B58P is the only plane I've ever flown in that crashed (New Year's Day, 1991). Nobody (six adults) was hurt, and the plane returned to service. I'd still fly on one. I love the rear-seat configuration, and the wraparound windows. The Pilots (co-owners, flew DC-10's for United and had their Baron set up with those avionics) said that the round-trip from Denver to Miami with stops in Atlanta and Chicago, took a lot less fuel at 30,000ft than it would've taken at lower altitudes, and we would've been bounced from the pattern in Atlanta (didn't quite make it to Chicago, let alone back to Denver, on the return) if we weren't pressurized, and therefore able to comply with what ATC needed us to do, to keep our place for landing. IANAP.
Baron G55 (cringe), x-plane (cringe), G58-shows B58 exterior and interiors (cringe), rain protection system (cringe). 56TC is not pressurized. The 58P is pressurized. They are B56TC, B58, B58P and only the only “G” is the G58. Plenty of videos out there to get footage better than X-plane. Good research, but could be a touch better. But it’s cool when enthusiasts love our airplanes. You’ll rarely see a Baron do 450 hrs per year, unless it’s a commercial operation. Must of us do 80-250hrs per year. While I used to do 150-200, I’m now between 120-150hrs per year. Pretty typical. Annual budget = do not show your wife or spouse the receipts. 😆 On interior capacity, Baron’s can carry 5-6 adults with no problem. Remove some fuel. I’ve done 5 full size American men, or 3-4 adults + 2-3 children completely comfortably. Definitely higher operating cost. Can’t skimp on a Baron. And for the record, I own a Baron.
B58P is the only plane I've ever flown in that crashed (New Year's Day, 1991). Nobody (six adults) was hurt, and the plane returned to service. I'd still fly on one. I love the rear-seat configuration, and the wraparound windows. The Pilots (co-owners, flew DC-10's for United and had their Baron set up with those avionics) said that the round-trip from Denver to Miami with stops in Atlanta and Chicago, took a lot less fuel at 30,000ft than it would've taken at lower altitudes, and we would've been bounced from the pattern in Atlanta (didn't quite make it to Chicago, let alone back to Denver, on the return) if we weren't pressurized, and therefore able to comply with what ATC needed us to do, to keep our place for landing. IANAP.
Dream twin.....for sure............I like it a lot better than the Seneca........good vid.
Baron G55 (cringe), x-plane (cringe), G58-shows B58 exterior and interiors (cringe), rain protection system (cringe). 56TC is not pressurized. The 58P is pressurized. They are B56TC, B58, B58P and only the only “G” is the G58. Plenty of videos out there to get footage better than X-plane. Good research, but could be a touch better. But it’s cool when enthusiasts love our airplanes.
You’ll rarely see a Baron do 450 hrs per year, unless it’s a commercial operation. Must of us do 80-250hrs per year. While I used to do 150-200, I’m now between 120-150hrs per year. Pretty typical.
Annual budget = do not show your wife or spouse the receipts. 😆
On interior capacity, Baron’s can carry 5-6 adults with no problem. Remove some fuel. I’ve done 5 full size American men, or 3-4 adults + 2-3 children completely comfortably.
Definitely higher operating cost. Can’t skimp on a Baron.
And for the record, I own a Baron.
Add fadec to this iconic aircraft
How about the Cessna 310
Do a video on the Piper Aztec.
Excellent idea!
The Riley Rocket 337
Space Shuttle
This video has many inaccuracies.
Please can I have one.
Not G55, B55
What a terrible video. G58P? Turbo G58? These don't exist
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤...