Basics of the Ultrasonic Sound Field and why some of your training material might be misleading

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @Kill3rdog48
    @Kill3rdog48 Год назад +1

    THANK YOU SO MUCH! I had trouble understanding the whole side lobe thing in a book of mine. Like I was already thinking that at some angles there would be no energy transfer. Even with normal acoustics. I wish that books would integrate "in practice" more with the theoretics.

  • @subashchandruthangaraj540
    @subashchandruthangaraj540 3 года назад +2

    Super sir, keep doing more videos about NDT and it's Technics.
    I regularly watch your videos

  • @BGIS2000
    @BGIS2000 3 года назад +1

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us make using great illustration for minimizing the confusions.

  • @user-ou9hm9ff1l
    @user-ou9hm9ff1l 2 года назад +1

    老师讲解的非常棒,内容也很丰富。nice

    • @NDE40
      @NDE40  2 года назад

      Thank you

  • @cesardamato7038
    @cesardamato7038 2 года назад +1

    Great explanation. Could you recommend some paper or other literature approaching the effects of bandwidth (or lobes) in the reflected signals?

    • @NDE40
      @NDE40  2 года назад +1

      Unfortunately no - most literature I know on this topic has too many errors in their formulas

    • @cesardamato7038
      @cesardamato7038 2 года назад

      @@NDE40 I get it. But allow me just make a little question. In a PA probe, for instance, you mean that probably I won't see ecoes corresponding to the side lobes due to a "continuous" sound field geometry, since it can have a "wider" bandwidth compared to a "theoretically single-frequency" one? I don't know if I'm clear enough.

  • @prasadams2768
    @prasadams2768 3 года назад +1

    Dear sir, is Near field effects will be there in Dual crystal probe?

    • @NDE40
      @NDE40  3 года назад +3

      Usually dual element probes have "plexiglas" wedges included within the probe and the end of the near field is within those wedges.