_Manufacturing Consent_ is actually more of Edward S. Herman's work than Chomsky's, oddly. It's based on his earlier model outlined in _Corporate Control, Corporate Power._ R.I.P. Professor Herman.
FYI, I think it’s an excerpt from the movie Manufacturing Consent. If you haven’t seen it, it is definitely worth tracking down. The best film about Chomsky’s political work and about American media and politics ever.
@@lorenzomcnally6629 Chomsky is basically a gatekeeper like other intellectuals like Buckley, Vidal, Sowell etc. They say and do just enough to make it seem like they are cynical and contrarian but all work for the elites.
Concision only allows to repeat conventional thoughts since pre established beliefs/opinions don't need to provide evidence. Unconventional thoughts on the other hand are expected to provide evidence, since they challenge pre established beliefs, which cannot be done properly under concision.
I think it could be possible to strike a balance between concision and elaboration. A versatile linguist would be the best person to know how to pitch their message to suit the venue and audience. Nowadays, someone can say seemingly sensational things, as soundbites, and encourage the audience to get more in depth information from their blog.
+JE Hoyes You make a very valid point. You have to know the context that the message will be broadcast on, and then make sure that you can deliver the goods (your thesis) accordingly. To complain otherwise does not get you the visibility that is needed to bring the change you desire. It seems almost arrogantly selfish. If you want to be heard, then make whatever effort is necessary to get the message out. I think the word is sacrifice.
‘ Concision implies you aren’t propagating new thoughts. ‘
Neptune here, Chomsky's right
hahaha, brilliant!
That advert at the end after cutting off Dr. Chomsky - "quality information and quality communication" - 😂
It's so blatant 😂
So concise
This man is just so glorious
nice and concise slice of Chomsky ;)
Concision, Rose Knapp. It doesn't take much more time than a six-second sound byte.
_Manufacturing Consent_ is actually more of Edward S. Herman's work than Chomsky's, oddly. It's based on his earlier model outlined in _Corporate Control, Corporate Power._
R.I.P. Professor Herman.
@Abu Tayi what's he keeping the gate from
@Abu Tayi elaborate? Sounds a bit too general and overly simplified.
No it's not
The introductory parts on corporate ownership are Herman. The bulk of the book deals with examples and that's Chomsky
and now we have podcasts
btw what a well put together video
FYI, I think it’s an excerpt from the movie Manufacturing Consent. If you haven’t seen it, it is definitely worth tracking down. The best film about Chomsky’s political work and about American media and politics ever.
It's rather funny how both Greenfield and Chomsky act like they have no clue who the other is despite obviously being very familiar with one another.
They are oblivious to other human beings.
Both are supreme examples of sociopaths.
@@lorenzomcnally6629 Chomsky is basically a gatekeeper like other intellectuals like Buckley, Vidal, Sowell etc. They say and do just enough to make it seem like they are cynical and contrarian but all work for the elites.
@@lorenzomcnally6629You're a sociopath
Amazing editing
Good film! Thank for your work!
Noam Chomsky - Concision
Concision only allows to repeat conventional thoughts since pre established beliefs/opinions don't need to provide evidence.
Unconventional thoughts on the other hand are expected to provide evidence, since they challenge pre established beliefs, which cannot be done properly under concision.
what a great clip
The usual suspects as he calls them prepare very carefully and are coached
Is his voice speeded up??
Where can I find the full lecture?
What is the intro song called? 0:34
Full video please
ruclips.net/video/EuwmWnphqII/видео.html
@@philkariuki1109 I've already watched the documentary
lol
I think it could be possible to strike a balance between concision and elaboration. A versatile linguist would be the best person to know how to pitch their message to suit the venue and audience. Nowadays, someone can say seemingly sensational things, as soundbites, and encourage the audience to get more in depth information from their blog.
+JE Hoyes You make a very valid point. You have to know the context that the message will be broadcast on, and then make sure that you can deliver the goods (your thesis) accordingly. To complain otherwise does not get you the visibility that is needed to bring the change you desire. It seems almost arrogantly selfish. If you want to be heard, then make whatever effort is necessary to get the message out. I think the word is sacrifice.