I hazard a guess that were this video broken into two smaller chunks there would be more views. Some people are intimidated by longer content or have short attention spans. It’s a shame because this content is top class. 👏🏻
Delivered casually, while bringing out subtle points very sharply. By far the most lucid explanation I've seen. Thanks for taking the time to make the video and for giving it to the world for free!
Ngl, that first question was hard for me. I had to attentively watch the solution to get a solid understanding of the concept. But then the second question became a breeze for me once I familiarized myself with the underlying statistical ideas. Feel much more confident about my knowledge of Hypothesis Testing now. Thanks for making such high-quality content! Really appreciate it :)
Amazing videos!!! You have made all the statistics concepts easy to digest and understand! Thanks a lot and please keep it up!!! P.S: just found out that your videos are being used as our lecture recording... WOWWW...
Only halfway through this video but this video is really helpful for getting an intuitive understanding of the concepts for hypothesis testing. Thank you!!
17:27 For both cases, to evaluate the variance of p Var(p)=Var(N)/N_t^2, one needs the variance of N, Var(N), the latter can be evaluated using E(N)=p(d/dp)(p+q)^Nt and E(N(N-1))=d^2(d^2/dp^2)(p+q)^Nt, where q=1-p, and p=p_0 or p_1 and Nt is the number of total samples, such as n_0 and n_1. I kinda think the derivation is omitted in the video (is there a more straightforward way to see it?) so write it down here a side note.
Thank you very much for this comprehensive and intuitive video on hypothesis testing. I was wondering if we could get this example in code. Maybe in python or another technology or maybe suggest us another video that works on this. Thank you again I feel that this video helped me more than anything in understandying deeply those concepts.
great video and illustration. I really like the big map and putting all the details in one long video, very comprehensive and saved my time of finding all short scattered video.
I am bad at statistical methods. you follow an intuitive approach that helps. but i need more examples to understand what those formulae in most books mean and when to use which one. hope you keep making such videos.
Awesome video :) Couldn't wrap my head around why is the variation of the red and black distribution different in the second exercise? Please advise if possible, thanks
For the power calculation, why is the T1 statistic normalized to the standard error of the null hypothesis, sqrt(V_H0), and not the standard error of the alternative hypothesis sqrt(V_H1), because later on you use 0.1 as the theta_hat and not 0.
At 39:29, you say confidence interval crosses zero because p=0.58 is greater than 0.05. Could you clarify how to infer it crosses zero if calculated p value is greater than 0.05 ?
Thank you so much, I've been watching the videos on your channel and they've really helped me to develop my intuition into the difference procedures. Although, I still get stuck on the 2-tail test being more stringent than the 1-tail test - so it is harder to show that the mean is not what we think that it is than it is to show that the mean is larger than we think it is... ??? It will take a while to get used to.
For Part (a), I did something slightly different. I calculated the point on the x axis where the H0 curve at the 95% mark. I got 0.058154 (I know spurious accuracy). I then calculated how much of the H1 curve was to the left of 0.58154 (mean 0.1, sd 0.035) and subtracted it from 1. I did it this way so I would understand where 2.8284 had come from.
i did my problem similar to your process but my 95% mark is coming as 0.11567685 could you help me in how you got your value or what i may be doing wrong( i used excel function of norm.dist with mean of 0 stdev = 0.70711 and then goal seeked my x value) thanks!
Very well explained in the video. The method of hypothesis testing curve would work well in case of binary events, as the variances of null and alternate hypothesis curves have been calculated using the binomial distribution formulas. How to draw the hyposethis curves when the event outcome is more than binary, say three or more possibile outcome?
@13.58... I'm doing a retrospective on our experimental design choices....... we got a result on one side.... why did we get a t-statistic on the right-side? because we set out parameter estimate as p1-p0... if we set our parameter estimate as p0-p1 we would have got the t-statistic on the other side of the tail-end.... More importantly, It occurred to me that p1 and p0 are defined as positive outcomes (asking is there a sig difference in one therapy having more positive-outcome than the other?), but if we did negative outcomes instead (asking is there a sig difference in one therapy having more negative-outcome than the other?), I suspect we would still be able to reject the null hypothesis, but we would be working with a different normal distribution and then depending on how we setup our parameter estimate we would get a t-statistic on one end or the other.... BUT both questions should lead to the same conclusion.... self-consistent with each other... I don't know if its worth doing twice the work... but it might give confidence that the therapies have normal distribution.... which would reinforce the self-consistency, thus the validity of the test.
Hi, firstly of all thanks from the bottom of my heart for this video. Secondly, why we can't have sameness in our alternative hypothesis? The distribution of difference at 16:18 would just have a higher number as a mean and the decreasing differences on the both sides. Where beyond a critical value the sameness should exist?
You will make a really good cricket commentator. You got that voice 😀 But pls don’t quit making tutorials. Thank you for very clearly explained videos.
As always, amazing it is. On the first example, while standardizing the normal distributions, the test statistic which was used was "T". Why isn't it Z statistic? (I'm just a beginner here, sorry for the question)
Sample size was large enough for a z-statistic to be used, instead of the t-statistic. T-statistic is for very small samples/observations. Z-statistic is for large samples/observations. (*Usually, more than 30 observations - use the Z-statistic; less than that - T-statistic. )
This is a brilliant video! I love the Zedstatistics series. Query: I learned the 0.05 level of (in)significance was a product of the 95% confidence interval (the other 95% under the curve includes 2 standard errors). Is this wrong?
Any chance you still respond to questions> Preparing for an exam and i am unsure at 1:03:22 when testing power, how you got the value of 0.1159. Thank you for your help bud
At video 58 minutes why do you not divide by n-1 or 400-1=399 instead of 400. This is an important concept I do not understand. One never knows the true variance and only knows the same variance. Therefore I would expect the denominator to be 399 to reflect n-1. Respectfully submitted--WhetstoneGuy
Thanks for the great lecture. I'm new to statistics, I have a question regarding the test statistic used in this video. is the formula used in this video generalized test statistic or any specific test statistic ? I have read about Z-test , T-test given mean and standard deviation, sample size of population and sample. is power calculation applicable for only when proportion values are given ? It's little confusing for me.
At the 28:23 mark, I am confused by the conclusion :'...operative patients did better than the physio only patients'. This is a two tailed sample test. H1: p1 p2. So, if H0 is rejected, it can only approved that p1 p2. We can not refer that p1> p2. Please clarify. Thanks!
p0 is the probability of the positive outcome of the operated group, it is actually a **Bernoulli** distribution with the outcome being YES (with probability p0) or NO (1-p0). The variance of Bernoulli distributions is p*(1-p), and because it is a **sampled** distribution, the variance needs to be divided by n.
Hello sir. Why does theta have to equal "p1-p0=0" ? If they both subtract to give 0, then why can't one say: "p1=po"? Are different formulas used between these two ways to describe the null hypothesis?
Hi great video, At 4.55 mins, a graph pops out. Please correct if I am wrong, no way you will be able to see a plot like what you show if you were to toss A coin 100 times . are you implying tossing 1 coin 100 times and repeating this experiment N no of times ?
This distribution is not the distribution of random experiments or distribution we draw after tossing 100 times. In other words, It is not the sample distribution after making maximum liklihood estimation. It is just a binomial distribution of a fair coin. if you made the permutations you will find that equal number of heads and tails is the most frequent pattern. This curve shows the probability of getting for example 1 tails in 100 trials and 2 tails in 100 trials ...... and 100 tails in 100 trials. by trials i mean only one toss. This curve can also be generated by experiments as trials tend to infinity or by making many samples each sample contains a number of trials and then get the average of all the samples it will tend to 50.
I think there is an error at around 26:00. You are inserting p-hat (i.e. the proportions measured in your sample) for the "true" proportions p given by the 0-hypotheses. Shouldn't the resulting t be t-distributed instead of normal-distributed?
During the prediction of sampling statistic distribution, why the number of observation for p1 and p0 is different (i.e. n1 and n0) since if we are finding θ, the number of observations for the proportion of positive outcomes for both non-operative and operative should be same.....?
Can someone explain why the standard error is just the root of the variance? I thought it was the standard deviation divided by the squareroot of theobservations. Or is this somehow the same?
I wondered that as well at first. But I think the reason is that here we care about the standard error of an estimator for which we already calculated the variance, which includes the number of observations. The formula you are referring to is the standard error for a mean estimator where you only know the variance (or standard deviation for that matter) of a sample, not the estimator. I hope what I'm saying is clear and I also hope the reasoning I came up with is correct...
Thank you! can I ask you which software you are using to show your slides. I know that zooming can be done using Ms. Powerpoint, however not all possible.
at 25:54 why you chose to use pooled proportion BUT at 35:25 you did not use pooled proportion? I used θ ÷ sqrt(p1q1/n1 + p0q0/n0) as my test statistic which leads me to t=2.009868 is that okay as well?
@@harryfeng4199 i forgot how to do statistics nowadays 😂 but i think i got it when reviewing it today because of your reply. Note that at 25:54 we assume Null Hyp: p1-p2=0 but when calculating confidence interval, we have p1-p2≠0 instead. e.i. p1-p2=0.14 in that case, we dont use pooled proportions since at 35:54 we dont assume p1=p2 anymore unlike in Null Hyp at 25:54
Great videos Zed. Thanks. Should the Alternative hypothesis for the tail-biased example not be H_a not equal to 0.5 cause it can be larger or less than 0.5
Where exactely does that formula for the variance come from? In your other video on variance and standard deviation it is a totally different formula :(
If you're talking about the surgery example in the beginning then it comes from binomial distribution. Learn about central limit theorem and binomial distribution you will easily understand it.
Hi, I am just wondering if anyone knows why we used a T- distribution for the hypothesis test but a Z distribution for the confidence interval at 37:36?
The most under-rated(fewer views for an extraordinary content)
video on youtube
Thanks ! Well I don't advertise the channel but feel free to tell all your statistically minded friends :)
I hazard a guess that were this video broken into two smaller chunks there would be more views. Some people are intimidated by longer content or have short attention spans. It’s a shame because this content is top class. 👏🏻
00000000000000000000000000000⁰⁰0
Delivered casually, while bringing out subtle points very sharply. By far the most lucid explanation I've seen. Thanks for taking the time to make the video and for giving it to the world for free!
do you understand his "proof" of why they variance of the T statistics equals to 1 @ 22:58? Would you mind explaining it to me?
⁰
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
Ngl, that first question was hard for me. I had to attentively watch the solution to get a solid understanding of the concept. But then the second question became a breeze for me once I familiarized myself with the underlying statistical ideas. Feel much more confident about my knowledge of Hypothesis Testing now.
Thanks for making such high-quality content! Really appreciate it :)
One of the best channels ❣️ i enjoy learning from your videos. Thank you so much 🙏😇
I can clearly see your ability and understanding of how to present these concepts in a digestible way. You are fantastic at your job :)
You actually make me like statistics! I appreciate the explanations with the very understandable examples.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
No ads. Thanks for doing this👍
If my stat teacher can teach 10% as clearly as in this video...
I can feel your pain😥
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
the examples really opened my eyes on statistics, very well done!
Amazing videos!!! You have made all the statistics concepts easy to digest and understand! Thanks a lot and please keep it up!!!
P.S: just found out that your videos are being used as our lecture recording... WOWWW...
Only halfway through this video but this video is really helpful for getting an intuitive understanding of the concepts for hypothesis testing. Thank you!!
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
17:27 For both cases, to evaluate the variance of p Var(p)=Var(N)/N_t^2, one needs the variance of N, Var(N), the latter can be evaluated using E(N)=p(d/dp)(p+q)^Nt and E(N(N-1))=d^2(d^2/dp^2)(p+q)^Nt, where q=1-p, and p=p_0 or p_1 and Nt is the number of total samples, such as n_0 and n_1. I kinda think the derivation is omitted in the video (is there a more straightforward way to see it?) so write it down here a side note.
Thank you, your videos have helped change my life!
Thank you very much for this comprehensive and intuitive video on hypothesis testing. I was wondering if we could get this example in code. Maybe in python or another technology or maybe suggest us another video that works on this. Thank you again I feel that this video helped me more than anything in understandying deeply those concepts.
great video and illustration. I really like the big map and putting all the details in one long video, very comprehensive and saved my time of finding all short scattered video.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
I am bad at statistical methods. you follow an intuitive approach that helps. but i need more examples to understand what those formulae in most books mean and when to use which one. hope you keep making such videos.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
If I ever realise my dream of becoming an actuary it would have been you who got me there❤
Your way of teaching is AMAZING
Awesome video :) Couldn't wrap my head around why is the variation of the red and black distribution different in the second exercise? Please advise if possible, thanks
in Example 1 we have binomial distribution which the variance should be np(1-p).
For the power calculation, why is the T1 statistic normalized to the standard error of the null hypothesis, sqrt(V_H0), and not the standard error of the alternative hypothesis sqrt(V_H1), because later on you use 0.1 as the theta_hat and not 0.
I have the same question! Could anyone answer this please? Fantastic video overall!
At 39:29, you say confidence interval crosses zero because p=0.58 is greater than 0.05. Could you clarify how to infer it crosses zero if calculated p value is greater than 0.05 ?
Thank you so much, I've been watching the videos on your channel and they've really helped me to develop my intuition into the difference procedures.
Although, I still get stuck on the 2-tail test being more stringent than the 1-tail test - so it is harder to show that the mean is not what we think that it is than it is to show that the mean is larger than we think it is... ??? It will take a while to get used to.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
For Part (a), I did something slightly different.
I calculated the point on the x axis where the H0 curve at the 95% mark. I got 0.058154 (I know spurious accuracy). I then calculated how much of the H1 curve was to the left of 0.58154 (mean 0.1, sd 0.035) and subtracted it from 1. I did it this way so I would understand where 2.8284 had come from.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
i did my problem similar to your process but my 95% mark is coming as 0.11567685 could you help me in how you got your value or what i may be doing wrong( i used excel function of norm.dist with mean of 0 stdev = 0.70711 and then goal seeked my x value) thanks!
Excellent video as usual. One edit, if I may, at 31:19, it should be p
@ 22:58 why on earth the variance divided by the variance squared should be equal to 1??
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
Very well explained in the video. The method of hypothesis testing curve would work well in case of binary events, as the variances of null and alternate hypothesis curves have been calculated using the binomial distribution formulas. How to draw the hyposethis curves when the event outcome is more than binary, say three or more possibile outcome?
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
You're a star. Thank you
@13.58... I'm doing a retrospective on our experimental design choices....... we got a result on one side.... why did we get a t-statistic on the right-side? because we set out parameter estimate as p1-p0... if we set our parameter estimate as p0-p1 we would have got the t-statistic on the other side of the tail-end.... More importantly, It occurred to me that p1 and p0 are defined as positive outcomes (asking is there a sig difference in one therapy having more positive-outcome than the other?), but if we did negative outcomes instead (asking is there a sig difference in one therapy having more negative-outcome than the other?), I suspect we would still be able to reject the null hypothesis, but we would be working with a different normal distribution and then depending on how we setup our parameter estimate we would get a t-statistic on one end or the other.... BUT both questions should lead to the same conclusion.... self-consistent with each other... I don't know if its worth doing twice the work... but it might give confidence that the therapies have normal distribution.... which would reinforce the self-consistency, thus the validity of the test.
Hi, firstly of all thanks from the bottom of my heart for this video. Secondly, why we can't have sameness in our alternative hypothesis? The distribution of difference at 16:18 would just have a higher number as a mean and the decreasing differences on the both sides. Where beyond a critical value the sameness should exist?
You will make a really good cricket commentator. You got that voice 😀 But pls don’t quit making tutorials. Thank you for very clearly explained videos.
As always, amazing it is.
On the first example, while standardizing the normal distributions, the test statistic which was used was "T". Why isn't it Z statistic? (I'm just a beginner here, sorry for the question)
Sample size was large enough for a z-statistic to be used, instead of the t-statistic.
T-statistic is for very small samples/observations.
Z-statistic is for large samples/observations.
(*Usually, more than 30 observations - use the Z-statistic; less than that - T-statistic. )
Less than 30 sample we use T statistics and for samples above 30 we use Z score!!!
Great teaching! But at 17:05 variance and Linear Algebra are associated. What is the connection?
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
This is a brilliant video! I love the Zedstatistics series. Query: I learned the 0.05 level of (in)significance was a product of the 95% confidence interval (the other 95% under the curve includes 2 standard errors). Is this wrong?
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
At 22:57, why is the standard error just sqrt(var(theta)) and not sqrt(var(theta)/n)?
@ 22:58 why on earth the variance divided by the variance squared should be equal to 1??
Any chance you still respond to questions> Preparing for an exam and i am unsure at 1:03:22 when testing power, how you got the value of 0.1159. Thank you for your help bud
At video 58 minutes why do you not divide by n-1 or 400-1=399 instead of 400. This is an important concept I do not understand. One never knows the true variance and only knows the same variance. Therefore I would expect the denominator to be 399 to reflect n-1. Respectfully submitted--WhetstoneGuy
Thanks for the great lecture. I'm new to statistics, I have a question regarding the test statistic used in this video. is the formula used in this video generalized test statistic or any specific test statistic ? I have read about Z-test , T-test given mean and standard deviation, sample size of population and sample.
is power calculation applicable for only when proportion values are given ? It's little confusing for me.
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
At the 28:23 mark, I am confused by the conclusion :'...operative patients did better than the physio only patients'. This is a two tailed sample test. H1: p1 p2. So, if H0 is rejected, it can only approved that p1 p2. We can not refer that p1> p2. Please clarify. Thanks!
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
you already have the data, we are testing, we test when we have data and that is our case.
Great video but I was expecting a t-test in the first example. Why is it a normal distribution?
clt
Thank you so much for this teaching
Clear and informative
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
"We are attracted to it because it's nice and round" lol I don't feel that the choice of words here was totally innocent.
You are the best!!
Thank you for this video!
@18:10 Why the variance of the theta is p*(1-p)/(1/n1+1/n0)? variance for binomial distribution is p*(1-p)*n right????
I'd guess that binomial distribution is a distribution of sums of outcomes. And here we are talking about proportions.
p0 is the probability of the positive outcome of the operated group, it is actually a **Bernoulli** distribution with the outcome being YES (with probability p0) or NO (1-p0). The variance of Bernoulli distributions is p*(1-p), and because it is a **sampled** distribution, the variance needs to be divided by n.
While calculating expected value of T1, why variance of H0 is used instead of variance of H1?
Hello sir. Why does theta have to equal "p1-p0=0" ? If they both subtract to give 0, then why can't one say: "p1=po"? Are different formulas used between these two ways to describe the null hypothesis?
Hi great video,
At 4.55 mins, a graph pops out. Please correct if I am wrong, no way you will be able to see a plot like what you show if you were to toss A coin 100 times . are you implying tossing 1 coin 100 times and repeating this experiment N no of times ?
This distribution is not the distribution of random experiments or distribution we draw after tossing 100 times. In other words, It is not the sample distribution after making maximum liklihood estimation. It is just a binomial distribution of a fair coin. if you made the permutations you will find that equal number of heads and tails is the most frequent pattern.
This curve shows the probability of getting for example 1 tails in 100 trials and 2 tails in 100 trials ...... and 100 tails in 100 trials. by trials i mean only one toss.
This curve can also be generated by experiments as trials tend to infinity or by making many samples each sample contains a number of trials and then get the average of all the samples it will tend to 50.
I think there is an error at around 26:00.
You are inserting p-hat (i.e. the proportions measured in your sample) for the "true" proportions p given by the 0-hypotheses. Shouldn't the resulting t be t-distributed instead of normal-distributed?
This is a brilliant video, thanks👍👍
variance calculation shouldn't be V(p1)-V(p0) ?
no variance adds
During the prediction of sampling statistic distribution, why the number of observation for p1 and p0 is different (i.e. n1 and n0) since if we are finding θ, the number of observations for the proportion of positive outcomes for both non-operative and operative should be same.....?
great ! i like your energy
I love you! Greetings from Sweden
I am still confused about the variance linear algebra . is there anyone can help to explain a bit?
Mr. Justin Z--video 18.0: Why is V(P1-P0) the sum of V(P1) + V(P0) and not the difference of V(P1) + V(P0)
factor -1 out from V(-P0) as (-1)²
A very BIG THANK YOU from Bangladesh
I understood what you were saying until the test statistic formula.
Why the variance of the theta is p*(1-p)/(1/n1+1/n0)? I checked the variance for binomial distribution is p*(1-p)*n. Thank you
I had same doubt as welll. Did you get it?
I'd guess that binomial distribution is a distribution of sums of outcomes. And here we are talking about proportions.
Many thanks for yet another great video! Now it feels hopeful to me that I can manage this course :).
do you understand his "proof" of why they variance of the T statistics equals to 1 @ 22:58? Would you mind explaining it to me?
Excellent video
Can someone explain why the standard error is just the root of the variance? I thought it was the standard deviation divided by the squareroot of theobservations. Or is this somehow the same?
I wondered that as well at first. But I think the reason is that here we care about the standard error of an estimator for which we already calculated the variance, which includes the number of observations. The formula you are referring to is the standard error for a mean estimator where you only know the variance (or standard deviation for that matter) of a sample, not the estimator. I hope what I'm saying is clear and I also hope the reasoning I came up with is correct...
Was it coincidence that the critical value was 1.96 and rejection was at 1.99 a difference of 0.03 and alpha 0.05 was p value 0.047?
Thank you! can I ask you which software you are using to show your slides. I know that zooming can be done using Ms. Powerpoint, however not all possible.
Looks like Prezi to me
at 25:54 why you chose to use pooled proportion BUT
at 35:25 you did not use pooled proportion?
I used
θ ÷ sqrt(p1q1/n1 + p0q0/n0)
as my test statistic
which leads me to t=2.009868
is that okay as well?
did u manage to figure out y, im confused on that as well
@@harryfeng4199 nope. 😅
@@harryfeng4199 i forgot how to do statistics nowadays 😂 but i think i got it when reviewing it today because of your reply.
Note that at 25:54 we assume
Null Hyp: p1-p2=0
but when calculating confidence interval, we have p1-p2≠0 instead.
e.i. p1-p2=0.14
in that case, we dont use pooled proportions since at 35:54 we dont assume p1=p2 anymore unlike in Null Hyp at 25:54
@@carlostolosa6530 thxxx!
This is awesome!
Are you using Prezi making these videos? Or May I know what tool u used to make your videos? TIA
How does the sample difference go on to +/- infinity, when P0 and P1 are both probabilities ? (around 20:30)
at 6:51, isn't the true probability should be close to 0.08? cause the y axis is probability.
Hey there ! Amazing content! Thank you so much. I have a question, how do I calculate the left critical value?
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
Extremely helpful! Thank you so much!
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
Great videos Zed. Thanks. Should the Alternative hypothesis for the tail-biased example not be H_a not equal to 0.5 cause it can be larger or less than 0.5
OH yes onetailed and twotailed and hence alternative can be larger than... og not equal to... :-) Thanks mate
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
example is really tough for beginners...try choosing a simple example instead of a complex one....
Thank you brother.
Life saver!
Thank you sir!!
- raph
Where exactely does that formula for the variance come from? In your other video on variance and standard deviation it is a totally different formula :(
If you're talking about the surgery example in the beginning then it comes from binomial distribution. Learn about central limit theorem and binomial distribution you will easily understand it.
@@kushalvora7682 @18:10 Why the variance of the theta is p*(1-p)/(1/n1+1/n0)? variance for binomial distribution is p*(1-p)*n right????
@@ajaxaj8470 Because each patient has Bernoulli distribution => variance for one patient is p(1-p) and you have n patients so you divide it by n :).
It is clear thanks but to defined hypothesis again teacher
Bravo!
Excellent
At 1:03:21, did he mean to write .1151 for the cdf (-1.20)?
I am sure that several persons might have completed PhD after watching your videos (including me) likely to submit within next two months
Good stuff!! Thank you
Nice Video!!! But from 59:22 here, I am starting to confusing...
same i have no clue from that exact point
Hi, I am just wondering if anyone knows why we used a T- distribution for the hypothesis test but a Z distribution for the confidence interval at 37:36?
ruclips.net/video/RkL3cG5QHbE/видео.html
Thanks!
A savior
21:00 I may say 0.05 is 5% that is the two-sigma limitation, a lot of standards use two-sigma limitation.
Excellent!
Thank you!
do you understand his "proof" of why they variance of the T statistics equals to 1 @ 22:58? Would you mind explaining it to me?
i like to be very sure in my tests so my alpha is 0.0420
how do you make slides?
Which software creates this bubbly presentation?
prezi
H1 is wrong at the beginning....
good
I have never been more confused in my life
Any thoughts on why it would be wrong to approach this as a chi square test for independence (i.e. recovery being independent of treatment)?
Did anyone notice, Justin is probably color blind!! @47:26
Thank uuuuuu
trying so hard to understand :(
fucking good video
P-value