prosecutor was an extremely poor choice..once he entered the team, they were put at a crucial/ substantial dis advantage, however, the jury actually did not not the prosecutions case..they immensely loved oj Simpson, everybody LOVED oj...it did appear like the juice may have been guilty, although, once Cochran and Scheck joined the team, they were taken to another level...great cohesiveness and team chemistry developed quickly.
@@daviddavis3389 I do think he did it but Mark Fuhrman's chicanery sat him free. Think about what he was thinking during the trial. When you know you did it, and a team of brilliant lawyers who some of them may believe you, masterfully defend you, you are gaslighted to believe in your own innocence!! That's a feeling no one felt except OJ. 🤷🏽♂️ That's why he babbles a lot.
Marcia was an “excellent lawyer” who didn’t bother to use the available evidence in the trial. Didn’t introduce the letters or the fact that he fled with a disguise. Didn’t mention Jill Shively reporting his license plate as he drove home erratically after the murders.
Marcia Clark was a Scientologist, her husband Gordon Clark was a high ranking Scientologist. OJ Simpson had been a Scientologist as was Greta Van Susterren(sp?) who was a part of the FAKE NEWS. By the way Charles Manson was a Scientologist.
@@apebitmusic83 It shows how little you actually think. The prosecution said OJ committed the murders at 10:35 pm and we know from testimony he was back at his Rockingham home getting into a limo, with his luggage and he was clean as a whistle at 10:54 pm. Therefore if OJ was the killer he only had 19 minutes to get rid of the murder weapon, shoes, clean up, and get into the limo. It is impossible for LAPD not to have found the knife and the shoes with that small window of time afforded Simpson. IMPOSSIBLE And if you cant follow what I am showing you then you're too far gone. And dont tell me he tossed the evidence away at the airport or Chicago as both lies were debunked years ago. But that's why Garcetti wont talk about the lack of murder weapon or shoes. He knew the case against Simpson was fake.
@@Jim_Harwood How little I think?. :eyeroll. You’ve got it all figured out. That’s why 99.9% of legal experts say that OJ got away with murder (not an exact stat but I’m sure it’s close). Shows you how illogically you think.
@@apebitmusic83 Yeah roll your eyes genius. You just insulted yourself when you admitted "experts" do your thinking for you. Besides those so called experts were witnesses to nothing. And the defense presented experts that totally destroyed the fake narrative and the 12 jurors debunked all media persons spreading fake news.. But it's so simple any non brainwashed person could figure it out that Simpson was innocent--there is no murder weapon or shoes? I told you before and it is in the record. Prosecutors said Simpson started his two person kill spree at 10:35 pm and we know he entered the limo to LAX at 10:54 pm. He had luggage was cleanly dressed and he was ready to go. If he were the killer then LAPD would have found the knife and shoes! You still wont get what I am saying. There is not sufficient time to keep these items safe and LAPD knows where he was at 10:54 pm while they claim he was at Bundy at 10:35 pm. So genius seeing they know where he was at both 10:35 and 10:54 then where could he hide the murder weapon. See how easy it was for LAPD to find the knife if Simpson were the killer and yet 27 years later still no knife! Yeah them experts they're real sharp, like Simpson's missing knife.
And you wanna know why the Prosecutors never introduced a murder weapon? Because then forensic test would prove there was two knives used in the murder--Oh,oh...pull the TV plug, Charles Manson and David Berkowitz are calling they have a new plan to keep the cover up in place !
I’m not sure I believe that it wasn’t his choice to hold the case downtown vs Santa Monica. He was the DA of LA, he definitely had the power to move it if he was concerned about not getting a fair trial like it wound up being.
He was trying to install confidence back into the community with that comment. However, there is a difference between "powerful" and "best". Just here in Australia we have a better criminal justice system, better health system, better welfare, more affordable higher education, less disparity between rich and poor, better minimum wage, I can go on. People don't work 3 jobs and still live below the poverty line in Australia. Then there's the guns...........
Australia is "owned" by the British Empire. You clowns aren't even called "citizens", you're called "subjects" as your subjects of the Queen, who is the sovereign. Go sell it somewhere else.
Jack Johnson Oh please, you really don't agree with him? Everything he said is true, our justice system convicts innocent people and let's the guilty go free based on their economic status, our minimum wage isn't enough for people to rent a crappy apartment, and our healthcare system costs too much for most people to even go to the doctor. And we obviously have a major gun violence issue. The truth hurts sometimes.
they all came to the realization that he did it . Did you see Al Cowlings around towards the end of his life ? did you see anyone that he had known befpre? At some point in time their access to him - he exposed in some way or another that he did it and he was just moving on like it never happened .
Wow that hit home when Gil Garcetti said that the sentence that O.J. got for the crime he committed in NV was over the top & not real justice if you look at it really look at it he's 100% right 33 years for what he did or was involved in was just outrageous I didn't feel sorry for him either but that was crazy...
5:47 is the part to watch. Jimmy Carter was a great President, but he is also a great human being. I sincerely love him, and I want everyone to know how good he is.
@@sareight , I disagree. He was better than any other President of the last 50 years. The American people didn't deserve him, truthfully, and they proved it.
@@BBBoggs There isn’t anyone with common sense that thinks he was a good President. He is widely known as one of the worst. Not just my opinion but an opinion held by an overwhelming majority and historians. His list of failures was long.
There will never again be a case like this again. Bloody finger print and the gloves are a peace of History and burno molly shoes. We're enough to put oj away.
Amazing how intelligent people can look past obvious facts . We all know gloves don’t slip off easily , but why if one glove comes off at crime scene would the killer decide to take off the other glove at Simpson’s home . If it was Oj he could have thrown the glove anywhere, why drop it at his house ?
chris m - You've come to conclusions that aren't obvious at all. Just look at the facts. The left glove, measured in court, was 5/8ths of an inch shorter than the right. The shorter the glove the easier it would come off. Speculation/inference: the left glove came off in the struggle when Ron tried to free himself from OJS. No evidence was presented a glove was "thrown" anywhere. The matching right glove was found in the pathway behind OJS's house. Speculation/inference: OJS dropped the glove where it was eventurally found and wasn't aware he had lost it. When he realized he didn't have it he didn't know where he dropped it. The path behind his home is pitch black at night, no lights at all. If you know the facts presented about the gloves used during the murders, and have a good understanding of mathematical probability, you would know that the gloves found at Bundy and Rockingham are OJS's. There isn't one piece of evidence to support the glove being planted by Mark Fuhrman. The idea was ingenious, but its without proof, which doesn't seem to make a difference to a lot of people. ~ ~
Also, if it was OJ, had his kids awoken you'd have to believe he'd be willing to 'Do Away' with them too. His own children. The whole story they've relentlessly pushed at this case has been.. 'everyone knows he's guilty', like if they say it enough times it'll stick. Not only was evidence twisted at the time, but after they lost the case, they've made up all kinds of excuses that they tag on. Thinking those who've not seen the trial in it's entirety will be none the wiser.
@@NeverGiddy bro my issue is you know you have corrupt officers all over the case and with evidence also all over the crime scene and expect people to trust the evidence
@@alind1611 - I am presuming you are very familiar with this trial. Please list all of the "corrupt officers" who were involved in this case that have made you doubt the integrity of the evidence.
Yes; very interesting. "Garcetti was born in Los Angeles, the son of Salvador Garcetti, and Juanita Iberri. His father was born in Parral, Chihuahua, Mexico, and brought to the United States as a child after his own father, Massimo Garcetti, (a judge, and immigrant) to Mexico from Italy, was hanged during the Mexican Revolution. Gil's mother was born in Arizona, one of nineteen children born to a father whose parents were from Sonora, Mexico, and a mother born in Arizona, to Mexican parents." Gilbert Salvador Iberri Garcetti (born August 5, 1941)
Garcetti's office and its incompetence lost a very winnable case by deciding to leave out several very key pieces of evidence because they were afraid the LAPD would be scrutinized too much by the jury, and they were erroneously over confident that they had plenty for a conviction with the blood evidence alone. The murderer got off due to the utter incompetence of the prosecution and its "leadership". He's lying through his teeth about "not remembering the specifics" about what they decided to bring to trial. They, as in HIS office, decided to not introduce the slow speed chase and the conversation between him and Lange DURING the chase which was recorded, and also the interview Lange and Vannatter had with Simpson the day after the murders where he changes his story three times during the fifty five minute interview about how he cut his finger. Don't let him BS you. This is ALL documented.
They had the blood. They had the domestic violence history. They even showed a video of him working out and making a joke about beating his wife. They had Allan Park’s testimony. They had Kato’s testimony. He had no alibi from 9:30pm until 11pm ish. Ron Shipp testified that OJ told him that he had dreams of killing Nicole. What the heck more do you need? People have been put to death for 10 percent of that. They had more than enough evidence It’s just that the defense created that reasonable doubt with Mark Fuhrman and the criminalist mishandling the evidence. The defense did everything in their natural power to make sure he was acquitted and they achieved it. Even if it meant playing the “race card”.
That’s what got Simpson acquitted, the failure of the lapd and the prosecution to realize how big the case was, instead the cops/detectives were torn apart and the prosecution looked like first year law students
DA is a political job - it is not about prosecuting people - imagine overseeing 1100 lawyers ? no way someone could do that and prosecute a high profile case .
It took the jury 35 minutes to find OJ innocent because all the so-called evidence have been debunked. At the end, there was zero evidence against OJ. The frame job had failed. So Plan B was just try to say the defense use a race card and that’s why they won.
It clearly seems OJ committed the double homicides given the facts his blood sample being on the crime scene, the written suicidal letter, the low-speed chase and so on. However the mishandling of the evidence, the lies of Furhman and Vennatter, the unfitting gloves have put in the mind of everyone a “reasonable doubt” As the prosecution had the burden of proof and therefore was meant to prove its allegations beyond a reasonable doubt which it failed OJ got away with it. Though to my point of view the race of the jurors has played a non important role of the decision cause up till now the REASONABLE DOUBT prevails.
They asked 1 of the jurors why did it only take yall 4 hours to come up with a verdict! the Juror asks the interviews "how many days were we sequestered? the interviewer says 267 days ...the juror then says She (we) has 266 days to think about the case !" this is what we did and had to do every single night for nearly 9 mos! no TV no contact with any family members no phones calls no nothing! for 9 mos f your job! f your kids f your loved ones! just this case all day n all night for 9 mons so idk why Gil thought they was gonna all of a sudden sit around n rehash for another week or so again!
Omg, if he grew up near USC and if he stayed close to that community he had to know how deep our distrust of the police. LAPD is so racist---they could be from Mississippi.
Vumilia A man came forward saying that h saw OJ toss stuff in the garbage but not sure 🤔 it was at the airport. I don’t how that man can live with himself knowing he took his children’s mom away from them in such a brutal way!!🤢🤮😢😡
margarita ochoa he blacked out and can’t remember. He thinks it was someone else. If you listen to his confession he blames it one someone with him named Charle. Several people have said OJ talks as a third person all the time. In the meal line he’d say “OJ is going to have a double portion of meatloaf today”. He’s a real nut job. He thinks he didn’t do it.
His comment on the knife being discovered 20 years later. "We did an exhaustive search. It made no impact on me". Well, apparently your guys missed a knife Gil. What else did they miss?
@@raygordon3728 how would they have any evidence linking Jason to the murders when all they cared about was evidence to link OJ to the murders. Why did Jason forge his time card at work the night of the murders?
I believe the only thing they reviewed was Allan Park’s testimony (some of it). And that, to me, is the closest thing they had to a witness and I believe every word he said. But for the jury, it wasn’t enough to convict.
@@Andrea-ue7gv Well 1, DNA was relatively new in court cases in 1995 and 2, Barry Scheck exposed the criminalists for their poor handling of the evidence and raised enough doubt for there to be cross contamination. Barry Scheck destroyed Dennis Fung on the stand. Barry showed actual video footage of Dennis not wearing gloves during collection of evidence. Which Dennis admitted was wrong
Other factors to look into . And the lapd won’t coz they have egg on their face. But other factors would be what blood type is jason Simpson? Type B , as found under Nicole Brown Simpson nails which didn’t match oj or Ron Goldman, did what’s his name, the guy with blonde hair and beard that was mentioned of maybe killing them , he was a painter and did he work on Simpson’s house when Nicole redecorated it , we will never know.
I get it if you want to say in a 'Legal sense" he was found "not guilty" by a jury of our peers but that martin sheen documentary claiming o.j.`s son killed ron and nicole is a farce! We need to stop living in a make believe world and start dealing with reality. There is no aboninable snowman or bigfoot either. Geeze!
@@winycityfightfan Jason Simpson fits the profile of the murderer: he's a chef with knife skills, military past and rage issues. He had previously attacked other people with knife: his boss and two girlfriends.
@@winycityfightfan no one ever touched the moon, witches, aliens, yetis, don't exist, don't think atom's been split [scienfically impossible], a i d s not an std, nor is h i v, lots of massive lies from our TV machine ay? 100 years of absolute propaganda! to keep our tax dollars rollin in :(
That caller was right theres no way Oj could’ve committed those murder physically with a scratch on him whoever did it had some marks on them because Ron Goldman fought back
“The office employs roughly 1,000 deputy district attorneys, nearly 300 investigators and about 800 support personnel, comprising the largest local prosecutorial agency in the nation.”
He’s a professional photographer now, he’s allowed to dress weird imo... what I have an issue with is that set, those chairs and that desk just look so awkward and uninviting 🤣😂whoever decorated in there should be fired
Sorry Gil, you and the OJ prosecutors did a disservice to the detective's working with you. You knew the Furhman tapes were taken out of context and you did nothing to stop it from being blown out of proportion by the defense and ruining their careers. Now, you are blithering on a talk show. Is there no end to how far you will stoop.
Agreed Furhman was reading a script which could easily be proven.they could have brought up cases of African Americans who were murdered that he solved. The entire prosecution were idiots.
I can listen to a man that's fair... I think this ex DA. Gave some truth. At the End Justice Got back at OJ... In people wonder why minorities don't trust them or the institution...
@@wyzmann32 You Must be nuts. I do think OJ did it but Mark Fuhrman's chicanery sat him free. Think about what he was thinking during the trial. When you know you did it, and a team of brilliant lawyers who some of them may believe you, masterfully defend you, you are gaslighted to believe in your own innocence!! That's a feeling no one felt except OJ. 🤷🏽♂️ That's why he babbles a lot.
What's your hang up with Mexican people!!! You are starting to sound like a bonafide Racist...this is at least the 2nd time that you've brought up Mr Garceti's ethnicity.
@@joeorlando9140 "His paternal grandmother, Juanita Iberri, was born in Arizona, one of 19 children born to an immigrant father from Sonora, Mexico, and an Arizona-born mother whose father and mother were both Mexican. Garcetti's maternal grandparents were Russian Jewish immigrants."
@@michaeln7443 not race, it's just skin tone, ethnicity, all humans are one race, homo sapiens, our DNA matches, we all come from African Women, according to science, hate is Divide & Conquer tactics employed by the 5000 super rich families who control earth
Don't care that you grew up in a house. Don't care if you grew up in a racially mixed environment. The fact is that you lost the biggest murder trial that you will ever come across. Take a seat.
Wow what an absolute awesome talk about Jimmy Carter
Gil Garceti looks like central casting for a California DA.
This guys choice of cloths is bizarre.
Come out already
That’s what I was thinking good adjective
Thats what living in California does to a man.
Man?…
Bizarre, though cheerful,
and lively.☺️
That story by Gil Garcetti about Jimmy Carter and how he called the verdict in mid trial, his spot on analysis of race dynamics and how it would play out was brilliant.
The future will be amazed by Jimmy Carter.
Carter was not the President,Bill Clinton was.
Obama and Biden destroyed all the work in bringing Black and White people closer.
8:20 Damn that's deep. I know two friends who visit Ga every year to spend time with the Carters and build communities. They deeply love them and consider them the most unassuming and non celebrity celebrities they have ever met. That story says a lot about Gil, the Carters and us as Americans.
OJ Made in America is a must watch.
Yep a great series
Jimmy Carter... He was Prez-O-Dent for a reason. They guy knows America
What about the eyewitness that saw OJ minutes after the murders leaving the scene. Documented call to police and license plate. Never brought up in trial. Outrageous!
nobody is arguing if he did it anymore. safe your what ifs
@@johnmason1648 I appreciate the advice
Yeah the prosecution blew it and the jury was terrible
Wow President Carter knew!
Interesting, hey?
Everybody thought Garcetti moved the trial downtown because he didnt want to lose the black vote so its interesting to find out now that it wasnt actually his call.
Mr P Franklin he uses excuses for that. He could have moved it after the grand jury but wanted better “optics” meaning black people. Don’t be fooled, he should have and could have put this trial in its correct jurisdiction. There was enough undamaged space to try it in its proper place and where OJ would have gotten a jury of HIS peers. He wanted his constituents to have the trial of the century in their patch. It was ALL ABOUT THE VOTES. Don’t be fooled.
BS
i THOUGHT IN THE END HE SAID IT WAS HIS CALL!!
@@pommiebears They move trials everyday to get white jurie;s.
@@pommiebears Blacks are not capable of being objective.???
Great interview
Great interview!
The jury liked OJ's lawyers better. And that matters in a circus atmosphere.
Both of you are right also OJ didn’t commit this crime. He was innocent.
@@Berkmugga You are high
Gil raised a successful son that went on to become a mayor.
Who successfully helped destroy Los Angeles
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb how
I still wondering why AC Cowlings never testified or why was he never subpoenaed? There's video of him at Nicole's memorial service bawling in tears so he def had a bond with Nicole.
That's a great question. I always wondered that myself. He was subpoenaed for the civil trial and provided testimony. But he only had actual information about the domestic violence, not the murders.
@@danieldougan269 Ron Shipp and Denise Brown had information about the domestic violence and they both testified. Cowlings was part of the Bronco chase, which was presented at the Civil trial and was probably more relevant. Funny how I never noticed that AC Cowlings wasn't called to testify about that.
The handling of the whole trial by the prosecution.......WAS PATHETIC!! ...PERIOD!!!!!
The prosecution did the best possible job that they could..Darden as a Co* prosecutor was an extremely poor choice..once he entered the team, they were put at a crucial/ substantial dis advantage, however, the jury actually did not not the prosecutions case..they immensely loved oj Simpson, everybody LOVED oj...it did appear like the juice may have been guilty, although, once Cochran and Scheck joined the team, they were taken to another level...great cohesiveness and team chemistry developed quickly.
@@daviddavis3389 I do think he did it but Mark Fuhrman's chicanery sat him free. Think about what he was thinking during the trial. When you know you did it, and a team of brilliant lawyers who some of them may believe you, masterfully defend you, you are gaslighted to believe in your own innocence!! That's a feeling no one felt except OJ. 🤷🏽♂️ That's why he babbles a lot.
Yes, but that jury wasn't going to convict him regardless of if they saw the crime on the video
Marcia was an “excellent lawyer” who didn’t bother to use the available evidence in the trial. Didn’t introduce the letters or the fact that he fled with a disguise. Didn’t mention Jill Shively reporting his license plate as he drove home erratically after the murders.
The chair looks very uncomfortable
It's to make the host look big and important.
@@jasonmichael3676 yup, this is one of the more egregious cases of “I’m the host” that I’ve seen.
@@andrewdunn49ers Yes, it's ridiculous.
Marcia Clark is a great lawyer????? Not during this case. She got worked. She appeared as though she was in way over her head.
aMEN!! i THOUGHT SHE WAS PATHETIC!!
Her and Darden got played by Johnny! They got their feelings involved and Johnny played with them
Marcia Clark was a Scientologist, her husband Gordon Clark was a high ranking Scientologist. OJ Simpson had been a Scientologist as was Greta Van Susterren(sp?) who was a part of the FAKE NEWS. By the way Charles Manson was a Scientologist.
@@Jim_Harwood what???...please take your meds
@@vitintres2451 Do a little research you lazy, dumb arsehole.
I agree exactly what he is taking about. The crimes and sentences are backwards
I love Gil's pet snake
those socks thooooo
Bahaha...GUILTY of Foookin Crazy Socks Bud!
Inbal Ida aren’t they hideous? And that....thing, around his shoulders is so........weird! Stripes everywhere! Lol.
@@pommiebears
Gilbert Salvador Iberri Garcetti (born August 5, 1941)
commonly favors donning stripes.
(See on-line images. 😊)
The prosecutors never produced the shoes and never produced a murder weapon. Its all innuendo
Its tough for them to produce them when OJ ditched them god knows where.
@@apebitmusic83 It shows how little you actually think. The prosecution said OJ committed the murders at 10:35 pm and we know from testimony he was back at his Rockingham home getting into a limo, with his luggage and he was clean as a whistle at 10:54 pm. Therefore if OJ was the killer he only had 19 minutes to get rid of the murder weapon, shoes, clean up, and get into the limo. It is impossible for LAPD not to have found the knife and the shoes with that small window of time afforded Simpson. IMPOSSIBLE And if you cant follow what I am showing you then you're too far gone.
And dont tell me he tossed the evidence away at the airport or Chicago as both lies were debunked years ago. But that's why Garcetti wont talk about the lack of murder weapon or shoes. He knew the case against Simpson was fake.
@@Jim_Harwood How little I think?. :eyeroll. You’ve got it all figured out. That’s why 99.9% of legal experts say that OJ got away with murder (not an exact stat but I’m sure it’s close). Shows you how illogically you think.
@@apebitmusic83 Yeah roll your eyes genius. You just insulted yourself when you admitted "experts" do your thinking for you. Besides those so called experts were witnesses to nothing. And the defense presented experts that totally destroyed the fake narrative and the 12 jurors debunked all media persons spreading fake news.. But it's so simple any non brainwashed person could figure it out that Simpson was innocent--there is no murder weapon or shoes? I told you before and it is in the record. Prosecutors said Simpson started his two person kill spree at 10:35 pm and we know he entered the limo to LAX at 10:54 pm. He had luggage was cleanly dressed and he was ready to go. If he were the killer then LAPD would have found the knife and shoes! You still wont get what I am saying. There is not sufficient time to keep these items safe and LAPD knows where he was at 10:54 pm while they claim he was at Bundy at 10:35 pm. So genius seeing they know where he was at both 10:35 and 10:54 then where could he hide the murder weapon. See how easy it was for LAPD to find the knife if Simpson were the killer and yet 27 years later still no knife! Yeah them experts they're real sharp, like Simpson's missing knife.
And you wanna know why the Prosecutors never introduced a murder weapon? Because then forensic test would prove there was two knives used in the murder--Oh,oh...pull the TV plug, Charles Manson and David Berkowitz are calling they have a new plan to keep the cover up in place !
Garcetti seems like he's the embodiment of the term "cool old dude."
Gil where is Andrea Scott.????
I’m not sure I believe that it wasn’t his choice to hold the case downtown vs Santa Monica. He was the DA of LA, he definitely had the power to move it if he was concerned about not getting a fair trial like it wound up being.
This case exposes the double standards in the Law = multi Millionaires are beyond the Law.
One rule for the rich, another for the poor.
I agree with Garcetti regarding the injustice of the Nevada sentence.
"our system is still the best" is such an american thing to say. It's not... by a mile.
He was trying to install confidence back into the community with that comment. However, there is a difference between "powerful" and "best". Just here in Australia we have a better criminal justice system, better health system, better welfare, more affordable higher education, less disparity between rich and poor, better minimum wage, I can go on. People don't work 3 jobs and still live below the poverty line in Australia. Then there's the guns...........
Australia is "owned" by the British Empire. You clowns aren't even called "citizens", you're called "subjects" as your subjects of the Queen, who is the sovereign. Go sell it somewhere else.
Jack Johnson Oh please, you really don't agree with him? Everything he said is true, our justice system convicts innocent people and let's the guilty go free based on their economic status, our minimum wage isn't enough for people to rent a crappy apartment, and our healthcare system costs too much for most people to even go to the doctor. And we obviously have a major gun violence issue. The truth hurts sometimes.
So Ellen, are Aussies known as "Subjects" (of the Crown) or are they known as "Citizens" of a republic? Save all the BS lady and cut to the chase.
Jack: So really what difference does that make? Who cares if they're "subjects" who have great health care, etc?
When Bob costas goes and visits him in jail his friend none the less and then says he knows he did it that speaks volumes
they all came to the realization that he did it . Did you see Al Cowlings around towards the end of his life ? did you see anyone that he had known befpre? At some point in time their access to him - he exposed in some way or another that he did it and he was just moving on like it never happened .
Wow that hit home when Gil Garcetti said that the sentence that O.J. got for the crime he committed in NV was over the top & not real justice if you look at it really look at it he's 100% right 33 years for what he did or was involved in was just outrageous I didn't feel sorry for him either but that was crazy...
5:47 is the part to watch. Jimmy Carter was a great President, but he is also a great human being. I sincerely love him, and I want everyone to know how good he is.
To say Jimmy Carter was a great President is just intellectually dishonest.
@@sareight , I disagree. He was better than any other President of the last 50 years. The American people didn't deserve him, truthfully, and they proved it.
@@BBBoggs That’s total nonsense. As a President he was one of the absolute worst we’ve ever had.
@@sareight , that's total nonsense! See, I can do it.
@@BBBoggs There isn’t anyone with common sense that thinks he was a good President. He is widely known as one of the worst. Not just my opinion but an opinion held by an overwhelming majority and historians. His list of failures was long.
Garcetti thought that since they had Grand Jury proceedings downtown he could not transfer the case to Santa Monica. He thought he was stuck downtown.
He is liberal pos and screwed this case because of Rodney king to save his re-election
Judge was your Boss,He also make the Decision to Tell You to Anounce it
There will never again be a case like this again. Bloody finger print and the gloves are a peace of History and burno molly shoes. We're enough to put oj away.
What is this goofball wearing? OJ knows how to handle a gold digger.
Why is his seat so low? I understand it’s this subliminal “I’m the host” thing but man this is borderline demeaning.
Amazing how intelligent people can look past obvious facts . We all know gloves don’t slip off easily , but why if one glove comes off at crime scene would the killer decide to take off the other glove at Simpson’s home . If it was Oj he could have thrown the glove anywhere, why drop it at his house ?
chris m - You've come to conclusions that aren't obvious at all. Just look at the facts. The left glove, measured in court, was 5/8ths of an inch shorter than the right. The shorter the glove the easier it would come off. Speculation/inference: the left glove came off in the struggle when Ron tried to free himself from OJS. No evidence was presented a glove was "thrown" anywhere. The matching right glove was found in the pathway behind OJS's house. Speculation/inference: OJS dropped the glove where it was eventurally found and wasn't aware he had lost it. When he realized he didn't have it he didn't know where he dropped it. The path behind his home is pitch black at night, no lights at all. If you know the facts presented about the gloves used during the murders, and have a good understanding of mathematical probability, you would know that the gloves found at Bundy and Rockingham are OJS's. There isn't one piece of evidence to support the glove being planted by Mark Fuhrman. The idea was ingenious, but its without proof, which doesn't seem to make a difference to a lot of people.
~
~
Also, if it was OJ, had his kids awoken you'd have to believe he'd be willing to 'Do Away' with them too. His own children. The whole story they've relentlessly pushed at this case has been.. 'everyone knows he's guilty', like if they say it enough times it'll stick. Not only was evidence twisted at the time, but after they lost the case, they've made up all kinds of excuses that they tag on. Thinking those who've not seen the trial in it's entirety will be none the wiser.
@@NeverGiddy bro my issue is you know you have corrupt officers all over the case and with evidence also all over the crime scene and expect people to trust the evidence
@@alind1611 - I am presuming you are very familiar with this trial. Please list all of the "corrupt officers" who were involved in this case that have made you doubt the integrity of the evidence.
@@alind1611 go and watch OJThe Lost Confession and see him admit to doing it
Garcetti lied, in Marcia's book, she said the chase wasn't put in because she felt the jury would have had sympathy for him
I always thought Gil Garcetti was Italian instead he is Latin
Yes; very interesting.
"Garcetti was born in Los Angeles, the son of Salvador Garcetti, and Juanita Iberri.
His father was born in Parral, Chihuahua, Mexico, and brought to the United States as a child after his own father, Massimo Garcetti, (a judge, and immigrant) to Mexico from Italy, was hanged during the Mexican Revolution.
Gil's mother was born in Arizona, one of nineteen children born to a father whose parents were from Sonora, Mexico, and a mother born in Arizona, to Mexican parents."
Gilbert Salvador Iberri Garcetti (born August 5, 1941)
Same amount as cops get away
Open case? It’s over, he was acquitted
He was referring to the admittedly preposterous idea that the murderer is still at large.
It's plain & simple he got away with murder & there's nothing anyone can say or do to change that O.J. took it to his grave...
Garcetti's office and its incompetence lost a very winnable case by deciding to leave out several very key pieces of evidence because they were afraid the LAPD would be scrutinized too much by the jury, and they were erroneously over confident that they had plenty for a conviction with the blood evidence alone. The murderer got off due to the utter incompetence of the prosecution and its "leadership". He's lying through his teeth about "not remembering the specifics" about what they decided to bring to trial. They, as in HIS office, decided to not introduce the slow speed chase and the conversation between him and Lange DURING the chase which was recorded, and also the interview Lange and Vannatter had with Simpson the day after the murders where he changes his story three times during the fifty five minute interview about how he cut his finger. Don't let him BS you. This is ALL documented.
They had the blood. They had the domestic violence history. They even showed a video of him working out and making a joke about beating his wife. They had Allan Park’s testimony. They had Kato’s testimony. He had no alibi from 9:30pm until 11pm ish. Ron Shipp testified that OJ told him that he had dreams of killing Nicole. What the heck more do you need? People have been put to death for 10 percent of that. They had more than enough evidence
It’s just that the defense created that reasonable doubt with Mark Fuhrman and the criminalist mishandling the evidence. The defense did everything in their natural power to make sure he was acquitted and they achieved it. Even if it meant playing the “race card”.
The case was never winnable. LA police and prosecutors misdeeds came back to haunt them.
O no they take..
Garcetti must continuously make terrible choices. Putting Clark and Darden on the Simpson case and those orange striped socks for example
I've often wondered, why didn't Garcetti himself prosecute OJ?
That’s what got Simpson acquitted, the failure of the lapd and the prosecution to realize how big the case was, instead the cops/detectives were torn apart and the prosecution looked like first year law students
He’s not very bright. It would have been a disaster.
That is why he hired Marcia Clark she is a terrible prosecutor
@@danielupsdell2697 If Mark Fuhrman wasn't a damn racist they would have won the case.Racism is what's killing this country.
DA is a political job - it is not about prosecuting people - imagine overseeing 1100 lawyers ? no way someone could do that and prosecute a high profile case .
It took the jury 35 minutes to find OJ innocent because all the so-called evidence have been debunked. At the end, there was zero evidence against OJ. The frame job had failed. So Plan B was just try to say the defense use a race card and that’s why they won.
He laughed at the thought of looking at others.
Gil's best point is at 18 minutes
It clearly seems OJ committed the double homicides given the facts his blood sample being on the crime scene, the written suicidal letter, the low-speed chase and so on.
However the mishandling of the evidence, the lies of Furhman and Vennatter, the unfitting gloves have put in the mind of everyone a “reasonable doubt”
As the prosecution had the burden of proof and therefore was meant to prove its allegations beyond a reasonable doubt which it failed OJ got away with it. Though to my point of view the race of the jurors has played a non important role of the decision cause up till now the REASONABLE DOUBT prevails.
Oh Orenthal
Gil, did you 5 year old dress you for this?
They asked 1 of the jurors why did it only take yall 4 hours to come up with a verdict! the Juror asks the interviews "how many days were we sequestered? the interviewer says 267 days ...the juror then says She (we) has 266 days to think about the case !" this is what we did and had to do every single night for nearly 9 mos! no TV no contact with any family members no phones calls no nothing! for 9 mos f your job! f your kids f your loved ones! just this case all day n all night for 9 mons so idk why Gil thought they was gonna all of a sudden sit around n rehash for another week or so again!
The juice was loose ‼️‼️
As always Rich does not have a clue .. as green as can be
Omg, if he grew up near USC and if he stayed close to that community he had to know how deep our distrust of the police. LAPD is so racist---they could be from Mississippi.
He is white
Fuk the police long live OJ black mans victory in a white mans world!
@@msbrando the garcetti’s are of mexican descent. Their ancestors were chased out of Mexico during the mexican revolution
@@rpgman6464 very poetic in short words, I imagine OJ in tattered clothes screaming at the day in victory, it’s kind of vivid and twisted
@@damianrodriguez5907 that's a rumor.
He prob threw the knife at the airport with other evidence items
Vumilia A man came forward saying that h saw OJ toss stuff in the garbage but not sure 🤔 it was at the airport. I don’t how that man can live with himself knowing he took his children’s mom away from them in such a brutal way!!🤢🤮😢😡
margarita ochoa he blacked out and can’t remember. He thinks it was someone else. If you listen to his confession he blames it one someone with him named Charle. Several people have said OJ talks as a third person all the time. In the meal line he’d say “OJ is going to have a double portion of meatloaf today”. He’s a real nut job. He thinks he didn’t do it.
@@classicsurvivor It was his son Jason who killed Ronald Goldman and Nicole Simpson.
Carolina Gonzalez S. Don’t be an idiot.
@@margoochoa9761 The prosecution didn't think is was necessary to put him on the stand.
His comment on the knife being discovered 20 years later. "We did an exhaustive search. It made no impact on me". Well, apparently your guys missed a knife Gil. What else did they miss?
Jason Simpson, that's who they missed.
Not one shred of physical evidence points that way. OJ would turn in his own mother to get his old life back.
Okay, good detective work!
@@raygordon3728 how would they have any evidence linking Jason to the murders when all they cared about was evidence to link OJ to the murders.
Why did Jason forge his time card at work the night of the murders?
But they did deliberate....for about 90 minutes, then got lunch, then pretended to deliberate for a few more hours....then called it a day.
That is exactly what they did
I believe the only thing they reviewed was Allan Park’s testimony (some of it). And that, to me, is the closest thing they had to a witness and I believe every word he said. But for the jury, it wasn’t enough to convict.
@@itsharryhagenthey also had dna but ignored it
@@Andrea-ue7gv Well 1, DNA was relatively new in court cases in 1995 and 2, Barry Scheck exposed the criminalists for their poor handling of the evidence and raised enough doubt for there to be cross contamination.
Barry Scheck destroyed Dennis Fung on the stand. Barry showed actual video footage of Dennis not wearing gloves during collection of evidence. Which Dennis admitted was wrong
15 is this still an open case
Lol Chris Darden and Marcia Clark were a$$
This great case had "two gloves, stocking hat, blood samples, and some shoe prints".
That's all folks!!!!
Did not fit,not enough proof,samples were contaminated and shoe prints was not from a bow legged person like oj
@@matthewwilliams3643 WET LEATHER GLOVES SHRINK!!!!
Host feels insecure about something coz he’s made sure he’s elevated above his guests.
That's what I bin saying all these years the làwyers rush to go to triàl the prosecution
Have him explain the EDTA in Simpson's blood? ... I'll wait. 🤔
EXACTLY!!
Other factors to look into . And the lapd won’t coz they have egg on their face. But other factors would be what blood type is jason Simpson? Type B , as found under Nicole Brown Simpson nails which didn’t match oj or Ron Goldman, did what’s his name, the guy with blonde hair and beard that was mentioned of maybe killing them , he was a painter and did he work on Simpson’s house when Nicole redecorated it , we will never know.
What's he wearing?
BH isn’t it awful? If my husband wore what he’s wearing.....I’d burst out laughing! Lol!
Something fruity.
number 4 its obvious that he is not the killer. get ready for martin sheen's documentary early 2017.
I get it if you want to say in a 'Legal sense" he was found "not guilty" by a jury of our peers but that martin sheen documentary claiming o.j.`s son killed ron and nicole is a farce! We need to stop living in a make believe world and start dealing with reality. There is no aboninable snowman or bigfoot either. Geeze!
@@winycityfightfan Jason Simpson fits the profile of the murderer: he's a chef with knife skills, military past and rage issues. He had previously attacked other people with knife: his boss and two girlfriends.
@@carolinagonzalezs. haha you think the murdered needed “knife skills” that a chef would have, huh? I can’t. Haha
@@winycityfightfan no one ever touched the moon, witches, aliens, yetis, don't exist, don't think atom's been split [scienfically impossible], a i d s not an std, nor is h i v, lots of massive lies from our TV machine ay? 100 years of absolute propaganda! to keep our tax dollars rollin in :(
@@carolinagonzalezs. But zero evidence of that. Conspiracy nonsense.
That caller was right theres no way Oj could’ve committed those murder physically with a scratch on him whoever did it had some marks on them because Ron Goldman fought back
Did they check OJ's deposit box
Eisn is so out of touch with reality, white tunnel vision
is gil making a fashion statement
Carter
1,100 lawyers in his office
The Los Angeles County District Attorney does not prosecute a case
Who, from 13 June 1994 to 3 October 1995, was Gil Garcetti
Currently George Gascón
“The office employs roughly 1,000 deputy district attorneys, nearly 300 investigators and about 800 support personnel, comprising the largest local prosecutorial agency in the nation.”
Tried in Los Angeles County Superior Court
Dude says “white” like Stewy says “Cool Whip”.
Let's not forget he was found guilty in civil court
Yes and he has not paid all the money to the Goldmans.
this gill garcetti, whats with this guy anyway, orange socks? what the F!
David Lamotta ...THOSE SOCKS! J I can't look at anything else... I can't concentrate on anything else
Of all the subjects this video covers, you're worried about the socks? I hope you never see how I dress!
Lol and that looks like a snake around his neck :)
What’s up with his fake snake
Damn, he’s aged.
Your getting away with that tye and socks combo
He’s a professional photographer now, he’s allowed to dress weird imo... what I have an issue with is that set, those chairs and that desk just look so awkward and uninviting 🤣😂whoever decorated in there should be fired
Nice socks Gil
Ray Lewis killed two people too
Robert Blake
wearing a tutu
Sorry Gil, you and the OJ prosecutors did a disservice to the detective's working with you. You knew the Furhman tapes were taken out of context and you did nothing to stop it from being blown out of proportion by the defense and ruining their careers. Now, you are blithering on a talk show. Is there no end to how far you will stoop.
Agreed Furhman was reading a script which could easily be proven.they could have brought up cases of African Americans who were murdered that he solved. The entire prosecution were idiots.
Arty Fire only a racist would say Furhman not a racist...It's on tape just like the Rodney King beating...
I can listen to a man that's fair... I think this ex DA. Gave some truth. At the End Justice Got back at OJ... In people wonder why minorities don't trust them or the institution...
@@wyzmann32 stop supporting that racist Furman! He wants to genocide all POC.s
@@wyzmann32 You Must be nuts. I do think OJ did it but Mark Fuhrman's chicanery sat him free. Think about what he was thinking during the trial. When you know you did it, and a team of brilliant lawyers who some of them may believe you, masterfully defend you, you are gaslighted to believe in your own innocence!! That's a feeling no one felt except OJ. 🤷🏽♂️ That's why he babbles a lot.
The Garcetti's have Mexican blood lineage.. research it
What is he WEARING
Garcetti family knows how to destroy Los Angeles.
I agree with Gil in terms of some athletes thinking that they can get away with things and get a pass.
O.J.: Made in America
The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story
garcetti term in 2000
Status Quo is so disingenuous! PERIOD; END OF DISCUSSION!
Most people don't know that the Gacetti's are Mexican
What's your hang up with Mexican people!!! You are starting to sound like a bonafide Racist...this is at least the 2nd time that you've brought up Mr Garceti's ethnicity.
he's italian actually
@@joeorlando9140 "His paternal grandmother, Juanita Iberri, was born in Arizona, one of 19 children born to an immigrant father from Sonora, Mexico, and an Arizona-born mother whose father and mother were both Mexican. Garcetti's maternal grandparents were Russian Jewish immigrants."
OJ has bow legs, the shoe prints didn’t match someone with bow legs.
Lol
W
lol
why is he dressed like a cult leader lmao
Why does it matter the skin colour of a jury wtf has this world come to I though justice was blind
Ummm...you must be living in fantasy land if you feel race doesn't matter in the justice system
if he wasn't a multi millionaire he would be rotting in a toilet cubicle, justice is a greedy old git
@@michaeln7443 not race, it's just skin tone, ethnicity, all humans are one race, homo sapiens, our DNA matches, we all come from African Women, according to science, hate is Divide & Conquer tactics employed by the 5000 super rich families who control earth
he moved the OJ trial from a jury of his affluent peers to downtown LA. Game Over (GO!JUICE)
He JUST SAID the judge moved it.
What the hell is Gil wearing? Witchipoo socks and a weird scarf? And his head seems way too big for his body.
Don't care that you grew up in a house. Don't care if you grew up in a racially mixed environment. The fact is that you lost the biggest murder trial that you will ever come across. Take a seat.
Why didn't you guys take him like a poor him like he didn't have money or fame.