Trinity Test Latest HD Restoration
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- Original Trinity Footage restoration includes removing dirt and scratches and minimizing some defects in the processing of the original negative. Three shots include a wide shot, a medium shot and a close up scanned from the 35-mm original negative.
Check out our Playlist of Atomic Explosions at:
• Atmospheric Nuclear Tests
scanned from 35-mm original negative.
#Oppenheimer #trinity #atomic #nuclear #losalamos
![Tsar Bomba Declassified Documentary Upscaled 4K60 [Read Description] [Turn on CC]](/img/1.gif)
Awesome fact , the tower the bomb was on top of was not vaporised but shattered into millions of pieces that can still be found near the test site.
Exactly because of how fast the explosion expands by the time the nukes goes off the hottest part of the fireball is already wayy bast the tower
When I visited pieces of the tower were nowhere to be seen.
@@Larsosborne They were blasted far away from the tower . Watch the documentary about project Orion James Dyson the lead physicist mentions the pieces were everywhere
You lost me at the bomb was on top of the tower
I've never heard that. Can you give a reference?
This scene in oppenheimer.. The tension, my heartbeat. It was insane wow. Nolan really made me believe as if I was part of the trinity project myself.
The explosion in the movie was underwhelming IMO, it didn't capture the scale nor the intensity of the real test.
@@zsiem sucks to be you then
@@zsiemDid you not watch it in a 70mm IMAX theater? Or at least regular IMAX? You either watch this movie in IMAX/LieMAX or don’t watch at all lol
Lmao There are only 19 theaters in all of the United States that even have the capability of projecting the film in 70 mm. Not like that would improve the look of the damn explosion, anyhow. The image is the image. Increased resolution can’t change the structure of the explosion.
@@getreal2592 It’s not all about resolution. It’s more about increased field of view resulting in pure immersion. Pooler IMAX is where I viewed this, and the screen is 101 feet wide by 76.2 feet tall. That’s nearly 7,700 square feet of screen real estate. Sitting in the dead center, the screen was so large that it engulfed my field of view and even left room for my peripheral vision. It really was like some sort of weird headset free VR experience. In fact, it was so immersive that at times, my brain/eyes were fooled into thinking that I was seeing three-dimensionally, almost as if there was a sense of depth of field.
So yes, actually, it would most certainly change how the explosion looks, feels, hell even tastes, smells, sounds etc lol. Respectfully, I believe you’re terribly misinformed on this. But don’t take my word for it, experience it for yourself and tell me how it goes!
Anyone else feel the scene in Oppenheimer didn’t do the scale of this explosion justice?
Yes, he should have used at least 50% CGI to make it look accurate.
@@Arcane_Pulse-f7nor even colourising the original footage would be more impactful
100% agree. If Nolan was trying to portray the actual shock and awe the real life team experienced at the detonation site, he failed, miserably. Watching this RUclips clip shakes me to my core. Watching Oppenheimer in IMAX did not.
@@ryantrudell4686He did what he could. The actual flash impact of it was really cool. Yes the explosion itself didn't hit as much before of his limit of not wanting to use CGI but you can't deny that the entire thing was masterful
@@1mindlesswriter875 10 years ago in 2014, he used CGI for Interstellar’s blackhole, it was magnificent. CGI has come so far, he should have used some CGI to enhance the shot, he didn’t use CGI so that he can brag about that he didn’t use any CGI
0:31 THIS! THIS! This is what lacks in the movie, an actual fire ball that looks like a sun.
They didn't show that because it's so bright it can only be seen with welders glass
@@politecat3299 More like the actual explosion is nothing but a normal fuel tank explosion because Nolan just refuses to use even 1% of CGI to make it look like an actual atomic bomb explosion. “It’s so bright it can only be seen with welder glasses”? Seriously what kind of ridiculous excuse is that?
Totally agreed! This is the shot the scene was missing! Honestly they should’ve just used this shot in the film. If not then use cg to help simulate it. I get he loves practical, but you just can’t get the scale of a nuke from a fuel tank explosion
Irl in real life that ball is so bright it looks like the sun is right there and you couldnt be able to even see the detail. Plus they have that at the start of the movie.
@@yokgor4675you see what oppenheimer is seeing. He doesent have a zoom to see that fireball. We only see its sheer brightness and the pillar of fire once the brightness is bareable for him to take off the welders glass.
I mean, look at the firs frame of the entire video. The fireball is so damn bright that the bright spots on the fireball expose the film to black even with a welders glass. Imagine looking at that with a welders glass.
I was holding my breath the whole time while sitting in the edge of my seat with a racing heart while watching this scene in 'Oppenheimer'. They really focused more on actor's reaction especially Murphy's during the explosion. One of the most outstanding sequences ever in Film history
The only thing you could really hear was his breathing.
I felt like the movie explosion was incredibly underwhelming. It didn’t look like some divine force of destruction capable of wiping humanity off the planet. It was just a decently big fireball
@dawica I think in the movie it seemed like a moment of beauty in the chaos, almost like something divine in a much more literal sense. I actually like the direction they took and I think it would have been much more generic if it was just a huge loud explosion. The moments of silence with it igniting and lighting up the land for far stretches was pretty insane in its own right. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I can see how this might be a let down especially for people used to Christopher Nolan's bombastic moments like in Interstellar with the waves or docking sequence
After the tension build up, I thought the silence then shockwave hitting like a jumpscare was a great choice. I guess I feel like the explosion sequence they went with fit with the rest of the movie a lot better. Contemplative mixed with bombastic
@@irecordwithaphone1856 I wasn’t hoping for it to be “just a huge loud explosion”. I wanted it to be THE explosion. Trinity was an order of magnitude more powerful than the Halifax Explosion. IRL Oppenheimer saw this weapon he had built and thought “I am the destroyer of worlds”. The test scene should have filled the audience with simultaneous feelings of awe and horror. Instead, it just looked like any other large Hollywood explosion
@@dawica its not possible since nolan did not will not and never use real nuke/atomic bomb and still he wanted practical scene so thats so far the best shot can get
The scientists knew that after this, the world would never be the same.
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
@@MattScales Robert Oppenheimer
@@user-qj9ms6kl1o No. It's said by Krishna
@@GauravSharma-dy8xv Said by Krishna, quoted by Robert Oppenheimer in an interview regarding the nuclear test.
yup they knew they could massacre innocent people
This is what I was expecting to see in Oppenheimer
same... im so disapointed
me too
I was told by a friend that the movie was NOT like Fat Man and Little Boy but focused on Oppenheimer's life. I disliked General Groves, but it was truer he was portrayed this way. He was a miserable SOB!! A family member worked on the GADGET project at Los Alamos. It was insane from the stories I heard. 😢😮
@@pedroesteves3018 I wasn't? did you expect explosion porn? You guys are hating for the most stupid reasons.
What's really terrifying is that this is a firecracker compared to what is existence today. This was only a few kilotons while today the US and Russia have warheads in the multi-megaton range.
They also have phased plasma rifles in the 40 watt range...
@@JacquesMesrine94 So... that's strong enough to whack a mouse? A 50BMG is ~20KJ. At 40 watts, it would take roughly 500s ~ 8mins of continuous application to reach that energy. Hell, a typical microwave is 1000W.
@@pierrecurie you know your guns, pal.
@@JacquesMesrine94 I don't - google does
No they don’t. Multi megaton weapons were abolished/decommissioned years ago because they’re inefficient and bulky. Smaller and more precise weapons up to one megaton is the trend today.
Seeing this in Oppenheimer with Nolan’s take… Nerve wracking, intense, and above all, potent
so many people hating on the explosion in oppenheimer, i can see why, the full shots of the explosion didnt really scream atomic mushroom cloud but its still one of the best scenes in movies for me with the buildup, the silence, and the closeup shots of the fire were really cool
exactly, it’s not about UNGG WOW LOOK BIG MUSHWWOOM CLOWD!!! the complete wall of fire and flash are what get the point across, better respresents the complete destruction that would end up tormenting oppenheimer way more clearly than some big boring cgi explosion porn jerk fes
also it’s all about the buildup, the tension is what kills you not the bang
@@anthonyianmonday yup exaclty
One of the best movie scenes I've ever seen. I've come to appreciate the practical effects of it more now too. It doesn't look exactly like the trinity test, but there have been some big fiery nukes before, and I thought the mushroom shape it took looked great, especially the last mushroom cloud look when the fire faded and it was just becoming smoke.
@@SimpleJackPCno they should have used cgi.
seeing the recreation of this in Nolan's Oppenheimer was...just insane. the fire, the silence, and the sound was just tremendous in IMAX.
edit: why can't people just enjoy a film and not whine about every tiny little thing. i agree the explosion was a bit of a letdown, but the bomb wasn't the main focal point of the film. it's called Oppenheimer, not Trinity. if you can't sit through a masterpiece of a tense political thriller because it didn't have enough big explosions, then don't watch it.
it was good but it was not in any way as shocking or spectacular as the real test. Should have used cgi imo
@@mateogomez48100% true.
@@mateogomez48 a real genuine explosion is more spectacular than cgi. sure the CGI explosion could be much more like the real one, but then it's just the same as all other movies that just use CGI. a real explosion made the movie feel so much more real.
@@prowelshmanIt’s only spectacular if you’re there in person. Otherwise it doesn’t matter what’s used. The films version was an utter disappointment. It needed to capture the destructive power.
@@prowelshman What you are watching already has cuts, it's a film, not reality, not a documentary, it has sound, music playing simultaneously, none of which is real/ happens in reality, if you want to watch a genuine explosion, just watch this trinity footage, but film is an expressive medium, it's not there just to reproduce reality, a filmmaker needs to use the best tools in his arsenal to make the viewers feel the destructive powers of the bomb, the magnitude of it, the visceral feeling of it, the horror of it, the change it creates in the atmosphere and most importantly, tell/emote something through it, not just recreate it for the sake of authenticity.
0:52. At this point, the ionization, lightning, and even a head-like shape at the bottom of the image is an interesting phenomenon
Who's ready for Nolan's - Oppenheimer
I am!
Unreal excited
Pumped super duper pumped
YES!!
Brushing up on research! That IMAX experience is gonna be like front row at trinity!
from 745 - 800 is just terrifying....even moreso knowing that this fireball came from Plutonium the size of an M&M.
what was the part before that?
It was actually more like 1 kg. While the energy released is equivalent to ~1 gram of mass, nuclear fission only releases a small fraction of each atom’s mass as energy. Almost all of it stays as mass, forming smaller atoms
Awesome to have more footage. Great channel. Keep it coming.
thx Tron
Wow. I can only imagine how good that looks without RUclips's lossy compression.
нет слов... идиотизм не лечится.... а в своем городе такую красоту нет желания увидеть? может у японцев спросим об этой красоте?
@@user-xl9cm7we5f how about now
@@user-xl9cm7we5f can we ask the Chinese about Japanese activity’s in Nanking?
@@softdrink-0 exactly
@@softdrink-0 every person in east and southeast asia knows that japan deserved 2 nukes, maybe even more
Incredible footage. Literally changed mankind.
For the better, and for the worst.
@@mainstreetsaint36 for the worst
@@mainstreetsaint36 not a single thing was better
It is 1000 x better than movie. Truth is stranger than fiction
The end of the World as we know it in High Definition Quality.
@Blob B Until it doesn't
@@tl_nik0n353 lol keep dreaming
Am I the only one who felt like Oppenheimer fell short of emulating that explosion as seen in this video
the shot tower was almost 6 miles from the nearest observation bunkers.
A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent...
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." *- Robert Oppenheimer*
He quoted krishna
If only the explosion scene in the movie oppenheimer looked like this 0:31
To people complaining that the scene in Oppenheimer "wasn't massive enough": the point of the scene wasn't to be giant explosion porn. The point was to show what people were seeing. Oppie himself was watching from miles and miles away, as were the soldiers and others at the site. For everyone right there and then, that's exactly what the moment was to them: just a giant explosion in the distance.
Yes, we know "the real explosion was much bigger". Nobody is denying that.
Steven seagull can karate chop a mans neck with more gravitas than that oppenheimer dreck. Seriously though, nolan has a hardon for obscuring & muddying dialogue with music & noise. Fuk me dead, i was almost deafened throughout, and, no joke, i tore my ticket receipt up and stuffed it in my ears (had no tissue). Its still a good character study movie though. If people want the explosion porn they should turn to 'Trinity & Beyond'
They were the same distance away as the camera in this footage. The movie scene was just a disappointing gasoline fire
@@ldull2765 to you
@@dandindanTo most people except for fanboy of Nolan.
The whole film was disappointing.
@@ldull2765Yep that explosion was a complete joke.
Imagine how terrifying the first second was, not knowing when it will stop expanding.
oops! it ignited the atmosphere!
When I watched Oppenheimer in theaters, I cant tell you how scared I got when they basically just jumpscares you with the shockwave after the blast out of no where. everyone pretty much jumped out of their seats because it was genuinely terrifying to be hit with such a sudden boom. They really did a great job in the movie of depicting every asset of the real bomb.
Except for how the actual detonation looked liked. It looked nothing like real nuclear fireball, because there isn't any realistic way to mimic nuclear explosion with regular explosives.
Good for Nolan to keep his pride and not use CGI or archived footage but in my opinion it would have been better in this case if he had swallowed his pride. Because for me, after watching countless hours of actual nuclear test footage before, it was immediately clear that in the movie it just didnt look anything like what it really was.
You probably get scared by fnaf.
@@spinosaurusstriker the fuck are you on my ass for? It’s a fucking natural human reaction to slightly jump after being hit by a super fucking loud Dolby surround sound BAM out of fucking no where after suspenseful build up.
how is it a jumpscare if you knew it was coming..thats how explosions work
pretty much no one in the Beirut explosion (2020) recording the preceding fire expected such a shockwave. people just don't have that thought in the moment. @@BarkerVancity
My eyes simply couldn't resist dropping tears when I saw the moment in the film. Being a huge history & war buff, I instantly realized just what had been created. Thinking how brilliant the invention was but how horrific its consequences could be. Nolan has done it again, I didnt cry when I cremating my father during the second covid wave but this movie was truly a watershed moment for me.
And equally brilliant was the fact that I'm a Hindu and my family has been reciting the Bhagwad Geeta in the house ever since I was a child. I don't know Sanskrit but I've started to read the english translations. I loved how I instantly connected with Cillian Murphy in the movie.
Nolan managed to make an impact, but here you really feel much more
At 42 through 52 seconds you can see a quadruped running left to right approximately 50-75 meters bottom center of frame stirred up by the blast. I'm sure it didn't run much farther than that.
seems more like birds
I'm thinking debris. nothing would be left alive and hopping around at that proximity
@@MelancoliaI It may have been birds that were further away, but just seemed closer due to the zoom.
@@Arch3an Definitely looks like birds.
Actually there's 3, I'm guessing pronghorn antelope, running left to right one right after the other. What gives them away is how they bound like a deer. I lived in Roswell for over a year, drove past the Trinity site twice, and seen most of central and eastern NM. Trust me, as arid as that region is and as free-ranging that pronghorns are, it makes sense.
Seeing this on 70mm IMAX was incredible, beautiful, and horrifying. Nolan made another masterpiece
Except you didn't see this on imax, you saw a crappy recreation.
@@delta.5thnku
you weren't there, bo. @@spinosaurusstriker
Of all the great videos and adaptations of what an Atomic Bomb looks like i dont think we can comprehend how big and powerful this explosion is unless its in person
No, a simple mushroom cloud on scratchy low resolution black and white film will do.
Just finished oppenheimer. All i can say is wow
There it is, and still in 2023 Christopher Nolan expects you to suspend your disbelief for his gas canister fireball.
This is what it should have looked like in Oppenheimer
Ye but unfortunately Nolan has too much self pride to not use CGI or even use digitally enchanced footage of this original Trinity test footage. Im sure he and his team made their best to create big explosion using just regular explosives but the matter of fact is you can never mimic nuclear explosion with regular explosives. The shape and size of the fireball is something that is impossible to re create with ordinary explosives
Finally the comment I was looking for. All the rest people don't know what a nuclear bomb scale is. Nolan completely failed
completely failed? nah the rest of the movie was incredible@@Losermessi
@@Losermessi well when you make a film thats gonna win best picture, we will all be rooting for you to win the best special effects Oscar
@@danbh84 Trust me, I don't need Academy certification which is worth nothing. Bloody Will Smith winning Academy means any tomdick Harry can win it.
My school project would look better looking and will have a better story than Nolan's. Nolan makes movies on things we were fascinated as kids but as a grown up we don't think there is anything new he adds. Better watch discovery documentaries which are much better.
Truth is stranger than fiction
I am so interested how they made all the effects in Oppenheimer and if they used some footage like this to achieve it.
They didn’t use effects
It was practical. Nolan used gasoline, nitroglycerin, and magnesium to create a massive explosion. Then camera tricks were utilized while filming to make it appear much larger and slower than it was
@@gioberto855
actually they did use CGI to show a fake fireball that kicks dust.
They also used some Operation Teapot footage to show rope-tricks.
And then they sprayed a barrel of gasoline into the air to fake a mushroom cloud.
I guess the flash shown in the film was made practically, by dispersing a cloud of fine magnesium powder that self-ignited on air.
@@gioberto855 Practical effects are effects...
@@phdnkthis movie had zero cgi
Nolan should have use this instead of the fail attemt of the explosion on the movie. or maybe a little bit of CGI would have help big time.
Alien Lieutenant: Commander, I'm detecting a neutrino pulse consistent with a crude fission detonation emanating from Earth.
Alien Commander: Dispatch a squadron of scout ships to investigate at once.
Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man. For this he was chained to a rock and tortured for eternity.
Why is the actual moment of detonation missing from this restoration in the first (wide shot) sequence?
it may have be soo bright it burned the film or just was pure white
iirc the yield was a bit above what they expected, so the camera was probably overexposed.
The initial blast is so hot it only produces x-rays which are invisible to typical cameras and need specialized equipment to form an image (we use telescopes that can pick up x-ray now to peer into nebula and dust clouds etc for example) so the camera is only able to pick it up after the fireball cools to emit "visible" light which does happen very quickly, its likely the video starts at that moment however I could be wrong.
This looks way more intimidating in regards to the bomb shown in Oppenheimer
Yeah because it’s an atomic bomb, you fucking dumbfuck.
Absolutely amazing work
Oppenheimer movies fireball needed to be wider with huge updraft
Well, Nolan doesn't do CGI. They rigged up their own pipes to create the mushroom cloud. The real one was larger but actually the lower part of the explosion in the movie was remarkably similar. It was awesome and dreadful to see.
Can't wait for Oppenheimer, tbh.
_"I am now become Death. The destroyer of worlds"_
“Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds”
FTFY
"I think everybody thought that. One way or another."
D´ärQ?
The fact that "Man" has this much power should scare the absolute hell out of you! 🇺🇸
This looked better than the Oppenheimer one.
I think Nolan made a mistake relying on practical effects. CGI mixed with practical explosives could have created a moment that devasted the audience with the awesome apocalyptic power of the bomb, what we got instead really felt like a gimmick of a small explosion being made to look like a large one.
I think colorizing this footage and splicing it in would have been more powerful a visual than what he gave us.
Fortunately the visual of Trinity Test itself is not necessarily that important a part of the film, which is less about the explosion itself than what it means for humanity.
Indeed it was underwhelming. Even if they used exactly this video it would still be much better.
@@WalkingTaakoYou get that Nolan can't splice this footage in w6th IMAX film, yes?
I don't want to set the wooorld ooon fireeee...
Cringe.
@@claudesigma3784 r/woosh
War...war never changes...
More exciting than oppenheimer
Explosion in the Oppenheimer movie was insanely underwhelming imo. It was THE scene that necessitated CGI. It felt like a demolition test youd see in a hollywood backlot. As you can see, real trinity test lit up the entire horizon. I barely felt that power from the movie
Indeed. Nolan wouldnt have had to even use CGI entirely to create Trinity test fireball, all he needed to do was take this footage and enhance it with some CGI and AI
The matter of fact is that the explosion we saw in Oppenheimer didnt reflect one bit the terrifying power of the bomb, it just looked like regular explosion.
take this footage? then he's limited to the clips that this footage shows, even if he colours and uses AI on it@@Balnazzardi
You already know Nolan was somewhere on this part of the internet reading comments :D
1:10 that was on the movie
Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.
~my penis
It's extraordinary how many anguished human faces are formed and dispersed as the fire ball twists and turns. It maybe just my imaginative mind forcing these images to come and go, but it's weirdly disturbing.
Gotta say. They recreated the look of this blast very well in the movie.
No they didn‘t
Wtf how can you say that? Do you have eyes?
Cristopher nolan fans are on the same level as transformers fans on delusion.
Not really, the explosion looked more like a conventional bomb more than anything. Mushroom cloud at the end looked good but it was barely visible at that point
What?? They absolutely did not.
Could it be possible for the afterglow of the explosion to be visible 540 miles away, specially from a place that was as dark as the detonation place itself?
Good question
I’d imagine it could be slightly noticeable yes. Light can’t just be stopped by anything other than a solid object, so If you had a good line of sight, the air quality was crisp and clear, and you were looking right at where the explosion was you might’ve been able to see a tiny bit of it from that far away. I don’t think it would’ve been terribly noticeable though
Yes, you can.
Oppenheimer paid due diligence to the original footage. Awesome stuff!
wdym the explosion in oppenheimer was garbage
@@MrCoconutv3 think you're in a very exclusive club with that take homie
You must be blind my dude, buy glasses.
@@dixonmixin10 Think again. Anyone who knows nuclear test footage agrees that the film depiction was inaccurate.
@@cow_tools_ The real explosion wasn't that big, think again, nuclear scientist wannabe.
This explosion in the movie pales in comparison…
can't wait to see this in IMAX next year
yeah, i'm very interested how Nolan is going to portray all of this in his new film
I haven't heard, what's going to happen in IMAX?
@@keithgifford2386 oppenheimer
What did you think?
@@thecandyman9308 imax showings in san antonio got cancelled cause mf employees dont give a shit about their sound system, it broke
Now that's more like it.
im encrypting this video to a gold disk and sending it to the aliens.
Nolan’s bomb was such an underwhelming replication. A complete dud
It was the largest man made explosion in all of human history at that point by an astronomical margin, and the movie Oppenheimer somehow found a way to make it look small.
This was Equivalent of 20 Kilo Tons of TNT. Hiroshima was 13-15 KT. Nagasaki was again 20KT. Trinity and Nagasaki were implosion bombs with Plutonium fuel. Hiroshima was a Uranium 235 gun-type fueled bomb. The Manhattan project just had enough 235 enriched at Oak Ridge for one bomb but Truman wanted Japan to believe we had more.
Was updated to 24 in 2021 when the data was reanalysed
I have 3 little pieces of trinitnite, bought at a souvenir shop. From there. Slightly radioactive. Thanks St.Paul,Minnesota.
The explosion in Oppenheimer was quite underwhelming
for a moment I really felt that I was present there at the trinity site. Could feel it
Christopher Nolan watched this video
Anyone.... 🔥after watching Openheimer.... 💥✨️
Can you see the birds? I definitely can the the birds. From 0:41 onwards
@Kino C Debris don't have wings, duh
Was going to post this until I saw your comment. At 1080p on a large-ish PC monitor you can very clearly see their wings flapping. Definitely birds, though it might look like flying debris on a smaller screen and/or lower res. Judging by their apparent size as compared to the fireball, they are much closer to the camera than the explosion, which is certainly many, many miles away. They very well could have survived the blast, though they were probably exposed to some amount of fallout since Trinity was a surface detonation.
@@r-saint Its birds! 100%
@@Duncan_Idaho_Potato birth of Rodan
@@richardm8807 lmao... hope they use that for the Godzilla sequel coming out soon!
I think Nolan should probably have used CG or CG with some in-camera effects to reproduce it, as in the film it really just look like a gasoline explosion (which it was)
Gandhi wants to *know your location*
My location: ???????????
I shall denounce Ghandi and his psycho plan of world domination.
When did Gandhi become khabib
Shiva would like to know your location.
You won the Internet with that amazing comment. Don't trust Gandhi ^^
Makes you wonder how big the fireball and dust cloud was when the object hit earth at Meteor Crater. Equally destructive sans the radiation.
who's here after seeing Oppenheimer in Cinemas?
I was so zoned in watching the footage from the first camera that for the first time in my life I got a jump-scare from a silent video.
Starting at 41 seconds, you can see a flock of birds fly off at the bottom of the screen.
Who else is here after watching Barbie? 🙋♂️
NOLAN is planning to shoot this practically!
Not "planning". He already did it.
Where is this angle taken from and what does it show exactly? 0:55 onwards I've never been able to figure out what I was actually seeing in this particular angle, as things appear to be moving at _Unusual_ angles to the rising cloud.
@jayc2469 - I'm going to attach a link to another RUclips video - also from atomcentral - that has camera details included for these three sequences. To answer your question, the third sequence was pointed upwards towards some barrage balloons. The distance from Ground Zero was 9140 meters (All three sequences were from 9140 meters.) but unfortunately (and maddeningly) the altitude of the barrage balloons was not given, so I cannot tell you what the vertical angle for the camera was.
According to the information on that other video, the camera speed was 119 frames per second, so assuming that RUclips is running at the usual 24 frames per second, the video would be (I think) slow-motion by a factor of almost 5x.
ruclips.net/video/7dfK9G7UDok/видео.html
@@nooneinparticular1491 Awesome. Thanks so much for all of the very useful information.
That angle always perplexed me as I certainly wasn't pointed at the explosion directly
@@jayc2469 I'm glad that I could help!
At 0:42 you can see something moving from the left to the right, toward the road. It is small, it could be an animal or else crossing from the left to the right of the road. An small black shadow in the lower part of the frame.
Yes, that probably the tumbleweed rolls cutted off and flung by reversal thrust.
As good as Oppenheimer was, Gadget explosion was extremely underwhelming after perfect build up. It's my biggest complain with Nolan, the guy seemingly out of spite rejects usage of CGI. First was Dunkirk with blatant Stukas models some 1/4 size of actual plane, and laughably small scale of evacuation. Here it was explosion, which felt like detonation of few classic Hollywood barrels, few hundreds meters away than atomic explosion several miles away.
He needs to get over himself for real and add cgi to the real thing. Would have made the scene so much better. And Nolan meatriders need to chill. Scene was cool but overhyped
@@beilog7489how is adding cgi exactly “getting over himself”? That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
@@ISleepAndIKnowThingscontext you singus, nolan wants to use as little cgi as possible even if it looks like ass.
@@ISleepAndIKnowThingsI think it means stop being such a weird luddite and use the full range of tools that are available to you.
He seems to have really gained that attitude mostly in the last, say, 6 years. Before Dunkirk, he was quite happy to use plenty of CGI, just look at the black hole and worm hole from Interstellar, and Two-Face from Dark Knight. I bet nowadays, he would absolutely NOT use a CG face for Harvey Dent.
I think Nolan could have chosen hits shots for the scene a bit more wisely. There were some shots of the explosion that simply looked incorrect. The close up shots of fire were fantastic as well as a select few but there is continuity issues in terms of the width and scale of the explosion that stand out and things just don't work. There's also various lighting errors just straight up incorrect direction.
nolan nailed this
Nah it looks pathetic
Nolan should have used at least 30% CGI, that explosion looks cheap, even Beirut non-nuclear explosion looks massive compared to Oppenheimer. Even his 10 years old film interstellar looks way better because it used both practical and CGI. CGI of Gargantua Blackhole looks phenomenal even in 2023.
No😂
@@madmax19furyroad22 well critics around the entire world disagree with u lmao
@@Arcane_Pulse-f7n if u want cgi go watch marvel movies lmao u philistines think the explosion was supposed to be as massive as the bomb dropped on japan-- you do realize the trinity test is real? why on earth would nolan use cgi to make the trinity test look bigger and faker than it actually was? philistines!
“Theory will take you only so far.”
As an old rock that once belonged to the place, it was quite a painful day.
I don't know why but I have a huge fascination with Oppenheimer and the bombs
Nolan should have used at least 30% CGI, that explosion looks cheap, even Beirut non-nuclear explosion looks massive compared to Oppenheimer. Even his 10 years old film interstellar looks way better because it used both practical and CGI. CGI of Gargantua Blackhole looks phenomenal even in 2023.
0:40 - When the frame count reaches 1000, in the bottom left corner (just above the dark line - one third from left to right) there is a small flash and something runs. It looks like a large animal breaking through an electric fence and running fast .
Loving the content lately!
"Now I have become Death, the destroyer of worlds"
- Robert Oppenheimer, July 16 1945
Ok Ok, who’s here after the premiere of the Oppenheimer trailer??
RIP to those birds flying in the second shot...
Who else is here after watching Oppenheimer?
Props to the camera man for moving the camera up, that would be the last thing I'd do, even if that was my job...
Do you see your future?.
ahahahaha LOL 😂
We just shot a icbm out of the sky5
I do, and I'm not looking forward to it.
I see my past.
We see this, we see the recreation in "Oppenheimer" and we still will never truly know the feeling of actually witnessing it.
Pov: you are here because of Oppenheimer movie.
"I am become Death,. Destroyer of worlds.""-Robert Oppenheimer, quoting from the Bhagavad Gita.
Can you imagine being up and seeing and hearing it from a distance, wondering "WTF was that?!"
Nolan gonna use this in the film I know it
I see a bunch of people watching this and comparing it to Oppenheimer. Just shows how conditioned a lot of people are to consuming Hollywood's trash and calling it "good" because all the reviews they see tell them they are supposed to think it is good. Oppenheimer came across like it was researched, written, and produced by high schoolers. Fat Man and Little Boy told the story so much better.
You must be one of those r3tards that think there is only fine dinner or Mc donnalds , when people are complaining that the HISTORICAL footage is better than your shitty michael bar pyrotechnic then the problem is not them but the movie.
A cena mais impactante do filme foi momentos antes da detonação, o meu coração ficou. A mil se tivesse mandado no filme está cena seria mais top que a original
os rojão que eu solto aqui em casa são mais forte que essa recriação do nolan. Quebrou totalmente o clima do filme, a grande "destruídora de mundos" parecia aquelas bombinha trak que vc compra no 1.99, e das mais vagabundas ainda