AVIONRC IKON 2.5 MAX // Bando Worthy??

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @AlbertKimTV
    @AlbertKimTV  7 дней назад +9

    🛒 AVIONRC IKON 2.5 MAX - rb.gy/dwvx69
    use coupon code "albert kim" at check out for discount
    🔋 Lipos
    450mah 4S - amzn.to/4gzfFB0
    650mah 4S - amzn.to/4dmQMrp
    🎬 IKON 2.5 review - ruclips.net/video/Ua1sZYFUX-Y/видео.html
    🎬 IKON 3 review - ruclips.net/video/91pmlprKO1A/видео.html

  • @HaleFPVRC
    @HaleFPVRC 4 дня назад +3

    Eddie always knocks it out of the park. The only company I’ll even consider purchasing a bind and fly from.

  • @andrew61024
    @andrew61024 4 дня назад +2

    Finally. I have been waiting for this video to come out. Thank you.

  • @jaechoe
    @jaechoe 4 дня назад +2

    I always like replaceable arms, but on a 2.5” you might not break arms as much. But as someone who has broken arms on a 3”, 3.5”, 4”, and 5” frames, if I was to get this Ikon 2.5 I would choose this version with the replaceable arms. 😊

  • @frankcastillo8869
    @frankcastillo8869 4 дня назад +4

    Avionrc is the best bind and fly on the market. Nothing else comes close.

  • @vanlifefpv6340
    @vanlifefpv6340 4 дня назад +4

    Definitely an improvement even if you don't bando bash. The 10g weight penalty is reasonable.

  • @What..a..shambles
    @What..a..shambles 4 дня назад +1

    It's the fact of knowing that you can replace an arm that could sway a purchase, that footage makes me want to go fly 🤠👍🏻

  • @arthurgiourdjian9071
    @arthurgiourdjian9071 4 дня назад

    Great looking quad! I do like how the 03 is mounted right in the middle and not in the back. Reminded me of the Quadmula Djinn f25 but I'm sure this flys slightly better due to the center of gravity

  • @JoshFPV24
    @JoshFPV24 4 дня назад +2

    The tank guys want tiny whoop frames to have replaceable arms. This has gone too far!

  • @felipealvarezsuarez2202
    @felipealvarezsuarez2202 4 дня назад

    Hey Albert, thank you for the content, which one you would choose and why? 2.5, or 3.5 ?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  4 дня назад

      Depends on what I plan to use them for. 2.5 inch for small spaces like a park. 3.5 inch for larger spaces, going longer distances and also for longer flight times.

  • @GR8SCOTT
    @GR8SCOTT 4 дня назад +1

    I like knowing the arms are a little more stout and easily replacable. Thanks for the review!

  • @andrew61024
    @andrew61024 4 дня назад +1

    I wanted to see the updated version because they sell extra arms on the sight so as a new flyer the extra props and overhead bumper for the camera makes me feel a little more confident to fly this drone. I wanted to see a live view before I bought it thank you

  • @pandrews01
    @pandrews01 4 дня назад +1

    That's nice!! The updated frame is nice. The new iterations, is gonna go over well with a lot of individuals who want replaceable arms. Great update. Thanks Albert.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 4 дня назад

    Awesome flying and review, Albert! 😃
    I like it when they hear to us!
    Merry Christmas!
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @painy6588
    @painy6588 4 дня назад

    I ordered a frame since i love bando bashing with quadmula djinn 2.5. Have like 5 of those and curious to try with this frame since ill save some weight with it.

  • @jlarson42
    @jlarson42 4 дня назад

    Nice little flyers. Great having options. Happy flying everyone. 😎