I still can’t decide between the 2020 version and the 2007 version 2020: AMAZING design 2007: WHAT ON EARTH IS COOLER THAN A LEGO AT-AT WALKING ON ITS OWN?!?!?!?!
I'm just really annoyed that none of the AT-ATs after 2007 have printed pieces on the joints of the legs, they look so good and it's such a missed opportunity.
Searched and found this, I was wondering how the troops got off the AT-AT: "The funny part about this is that Lucasfilm had no clue what the answer to this was. They just put them in ESB and thought they were cool, without really thinking about the practicality. However, while preparing the toy lineup, Kenner called them up. Uh, guys? We're trying to design the new AT-AT toy, and we're not sure how the people get on and off. How's it supposed to work? Lucasfilm didn't have an answer. So, the older books like the Star Wars Source Book or the Star Wars Technical Journal will tell you that they got down onto their knees, lowered ramps, and had troops run down the ramps from the body. However, when the Incredible Cross Sections book came out, the authors derived a different theory. They suggested that rather than have the AT-AT kneel, they instead projected large booms from the body, and have troops rappel down zip lines to the ground. It's therefore possible that both are correct, and AT-ATs can do either one, but it's not really clear. The technical drawings of Cross Sections, Technical Journal, and Essential Guide all differ in their descriptions of AT-ATs. In other words, the authors just made them up. But usually, the way that canon gets around that is to say that there were many different varieties of AT-AT walkers. In fact, the old Source Book says that some AT-ATs could be configured to carry AT-ST walkers inside them! So it's definitely likely that they had different configurations." -David Eaton, on Quora
In Return of the Jedi, when Luke surrenders himself to Vader on Endor, you can clearly see an AT-AT standing next to a raised platform with an extended walkway connecting it.
That's probably how they boarded, but getting off would be a different story. It's really cool to imagine an AT-AT getting on its knees for troops to leave, but ziplines are cool too. Let's hope we see one of these happening in a film or show.
@@coconut8192 they also show in the games such as battlefront and jedi fallen order you enter from the body side doors then walk in through the neck into the head to pilot it
The UCS AT-AT release has brought me back here and has confirmed what I have always thought. Apart from the original 4483 the other Walkers have way to skinny legs and this is a big deal in the overall look of the complete AT-AT.
Personally, when he turned it on and I saw it actually moving, I thought the motorized AT-AT looked like shit as well. Maybe it isn't true, but it looked like a strong breeze could have knocked it over.
I have a theory for the “squinting” view port slit on the new one. For one of the close up shots of the head in empire strikes back, they use a model with a noticeably thinner view port. I’m guessing they used that shot as reference when designing it.
Proud member of the 2% 2003 vote. I idolized that set too as a child and when I finally got it a couple years ago it didn’t disappoint at all. I don’t see outdated building techniques as a flaw if the set had its heart in the right place, and no one is gonna tell me the 2003 at at didn’t give its all for us Star Wars LEGO fans back in the day.
I'm proud to be the owner of the 2003. Very last set I've ever built before I became a high school student and moved on to other interests. One of my absolute favorite sets.
I think most of the channel voters are a much younger crowd so they tend to favor the newer sets in general. Yes, some of my love for these older sets is nostalgia, but the 2003 AT-AT is one of the best of these old Lego Star Wars sets and really holds up, even to modern sets.
I really still love the 2003 version. It's a little fragile as a play set, but I enjoy having it on display on a shelf. Plus the legs actually look thick enough
@@ctuk-202 not at all. The body shape is perfect, the legs are spot on etc. It's definatly is better than the former two versions, only the 2020 might be better for some
I was really confused as to why my AT-AT didn't look like any of these. Then I remembered that I got it for a discount but it was missing the box and one of the bags. So mine is apparently a VERY heavily modified 2014 one.
From 2018 onwards I've noticed Lego has become super dedicated to their new meta of focusing on accurate appearing kits and I think that has a lot to do with their shift in target audience with changes to their marketing. Now days they have fully embraced the older generation of Lego collectors who care more about accuracy and display model quality kits than kids do when it comes to their expensive show piece model kits with focusing on marketing their different ranges at specific target audiences within their customer base. And this also was forced on them with shifting customer trends. Lego seems to only really have two age group audiences now; Adults and Kids, that's it. As most teens are more interested in video games and sports currently.
I remember owning the 2014 one and when I was holding it at 7 years old, I had so much trouble building it and in the end I decided to just tear it apart and now looking back at it, I really regret it and I hope to get one to have as part of my collection
I think the 2003 AT-AT had the best design from all of these models. He looks by far more like the "real" AT-AT than the others and the old grey just goes better with any set. But since this is my opinion based on the Lego Sets I had as child, im clearly biased there.
William Blazo thank you, you are such a great person i truely had no idea what he was talking about! I’m sure you have lots a friends with how nice and generous you are!
i like how the 2003 atat is really tall, and the dark grey goes well with the set. also its cool that 3 2000s sets had the same speeder bike build in different colors
I remember 2014 Christmas and the 2014 AT-AT was probably the best gift I've ever gotten on Christmas. Sadly, as the kid that I was, I absolutely destroyed this set into pieces, but I'm currently trying to rebuild it!!! Great video!
I got the 2007 one for Christmas in 2007 and it was probably the best gift I have ever received. So many memories building and playing with it with my dad. it also had that handle on top for easy mobility. its fallen apart a bit since then but the skeletal technic remains still stand in my closet.
I still love the 2014, because to me it just looks the most pleasing to have on display. New ones just doesn’t have they look that the 2014 gives. I also remember that I bought the 2014 on like the last day it was going to be in stores. Since it was going to be discontinued. I had the option of the at-at which I bought or the other discontinued star destroyer.
Man, I love your comparisons, they are really thorough :) 2014 AT-AT was very good, 2020 version seems perfect. I'm surprised the first one (2003) still looks pretty well, considering how bad first LEGO Star Wars sets were designed...
The 2020 version looks amazing.. good use of space, accurate design and makes for an awesome display piece, but man.. seeing the 2007 walk is a thing of beauty! Great review, and I think ultimately the ranking in the end is correct
The first AT-AT has a genuinely impressive build and I feel like the following years were a pretty big let down. I mean they were better in a technical sense but they were kinda missing the allure of the first one. I mean that was up until 2020 which is such a huge improvement over every other build, they really utilized as much space as possible and the body looks so much better. It's the improvement upon 2014 is truly remarkable
I have 2003 version of the at at. And I personally love it. It's big and looks super cool. Also the speeder inside of it is super cool as well. It's a classic among Lego sets.
@Noah Maldonado I love my 2014 version too! It looks awesome on my shelf :D The 2020 one would probably look even nicer, which is why it’s such a hard decision 😂
for anyone wondering “this monstrosity” is called “dark side developer (9754)” and sadly could only walk forward and backward but it was motorized and essentially released as an early design to a walking lego at-at.
Look closely at the 2014 snow troopers one of them is the snow trooper commander from the UCS ATAT that means that the snow trooper commander is not only in the UCS ATAT
I am a HUGE AT-AT fan. I love this vehicles so much. The 2020 version brings so much justice to this iconic vehicle that I thought previous iterations were missing. I can’t wait to get my hands on it.
ok boomer Ultimate collectors series. It’s a expensive series of sets known to be for adults, they don’t have play features, and are usually 100$+. Look up UCS LEGO models, they’re awesome
Love the comparison video Ryan! One suggestion - your new ratings system allots quite a few points to opinion relative to the other categories. Maybe you could average the opinion scores of the fans and yourself for the future comparison videos to fix that. Keep up the great work! Can we see a Jedi Interceptor comparison next?
I have the 2003 AT-AT, and I've ended up messing with the neck connection to keep it on. While I still love it, I eagerly await the 2020's release- maybe even going so far as to pick up a few of em ;D
Some details are just best on 4483: the legs are properly tugged in underneath the body, whereas on the 2020 version the top joint panels stick out slightly. The side guns on the 2020 version are also situated very far out from the side panels, and sit oddly low. Just a few observations from someone who loves the authentic look of the original filming models
10:03 Referring to the head and neck joint..."Kids could probably break this easy" We did. That head fell off so many times I considered gluing it when I owned the set.
I can honestly see why. A while back, me and my dad built our own custom AT-AT because we didn't have an official one. It was actually around the size of a UCS AT-AT. Around two minutes after we completed it, it fell apart. It didn't have sufficient support due to other factors. Unfortunately, that's a problem I can't see TLG overcoming currently, they've said so themselves.
giving the fact that you have all of the at-at's i am going to rate them like this 1. disappointed by lack of playability and space, the fact that only one at-at driver fits, very inaccurate but I love the color-pattern used by lego. 2. disappointed by the lack of playability that comes with lack of space (2 in 1). Good figures but the fact that it walks by his own is just absolutely mindblowing. 3. disappointed in every way. 4. i like it a lot, lots of space,good figures,good props(blaster,speederbike) and i love the playability. Very cool set over all 5. maybe the best out of all of them, the most accurate, maybe slightly better then 2007 but not by a lot.
I realized that when Ryan was going through the figures, the 2014 SnowTrooper with White Glove and Waist piece is actually A Commander, so The UCS At At isn’t the only At At with a SnowTrooper commander. (You can tell by the torso Printing)
Walmart has the AT-AT on clearance for $100. So glad I picked it up. Always wanted an AT-AT as a kid but the sets were always too expensive for me. Wanted to see how the others stacked up against it. 2007 looks pretty cool as well. There's something about that original that I love too. Probably just the nostalgia.
Just bought the 2020 walker I’ve been working way too much to relax and finish it but I’m pretty satisfied with my purchase. Also I love the fact you include inflation adjustments I just appreciate that a lot
About that strange decal color for 2010 version: I have the European release of this set and it has a clear back for the face sticker. Apparently LEGO provided some of those AT-ATs with white-backed sticker sheets by accident. The box art suggests that opaque sticker was an initial design, but eventually they never made them in grey. Transparent sticker looks better, but it's still a bit fuzzy because of the piece's texture.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Which AT-AT is the best? (Rip polls)
"This Monstrosity" Is!
2020 is the best
The motorized AT-AT is the best. I used to own one, and had fun playing with it as a kid.
2020 is by far the best!
2020
I still can’t decide between the 2020 version and the 2007 version
2020: AMAZING design
2007: WHAT ON EARTH IS COOLER THAN A LEGO AT-AT WALKING ON ITS OWN?!?!?!?!
I'm just really annoyed that none of the AT-ATs after 2007 have printed pieces on the joints of the legs, they look so good and it's such a missed opportunity.
An interior
The winner still 2007
If you could implement the functions of the 2007 one into the 2020 then that... would be my favourite
Get both and motorized the 2020 version lol
I like the 2020 version because it doesn't waste any space.
I like the 2020 version because it doesn’t waste my money
Sean Baker-Jervis that would be fantastic
@Sean Baker-Jervis that would be great... if they do that I will totally get it lol
exactly. if a set doesn't make the most of its interior I won't buy it
Yeah but it needs more snow troppers
11:01 “Mom you’re embarrassing me in front of the other AT-ATs!”
Underated comment
🤣😂😂🤣
Lol
Avengers reference
@@armit7586 Bruh
The 2003 one surprisingly up really well! However, the 2020 one's design and the 2007 one's function is just incredible.
The 2003 version holds up incredibly well considering how old of a set it is
Searched and found this, I was wondering how the troops got off the AT-AT:
"The funny part about this is that Lucasfilm had no clue what the answer to this was. They just put them in ESB and thought they were cool, without really thinking about the practicality.
However, while preparing the toy lineup, Kenner called them up. Uh, guys? We're trying to design the new AT-AT toy, and we're not sure how the people get on and off. How's it supposed to work? Lucasfilm didn't have an answer.
So, the older books like the Star Wars Source Book or the Star Wars Technical Journal will tell you that they got down onto their knees, lowered ramps, and had troops run down the ramps from the body.
However, when the Incredible Cross Sections book came out, the authors derived a different theory. They suggested that rather than have the AT-AT kneel, they instead projected large booms from the body, and have troops rappel down zip lines to the ground.
It's therefore possible that both are correct, and AT-ATs can do either one, but it's not really clear. The technical drawings of Cross Sections, Technical Journal, and Essential Guide all differ in their descriptions of AT-ATs. In other words, the authors just made them up. But usually, the way that canon gets around that is to say that there were many different varieties of AT-AT walkers. In fact, the old Source Book says that some AT-ATs could be configured to carry AT-ST walkers inside them! So it's definitely likely that they had different configurations."
-David Eaton, on Quora
In Return of the Jedi, when Luke surrenders himself to Vader on Endor, you can clearly see an AT-AT standing next to a raised platform with an extended walkway connecting it.
Coconut 81 wwhat, didn't notice, cool fact thx
That's probably how they boarded, but getting off would be a different story. It's really cool to imagine an AT-AT getting on its knees for troops to leave, but ziplines are cool too. Let's hope we see one of these happening in a film or show.
@@coconut8192 they also show in the games such as battlefront and jedi fallen order you enter from the body side doors then walk in through the neck into the head to pilot it
Stefan Sauvageon / What-a-Twist very long
Been waiting for ages to see this comparison
been*
Bin? You okay?
Bin? You good bro?
Gryyyphon I don’t know why but when I type something it types something else
Are you sure about that
Can't wait until 2070 when you'll be comparing 37 AT-ATs. 😂
It will be like a 3 hour video lol
Well uh, yes joke
But can I just say, this guy may be dead by 2070, but yes in the joke
In 2070 we will compare real at-at with lego
we will compare with global warming when we are all dead
The UCS AT-AT release has brought me back here and has confirmed what I have always thought. Apart from the original 4483 the other Walkers have way to skinny legs and this is a big deal in the overall look of the complete AT-AT.
Actually the legs are too thicc on that one, the legs are supposed to be thin
is nobody gonna talk about how the legs are too skinny on all but the oldest one....?
Hello
idk that’s true
Fr
but the newest one, the legs are too thick, aren't they?
Hi
The shoulder and neck area on the motorized AT-AT is rough. Moving legs seemed to come at a severe cost to looks.
Well, its 2007 tech
@@ai00436 lego be like: I am limited by the technology of my time
Function over looks
@@zachduperron8543 Try explaining that to a legit collector
Personally, when he turned it on and I saw it actually moving, I thought the motorized AT-AT looked like shit as well. Maybe it isn't true, but it looked like a strong breeze could have knocked it over.
I have a theory for the “squinting” view port slit on the new one. For one of the close up shots of the head in empire strikes back, they use a model with a noticeably thinner view port. I’m guessing they used that shot as reference when designing it.
I will not like because it has 66 likes
@@famousbowl9926 dude, nobody cares
@@APerson5569. imagine getting scared of numbers lol
@@Smol_Schan he making an order 66 joke
@@Smol_Schan you must not truly love Star Wars if you think it’s because he’s “scared of a number” lmfaooo r/whoooosh
Proud member of the 2% 2003 vote. I idolized that set too as a child and when I finally got it a couple years ago it didn’t disappoint at all. I don’t see outdated building techniques as a flaw if the set had its heart in the right place, and no one is gonna tell me the 2003 at at didn’t give its all for us Star Wars LEGO fans back in the day.
03' have alot of flaws (fragile head and underskirt) but i wouldnt trade my PITA 2003 set for nothing else
SnitchMoJo what do you mean PITA?
I must say there's something beautiful and pure about early 2000s Lego Star wars
@@foberdud7576 PITA = pain in the ass
SnitchMoJo ah gotcha, should’ve known that lol.
I agree tho, that thing is the OG AT AT and every other AT AT looks up to that one imo.
I'm proud to be the owner of the 2003. Very last set I've ever built before I became a high school student and moved on to other interests. One of my absolute favorite sets.
I think most of the channel voters are a much younger crowd so they tend to favor the newer sets in general.
Yes, some of my love for these older sets is nostalgia, but the 2003 AT-AT is one of the best of these old Lego Star Wars sets and really holds up, even to modern sets.
I own the 2003 version, I got it as a birthday present when I was younger and still own it years later
The builds are drastically different, but the figures imo even more so.
I really still love the 2003 version. It's a little fragile as a play set, but I enjoy having it on display on a shelf. Plus the legs actually look thick enough
True. 2003 is still unchallanged. I go as far to call it the most accurate
@@fuckinantipope5511 it definitely isn't the most accurate if anything it's probably the least accurate.
@@ctuk-202 not at all. The body shape is perfect, the legs are spot on etc. It's definatly is better than the former two versions, only the 2020 might be better for some
The legs are actually too thick for that one lol. The legs in the movie are much skinnier.
@@ctuk-202 Are you blind? Look at the 2007 one.
I was really confused as to why my AT-AT didn't look like any of these. Then I remembered that I got it for a discount but it was missing the box and one of the bags. So mine is apparently a VERY heavily modified 2014 one.
The 2007 one gets too much hate. I have it and it is literally one of the best sets ive ever owned. I MEAN COME ON! IT WALKS!!!!
I’m thinking of getting an expensive Lego set. Should I get the 2007 ATAT or the 2020 one or the millennium Falcon or the imperial star destroyer ?
@@Gamezar69 what about the 2021 AT AT coming out this year for $800
The 2020 one is better scaled and has a better interior
2003 one looks more menacing
Kenner is the UCS At-At we all dream of.
Ryan: Newest, Latest, and Greatest!
Me: Wow Ryan, SpOiLeRs
Yup no reason to watch the rest I guess.
Ok...
What’s the joke?
Abomination The Guy, he spoiled that the 2020 At-At is the best at the start
I love Ryan but all of his comparisons are basically “the newest model is the best design but the oldest one is the best value”
Capital ship comparison: 2006 ISD, 2009 Venator SD, 2014 ISD, 2017 FO SD.
I think he already did that
From 2018 onwards I've noticed Lego has become super dedicated to their new meta of focusing on accurate appearing kits and I think that has a lot to do with their shift in target audience with changes to their marketing. Now days they have fully embraced the older generation of Lego collectors who care more about accuracy and display model quality kits than kids do when it comes to their expensive show piece model kits with focusing on marketing their different ranges at specific target audiences within their customer base. And this also was forced on them with shifting customer trends. Lego seems to only really have two age group audiences now; Adults and Kids, that's it. As most teens are more interested in video games and sports currently.
I remember owning the 2014 one and when I was holding it at 7 years old, I had so much trouble building it and in the end I decided to just tear it apart and now looking back at it, I really regret it and I hope to get one to have as part of my collection
I love how the side cannons were made of a wrench pick-axe and spades.
@@opo6206 2014
@@opo6206 watch the video to find out
The 2003 one still holds up imo
I think the new one is totally the best, but that doesn’t mean I can afford it...
Same
ikr same lol
@@atleyrichardson I say 135 would be better but that's my opinion
Same
JaWa, just steal a broken ones parts
I think the 2003 AT-AT had the best design from all of these models. He looks by far more like the "real" AT-AT than the others and the old grey just goes better with any set. But since this is my opinion based on the Lego Sets I had as child, im clearly biased there.
2020 has the best design, 2007 can literally walk, this is a hard choice
Honestly i like the 2003 one the most. For the time it was very well done
The 2020 version looks fantastic I can’t wait to get it
Has anyone else noticed that the port has a brick separator in its mouth in the background?
Porg* and yes
It do be smokin dat weed
William Blazo thank you, you are such a great person i truely had no idea what he was talking about! I’m sure you have lots a friends with how nice and generous you are!
brother moment You might be being sarcastic but thank you
Yea
I really love the contrast of dark grey and light grey on the 2003 version.
Legend has it, General Veer’s identical brother joined the rebellion and fought each other on Hoth.
i like how the 2003 atat is really tall, and the dark grey goes well with the set. also its cool that 3 2000s sets had the same speeder bike build in different colors
When you’re so early seven different people are saying first
7, haha. HAHAHHAHA! 7? There are at least 50!
First
First
34,913th
@@kasperbuyens3562 agree
Hopefully you can remake this video in 2-3 years with the UCS at-at
Woody Collins probably becuase they would always come first, except for UCS hoth
James Hall what is UCS?
ok boomer ultimate collectors series
James Hall ohh okay thanks
I remember 2014 Christmas and the 2014 AT-AT was probably the best gift I've ever gotten on Christmas. Sadly, as the kid that I was, I absolutely destroyed this set into pieces, but I'm currently trying to rebuild it!!! Great video!
😭😭😭 My Cat Knocked mine Over and it’s In a million Pieces
that moment when you realize a lego set has been on earth longer than you've been alive
0:22 I forgot about that boyo, I feel like he should be included (even if it gets last place in every category).
Isn’t this series just him flexing that he has all the Lego sets that he’s comparing
Yeah probably
Pretty much
Isn't this basically him burning the ego set.
No no. He’s got a point
The 2010 and 2014 versions weren't long enough. I'm glad the 2020 version fixed that.
I got the 2007 one for Christmas in 2007 and it was probably the best gift I have ever received. So many memories building and playing with it with my dad. it also had that handle on top for easy mobility. its fallen apart a bit since then but the skeletal technic remains still stand in my closet.
I still love the 2014, because to me it just looks the most pleasing to have on display. New ones just doesn’t have they look that the 2014 gives. I also remember that I bought the 2014 on like the last day it was going to be in stores. Since it was going to be discontinued. I had the option of the at-at which I bought or the other discontinued star destroyer.
Was looking for this comment
The notes at the bottom when he was looking at the boxes were hilarious😂😂
1:24 ahh yes “Auctually”
The Mindstorm is a monstrosity because it actually walked.. which is what made it badass
You have no idea how long I’ve waited for this
Man, I love your comparisons, they are really thorough :)
2014 AT-AT was very good, 2020 version seems perfect. I'm surprised the first one (2003) still looks pretty well, considering how bad first LEGO Star Wars sets were designed...
The 2020 version looks amazing.. good use of space, accurate design and makes for an awesome display piece, but man.. seeing the 2007 walk is a thing of beauty!
Great review, and I think ultimately the ranking in the end is correct
All of the AT-ATs just standing there reminds me of the boys
What happened to them
@@APerson5569. no remember the meme of the boys? If you don’t look it up
Friend: Comes to my house *sees AT-AT* “That thing looks stupid!”
Me: *turns it on*
Friend: “Forgive me for my blasphemy...”
Ha
Damn the older Lego sets built with that gray really feel old. Like they're from a black n white movie
Motorised version is brilliant. Even the Design while not being as accurate is still nice Great video👍
You’re like my favourite Star Wars reviewer, you have inspired me to create my own lego channel. I would love some support and feedback
The first AT-AT has a genuinely impressive build and I feel like the following years were a pretty big let down. I mean they were better in a technical sense but they were kinda missing the allure of the first one. I mean that was up until 2020 which is such a huge improvement over every other build, they really utilized as much space as possible and the body looks so much better. It's the improvement upon 2014 is truly remarkable
you know a Lego Star Wars set is amazing when they use shots form the underside of the build in the front of the box!
The choice between 2007 and 2020 is really tight for me. 2020 looks better but how can you not love an AT-AT that can walk on its own?
Me: Can I go to Bobby’s house to play with his atat?
Mom: no we have atat at home
Atat at home: 0:22
11:15 that at-at be doing the moon walk you know
Me: has two dogs
Ryan: has 5 dogs- i mean AT-ATs
Imagine having 5 ATATs... if only...
Meh. Just buy two TX-130 Republic Fighter Tanks and outmaneuver them.
I have 2003 version of the at at. And I personally love it. It's big and looks super cool. Also the speeder inside of it is super cool as well. It's a classic among Lego sets.
I'm still debating on whether or not I should sell my 75054 for the newest 75288. It's such a hard decision!!
Hmm yes it is
@Noah Maldonado
I love my 2014 version too! It looks awesome on my shelf :D
The 2020 one would probably look even nicer, which is why it’s such a hard decision 😂
I have the 2020 one it is great
2014 is trash
Sell the 75054 the 75288 is AMAZING I totally recommend selling the 2014 one.
if 2020 set had a one more SnowTrooper and a rebel trooper and a turret
Three more is best so you can sit them all down
@@anidiot2284 maybe lego planning for 2021 snowtroopers battle pack
@gal adato hopefully
@@galadato7425 that would be helpful
buy the USC Hoth set, it will solve every problem.
Edit: or 75138 if you don’t have that kinda cash
This, does put a smile on my face
for anyone wondering “this monstrosity” is called “dark side developer (9754)” and sadly could only walk forward and backward but it was motorized and essentially released as an early design to a walking lego at-at.
@1:37 Can we just take a second to acknowledge that the quotes in the info card are freaking hilarious! 🤣
Look closely at the 2014 snow troopers one of them is the snow trooper commander from the UCS ATAT that means that the snow trooper commander is not only in the UCS ATAT
I am a HUGE AT-AT fan. I love this vehicles so much. The 2020 version brings so much justice to this iconic vehicle that I thought previous iterations were missing. I can’t wait to get my hands on it.
I’m a huge AT-AT fan too! It’s what got me into Star Wars! Btw, what’s UCS?
ok boomer Ultimate collectors series. It’s a expensive series of sets known to be for adults, they don’t have play features, and are usually 100$+. Look up UCS LEGO models, they’re awesome
I like the 2014 version because I remember wanting it when I was a lot younger. The new just feels smaller.
But it isn't at all
Love the comparison video Ryan! One suggestion - your new ratings system allots quite a few points to opinion relative to the other categories. Maybe you could average the opinion scores of the fans and yourself for the future comparison videos to fix that. Keep up the great work! Can we see a Jedi Interceptor comparison next?
This channel deserves way more subscribers
This is by FAR my favorite upload you’ve done! I’ve seen it so many times
0:00
The council of AT-ATs
I have the 2003 AT-AT, and I've ended up messing with the neck connection to keep it on. While I still love it, I eagerly await the 2020's release- maybe even going so far as to pick up a few of em ;D
Some details are just best on 4483: the legs are properly tugged in underneath the body, whereas on the 2020 version the top joint panels stick out slightly. The side guns on the 2020 version are also situated very far out from the side panels, and sit oddly low. Just a few observations from someone who loves the authentic look of the original filming models
10:03 Referring to the head and neck joint..."Kids could probably break this easy" We did. That head fell off so many times I considered gluing it when I owned the set.
2:50 I got this one for 70 bucks on eBay out of the box but still in the bags with all the minifigures and I love it
I may not be first,
I may not be last,
But when I see a MandRproductions video,
I click fast
Ender Ben same here
@@doggo6024 No? I made this up. Unless u mean something else.
Ender Ben you didn’t make this up lol
GorgeousMoon573 where’s ur proof Sherlock
Millenium Studios honestly I could just say every new video on RUclips lo,
Love the vids man. Never thought i'd get back into LEGO, Thanks man!!!
There should be a UCS AT-AT
Like he said, the motorised one technically is
I can honestly see why. A while back, me and my dad built our own custom AT-AT because we didn't have an official one. It was actually around the size of a UCS AT-AT. Around two minutes after we completed it, it fell apart. It didn't have sufficient support due to other factors. Unfortunately, that's a problem I can't see TLG overcoming currently, they've said so themselves.
Hobo With An Oboe whats UCS?
@@ghosthawkk Ultimate Collector's Series.
@@ghosthawkk are u serious
giving the fact that you have all of the at-at's i am going to rate them like this
1. disappointed by lack of playability and space, the fact that only one at-at driver fits, very inaccurate but I love the color-pattern used by lego.
2. disappointed by the lack of playability that comes with lack of space (2 in 1). Good figures but the fact that it walks by his own is just absolutely mindblowing.
3. disappointed in every way.
4. i like it a lot, lots of space,good figures,good props(blaster,speederbike) and i love the playability. Very cool set over all
5. maybe the best out of all of them, the most accurate, maybe slightly better then 2007 but not by a lot.
I realized that when Ryan was going through the figures, the 2014 SnowTrooper with White Glove and Waist piece is actually A Commander, so The UCS At At isn’t the only At At with a SnowTrooper commander. (You can tell by the torso Printing)
“Man painstakingly scrutinizes his doggos for 25 minutes straight”
Who could have done this
The motorized AT-AT is coolest because it can walk (!), but the 2020 version is most acurate and looks best.
Imagine if the 2020 AT-AT was motorized
@@teafool753 then we would not have the interior spacing that we have, depending on how they'd get the moving mechanism to work.
@@SWDude2710 well we could kinda scale the size up?
@@teafool753 maybe, but that price increase though.
@@SWDude2710 yea true
Had no clue there was so much
Walmart has the AT-AT on clearance for $100. So glad I picked it up. Always wanted an AT-AT as a kid but the sets were always too expensive for me. Wanted to see how the others stacked up against it. 2007 looks pretty cool as well. There's something about that original that I love too. Probably just the nostalgia.
Just bought the 2020 walker I’ve been working way too much to relax and finish it but I’m pretty satisfied with my purchase. Also I love the fact you include inflation adjustments I just appreciate that a lot
When I saw the head of the 2010 version the first thing I thought was, did they use a shovel as turret
Same
Seeing all the AT-ATs.
Echo Base: Well... we're boned.
What set was the "monstrosity" I want to know more about it
Ya
Ah I remember the one on the left side. I was so proud of it.
Great comparison video, my favorite is the 2014 because it was the first over 1,000 piece LEGO I got but when I moved it got lost.
Palpatine: “Each Day we draw closer and closer to........The 501st Battlepack”
I don’t know why but the one from 2014 just feels more pleasant to look at than the one from 2020
Me: clicks faster than lighting
The 68 comments: *henlo*
Lol 😂
Lright henlo is the new meme
(Not hello, did you get it? No? Bruh)
TheFente it’s, been a meme for awhile
@@ZucchiniAT i dont think that you understood the joke
He wrote Henlo and Not hello
TheFente I’m the same guy who wrote the comment
Thankyou so much for doing these reviews and ranking all together I am buying the 2020 At- At!
About that strange decal color for 2010 version: I have the European release of this set and it has a clear back for the face sticker.
Apparently LEGO provided some of those AT-ATs with white-backed sticker sheets by accident. The box art suggests that opaque sticker was an initial design, but eventually they never made them in grey.
Transparent sticker looks better, but it's still a bit fuzzy because of the piece's texture.