2023 Cagematch: Dynastar M-Free 99 vs M-Pro 99 - SkiTalk.com
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2022
- Winks joins Phil Pugliese for this cagematch between these two sibling rivalries to help you discern the difference in two skis from Dynastar that have some similarities, but ski very differently.
If you enjoyed this cagematch, you can find more information and read the full written reviews of these skis on SkiTalk.com
Read the Cage match here: www.skitalk.com/threads/2023-... 
Спорт
great video, thanks guys
Looks like the bindings on the M-Free are mounted further forward? Due to the twin-tip design? Are both skis mounted to line up with center line, or do you advise to have the M-Free mounted e.g. 1cm forward of center?
Both Skis’s were mounted on the factory recommended line
They could live in the same quiver.
Hi I am 47 5'-9" and 205 lbs. I want a pair of ski to chase my 11 years old son through trees, park and fresh snow. I also like to ski in groomer, switch, jump and carving. I need your opinion;
1) Between BC-100 and M-Free 99 which one should I get?
2) What Length would you recommend?
P.S. I got QST 98 last year and was very chattery. How is these skis compared to Qst 98?
Thank You
The M/Free 99 are a bit quieter and stronger than both the Bent 100 and even the QST 98. So if you found the QST was chattery, then you won't like the Atomic. As far as length, the 179 cm was my first thought.
@@skitalkdotcom Thank you for your your quick response! In this case would you recommend M-Free 99 for my ski application? I was also thinking about Rustler 10 and enforcer 104, please advise!
Thank you again for great videos.
@@michaelghaeli87 Do you want to get a ski that is 102-104? If so, both of those are fine choices in that category, between those, i would say the Nordica is less chattery.
@@skitalkdotcom Thank you agin for prompt response and advice! Do you think M-Free 99 is a good choice?
@@michaelghaeli87 the Mfree is waaay more maneuverable than the enforcer or mpro. (I own the mpro and love them, but definitely different)
I skied the mfree 99 through trees in Lake Tahoe last year. They were amazing in spring conditions. (And I ski a lot of skis) The Tails dissapear behind you. Point and shoot. Exceptionally easy to pivot for there width and weight. If I'm not mistaken Mfree 99 is actually heavier than the M pro,Or very close... As an east coast skier, I absolutely would not take the M free 99 out if there are firm conditions. For instance They struggled to hold an edge on the steepest frozen groomed run on Kirkwood. I was genuinely nervous the 1st 3 turns, And that very rarely happens. (I Realize they are not designed for this type of skiing, but that's what was in front of me at 8:30 AM, You often have to ski groomers to get to the woods ) However As the day went on and things softened up they were fine. (Keep in mind I'm an East Coast skier, used to carving skis)
they are unbelievably fun. So smooth when you're stopping landings.. If you don't have to worry about hard pack I, I say get them... If you do have to worry about hard pack And you're a strong skier, You can consider the mpro. It's pretty surfy in the front. The tail is a little bit more demanding. Maybe size down in an Mpro?
Or Check out the Nordica unleashed 98. (Replaced the soul rider) Twin tip with a little metal. Could be a good option....
For some people it could be a one ski option on the West Coast,, but for me I think it's an exceptional addition to a quiver..I'm still thinking about them🤩🤩
Let me win the Strive bindings please