How to use the full power of MidJourney V5 new features. MUST SEE for studio photographers!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 апр 2023
  • I'll show you how to use a new features of MidJourney v5 to get PRECISE images that you need for your work. Example: you take a picture with your phone and turn it into a professional studio-like shot with Midjourney using "describe". And much more..
    In this video:
    00:52 The beauty of "describe" command and how to use it.
    05:15 "Describe" for interior designers.
    10:15 "Blend" command (amazing results, you'll be surprised!
    13:40 "Blend" + "Describe" + "Reference Image" = insane results
    19:07 My new project, www.onlineschoolcreator.com
    Check Who is Alex Koloskov: www.onlineschoolcreator.com
    🎓 📷 ❤️ Subscribe to Our Channel Photigy: 👉👉 bit.ly/2OPhZdA
    Photigy is the interactive school of photography, retouching and CGI. The fastest way to become an expert for everyone in product photography.
    Subscribe on bit.ly/Photigy-Website and get +100 tutorials for free
    Follow us on:
    Instagram: bit.ly/instagram-photigy
    Pinterest: bit.ly/pinterest-photigy
    Facebook: bit.ly/photigy-fan-page
    Join on our group: bit.ly/photigy-FB-group

Комментарии • 55

  • @stephon972
    @stephon972 Год назад

    this is amazing I thought I was the only one using mid journey to come up with jewelery designs

  • @nasserahmad4653
    @nasserahmad4653 Год назад

    That’s great video,thank you for sharing 👌

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Glad you liked it! Thanks!

  • @Eryn75
    @Eryn75 Год назад

    You are the best Alex!

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Thank you, Irene!

  • @josephchan4198
    @josephchan4198 Год назад +1

    Great for creating adds and something to learn as a hobby or business.

  • @girliedog
    @girliedog Год назад +1

    Thank you for this excellant demonstration. I was hesitant about getting into AI but it's growing on me. Your tutuorial has inspired me to go further.

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Glad you liked it. Thank you!

  • @bryallen11
    @bryallen11 Год назад +1

    I love you Alex!!!

  • @jrfsailing07
    @jrfsailing07 Год назад

    Thank you very much!

  • @andrespineda5941
    @andrespineda5941 2 месяца назад

    Amazing video man, Im just starting watching AI videos to undrestand, I am a portrait photographer and want to come out with some AI images for my portfilio.

  • @VanquishRCP1
    @VanquishRCP1 Год назад

    Thanks!

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      We really appreciate your support. Thanks!

  • @WilbertMaximus
    @WilbertMaximus Год назад +1

    Thanks Alex, Great video!. It's still the fact that images from MidJourney are at a low resolution (max default 1024, and max 2048pix),
    But, it's a great tool and great video explanation by you. It gave more insights again and that will help me forward for future product shot creativity.
    It gives me directions of getting correct lighting setups and color combinations for my products shoots in a much faster way and will provide me more possible variations.

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад +1

      Yes, its relatively low. But with upscaler you can print them relatively large..

    • @WilbertMaximus
      @WilbertMaximus Год назад

      @@photigy Ok, Not sure if I know how it works and if I missed it, but what is large and what resolutions are involved? Or do you mean upscaling with external 3th party tools?

    • @desireepfeiffer
      @desireepfeiffer Год назад +1

      @@WilbertMaximus Photoshop has a neural filter that will allow you to upscale, called Super Zoom. I upscaled an AI image & printed it yesterday and it looked great. It was 12x18 inches @ 300 dpi. Anything larger than that the quality starts to degrade, but I'm really particular about printing & quality so others might upscale larger.

    • @desireepfeiffer
      @desireepfeiffer Год назад +1

      If you're just doing it for web than you can upscale much larger at 72 dpi

    • @flickwtchr
      @flickwtchr Год назад

      @@desireepfeiffer On the web the only thing that matters is pixel dimension e.g., the long side pixel dimension. For print, yes the dpi matters. Here is a great article on this, I can't post a url without it being removed, so just google this text, and you will find it if you're interested. "Let’s clarify this once and for all:
      only pixel dimensions matter on the web"

  • @arunbhardwaj3045
    @arunbhardwaj3045 Год назад

    Do u think all the backgrounds would be created in Midjourney and u would shoot product and create composite images by merging the two in Photoshop for final outcomes?

  • @ilyakhasin9587
    @ilyakhasin9587 Год назад

    Молодец! Очень профессионально записаный ролик!

  • @krzysztofbigos6121
    @krzysztofbigos6121 Год назад

    Alex, could I show the command that I entered to the IP

  • @eddiedykes5
    @eddiedykes5 Год назад

    How do you get to see all angels of the image (product) if I wanted to get it manufactured??

  • @michaelenglund
    @michaelenglund 7 месяцев назад

    Thanks. However. How do I only change one thing in the AI created image? For example. Only take away the wrinkles of the background to your image created from your stilleben.

  • @NickSpirov
    @NickSpirov Год назад +1

    Great video!!! One tip: you can set quality to high (--q 2 ) which means that all 4 images are created already with the big size 1024 - then if you want just one separately, the U1-U4 commands are instantaneous. But I usually just save the 4-image collage, it's 2048x2048.

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the info!

    • @NickSpirov
      @NickSpirov Год назад

      @@photigy I realized that this only happens with version 5 (--v 5). By default it is on version 4 and in that case the 4 images are not pre-made in advance.

  • @mikeamescreations
    @mikeamescreations Год назад +1

    You're all over the place, but I really got a lot out of this video.

  • @sachinkhare1688
    @sachinkhare1688 Год назад

    Hi Alex, one question in my mind is, isn't AI killing professional Photographers job coz now anyone can take pictures with their phones and generate it the way they want. Don't you think brands will go AI instead of hiring a professional Photographer? Please share your thoughts.

    • @WilbertMaximus
      @WilbertMaximus Год назад +4

      No, I don't think so, because you cannot easily replicate images and do small changes and improvements.
      The current resolution is also to small for real printed photo's.
      You also cannot make series in a way that different products are in the same set-up (pack shots) for a uniform look on eg websites
      I do not doubt it will improve, but I don't mind. It will create new kind of work; so called prompt writers. You need to "imagine" what you want to get out and AI is giving you suggestions.
      It is not the other way around.
      I use it for moodboards, idea generations and for directions of shoots.
      I'm currently playing around with the tool to see how it helps me to create photo ideas and lighting ideas.
      I see it as a tool that helps me, not one that destroys. 🙂

    • @Readingworld2023
      @Readingworld2023 Год назад +2

      Technology will never replace a human

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад +1

      Agree with Wilbert - its not going to happen soon. AI can't generate an exact image of anything... IIt will DREAM about it, and the result will be like a dream about. Commercial photographers takes exactly what and how client wants:-)

  • @krzysztofbigos6121
    @krzysztofbigos6121 Год назад

    Alex, could I show the command that I entered in artificial intelligence for a combination of images

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Sure, what the command did you enter?

  • @quietspacearts
    @quietspacearts Год назад +1

    Is it free and how secure is it?

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Its free. Its public - all the security is under Discord account (its sort of a messenger), and MJ has a private mode when results won't be shared on public.

    • @flickwtchr
      @flickwtchr Год назад

      @@photigy You are ridiculous how you keep removing my comment. If you have an issue with what I said, then tell me where I'm wrong. This is NOT a true statement. "Its free. Its public - all the security is under Discord account (its sort of a messenger), and MJ has a private mode when results won't be shared on public."

  • @KrunoslavStifter
    @KrunoslavStifter Год назад +3

    Seems to me that everyone loves "free money" until they realize what inflation is. Everyone loves "free images" until they realize what inflation is. In other words... There is no such thing as a free lunch.

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад +1

      Why you think it's a free money: Where is the money there?;)
      I see it as a tool - and like any tool, it can be used to make money, or do something else, like hobby, etc.

    • @KrunoslavStifter
      @KrunoslavStifter Год назад

      @@photigy Its a tool, sure. My point was that much like anything, when you inflate number of something you decrease its rarity, it becomes worth...less. Smartphones have made easy for anyone to make images, and social media has made it easy to publish. This is inflation in action. Now even best images, had a hard time getting the attention because people have become so used to seeing images all the time, they really have a short attention span and less appreciation for it. AI generative imagery allows anyone with virtually no skill to create all kinds of images. It inflates the number of images in circulation, resulting in more and more images, chasing same amount of people and fewer and fewer minutes of attention span. In a few years, we will all notice the penalty of this.
      Just like trillions of dollars created out of thin air during last few years. Well now all those dollars are worth less and less because they are chasing same or fewer number of goods and services. When goverment was giving out stimulus checks, people didn't complain, but now when you go buy gas for your car or you go pay your bills or buy groceries you can feel the effects of inflation, can't you? That is how it works. We can expect the effect of inflation of AI generated images to be felt once the honeymoon phase is over. That was my point. There is danger in this technology, not enough people are talking about because they are too busy plying with the new toy. In a year or two, we can revisit this conversation to see if I was right or not. In the meantime, yeah, why not, lets play. What could possibly go wrong?
      Cheers!

    • @brentschmogbert
      @brentschmogbert Год назад

      But images are really free. Stupid @krumoslav stifter

  • @andyrevo8081
    @andyrevo8081 Год назад

    In a year, anybody can take a photo of any product and give it any context - and AI will generate a beautiful shot with the actual product, not some fantasy mockup. No studio. No lights. No professional photographer. Portraits? Cellphone plus AI will yield better results than any studio session. Fashion? Put the clothes on a mannequin or spread them out, take some iphone shots. Next step: AI puts them onto photoreal models and the setting is Acapulco Beach or Paris. Most photographers do not get it yet. It's over, folks.

  • @ramonvillegas1785
    @ramonvillegas1785 Год назад +1

    Hope that you are aware that all “ai” image generators are capable of generating images due of massive art stealing, mid journey used without consent of anyone the drawings, paintings and photographs of millions of humans in order to get its predictive algorithm trained, really sad to see someone I’ve admired and considered the best product photographer in the world promoting this stuff

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Please elaborate on "stealing".. How did they do it?

    • @franzhollywood
      @franzhollywood Год назад

      @@photigy Well you should start reading about it if you don't know. Plenty to find online and it is a problem bc it takes images from anybody and pays no royalties to nobody. Ask a stock photographer..lol...I think it is pretty self explanatory!

    • @ramonvillegas1785
      @ramonvillegas1785 Год назад

      @@photigy sure, for example mid journey, in order for it to be capable to simulate the art style of recognized human artists it’s database was feed with all paintings, drawings or photographs of that artist and it happened illegally without any consent or compensation of any kind, if you input for example the name of Nekro, Santiago Caruso, Roberto Ferri or any alive famous artist as part of your prompt the mid journey algorithm will deliver you an image that resembles any of those artists stiles and that’s because they’re developers added dozen of millions of art pieces, during the video Alex uploaded a ring photograph he took during one of his courses, now that picture became part of the mid journey database, he gave them without knowing part of his hard work for free, now the algorithm can use it to copy form it whenever someone else requires for a ring photorealistic image

    • @ramonvillegas1785
      @ramonvillegas1785 Год назад

      @@photigy all predictive algorithms work the same way, for example chat gpt, if it’s capable of deliver specific and logical responses it’s because it’s database was feed with almost every ebook, digital journal and news website available on the web, again without consent of they’re respective authors, everyone seems to be so amazed with “ai” generators but not everyone seems to know all the illegal stuff they’re developers are doing to make it work

  • @flickwtchr
    @flickwtchr Год назад +1

    Unsubscribed because Alex apparently doesn't respect someone pointing out when he is wrong.

    • @photigy
      @photigy  Год назад

      Hm.. Where it was?