@@almir4768 he's been doing this segment for a long time now, and even had a pre-cursor to it (Fuckery Friday). And that's not even close to all he posts. We need more Laynes out there debunking bad info and calling out the people who pass it.
Classic Layne! Love it! I am a huge fan and have been in the "fitness" industry for nearly 20 years and hated the way it had gone and lost hope for the people who actually know what they are talking about. Enter Layne!! Keep it coming. We need you!
Keeping the mistakes in here make this one of the best videos I've seen from you. It makes you look more human, which makes you more trustworthy. Not that I didn't already trust you more than DA, but some hubris helped bring you to our level. Keep having fun with videos in this fashion.
I'm blown away by how few subscribers you still have. Your content is the best blend of intelligence, common sense, and humor. Fine by me, I remember seeing Lamb of God when they only had 2 albums out, now they are one of the biggest bands in metal. Give it time!
Dude great video Layne! The humor was definitely Next Level and I love the way you guys have been doing the videos lately. Such important information and it does fascinate me that people still want to idealize certain foods. Now obviously there's huge benefits to eating whole foods and higher protein because it's just more satiating, more nutrient dense, and will help you reach your goals faster. But you're absolutely right that some of the benefits are over blown like this situation that you're talking about. Thanks for the content and all the best!
I do like using TEF to my advantage though, by eating very lean proteins like shrimp, white fish, egg whites. Eating 400 calories of pure protein, you might just absorb 300 calories worth. Pretty damn cool especially on a cut.
Thanks for another one of your AMAZING videos, I cannot say how valuable and insightful your content has always been! And the new editing is great!! If it is ok, could I ask how you calculated the Net after TEF per macro group? I am only aware of the generic TEF calculation formula, and would be interested to learn.
I love that you dont get scared of swearing in your videos. It makes you seem more real. Just the right level of informal speech. I am enjoying your channel. I like that you also have good educational credentials.
@@scorlanvoone Intolerable. Thankfully, you can put butter in your coffee to avoid getting fat, because it does not spike insulin. That's science. Or something...
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 Impossible and nutrition don't mix well usually. More than that, impossible and biology don't mix well usually. I'm not going to argue. You're assuming the satiety mechanism is fail safe, research points otherwise. You're assuming a lot of things actually, referring to it as a single mechanism when it's a complex psychobiological system. Even just anecdotally, it's not uncommon that people report continuing to binge far after their physically feel full. Oh, yeah, I suppose it's the carbs fault (and I'm being sarcastic)...anyway, as long as your diet works for you, I'm happy. Stay healthy and happy!
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 I perceived you said the exact opposite: that the satiety systems would necessarily stop healthy people from overeating on butter in a low carb diet model. I am contending that as it is all but fail safe, and as such is not a guarantee people following the diet you mention will indeed stop before reaching a notable caloric surplus. In simpler words: low carb/keto diets are not magic insofar as they would prevent you from getting into a caloric surplus. And neither will they prevent you from accruing fat in said situation.
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 if you say so. Again, using extremes such as "impossible, never, always" etc. is something I try to avoid as much as possible as a biologist. "Too full" doesn't mean anything. Ask anyone who's been on a binge. I'll concede that you can retort "how often do you hear about low carb/keto binges?" and anecdotally I'll have to give this one to you for the sake of integrity. But to be frank, while I thank you for your responses, I'm not interested in discussing low carb/keto diets any further when I feel they are painted as that magic trick that will somehow hack your system into perfect intuitive nutrition. My overall analysis of the nutrition literature as a biochem/cell bio PhD and former clinician has been telling me otherwise for a decent time now (I'm not making an argument of authority here, however I do claim with confidence that I am better equipped to analyze and contextualize a corpus of research than the regular person who thinks they nailed it because they read an abstract from a study that seems to go their way). Again, in the end, what matters is that you find the diet model that works for you and your lifestyle. But none will work for everyone all the time. And in this I did speak in absolute, but I'm confident enough about this statement to do so :-)
@@biolayne1 You were comparing a slab of meat to a little lollipop. You should compare it weight for weight. Even if the meat contains fat, a 100g meat will still have much higher tef than a 100g sugar. I noticed you always do this when your subject is about calories.
Hi Layne, thanks for all the informative and entertaining videos. I am a MD trained in Germany, lifting weights for over 40 years (I know, I am old!) and have followed the industry since I started lifting weights in my teens. I am always a bit confused about some of the conventions. When I went to Med School I was taught that carbs have 4.1- 4.2 Kcal/g and fats have about 9.3 Kcal/g. As for protein: it has 5.3 Kcal/g with a net 4.2 Kcal/g AFTER TEF according to my recollection. Could you please clarify 1. The use of 4, 4, 9 Kcal for the macros (is it just because it is easier?) 2. Is the subtraction of the TEF for protein from 5.3 Kcal or from 4.1 (4.2)? Thanks!
Saw a podcast (w/ Max Lugavere iirc) with him the other day where he said that "Kale is as bad as smoking", while being really silly and not particularly respectful. And he repeated that multiple times in different ways, it wasn't just something he didn't mean. In another podcast (w/ Paul Chek) he said that it's absolutely not true that many biohackers are abusing supplements for shortcuts and avoid doing the basics. I think I'll cut down from 2 podcasts/year with Dave to something closer to none. Love the biohacking stuff, experimentation, biochemistry, some weird stuff, higher fat diets and playing around with supplements, but there are certainly better resources out there. Marketing behind the brand is still fucking nuts.
And most people are going to have a hard time eating 45% protein, especially if they are eating close to maintenance. If you're getting 200 grams of protein (which is a solid amount for most people) that's only 32% of a 2,500 calorie diet. Realistically, you're going to fill out the calories with carbs and/or fats. And if you want to lose weight ... just cut some of the fats and carbs rather than try to generate a small deficit by wasting money buying extra meat just for it to be converted inefficiently into energy.
120 cals would be ~1lb month weight loss/gain depending on which way you go. Agreed, not the cure to the epidemic but definitely a powerful tool to add into the equation. Very simple switch tripling protein that should be sustainable. Triple protein and cut fat would be an even greater tool. Thanks, Layne.
hi, is it normal and possible that while I'm on caloric deficite I gain 1 kg after 1 week of start taking creatine? but my waist mesurments goes down 1 cm
I live in your area and I have been following you on IG for awhile. I found you originally through Crunch on IG and I totally want to be your friend. Your knowledge is great and you just seem like a funny cynic like I am.
Question, wouldn't it be more wise not to have such a high fat percentage of calories exchange them for more carbs or protein? Not saying eat 0 fat, that's almost impossible, and yes I know we need "healthy" fat in our body to keep things running. Why not 15% fat daily?
The high protein diet example you used looks more like a keto diet- any High protein diet I’ve done has been 45g fat and the remaining balance would be carbs - which would mean more than a 120 calorie difference: that’s a lot for women! I don’t agree with everything Dave says but I see his point here
Calories are not stupid, you are stupid when you don't know how to use them. Eating less 120 kCal a day for 6 months means you've got 6lbs less fat 120 kCal for a 2000 diet is a lot btw
I like the vid quality and the info being typed on the screen was crisp and clear, not that I don't love your your whiteboard work. ;) Good stuff my dude.
calories are stupid if a person is on some sort of ped tbh . other than it only become somewhat not important if u have a good idea of what u are eating meaning experience
@@biolayne1 my comment doesn't refer to you Lol but to this Dave that doesn't trust "calories theory" but speaks about Thermic Effect of Food (i.e. calculations based on calories) I am a Physics MSc student, of course I trust thermodynamics 😅
Its hilarious bullet proof coffee that has 500 calories but its good to lose weight... thanks biolayne for being honest once more. High protein low carb diet is great depending on the person for me i got rid of the water weight easy, if i eat many carbs i am bloated but for someone else it might be different.
@@net-flix yes on micro nutrient level foods interact differently in the body but in order to loose weight the body needs to be in a caloric deficit period. so it’s not the macros or Keto or intermittent fasting that’s making u lose weight even if u use these you are losing weight because u are in a caloric deficit while using these diets
@@fl676 You believed in the math done for you by Layne which assumed there is no big difference. Now that I told you there is big difference, you backtrack on your words.
@@net-flix 🤦🏻♂️ u still need to be in a deficit to lose weight even with the different interaction with macros food in the body. Layne went over this . Watch his video again .
@@net-flix that’s like me saying protein has a higher thermic effect so I’ll just eat protein U will still gain weight if I eat to much of it and lose weight if u eat to little calories . At the end of the day u gain or lose weight based on the calorie intake . Surplus or deficit . Now to be healthy obviously u don’t eat all the calories In candy , eat balanced diet
He's being pragmatic and assumes most of the population eats an adlib portion, and lack the OCD it takes for lifelong calorie tracking. I mean no negative connotations with the term OCD, many top tier performers in the world leverage this neurological difference.
@@biolayne1 no it doesn't require repetitious steps and in extreme cases a computer in your pocket to assist with making those calculations. Wash your hands over and over is an obsessive behaviour. Weight yourself often, same idea. Don't eat sugar is a rule to follow. It requires no additional repetitious rituals, it requires modification of existing ones.
Try eating 300 grams of protein a day and very little carbohydrate or fat and the TEF goes through the roof. Ever heard of the term "meat sweats"? It's real.
Who cares about Thermic Effect of Food? It's not gonna make much difference in your desire to lose body fat. But eat more protein instead of carbs will make a difference. This is because of different factors besides the silly Thermic Effect of Food.
Better Life PT Studio If you believe in calorie counting, thermic effect is a big deal. In a 100 calorie comparison, carb net calorie is 90 while protein net calorie is 70. That's 20 calorie difference in just 100 calories.
I come here to learn. it's a shame you have to resort to these silly thumbnails like every other youtuber. What a world we live in.... Change it to just a picture of yourself.
I've watched five seconds and I'm coming to comment. Big upgrade on sound. I mean, I don't give a shit because I'm not here for the editing, but it was a big jump in sound quality.
I'm kindof confused. Why does this have to be so childish and insulting?
BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH MORE FUN THAT WAY
@@biolayne1 you are just running out of content. So everything will do for now right🤡🤡
@@almir4768 Yeah such a lack of content...
You must be new here.....
@@almir4768 he's been doing this segment for a long time now, and even had a pre-cursor to it (Fuckery Friday). And that's not even close to all he posts. We need more Laynes out there debunking bad info and calling out the people who pass it.
what's up friday, it's guys
Friday up guys, it's whatsup
Love the new editing mate
Classic Layne! Love it! I am a huge fan and have been in the "fitness" industry for nearly 20 years and hated the way it had gone and lost hope for the people who actually know what they are talking about. Enter Layne!! Keep it coming. We need you!
Excellent. Love the new format and whatever you did to improve the sound quality 👍👍
People will believe anything when it tells them they don't have to be personally accountable for their own actions.
Keeping the mistakes in here make this one of the best videos I've seen from you. It makes you look more human, which makes you more trustworthy. Not that I didn't already trust you more than DA, but some hubris helped bring you to our level. Keep having fun with videos in this fashion.
Ugh! Bulletproof coffee guy.
LOVE the new format and editing style. A HUGE improvement over the last few videos. Sound quality is on point as well. Fantastic job guys!
I'm blown away by how few subscribers you still have. Your content is the best blend of intelligence, common sense, and humor. Fine by me, I remember seeing Lamb of God when they only had 2 albums out, now they are one of the biggest bands in metal. Give it time!
That's 3 yrs,how are they numbers looking since then?
I always kick off my weekend with this series and this one did not dissapoint
Dude great video Layne! The humor was definitely Next Level and I love the way you guys have been doing the videos lately. Such important information and it does fascinate me that people still want to idealize certain foods. Now obviously there's huge benefits to eating whole foods and higher protein because it's just more satiating, more nutrient dense, and will help you reach your goals faster. But you're absolutely right that some of the benefits are over blown like this situation that you're talking about. Thanks for the content and all the best!
Editor getting better, keep it up
I do like using TEF to my advantage though, by eating very lean proteins like shrimp, white fish, egg whites. Eating 400 calories of pure protein, you might just absorb 300 calories worth. Pretty damn cool especially on a cut.
Video production is thru the roofffff!!!! Watch Layne’s channel double in subscribers just cuz of that. Nice job Layne 💪🏽🔥🔥🔥🔥💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽🔥🔥🔥🔥
let's hope so
Great editing. Really makes the video interesting to watch.
Best one yet !! Keep em coming!!
Love the new editing, camera lighting, and microphone clarity. Keep going this is great!
Keep em coming Dr. Norton! The Mike Tyson edit killed me 💀😆
IT FUCKING KILLED ME TOO LOL
Great vid!
Thanks for another one of your AMAZING videos, I cannot say how valuable and insightful your content has always been! And the new editing is great!! If it is ok, could I ask how you calculated the Net after TEF per macro group? I am only aware of the generic TEF calculation formula, and would be interested to learn.
Yeah I love the new editing too! This is the exact kind of style I do with my videos to make them easier to watch/understand xD
more editing than last time. 👍
I love that you dont get scared of swearing in your videos. It makes you seem more real. Just the right level of informal speech. I am enjoying your channel. I like that you also have good educational credentials.
This one had me rolling. Great one and excel points made!
Calories are indeed stupid, when I have too many I get fat!
Every time I go off diet, those damn calories put me in caloric surplus. Outrage
@@scorlanvoone Intolerable. Thankfully, you can put butter in your coffee to avoid getting fat, because it does not spike insulin. That's science. Or something...
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 Impossible and nutrition don't mix well usually. More than that, impossible and biology don't mix well usually. I'm not going to argue. You're assuming the satiety mechanism is fail safe, research points otherwise. You're assuming a lot of things actually, referring to it as a single mechanism when it's a complex psychobiological system. Even just anecdotally, it's not uncommon that people report continuing to binge far after their physically feel full. Oh, yeah, I suppose it's the carbs fault (and I'm being sarcastic)...anyway, as long as your diet works for you, I'm happy. Stay healthy and happy!
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 I perceived you said the exact opposite: that the satiety systems would necessarily stop healthy people from overeating on butter in a low carb diet model. I am contending that as it is all but fail safe, and as such is not a guarantee people following the diet you mention will indeed stop before reaching a notable caloric surplus. In simpler words: low carb/keto diets are not magic insofar as they would prevent you from getting into a caloric surplus. And neither will they prevent you from accruing fat in said situation.
@@everydamndayobesityobsessi3137 if you say so. Again, using extremes such as "impossible, never, always" etc. is something I try to avoid as much as possible as a biologist. "Too full" doesn't mean anything. Ask anyone who's been on a binge. I'll concede that you can retort "how often do you hear about low carb/keto binges?" and anecdotally I'll have to give this one to you for the sake of integrity. But to be frank, while I thank you for your responses, I'm not interested in discussing low carb/keto diets any further when I feel they are painted as that magic trick that will somehow hack your system into perfect intuitive nutrition. My overall analysis of the nutrition literature as a biochem/cell bio PhD and former clinician has been telling me otherwise for a decent time now (I'm not making an argument of authority here, however I do claim with confidence that I am better equipped to analyze and contextualize a corpus of research than the regular person who thinks they nailed it because they read an abstract from a study that seems to go their way). Again, in the end, what matters is that you find the diet model that works for you and your lifestyle. But none will work for everyone all the time. And in this I did speak in absolute, but I'm confident enough about this statement to do so :-)
My favorite segment 👍🏋️
Excellent stuff, Dr!
Big fan of these videos, keep it up!
Thanks, will do!
You are so Funny!! I laughed out loud about the Mike Tyson reference! I am new to your channel, but loving what I've seen so far.
Thanks!
@@biolayne1 You were comparing a slab of meat to a little lollipop. You should compare it weight for weight. Even if the meat contains fat, a 100g meat will still have much higher tef than a 100g sugar. I noticed you always do this when your subject is about calories.
Thanks for another entertaining and interesting video that cuts through fitness industry BS.
butter in coffee sounds like milk in popcorn to me
Hey Layne, would appreciate if you could dig into the possible danger of L-Carnitine due to producing TMAO? Is this overblown?
Obligatory post-Chino editing critique 😂 keep up the good work Layne 👍
Hi Layne, thanks for all the informative and entertaining videos. I am a MD trained in Germany, lifting weights for over 40 years (I know, I am old!) and have followed the industry since I started lifting weights in my teens. I am always a bit confused about some of the conventions. When I went to Med School I was taught that carbs have 4.1- 4.2 Kcal/g and fats have about 9.3 Kcal/g. As for protein: it has 5.3 Kcal/g with a net 4.2 Kcal/g AFTER TEF according to my recollection. Could you please clarify 1. The use of 4, 4, 9 Kcal for the macros (is it just because it is easier?) 2. Is the subtraction of the TEF for protein from 5.3 Kcal or from 4.1 (4.2)? Thanks!
Great video great editing still a lot of room sound just my 2 cents
Saw a podcast (w/ Max Lugavere iirc) with him the other day where he said that "Kale is as bad as smoking", while being really silly and not particularly respectful. And he repeated that multiple times in different ways, it wasn't just something he didn't mean. In another podcast (w/ Paul Chek) he said that it's absolutely not true that many biohackers are abusing supplements for shortcuts and avoid doing the basics. I think I'll cut down from 2 podcasts/year with Dave to something closer to none. Love the biohacking stuff, experimentation, biochemistry, some weird stuff, higher fat diets and playing around with supplements, but there are certainly better resources out there. Marketing behind the brand is still fucking nuts.
he's a straight up huckster
Fook me, you are such a great teacher! You are highly entertaining and I learn everything I watch. You should have 100x the views
And most people are going to have a hard time eating 45% protein, especially if they are eating close to maintenance. If you're getting 200 grams of protein (which is a solid amount for most people) that's only 32% of a 2,500 calorie diet. Realistically, you're going to fill out the calories with carbs and/or fats. And if you want to lose weight ... just cut some of the fats and carbs rather than try to generate a small deficit by wasting money buying extra meat just for it to be converted inefficiently into energy.
Biceps popping! 💪🏻👊🏻
Scientific as always. Thank you for calling these fools out.
120 cals would be ~1lb month weight loss/gain depending on which way you go. Agreed, not the cure to the epidemic but definitely a powerful tool to add into the equation. Very simple switch tripling protein that should be sustainable. Triple protein and cut fat would be an even greater tool. Thanks, Layne.
This is like saying mph are dumb because there are varying efficiencies of engines/vehicles
hi, is it normal and possible that while I'm on caloric deficite I gain 1 kg after 1 week of start taking creatine? but my waist mesurments goes down 1 cm
Yes, you are just holding on to more water thus the weight gain
@@joaolopes3029 agreed and holding water in better places (the muscles)
I just wanna buy some recovery, but it's sold out😭
So put beef in the coffee instead?
lmao
I live in your area and I have been following you on IG for awhile. I found you originally through Crunch on IG and I totally want to be your friend. Your knowledge is great and you just seem like a funny cynic like I am.
Love how Layne puts everyone in their place!
Question, wouldn't it be more wise not to have such a high fat percentage of calories exchange them for more carbs or protein? Not saying eat 0 fat, that's almost impossible, and yes I know we need "healthy" fat in our body to keep things running. Why not 15% fat daily?
It's something with light, or with your right eye?
who makes that t-shirt?
So good
Is it known WHY protein is more satiating (I accept that it is, I just want to understand why)?
This is not true ... in fact, calories are very smart ..
Fr, they keep going where i don't want them, lol
Lmfao. Your tongue was on vacation this day. 😂
6:45 - dead!
Once, just once, I'd love if Dave would address his bullshit claims. It'll never happen. But I can dream.
The high protein diet example you used looks more like a keto diet- any High protein diet I’ve done has been 45g fat and the remaining balance would be carbs - which would mean more than a 120 calorie difference: that’s a lot for women! I don’t agree with everything Dave says but I see his point here
but he recommends a high fat diet. And that diet is not keto
That was one angry layne!
Great
Calories are not stupid, you are stupid when you don't know how to use them.
Eating less 120 kCal a day for 6 months means you've got 6lbs less fat
120 kCal for a 2000 diet is a lot btw
I agree with him, now I think gravity is stupid.
I like the vid quality and the info being typed on the screen was crisp and clear, not that I don't love your your whiteboard work. ;) Good stuff my dude.
Lol I love these takedowns
Lookin lean man 💪🏼
I just found you and would enjoy your videos more without the bad language.
calories are stupid if a person is on some sort of ped tbh . other than it only become somewhat not important if u have a good idea of what u are eating meaning experience
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
When adequate amount of latex is not manufactured then people like Dave are born. 😂😅🤣(Also when adults are not aware and educated) 🤣😅😂👍👍👍💪💪💪🙏🙏
Calories are stupid, calories don't matter, nutrition is not algebra but to prove it I make calculations based on calories
Lol
actually everything is math & physics bro... you just aren't smart enough
@@biolayne1 my comment doesn't refer to you Lol but to this Dave that doesn't trust "calories theory" but speaks about Thermic Effect of Food (i.e. calculations based on calories)
I am a Physics MSc student, of course I trust thermodynamics 😅
What does an ad for this precede the video?😂
I don't count macros, but dammit I ain't putting a stick of butter in my coffee!
Its hilarious bullet proof coffee that has 500 calories but its good to lose weight... thanks biolayne for being honest once more.
High protein low carb diet is great depending on the person for me i got rid of the water weight easy, if i eat many carbs i am bloated but for someone else it might be different.
Bathically protein guud.
LMFAO
@@biolayne1 love your content man! Hilarious and seriously informative AF.
He's selling BS so he has to keep up the BS to keep selling.
Greg Doucette would approve that✔
Bring back the intro
Yeah D A V E
7:13 EZ Clap
For the algorithm
Exactly no big difference
U and Greg doucette did the math for us .
It’s calories in calories out
CICO
F L Layne's math is wrong. A 100 calorie lollipop has more net calorie than a 100 calorie rib eye.
@@net-flix yes on micro nutrient level foods interact differently in the body but in order to loose weight the body needs to be in a caloric deficit period. so it’s not the macros or Keto or intermittent fasting that’s making u lose weight even if u use these you are losing weight because u are in a caloric deficit while using these diets
@@fl676 You believed in the math done for you by Layne which assumed there is no big difference. Now that I told you there is big difference, you backtrack on your words.
@@net-flix 🤦🏻♂️ u still need to be in a deficit to lose weight even with the different interaction with macros food in the body. Layne went over this . Watch his video again .
@@net-flix that’s like me saying protein has a higher thermic effect so I’ll just eat protein
U will still gain weight if I eat to much of it and lose weight if u eat to little calories . At the end of the day u gain or lose weight based on the calorie intake . Surplus or deficit . Now to be healthy obviously u don’t eat all the calories In candy , eat balanced diet
He's being pragmatic and assumes most of the population eats an adlib portion, and lack the OCD it takes for lifelong calorie tracking.
I mean no negative connotations with the term OCD, many top tier performers in the world leverage this neurological difference.
because eliminating food groups isn't OCD
@@biolayne1 no it doesn't require repetitious steps and in extreme cases a computer in your pocket to assist with making those calculations.
Wash your hands over and over is an obsessive behaviour. Weight yourself often, same idea.
Don't eat sugar is a rule to follow. It requires no additional repetitious rituals, it requires modification of existing ones.
Bro you might get sued for the tattoo lol
The Aspey dude is an entrepreneur and got rich on people's ignorance ... Sad!
Try eating 300 grams of protein a day and very little carbohydrate or fat and the TEF goes through the roof. Ever heard of the term "meat sweats"? It's real.
Perfect layne on point.. nicely kicking asses of ass holes 🏋️♂️✌😎
🔥🔥🔥
Who cares about Thermic Effect of Food? It's not gonna make much difference in your desire to lose body fat.
But eat more protein instead of carbs will make a difference. This is because of different factors besides the silly Thermic Effect of Food.
Better Life PT Studio If you believe in calorie counting, thermic effect is a big deal. In a 100 calorie comparison, carb net calorie is 90 while protein net calorie is 70. That's 20 calorie difference in just 100 calories.
I like your beard like this
"Hormones"
Thank you for this content - I will forward it to all the idiots in my life
TEF of bullshit through the roof! Loved the clip.
I come here to learn. it's a shame you have to resort to these silly thumbnails like every other youtuber. What a world we live in.... Change it to just a picture of yourself.
Like and comment for the usual great content & YT algorithm.
Nice im last.
lmao dude hahha. yeah pretty sad how that dude comes up with some BS to market his stuff. keep it coming bro :)
Really cute haircut. I always like the beard / shaved sides and back combo.
4:01 I was hoping Dwayne johnson
Are you kidding? Dave is going to live to a 180 and you're doubting him??? ;)
Haha. Love the fails 👌🏽
I've watched five seconds and I'm coming to comment. Big upgrade on sound. I mean, I don't give a shit because I'm not here for the editing, but it was a big jump in sound quality.