Refutation of Mohammad Yasir Al-Hanafi on Kitab ar-Rooh of Ibn Qayyim vs Fazail Amal
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 май 2022
- Timestaps:
0:00 - Intro
0:20 - Nooniyah Qahatani
0:52 - Contents
1:56 - Stance of Salafi Scholars on Kitab Ar-Rooh
2:10 - Fatwa of Shaikh Ibn Baaz on Kitab Ar-Rooh
3:44 - Fatwa of Shaikh Muqbil on Kitab Ar-Rooh
3:57 - Fatwa of Shaikh Saleh al-Fawzan on Kitab Ar-Rooh
4:23 - He doesn't know or trying to hide the truth?
4:53 - The First Lie - the dead give news of the unseen?
9:02 - The Second Lie - Mohammad Yasir Mocks the Hadith!
13:33 - The Third Lie - Souls have defeated armies!?
16:47 - What does Fadail Amaal Contain? Why do we warn against it?
17:57 - First statement from Fadail Amal which is again Quran & Sunnah!
18:20 - Reading Quran without concentration is equivalent to Bakwas (crap talk).
19:09 - Second statement - Abu Hanifa could see sins falling off!
20:36 - Third statement - Young Man knows the unseen!
23:33 - Kitab ar-Rooh vs Fadail Amaal comparison!
25:13 - Why deobandis openly oppose Quran & Sunnah?
27:45 - Nooniyah Qahatani Outro!
This is a response to: Mohammad Yasir Al-Hanafi's video uploaded to Hanafi Fiqh Channel: Fadha'il A'maal vs Ibn-al Qayyim's Kitaab ar Ruh
@Hanafi Fiqh Channel
@hanafifiqh
Good work brother
Keep it up and do more refutations
May Allah aid you
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
About 20:36, "Kashf has been made to many people
who have heard the voices of those being punished in their graves.
They saw them being punished with their own eyes. These narrations
are many and well-known" Hafiz Ibn Taymiyyah (R.A) Majmoo Al Fatawa Vol 4 page 296. Is this not one and the same thing? . Kindly give the same ruling about him too and prohibit the Majmoo Al Fatawa.
May Allah s.w.t. guide all Muslims.
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey Mohammed haleem js a joker that knows nothing about aqidah he already got destroyed by a medina university student
@@Mohammed-ok2ft not really, you may also call grand mufti of saudi arabia and whole faculty of madina university, not just students and we are ready to debate even in kaaba... You guys knows nothing about aqida... If maulana has been destroyed by madina university students do why can't they come face to face? Just come get some, we the people of deoband are ready to debate everyone, its an open challenge
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey I debated a deobandi student yesterday he studied at darrul uloom in africa and then miftah ul uloom in Blackburn and he has no knowledge he doesn’t know basic aqidah he didn’t even know who abu hassan al ashari was are these your future scholars? Then you deobandis are done out
Whats your opinion about his speech about "imam malik said Allah on arasy". He said that the narrator of this statement is weak.
This exact question is answered here:
ruclips.net/video/vcotsyEwCWk/видео.html
Masha'Allah
AllaahummahBaarik
Assalamu alaikum akhi or sheikh if your a alim of Deen ...I really think your clutching at straws here in your criticism of sheikh Yasir ...firstly your fixated on the heading without mentioning if the content is there or not ...secondly he isn't mocking the hadith ..but speaking passionately about the story ..that's just your point of view ...and he wasn't mocking ibn qayyim ...maybe a bad choice of words but no malicious intent ...anyway your clutching at straws ...story of Abu hanifa and kashf...this is your own ignorance as many stories of miraculous events regarding sahabah
Wa alaykum assalam... but these were not the only criticisms he made. If you feel these are straws, don't focus on them, look at the other points he raised.
Have you read the content of fazaail e aamaal? Where the people are being advised to pray at the grave of someone?
Where the author is saying no on can benefit him except the prophet?
Where knowledge of the unseen, as well as knowledge of what is in the hearts of people, of intentions is attributed, to people.
Where new Sharee'ah is being revealed by the Prophet whether in dreams, or with him coming while people are awake.
May Allaah guide us all to the Straight Path.
The video should mention who the speaker is.
I recently began watching this man’s videos in a critiquing manner and I’m beginning to be astonished by the amount of hatred and enmity he has for the salafiyah and the scholars of salafiya. It does seem that his whole basis in life is to stumble and try desperately to disprove the tenants of salafiya with the weakest of arguments.
Maybe you’re just ill-informed and he’s defensive because the salafiya have managed to make takfeer of the entire ummah except themselves. Do learn about what Hanabila was actually before Sh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab came along. May Allah have mercy on his soul and forgive the massacres he caused.
He massacared people who had mushrikun beleifs and evil practices like the heretical barelwie sect
@@ShezzyyShaikh 👍
May Allah defend you as far as you have defended the Right creed from them
didnt even mention who this speaker is..and takes 7 years to respond??
Assalamu alaikum ya akhi, You’re being unjust. I’m 7:13 min in and I can already see you’re criticising immaturely, not scholarly. “He seems extremely obsessed.”
Sh Yasir is just saying that a whole section is present. Whether the heading is present or not in other copies it doesn’t mean the content under the heading is not there.
I don't think the heading is the only point he made, you are only trying to find something to hold on
@@mawejjesharif2142 Masha Allah this brother has even highlighted your comment. He wants to pin every attention he gets. I haven’t watched the whole thing but when I finish trust me I will find tonnes of mistakes in this video. Besides the one that I have already found.
The owner of the channel needs to review and look in his heart sincerely. Is he really trying to please Allah by making this video or his nafs.
I know these salafis inside out because I was one. Full of themseves. They are ignorant of the fact that Shaikh ibn Jauzi, ibn Quddamah, ibn Taymiyya, ibn ul Qayyim, ibn adh-Dhahabi were all sufis from the Qadiriyya Silsila and had ijazas from other silasil. They claim he stopped being a sufi but his students ibn ul qayyim and others in the chain are proof that he was a sufi till his death. They were the real sufis, not the fake pirs collecting money. They are ignorant of their history of how Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab became the reason for a countless en masse murderous crimes. May Allah forgive the zalimeen of this ummah. I would not make this dua if the Prophet (saws) did not.
The whole basis of their school of thought is ignorant of the fact that Ibn Taymiyya retracted his statements on the Maturidiya and Ashaira near the end of his life yet they still manage to consider them as out of the folds of Ahl us Sunnah. They are just ignorant of anything that any other school has to say because SMIAW brought a methodology to manage to make takfeer of the entire ummah except themselves (source Imam Ash-Shawkani a former supporter of SMIAW). They reject kalam when ibn Taymiyya himself was a mutakallim. They only read books that their mashaa’ikh tell them to and are EXTREMELY ignorant of the fact that MANY Hanbalis condemned ibn Taymiyya (rha) on MANY issues. We still love and admire him even though all scholars can make mistakes. They are ignorant of the fact that ALL OF THE kutub us sittah (i.e. Bukhari, Muslim, Abi Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nisa’i, ibn Majah) and others like Ibn Abi Shayba, Mustadrak were all SAVED and TRANSMITTED by SUFIS. They are ignorant of just everything in general. No nothing about the books of Rijaal. This is why when I see videos like this, I am waiting for a serious video response, but sadly our salafi brothers can only resort to the sad quality of criticism of this video. If anyone still think this guy is a big shot, then you have a wayyyyyyy lot of studying to do. You have so much مطالعة reading many islamic books by various ulema to do. Need to study where your books of ahadith, came from. Who taught them, who transmitted them. This who is so important of where you get your deen from, otherwise you will remain ignorant if you only refer to the Shaikh that injected EXTREMIST opinions and hijacked and forced them upon the Athariya and Hanabila. These guys will leave what the salaf said over what Ibn Abdul Wahhab said. And the funny part is they condemn blind following. Please educate yourself and investigate my claims for your own spiritual betterment.
@@ShezzyyShaikh subhanallah, you have left off the view in place and gone off on a rampage with far-fetched arguments, calling everyone that was known for his uprightness a Sufi. I was even afraid you would end up saying the prophet was a Sufi. You even dragged in Imam abdul-wahhab saying this brother shall take his words without thought, yet, just to strike an example, he finished the whole video not having mentioned the Imam even once
@@ShezzyyShaikh and we are way past the age of listening to people who, as you said, we think are a big shot. We follow proof, and he offered that, it is no way about even knowing him. And brother, you made a lot of wild claims you didn't bring proof for, claiming all the shaikhs were sufis, taking upon yourself an understanding that you are learned and we are not, and hence seeking knowledge from people we think are big shots, you only brought up many names, and anyone can write them, we need sources, proof, solid proof, and then you can boast about your المطالعة later
I feel like laughing at you but I’m afraid that may be an act of kufr on your fatwa end. Ibn Taymiyya tells us his own sufi chain through Shaikh Abdul Qadir Jilani to the Prophet (saws). Imam Dhahabi himself tells us his chain of tasawwuf through ibn Taymiyya to Abdul Qadir Jilani.
Be honest with me, yourself and Allah azwj. How much of Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn ul Qayyim, Adh-Dhahabi, ibn Qudamah have you read?
DO YOU KNOW that these awliya of Allah have even written books on tasawwuf 😂. May Allah guide you.
اللهم بارك
Very good video, this fraud deserves to be exposed. Following his ulema in mocking ahadith, expected from these deviants.
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant... Fazail e amaal also has hadith lol and you guys call it book of ignorance
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey what's the difference between Mawlana, Molvi and Shaykh? I would like to know the ranking system.
@@hamedkakar1411 all are same
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey so why is Abdul Haleem and Usman Mawlanas whereas Yasir is a Shaykh?
These blunders are nothing compared to the major blunders the Salafiyyah of this era have made.
Too many to list..
1 ) Shaikh Albani promoting and instructing the ummah that daeef hadeeth is in the same class as mawdoo ( a clear contradiction of the position of the muhadithoon )
2 ) 3 talaq is 1 .. A clear opposition to the ijmaa of the ummah
3 ) 8 rakaats taravih .
Again , a clear opppsition to the ijmaa of the ummah and the scholars.
Even Ibne Taimiyyah is of the opinion of 20 rakaats .
4 ) Salafis stressing that taqleed is shirk and haram ( a clear opposition to the scholars of the ummah )
5 ) Salafiyya's incorrect claim to following the Salaf Saalih...
6 ) Salafis claiming that daeef hadeeth cannot be used in fazaail..
Opposition to the position of the muhaditheen .many examples .1 will suffice
قال العلماء من المحدثين و الفقهاء و غبديرهم .يجوز و يستحب العمل في الفضاءل و الترغيب و الترهيب بالحديث الضعيف ما لم يكن موضوعا ...
Pg 5 , Kitaabulazkaar ..pdf .
Dfrnt pages dfrnt prints.
7 ) Salafi verdict of impermissibility of making niyyah for visiting Prophet's grave..
This is khilaaf of ijmaa ...
Also ...
Chk volume 14 of Majmooatulfataawa of Ibne Taimiyyah
معلوم ان اهل المذاهب كالحنفية و المالكية و الشافعية و الحنبلية دينهم واحد ومنهم من اطاع الله ورسوله كان مؤمنا سعيدا باتفاق المسلمين ...
Where does Ibne Taimiyyah mention the Ahle Hadeeth or Salafi jamaat ?
Ibne Taimiyyah was a Hanbali just like most of his students..
Following a mazhab is shirk ??
Soooo much more
Shaikh that is the point of Shaikh Yasir Al Hanafi, no book or person is free of errors except Rasoolallah SAW as mentioned by Shaikh Bin Baz RA.
So why only Fadial e Amal only left as deviant book where there are good things and some not favorable things, so left them all.
You should leave the un favorable things and get benefit from good things.
You twisted the whole argument to word by word challenge but not the essence of his whole lectures that we should not reject the bookbas whole but leave something that you think is inappropriate.
Don’t bother with them they find a 1000 excuses for rabee madkhali and are instantly harsh with the Muslims on ikhtilaf
Salafis are lost.. they get on the band wagon of " Taqleed is haraam " when the truth is that they are also doing taqleed...of their scholars .
A challenge to Salafis until Day of Judgement..
Salafis should answer why they do taqleed of Imam Hafs and Imaam Asim in Qiraa'ah ..
Because they claim they take directly from Rasulullah . Salafis doing taqleed of Imam Asim and his student Imam Hafs..