Hi, I didn't understand the PPT15 quite well. Based on my understanding, the Family-wise Rate is the probability of committing AT LEAST one type1 error (which I think is the false objection on the ppt), but on the ppt, it shows that Family-wise Rate is P(false objection at AT MOST one hypothesis). Is this a typo on the ppt? Please correct me if I am wrong. - Thanks in advance for any reply. :)
I am not sure if I understood correctly. The family-wise rate is to guarantee that no false-positive occurs in the experiment, NOT AT LEAST one type1 error. It makes you sure about all your results are true.
Thank you for upload of your lecture to public channel so that we can know more about biostatistics
I'm a big fan of you! Also a big fan of Josh Starmer!
Thanks , I would agree this studies on genomics.
Hi, I didn't understand the PPT15 quite well. Based on my understanding, the Family-wise Rate is the probability of committing AT LEAST one type1 error (which I think is the false objection on the ppt), but on the ppt, it shows that Family-wise Rate is P(false objection at AT MOST one hypothesis). Is this a typo on the ppt? Please correct me if I am wrong.
-
Thanks in advance for any reply. :)
I am not sure if I understood correctly. The family-wise rate is to guarantee that no false-positive occurs in the experiment, NOT AT LEAST one type1 error. It makes you sure about all your results are true.