Space Engineers - The Deadliest Weapon Yet, Terminal Gravity Acceleration Warhead Torpedo

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • Terminal Gravity Acceleration Warhead is the concept of both using and controlling gravitational fields in a way to create a stable but extremely dangerous weapon. It works a lot like an HEAT were the initial reaction shoots a object into it creating greater damage.
    -------------------------------------SA­GE Info------------------------------------­------
    Care to join Video Sage Steam Group, & possibly help me build, pilot, and crash some ships in the future? steamcommunity....
    ------------------------------------- LSG Info------------------------------------­------
    Join my space engineers empire steamcommunity....
    Oh and our Facebook page: / laststa

Комментарии • 1,8 тыс.

  • @supahxsoldier99
    @supahxsoldier99 10 лет назад +897

    Imagine this someone hits you with this there's no external damage and you start to laugh before you realize you've lost all power and to find the stone in your ship and your reactor destroyed. Oh the evil deceit.

    • @B1scu1twolf
      @B1scu1twolf 7 лет назад +17

      and that the stone is in the place where the reactor was xD

    • @Vainglory100
      @Vainglory100 6 лет назад +1

      AugustoP wow...

    • @dutchstylz5531
      @dutchstylz5531 5 лет назад +3

      im just glad my ship has a countermeasure to this -that one dude 5 years later

    • @Amoth_oth_ras_shash
      @Amoth_oth_ras_shash 5 лет назад +2

      @@dutchstylz5531 Guess thats when the grinder droid torpedo followes the gravity one..

    • @obsidironpumicia4074
      @obsidironpumicia4074 4 года назад +3

      @@B1scu1twolf "How the fuck did my reactor turn into a meteor???"

  • @ShatteredLoyalty
    @ShatteredLoyalty 5 лет назад +584

    Greetings from 2019. I've come to inspect the ancient tomes

    • @F_n298
      @F_n298 5 лет назад +7

      nice

    • @bigblockman11
      @bigblockman11 5 лет назад +10

      Well I think you just hit a jackpot

    • @BobyChanMan
      @BobyChanMan 4 года назад +36

      Holy shit, I didn’t realize till I read your comment that this video was from 2014

    • @ImJustJAG
      @ImJustJAG 4 года назад +21

      2020

    • @russellmmo_8454
      @russellmmo_8454 4 года назад +5

      @@ImJustJAG Same here

  • @chrisemerson1501
    @chrisemerson1501 10 лет назад +378

    So it's not only a shaped charge, it's payload also works almost as a HEAT round?
    That's nasty. I like it.

    • @ryanh6586
      @ryanh6586 6 лет назад +6

      I was thinking the same thing

    • @StellarBeatsOfficial
      @StellarBeatsOfficial 5 лет назад +27

      Not HEAT, But HEAE (High Explosive Anti Everything)

    • @thenthson
      @thenthson 5 лет назад +3

      I want to see him launch mines with this system

    • @vinisaid4000
      @vinisaid4000 5 лет назад +4

      Exactly like a HEAT round

    • @Anvilshock
      @Anvilshock 5 лет назад

      its* payload

  • @HaloStrategist
    @HaloStrategist 10 лет назад +309

    Add compartments BEHIND the gravity cage where guys can sit inside and you have yourself a breaching missile with people to board afterwards mwahaha

    • @HaloStrategist
      @HaloStrategist 10 лет назад +44

      Also, on heavy armor the stone itself penetrating is good enough. It would rattle around inside doing damage to sensitive equipment unnoticed until it's too late. Truly a fearsome weapon.

    • @chasedean4032
      @chasedean4032 5 лет назад

      Or add more stone compartments

    • @theprincipalityofbelka4646
      @theprincipalityofbelka4646 4 года назад +3

      Stratego89 you could also add a drill type of weapon that digs through and then throw a nuke inside

    • @theprincipalityofbelka4646
      @theprincipalityofbelka4646 4 года назад +2

      Stratego89 if you put more than one stone it could rip a small ship in half. I tried it with 10 stones on a ship with 8 layers of medium armor

  • @BandNerdcp
    @BandNerdcp 10 лет назад +140

    Wouldn't a gravity shield basically completely nullify this though? Ah, the constant battle between armorers and weapon makers.

    • @trinitygod863
      @trinitygod863 10 лет назад +11

      well I guess that's your only real defense against it if your really worried

    • @trinitygod863
      @trinitygod863 10 лет назад +4

      ya, it has to override the gravity gens on the projectile, and if they over lapped them it will be very hard to counter

    • @Trolls90Degrees
      @Trolls90Degrees 10 лет назад +4

      Chris God Well your all forgetting a big part, You have to AIM the shot, so if your target is moving at more then 20+m/s then you wont be able to accurately hit.

    • @maxx_2245
      @maxx_2245 10 лет назад +12

      Lt.Person Thats why its meant for BIG ships, with BIG hulls, for BREACHING it. I can actually see a war where one side uses this misille to breach the hull and send a boarding party.

    • @Trolls90Degrees
      @Trolls90Degrees 10 лет назад +3

      maxx2245_2012 Again, Innless the ship is REALLY slow you wont be able to get a direct hit.

  • @theanthemofcreationitself9005
    @theanthemofcreationitself9005 5 лет назад +146

    My brother has watched this video and so have I. I have 7 layers of heavy armour on the ships which aren’t manoeuvrable enough to dodge the warhead. My brother thinks I am stupid enough to not use this strategy and over time he has reduced his armour to 3 layers of light armour...the whole Time I have had these warheads and a hidden factory on a well hidden planet that is manufacturing these warheads 24/7. Now is my time to strike. I have modified one with a seat so I can board directly giving me direct access to his 3 earth weeks of resources. I will not be controlled

    • @thegdpwhytea439
      @thegdpwhytea439 5 лет назад +13

      How'd it go?

    • @theanthemofcreationitself9005
      @theanthemofcreationitself9005 5 лет назад +33

      It went very well. The one with my seat on was destroyed but I survived. His 3 weeks of resources were actually warheads which I didn’t know at the time but he was foolish and armed them. It was evident what his cargo was when his ship got obliterated by the hundred or so warheads inside.

    • @theanthemofcreationitself9005
      @theanthemofcreationitself9005 5 лет назад +19

      My modified one was destroyed and his cargo was warheads (I didn’t know this at the time) he for some reason had armed the warheads so tasted victory when his ship disintegrated.

    • @thegdpwhytea439
      @thegdpwhytea439 5 лет назад +12

      @@theanthemofcreationitself9005 Lol, fair game.

    • @aidanhancock2117
      @aidanhancock2117 5 лет назад +12

      @@theanthemofcreationitself9005 i built a huge black tube that i convinced my friends was a super nuke and i had tons hidden in secret silos using some slight of hand, never been raided since.

  • @kalebhoward129
    @kalebhoward129 8 лет назад +93

    I feel like your missile is either going to rip a ship a new one, or just majorly confuse the enemy, because a random rock is in their ship with no actual hole that it could have gotten in through

  • @EllenRipley1979
    @EllenRipley1979 9 лет назад +199

    I built a gravity ore launcher with 12 gravity generators. It makes a massive damage through 13 layers of heavy armor.

    • @madsmller6097
      @madsmller6097 8 лет назад +2

      +Roberto Alvarenga xD

    • @Connorses
      @Connorses 8 лет назад +6

      +Alien What happens if someone damages it while it's still attached to your ship? :D :D :D :D

    • @EllenRipley1979
      @EllenRipley1979 8 лет назад +9

      C O N N O R S E S
      bad things. It isn't that effective anymore

    • @OryxTheMadGod3
      @OryxTheMadGod3 7 лет назад +2

      Attack its weak spot for massive damage

    • @raaston9761
      @raaston9761 6 лет назад +6

      Alien I made one that uses around 200 gravity generators plus it works like a railgun via multi stage rocket and gravity generators speeding ir up

  • @pigpig252
    @pigpig252 10 лет назад +71

    that was awesome how it got imbedded in the target. I love how you don't have to stick to set weapons in this, you can create your own using the basic physics of the game

    • @mechanist2055
      @mechanist2055 6 лет назад

      Foehammer he created a teleporter

    • @raaston9761
      @raaston9761 6 лет назад

      Foehammer agree I made a thhtws or twin hammer head turret war ship becuse it has 2 huge turrets that look like the head of q hamer head armed with weapons every weapon in the base game plus modded ones also I added the tgaw due to it's poor ability to move becuse of the twin hammer head turrets it makes up in fire power also it is a part of my main ship the meteor the thhtws are the turrets on it the main body is what allows fast movement of the thhtws

    • @minimalgrammar1276
      @minimalgrammar1276 5 лет назад

      Yes.

  • @user-cg9fe4zq8p
    @user-cg9fe4zq8p 9 лет назад +37

    Just imagine this "You're in your ship hanger, about to board your fighter because you saw a huge battle ship. As you're going to it, you hear an explosion and a big ass rock flies through the wall of your ship. You look at the rock and where it came from, and you see it went through 2 layers of heavy armor."

  • @RevwdGaming
    @RevwdGaming 10 лет назад +163

    So if you shoot a ship that uses heavy armour, they will think your missile failed and that they have time to escape or attack, but once they start moving, there ship is slowly being ripped apart from the inside? sweet! lol

  • @Smetanol_
    @Smetanol_ 10 лет назад +470

    Why to launch giant torpedo at 50 speed, when you can build (semi)automatic railgun, that can launch useless stone at 100 speed from standing still ship?

    • @EariosRandomness
      @EariosRandomness 10 лет назад +70

      Imagine building that railgun as a defense mechanism on your base.

    • @Smetanol_
      @Smetanol_ 10 лет назад +48

      EariosRandomness It's not supposed to be on base, it would be very difficult to use.
      So basicly building giant movable and turnable space cannon with storage of stone is the most cheap way of destroying big ships/stations.(and you can even make it into shotgun!!!)
      I'm not sure how would you make that thing into turret, cause you would probably endup using rotors, that would result in way too manual targeting, and still you would get blind zones for being attacked.
      Railgun ship though can be really small (only one gravity generator(get more for higher speedup), conveyor setup with storage and deploying mechanism(that probably is the most dificult part of this ship), few engines, gyro and generator, and cockpit ofcourse)
      You even can disassemble full of stone storage just infront of gravity generator to get REALLY big rock.(though it's just one use, but with power of a old spice body wash!!!)

    • @PsylomeAlpha
      @PsylomeAlpha 10 лет назад +10

      Павел Таранов
      just have a basic ship with a gravity well strapped underneath it or whatever, maybe have the torpedo with the thrusters on the back of it, and have it latched on with landing gear, so that once you release it it flies forward on its own instead of you needing to run at the enemy.

    • @hindugoat2302
      @hindugoat2302 10 лет назад +4

      Павел Таранов if i have 2 cargo containers that are connected with a conveyor, and one cargo container is destroyed, will its contents be lost or moved to the connected cargo

    • @Smetanol_
      @Smetanol_ 10 лет назад +4

      Hindu Goat everything that was in destroyed container will be dumped in the center of it, so you'll get bunch of items floating where container was. 1 item per each stack, I think. (so you can get really big stack, filling container with only one type of item)

  • @StockySky290
    @StockySky290 10 лет назад +128

    i made this and tested it on heavy armor it imbedded in my friends ship without him knowing then he flew away and made a gash in the side of his ship made it to the thrusters and broke half of them.

  • @user-rh1qd1qm5v
    @user-rh1qd1qm5v 10 лет назад +261

    Ok, now make a TGAW that launches a smaller TGAW that will explode inside the ship.

  • @lukelarris
    @lukelarris 10 лет назад +34

    Man, Aaron seems to have a lot of trouble with his lab exploding every time he discovers something new :P

    • @chribbatt
      @chribbatt 10 лет назад +4

      The Alfred Nobel of Space Engineers!

  • @charlesdark2861
    @charlesdark2861 8 лет назад +43

    I know why it was not ripping up the outside armour, and instead getting imbedded. It was because the rock is moving so fast, That the game has a hard time calculating the damage it does, So the game just says "Idk what to do /:" and just makes it penetrate or get imbedded.

  • @falcothegreat5470
    @falcothegreat5470 4 года назад +3

    The warheads against heavy armor accurately simulated how a bullet travels through flesh;
    The projectile has a small entry wound with a damage trail that gets exponentially larger. I find those game physics cool

  • @darkfire321000
    @darkfire321000 5 лет назад +4

    I could see this being mounted to the front of a small boarding ship and acting as some form as "instant door" type of weapon, allowing easy quick access to the internals of a ship or base

  • @cgerman5
    @cgerman5 10 лет назад +18

    You should launch the super-duper-mega-destructive-rock-warhead against a ship to see what the damage would be like against an actual vessel, instead of a wall

  • @ckaldariaq5904
    @ckaldariaq5904 5 лет назад +8

    "Fire the TWAG!~" Dude killed me every time.

  • @mba1234
    @mba1234 10 лет назад +11

    Challenge: Use two TGAW's and penetrate 3 ships and a 10 layer light armor wall.
    If it goes through that much.. Um..
    I think your TGAW is a deadly weapon against light armor and certain heavy armor.
    Awesome video.

  • @Sawer
    @Sawer 5 лет назад +1

    its more like an RPG than you think. You basicly made a shaped charge, thats why RPGs have that same look.
    This is amazing

  • @annoytanor007
    @annoytanor007 10 лет назад +32

    awww, you didn't try it on a ship. That thing is awesome though.

  • @mikeanonymous4678
    @mikeanonymous4678 4 года назад +4

    2020 and this is still fascinating

  • @apache917
    @apache917 10 лет назад +18

    drawing skills = Leonardo da Vinci

  • @karbengo
    @karbengo 9 лет назад +12

    This look amusingly like the anti-matter bomb concept. A mass of anti-matter is kept confined inside the warhead within a powerful magnetic field. On contact with the target, the magnetic field is released, the anti-matter annihilate with the target matter and release an incredible amount of energy in the form of a colossal explosion.
    In this case, there is no matter/ anti-matter interaction, but the restrictive force field is there. Brilliant design.

    • @bernardi5919
      @bernardi5919 9 лет назад

      +karbengo that idea is very efficient, because you only need a tiny bit of antimatter to create a large explosion. It wouldn't even a totally unmanageable amount of antimatter to destroy planet earth itself.

    • @chrisheyburn1546
      @chrisheyburn1546 9 лет назад

      +karbengo Doesn't antimatter only destroy as much matter that it has
      meaning, ig you have 1 kilogram of antimatter, it will destroy one kilogram of matter
      or does some sort of explosion happen when they interract

    • @bernardi5919
      @bernardi5919 9 лет назад

      So, I think that maybe an explosion happens in some complicated manner, and antimatter is detonated in a complicated manner, like how nuclear detonation works.

    • @basslingerland4783
      @basslingerland4783 8 лет назад

      +Bernard Isosceles yes, the 1 kilogram of normal mass would be turned into pure energy created one hell of a blast.

    • @bernardi5919
      @bernardi5919 8 лет назад

      you don't just set uranium on fire in a closed container, you use a complicated process to create a powerful blast and spread radioactive fallout everywhere. with antimatter, it's the same principle, except without the radioactivity

  • @notaword1136
    @notaword1136 8 лет назад +6

    I just realized the damage left from the warhead to heavy armor is like poison you don't see it but it has ripped everything apart.

  • @Bull_10RR
    @Bull_10RR 9 лет назад +52

    Why didnt he use tungsten as the penetrating material?
    It is mote effective than other due
    To the mass density

    • @Bull_10RR
      @Bull_10RR 9 лет назад +4

      Fuck yeah!

    • @James-rr2rq
      @James-rr2rq 9 лет назад +3

      Worstname evar someone should make a giant ship that holds a small asteroid and see how many layers it can break now

    • @apollo4294
      @apollo4294 4 года назад

      James can you move asteroids?

    • @alisonxavierlopes9219
      @alisonxavierlopes9219 3 года назад

      @@apollo4294 no

  • @Laylander
    @Laylander 10 лет назад +9

    In my opinion this is the first actually usefull weapon beside the rockets and miniguns.

  • @noctis1927
    @noctis1927 8 лет назад +4

    I know what I am gonna do to my ship now. 15 layers of heavy armour here I come to build

  • @nikofinman
    @nikofinman 10 лет назад +33

    but if the enemy ship has one gravity generator that creates gravity downwards? wont that just tear your torpedo apart?

    • @DeepInsideZettaiRyouiki
      @DeepInsideZettaiRyouiki 10 лет назад +3

      I see someone already though about same. Only thing that is a problem with Magneto-Shield is additional gravity sources fucking around movement inside of the ship as we can only change gravitation zone around generators...we cant move it outside of its center and Shield needs its range to stop Torpedo. Still this is way to big and expensive to damage it inflicts...and this damage is a result of beta code and bugs.

    • @nikofinman
      @nikofinman 10 лет назад +4

      Pro Toss
      yeah but if a ship just has like maybe 2 gravity generators pulling people down to the ship, so that they can walk on it, wouldnt that pull the rock in side of the torpedo towards the bottom of the torpedo too?

    • @vukpsodorov5446
      @vukpsodorov5446 10 лет назад +3

      nikofinman
      no, the gravity field inside the torpedo is equal, and you will have the same gravity pull no matter how much generators you have (i think) and then they will affect the rock after it went into the ship, out of the torpedo gravity field which means it will crush the bottom of the ship

    • @HippieInHeart
      @HippieInHeart 6 лет назад +1

      yes, for destroying (stationary) ships or bases with gravity generators, you should probably use a weapon that doesn't rely on gravity. maybe the lotus or something like that. for non-stationary ships, i think this weapon is not good anyway, because small ships can dodge it very easily and big ships will probably not have much trouble with shooting it down before it reaches it's target.

    • @bigblockman11
      @bigblockman11 5 лет назад +2

      @@HippieInHeart im not so sure about that this is just probably an early prototype, with some rocket engines and a camera this thing could go really fast making it hard to hit or a scale down model that can be used like a HEAT torpedo

  • @IneptOrange
    @IneptOrange 10 лет назад +8

    o....m....g....
    best idea ever:
    have a pod exactly like yours exept, have a compartment in the back of it with loads of seats and a door! therefor, when it hits the target, the rock will fire through the ship, leaving a huge hole, maby have the claw idea that you previously made so that it grips the ship and when it has a good grip and an enterance (the hole) the crew come out of the door and go through the hole in the enimy ship!

  • @greenscorpeon3
    @greenscorpeon3 10 лет назад +14

    you should try thease weapons on real ships to tell if weapon is efective, because it is not that easy to hit ship (posibly with slopes) compeared to a giant wall

  • @trizkit995
    @trizkit995 9 лет назад +3

    What about mounting that device on a crash pod. It seems to cause little damage to the delivery vehicle.
    Makes it controllable and doesnt require close proximity of your larger more expensive craft. Added bonus the crash vehicle method gets your crew in the action faster then the target can respond.

  • @mr.oddlyfox6934
    @mr.oddlyfox6934 5 лет назад +10

    *Let's draw a ship.*
    Went a whole different direction with that.

  • @vinisaid4000
    @vinisaid4000 5 лет назад +5

    That works like a real HEAT round

  • @JamesLikesBubblegum
    @JamesLikesBubblegum 10 лет назад +5

    The target was like a red-shirt from Star Trek
    But you probably already knew

  • @weeshooting0978
    @weeshooting0978 4 года назад

    This is so nostalgic for me, I just got the game today and I've remembered you from years ago

  • @HB-pe1nv
    @HB-pe1nv 5 лет назад +3

    You do realizes you just revolutionized space warfare

  • @frederickpbalfour6321
    @frederickpbalfour6321 7 лет назад +3

    make a barrel with a ejector at the end, set up gravity generators to launch the projectile down the barrel, i used gravel, and you have an automated mass accelerator

  • @L0rdLexan01
    @L0rdLexan01 9 лет назад +8

    Idea: Colonizer
    Basically a 3x3 or 5x5 Tube of large ship Blocks, with a Life Support wheel attached. The front end has drill on it, while the back end splits Open in a flower Petal kind of way with Rotors. The Petal Part contains many useful bits to survive, such as some Small reactors, cargo containers, and Welding Tools and such. The front end is a big drill that drills a whole in the Surface of an asteroid up to the Wheel. to Jettison the unneeded rocks, have an Ejector on the back of the petal, that uses a Gravity Flinger (Like with what you have here) to blast them into space.If you wish, you can have the front of the drill have a Hole in it, so you can start an Underground colony. (Note: I understand this isn't needed in small clans and is expensive, but 50 Member clans who need more space dould do this!

  • @GrimTheYeeter
    @GrimTheYeeter 10 лет назад +1

    That is just... That is beautiful. I loved your grappling hook idea with the claw and what not, but THIS! This is just wonderful. So many times have I wished to be able to get through heavy armor in the past, in various other video games, but you just can't with normal explosives. This idea though is just genius. You get the kind of penetration needed to go through heavy armor. Now if only you could stick explosives to that rock or put more than one rock inside. Get a shotgun effect going on. Why use one rock when you can use several? Hahah... So many good ideas. Also I love the ship's design.

  • @gryphonadams1412
    @gryphonadams1412 10 лет назад +6

    Think of making a buckshot version, multiple stones in a small 6-way gravity chamber.

  • @robertrenato
    @robertrenato 3 года назад

    My goodness... RUclips brings this up again, I remember watching it. 7 years ago! Thanks for making me feel old yt xD

  • @wuznab5109
    @wuznab5109 6 лет назад +5

    I remember this video, this was the video that introduced me to space engineers, and to buy it.
    Thank you.

  • @Attaxalotl
    @Attaxalotl 5 лет назад

    KC book of spaceships lists this weapon as "Extremely dangerous, can kill on sight, priority target"
    This thing can tank an anthem class star destroyer(2 layers of Heavy armor!).

  • @BorisGrishenco
    @BorisGrishenco 10 лет назад +7

    That's guy is genius.

  • @zeph6182
    @zeph6182 10 лет назад

    If you're correct about how the warhead works, it will ALWAYS have the same effect despite velocity/inertia. The damage is purely based off of the reactive force of the rear gravity generator after the initial collision. I'm sure if you produced a larger warhead and got several steel plates to rotate around a boulder solely about the Z-axis, as well as provided a unequal z-axis pull you could produce a shotgun-blast with a very, very, very broad area of effect, and still maintain the same penetration, if not greater. The only con would be that you would HAVE to launch the warhead at a high velocity as well as close to the target. Also, any space and resource-related efficiency is great, as anyone who uses these missiles would want to arm as many ships as possible with them, and put as many of them on a ship as possible. Brilliant design, once again wish I had both the game and a supercomputer.

  • @PolishProgrammer
    @PolishProgrammer 5 лет назад +5

    Yeah in c&c was one Terroris general that was talking like that.
    1 [*] in comments = fixing my soul destroyed by nostalgia
    And yeah...
    2019 :)

  • @arandomsquaredaweighsailor742
    @arandomsquaredaweighsailor742 4 года назад +1

    Wow jeeze this guys an actual engineer

  • @baphydevil3830
    @baphydevil3830 10 лет назад +15

    YOUR A MAD MAN A MAD MAN I SAY

    • @discokossan
      @discokossan 10 лет назад

      YOU'RE *

    • @Mike_Masaki
      @Mike_Masaki 10 лет назад +1

      yes he is a mad man but the design is insanity

  • @morerobot6927
    @morerobot6927 9 лет назад +1

    I would have made a slimmer missile that holds a small cargo container and connector. Then design it to kind of latch on to the enemy ship somehow, perhaps landing gear that automatically locks on to the enemy ship. Once locked on, turn on the gravity generators which are designed to accelerate mass, and then launch mass constantly out of the connector. Until the enemy ship can remove it, you will have this thing flinging deadly mass continuously into the hull of the other ship.
    ALSO: Instead of relying on your ships speed to release the torpedo at whatever speed you were going, use either a thruster or gravity launcher to launch the torpedo from the launch tube. You could also use a "conveyor" of wheels with a landing gear at the rear end for loading and holding the missile.

  • @hojer95
    @hojer95 10 лет назад +6

    What happens when the warhead is fired upon in flight and the first gravity generator is destroyed before the extended launch site? please make a video on that :)

    • @shygirl101020
      @shygirl101020 10 лет назад +1

      it would lunch at them so basicly even if you destroy the thing you are fucked

  • @lordorion5776
    @lordorion5776 7 лет назад +6

    "who has more then 3 layers of heavy armor" i do! And graphene armor too!

    • @battlecat3071
      @battlecat3071 7 лет назад +1

      lincoln king onions have may layers

    • @lordorion5776
      @lordorion5776 7 лет назад

      but do they have heavy armor?

    • @Paddeiii
      @Paddeiii 7 лет назад

      what about cake? cake has layers too

    • @lordorion5776
      @lordorion5776 7 лет назад

      how heavy is it? will it stop a .50 cal?

    • @rotti911
      @rotti911 7 лет назад

      lincoln king

  • @ghost_ship_supreme
    @ghost_ship_supreme 6 лет назад +1

    You should call these SAPPERS! Or SAP shells! (Super armor piercing!)
    Or sappers for short! This works even better because a sapper is someone who digs or penetrates enemies defenses!
    They even look and act similar to AP shells, and seem just or more as effective!
    Except for the odd effect on heavy armor, where it doesn't actually show the penetration in some areas... it's almost like the quantum effect where electrons can "jump" over small distances seemingly teleporting to the other side of metal, such as in processors.
    Maybe because of this, the shells could be called QAPS (quantum armor piercing rounds)?

  • @ivan9066
    @ivan9066 10 лет назад +7

    you've made HEAT ammo 0_0 you are the lord of destruction ! Geil :D

  • @taemanai5887
    @taemanai5887 7 лет назад

    Works off the same principle as a bunker buster. Warhead damages the armor before the stone even hits. Best part is, if you use this against an actual ship with heavy armor instead of just a wall, the stone is going to bounce inside the ship where all the 'soft' material is. It's definitely a ship killer, provided you can hit a ship. Maybe mount a boarding hatch behind the stone so you can enter through the breach?

  • @willbrack7069
    @willbrack7069 10 лет назад +7

    Imagine being the faction that has to recover and find out what caused the destruction of that ship your just removing the armor and all the sudden you see a giant uranium rock there what would you say

    • @rokkraljkolesa9317
      @rokkraljkolesa9317 9 лет назад

      How the hell did this one little chunk of space ore manage to do this much damage? WE NEED TO RESEARCH!

    • @Kozaki09
      @Kozaki09 9 лет назад +2

      Oh Look! A uranium ore!

    • @L._.A-06
      @L._.A-06 6 лет назад

      I would probs think it was just a asteroid that drifted in

  • @VeronicaVenatrix
    @VeronicaVenatrix 10 лет назад

    That is a pretty nice design. :) I mean it'd be lucky to hit anything moving at a decent speed, but I could definitely see it cracking some slower capital ships.

  • @mitchh8389
    @mitchh8389 9 лет назад +4

    You should do a second video on this to show if this still works with all the changes to SE

    • @TheDarkFable
      @TheDarkFable 8 лет назад

      I does you just have to properly manipulate the fields

    • @zamasu7530
      @zamasu7530 4 года назад

      XDarkFableX not on xbox

  • @actualhyena
    @actualhyena 10 лет назад

    An updated version of this would probably have a grouped set of thrusters, eliminating the need to go to ramming speed. Merge blocks could be set to release it, meaning not only will the warhead be calculated in the Center-of-Mass, but this could completely add a whole new level of control to your design. I wouldn't mind a look back at this.

  • @ikkas00
    @ikkas00 10 лет назад +16

    would it be possible to make a suicide bomber type design that can be loaded into a carrier so that you can launch it and control it to the target and then jump off before impact

    • @stevenaudsley
      @stevenaudsley 10 лет назад +2

      Try having the cockpit seated at the very back of the Ship and maybe with his force field design just surrounding the platform and with multiple warheads at the front! :)

    • @ikkas00
      @ikkas00 10 лет назад

      i dont have the game but i thought the idea might work in theory. especially now that there might be remote control cockpits

    • @AgropolSokoowoTV
      @AgropolSokoowoTV 10 лет назад

      or have like a escape system

    • @TheAnrasRune
      @TheAnrasRune 10 лет назад +7

      ikkas It works. I tried it out and I must say, you have broken my server. Me and my friends just wreck each other with them now. -_-
      But yea, for those that have the game, making a somewhat large cell with the cockpit at the back, then accelerating to speed, switching off dampeners and jumping out = obliteration. One issue though is the relatively thin armor means they can be shot down pretty easy, so have some spares!

    • @ikkas00
      @ikkas00 10 лет назад

      haha. well sorry and your welcome i guess :P

  • @suspiciouscheese4518
    @suspiciouscheese4518 3 года назад

    This hasn’t worked for years and RUclips is still recommending it to me.

  • @devanleeduncan6848
    @devanleeduncan6848 10 лет назад +7

    i used it on my friends bombardment ship and it was obliterated! I took out his engines and his reactors. He then crashed into his own platform.

  • @IceLordCryo
    @IceLordCryo 10 лет назад

    +10 respect points for playing my second favorite C&C game ever

  • @williamhammann3170
    @williamhammann3170 7 лет назад +3

    can't u simply make the missiles themselves a ship with the back of them having some small quarters for crew and doors on the side so u can have an aircraft carrier spit em out and they'll ram into ships, breach, dock, and board. I think that'd be pretty neat. anyway great design truly ingenious 11/10 IGN that's A-Ok to me pal

  • @keegeebee5392
    @keegeebee5392 10 лет назад

    I have an idea, place a power source, surround it with gravity generators, so any ships passing will either 1. be sucked toward it and crash or 2. have it sucked toward them and crash. either way it does large kinetic damage, without even using explosives

  • @tery215
    @tery215 10 лет назад +8

    5:09
    Red shirt star trek grunt?

  • @theridonculesknights
    @theridonculesknights 10 лет назад +1

    I feel like torpedoes would only work only work on stationary targets, like stations. So that's probably what that would be used for.

  • @NoOneAnymore520
    @NoOneAnymore520 10 лет назад +5

    Huh... I'm really late but.... That heavy armor bit towards the end where it only penetrated in the back... Reminds me of... Naruto actually... When Sasuke and Naruto are fighting on the roof and his rasengan looks like it did no damage to the water storage unit (Forgive me I forgot the name) but in the back end it's blown outwards.

  • @dominict9325
    @dominict9325 9 лет назад +1

    This is a frakking amazing design, and crap, holy crap, 10 layers of light armour and it tore it apart. This weapon would devastate even the biggest ships, it'd just tear them into pieces. Only problem I see is it's not going to be easy to actually land a hit on an enemy. The weapon doesn't really have a lot of range on it, a few hundred meters max. So you'd have to get really close, and considering the fact that the size of ship required to use one of those things makes sneaking up on an enemy wouldn't exactly be a plausible way of getting the attack. They see a massive ship heading towards them with massive cannons or whatever they think it is heading toward them, they see it not firing, and they're like:
    "Oh hey, look, that thing probably needs to get close to us. Let's shoot it down!" Even if they're unable to shoot it down, it's going to be pretty easy to avoid the warhead hitting them given how much warning they'll get. Plus, with the design, a few fighters could totally fly in there and shoot the rear gravity thing to bits and make the weapon backfire and hit you instead.

    • @CrashCraftLabs
      @CrashCraftLabs 9 лет назад

      i think his ship was ment to have 4 ramming pods on it so i doubt the enemy would even realize the parts come off, add a few guns to make them think you just a big pile of dung, by the time they realize your ramming them like that it would be too late

  • @TheNevada666
    @TheNevada666 10 лет назад +7

    I can all ready see Big ship's crew's Yelling RPG

    • @onyxguardian1756
      @onyxguardian1756 10 лет назад +4

      Wouldn't it be GPR? (Gravity Propelled Rock)

    • @jeremak
      @jeremak 10 лет назад +4

      Jack Girdlestone
      Or a "Space Panzerfaust"

    • @Dunkerque351
      @Dunkerque351 10 лет назад +1

      jeremak
      No no no A Space Panzershrek!

    • @Aracnah
      @Aracnah 10 лет назад

      schreck ;)

    • @Dunkerque351
      @Dunkerque351 10 лет назад

      Sorry,I'm not German. :)

  • @brandonhowe5017
    @brandonhowe5017 Год назад +1

    I know I'm majorly late to this (released on PS4/5 recently), but if this still works to some effect, does anyone think it could make gravel useful? Think about it: Clang destroyed his factory with an inventory-dropped item, so in theory, couldn't we use this approximate technique to make a gravel "rail"cannon using a throw-out connector? I do have to start with the admittance that I'm still pretty new to Space Engineers, but I have ideas.
    I think if the torpedo portions of the design were scrapped, the free-floating object housing could be retrofitted to have an opening on the front surrounded by gravity generators, mostly for redundancy (because stuff is subject to damage during combat) and have a connector port in the center of the housing's rear, also surrounded by gravity generators in case stray shots critically damage one. During a "loading" process, gravel could be expelled into the housing via connector ejection, then once a suitable volume of shot/debris has been loaded, the connector ban be closed off, the cannon's aim can be finalized, then finally the gravity generators around the opening of the housing can be turned off to set the gravel on it's way, like a massive, cost-effective space shotgun (which the game is currently lacking). Alternatively, depending on the muzzle velocity, distance to target, and the server/save's stray object limit, you could potentially just disable the generators around the opening, and I'm assuming the ejector would dispense gravel items one after another, effectively creating a GMG, or gravel machine gun!
    I dunno, maybe I've gotten a solid idea out of the TGAWT, but I'm guessing I'm probably too much of an inexperienced rookie or that things have changed since then. I like the crazy Idea, but I feel like the TGAWT would be a pain and too obnoxious to reload, so that's why I thought of substituting mostly useless gravel. If it works, gravel could be a more consistent, more reliable and logistically simpler munition made from a cheap and annoyingly overabundant byproduct.

  • @JHorsti
    @JHorsti 10 лет назад +5

    Can you release your torpedo in the steam workshop? My version just doesn't work.

  • @johnliberi7131
    @johnliberi7131 5 лет назад

    Each of the gravity points are strung together in the center at the stone like a venn diagram. They all are pulling at the stone at the same force and keep it stable. Imagine that state as the moment right before they hit a trampoline. The stone is the person and the gravity above, below, left and right of the stone are the springs of the trampoline. When the warhead crashes into a target, the stone is propelled backward by the sudden loss of pull. This is like when the person dips down into the trampoline from their jump. The springs have to be equal force, equidistant, and numerous to be able to overcome the displacement of the person. Their force is in an elliptical path just like the gravity fields in your warhead. If you add more gravity fields equidistant and of the same force, just like the springs, you can get an even higher velocity for the stone. Imagine a trampoline with half as many springs, they have a much lower weight limit and are generally used for smaller children. In the case of your warhead, more “springs” can increase the velocity. You could accomplish this two ways. More, separate gravity points, or instead, making the “springs” longer. Putting gravity points on the outer side would act the same way as making a trampoline spring longer. In this case, you may have to make the warhead larger. I hope this bit of physics helps make even bigger booms :)

  • @Gabriel-Kazu
    @Gabriel-Kazu 9 лет назад +4

    please tell me you have a vid of these being used against an opposing ship.. please!!!!

  • @cherriberri8373
    @cherriberri8373 8 лет назад

    I thought up something but I don't have the patience or time to test it and modify it. Here is my idea.
    Basically, you have that odd gravity shooter that LastStandGamers made, then some sort of room behind it in which people can then get out through a door into the actual gravity chamber, through the hole, and infiltrate the ship. It's a nice little idea since I noticed that when you launch the torpedo perfectly straight it get's perfectly cut in half. I can answer questions, so ask if you're confused about it and want to build it or similar.

  • @shiftyjesusfish
    @shiftyjesusfish 8 лет назад +3

    Could you not use the gravity generators and the mass blocks to have it accelerate itself?

  • @tytyguy1able
    @tytyguy1able 7 лет назад

    Dude you weaponized SE's buggy collision physics!!! That's amazing

  • @sparkyjohan
    @sparkyjohan 9 лет назад +7

    Dont use metal as your ammo, then you give them resources to repair with. ;)

    • @gamingbadace6685
      @gamingbadace6685 9 лет назад +1

      The ammo either disintegrates or flies out into deep space either way it wouldn't be enough to to repair whole ship :P

  • @leokeatonn
    @leokeatonn 5 лет назад

    remember when space engineers used to look like this, really cool to see how far its come since then.

  • @tomclarke9786
    @tomclarke9786 9 лет назад +5

    Onions have layers...ogres have layers

  • @ViperiousTAW
    @ViperiousTAW 9 лет назад

    Really love the design of this. Against light armor, this baby just shreds everything all day long. What I found interesting was against heavy armor it almost seemed to phase through the armor. You basically have a multipurpose ammunition; breaching against light armor and phasing against heavy armor to target key systems.

  • @alandoherty5804
    @alandoherty5804 10 лет назад +7

    What about putting a warhead inside the gravity well?

    • @JacobAvnerPr1mus3
      @JacobAvnerPr1mus3 10 лет назад +4

      Putting in a warhead would simply explode. His weapon would send a large rock through the ship. If the stone is embedded and the victim tries to move, the rock will shear through the ship. For explosives, you can just put a very simple missile together.

    • @101m4n
      @101m4n 10 лет назад +1

      This works because the rock cannot be destroyed.
      These days with artificial mass, you can use a gravity generator to accelerate a "cloud" of warheads. Far cheaper and more devastating, even than this :)

    • @JacobAvnerPr1mus3
      @JacobAvnerPr1mus3 10 лет назад +1

      Some one tested that, its kind of unstable actually.

    • @damonholden9655
      @damonholden9655 10 лет назад +1

      Yeah. lsg actually tests it in a later vid

    • @user-cz6ge5qb2x
      @user-cz6ge5qb2x 10 лет назад +1

      Jacob Avner THAT'S THE POINT. The most unstable, tends to be the most effective.

  • @Nanoelite001
    @Nanoelite001 10 лет назад

    The really devious thing about this is that to the person being struck by this weapon, it doesn't look like it did any thing, so you start moving and all of a sudden your ship's being gutted

  • @maxw799
    @maxw799 5 лет назад +3

    Why can't you build thrusters into the warheads themselves?

  • @danielfeagin3846
    @danielfeagin3846 9 лет назад +3

    You should call it the C.L.A.W. Catastrophic Launching Armament Warhead.

  • @hectormartinez3465
    @hectormartinez3465 10 лет назад +4

    use it as a battering ram

  • @StuddMuffinn_YT
    @StuddMuffinn_YT 10 лет назад

    If you have two generators running at half capacity you can turn them off and you can for from your ship. You could have a friend that would drops stones into it as soon as you fire. You now have a semi auto gravity gun. :)

  • @HisCarlnessI
    @HisCarlnessI 10 лет назад +9

    What about several rocks?

    • @HisCarlnessI
      @HisCarlnessI 10 лет назад +9

      Also, this weapon would be great if you hit the ship in the front and it traveled the length of the ship taking out lots of key systems.

    • @vukpsodorov5446
      @vukpsodorov5446 10 лет назад

      it wouldn't be able to travel the ship in any direction except downwards of the ship has gravity generators, because the rock is affected by gravity.

    • @VallornDeathblade
      @VallornDeathblade 10 лет назад +2

      vuk psodorov that should just curve the ball through it which means if you hit at the right angle you can do even more damage as the ball accelerates further due to the gravity fields.

    • @colemiller2149
      @colemiller2149 10 лет назад

      Vallorn nice thinking

    • @ajsmudkipminecraftrealm4229
      @ajsmudkipminecraftrealm4229 10 лет назад

      All I'm thinking is ultimate boarding weapon

  • @catbert7
    @catbert7 10 лет назад

    This game and its players are so brilliantly creative. Seems really educational too even though some of the physics is clearly inaccurate it gets you thinking about physics and engineering and exploring possibilities. Great stuff.
    And kudos on the quantum tunneling stone :P

  • @sleestalk
    @sleestalk 10 лет назад +5

    what if you just made a ship thats an entire acceleration gun.
    ?

  • @maxwelldanger1929
    @maxwelldanger1929 4 года назад

    One use Warhead, reusable launch tube, HEAT like projectile...
    You made a space RPG, nice.
    Just had a thought, if instead of 1 gravity generator you used 4 in a diamond pattern then added some grabbers on the front, you can put a door on one end, and use it as a boarder!

  • @Yuki_Ika7
    @Yuki_Ika7 8 лет назад +65

    i like to call it "The Saitama"
    can anyone see why?

    • @moelordkaito9891
      @moelordkaito9891 8 лет назад +2

      well done...

    • @twilight_phantom2969
      @twilight_phantom2969 8 лет назад +6

      hahaha. although I imagine more damage could be done with a larger scale version.

    • @realunknownlegacy
      @realunknownlegacy 8 лет назад +2

      +Stevonnie Jenkins Cause it only take One Punch.

    • @zimizi
      @zimizi 8 лет назад +2

      +Stevonnie Jenkins cause you an anime fanboy :X ?

    • @Murr1can
      @Murr1can 8 лет назад

      +zimizi but how would you even know that anime without being a fanboy?!? COINSCIDENCE? I THINK NOT!

  • @certified0093
    @certified0093 7 лет назад

    I made my own version yesterday, with spherical gravity generators on the outside, so when the tip of the missile is destroyed, multiple small rocks go both forward and bend outwards. Its very bad for your frames, but it does the same stuff this missile does, except the exit hole is massive.

  • @ApocalypticBang
    @ApocalypticBang 10 лет назад +4

    It's MAST, not MASK.

  • @geeksqueak7123
    @geeksqueak7123 10 лет назад +2

    That would be good for destroying internal components without damaging the ultrastructure of the ship :D

  • @supadumi5489
    @supadumi5489 7 лет назад +5

    This weapon, powerful as it may be, is not a viable weapon.

    • @indie3135
      @indie3135 7 лет назад

      Arctology101 The reaper missile is much better than this

    • @blockbros9299
      @blockbros9299 7 лет назад

      Arctology101 how?

    • @HippieInHeart
      @HippieInHeart 6 лет назад

      probably because small ships can dodge it very easily and big ships have too much defensive turrets so it would get shot down before it reaches it's target.

  • @TheXenovia
    @TheXenovia 10 лет назад +1

    If you wanted to make a cool gravitational force project you could make an ODST drop pod by making a DP and making a place to put a heavy weight and attach several gravity generators to the bottom, but have them turned on with no power, so once you turn on the power it will take off. Or you could adjust your TG warhead to be self propelling and add a crew station to it

  • @GrasshopperKelly
    @GrasshopperKelly 10 лет назад +9

    Why do you show us these things! Now we can use it against you!

    • @MrMyers758
      @MrMyers758 10 лет назад +8

      Not really, gravity does not work the same any more. 4 gravity generators in opposition to each other just creates no gravity in the game, not centralised gravity

    • @GrasshopperKelly
      @GrasshopperKelly 10 лет назад +2

      even though the gravity physics are changed you still show us way too much. you could be owning us but you show us how to gang up on you! :D

    • @GrasshopperKelly
      @GrasshopperKelly 10 лет назад

      Same on my device. No need for them now anyway:) got orbital gravity generators :)