So, in Finland K9 will be 40-60 km from the front, shoot 'n scoot. M270 MLRS will be 80-500 km from the front, shoot 'n scoot. Firing GMLRS, GLSDB, ATACSM ang PrSM from near max distance.
That won't take down GPS....LOL. EMP comes from disruption the Ionosphere by detonating at 20-40 km. GPS satellites are at 20,200 km. Let me repeat...the distance between an EMP creating detonation in the ionosphere and a GPS satellite is 20,160 km, or 12,500 miles. Where do you come up with these ignorant paranoid delusions. Let me guess...you are a Trump voting Republican.
@@frankmontez6853 EMP is delusional nonsense talked about by paranoid right wing kooks. The USSR gave up on it as any sort of weapon 40+ years ago, for a number of reasons 1. It is very easy to protect against. Simple wire shielding and grounding does the job. 2. It wold take a ton of atmospheric testing of nukes to really figure out how it works, and how to use it. This was not practical. 3. When the whole world is on fire, is it really that large of an advantage that some radios do not work.....
The video is about the Excalibur GPS-guided artillery rounds. Many types of 155mm gun systems can fire the munitions. The NATO gun systems can fire standard munitions or RAP or Excalibur GPS-guided artillery rounds. Yes, the Excalibur rounds are more expensive than standard round but they hit with precision accuracy, allowing danger close fire support, or hitting individual enemy targets with precision accuracy. Fewer rounds required increases effectiveness and also saves on logistical costs. Sometimes better is worth it.
@@eric55406 Rand Corp in a 2015 report to the Pentagon comparing howitzers mentioned the Paladin could rank with the PwH 2000, M777 and Cheetah using Excalibur shells. The range and spread of the others were better than the Paladin without the use of Excalibur. Using Excalibur would enhance the Paladin alternatives, too. For sure other factors figure in and what is most appropriate. The circumstances are unfortunate, but all of the these systems and others are going to get one heck of a comparison test.
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
Ooh my goodness, The enemies has no place to hide. I love it.
I still put my money on Russia to fuck up our woke military
The russian bandits have no place to hide. I love it.
@@Truthpatriot62 Lol ok.
So, in Finland K9 will be 40-60 km from the front, shoot 'n scoot. M270 MLRS will be 80-500 km from the front, shoot 'n scoot. Firing GMLRS, GLSDB, ATACSM ang PrSM from near max distance.
and the response will be Iskander
And this was 8 years ago….
Just think what they have now
...already?!?!
Most human problems can be solved by an appropriate charge of high explosives.
Artillery with GPS guided. Now that's a hell to live with.
Well ok .. How the hell does it even work ?
Cannon stronk
Its 2020.
What do ys think theyr cookin up now?
Sharks with frickin lasers on their heads
- goes them so hard hit you goes thinking is end of world
That's not funny if you're on the wrong end of the barrel.
Stupid question: What if the entire GPS system goes down? A couple EMP weapons, and we all drop to the level of PRK.
That won't take down GPS....LOL. EMP comes from disruption the Ionosphere by detonating at 20-40 km. GPS satellites are at 20,200 km. Let me repeat...the distance between an EMP creating detonation in the ionosphere and a GPS satellite is 20,160 km, or 12,500 miles. Where do you come up with these ignorant paranoid delusions. Let me guess...you are a Trump voting Republican.
You are right. It was a stupid question
Sorry, how do you propose to knock out dozens of them simultaneously from the ground?
Has it truly been proven that emp will take down electronics ? Hmmm..
@@frankmontez6853 EMP is delusional nonsense talked about by paranoid right wing kooks. The USSR gave up on it as any sort of weapon 40+ years ago, for a number of reasons
1. It is very easy to protect against. Simple wire shielding and grounding does the job.
2. It wold take a ton of atmospheric testing of nukes to really figure out how it works, and how to use it. This was not practical.
3. When the whole world is on fire, is it really that large of an advantage that some radios do not work.....
Some kind of bomb
I have you said now
- do not forgot
I'm trying to get winter moving to get dressed ! She just keeps on asking why why why !!! Grrr!! Lol
terminal guiding for moving targets?
The latest versions have this, yes.
- and you need remembering now
Checkmate
Algorithm.
Cost: USD 70k each.
Cheaper to go with the 155mm PzH 2000 system.
The video is about the Excalibur GPS-guided artillery rounds. Many types of 155mm gun systems can fire the munitions. The NATO gun systems can fire standard munitions or RAP or Excalibur GPS-guided artillery rounds. Yes, the Excalibur rounds are more expensive than standard round but they hit with precision accuracy, allowing danger close fire support, or hitting individual enemy targets with precision accuracy. Fewer rounds required increases effectiveness and also saves on logistical costs. Sometimes better is worth it.
@@eric55406 Rand Corp in a 2015 report to the Pentagon comparing howitzers mentioned the Paladin could rank with the PwH 2000, M777 and Cheetah using Excalibur shells. The range and spread of the others were better than the Paladin without the use of Excalibur. Using Excalibur would enhance the Paladin alternatives, too.
For sure other factors figure in and what is most appropriate. The circumstances are unfortunate, but all of the these systems and others are going to get one heck of a comparison test.
КУЕТА!