Unleashing the Tornado: Exploring the Sky with the Hawker Plane's Twister-like Power.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 июн 2023
- Unleashing the Tornado: Exploring the Sky with the Hawker Plane's Twister-like Power.
Welcome to the world of the Hawker Tornado, where air superiority meets timeless elegance. In this captivating video, we dive deep into the legacy and impact of this classic fighter aircraft. Join us as we uncover the secrets behind its design, explore its historic significance, and marvel at its power and grace in the skies. Whether you're an aviation enthusiast or simply curious about the marvels of engineering, this video is sure to leave you in awe. Don't miss out on this extraordinary journey through the history and capabilities of the Hawker Tornado.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hello friends! Welcome to Mysterious Super Plane channel. Come to us, you will know the history and development of aircraft lines, aviation history from beginning to now. while delving into many lesser known stories of the aviation industry.
Please support us by subscribing to the channel. Thank you!
#Mysterious Super Plane#HawkerTornado#AirSuperiority#AviationLegends
#ClassicFighter#AerialDominance#TimelessElegance
At last, a video about the Hawker Tornado, thanks.
The Hawker Typhoon was the ancestor of both the Tornado, Tempest and Fury.
The Vulture wasn’t replaced with the Merlin but rather the Griffin. The Vulture was a descendant of the Kestrel with the Vulture being a twin Kestrel with the engine banks arranged in an X-pattern.
Correct ! And not too many know that !
The tornado was the ancestor of the typhoon, tempest and fury. The vulture was replaced with the sabre to become the typhoon. .
_Please don't confuse the Typhoon _*_MK I_*_ with the Typhoon _*_EM KAY EYE_* *. . . ;-)*
@@letoubib21 I'm not. Seeing as the tornado first flew in 1939 and the typhoon mk1 in 1940. I don't see how the typhoon can be its ancestor.
@allangibson =
If you're gonna try to be a "Smarta$$ - Know It All" then AT LEAST get the name AND spelling of the engine right
It's (Rolls-Royce) "GRIFFON" not (Vauxhall) 'Griffin' FFS
.
It does look cool. I like that double row of exhaust pipes.
Yes, it did look cool. I was kind of surprised they didn't mention the Napier Dagger " H " engine testing.
Hang on, aren't virtually all of the pictures you have have actually Tempests?
My thoughts exactly.
There are very few available photos of the Tornado so not much choice really, and some are copyrighted so can't be used without expensive permissions - they all bear a common lineage of which the Tornado is the origin so he's done his best with what he could get.
Nonsense. It's misleading and ridiculous.
And the robot voice is tragic
I recently posted my own 'Mystery' Hawker Typhoon video with a difference, so l know only too well its not always possible to use the photos you would like, either due to copyright issues as mentioned in another comment or there just wasnt that many actual photos taken of the subject matter, as by the looks was the case with the Tornado.
Regardless you are to be congratulated in giving the Tornado a much need platform 👍
The SN 274 was a breauty!
It does look so much like the Tempest 😮 wich should have been as successful as the Typhoon 😮xx.
The image at 1m 6s has contra rotating props. 😳
This is actually quite a good video - let down only by errors in pronunciation in the commentary.
Centaurus - a centaur is a mythical half man half horse beast from ancient Greek mythology - pronouced Sen - tor. Centaurus - sen - tor - rus.
The Centaurus IV, like many marks of both aircraft and engines, uses Roman numerals instead of arabic ones, so IV is 4. So it's referred to as the Centaurus Mark 4 or just the Centaurus 4.
Wright Cyclone - Wright as in right, Cyclone as in sigh - clone.
Well researched - do your own commentary don't ever use a bot.
19/20 and a like from me. Keep making these.
It's a text to speech AI, that's why pronunciations are wrong along with the odd cadence of the sentences
@@davem2369 Which is why, so long as you don't have a speech disability, you should always do your own commentary. Your viewers do much prefer a human voice every time.
Did you ever watch Drachinifel? He's a naval warfare chap and he used to use text to speech as you do but changed to doing his own commentary and his channel has grown way way beyond what he ever thought it would or could - so much so that he can fund overseas trips to visit museum ships in America for example.
You can do it. You know your stuff.
No, this person does not make good videos. They either use ChatGPT to generate scripts, or just steal articles. I know this because their Ar 196 video was a word for word script reading of an article I wrote for a website about the aircraft. Don't support this kind of thing, there are better channels.
@@Alexandros11 That's interesting. Thanks for the info.
Only time I flew it was in "Combat Wings: Battle of Britain".
A lot of pictures of Hawker Tempest's but I'm sure you know that, it's a good video otherwise!
Something wrong with your audio I can hear high frequency noise not un-like a separate track under your narration.
Potentially a world beating aircraft but rather like the Avro Manchester the Vulture was it's lamentable failure . .... l made this comment before watching ....... it seems every days a school day ! I certainly had never seen the contra rotating prop' version . And the Napier was the power unit of choice but was slightly bemused by Hawker dismissing the American power plant so readily . Many thanks .
Yep - and they cured the Manchester by peeling-off its two Vultures, sticking-on four Merlins, modifying its tail and calling it a Lancaster. The concept of the big twin-engined bomber took a nap for several years, until jet engines came-out. And what's really interesting is that across the Channel, the Germans were having an epic struggle with their own big twin-engined bomber, the He-177 Greif, which was bedevilled by (1) the OKL's insistence that it be able to dive-bomb, which sent it back to the drawing board and entailed a lengthy delay (Eric "Winkle" Brown found its controls too light, which worried him that the Greif would be easy to bend or break by too vigorous a maneuver; he said it was one of the few German aircraft he did not enjoy flying), and (2) its engine, the DB 606. This was almost as unreliable as the Vulture, and its cowlings were too tight, resulting in poor cooling and a grisly litany of engine fires; crewmembers called the Greif the "Reich's cigarette lighter". So what does the Greif have in common with the Manchester? - Ernst Heinkel had been trying to convince the OKL to let him ashcan the two DB606's and hang four DB601's on the Greif since 1937.
@@yknott9873 totally agree . But l guess this was on everyones agenda , friend or foe . Faster , higher and more deadly , whatever it takes ....
@@johndavey72 Yep, that's how wars are won. Another engine that fell victim to WW2 and is only just beginning to make a comeback now, is the aviation diesel. Diesels offer a lot of advantages to aviation, being torque monsters and torque is what turns propellers; they use less fuel, and it's lower-quality. Octane ratings of gasoline made the winning difference in WW2; but diesels burn simple oil, not octane-adulterated gasoline, and because they're squirting oil into their cylinders, they tend to last a lot longer than gasoline engines. Gasoline engines are lighter though, and much easier to modify for extra power, so "lighter" and "more powerful" carried the day - and who cares how much longer your engines will last when the airplane they're powering is just as likely to be shot down within the week anyway?
A weird one for you. One of the most successful aviation diesels of all time, made a huge difference to the war - but not by powering airplanes. It was an Italian air-cooled V12 of 500 hp, that the Russians really liked; they liked it so much that they copied it (likely without paying any royalties, since Italy was on the other side) and stuck it in all their tanks - it was the engine in the T-34 and KV series, right up to the JS-3.
@@yknott9873 The Germans used diesels in their high altitude reconnaissance Junkers in WW2 .
- And the BV138, and the Do-18 - likely one of the prettiest aircraft ever built. They were powered by the Junkers JuMo 20-series (I think 201 - 205), a fascinating opposed-piston diesel; Napier liked that engine and licensed it from Junkers between the wars, calling it the Culverin. Then in WW2 the RN was looking for light, powerful diesels for MTB's - preferably not gasoline-powered as running gasoline engines in enclosed spaces on a boat is just asking for flash-fires. Napier took three 204's and arranged them in a triangle, with a crankshaft on each corner - and the Deltic was born.
Yeah. Click bait?
Need to do more studying... piling up pictures and reading a book leads to mistakes and misleading claims. Since ye youngsters get everything as true .from the social media, they will end up misinformed or confused. Nice Tempest video theu...
Who writes these clunky commentaries?🙉🙉🙉
I've posted some constructive critisism for him recommending he ditch the text to voice in favour of using his own voice, and that's what makes it sound clunky. The actual content bearing in mind the excessive copyright permission costs are so expensive is quite good - there are several pictures of the Tornado and the aircraft that were part of the same development program there.
Lose the robot commentary. It's very distracting when so many words are mispronounced, roman numerals read as letters, 'RAF' being read as a word; etcetera etcetera.
_When I have the Wikipedia read to me about the plane, the computer doesn't make so very many stupid pronoucioation mistakes _*_. . ._*