The fact that Sheldon not only does actually allow himself to have an emotional reaction, but also directs it towards the board instead of towards Leonard or Amy, is a really good way of showing that he has actually developed as a person of the course of show
It's actually very common in scientific papers that some made a conclusion (limited by their technology and information) yet later it can be proved wrong. Heck, it doesn't even have to be a gap that long before answering to a paper explaining their possible mistakes.
@@qfzupo2371no they used it to change it to imply some kind of relativist perspective shift was required to observe it… a little bit nonsense but the whole theory is made up so far as I know
First thing to check is if your method disproved the paper disproving the concept
Месяц назад
Also maybe get Russian translator and historian to check first. Very possible in 1978 when USSR still a thing and anti-capitalism was very much in vogue that papers were published for no other reason than to debunk “decadent western capitalist science”. It was basically the same idiocy about decolonizing science or removing whiteness or maleness from academia because of whatever bullshit reason came to power at the time.
I am proud of being a coward if it helps Though I do hope one day to move past it. But I do agree with and practice Sheldons methods of breaking stuff in frustration when I am proving wrong about something I passionately care about rather than yelling at people
The right way to be upset over bad news, be accepting to the messanger, and take your anger out one something else. This is somehow a much better way of being upset than i see many people doing it, dont take your anger out on people
I had this happen to me. I was working on my thesis, had my first draft written and took it around to several professors and committee members for review. I got a note back from one of my Professors to go check out a paper from the 1960's in the library. It was the exact algorithm I had come up with. I actually never completed my thesis after that setback.
@@Number1Irishlad I would have had to completely rework my Thesis. Something like finding a novel extension of the algorithm or a marked improvement on it. So not disproven, but essentially having to start over.
Sure, but when Leonard hands them the translated version of the paper and says the same thing, it's more believable, luckily for them though, they eventually found a new approach that allowed their theory to work.
It's unbelievable but sheldon has an extreme faith over leonard....he trusts him completely to the point leonard sometimes used it for his benefit like when he faked the research in Antarctica
No but these things have a standard method of proving and disproving each other's theories. There no vague interpretations like our day to day conversations
Lowkey sheldon controlled his rage way too much here....any normal person would start planning his villain arc here but sheldon gave his rage a physical form and took it out on one single object instead of people.....a research with the potential to win the noble prize is no joke.....and being told you were working your butt off for nothing has got to be devastating
As a linguist hobbyist who spent literal months reconstructing an entire language based on sparse evidence (most of which I don’t have access to :/) and then a new paper comes out basically invalidating all of my work So, I’ve been there, his reaction is from the soul
It seems to me that this isn’t something to immediately disprove their theory it is just another area to explore. They now have other work to go off and and they can at least see of its limits still apply, or they can at least see those limitations as known ways it doesn’t work, and then they can try to discover if their are other ways. Sheldon would at least want to thoroughly read through this old study, before throwing out his own work and giving up on it.
I get that it sucks but they were only working on it for a few months as compared to the years sheldon worked on other topics. Also sheldon had no problem disproving everyone elses lifes work.
Wait until he discovers that string theory was pretty much debunked a long time ago and he's dedicated his life to a field that essentially boiled down to pure unprovable supposition rather than real physics. Oops.
You approached the context from the wrong angle. In reality, the comment is correct, some form of what was initially a prisoner's dilemma eventually evolved into a tacit collusion between the videogames industry and GPU manufacturers that managed to turn inefficiecy into a profitable business model. Developed around the economics of the video game industry, it resulted in invisible bloat in their games, although there are nuances to that. Game studios generally minimize costs at the expense of everything else, and quality being subjective, it lends itself to be the area that gets affected the most. Nvidia saw the opportunity and decided to turn some science project into a product consumers would pay for but game studios would reap the benefits from, which is the AI/DL scam alienating consumers. Now studios can just integrate the technology into their games/engines, shift the responsibility to GPU manufacturers, which in turn kick planned obsolescence into high gear. My recent favorite example of all this is Marvel Rivals. It's made on UE5, which is known for being optimized to ship games fast at the expense of everything else, and offers Nanite, Lumen, and TAA, 3 of the worst bogus technologies designed for attracting business suits rather than technical people (only the latter two are in the game). Furthermore, the game shipped with DLSS, FSR and XeSS, the whole shebang in super resolution and frame generation, and it's easy to see why. As a live service competitive multiplayer FPS, on lowest video settings with all bs tech disabled, the game still dips below 300fps on my 5800X3D/4090 combo, and I'm still GPU bottlenecked, which is mind-boggling. The game practically depends on these bogus technologies to appear to run decently even on top tier hardware. Now, will the devs eventually fix it? Maybe, if they intend on taking on Blizzard or are serious about eSports. But this also shows how modern game development works, and considering even when the incentive to improve quality is there, the fact that it's dismissed should serve as a telltale sign for other games with not quite as much reason to improve quality since, for example, 60fps is considered enough by the majority of consumers. The video also mentions consoles and makes a point about general target hardware configurations, and on the same note, I've seen people saying developers should optimize games based on the Steam hardware survey. Thing is, where in the past it used to be a matter of how could developers extract the most out of the hardware, nowadays is how much they can get away with by throwing hardware (and abstractions, more on it below) at the problem. It stands to reason that, based on that, target hardware requirements are an afterthought. Interestingly, this is somewhat true for consoles as well, despite the fact that, historically, it used to be the contrary, where devs would innovate and optimize the living word out of games, compared to now where they only need to ensure stable frame rates throughout the game, and they basically cheat to achieve that. This is also part of a general trend in modern software development, where problems are solved by building more and more layers of abstraction, most of which are geared towards reducing costs at the expense of everything else. In computer science, one gets a glimpse of how powerful today's hardware really is, and that theoretically, there are very few specific computing tasks that should take more than a noticeable amount of time to finish, and we usually know most of them by name. And yet, in the real world, you're constantly reminded how your hardware is nowhere near enough by things ranging from choppy phone app screen transitions or scrolling, to batteries expected to last only a single day on cutting edge phones, to browsers becoming memes for consuming the entire RAM of a PC, to games being more buggy and consuming more resources while looking and playing the same or worse than years or decades prior. The future for software quality and performance looks bleak at best, and there's no end in sight. Remember this next time you're building a new PC, which should be sooner rather than later. Think of the stratospheric prices as, among other things, a tax to fund all of this.
1978.... I remember back in 50's? I think that some guy said there's no more scientific stuff to be found and all there is to find is more precise measurements. PS: i am paraphrasing
Here's the thing I would continue to look into a super asymmetric due to the fact that our understanding of science changes which means some old theories are possibly true but our understanding of science is different from when the theory was disproven
Kinda of outta character for these three. In earlier episodes theyd love to tell him his work sucks just like Sheldon never misses an opportunity to tell them whenever their work is bad
One of the most consistently annoying things about a lot of scientific studies is they conclude something as being impossible where majority of the time its simply a lack of technology in that current time, Scientists said the helicopter was impossible da vinchi was ridiculed by the scientific community of his time for his inventions that tended to not work due to a lack of technology such as light weight metals for the frames of his flying machines these were not even concived of at the time once discovered things like planes were possible, same with the submarine and automation.
I always found it odd that Sheldon just BELIEVES Howard's translation. He constantly shittalks Howard whenever he can, yet he just takes his Russian translating skills at face value?
This kinda proves Sheldon about Leonard and Howard lacking in their talent with science. The date is a dead give away that it doesn't disprove anything Sheldon and Amy were working on.
It did disprove it... a Russian already explored the concept before any of them were born and disproved it's validity. The solution was to recontextualize the observer perspective which accounts for the reason that invalidated the theorem... it was a good idea hence why someone already explored it before any of them were born but that guy didn't go far enough to overcome the initial set back.
Funny cut, but it doesn't allow me to feal Sheldon's very real pain... Emotions have always been hard for Sheldon, and this scene is like 2nd best in the whole series at showing us that Sheldon actually has emotions... First is obviously the finale where he gives his speech... But this physical pain not directed at Lenard might be a close 2nd to Sheldon's growth... Still a childish outburst, and nonetheless the super Asemetry threory eventually is proved anyway.
Maybe it's because he's low key an awful person, crazy arrogant and a textbook case of a person being a "fucking asshole" and subconsciously it just doesnt feel right to enjoy any type of plot, which would involve Sheldon, yet won't, at least at some point of the narrative, establish how much of a failure of a person he truly is. Like come on, the only possible satisfying plots around Sheldon's persona realistically can only revolve around some terrible failures of his or debilitating suffering he'd be forced to endure.
Was the scene with Sheldon's breakdown meant to be seen as comedic or serious? Because cutting at the scream makes it the butt of the joke, but if the scene continues, it might lead to character growth.
Honestly the way he handles the reaction already is indicative that he has grown. He spaces out, but then refocuses and thanks leonard even acknowledging that it most have been difficult to consider telling Sheldon, which shows self awareness, then he goes and directs his anger at one specific thing instead of lashing out at he people. It’s a reasonable crashout especially compared to season 1 Sheldon.
The fact that Sheldon not only does actually allow himself to have an emotional reaction, but also directs it towards the board instead of towards Leonard or Amy, is a really good way of showing that he has actually developed as a person of the course of show
@@Nvggs
You seem to have misread his comment.
@@Nvggsdid you like your own comment because who else would? Read it again it says "The fact that Sheldon not only [DOES] allow himself..."
That’s a very poor measure of what it means to be human if all it takes to be human is not to beat up the messenger of news.
@@j.burgundy499You misunderstood the comment, OP is talking about Sheldon as a character/person
@Nvggs the reaction is voluntary, feeling the emotion isn't.
Valid crashout. Ngl I'd prolly do the same
Me when I lose a ranked match
*probably
Oh I myself WOULD have broken the board a few more times before screeching like a Banshee...
@@johnclaybaugh9536you’re lame
@@SimplyThinking677 I'm educated. You'll work until you're 86.
It's actually very common in scientific papers that some made a conclusion (limited by their technology and information) yet later it can be proved wrong. Heck, it doesn't even have to be a gap that long before answering to a paper explaining their possible mistakes.
That’s what happened in the show
@@qfzupo2371no they used it to change it to imply some kind of relativist perspective shift was required to observe it… a little bit nonsense but the whole theory is made up so far as I know
Think there was a similar story about Einstein. He had a theory, later realised it didn't work, years later it was proven true.
@@Brainship. Pretty sure I saw a clip of Neil degrass Tyson mentioning a story like that about Einstein and dark matter
@FuriousFlyer57 yeah the guy who demoted Pluto.
First thing to check is if your method disproved the paper disproving the concept
Also maybe get Russian translator and historian to check first.
Very possible in 1978 when USSR still a thing and anti-capitalism was very much in vogue that papers were published for no other reason than to debunk “decadent western capitalist science”.
It was basically the same idiocy about decolonizing science or removing whiteness or maleness from academia because of whatever bullshit reason came to power at the time.
That's true and all, but it's a 22 minute comedy television program.
(plus the original document was in Russian)
@@christophernoneya4635 OK first learn Russian then check the paper
@@crazyt1483 yes, before you can publish a paper you need to learn every language on earth to be sure it hasn't be disproven in it
“Of course we are!” Never heard someone so proud of being a wimp.
I am proud of being a coward if it helps
Though I do hope one day to move past it.
But I do agree with and practice Sheldons methods of breaking stuff in frustration when I am proving wrong about something I passionately care about rather than yelling at people
Howard built a life for himself and would much rather live to enjoy it. His reaction is understandable and rational
I'm pretty sure it's more of being honest rather than being a coward. Rather than avoiding the question, they basically say it straight out.
Kinda proud of Sheldon for not taking out his frustration on Leonard... That poor whiteboard tho
Nah, f the whiteboard for existing 😂
😂@@herosdiaz8757
“Excuse me while I have a breakdown” type reaction.
The right way to be upset over bad news, be accepting to the messanger, and take your anger out one something else. This is somehow a much better way of being upset than i see many people doing it, dont take your anger out on people
Like another comment said, this is a lot of growth for Sheldon instead of taking it out on someone else.
I had this happen to me. I was working on my thesis, had my first draft written and took it around to several professors and committee members for review. I got a note back from one of my Professors to go check out a paper from the 1960's in the library. It was the exact algorithm I had come up with. I actually never completed my thesis after that setback.
I'm curious, is it completely impossible to finish your thesis? Like, was it a flatout "i've been proven incorrect" or just a setback?
@@Number1Irishladmore like a “it’s already been done” and can’t have a thesis on something already proven.
@@Number1Irishlad I would have had to completely rework my Thesis. Something like finding a novel extension of the algorithm or a marked improvement on it. So not disproven, but essentially having to start over.
@@Ethan-gw6mi yeah the excuse of "But it's on a computer this time at scale" wasn't cutting it.
But, isn't it unrealistic to be expected to dig thru all of human knowledge to see if something has been done before or not?
It seems unlikely that Amy & Sheldon would accept Howard'a word without verifying.
That's why it ca.e from leneord so he'd believe him
Sure, but when Leonard hands them the translated version of the paper and says the same thing, it's more believable, luckily for them though, they eventually found a new approach that allowed their theory to work.
It's unbelievable but sheldon has an extreme faith over leonard....he trusts him completely to the point leonard sometimes used it for his benefit like when he faked the research in Antarctica
No but these things have a standard method of proving and disproving each other's theories. There no vague interpretations like our day to day conversations
Yeah, but its not really just Howard's word. Howard just found the paper
that Wallowitz guy is definitely the best actor of the bunch lmao
I agree. The actor that plays him is Simon Helberg
That was sheldons lifes work, that must have been awful for him.
I mean to be fair he thought of the idea on a whim at his wedding like 3 months before this episode
Thought his life's work was string theory
@@janise01 Well if an idea that my wife and I came up with on our wedding was rendered completely useless, I would honestly crash out too.
“AGHHHHHHH” dumbledore said calmly
Or course theyre cowards
One of them literally says "Sheldon is one accident away from becoming a super villain"
Howard: Yes, we are.😂😂😂
That's the sound of acceptance.
Yes we are 😂
Thank you for cutting the music at the important pat. Helped sell the emotion.
Subbed!
Proud of Sheldon here. That’s a good way to react. Much better than other examples of his reactions
That scream came from the soul
All things considered, he took it really well
"you guys are such cowards" heck, his name rhymes with the word😂
[Sheldon will remember that]
Seeing him upset hurts. He worked so hard on this and it all crumbles in an instant.
"Howard translated it" seems like Sheldon's first fall back position , but you do you...
Leonard-you guys are cowards😂😂
Howard-yes we are we are not dealing with Sheldon😂😂😂
“You guys are such cowards.”
“Yes. We. Are.”
XD
Sheldon making a lego toda death sound 💀
love that Howard knew Russian because he had to learn it to go to the ISS.
He took that surprisingly well.
If i was Sheldon i would want it translated multiple times by multpile professionals.
On the whole i think sheldon took that fairily well
I think he took that very well
Im surprised he didn't get angry at Howard and even thanked him.
Valid Reaction coming from Sheldon LMAO
The way things are going it was probably mistranslated.
Nah sheldon and amy just disproved the disprove 🗿 such a chad move ngl
@@HarmandeepSingh-fy5zt If the proof was "The super-symmetry is inherently flawed", I wouldn't say it's much work discrediting the claim.
I mean it is flawed, that was like the only part in the show when they went science fiction when they got the noble
A neuroscientist is solving string theory math with ease...
This can happen only on tv😅😅
You know ive been there. I always try to redirect my anger
He took it rather well :D
Yep, he handled it as an adult 😅
I thought he was going to reject the news based on "Howard translated it."
People over estimate how much Sheldon doesn't respect him.
Howard got into space through Russian instance of NASA and was traveling with Russians so he probably learned the language and Sheldon knows it
It would disprove there hypothesis because it not a theory till you get data
its would be more funny if they let sheldon disprove the string theory himself.
the one he chasing for all his life.
Never seen Sheldon yell
It seems like they are all afraid of the power couple referred to as "Shamy."
Sometimes older studies are flawed and often it's based on an older understanding. It has to be very strong in the debunking.
Lowkey sheldon controlled his rage way too much here....any normal person would start planning his villain arc here but sheldon gave his rage a physical form and took it out on one single object instead of people.....a research with the potential to win the noble prize is no joke.....and being told you were working your butt off for nothing has got to be devastating
“Hey sheldon you were WRONG! WRONG WRONG WRONG. Ahahaha! Suck it Sheldon !” That was easy
Thank god he didn’t over react
As a linguist hobbyist who spent literal months reconstructing an entire language based on sparse evidence (most of which I don’t have access to :/) and then a new paper comes out basically invalidating all of my work
So, I’ve been there, his reaction is from the soul
It seems to me that this isn’t something to immediately disprove their theory it is just another area to explore. They now have other work to go off and and they can at least see of its limits still apply, or they can at least see those limitations as known ways it doesn’t work, and then they can try to discover if their are other ways. Sheldon would at least want to thoroughly read through this old study, before throwing out his own work and giving up on it.
Addison in the feeling of working hard on something only to find out you done completely wrong now you have to start from scratch
I get that it sucks but they were only working on it for a few months as compared to the years sheldon worked on other topics. Also sheldon had no problem disproving everyone elses lifes work.
Wait until he discovers that string theory was pretty much debunked a long time ago and he's dedicated his life to a field that essentially boiled down to pure unprovable supposition rather than real physics. Oops.
He didn't even read it
You approached the context from the wrong angle.
In reality, the comment is correct, some form of what was initially a prisoner's dilemma eventually evolved into a tacit collusion between the videogames industry and GPU manufacturers that managed to turn inefficiecy into a profitable business model. Developed around the economics of the video game industry, it resulted in invisible bloat in their games, although there are nuances to that.
Game studios generally minimize costs at the expense of everything else, and quality being subjective, it lends itself to be the area that gets affected the most.
Nvidia saw the opportunity and decided to turn some science project into a product consumers would pay for but game studios would reap the benefits from, which is the AI/DL scam alienating consumers.
Now studios can just integrate the technology into their games/engines, shift the responsibility to GPU manufacturers, which in turn kick planned obsolescence into high gear.
My recent favorite example of all this is Marvel Rivals. It's made on UE5, which is known for being optimized to ship games fast at the expense of everything else, and offers Nanite, Lumen, and TAA, 3 of the worst bogus technologies designed for attracting business suits rather than technical people (only the latter two are in the game). Furthermore, the game shipped with DLSS, FSR and XeSS, the whole shebang in super resolution and frame generation, and it's easy to see why.
As a live service competitive multiplayer FPS, on lowest video settings with all bs tech disabled, the game still dips below 300fps on my 5800X3D/4090 combo, and I'm still GPU bottlenecked, which is mind-boggling. The game practically depends on these bogus technologies to appear to run decently even on top tier hardware.
Now, will the devs eventually fix it? Maybe, if they intend on taking on Blizzard or are serious about eSports. But this also shows how modern game development works, and considering even when the incentive to improve quality is there, the fact that it's dismissed should serve as a telltale sign for other games with not quite as much reason to improve quality since, for example, 60fps is considered enough by the majority of consumers.
The video also mentions consoles and makes a point about general target hardware configurations, and on the same note, I've seen people saying developers should optimize games based on the Steam hardware survey.
Thing is, where in the past it used to be a matter of how could developers extract the most out of the hardware, nowadays is how much they can get away with by throwing hardware (and abstractions, more on it below) at the problem. It stands to reason that, based on that, target hardware requirements are an afterthought. Interestingly, this is somewhat true for consoles as well, despite the fact that, historically, it used to be the contrary, where devs would innovate and optimize the living word out of games, compared to now where they only need to ensure stable frame rates throughout the game, and they basically cheat to achieve that.
This is also part of a general trend in modern software development, where problems are solved by building more and more layers of abstraction, most of which are geared towards reducing costs at the expense of everything else. In computer science, one gets a glimpse of how powerful today's hardware really is, and that theoretically, there are very few specific computing tasks that should take more than a noticeable amount of time to finish, and we usually know most of them by name. And yet, in the real world, you're constantly reminded how your hardware is nowhere near enough by things ranging from choppy phone app screen transitions or scrolling, to batteries expected to last only a single day on cutting edge phones, to browsers becoming memes for consuming the entire RAM of a PC, to games being more buggy and consuming more resources while looking and playing the same or worse than years or decades prior. The future for software quality and performance looks bleak at best, and there's no end in sight.
Remember this next time you're building a new PC, which should be sooner rather than later. Think of the stratospheric prices as, among other things, a tax to fund all of this.
Guys, I think, right? I just think Sheldon might be a little wee bit angry. A bit far fetched, i know
1978....
I remember back in 50's? I think that some guy said there's no more scientific stuff to be found and all there is to find is more precise measurements.
PS: i am paraphrasing
Here's the thing I would continue to look into a super asymmetric due to the fact that our understanding of science changes which means some old theories are possibly true but our understanding of science is different from when the theory was disproven
Terrence Howard's body of work is bbt
Kinda of outta character for these three. In earlier episodes theyd love to tell him his work sucks just like Sheldon never misses an opportunity to tell them whenever their work is bad
Reasonable reaction, I'd do the same
He took that well
I'm fairly certain the first scene wasnt in the original broadcast
That sounded like a T- Rex scream
One of the most consistently annoying things about a lot of scientific studies is they conclude something as being impossible where majority of the time its simply a lack of technology in that current time,
Scientists said the helicopter was impossible da vinchi was ridiculed by the scientific community of his time for his inventions that tended to not work due to a lack of technology such as light weight metals for the frames of his flying machines these were not even concived of at the time once discovered things like planes were possible, same with the submarine and automation.
I hate the adorkable theme of this show, BUT THE COMIC TIMING IS SO ON POINT
This seems to be the peak of what the writig team can accomplish when trying to describe actual science.
Crashout was reasonable
Me when i almost win PUBG but get killed in the last circle ... 😂
Sheldon is not going to be happy about this 😢😂😂😂
"the theory is disproven" with no details whatsoever as to how it was disproven. dude could've been wrong. Howards translation could've been wrong.
if they can see that the math is correct, it doesn't matter if the translation has errors.
Soooo second time Sheldon lose against a Russian physic..
Almost everything has already been thought of
I always found it odd that Sheldon just BELIEVES Howard's translation. He constantly shittalks Howard whenever he can, yet he just takes his Russian translating skills at face value?
Or you just drop it on their desk anonymously.
I would have bolted out of there
He could have still published it disproving the Russian model.
Wait so just cause some old guy says that his theory is wrong that means he should just give up
Damn that truth kernel
What season and episode was this?
This kinda proves Sheldon about Leonard and Howard lacking in their talent with science.
The date is a dead give away that it doesn't disprove anything Sheldon and Amy were working on.
It did disprove it... a Russian already explored the concept before any of them were born and disproved it's validity. The solution was to recontextualize the observer perspective which accounts for the reason that invalidated the theorem... it was a good idea hence why someone already explored it before any of them were born but that guy didn't go far enough to overcome the initial set back.
Completely valid
Uh yeah, no. Scientists are in the business of finding out information. Having a theory disproved is AS valuable as having a theory confirmed.
Ya, id be pissed too. Thats years of reaserch wasted.
Funny cut, but it doesn't allow me to feal Sheldon's very real pain... Emotions have always been hard for Sheldon, and this scene is like 2nd best in the whole series at showing us that Sheldon actually has emotions... First is obviously the finale where he gives his speech... But this physical pain not directed at Lenard might be a close 2nd to Sheldon's growth... Still a childish outburst, and nonetheless the super Asemetry threory eventually is proved anyway.
Even though I know the outcome that made me wanna cry a bit
Unless of course, the Russian was wrong about super asymmetry being flawed
He did not like that
Why does seeing Sheldon like that please me?
Maybe it's because he's low key an awful person, crazy arrogant and a textbook case of a person being a "fucking asshole" and subconsciously it just doesnt feel right to enjoy any type of plot, which would involve Sheldon, yet won't, at least at some point of the narrative, establish how much of a failure of a person he truly is. Like come on, the only possible satisfying plots around Sheldon's persona realistically can only revolve around some terrible failures of his or debilitating suffering he'd be forced to endure.
How are Shamy collaborating on anything? Their fields are completely different.
Poor Sheldon
Sheldon wasn't happy
Damn Schizoid Central over here. Take your lithium lol
Yes we are!😂
Was the scene with Sheldon's breakdown meant to be seen as comedic or serious? Because cutting at the scream makes it the butt of the joke, but if the scene continues, it might lead to character growth.
Honestly the way he handles the reaction already is indicative that he has grown. He spaces out, but then refocuses and thanks leonard even acknowledging that it most have been difficult to consider telling Sheldon, which shows self awareness, then he goes and directs his anger at one specific thing instead of lashing out at he people. It’s a reasonable crashout especially compared to season 1 Sheldon.
Tbf, if I was Sheldon's friend, I would be a former friend so goddamn fast.
I haven't watched this season but how exactly does Amy contribute to a model on string theory?
How would we know the validity of a Russian scientific research paper?
Please stop using the white light stripe going through the video! It’s annoying!
Howard translated it he graduated from MIT I don't trust him to read Russian well😂😂😂
i do the same with my magic decks