It was a very long time, but I just wanted to fully empathize with it. That's pretty successful. Thank you for this video. J.C. Moes. (67) Lelystad, the Netherlands.
This must have been quite a ride back then I still ask myself why all of those people had to die because since 9-11 it doesn't seem like we have a lot of freedom left anymore.
Because people forgot a few, basic things I never though any adult would forget: No government or any corporation will EVER be your friend; "They" are *NOT* all the same; Your vote really DOES count even when it is just a choice of the lessor of two evils; and, Without a free press we will lose EVERYTHING.
My Cousin Has The Game Il2 Sturmovik 1946 And Has Flown P 40 Warhawk B 25 Messershcmitt Me 262 And Messershcmitt Bf 109 E9 And Am6 21 Mithsubishi Zero In Attack On Pearl Harbor
The Ki-83 Oscar could dance, but like the Zero, can't take a hit and with only two .50 cals, could not dish it out. Japan was hopeless out gunned, out muscled, out-classed.
*Ki-43 Hayabusa/"Oscar" ;) And that crate could dance even better than the contemporary A6M Zero, the rate of roll was superb, especially at higher speeds compared to the Zeke. The rate of climb was also quite a bit to much better, depending on the exact variant(the Japanese were a bit... weird, for lack of a better word, when it came to how many armament variants a single engine/frame combination could have). The perks of being a land based fighter carrying around less fuel, especially in the wings. There were 2 test models of the Ki-43-III armed with twin 20mm cannons in the cowling in late 1944, which also used the same engine as the Ki-100 did. Those were extremely promising in terms of low-mid altitude performance with exceptional rate of climb, agility and even respectable straightline speed... but at that point superb low-mid altitude performance wasn't what was asked for anymore... high altitude speed and firepower was, to combat the B-29 formations. Japan didn't lack excellent fighter or bomber designs... the Ki-84 Hayate/"Frank" for example was a match for anything the Allies had, with the exception of the B-29's(by virtue of their very high service altitude and speed at that altitude) and the next generation of allied piston and jet fighters like the F8F, F7F, P-51H, P-80 for the US and the later Mark's of the Griffon Spitfire as well as the Gloster Meteor and De Havilland Vampire for the UK. What they lacked in the aviation department were ressources, especially rare metals, the ability to refine crude oil into avgas... and of course industrial capacity in general, and an efficient system to train replacement pilots, and an Army and Navy that actually worked together or even talked to each other, instead of competing for every little thing and using their own designs for planes, weapons et cetera... hell, the Army even had it's own *transport ships* for crying out loud! Oh, and luck... they certainly lacked that, too. If a certain earthquake on the 7th December(how's that for Karma?) 1944 hadn't mostly destroyed the Mitsubishi plant in the Nagoya region which was then completely flattened by bombing raids on 11th of March 1945, leading to the total loss of the full scale drawings and production jigs, early 1945 could have seen the introduction of the A7M Reppu/"Sam", the true successor of the Zero and superior in most respects(and in some vastly so) to the F6F-5 Hellcat. Another plane design died as well with that plant, the Ki-83, a twin engined high altitude bomber killer with monstrous performance.
PC: If it's an office computer of the last 5 years, or anything more powerful than that of the last 10 years, you're almost certainly overequipped for most scenarios in this game. Some missions are highly-intensive, there's not much that can be done for that except having an unrealistically powerful cpu. Stick: Anything cheap you can find and that you trust to keep itself centered for a good, long time. T16000 isn't a bad starting point. Consider head tracking too, TrackHat, ARUCO etc.
if I have the history right Rabaul was an example of how distance took the P40 out of the fight in the Pacific theatre. I think it was kept around though if the Japanese did not blast them on the airfields.
Anyone know what variant those P47’s are?-I know they’re early models b/c of the canopy’s design, but that’s about as far as I can get w/ identification. Appreciate any insights! *awesome video b/t/w-love that this has timestamps, too*
I always have bookmarks in the video descriptions, that tell a viewer what happens when. You posting these comments is not necessary and honestly pretty stupid.
I don't have a clue what you are talking about, you need to be way more specific. Since I usually have bomber formations in my missions, I talk a lot about them. Here you go: 4.10 - 4.12 Formation issues video: ruclips.net/video/oB1X2FV2vv8/видео.html 4.13+ Formation issues video: ruclips.net/video/v6ruK7cJKu4/видео.html SAS post on the topic: www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,52182.msg568113.html#msg568113
Answering a little late here, sorry. Those look like Ki-43-II, because of several external differences to the Ki-43-I: - no protruding telescope sight through the cockpit front which means a reflex gunsight, - shorter wingspan, - three bladed propeller with large prop spinner, - longer engine and engine cowling with supercharger air inlet between the machinegun firing ports, - said firing ports protruding above the cowling which suggests 2x 12.7mm Ho-103 machineguns as armament Which subvariant of the Ki-43-II this is isn't discernable however since they mainly differed in things that aren't visible externally... armor protection, radio equipment, fuel capacity and the possible external ordnance. They all had self-sealing fuel tanks however.
Well, there is a map of japan, so i technically could attack tokyo. The thing is, that real Tokyo missions were flown from the marianas, i.e. Saipan, Guam and Tinian. These islands are 2400km away from tokyo, a mission flown at 500 km/h still takes about 10 hours :D
Was laying down watching this not expecting to watch the whole thing but now I am 2 hours in
Thank you for watching, much appreciated :)
@@Fishyyy ::
I see you brought all the cylinders back this time. Crew Chief will be happy.
It was a very long time, but I just wanted to fully empathize with it.
That's pretty successful. Thank you for this video.
J.C. Moes. (67) Lelystad, the Netherlands.
I watched the whole video, without blinking
Nice little Memphis Belle inspired intro. It was the first war movie I watched when I was 4, and it's what made me fall in love with aviation.
Love hearing the music in the background. Good job!
This is absolutely epic! Especially for an AI pilot!
2:18:31 Zero rams B-24
Pilot was already dead when the plane hit...
Hopefully, this was played with the "20 years old, Cold, and Scared of Death" Mod, for additional realism.
Hi, I'm happy to see that you used my skins I made for B-24D in this video :) Good work! All the best, 200th_Taro
Thanks for making them :)
My pleasure. :) More skins are in progress (currently for B-29). Thanks for making these videos, Keep it up! Cheers!
Good job mate!
@@Fishyyy
ซ
This video was really good. I like full missions, adds realism.
These are so good! Thanks for posting these.
This is the plane who killed most of Louise zamparinis friend (correct if im wrong)
This must have been quite a ride back then I still ask myself why all of those people had to die because since 9-11 it doesn't seem like we have a lot of freedom left anymore.
Because people forgot a few, basic things I never though any adult would forget: No government or any corporation will EVER be your friend; "They" are *NOT* all the same; Your vote really DOES count even when it is just a choice of the lessor of two evils; and, Without a free press we will lose EVERYTHING.
And Has Also Flown The Hawker Hurricane
Could a B 24 keep up with the group on only 3 engines? I'm guessing it could with no bomb load.
Michael Barker yes as long as they could get the prop feathered.
Y7 Y7 nữ
Great work.
hanghaeja I
hangha
It would be interesting to see a guide on navigation...
Haloo.Good work boys.
to hell and back ... where is the hell ? hollydays for the pilots...
Thank you.
Soo good i like it
My got.Jup fighters!
Is the "New Britain, New Guinea June 1944" terrain contained within one of the mentioned add-on / mods?
good vid you just got a new sub and i als smashed the bell too!
omg i never have been hearted before thank you so much i feel like im famous
My Cousin Has The Game Il2 Sturmovik 1946 And Has Flown P 40 Warhawk B 25 Messershcmitt Me 262 And Messershcmitt Bf 109 E9 And Am6 21 Mithsubishi Zero In Attack On Pearl Harbor
The Ki-83 Oscar could dance, but like the Zero, can't take a hit and with only two .50 cals, could not dish it out. Japan was hopeless out gunned, out muscled, out-classed.
*Ki-43 Hayabusa/"Oscar" ;)
And that crate could dance even better than the contemporary A6M Zero, the rate of roll was superb, especially at higher speeds compared to the Zeke. The rate of climb was also quite a bit to much better, depending on the exact variant(the Japanese were a bit... weird, for lack of a better word, when it came to how many armament variants a single engine/frame combination could have). The perks of being a land based fighter carrying around less fuel, especially in the wings.
There were 2 test models of the Ki-43-III armed with twin 20mm cannons in the cowling in late 1944, which also used the same engine as the Ki-100 did. Those were extremely promising in terms of low-mid altitude performance with exceptional rate of climb, agility and even respectable straightline speed... but at that point superb low-mid altitude performance wasn't what was asked for anymore... high altitude speed and firepower was, to combat the B-29 formations.
Japan didn't lack excellent fighter or bomber designs... the Ki-84 Hayate/"Frank" for example was a match for anything the Allies had, with the exception of the B-29's(by virtue of their very high service altitude and speed at that altitude) and the next generation of allied piston and jet fighters like the F8F, F7F, P-51H, P-80 for the US and the later Mark's of the Griffon Spitfire as well as the Gloster Meteor and De Havilland Vampire for the UK.
What they lacked in the aviation department were ressources, especially rare metals, the ability to refine crude oil into avgas... and of course industrial capacity in general, and an efficient system to train replacement pilots, and an Army and Navy that actually worked together or even talked to each other, instead of competing for every little thing and using their own designs for planes, weapons et cetera... hell, the Army even had it's own *transport ships* for crying out loud!
Oh, and luck... they certainly lacked that, too. If a certain earthquake on the 7th December(how's that for Karma?) 1944 hadn't mostly destroyed the Mitsubishi plant in the Nagoya region which was then completely flattened by bombing raids on 11th of March 1945, leading to the total loss of the full scale drawings and production jigs, early 1945 could have seen the introduction of the A7M Reppu/"Sam", the true successor of the Zero and superior in most respects(and in some vastly so) to the F6F-5 Hellcat. Another plane design died as well with that plant, the Ki-83, a twin engined high altitude bomber killer with monstrous performance.
Wooooooooooooo
Hello. As an old combat flight SIM player can you tell me what you consider a good basic desktop computer and joystick setup for this game? Thanks.
PC: If it's an office computer of the last 5 years, or anything more powerful than that of the last 10 years, you're almost certainly overequipped for most scenarios in this game. Some missions are highly-intensive, there's not much that can be done for that except having an unrealistically powerful cpu.
Stick: Anything cheap you can find and that you trust to keep itself centered for a good, long time. T16000 isn't a bad starting point. Consider head tracking too, TrackHat, ARUCO etc.
Yes
Have you played IL-2 Cliffs Of Dover? It's very good.
Yes, i did, a little bit at least.
Atention!Jup bandits!
if I have the history right Rabaul was an example of how distance took the P40 out of the fight in the Pacific theatre. I think it was kept around though if the Japanese did not blast them on the airfields.
Anyone know what variant those P47’s are?-I know they’re early models b/c of the canopy’s design, but that’s about as far as I can get w/ identification.
Appreciate any insights!
*awesome video b/t/w-love that this has timestamps, too*
Thank you :) Those are P-47 D-10s
Fishyyy thanks, brother 👍🏼
Sawaze
Stirnlappenbasilisk
Fishy I love your videos but please tell me how I can get this game Xbox iOS plz
You can't, it's a PC only game.
Oh ok thanks
1:44:20 - "Bombs Away!"
I always have bookmarks in the video descriptions, that tell a viewer what happens when. You posting these comments is not necessary and honestly pretty stupid.
goods news tiems os skys bahts paisal kounmoung
Hey Fishyyy, what was thing you were talking about related to bomber formations?
I don't have a clue what you are talking about, you need to be way more specific. Since I usually have bomber formations in my missions, I talk a lot about them.
Here you go:
4.10 - 4.12 Formation issues video:
ruclips.net/video/oB1X2FV2vv8/видео.html
4.13+ Formation issues video:
ruclips.net/video/v6ruK7cJKu4/видео.html
SAS post on the topic:
www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,52182.msg568113.html#msg568113
VERY INTRESTING!
Can u get this video on iOS
It’s looks like a 2015 or 2014 game
Not bad for a 2001 game. 46 is the last official version. The B-24D was added in 2018 (oops. 2015).
Are you from germany?
yeah
It is in online
A Liberator with a belly ball turret?
It was introduced in that block number (B-24D-140-CO).
And now, it's better, sorry!
JCM, Lelystad Netherlands.
👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣
Which ki43 did u use
Answering a little late here, sorry. Those look like Ki-43-II, because of several external differences to the Ki-43-I:
- no protruding telescope sight through the cockpit front which means a reflex gunsight,
- shorter wingspan,
- three bladed propeller with large prop spinner,
- longer engine and engine cowling with supercharger air inlet between the machinegun firing ports,
- said firing ports protruding above the cowling which suggests 2x 12.7mm Ho-103 machineguns as armament
Which subvariant of the Ki-43-II this is isn't discernable however since they mainly differed in things that aren't visible externally... armor protection, radio equipment, fuel capacity and the possible external ordnance. They all had self-sealing fuel tanks however.
Tokyo, please...
Well, there is a map of japan, so i technically could attack tokyo. The thing is, that real Tokyo missions were flown from the marianas, i.e. Saipan, Guam and Tinian. These islands are 2400km away from tokyo, a mission flown at 500 km/h still takes about 10 hours :D
That was like watching paint dry.
Obviously aerial combat videos are not your thing.
Has to be, those missions were 5 hrs plus. Most of it was hours of boredom and freezing mixed with moments of sheer terror.
The music was amusing ... then it got *really* annoying.
Voice over, ore crew communication, is in negatife volume, pitty.
JCM, Lelystad.
the stupid AI... poor nipon pilots...
first
Team Digital-Rocket League No one cares