I'm gonna have to side with the other commenters here and say you just need to work on game sense and not raw aim. Back in the day I was LEM and almost got SMFC multiple times and that was done on a 60 hz monitor.
Great test, I have 240hz tn and 165hz ips, and honestly, I fail to see a difference, at first I thought I did, for years, but then I recorded some tests myself and these days I got my highest ELO on 165hz ips... on paper 240hz and 1ms is better, but in practice, I failed to ever record more than less 1 frame of difference, and even then it was not 1 full-frame, but partially transition from one to another. 4ms and 1ms feel exactly the same, I can barely notice 165 hz vs 240hz, I can consistently score 150-160 ms reaction time on both, so I'm not too "slow" to notice.
@@skullkraken_resurrected9857 bro are you stupid, shall i explain to you why they are ALWAYS at the same? because on 60 frames wich is lit more then half from 144 (sry think i needed to tell ya since you are not very smart i guess) you have less pictures wich means your charakter moves but your fuckn monitor can only show every 2nd picture and 1 that is missing wich cant be shown duo the low Refreshrate. just because you cant SEE the one step doesent mean your charakter doesnt move, your monitor was lit just to slow to show you the frame. there is no GAME DELAY, it is lit just a DELAY for YOUR Monitor. games run always the same on ANY HZ MONITOR when you play a pvp game wich is always on a fuckn server, the only dif is how much of the movement your monitor is able to print out for you. That is called a Serverside and a Userside. the game server runs the same, it wouldnt make any sense if you see things ''earlyer'' then others when you all play lit on the same game server. If you look at a person walkn on the street and a car drives by so you cant see him anymore doesent mean he stoped movn? so when the car passes by the person is at a diffrent position then before. so just because you havent seen it, does it mean the person has a ''delay''. people are just retarded holy moly, use your brain.
Actually the enemy appears early on higher refresh rates as compared to 60Hz. So 60hz keeps you on disadvantage as you would see the enemy on a delay and react late.
@@adm1ralq Eye doesn't have framerate. It captures light stream at 790THz, so in a way it sees at 790 trillion fps. That's how you look at eye's framerate. Eye doesn't scan retina like cameras scan cmos, it's constantly streaming raw data to your brain. Your brain doesn't have framerate either. Your brain constantly tries to use the least amount of information that is required to understand surroundings, but it doesn't cut it in images per second it analyzes motion and color changes etc. and prioritizes eventa that trigger something interesting. We would have to know how fast your neurons are firing the data from your eyes to your brain. Pennsylvania School of Medicine estimates that eyes send 10 million bits of data per second to your brain, but that doesn't translate to framerate either. US army has conducted test that can in some way be relative to framerate. They flashed images from 100/1 to several thousandth of a second and some of the tested people were able to recognize shown objects even at 1200th of a second flash. Take this information how you like, it's just not possible to think human capability to see as framerate.
The main thing we want is lower input lag. Which is provided by higher HZ monitors. So yeah, we absolutely want 240 HZ. And even 360 HZ if ever possible.
The gamers at the same level , the people has higher HZ monitor has more advantage. I remembered there is a video shows that the ordinary player with higher hz monitor vs game player pro, the ordinary is shotting faster than the pro on the head.
A completely ridiculous video. Hz only provides clarity in the streaming image. There's no such thing as a man leaving the wall too early. If the delay times are equal in both images, you will get the same image. When the Hz is high, you will only see the man's output fluently, that's all. These images are completely deceptive. Server ping and screen lag will only allow you to see that guy early. If this Hz value is high, you will see this early. These are just commercial traps.
thats just dumb af, if the guy is 1 pixel from apearing, it will show first with higher refresh rate, while the 60hz is just waiting to tp the guy back when reefresh cycle ends, if you actually played any fps games you would see the diference lol
@@SamuelPiresNBruh, yeah but hz i like: x Hz: 0+++0+++0+++0+++0 x*2 Hz: 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 So one of frames in higher frequency will be the same as on lower. Object can appear a little earlier on higher frequency but big difference is only at smoothness. Video is incorrect, 60hZ can't always be behind 144gZ and more, it will and must lineup sometimes. Fake
@@ВіталікБритан-х7ч you dont understand, our brain works by filling up the gaps with information that it didnt receive, just like frame gen, to make our vision smooth, the more frames you got going into your eyes, the better and faster the prediction is, example, your eyes see an enemy running from cover, the first frames are the most important so our brain can calculate speed and the amount of tracking you need to do, the more frames you have, the more safer assumptions your brain can do, like velocity, position, etc. 60hz will not always be behind 144hz, but 144hz will always be faster, watch this video (ruclips.net/video/Q1cmhZs1P54/видео.html) and try to see if you can predict the movement of the car, try slowing the video even more, or speeding it up, you will see that your brain captures much more information at higher refresh rates, giving you an advantage.
@@ВіталікБритан-х7ч and yes it will lineup "some of the times" but a pro with 144hz that can do "most of the times" has an advantage over you, and that can mean win or lose a 1v1. i was years and years silver and gold in fps games, and the momment i got my 27 inch 165hz monitor i climbed to plat and diamond
Киноклоуны в 240гц , как же вы будете играть с теми у кого 500 гц, по вашим понятиям они вас будут видеть на перед ещё до начала раунда😂. КЛОУНЫ ОНИ И В АФРИКЕ КЛОУНЫ😂.
@@bensslightnature i do ive played 60, 144, 244 and ive gone back to 60 on games that i have low fps on when i play games like csgo or valorant etc i play 144 as i sold 244 didnt see any difference by that could be due to my low reaction time
@@scorpionners valorant my peek was ascendant csgo is kinda useless cuz global is easy asf to get so highest faceit level is 8 got bored and back in the day ESEA A+ still have it actually
I suffered 1000 hrs to reach nova. I just thought I'm really bad at this game. Now I know being poor is a crime.
I was a global elite and my screen is 60hz
stop making excuse ur just bad
@@leminhtri2984 yeah, I guess so
Nope. You're just bad.
I'm gonna have to side with the other commenters here and say you just need to work on game sense and not raw aim. Back in the day I was LEM and almost got SMFC multiple times and that was done on a 60 hz monitor.
i got 144Hz now, big difference from 60Hz.
Well it makes a difference but
Racing games at higher refresh rates is beyond game changing, genuinely improved my driving.
I recently bought RTX 4070 and i was finally able to run 240hz monitor and the difference is night and day
* i was playing on 60hz before
Congrats man
just got a RTX 4070 also looking to run the same hz haha what monitor did u buy?
@@MichaelLujan-cs1kwx2
Bruh you cannot get 240 fps with RTX 4070 in most games lol
Great test, I have 240hz tn and 165hz ips, and honestly, I fail to see a difference, at first I thought I did, for years, but then I recorded some tests myself and these days I got my highest ELO on 165hz ips... on paper 240hz and 1ms is better, but in practice, I failed to ever record more than less 1 frame of difference, and even then it was not 1 full-frame, but partially transition from one to another.
4ms and 1ms feel exactly the same, I can barely notice 165 hz vs 240hz, I can consistently score 150-160 ms reaction time on both, so I'm not too "slow" to notice.
good info bro thank you
100% u have eye problems and go see a doctor. I can see difference between 240hz and 360hz
Yeah, i think there is almost no difference to but monitor with more then 165hz, you will not see or even feel difference
the difference is way too small, only noticeably difference would be 144 to maybe 360. yes even 240 would have a difference but not that noticeable
Nice story brother
240hz isn't faster, its smoother.
Enemy is still on the exact same place as in 60hz, 240hz just makes more between frames.
а никто и не говорит что быстрее
Nope their is delay you can clearly see on the comparison.
@@skullkraken_resurrected9857 it doesn't make sense, there are better videos explaining why higher fps doesn't mean faster, but smoother.
@@skullkraken_resurrected9857 bro are you stupid, shall i explain to you why they are ALWAYS at the same? because on 60 frames wich is lit more then half from 144 (sry think i needed to tell ya since you are not very smart i guess) you have less pictures wich means your charakter moves but your fuckn monitor can only show every 2nd picture and 1 that is missing wich cant be shown duo the low Refreshrate. just because you cant SEE the one step doesent mean your charakter doesnt move, your monitor was lit just to slow to show you the frame. there is no GAME DELAY, it is lit just a DELAY for YOUR Monitor. games run always the same on ANY HZ MONITOR when you play a pvp game wich is always on a fuckn server, the only dif is how much of the movement your monitor is able to print out for you. That is called a Serverside and a Userside. the game server runs the same, it wouldnt make any sense if you see things ''earlyer'' then others when you all play lit on the same game server. If you look at a person walkn on the street and a car drives by so you cant see him anymore doesent mean he stoped movn? so when the car passes by the person is at a diffrent position then before. so just because you havent seen it, does it mean the person has a ''delay''. people are just retarded holy moly, use your brain.
@@dungeonmaster5701 smoother is what I want, make me flichshot more quicker than 75hz
the enemy moves slower with 60hz it means 60hz is the best
its client side so basically only you are seeing that, server side its all the same.
Actually the enemy appears early on higher refresh rates as compared to 60Hz. So 60hz keeps you on disadvantage as you would see the enemy on a delay and react late.
@@irfan_alii
Well said
It’s incredible how “smart” you are. I think then you should set it to 30 hertz and you will dodge bullets like in the matrix...
@@7major664 HAHAHAHA
Just discovered I have been using 60HZ on my monitor for two years instead of max, 160HZ. Will I be godlike now in CS2 after I changed to max? :D
You can't turn from a sucker into a professional by changing your monitor.
And some bots still say there is no difference because the human eye can't see above 60fps, shut you mouth
yeah, because human eye can't actually see more than 24 fps, not even 60 fps
@@adm1ralq you delulu man
@@adm1ralq watch 24fps video and then a 60fps video and you will see the diference
@@adm1ralq Eye doesn't have framerate. It captures light stream at 790THz, so in a way it sees at 790 trillion fps. That's how you look at eye's framerate. Eye doesn't scan retina like cameras scan cmos, it's constantly streaming raw data to your brain. Your brain doesn't have framerate either. Your brain constantly tries to use the least amount of information that is required to understand surroundings, but it doesn't cut it in images per second it analyzes motion and color changes etc. and prioritizes eventa that trigger something interesting. We would have to know how fast your neurons are firing the data from your eyes to your brain. Pennsylvania School of Medicine estimates that eyes send 10 million bits of data per second to your brain, but that doesn't translate to framerate either. US army has conducted test that can in some way be relative to framerate. They flashed images from 100/1 to several thousandth of a second and some of the tested people were able to recognize shown objects even at 1200th of a second flash. Take this information how you like, it's just not possible to think human capability to see as framerate.
@@SamuelPiresN it was a joke!
The human eye can only see trackpad
So 144 is the sweet spot.
??????????????
keep telling you that lmao
i got to supreme on 60hz does this mean im a pro on 240?
Supreme is shit un csgo there are bots in all of elo
Me with a 5000$ gaming pc and 60 hz monitor screen 💀
now there is even 700hz i think getting 240hz is the max i can even see the difference
180hz is the sweet spot
144hz is the best spot,60hz is ass and 240hz is just not worth it
The main thing we want is lower input lag. Which is provided by higher HZ monitors. So yeah, we absolutely want 240 HZ. And even 360 HZ if ever possible.
guys what is this? i dont even see the monitor while playing csgo. my 3rd eyes knows where all my enemy
What is this map?
144hz is the best?
i be on 60hz too lazy to rank up 💀 shouldve been dmg or lem already if the ranks didnt reset with cs 2
my monitor dont even support 240hz so it just seems like 2 144hz vs a 60hz
FPS 240?
so in conclusion 60 hz better since it gives you more time to shoot the enemy (Sarcasm)
So youre saying i can hit them easy with awp at 60hz
but think about the time when you shot hits xd
yeah but just your target should be a little bit front of...
The gamers at the same level , the people has higher HZ monitor has more advantage. I remembered there is a video shows that the ordinary player with higher hz monitor vs game player pro, the ordinary is shotting faster than the pro on the head.
@@robertwu5687 'the gamers are at the same level' absolutely not.
How can I see the 240hz part on a 90hz screen? 😅
Its slow mo
MAP NAME?
144hz is pretty cheap and good
400HZ ?
60 hz isnt this laggy its not like 30 hz
60 nah 144ok 240 great
что за карта?
60hz seems fine to me
60hz is good.. Not bad
Yes
кто делал эту ужасную раскадровку?! моделька должна перемещаться с той же скоростью но чаще! а не с задержкой в 500 мс
540hz moniter is launched enjoy :P
i got the best af monitor but max hz is 75....wow.... that's reason im so bad
Szóval akkor a 60hz jobb
no u ni-
with this monitor no skill required, easy peasy lemon squeezy
A completely ridiculous video. Hz only provides clarity in the streaming image. There's no such thing as a man leaving the wall too early. If the delay times are equal in both images, you will get the same image. When the Hz is high, you will only see the man's output fluently, that's all. These images are completely deceptive. Server ping and screen lag will only allow you to see that guy early. If this Hz value is high, you will see this early. These are just commercial traps.
thats just dumb af, if the guy is 1 pixel from apearing, it will show first with higher refresh rate, while the 60hz is just waiting to tp the guy back when reefresh cycle ends, if you actually played any fps games you would see the diference lol
comercial traps but all pros use, seems about right loooool, even phones now come with 120hz displays, god even tvs, you just another delulu ahh
@@SamuelPiresNBruh, yeah but hz i like:
x Hz: 0+++0+++0+++0+++0
x*2 Hz: 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
So one of frames in higher frequency will be the same as on lower. Object can appear a little earlier on higher frequency but big difference is only at smoothness.
Video is incorrect, 60hZ can't always be behind 144gZ and more, it will and must lineup sometimes.
Fake
@@ВіталікБритан-х7ч you dont understand, our brain works by filling up the gaps with information that it didnt receive, just like frame gen, to make our vision smooth, the more frames you got going into your eyes, the better and faster the prediction is, example, your eyes see an enemy running from cover, the first frames are the most important so our brain can calculate speed and the amount of tracking you need to do, the more frames you have, the more safer assumptions your brain can do, like velocity, position, etc. 60hz will not always be behind 144hz, but 144hz will always be faster, watch this video (ruclips.net/video/Q1cmhZs1P54/видео.html) and try to see if you can predict the movement of the car, try slowing the video even more, or speeding it up, you will see that your brain captures much more information at higher refresh rates, giving you an advantage.
@@ВіталікБритан-х7ч and yes it will lineup "some of the times" but a pro with 144hz that can do "most of the times" has an advantage over you, and that can mean win or lose a 1v1. i was years and years silver and gold in fps games, and the momment i got my 27 inch 165hz monitor i climbed to plat and diamond
170hz
такая разница будет если у тебя 500 фпс . то есть комп за 200к рублей
total bs montage
Киноклоуны в 240гц , как же вы будете играть с теми у кого 500 гц, по вашим понятиям они вас будут видеть на перед ещё до начала раунда😂. КЛОУНЫ ОНИ И В АФРИКЕ КЛОУНЫ😂.
if u thing u are bad player just buy 240hz monitor
You dont need 144hz, is just a marketing thing
pay to win fr
for honor experience
honestly i prefer 60hz
you dont
Ive only ever played on 60hz lol
@@bensslightnature i do ive played 60, 144, 244 and ive gone back to 60 on games that i have low fps on when i play games like csgo or valorant etc i play 144 as i sold 244 didnt see any difference by that could be due to my low reaction time
@@LILPEEPENJOYER what's your rank on these games : valorant and csgo ? I play on 60hz too
@@scorpionners valorant my peek was ascendant csgo is kinda useless cuz global is easy asf to get so highest faceit level is 8 got bored and back in the day ESEA A+ still have it actually