- Видео 3
- Просмотров 23 443
Removing Ignorance
Добавлен 23 апр 2022
Harms of debating the atheists publicly - Saleh bin Abdul-Aziz Al ash-Shaikh
Is it allowed to debate the atheists?
How can we defend our Aqeedah?
Refutation of those who debate atheists publically.
How can we defend our Aqeedah?
Refutation of those who debate atheists publically.
Просмотров: 530
Видео
Refutation of Mohammad Yasir Al-Hanafi on Kitab ar-Rooh of Ibn Qayyim vs Fazail Amal
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.2 года назад
Timestaps: 0:00 - Intro 0:20 - Nooniyah Qahatani 0:52 - Contents 1:56 - Stance of Salafi Scholars on Kitab Ar-Rooh 2:10 - Fatwa of Shaikh Ibn Baaz on Kitab Ar-Rooh 3:44 - Fatwa of Shaikh Muqbil on Kitab Ar-Rooh 3:57 - Fatwa of Shaikh Saleh al-Fawzan on Kitab Ar-Rooh 4:23 - He doesn't know or trying to hide the truth? 4:53 - The First Lie - the dead give news of the unseen? 9:02 - The Second Lie...
Nooniyah Qahatani with English Subs Refuting Asharis
Просмотров 20 тыс.2 года назад
5th Century Scholar Refutes the Ashari's in his 600 lines poetry An-Nooniyah نونية القحطاني - الرد على الأشاعرة
جزاك الله خيرا
Alhamdulillah excellent response Deobandis are well known liars
Salafis are lost.. they get on the band wagon of " Taqleed is haraam " when the truth is that they are also doing taqleed...of their scholars . A challenge to Salafis until Day of Judgement.. Salafis should answer why they do taqleed of Imam Hafs and Imaam Asim in Qiraa'ah .. Because they claim they take directly from Rasulullah . Salafis doing taqleed of Imam Asim and his student Imam Hafs..
These blunders are nothing compared to the major blunders the Salafiyyah of this era have made. Too many to list.. 1 ) Shaikh Albani promoting and instructing the ummah that daeef hadeeth is in the same class as mawdoo ( a clear contradiction of the position of the muhadithoon ) 2 ) 3 talaq is 1 .. A clear opposition to the ijmaa of the ummah 3 ) 8 rakaats taravih . Again , a clear opppsition to the ijmaa of the ummah and the scholars. Even Ibne Taimiyyah is of the opinion of 20 rakaats . 4 ) Salafis stressing that taqleed is shirk and haram ( a clear opposition to the scholars of the ummah ) 5 ) Salafiyya's incorrect claim to following the Salaf Saalih... 6 ) Salafis claiming that daeef hadeeth cannot be used in fazaail.. Opposition to the position of the muhaditheen .many examples .1 will suffice قال العلماء من المحدثين و الفقهاء و غبديرهم .يجوز و يستحب العمل في الفضاءل و الترغيب و الترهيب بالحديث الضعيف ما لم يكن موضوعا ... Pg 5 , Kitaabulazkaar ..pdf . Dfrnt pages dfrnt prints. 7 ) Salafi verdict of impermissibility of making niyyah for visiting Prophet's grave.. This is khilaaf of ijmaa ... Also ... Chk volume 14 of Majmooatulfataawa of Ibne Taimiyyah معلوم ان اهل المذاهب كالحنفية و المالكية و الشافعية و الحنبلية دينهم واحد ومنهم من اطاع الله ورسوله كان مؤمنا سعيدا باتفاق المسلمين ... Where does Ibne Taimiyyah mention the Ahle Hadeeth or Salafi jamaat ? Ibne Taimiyyah was a Hanbali just like most of his students.. Following a mazhab is shirk ?? Soooo much more
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Horrible poem, there is no refutation; also this Qahtani person is Majhul Ayn and doesn’t exist.
Idk how he would actually refute something in a poem
@@Spadegaming321the poem goes on like this for an hour and fourty minutes. It is a wasiyyah and it is a real poem and a real scholar who was seen by El san3ani, as one of the best and most trusted people of his time. Btw he was on the medhab of imam Malik.
The madkhali anthem 😂
The one who write this were born before or after Cheikh madkhali ?
I don’t know brother but I’ll tell you one thing there is no such thing as one group of salafi the madkhalis don’t get along with shaykh muqbil and his group and both the madkhalis and muqbils group do not get along with the extreme khariji salafis. So who are the salafis? Even in aqeeda shaykh bin baz, shaykh uthaymeen and shaykh Al bani differed so all this we are salafi on haq and ashari are not - who are the salafis? Pro madkhalli anti madkhali or kharijis?😂
@@ViralSportsTV397Since you don’t know I will tell you, the author of this poem that you call anthem was born before Cheikh Rabi. So he can’t be “ Madkhali “ as you love claim.
@@ViralSportsTV397 If you say that Albani and Bin Baz and Ibn Uteymeen differ from Aqeedah then i just lost it at the amount of ignorance is filled in your head.
@@ViralSportsTV397 Shaykh Muqbil has gave shaykh Rabee a Tazkiyyah so has the rest of the scholars u listed
Wheres the rest? I wanted to hear the hujjaj
Oh you can look up the full nuniyat El qahtani, Sheikh El san3aniy saw him as one of the best people and most trurthfull at the time. You'll hear that at the start of the nuniyah.
Shaikh that is the point of Shaikh Yasir Al Hanafi, no book or person is free of errors except Rasoolallah SAW as mentioned by Shaikh Bin Baz RA. So why only Fadial e Amal only left as deviant book where there are good things and some not favorable things, so left them all. You should leave the un favorable things and get benefit from good things. You twisted the whole argument to word by word challenge but not the essence of his whole lectures that we should not reject the bookbas whole but leave something that you think is inappropriate.
Don’t bother with them they find a 1000 excuses for rabee madkhali and are instantly harsh with the Muslims on ikhtilaf
Can I post this video on my RUclips? I'm in love with the madhab of ahlul hadeeth and this makes me proud to refute innovators as a salafi
AllaahummahBaarik
Funny fact nooniya means a kids potty in today's levantine Arabic 😂😂😂😂
And you pulled that lie out your??
There is no refutation of Ahlou Assouna El Ash’aris; it has only insults
youre just too uneducated to not know them 😂
He skipped some parts
same i was thinking lol also "claims without evidence" this is really hilarous to someone who has even the drop of water from ilm they want to fool awam with the magic of words as prophet as said
Plus he lost and the Asharis won
@@-Ahmed8592 ashaaris are juhal
The poem also says: لا تحصر الأوهام مبلغ ذاته *** أبدا ولا يحويه قطر مكان Do Salafis support this part as well?
yes
it's just you misunderstood it, whatever, Surely we do, and surely a lot are misunderstanding that part, I am translating this poetry
Yes, you don’t understand our belief
لا يحويه Is important
The man's a bit more sufficticated in nahw than you might think mate.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 population of our kids is more than rhe population of whole pseudo-salafi world... We (Maturidis and Asharis) from deobandi faction are always ready to debate, just come and get some you can't win
Your philosophers are baffled.
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali our philosophers don't worship idol by imagining Allah's body
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey by your logic everyone who is a layman without knowledge who reads the Quran is someone who says Allah has body parts? Fear Allah
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey “our philosophers” keep taking from Aristotle ya akhi
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali lol we follow Quran and sunnah, stop following ibn karram
You didn't refuted clearly, why don't you denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant? Be clear and issue fatwa against him and call him deviant rather than maintaining silence you creepy liars... Come and have a face to face debate... We are people of Quran and sunnah and you guys even have disagreement sahaba you mini rafawidh
didnt even mention who this speaker is..and takes 7 years to respond??
Masha'Allah
About 20:36, "Kashf has been made to many people who have heard the voices of those being punished in their graves. They saw them being punished with their own eyes. These narrations are many and well-known" Hafiz Ibn Taymiyyah (R.A) Majmoo Al Fatawa Vol 4 page 296. Is this not one and the same thing? . Kindly give the same ruling about him too and prohibit the Majmoo Al Fatawa.
May I repost this in sha Allah?
May Allah defend you as far as you have defended the Right creed from them
The video should mention who the speaker is.
Assalamu alaikum akhi or sheikh if your a alim of Deen ...I really think your clutching at straws here in your criticism of sheikh Yasir ...firstly your fixated on the heading without mentioning if the content is there or not ...secondly he isn't mocking the hadith ..but speaking passionately about the story ..that's just your point of view ...and he wasn't mocking ibn qayyim ...maybe a bad choice of words but no malicious intent ...anyway your clutching at straws ...story of Abu hanifa and kashf...this is your own ignorance as many stories of miraculous events regarding sahabah
Wa alaykum assalam... but these were not the only criticisms he made. If you feel these are straws, don't focus on them, look at the other points he raised. Have you read the content of fazaail e aamaal? Where the people are being advised to pray at the grave of someone? Where the author is saying no on can benefit him except the prophet? Where knowledge of the unseen, as well as knowledge of what is in the hearts of people, of intentions is attributed, to people. Where new Sharee'ah is being revealed by the Prophet whether in dreams, or with him coming while people are awake. May Allaah guide us all to the Straight Path.
Assalamu alaikum ya akhi, You’re being unjust. I’m 7:13 min in and I can already see you’re criticising immaturely, not scholarly. “He seems extremely obsessed.” Sh Yasir is just saying that a whole section is present. Whether the heading is present or not in other copies it doesn’t mean the content under the heading is not there.
I don't think the heading is the only point he made, you are only trying to find something to hold on
@@mawejjesharif2142 Masha Allah this brother has even highlighted your comment. He wants to pin every attention he gets. I haven’t watched the whole thing but when I finish trust me I will find tonnes of mistakes in this video. Besides the one that I have already found. The owner of the channel needs to review and look in his heart sincerely. Is he really trying to please Allah by making this video or his nafs. I know these salafis inside out because I was one. Full of themseves. They are ignorant of the fact that Shaikh ibn Jauzi, ibn Quddamah, ibn Taymiyya, ibn ul Qayyim, ibn adh-Dhahabi were all sufis from the Qadiriyya Silsila and had ijazas from other silasil. They claim he stopped being a sufi but his students ibn ul qayyim and others in the chain are proof that he was a sufi till his death. They were the real sufis, not the fake pirs collecting money. They are ignorant of their history of how Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab became the reason for a countless en masse murderous crimes. May Allah forgive the zalimeen of this ummah. I would not make this dua if the Prophet (saws) did not. The whole basis of their school of thought is ignorant of the fact that Ibn Taymiyya retracted his statements on the Maturidiya and Ashaira near the end of his life yet they still manage to consider them as out of the folds of Ahl us Sunnah. They are just ignorant of anything that any other school has to say because SMIAW brought a methodology to manage to make takfeer of the entire ummah except themselves (source Imam Ash-Shawkani a former supporter of SMIAW). They reject kalam when ibn Taymiyya himself was a mutakallim. They only read books that their mashaa’ikh tell them to and are EXTREMELY ignorant of the fact that MANY Hanbalis condemned ibn Taymiyya (rha) on MANY issues. We still love and admire him even though all scholars can make mistakes. They are ignorant of the fact that ALL OF THE kutub us sittah (i.e. Bukhari, Muslim, Abi Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nisa’i, ibn Majah) and others like Ibn Abi Shayba, Mustadrak were all SAVED and TRANSMITTED by SUFIS. They are ignorant of just everything in general. No nothing about the books of Rijaal. This is why when I see videos like this, I am waiting for a serious video response, but sadly our salafi brothers can only resort to the sad quality of criticism of this video. If anyone still think this guy is a big shot, then you have a wayyyyyyy lot of studying to do. You have so much مطالعة reading many islamic books by various ulema to do. Need to study where your books of ahadith, came from. Who taught them, who transmitted them. This who is so important of where you get your deen from, otherwise you will remain ignorant if you only refer to the Shaikh that injected EXTREMIST opinions and hijacked and forced them upon the Athariya and Hanabila. These guys will leave what the salaf said over what Ibn Abdul Wahhab said. And the funny part is they condemn blind following. Please educate yourself and investigate my claims for your own spiritual betterment.
@@ShezzyyShaikh subhanallah, you have left off the view in place and gone off on a rampage with far-fetched arguments, calling everyone that was known for his uprightness a Sufi. I was even afraid you would end up saying the prophet was a Sufi. You even dragged in Imam abdul-wahhab saying this brother shall take his words without thought, yet, just to strike an example, he finished the whole video not having mentioned the Imam even once
@@ShezzyyShaikh and we are way past the age of listening to people who, as you said, we think are a big shot. We follow proof, and he offered that, it is no way about even knowing him. And brother, you made a lot of wild claims you didn't bring proof for, claiming all the shaikhs were sufis, taking upon yourself an understanding that you are learned and we are not, and hence seeking knowledge from people we think are big shots, you only brought up many names, and anyone can write them, we need sources, proof, solid proof, and then you can boast about your المطالعة later
I feel like laughing at you but I’m afraid that may be an act of kufr on your fatwa end. Ibn Taymiyya tells us his own sufi chain through Shaikh Abdul Qadir Jilani to the Prophet (saws). Imam Dhahabi himself tells us his chain of tasawwuf through ibn Taymiyya to Abdul Qadir Jilani. Be honest with me, yourself and Allah azwj. How much of Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn ul Qayyim, Adh-Dhahabi, ibn Qudamah have you read? DO YOU KNOW that these awliya of Allah have even written books on tasawwuf 😂. May Allah guide you.
Who is the reciter?
I believe Fares abbad
Fares Abbad
How pathetic! Whatever happened to..."Akhi.. Only Qur'an and Sunnah!"?? You've become sooo desperate that you need to resort to poetry to try and prove your false Aqeeda!
Asharis always on top cope ya wahabi ya Ahlul bidah
His Anas. I agree, this is guy is filthy wahhabi zindiq May God curse him. All they can do is make poems against us. They can’t defend their kufri tajsim aqīdah.
Ayy based
We are Ahlul bidah? Don’t you celebrate mawlid?
@@randomspeler9658 Yes, many scholars permit it. Such as Ibn hajar.
@@muhammady1356 let’s debate.
May Allah s.w.t. guide all Muslims.
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey Mohammed haleem js a joker that knows nothing about aqidah he already got destroyed by a medina university student
@@Mohammed-ok2ft not really, you may also call grand mufti of saudi arabia and whole faculty of madina university, not just students and we are ready to debate even in kaaba... You guys knows nothing about aqida... If maulana has been destroyed by madina university students do why can't they come face to face? Just come get some, we the people of deoband are ready to debate everyone, its an open challenge
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey I debated a deobandi student yesterday he studied at darrul uloom in africa and then miftah ul uloom in Blackburn and he has no knowledge he doesn’t know basic aqidah he didn’t even know who abu hassan al ashari was are these your future scholars? Then you deobandis are done out
Salafis are frauds.
I recently began watching this man’s videos in a critiquing manner and I’m beginning to be astonished by the amount of hatred and enmity he has for the salafiyah and the scholars of salafiya. It does seem that his whole basis in life is to stumble and try desperately to disprove the tenants of salafiya with the weakest of arguments.
Maybe you’re just ill-informed and he’s defensive because the salafiya have managed to make takfeer of the entire ummah except themselves. Do learn about what Hanabila was actually before Sh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab came along. May Allah have mercy on his soul and forgive the massacres he caused.
He massacared people who had mushrikun beleifs and evil practices like the heretical barelwie sect
@@ShezzyyShaikh 👍
Whats your opinion about his speech about "imam malik said Allah on arasy". He said that the narrator of this statement is weak.
This exact question is answered here: ruclips.net/video/vcotsyEwCWk/видео.html
Deowbandi ignorance is unbelievable
MASHALLAH WE WILL REMOVE ALL OF THE KUFARS
some parts were skipped if im not wrong
Mashallah akhi, Translate the part about women if you can. Jazak Allah khair.
Watch al islam productions
اللهم بارك Very good video, this fraud deserves to be exposed. Following his ulema in mocking ahadith, expected from these deviants.
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant... Fazail e amaal also has hadith lol and you guys call it book of ignorance
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey what's the difference between Mawlana, Molvi and Shaykh? I would like to know the ranking system.
@@hamedkakar1411 all are same
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey so why is Abdul Haleem and Usman Mawlanas whereas Yasir is a Shaykh?
Good work brother Keep it up and do more refutations May Allah aid you
He didn't refuted clearly, he should denounce ibn qayyim and issue fatwa against ibn qayyim and call him mubtadi or deviant
He should come and have debate with maulana usman, maulana abdul haleem and sheikh yasir... We have original copy of kitab ur rooh, you have Saudi edition, and takhreej saudi edition is not trusted... Your ibn qayyim said ibn taymiyyah read from luh al mahfuz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Is this a different nooniyah then the one by IBN qayim
Yes, Ibn Qayyim was inspired by this one.
Na'am. This is almost 200 yrs before Ibnu Qayyim.
Subahanallah
Masha Allah
جميل وفقكم الله