Awesome video, thanks for review. Where did you have your bindings mounted? From the video looks like progressive line, 1.5cm front from recommended, but I cant tell for sure. Did you like the mounting position? I bought candide 2.0 after your review and loved it. Now looking for powder and park skis.
I’m torn between these and the candide 3.0. I ski mostly off piste, I’m only on piste if I’m skiing with people that don’t like off piste. I don’t go to park at all but I’d like to do some tricks on the features on the mountain. What do you guys recommend?
Hey, so I own the CT 3.0 and love it. But gotta admit. IT IS DEMANDING. It is stiffer and always requires a lot of energy and precision. I still love it but I would say keep that in mind. Other than that just go ahead and choose one. A good skier will work with everything and they are both great skis!
@@lucaslvu The 20/21. The navi Blue one. It always requires some speed and wants more of it. For example towards the end of the days while you are making you're way down and the slopes are a little bumpy and cut up. You can't just surf down relaxed. The Ski doesn't want that 😂 But I think if you like the Candide way of riding you should get it.
@@privatsergej damn, I wonder how the 22 is gonna be since they are making them lighter again. I'd like to be able to surf down in cruise mode from time to time!
Hey Rob, Curated ski expert Charlotte here! The Bent Chetlers will ski more traditionally and you will be able to drive through the tips of the skis more so than the Prodigys. Their waist widths are similar, where the Bents are 100mm underfoot (great for all-mountain and can handle groomers, bumps, trees, plus pow!) and the Prodigy 3.0s are 106mm (borderline all-mountain, but a bit more powder oriented). I would think mainly about your ski style and weight distribution when you head downhill, as well as how much fluffy snow you'll be seeing day-to-day. I'd love to help you weed through your options and find the perfect match for you! Send me a message at www.curated.com/experts/charlotte.h and we can chat from there!
@@wannabecrow9848 Yeah sure you could ski a 106 on the east coast hard pack but why would you want to especially when there are thinner versions of the same ski
@@TwoSliceProductions because modern ski technology allows skiers to have the same amount of edge control and effective edge on tapered, wide skis as fully cambered piste skis nowadays?
Make sure to SUBSCRIBE or click the link below to stay up to date on all of our ski reviews!
bit.ly/curatedyoutube
Awesome video, thanks for review. Where did you have your bindings mounted? From the video looks like progressive line, 1.5cm front from recommended, but I cant tell for sure. Did you like the mounting position? I bought candide 2.0 after your review and loved it. Now looking for powder and park skis.
I just bought the prodigy 3.0s so excited to try them out!
Have you had good skis?
Where should I mount these? I've heard that the recommended mounting points are too far back.
Love m’y factions ❤❤❤❤
I’m torn between these and the candide 3.0. I ski mostly off piste, I’m only on piste if I’m skiing with people that don’t like off piste. I don’t go to park at all but I’d like to do some tricks on the features on the mountain. What do you guys recommend?
Same question here.
Hey, so I own the CT 3.0 and love it. But gotta admit. IT IS DEMANDING. It is stiffer and always requires a lot of energy and precision. I still love it but I would say keep that in mind. Other than that just go ahead and choose one. A good skier will work with everything and they are both great skis!
@@privatsergej hey which year candide 3.0s do you have? Demanding in what way?
Thanks so much for reaponse
@@lucaslvu The 20/21. The navi Blue one. It always requires some speed and wants more of it. For example towards the end of the days while you are making you're way down and the slopes are a little bumpy and cut up. You can't just surf down relaxed. The Ski doesn't want that 😂 But I think if you like the Candide way of riding you should get it.
@@privatsergej damn, I wonder how the 22 is gonna be since they are making them lighter again. I'd like to be able to surf down in cruise mode from time to time!
Super 👍 merci
How would you compare these to the atomic bent chetler 100?
Hey Rob, Curated ski expert Charlotte here! The Bent Chetlers will ski more traditionally and you will be able to drive through the tips of the skis more so than the Prodigys. Their waist widths are similar, where the Bents are 100mm underfoot (great for all-mountain and can handle groomers, bumps, trees, plus pow!) and the Prodigy 3.0s are 106mm (borderline all-mountain, but a bit more powder oriented). I would think mainly about your ski style and weight distribution when you head downhill, as well as how much fluffy snow you'll be seeing day-to-day. I'd love to help you weed through your options and find the perfect match for you! Send me a message at www.curated.com/experts/charlotte.h and we can chat from there!
Great Ski! But they have no Rocker in the Tail... just saying.
Are you sure?
If you can’t ski 106 on east coast hard pack you’re probably terrible at skiing
Lmao candide doesn’t even ski these either 😭😭😭
@@wannabecrow9848 Yeah sure you could ski a 106 on the east coast hard pack but why would you want to especially when there are thinner versions of the same ski
@@TwoSliceProductions because modern ski technology allows skiers to have the same amount of edge control and effective edge on tapered, wide skis as fully cambered piste skis nowadays?
I have these and will find out in couple weeks at snowshoe wv
@@wannabecrow9848 candide chooses his pro models of course. he’s mostly skiing the CT 3.0 and 5.0