The core concepts are the same concepts of Gamification. People are nervous about the word gamification, but this is in fact the same theory. Glad to see others getting on board!
Gamification is one piece of the puzzle, and a good one. His ideas are closely related to those of William Glasser's "Choice Theory", which states that, after the motivation to have physiological survival, people are motivated by 4 things: Social Connectedness, Power/Skill (Mastery), Freedom (Autonomy), and Fun. I also see some connection to "Flow States" where Gamification helps to get people into that target zone where they are challenged enough to be engaged, but not so challenged that they feel overwhelmed.
The problem is not technology, it is more likely to be company culture that is not working well. No core values, no purpose, managers that don't relate well to their employees. People who are in the right jobs don't need motivating.
You misunderstand his use of "technology" in this context. He's using the term as a "artificial, man-made process". From my perspective, as a Leadership Studies major, what he's proposing is replacing the "Management Technology" with the "Leadership Technology". You are right that it is about culture, and Leadership is, in part, about creating and/or changing culture. Where you're not so correct is in the idea that it's just about what Leadership studies calls "organizational fit". Essentially, you're engaging in a variant of the "some people" excuse: "Some people won't work well in an organization with the kind of culture he's describing". But, his ideas are well-grounded in social psychology. Everyone wants Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose. What Leadership Technology does is changes the company culture to be centered around those values.
Engagement is so critical not only the work place, but schools, classrooms, families, relationships, life!
Dan Pink is one of my all time favorites. His TEDtalk on “The Puzzle of Motivation” is awesome!
Great insights into what management actually is and how it's about getting compliance not engagment
The core concepts are the same concepts of Gamification. People are nervous about the word gamification, but this is in fact the same theory. Glad to see others getting on board!
Gamification is one piece of the puzzle, and a good one. His ideas are closely related to those of William Glasser's "Choice Theory", which states that, after the motivation to have physiological survival, people are motivated by 4 things: Social Connectedness, Power/Skill (Mastery), Freedom (Autonomy), and Fun. I also see some connection to "Flow States" where Gamification helps to get people into that target zone where they are challenged enough to be engaged, but not so challenged that they feel overwhelmed.
Thank you. I love your work and reference it regularly in my talks and coaching sessions. Mel Tomlinson
The problem is not technology, it is more likely to be company culture that is not working well. No core values, no purpose, managers that don't relate well to their employees. People who are in the right jobs don't need motivating.
You misunderstand his use of "technology" in this context. He's using the term as a "artificial, man-made process". From my perspective, as a Leadership Studies major, what he's proposing is replacing the "Management Technology" with the "Leadership Technology". You are right that it is about culture, and Leadership is, in part, about creating and/or changing culture. Where you're not so correct is in the idea that it's just about what Leadership studies calls "organizational fit". Essentially, you're engaging in a variant of the "some people" excuse: "Some people won't work well in an organization with the kind of culture he's describing". But, his ideas are well-grounded in social psychology. Everyone wants Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose. What Leadership Technology does is changes the company culture to be centered around those values.
I wonder if Dan Pink talking so much about Atlassian's "Fedex Days" is what alerted Fedex to the use of their name there?
I wonder why did they care. It was sort of free marketing for them...
thanksssssssssssssssssssssssssss
You’re the zeros that think they’re heros
every employee should engage in management
Nimal Malavisuriya its company’s responsibilities to engage them