I am having difficulty thinking of an appropriate compliment for her wonderful Bach playing. I love how she reveals the genius of Bach's unparalleled genius so straightforwardly.
This Sarabande is to me one of the most profound and sublime pieces of music ever created. And she plays it with great dignity and gives it the breath it needs to reach the elevated levels of profoundness this piece reaches. I'm an atheist and this piece almost makes me believe in a god. Utterly beautiful!
I agree, her interpretation of the Sarabande (and Gavotte) are remarkable and my favorites. Not a fan of her interpretation of the Gigue. Just my taste.
Such an elegant flow... but when Gigue started playing, I was transported to another world, full of joy, energy and light... What a timeless and beautiful interpretation...
Very, very special thank you. Now I understand why Richter rated her so highly. Grate thanks to On The Top of Damavand for ever. And more Nikolayeva, please.
Since Bach never specified a tempo, especially for a piano, you really can't say that at all. I, for one, disagree. All you can really say is they get the tempo just right FOR YOUR TASTES.
Despite the fact that everything here is controlled by a genius brain, every note is completely spontaneous and at the same time "comes from the heart". It's not just absolutely perfect, it's perfectly absolute.
@@mackiceicukice Why go beyond the pace? The YT comment section is not about an in-depth review of interpretations. At the same time, I think that the choice of tempo is very important when performing a piece of music, the quality of the performance is determined by this, among many other things. In performing Bach’s works, the performer has some freedom in terms of tempo, as Bach did not prescribe it in most cases, so it is a matter of individual taste to decide who likes what tempo. In the music of later ages, such as the performance of Bartók's works, this freedom no longer exists, he specified in the score exactly how long the given piece should last. My comment on the tempo did not touch on Tatyana Nikolaeva's performing skills, which I hold in high esteem, but only on the fact that, when performed at different tempos, the same piece has a different effect.
@@ferenctimar I agree with almost everything you say- but the choice of tempo is just soooo personal and there is no right or wrong.It also depends so much on your age/ experience/ moment etc...I just get so fed up with people saying "too fast" and "too slow".I can see you are a professional musician.Maybe I was to harsh in my first reply for which I apoligise.Have a lovely day.
@@johnhertenstein5778 There is a certain long-held school of thinking and piano teaching that pedal should not be used in transferring Bach works composed for the harpsichord (and to a degree the clavichord) to the piano, on the grounds that the original instruments didn't have pedals. Such thinking ignores the differences between the modern piano and the original instruments, both in terms of sonority and mechanism.
I am having difficulty thinking of an appropriate compliment for her wonderful Bach playing. I love how she reveals the genius of Bach's unparalleled genius so straightforwardly.
Nobody can play Bach like this wonderful lady.
This Sarabande is to me one of the most profound and sublime pieces of music ever created. And she plays it with great dignity and gives it the breath it needs to reach the elevated levels of profoundness this piece reaches. I'm an atheist and this piece almost makes me believe in a god. Utterly beautiful!
I agree, her interpretation of the Sarabande (and Gavotte) are remarkable and my favorites. Not a fan of her interpretation of the Gigue. Just my taste.
These soothing melodies are truly the best way to end a busy day. I feel lighter and more at ease every time I listen to them.
I agree with You🎶🎹 from Far East 🗾🇯🇵JAPAN
Tottaly agree, I usually start my day with Bach!
Unforgetable !
Makes me drop anything I'm doing and just listen. Thanks very much for this superb post.
Such an elegant flow... but when Gigue started playing, I was transported to another world, full of joy, energy and light... What a timeless and beautiful interpretation...
Very, very special thank you. Now I understand why Richter rated her so highly. Grate thanks to On The Top of Damavand for ever. And more Nikolayeva, please.
I can see why Shostakovich and the jury were impressed. thank you for this very deeply appreciated post.
je ne m'en lasse pas ,merci
Lovely, really rings at this pace
Pianista immensa
Magical
Amazing. I love her playing.
Wow
Fantastic
Awesome
Bravo
Amazing
Excellent
Magnificent
Wonderful
Fabulous
Eine wunderbare und beglückende Interpretation!
Very impressive interpretation of Bach's French Suite
Thank you so much for the gift of this magnificent performance, as the amazing voice from the eternity.
I have listened to dozens of versions, and this and Joanna McGregor are my favourites. Both get the tempo just right.
Since Bach never specified a tempo, especially for a piano, you really can't say that at all. I, for one, disagree. All you can really say is they get the tempo just right FOR YOUR TASTES.
Preciosa interpretación!! My Godness!😍
Beautifully played!
Very delicate and transparent rendition..
Johann Sebastian Bach:5.G-dúr Francia Szvit BWV 816
1.Allemande 00:00
2.Courante 03:13
3.Sarabande 04:53
4.Gavotte 10:13
5.Bourrée 11:33
6.Loure 13:00
7.Gigue 15:21
Tatjana Nyikolajeva-zongora
Köszönöm az értékelést
Köszönöm az értékelést
Татьяна Николаева: как всегда блистательно!!!
The rendition, I definitely like best of all.
¡ Brillante, admirable e impecable, bravo !!!!
Beautiful and passionate
00:00 allemande
3:12 courante
4:53 sarabande
10:13 gavotte
11:33 bourree
13:00 loure
15:20 gique
Beautiful!
Magnifique! Gratitude ❤️👍❤️❤️❤️❤️
Just Magnificent
Celestial dynamics! Impeccable.
A great Bach interpreter unforgettable
Sing and Praise with joy.
Beautifully and culturedly played
The Glory of God
Despite the fact that everything here is controlled by a genius brain, every note is completely spontaneous and at the same time "comes from the heart". It's not just absolutely perfect, it's perfectly absolute.
🎉🎉🎉
🎶🌿🌱🥀🙂
Love this! Is there a better quality upload though?
The Gigue in her 1951 recording - when 26 years old - is one minute faster !
Maybe that was a bit too fast, but I think the Gigue in this presentation is too slow!
@@ferenctimar Here we go...a bit too fast...a bit too slow....an indepth review of anybody's interpretation! Can we go beyond that please !
@@mackiceicukice Why go beyond the pace? The YT comment section is not about an in-depth review of interpretations. At the same time, I think that the choice of tempo is very important when performing a piece of music, the quality of the performance is determined by this, among many other things. In performing Bach’s works, the performer has some freedom in terms of tempo, as Bach did not prescribe it in most cases, so it is a matter of individual taste to decide who likes what tempo. In the music of later ages, such as the performance of Bartók's works, this freedom no longer exists, he specified in the score exactly how long the given piece should last.
My comment on the tempo did not touch on Tatyana Nikolaeva's performing skills, which I hold in high esteem, but only on the fact that, when performed at different tempos, the same piece has a different effect.
@@ferenctimar I agree with almost everything you say- but the choice of tempo is just soooo personal and there is no right or wrong.It also depends so much on your age/ experience/ moment etc...I just get so fed up with people saying "too fast" and "too slow".I can see you are a professional musician.Maybe I was to harsh in my first reply for which I apoligise.Have a lovely day.
@@mackiceicukice OK. Have a lovely day too!
Is she using sustain pedal ?
Of course she is using it. It must be used in Bach, judiciously and carefully.
I am sure you are wrong about "must" be used in Bach". @@galanis38
@@johnhertenstein5778 There is a certain long-held school of thinking and piano teaching that pedal should not be used in transferring Bach works composed for the harpsichord (and to a degree the clavichord) to the piano, on the grounds that the original instruments didn't have pedals. Such thinking ignores the differences between the modern piano and the original instruments, both in terms of sonority and mechanism.
la référence Bach est erronnee!